Oxford University Press
[Pages:25]CONFIDENTIAL HKDSE 2017 observations
? Oxford University Press (China) Limited
Oxford University Press
HKDSE 2017 observations
1
HKDSE 2017 observations ? Oxford University Press (China) Limited
Contents
Paper 1 ............................................................................................................................. 3 Paper 2 ............................................................................................................................. 11 Paper 3 ............................................................................................................................. 15
2
HKDSE 2017 observations ? Oxford University Press (China) Limited
Paper 1
Part A
One longer reading passage in Part A (going back to the 2013 and 2014 format) 21 Questions (quite standard, compared to 18 Qs in 2016 and 31 [notably high] in 2015) 41 Marks Word Count: 1057 words
Reading passage: Text 1 The Myth of Recycling (text type: opinion piece, article)
Source: Adapted from
Most of the original content has been kept. At more than 1000 words, candidates may find the length overwhelming (though the language
level is not out of the ordinary for a Part A text). This is an opinion piece, using the second person to address the reader, rhetorical questions,
quotes and an argumentative style. Candidates are likely to be familiar with the topic of recycling, but some of the technical vocabulary
and statistics may cause problems for weaker candidates.
Comprehension section: question types
Like last year, the majority of the questions here are specific factual, with some inference involved (Q13, 14, 17, 18).
There is a clear progression of difficulty, with questions requiring more thought (such as higherorder thinking and main idea questions) towards the end of Part A.
Comprehension questions: question formats
A fair amount of multiple choice questions. There are, however, more multiple response questions than last year (perhaps due to the number
of marks for Part A remaining the same, but the number of questions going up).
Noteworthy questions
Q1: This question format (of ticking pictures that do not appear in the text) has not been seen since HKDSE 2013.
Q13: This question may be difficult because it requires inferencing to extract the correct percentages.
Q16: Irony may be a difficult concept for weaker candidates (especially considering there is no mention of the word itself in the text).
Q15: This question may potentially be tricky for weaker candidates, due to the paragraph in question (paragraph 14) featuring a lot of technical and topic-specific vocabulary.
3
HKDSE 2017 observations ? Oxford University Press (China) Limited
Q19: This format (two quote columns with the matching names underneath) has not been seen before in the HKDSE (although 2014 Q30 has a slightly similar layout).
Part B1
Three texts (2 reading passages, as in the 2013, 2014 and 2015 exams, but with a small infographic) 22 Questions (Text 2: 10 questions; Text 3: 13 questions) 43 Marks (Text 2: 22 marks; Text 3: 21 marks) 768 Words (Text 2: 354 words; Text 3: 25 words; Text 4: 389 words)
Reading passage: Text 2 Millennials--Coming of Age (text type: presentation slides)
Source: Adapted from PowerPoint presentation slides are a new format, never seen before in the HKDSE. (The
information/content in these slides--full sentences, only one image-- is more appropriate for an article, however. This text could easily have been presented in another format and it would not have made a difference.) Language is fairly simple, although there are figurative expressions (`prime spending years') Candidates should be able to relate to the topic, since they are millennials themselves.
Reading passage: Text 3 Who Are Millennials? (infographic)
Source: Adapted from
This is a small infographic (less than 30 words) with a few facts. It is odd to note that just one (specific factual) question (Q32) was dedicated to this text; this
information could have been inserted into either of the texts as a simple sentence. This is similar to Paper 3, however, where we also saw an increase in images in the Data File. This could be EAA's attempt to increase the extent of multimodality and assess candidates' visual literacy.
Reading passage: Text 4 Do Millennials Have it Better or Worse? (text type: article)
Source: Adapted from
The article has not been fully adapted; parts of it were copied verbatim from the original. This is a short article that most candidates should find interesting to read. Again, the language is not too difficult.
Comprehension section: question types
The mark distribution of questions between both texts is more or less proportionate to their respective word counts.
The question levels are appropriate for Part B1, the easier section. Mostly straightforward specific factual, although there are some that require further thinking.
4
HKDSE 2017 observations ? Oxford University Press (China) Limited
Again, the majority are specific factual and vocabulary questions.
Comprehension questions: question formats
Only one True/ False/ Not Given and one Ticking boxes question Short responses dominate the Text 2 questions.
Noteworthy questions
Generally straightforward (nothing that stands out particularly). Q33, asking candidates to match paragraph ideas to examples, has a slightly different format than
what's been seen before.
Part B2
One reading passage (once more, following the 2013, 2014 and 2015 exam) 15 Questions 43 Marks Word count: 1190 words
Reading passage: Text 4 MILLENNIALS--Themes in the Literature (Text type: academic research paper)
Source: Adapted from this paper
The theme is still Millennials (thematic link to B1); candidates should be personally familiar with the topic. However, they may find this text dry and unfamiliar (since it is an academic paper/journal article that heavily cites and focuses on research).
Academic citations/references have not been seen before in the HKDSE; this may amp up the difficulty, since candidates are unlikely to be familiar with citations before they have reached university level.
A noticeably higher language level than Part B1 (complex sentences, many relative clauses, passive voice structures and advanced vocabulary).
The critical analysis is also likely much deeper than what most candidates will be used to (a lot of references to sociohistorical factors, generational changes in familial relationships and cultural factors).
This text is likely to be the most difficult B2 text since the 2015 paper (the 2015 B2 topic was on liberal education), which is also supported by the readability statistics on p.7.
Except for the Introduction and Conclusion, there are missing subheadings similar to the 2012 Part B1 and 2016 Part A texts (except that they are labelled with roman numerals this time).
Advanced vocabulary used: conception, emergence, exuberant, foisted, ubiquitous, catalyst, overt
5
HKDSE 2017 observations ? Oxford University Press (China) Limited
Comprehension section: question types
There seems to be a few extended questions that straddle more than one skill at a time (for example: Q45, Q48 and Q52 include both Specific Factual and Inference questions).
There are also several questions (Q48, Q49, Q51, Q52) that test students understanding of how the main ideas/points within a paragraph are interconnected and supported by examples.
Comprehension questions: question formats
The most popular are the multiple choice (Q47, Q50, Q57), multiple short response (Q46, Q48, Q53) and table/diagram completion (Q49, Q51, Q52) formats.
This section also has fairly some challenging table completion questions (Q49, Q52).
Noteworthy questions
Q45: Even though this is the very first question in Part B2, there is a mix of specific factual and inference required (especially for statement iv), since the text does not explicitly state whether experts agree or disagree with the definition--just that there is one definition that differs to the text's definition.
Q48: Similarly, the first part of this question is specific factual but the other sections also require some degree of inference to complete them.
Q49: This is likely to be a difficult question for candidates, since it asks about the difference between the researchers' understanding of Millennials. Candidates will need to look for signal words such as `on the other hand', `in contrast' and `clashes'.
Q52: This question has never been seen before in the HKDSE (not just filling in a table, but with very loose parameters; e.g. no ticking boxes, no instructions on how many words to include).
Q53: There is no line number indication on where to find this in the text (although Prensky is only mentioned in one paragraph, candidates may still have to search hard for the answer since `metaphor' is not mentioned anywhere in the text, but `analogy' is used instead).
Q58: Since in-text citations are from university-level academics, it seems unfair to ask candidates to deconstruct their composition here (although it is possible to infer the answers from reading them closely and relating them to the text).
Q59: This question is quite tricky, since candidates will have to first infer what the quotes are saying in relation to the text, and then apply that to the relevant researcher(s) in order to score the marks.
Q60: The missing subheadings are used for this main idea question at the end, similar to 2012 Part B1 and 2016 Part A.
6
Statistics
Reading passages word counts
HKDSE 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Part A 994 1088 956
1022 (729+293) 988 (237+751)
Average 2017
1010 1057
HKDSE 2017 observations ? Oxford University Press (China) Limited
Part B1 888
818 (412+406) 894 (378+516) 914 (225+689)
881 (65+90+299+117+310)
879 768 (354 + 25 + 389)
Part B2 1103 (194+909)
1090 1105 1114 (997+117) 1116 (380+444+292) 1106 1190
Readability statistics
HKDSE
Part A
Part B1
Part B2
Flesch Kincaid Average Flesch Kincaid Average Flesch Kincaid Average
reading ease* grade level** reading ease grade level reading ease grade level
(higher, easier) (higher, harder) (higher, easier)
(higher, harder)
(higher, easier)
(higher, harder)
2012
71
56.6
43.45
2013
54.7
11.8
47.0 (49; 44.9)
12.2 (12.1;12.3)
47.6
12.8
2014
78.2 (80; 76.4)
6.08 (4.8; 7.36)
85.3
5.32
63.3
9.22
2015
72.4
7.26
58.9 (58.8; 59)
9.95 (9.8; 10.1)
66.7 (88.6; 44.7)
8.94 (4.58; 13.3)
2016
61.5
9.8
56.9
11.1
64.8
12.9
(49; 85.3; 65; (12,1; 5.32, (58.7; 50.4;
47.5; 57.1; 9.02, 12.7,
61.5)
(11.1; 12.9; 9.26)
65.1)
10.2, 9.52)
Average
69.9
8.8
59.8
9.96
55.744
10.451
2017
51.5
11.36
70.65
7.99
38.4
14.22
**The average grade level has been drawn from the averages of Flesch Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Score,
SMOG Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Automated Readability Index
*Score (Flesch School level
Notes
reading ease) 100.00?90.00 90.0?80.0 80.0?70.0 70.0?60.0 60.0?50.0
5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th & 9th grade 10th to 12th grade
Very easy to read. Easily understood by the average 11-year-old student. Easy to read. Conversational English for consumers. Fairly easy to read. Plain English. Easily understood by 13- to 15-year-old students. Fairly difficult to read.
50.0?30.0
College
Difficult to read.
30.0?0.0
College graduate
Very difficult to read. Best understood by university graduates.
[Source: Flesch, Rudolf. `How to Write Plain English'. University of Canterbury. Retrieved 24 April 2017]
7
HKDSE 2017 observations ? Oxford University Press (China) Limited
No. of questions/marks
HKDSE
Part A
2012
Q
M
20
47
2013 2014
25
41
30
47
2015 2016
31
40
18
41
Average 2017
25
43
21
41
Part B1
Q
M
20
45
20
41
29
41
24
40
28
43
24
42
22
43
Part B2
Q
M
33
46
20
41
25
41
22
40
29
43
26
42
15
43
Question types used in Part A
Question type
Question number
Thematic
--
Main idea
Q21
Specific factual Vocabulary
Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q7, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q17, Q18 Q6
Reference Inference
Q9, Q19
Language usage
Q8
Higher-order thinking Q16, Q20
Figurative language Q9
Views justification
--
Sequencing
2017 -1 14
1 -1 1 2 1 1 --
2016 -4 8
-1 3 1 --1 --
2015 1 7 2
2 4 7 -2 2 3 1
2014 -1 13
-4 10 -1 --1
2013 1 2 9
1 1 8 --1 -1
2012 1 3 7
2 1 5 ---1 --
Question formats used in Part A
Question format
Question number
Multiple choice
Q6, Q9, Q10, Q11(ii). Q12, Q21
Short response
Q2, Q5, Q11(i), Q17, Q18
Matching subheadings/ -main points
T/F/NG
Q4
Labelling pictures
--
Cloze completion Extended response
Q8 Q3, Q7, Q15, Q16, Q20
Matching sentences/ Q19 quotes to speakers
Sequencing Table completion
-Q13, Q14
Sentence completion --
Multiple short/ extended response Ticking boxes/ blackening circles
Q3, Q11, Q15 Q1
2017 2016 2015
6
5
1
5
2
17
--
2
--
1
1
1
--
1
--
1
1
1
5
5
--
1
--
--
--
--
1
2
--
--
--
--
-
3
--
--
1
--
--
2014 6
13
1
2 1 --1
1 -1 --
--
2013 7
7
--
2 1 2 ---
1 ----
--
2012 6
6
--
1 1 1 -1
-1 ---
--
8
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- 8 2 practice answer
- guidelines for read aloud test reader
- aimsweb oral reading fluency passages
- ar lexile dra reading counts chart gaston county schools
- k 5 children s literature and correlation of the virginia
- document resume ed 421 689 available from
- comparability of paper and computer administrations in
- english 132 west virginia university
- practice workbook grade 6 pe mrs martin s class
- early numeracy alexandria
Related searches
- minecraft online no download just press p
- minecraft online no download just press play
- syneos press release
- dry cleaning press machine
- dry cleaner press machine
- university of oxford philosophy
- oxford university vaccine study
- oxford university covid vaccine
- university of oxford vaccine
- oxford university covid 19 vaccine
- oxford university department of philosophy
- oxford university reading list