WordPress.com



Name _________________________________________ Team ______________________________________MeasureScoreWriting Quality (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 Pulitzer)Visual Quality: Layout, Use of Images, Videos, and Media (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 vibrant)Critical Thinking, Arguments and Assertions are Logical (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 brilliant)Analysis of Event (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 definitive)Use of Class Lectures, Readings, and Concepts in Framing the Event (1-100: 20 marginal, 70 acceptable, 100 masterful) 6. How Person, Movement, or Tech Influenced Event (1-50: 10 marginal, 35 fair, 50 brilliant) 7. Use of Sources; at Least One Scholarly (1-50: 10 poor, 35 acceptable, 50 PhD) TotalName _________________________________________ Team ______________________________________MeasureScoreWriting Quality (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 Pulitzer)Visual Quality: Layout, Use of Images, Videos, and Media (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 vibrant)Critical Thinking, Arguments and Assertions are Logical (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 brilliant)Analysis of Event (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 definitive)Use of Class Lectures, Readings, and Concepts in Framing the Event (1-100: 20 marginal, 70 acceptable, 100 masterful) 6. How Person, Movement, or Tech Influenced Event (1-50: 10 marginal, 35 fair, 50 brilliant) 7. Use of Sources; at Least One Scholarly (1-50: 10 poor, 35 acceptable, 50 PhD) TotalName _________________________________________ Team ______________________________________MeasureScoreWriting Quality (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 Pulitzer)Visual Quality: Layout, Use of Images, Videos, and Media (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 vibrant)Critical Thinking, Arguments and Assertions are Logical (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 brilliant)Analysis of Event (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 definitive)Use of Class Lectures, Readings, and Concepts in Framing the Event (1-100: 20 marginal, 70 acceptable, 100 masterful) 6. How Person, Movement, or Tech Influenced Event (1-50: 10 marginal, 35 fair, 50 brilliant) 7. Use of Sources; at Least One Scholarly (1-50: 10 poor, 35 acceptable, 50 PhD) TotalName _________________________________________ Team ______________________________________MeasureScoreWriting Quality (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 Pulitzer)Visual Quality: Layout, Use of Images, Videos, and Media (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 vibrant)Critical Thinking, Arguments and Assertions are Logical (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 brilliant)Analysis of Event (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 definitive)Use of Class Lectures, Readings, and Concepts in Framing the Event (1-100: 20 marginal, 70 acceptable, 100 masterful) 6. How Person, Movement, or Tech Influenced Event (1-50: 10 marginal, 35 fair, 50 brilliant) 7. Use of Sources; at Least One Scholarly (1-50: 10 poor, 35 acceptable, 50 PhD) Total ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download