WordPress.com
Name _________________________________________ Team ______________________________________MeasureScoreWriting Quality (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 Pulitzer)Visual Quality: Layout, Use of Images, Videos, and Media (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 vibrant)Critical Thinking, Arguments and Assertions are Logical (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 brilliant)Analysis of Event (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 definitive)Use of Class Lectures, Readings, and Concepts in Framing the Event (1-100: 20 marginal, 70 acceptable, 100 masterful) 6. How Person, Movement, or Tech Influenced Event (1-50: 10 marginal, 35 fair, 50 brilliant) 7. Use of Sources; at Least One Scholarly (1-50: 10 poor, 35 acceptable, 50 PhD) TotalName _________________________________________ Team ______________________________________MeasureScoreWriting Quality (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 Pulitzer)Visual Quality: Layout, Use of Images, Videos, and Media (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 vibrant)Critical Thinking, Arguments and Assertions are Logical (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 brilliant)Analysis of Event (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 definitive)Use of Class Lectures, Readings, and Concepts in Framing the Event (1-100: 20 marginal, 70 acceptable, 100 masterful) 6. How Person, Movement, or Tech Influenced Event (1-50: 10 marginal, 35 fair, 50 brilliant) 7. Use of Sources; at Least One Scholarly (1-50: 10 poor, 35 acceptable, 50 PhD) TotalName _________________________________________ Team ______________________________________MeasureScoreWriting Quality (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 Pulitzer)Visual Quality: Layout, Use of Images, Videos, and Media (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 vibrant)Critical Thinking, Arguments and Assertions are Logical (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 brilliant)Analysis of Event (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 definitive)Use of Class Lectures, Readings, and Concepts in Framing the Event (1-100: 20 marginal, 70 acceptable, 100 masterful) 6. How Person, Movement, or Tech Influenced Event (1-50: 10 marginal, 35 fair, 50 brilliant) 7. Use of Sources; at Least One Scholarly (1-50: 10 poor, 35 acceptable, 50 PhD) TotalName _________________________________________ Team ______________________________________MeasureScoreWriting Quality (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 Pulitzer)Visual Quality: Layout, Use of Images, Videos, and Media (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 vibrant)Critical Thinking, Arguments and Assertions are Logical (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 brilliant)Analysis of Event (1-50: 10 poor, 35 fair, 50 definitive)Use of Class Lectures, Readings, and Concepts in Framing the Event (1-100: 20 marginal, 70 acceptable, 100 masterful) 6. How Person, Movement, or Tech Influenced Event (1-50: 10 marginal, 35 fair, 50 brilliant) 7. Use of Sources; at Least One Scholarly (1-50: 10 poor, 35 acceptable, 50 PhD) Total ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- 100 ways to celebrate 100 years nc state university
- laboratory 1 university of wisconsin stevens point
- 90 day action plan
- how to use this template pointclickcare 1 cloud based
- example of a qa project plan review checklist
- family and consumer sciences course syllabus
- sample iso 9001 quality manual asq
- product inspection report global sources
- moving your site to the new sharepoint site
- project objective outcomes and outputs
Related searches
- wordpress passing data between pages
- wordpress business templates
- wordpress rss feed not working
- wordpress jquery is not defined
- create wordpress blog
- wordpress roles editor
- wordpress full rss feed
- wordpress rss feed settings
- wordpress rss feed plugin
- wordpress display rss feed
- wordpress rss feed link
- wordpress rss feed to post