Teaching with the brain in mind:



Annotated Bibliography:

What can brain based research tell about enhancing reading?

Diane Clark

5710

April 25, 2005

My interest in brain research for reading was two fold. I am interested in how the brain learns and in turn how that can affect the area of reading. I believe that teaching a child or person to read is the most valuable gift one can receive. It enables that person to communicate in a society that I believe functions on the ability to read. At the school where I currently teach, Brain Booster workshops are being taught in a series of one-hour sessions for eight weeks. These workshops integrate brain based learning strategies for the classroom. I am using these strategies prior to teaching reading, to see if in act they work. When deciding on a topic for question two, I decided on brain based research ideas to enhance reading because I am currently involved with that in my classroom. The following are the articles I found that involve studies and strategies for brain based learning:

Banikowski, A., & Mehring, T. (1999). Strategies to enhance memory. Focus on Exceptional Children. 32 2 (1-16).

The authors of this article give strategies to help enhance students’ abilities in memory based on brain research. They detail several areas that affect memory in learning. The areas are: attention, short-term memory, long-term memory semantic memory, episodic memory, and procedural memory. Strategies that can help are giving students clue or signals, which help student’s time to stop and focus or attend to the teacher, using contrast, which can help students help attend to the content being covered. (i.e. props, movement, sounds, changing the environment, and voice tone or inflection.), and creating emotion, which can activate and stimulate the brain to recall information better established a purpose for learning to better understand why that particular learning is taking place. Organize the learning so that the learning can be facilitated in the best possible way. Giving a big picture enabling for students to see what will take place and then organizing that information so students see a process can be extremely helpful.

Other useful information the authors detail are strategies to facilitate prior knowledge, strategies to involve student in the learning process, strategies to facilitate students in their ability to construct meaning and strategies to facilitate students in demonstrating their learning.

Strategies discussed to facilitate activating students prior knowledge are: promoting a KWL graphic organizer, providing a prediction guide to recall previous knowledge and using metaphors, analogies and imager.

Strategies to facilitate students in the learning process are: EPR (Every Pupil Response), which can be small or whole group, using many techniques (i.e. chalkboard, white boards, etc.) to initiate a student response. Utilizing cooperative learning for engaging students in active learning (think-pair-share, chunking) is another way to engage an active learning process. Reciprocal teaching is effective in working with below level readers particularly in content areas. In using reciprocal teaching, other areas that can be affected are: asking questions, summarizing, clarification and predicting. By initiating role-playing, students can act out “real life” roles, which can activate learning. The use models, and hands-on manipulative can facilitate learning by engaging student in active learning.

Strategies to facilitate students and their ability to construct meaning can happen through he use of graphic organizers, semantic mapping, story mapping, monitoring comprehension, understanding text and it’s structure, writing and it’s use in organizing thoughts, which an aid in the comprehension of text.

Strategies to facilitate students in demonstrating learning can be again, organizing material, rehearsing information and the use of mnemonics to recall information.

All of the strategies discussed can enhance student learning in the area of reading by applying them in a classroom situation. Teachers’ goals are to create independent learners who can take an active part in each lesson presented.

Brandt, R., (1997). On Using Knowledge. Educational Leadership. 62 3 (16-19).

Being able to apply knowledge from research learned about how the brain functions are the main point of this article. Educators need to be aware of educational items that they have known for some time; approximate time for a lesson should take in the classroom, encouragement of students to be actively involved in a lesson, and the emotional component of keeping students in tuned to a lesson. Teachers need to keep abreast of changes in education in the subjects they teach and notice changes in subjects they don’t teach but need to have an awareness of changes that take place in others. The article discusses that teachers need to be aware that students will learn quickly if they are showing interest in the subject matter.

An interesting fact found in this article is that one reason that children may have trouble reading is that the brain may not see reading and writing as critical to survival and that “importance and difficulty are not the same.” Teachers need to implement some of the ideas they present to their students in learning through exploration, engagement in activities of interest and discussion of what is learned. That needs to be applied in their reading and writing.

I think all teachers would agree that keeping a student’s interest in the subject matter would help them learn the content. By engaging students in active learning of the subject, exploration and discussion may keep them highly motivated to pursue on their own reading and writing in that area discussed, young readers or old.

Burmark, L. (2002). Visual Literacy, Learn to See, See to Learn. ADCD (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Alexandria, VA.

In society with imagery being able to convey a multitude of emotions with facts through the use of technology; it is immediate in how one may perceive information. This book relates the significance of visual literacy in education and the importance of processing words and pictures. The brain research the author uses is adapted from Howard Gardner in his theory of multiple intelligences and that “each child’s intelligence is actually a unique combination of multiple intelligences, linguistic, logical-mathematical, intrapersonal, spatial/visual, musical, bodily kinesthetic, and naturalist.” It is stated, “combining visual images with written text can help students remember what they read.” Allan Paivio is also mentioned with information regarding “that visual and verbal information are encoded and is decoded by separate, specialized perceptual and cognitive channels in the brain.” “Dual coding” takes place when the information is presented in different forms. An exploration of visual literacy is detailed with communication being addressed through graphics generated in the classroom. Aspects touched on in the book are: context and the importance of it, readability, color in the classroom, visual impressions, enhancing instruction through visual literacy, successful presentations, and the use of imagery with words.

The book focuses on the use of imagery in society and how it influences students with ideas to better educate them in a way that is more significant than what has been the norm in past traditional teaching. The use of imagery is widely used in education to

evoke ideas and new learning in all grade levels. Teachers can use visual imagery in reading to help implement reading ideas. I use a print rich environment to introduce new concepts in reading and to review them daily.

Caulfield, J., & Kidd, S. (2000). Brain-Based Instruction in Action. Educational Leadership. 11 58 (62-65).

In this article, brain based research was involved in a study by researchers at a high performing school. This study involved a staff at a good school that wanted to make their school better through research, collaborative efforts, sharing and analyzing information they obtained about how information was taught at the school. The staff at Valley Park Elementary in Kansas City entered into a partnership with CARE, the Center for the Advancement of Reform in Education at Rockhurst University in Kansas City, Missouri. Brain compatible practices were the focus. Their findings fell into three categories. The first category was “ the brain changes physiologically as a result of experience.” External experiences can change the brains structure and function to a response. For teachers, this means they need to continually change their environment so that it is challenging, not to easy or not to hard, for the brain will not function when those latter are present. The second is “ education influences learning”. The article states that “people retain more of what they learn when the brain recognizes an experience as useful.” Positive emotions would be receptive where those aligned with fear or negativity would not be receptive to students and they would shut down. Teachers should provide an emotionally positive environment for learning to take place. The third category is “intelligence is multiple”. Multiple intelligences can play a factor in learning rather than just relying on recall of facts. When an understanding was made in those areas, the school put it into practice. They created an environment aligned with the district’s character education plan. They developed yearlong themes with spiraling the context. Teachers organized the material in novel way that kept the children interest. Through multiple intelligences, teachers allowed mastery of skills in appropriate developmental practices. Through these steps, the teachers allowed for effective curriculum with multiple perspectives to be implemented with a collaborative effort.

I think all teachers could learn how to more effectively create a better learning situation in all areas but particularly reading through what this staff did at Valley Park Elementary. Through the implementation of creating positive experiences, have a positive environment and providing multiple intelligences in instruction, students will gain more in learning particularly reading. If the teacher is interested then children tend to be more interested in what they are learning.

Davis, S. (2000). Look Before You Leap: Concerns About “Brain-Based” Products and Approaches. Childhood Education. Winter 77 (100- 107).

This article addresses the pitfalls that one can encounter when reading about research that states what a teacher should do to make their classroom the best for the children in their care. The author states that at a symposium (for the foundation for academic Excellence), that focused on brain development in the area of Art and Music neuroscientists and educators were to speak of their findings in brain research, but when how asked how the brain actually worked, one scientist stated that he did not know how it worked, which set the tone for this article. There are four areas discussed in this article, “what does brain research tell us about critical periods in development, what does brain research tell us about enriched environments, does brain research offer any applicable knowledge and what about the future.”

A study done on children (infants to age fifteen), who had some neurological disorder (seizures) using position emission tomography. Brain activity during children’s maturation was the focus of the study, and the results were that the brain activity stayed higher than adults. The most interest finding was that “repeated use of neuronal pathways will result in certain connections being strengthened.” The downside of this study is that it doesn’t state the items of activities that show strong connections or those that do not. The conclusion is that some loss maybe natural in brain activity.

The study for enriched environments involved rate and their ability to function in complex environments. No correlations can be made for infants and preschoolers with this particular study.

What kind of knowledge can be offered from brain research? The authors state that there have been some studies that my show direct connections of educational practices and the physiologic function of the brain, but they haven’t been done as of yet.

Teachers fall into the trap of reading an article that may state how using a program or activity that may advertise as one that will meet the educational needs of students in their care, and they purchase it. Teachers should find out all they can before delving into a program. As the author states, “educators need to keep reading about scientific findings and keep asking questions.” In the area of reading, especially for teachers who teach the very young, there are a multitude of programs that address new techniques. It is very hard not to purchase something because it looks good or says it will create better readers. Teachers who do their homework and check out the new programs through research will provide what their student’s best interest is in the area of reading.

Lyon, R. & Chhabra, V. (2004). The Science of Reading Research. Educational Leadership. 3 40 (13-17).

Reid Lyon and Vinita Chhabra state that “ the schools fundamental responsibility is the ensure that all students read proficiently.” These authors state that the process to teach all children to read may be difficult due to several factors: teacher training may be inadequate relying on experience and anecdotal information give to them, student advantages versus students that come from disadvantaged backgrounds. Those from low-income backgrounds are not as skilled at phonological sensitivity. This may be due to having low literacy interactions while in pre-school years. They may catch up to peers but it would take a trained teacher to know how to teach those essential reading components: phonemic awareness, phonics, reading fluency, vocabulary and reading comprehension. The instruction needs to be systematic and students need to be identified early. Older children may require more extensive instruction, but under the right instructional conditions may make great gains.

I had the opportunity to be involved in training in the Orton-Gillingham method for reading. I tutored a student for a year using that method. There are some of those techniques that I use today in my classroom within a small group setting to help my students succeed. I can understand the findings in this article; I have seen children come into a school situation “behind” according to the standards set before us by our county. I use a systematic approach and it works. Teachers who are trained and know what to look for in Reading programs can make huge differences in their student’s lives by knowing what works.

McGeehan, J. (1999). Brain Compatible Learning. Green Teacher. 64 (7-12).

“Understanding the workings of the human brain can be the catalyst for dramatic and needed changes in classrooms.” This article discussed three key findings from brain research: “emotion in learning, intelligence is a function of experience, and that the brain stores most effectively what is meaningful from the learners perspective.” In dealing with emotions, Dr. Sylwester stated, “Emotions drive attention, which drives learning, memory and just about everything; thus when it comes to learning, the body and brain are inseparable and interdependent.” Some things that teachers can do to help with emotions are provide a safe predictable environment, model respect through common language where respect is developed, provide activities that promote trust, and caring, build a sense of community, and allow for students to know the “big picture”, that will take place by posting agendas. In understanding that intelligence is a function of experience, the teacher can provide a rich, sensory filled lesson with well-meaning instruction. The article states this can be done without worksheets or books. By providing real world experience, input to the brain allows dendratic growth to create new connections to that understanding. In understanding first hand experiences allows for such growth, gives teachers the reason for having a classroom that is vigorous in it’s learning. (Allowing for collaborative learning, cooperative learning, think alouds, and think-pair-share.) Creating meaning from information is something that students do based on experiences they have previously had. Teachers can help in this are by presenting information that the students care about allowing for meaning making to take place in long term memory. By acting on these key findings, students’ will and can build success.

Can these findings work within a reading program? I believe they can. Creating a safe environment can only increase awareness to the many aspects involved in reading. Allowing new experiences can help in creating rich stories, which allows for many reading functions to be explored. Allowing for personal meaning allows the student to be more involved in their learning.

Molfese, Victoria. & Molfese, Dennis L. (2002). Environmental and Social Influences on Reading Skills as Indexed by Brain and Behavioral Responses. Annals of Dyslexia. 52 (121-37).

This study was involved in electrophysiological and behavioral assessments in infants and children’s measurements of environmental factors that are linked to reading as well as the development of language and reading abilities through EPR (Event Related Potentials). The study tries to create understanding of how the environment plays a part in brain responses in the area of language and reading skills. The study involved several factors: biological factors, (what influences language and reading), and environmental factors that can play a part in intelligence in an environment. Certain variables can affect young and older children, i.e. reading materials, books, magazines, as well as other reading materials in the home, proximal variables. Distal variables can affect children as well. (i.e. socioeconomic variables, parent education). The authors state that research reports “ that children develop larger vocabularies, better reasoning skills and more advanced reading abilities in environments where conversations skills are encouraged.” This would be particularly valuable in homes that are low socio-economically and have very young children.

In this study, the use of ERP cam from electroencephalogram was used to measure the brains electrical activity. One important finding is through usage; it can “study an individual’s perceptions and decisions during tasks or following a learning situation. Speech perception has been studied using ERP, focusing on phonological processing.

Involving a child’s environment the authors state that the factors are related to the development of language and reading skills. Cognitive tests were performed that showed influences in intelligence. The results showed that “there is a strong case for the influence of home environment in development, suggesting that the child’s environment plays an important part n the development of intellectual skills.”

When involved with environmental influences on brain responses, opportunities a child has within a family structure and home activities correlate with the child’s general language and reading abilities.

Although the study was concerned with biological and environmental factors that may shape cognitive abilities within the foundation of language and reading skills, the authors report that other researchers state there are other factors that can influence language and reading skills and that one must be careful when evaluating reading ability. Factors that should be considered are working memory, information retrieval, automaticity, and symbol manipulations.

The information in this article is important to all teachers as it can give them a glimpse into a child’s home life and what they have been exposed in terms of reading materials and exposure to language, whether it be one rich with language experiences or one without. The information can help a teacher prepare more adequately for the children in their room.

Perry, B. (2000). How the Brain Learns Best. Instructor. 11 110 (34-37).

“All learning is brain based.” Teachers can enhance learning, by learning themselves how the brain works best, to include brain senses, processing and retrieval information. Teachers need to be aware that as they already know learning requires attention, that attention is mediated by neural systems in the brain and can fade just as one draws a sound in singing, the note eventually fades as their breath leaves. Learning is done by neural sets that connect, just as facts are connected in context, with out a set of facts or new learning, it stops. The brain will only address factual information for about four to eight minutes, then it seeks other stimuli (internal or external), a teacher who just teaches the facts will certainly have a room with some non-learners. There are certain elements that need to be used to be effective to gain and sustain a learner’s attention. Factual information needs to be present in a creative or novel way in its presentation. This article focused on “ the bob and weave lecture.” Moving back and forth allows interrelated neural systems to connect. By providing students “with a story to provide context, making sure to touch the emotional parts of their brains will activate and prepare the cognitive parts of the brain for storing information.” Students can share information more easily if there is humor, sadness, fear or an emotional component attached to it. While providing context in a story, connecting facts and concepts begin to build neural transmitters. Allowing for those facts to be reinforced through the “bob and weave” within the other facts of the narrative is a good technique to use for effective teaching.

This technique will work I feel in any grade level. I find that in teaching the very young in reading not only bob and weaving works well, but bringing in novel approaches to lessons may peek interest in the subject matter, (gadgets, and funny apparatus’).

Pool, C. ((1997). Maximizing Learning. Educational Leadership. March (11-15).

“All learning is brain based.” The maximization of learning is documented in this article with twelve principles.

* “the brain is a complex dynamic system.

* “the brain is a social brain.”

* “the search for meaning innate.

* “the search for meaning occurs through patterning.”

* “emotions are critical to patterning.

* “every brain simultaneously perceives and creates parts and wholes.”

* “learning involves both focused attention and peripheral perception.”

* “learning always involves conscious and unconscious processes.”

* “we have at least two ways of organizing memory.”

* “learning is developmental.”

* “complex learning is enhanced by challenge and inhibited by threat.”

* “every brain is uniquely organized.”

Studies made by Renate Nummela Caine found that “neurological pathways critical for later life are laid down from age zero to three. These pathways can affect the way interaction that takes place during developmental stages. They form the beliefs that children have about the world around them.”

Two ideas discussed in this article are threats and how the brain copes when feeling threatened, and downshifting, the idea that when children feel threatened the development of perceptual loops occur. They look for the familiarity in their environment to help them cope. Downshifting occurs when the lack of possibilities is apparent. One may feel that they cannot take a risk because of a threat, and it does take place in schools. To help children with threats, the teacher can provide a sense of safety through repetition and memorization. It is not compatible with higher order thinking or making connections, a lot of prior learning would have to take place. By creating a relaxed alertness, one will have a low threat atmosphere, which can create better learning opportunities. “Children learn best if they are immersed I complex experiences and are given the opportunity to actively process what they have learned.” To create a “big picture” that allows experiences that relate to real life.

A classroom teacher who supports learning with challenges and provides the resources to explore possibilities will create brain based learning. By providing immersion in learning, a teacher will provide many models to maximize learning. Cooperative or “process groups” seem to help foster ideas set forth by the teacher. If used with multiple intelligences, it can create success in the classroom.

I feel that all of this information is vital to teachers now. All teachers need to know what to do to maximize learning for their students in a reading environment.. Would this be vital in teaching reading? Absolutely! Providing a relaxed, safe environment, with low threat situations and modeling can help students succeed. It is important for teachers to know what to do to create the best possible learning environment so that their students can learn.

Roberts, J. (2002). Beyond Learning By Doing: The Brain Compatible Approach. The Journal of Experiential Education. 25 2 (281-285).

This article explores brain compatible approaches with experiential education. Discussed within the article are finding of how the brain best learns, principles and practical applications concerning brain based learning and quick tips by application that can be used. Information regarding new information of brain functions yielded interesting information. “The brain changes physiologically as a result of experiences and it can happen quicker than previously thought; that the environment in which the brain operates determines to a large degree the functioning ability and that the brain simultaneously processes a wide variety of information all at once.” Principles of brain-based learning were given and within those principles functions of the brain were given. Patterning and how the brain processes patterns, the tendency to figure out patterns, disregarding those that do not make sense, and integrating those for new information can be valuable to reading teachers. It can help in building a framework for reading concepts. Another area explored is the aspect of the brain being multi-tasked. Processing using VAKT, in an environment that presents information in a multi-sensory complex way, can be helpful. Exploration of the “stress and threat” factor was explored. Teachers who can lower stress in a learning environment by facilitating activities (i.e. games, sharing, cooperative learning), can build trust and alleviate stress in their students. Chunking information and presenting information in a “big picture” format are two techniques that teachers can use to make the information they are trying to present more meaningful. Chunking allows the brain to be able to process patterns and make sense of the information. Allowing the students to see the “big picture” gives them a glimpse of the learning experience about to take place, thus allowing for background patterning to take place and allow them to build on that.

I found this article to be meaningful in the way I teach. I use the “big picture” method in allowing the students to know what we are about to do; it makes them more comfortable in their leaning and allows the stress level to be minimal. I use the multi-sensory techniques everyday to reach as many students as I can. In teaching reading, patterning and chunking is very evident, in word ending, spellings and in the way some words work. I can see the elements of this article to be valuable for teaching reading.

Schiller, P. (2003). A Joyful Journey to Literacy. The Great Debate. Child Care Information Exchange. Nov. Dec. (6-12).

Daniel Greensburg stated, “When the brain is ready, you can’t stop a child from reading.” Developmental milestones are highlighted in this article, outlining when specific areas relate to reading. A “native language map” is developed between the forth ant eighth month in a child’s development. Neurons for every sound of that native language develop. While in utero, the mechanisms for hearing are forming in the fifth month of development. Does this mean that every child can read? The author states that “children need multiple and repetitive opportunities to play with the language.” Before a formal process in learning to read takes place. Children need experiences with language, evaluating what they have learned about the language, experiment with the language, exploration within that language, (language games, rhyming songs, finger plays), in finding patterns to reflect on how language works before they learn to read.

Four principles of literacy the author states are: “literacy is social”, it takes place with peers and family. “Literacy begins at birth”; through brain development literacy is developing. “All aspects of literacy, listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking develop interdependently.” “Literacy develops along a continuum such as intellectual and physical growth.” “Leaving children to develop at their own pace, on their own timetable is the best practice.”

Other areas touched upon are disposition (desire to read), peer approval, motivation and challenges in reading are all important.

I could relate to this article due to my teaching the very young. Understanding the need for exploration of the language, the need for real life experiences to draw upon, focusing on patterning, and allowing time for children grow and be ready for the formal process are all important areas to look at when teaching the very young to read.

Shaywitz, S., & Saywitz, B. (2004). Disability and the Brain. Educational Leadership.

61 6

This article focuses on reading research with neurological science to provide information for effective teaching in the area of reading. Highlighted areas of the article include topics in understanding reading disabilities, dyslexia, fluency and the importance of language acquisition. According to the authors findings they make the case that “Reading reflects language, and reading disability reflects a deficit with the language system.” An agreement drawn from the article states that evidence suggests that: “reading reflects language, and when there is a disability, there is a deficit in the spoken sounds.” They state that researchers, through brain imaging found there could be a problem in neural circuitry in those individuals who have problems in reading and learning to read. Reading instruction and scientific studies to assist in teaching reading are mentioned. Information regarding the brain imagery and information to how the brain reacts when a disability is acknowledged is examined. In the article, research in the area the language acquisition, the phases of literacy, using the front of the brain and back of the brain for articulating sounds is documented. Fluency builds by brain connections that are made through a step-by-step process. Applications of the connections made in deciphering a word are made analytically. A study made by the authors suggested that out of the 144 children involved, they identified the area of the brain that makes it possible for readers who are proficient read automatically. The occipital-temporal region, back of the brain is functioning in words at a rapid pace. They state, “The word form system appears to predominate when a reader has become fluent. As a result of the finding, the left side of the brain is a key component in becoming a skilled reader. Compensation may take place, as readers who struggle get older, by the “development of alternate reading systems in the front of the brain, a functioning system, but not an automatic system.”

In this article the authors draw from the National Reading Panel report as a “well designed scientific study to guide reading instruction.” They state that there are factors which should be used in order to teach children to read: alphabetics, phonemic awareness, phonics, reading fluency, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. They state that these should be taught systematically. They give several key factors in choosing reading programs in schools: “ is there scientific evidence that the program is effective,

was the program reviewed by the National Reading Panel?, is phonemic awareness and phonics taught systematically and explicitly?, how are students taught in approaching unfamiliar words?, does the program include opportunities for students to practice reading, develop fluency, build vocabulary, develop reading comprehension strategies, write, listen and discuss stories.?”.

In this article, I found that the information regarding research could be valuable for teachers in understanding how the brain functions in reading. The information from the National Reading Panel, I have seen and understand that those components stated are certainly important to have in a reading program but that information could be considered biased because not that many studies have been done on a specific area and teachers need to know who exactly is doing the study and for what reason. The information is good, but other studies need to be looked at as well.

Shaywitz, B., Shaywitz, S., Blachman, B., Pugh, K., Fulbright, R., Skudlarski, P., Mencl, W., Constable, R., Holahan, J., Marchione, K., Fletcher, J., Lyon, G., & Gore, J. (2004).

Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically based intervention. Biological Psychiatry. 55 5 (926-933).

This study deals with imagery of children using magnetic resonance to find out what the effects would be in “phonologically based reading interventions on brain organization and reading fluency”. This study came about due to investigations that showed failure in part of the brain (left hemisphere), to function normally in students and adults that have reading disabilities. The many authors of this study hypothesized that reading interventions would improve reading fluency with the occipitotemporal with helps in reading. Seventy-seven children were used for this study, with the criteria being that their standard score was below 90on a Word Identification or Word Test of the Woodcock Achievement tests, (on average of two tests). One group received no interventions other than those that would have been provided in the school environment. (Speech, remedial, special education, resource and tutoring) In the experimental group, they were provided interventions of fifty minutes daily. This included individual tutoring and a 5-step process: 1. review of sound-symbol in the alphabet, 2. practices of phoneme analysis and blending by manipulating letter cards, 3. timed reading for fluency, 4. oral reading and 5. dictation of spelling with regular phoneme patterns. The intervention took eight months. Through MRI imaging taken during cross model letter identification tasks, the finding indicated that “ the nature of remedial educational interventions is critical to successful outcomes in children with reading disabilities and that the use of evidence based phonological reading interventions facilitates the development of those fast paced neural systems that underlie skilled reading.” In the summary it stated that “ intensive evidence-based phonological reading interventions brings about significant and durable changes in brain organizations so that brain activation patterns resemble those of typical readers with the appearance of the left occipitotemporal area and improvements in reading fluency.”

After reading this study I was assured that reading suggestions I have given to teachers and those used in my classroom in terms of reading interventions was a good strategy to help children in the understanding of reading.

Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2004). Research-Based Methods of Reading Instruction Grades K-3. ASCD (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Alexandria, VA.

This book contains a wealth of information for K-3 teachers using what has been researched in the area of reading from a science–based background to help students effectively read. It includes many activities that are designed to work with the students in the classroom setting that are validated by research. The activities are intended to work with all students regardless of any special case situations. Lessons are provided and have been used in the classroom setting and are designed for teachers to use easily in their established reading program. The reading elements covered in the book include: vocabulary: “effective vocabulary practices, assessing and the comprehension of vocabulary, and activities to promote vocabulary learning.” Comprehension: “the critical elements of reading comprehension, assessment practices, and instructional activities.” Phonemic awareness: “discussion of what phonemic awareness is, “the most complex part of a phonological awareness continuum that include rhyming and segmenting words and sentences, the ability to identify the phonemes of spoken language and how that can be separated and manipulated”, designing instructional lessons, and activities to promote phonemic awareness.” Phonics and word study: “the design of sequencing skills and those components that make a good instructional lesson.” Fluency: “how to teach fluency, monitoring the progression of fluency and activities to promote fluency in the classroom.”

All of these elements and the way they are presented make it easy for any teacher to follow and use in addition to the reading program they may currently use in their room. The school that I teach at currently was given this book from the county office. I was made aware of it at a faculty meeting, and checked it out for further investigation. The information in this book would be helpful to all teachers especially those not aware of what is involved in teaching reading.

Wagmeister, J. & Shifrin, B. (2000). Thinking Differently, Learning Differently. Educational Leadership. 11 58 (45-49).

This article discusses how the use of technology and brain based instruction can help students who have difficulties in learning to read and write are integrated. The Westmark School has revitalized their teaching through the latest neurological research in the school’s instruction and curriculum. They based their program on “ the theory that the brain responds to challenges, stimulation, and interactivitey and that it learns spontaneously”. This article states that a brain-based program “creates a safe, nurturing environment where children expand their knowledge and find patterns, make connections, and take risks.” By providing such a program learning can take place. This school provided multiple modalities in learning to let students, teachers, and parents know about their strengths in learning and learning styles. They implemented several ideas of brain research to make a learning environment, one rich with learning experiences and engaging activities (putting on a news broadcast), for those students with language based reading difficulties. They implemented thematic instruction with an integrated curriculum, which allowed students to build on previous learning and build on prior learning in patterning. They used musical stimulation to develop language and temporal and spatial development. By using multiple intelligences, they provided complex activities through different learning styles to make sense of diverse information. (i.e. field trips). By using multi-sensory specialized programs they knew that “these programs are based on brain plasticity which suggests that learning alters the functional organization of the brain.” Programs utilized for this were: Lindamood processes, Phonemic sequencing, (LIPS), Visualizing and Verbalizing, Symbol Imagery for Phonemic Awareness and Sight Words. These programs helped in sensory-cognitive skills, phonological awareness and written language skills. They learned that creating a safe learning environment allows the brain to respond in a non-threatening way. Through use of assistive technology and the many programs available in computer technology allows students to be in contact with numerous resources at their fingertips.

A teacher can collaboratively work with a student to understand strengths and needs as well as learning styles to make the learning effective. Teachers can make a difference in their student’s education by seeking information on what work in the area of brain research.

Walsh, P. (2000). A Hands-On approach to Understanding the Brain. Educational Leadership. 58 3 (76-78).

“Intelligence is a function of experience.” The information in this article assists in the understanding of the functions of the brain and strategies that could be useful in the classroom by integrating brain compatible techniques. The author highlights six areas in helping understand how brain functions are best utilized: absence of threat, procedures, facility design, cooperative learning, multiple intelligences and level of impact. In creating a classroom with out threat, the instructor limits the negative options in a learning situation. By providing a set of procedures, not just written, but also modeled, an experience can be created thus building familiarities in processing the information desired. Brain based research stated that by placing music, color, correct lighting, providing water when needed, and having plants, enhances learning in the facility design of a room. Cooperative learning can enhance learning in group dynamics intertwined with social and emotional communications that occur. Skills learned in this model will allow for respect to take place throughout the learning environment. Multiple intelligences taken from Howard Gardner’s theory combines the various intelligences and how they can overlap and work together to promote optimal learning. The article states that the brain needs “rich sensory stimulation” to learn. In providing levels of impact, one would provide such an environment, rich with “real world” experiences to process information for the best learning possible.

In reflecting on this article, I realized that I could relate to some of the strategies used. In my room I use water bottle, plants, lots of color, technology to expand on real world experiences, natural lighting, and music for transitioning. I try to incorporate cooperative learning activities when appropriate. Our school is currently doing Brain Booster workshops that incorporate multiple intelligences; I am using these strategies before reading time to see if it makes a difference in the performance of my students. I try to create a non-threatening environment by presenting a positive classroom atmosphere where all participants are respected in all areas of learning. When presenting information, I try to use body kinesthetic learning so that once modeled, the children can maximize on the learning taking place. This reminds me of the VAKT, where using visual, audio, kinesthetic, and tactile, can help children understand the concept being presented. All of the strategies in the article have merit and if tried a teacher may see increases in knowledge in their students.

Westwater, A., & Wolfe, P. (2000). The Brain-Compatible Curriculum. Educational Leadership. 11 58 (49-52).

This article discusses what many teachers may already know about brain research, “learning is linked to real-life experiences.” The brain’s main function is to find ways to survive; it is continually trying to find meaning of the environment and the information within it. At our present time, information comes at a fast pace, so learning it is not only vital to keeping up with the constant changes in our society, but it is a teachers job to provide as many resources as they can so students can make sense of those changes. When provided information, the brain tries to make sense through recognizing features or patterns and connect the new information to previously learned information through linking. “Educational researchers have demonstrated that previous experiences enhances the understanding of new information.” This can lead to good retention. Linking information though experiences can help students by “ already having some knowledge of the information and personalizing it, can give substance to the new information by providing interest. In the area of reading a way to do that would be by providing analogies, metaphors and similes.

Teachers who provide a meaningful curriculum help create new neural networking. They can do this by proving actual experiences in the classroom and school community using numerous resources. Story telling, Art, Music, Drama, games, mnemonics, graphic organizers and hands-on-experiences as well as debates can strengthen learning in the classroom.

Can brain based research help enhance reading?

My answer after researching brain-based information is yes. Can brain based research ideas help enhance reading for all readers? The answer is that it might be able to; a better answer is that it may make the process of learning to read a more enjoyable experience if some of the strategies are used in teaching reading. My findings for this question involved the understanding of how the brain works and situations that can help a learner learn better with certain elements present in a learning situation. As I learned in the articles I researched, if there are certain elements present in a learning situation optimal learning can take place. Elements presented in the articles that may enhance a learning situation in reading are: teach students about the brain itself, and explain how it functions, provide a non threatening, or low threat environment, provide a big picture of the learning about to take place where if needed written procedures are provided, provide a positive environment, provide interactive, challenging and engaging lessons where students are active participants in the lessons, provide real-life experiences and models when presenting information, create a supportive classroom built on respect, emotionally sound, and allow for humor to present, create an atmosphere where students can make connections through sensory modalities – VAKT, create experiences that are meaningful and personal for students so that strong connections can be made in learning, design the teaching environment where music, color, plants and lighting, and water is available.

All students want to learn. By teaching the students about how the brain functions through models, or using their hands as Patty Walsh described in her article, it can help visualize what the brain looks like. Is this important in reading? It is if it can help instill in students the importance of using the brain to gain knowledge. Some students are naturally curious about the “why” in the process of teaching a particular procedure being used. In teaching about the brain and how it functions it may make some students comfortable in their learning.

A non-threatening, or low threat environment allows for a student to engage in the lesson. Once threatened, their choice or option available to them is a negative one; they can become fatigued easily, and shut down to the learning situation. In a non-threatening classroom where respect is included, students will be comfortable and takes risks; they can envision possibilities in their learning.

The “big picture” provided by the teacher, allows the student to anticipate what will happen in the learning about to take place. Preparing students in their learning allows for connections to be made by the brain. The brain is constantly looking for patterns in prior learning to make sense of the world. The “big picture” allows time for the students to make sense of the lesson that is about to unfold. Along with the “big picture” is writing down an agenda, syllabus, or guidelines to help the student understand what is to take place. Organizing the learning taking place, helps students maximize time management in their school environment.

A positive environment allows for maximum learning to take place. This correlates with providing a non-threatening environment. When a positive atmosphere is present students become more interested in the material covered in the lesson; they are more likely to become engaged in the activities presented by the teacher. Some examples of a positive environment may include: keeping aware of the physical and visual areas of the room, and keeping in mind the emotional atmosphere of the room.

The brain is always looking for a challenge. It processes material through patterning and makes connections formed from experiences. By engaging students with an interactive classroom, it allows for growth to take place. Students who are provided models to understand concepts, and are taught using a variety of teaching strategies (VAKT, SQ3R, graphic organizers, charts, and guidelines analogies, and metaphors), allowing more opportunities for all students to learn. Alter the way information is presented, visually, orally, and contextually by making the information interesting. Use the “bob and weave” technique to reach all students. Teach utilizing cooperative learning so all children can engage in the lesson. A teacher who provides lots of information in stimulating and different types of texts to reach all readers can make a difference.

Integrating real life experiences can enhance learning for all students. The information becomes more meaningful and connections can be made when the student understands that it may make a difference to them. Some ways to provide real life experiences is by simulating stories through acting, providing simulated models of an activity, bringing in guest speakers on a noted subject, and taking field trips.

Character education is being utilized in schools more and more in this fast paced society. By building a classroom using the character traits such as respect, fairness, trustworthiness, responsibility, and caring it allows a student to emotionally become involved with the class as a whole knowing that a sense of community is being instilled. The student may become more involved knowing that negative traits will not be allowed in the room. This may be hard to do, but after time, and building a positive atmosphere, students will come to understand the workings of the classroom.

The design of the room can enhance the learning by providing plants that allow for not only oxygen to generate in the room, but the emotional aspect of a room that visually looks accepting and one that students would be willing to take risks in their assignments. Music can be used as a signal for transition times, alerting students for what may come next. Water can be used to hydrate the brain so it functions more clearly.

All of the above strategies can help create the best reading environment for children.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download