COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS



STATEMEMT OF PROCEEDINGS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

REGULAR MEETING

TUESDAY, JUNE 20, 2006, 9:00 AM

Board of Supervisors North Chamber

1600 Pacific Highway, Room 310, San Diego, California

MORNING SESSION – Meeting was called to order at 9:02 a.m.

Present: Supervisors Bill Horn, Chairman; Ron Roberts, Vice-Chairman; Greg Cox; Dianne Jacob; Pam Slater-Price; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.

Invocation was led by Pastor Dave Burgess from the First Presbyterian Church of Oceanside.

Pledge of Allegiance was led by members of Girl Scout Troop #3423: Carolina Romero, Monica Longworth, and Alexandra Delgado, Kelly Roberts, Lorelay Mendoza, Audrey Ross, and Jaclyn Ross.

Public Communication: [No Speakers]

AFTERNOON SESSION – Meeting was called to order at 2:05 p.m.

Present: Supervisors Bill Horn, Chairman; Ron Roberts, Vice-Chairman; Greg Cox; Dianne Jacob; Pam Slater-Price; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.

Time Certain:

|Time |Item |Subject |

| | | |

|2:00 P.M. |16. |BUDGET DELIBERATIONS |

|Category |Agenda No. |Subject |

|Public Safety |1. |SHERIFF’S ACCEPTANCE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE |

| | |CONTROL GRANT |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): UNANTICIPATED REVENUE FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT |

| | |OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL] |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

| |2. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF OUT-OF-COUNTRY TRAVEL |

| | | |

| |3. |SHERIFF DEPARTMENT’S HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) PROGRAM |

| | | |

| |4. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE BARONA BAND OF MISSION |

| | |INDIANS |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): REVENUE FROM BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS (BBMI)] |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

| |5. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF A BELL 407 HELICOPTER|

| | | |

|Health & Human Services |6. |FOSTERING HOPE FOR DEAF FOSTER TEENS |

| | | |

| |7. |SENIOR SERVICES REVENUE AGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): STATE GENERAL FUND, TITLES III AND VII OF THE OLDER AMERICANS |

| | |ACT, THE FEDERAL ADMINISTRATION ON AGING, FEDERAL AND STATE HICAP FUNDS, TITLE V |

| | |OF THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT, TITLE XIX MEDICAID, TITLE IIA CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL|

| | |& COMMUNITY SERVICE, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, AND THE |

| | |STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS] |

| | | |

| |8. |REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PLAN DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THE |

| | |CALIFORNIA CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW |

| | | |

|Community Services |9. |PROCUREMENT OF SPECIALTY LIBRARY MATERIALS AND SERVICES FOR THE COUNTY LIBRARY |

| | | |

| |10. |PROCUREMENT OF REFERENCE DATABASES, MAGAZINES, NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTIONS, AND |

| | |ASSOCIATED SERVICES FOR COUNTY LIBRARY BRANCHES |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |11. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES |

| | |DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE EUNICE ANN FINCH RESOURCE CENTER |

| | | |

| |12. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS (DISTRICT: 1) |

| | | |

| |13. |PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE RENEWALS |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): COUNTY GENERAL FUND AND THE AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND] |

| | | |

| |14. |AUTHORIZATION TO RETAIN OUTSIDE LEGAL AND FINANCIAL EXPERTS TO ADVISE THE COUNTY |

| | |REGARDING DISCUSSIONS INVOLVING CHARGERS’ STADIUM ISSUES |

| | | |

|Communications Received |15. |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |16. |BUDGET DELIBERATIONS |

| | |(Time Certain 2:00 p.m.) |

| | | |

|Appointments |17. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |APPOINTMENTS |

| | | |

|Public Safety |18. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP SUNSET REVIEW|

| | |OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |19. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION |

| | |ORDINANCE |

| | | |

| |20. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION |

| | |ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO NON-REPRESENTED CLASSES |

| | | |

| |21. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSTATION |

| | |ORDINANCE RELATING TO TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION FOR ELEVEN EMPLOYEE|

| | |BARGAINING UNITS REPRESENTED BY SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 2028 |

| | | |

| |22. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSTATION |

| | |ORDINANCE RELATING TO TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION FOR ONE EMPLOYEE |

| | |BARGAINING UNIT REPRESENTED BY SOCIAL SERVICES UNION, LOCAL 535, SERVICES |

| | |EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU |

| | | |

| |23. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSTATION |

| | |ORDINANCE RELATING TO TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION BY THE PROBATION |

| | |OFFICERS ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL |

| | |2028 |

| | | |

| |24. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION |

| | |ORDINANCE RELATING TO RATIFIED TENTATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR TWO EMPLOYEE BARGAINING |

| | |UNITS REPRESENTED BY THE SAN DIEGO DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSELS ASSOCIATION |

| | | |

| |25. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION |

| | |ORDINANCE RELATING TO RATIFIED TENTATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR TWO EMPLOYEE BARGAINING |

| | |UNITS REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY |

| | | |

| |26. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |CONTINUED NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: REQUEST TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO |

| | |AMEND PROBATION FEES |

| | | |

| |27. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS GRANTS (DISTRICT: 3) |

| | | |

| |28. |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 5) |

| | | |

| |29. |ALLOCATIONS OF DISTRICT TWO COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDS (DISTRICT: 2) |

| | | |

| |30. |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 4) |

| | | |

|Closed Session |31. |CLOSED SESSION |

| | | |

|Presentations/Awards |32. |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |

| | | |

|1. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S ACCEPTANCE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL GRANT |

| | |(DISTRICT: 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to authorize the acceptance of a $124,771 grant from the State of California Department of Alcoholic |

| |Beverage Control (ABC). The project goal is to identify problematic alcohol establishments, focusing on those that are |

| |selling to minors and/or having an excessive number of alcohol related crimes in the North County area. In addition to |

| |enforcement activities conducted on overtime, grant funds will be used to train patrol deputies on laws, enforcement |

| |strategies, ABC administrative procedures, educate business owners and their staff on laws, and educate North County youth |

| |about alcohol awareness. There is no local match requirement for this grant. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are not budgeted in the Sheriff’s Fiscal Year 2006-07 Revised CAO Proposed Budget. The funding source|

| |is unanticipated revenue from the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. If approved, this request |

| |will result in Fiscal Year 2006-07 cost and revenue of $124,771, and require the addition of zero staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts – Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery, which requires full |

| |cost recovery for grants and requires that Board approval be given in advance of application for funds. |

| |Ratify the submission and authorize the acceptance of a grant in the amount of $124,771 from the State of California |

| |Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for the Grant Assistance for Local Law Enforcement Agencies Project for the period |

| |July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. |

| |Authorize the expenditure contract to reimburse up to $15,000 in the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage |

| |Control overtime expenses incurred by the California State University San Marcos Police for grant activities during the |

| |period July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. |

| |Adopt a resolution entitled “RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO ACCEPTANCE OF |

| |GRANT FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL.” |

| | |

| | |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations in Fiscal Year 2006-07 of $124,771 in the Sheriff’s Department for salaries and benefits ($101,571) |

| |and services and supplies ($23,200) based on unanticipated revenue from the State of California Department of Alcoholic |

| |Beverage Control. (4 Votes) |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, |

| |adopting Resolution No. 06-104 entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO |

| |ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|2. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF OUT-OF-COUNTRY TRAVEL (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Per Board of Supervisors Policy D-7, Out-of-County Business and Related Guidelines and Processes, this is a request to |

| |approve the travel of one (1) Assistant Sheriff assigned to the Law Enforcement Services Bureau to Tel Aviv, Israel from June|

| |24 through July 3, 2006 to attend the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs’ (JINSA) Fifth Law Enforcement Exchange |

| |Program. JINSA will cover the costs for travel and accommodations. The Sheriff’s Department will be responsible for the |

| |County’s per diem rate for the cost of meals. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are included in the Sheriff’s Fiscal Year 2005-06 Operational Plan. The Jewish Institute for National|

| |Security Affairs has agreed to cover costs for travel and accommodations. No appropriations are requested at this time. The|

| |Assistant Sheriff will be receiving regular salary and benefits. The Sheriff’s Department will incur the per diem cost of |

| |meals totaling $368 pursuant to Section 472 of the San Diego County Code of Administrative Ordinances. No overtime will be |

| |generated as a result of this travel. If approved, this request will require the addition of zero staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Accept the gift from Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs of payment of travel expenses, excluding meals, for an |

| |assistant sheriff to attend the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs’ Fifth Law Enforcement Exchange Program from |

| |June 24 through July 3, 2006, in Tel Aviv, Israel, as a member of the United States’ delegation. |

| | |

| |Approve travel and per diem to Tel Aviv, Israel for one (1) Assistant Sheriff to attend the Jewish Institute for National |

| |Security Affairs’ Fifth Law Enforcement Exchange Program from June 24 through July 3, 2006. |

| |Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer, in consultation with the Sheriff, to select the Assistant Sheriff who will attend|

| |the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs’ Fifth Law Enforcement Exchange Program from June 24 through July 3, 2006.|

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|3. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF DEPARTMENT’S HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) has awarded a High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant to the |

| |Sheriff’s Department (subject to formal application) on behalf of all State and local law enforcement agencies participating |

| |in the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG). CBAG has requested that the Sheriff’s Department serve as the fiscal agency |

| |for HIDTA grant funds for the San Diego and Imperial County region. |

| | |

| |This is a request to authorize the Sheriff to apply for and accept these grant funds and to enter into an agreement with the |

| |California Border Alliance Group to serve as the fiscal agent for the Southwest Border High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area |

| |(HIDTA) grant program. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request have been included in the CAO’s Proposed FY 2006-08 Operational Plan Change Letter for the Sheriff’s |

| |Department. If approved, this request will result in $9,000,000 in cost and revenue and will require no additional staff |

| |years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29: Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts - Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery. |

| | |

| |Approve the submission of the application for funds by the Sheriff for $9,000,000 from the Office of National Drug Control |

| |Policy through the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) program for grant year 2006. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Sheriff to accept the grant award on behalf of participating agencies and to serve as the fiscal agent for the |

| |Southwest Border – CA High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) grant program. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|4. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS (DISTRICT: 2) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This letter requests approval for the execution of a five-year revenue agreement for law enforcement service between the |

| |County of San Diego and the Barona Band of Mission Indians (BBMI) for the period July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2011. If |

| |approved, this agreement will provide the Barona Band of Mission Indian with supplemental law enforcement services in and |

| |around the Barona Indian Reservation. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Funds for this request are not included in the Fiscal Year 2006-08 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. The funding source is |

| |revenue from Barona Band of Mission Indians (BBMI). If approved, this request will result in estimated first year operating |

| |costs of $350,000 and unanticipated revenue of $427,000 from BBMI. Second year costs are estimated to be $316,500 and revenue|

| |of $396,500. The remaining first year revenue of $77,000 and second year revenue of $80,000 will be used to offset overhead |

| |costs. Cost and revenue amounts will be adjusted for negotiated salary increases, other cost adjustments or service level |

| |changes. BBMI will purchase separately and retain ownership of Patrol 4x4 vehicles for use by the Special Purpose Officers |

| |(SPOs). Contract operating costs in Fiscal Year 2006-07 include vehicle fuel and maintenance of $16,400 incurred by the |

| |Sheriff’s Department for the BBMI vehicles. If approved, this request will require the addition of zero staff years. |

| | |

| |FLEET INTERNAL SERVICE FUND |

| |Adequate appropriations are included in the Fiscal Year 2006-08 CAO Proposed Operational Plan for the vehicle fuel and |

| |maintenance costs of this request. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts – Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery and requires docketing|

| |Revenue Contracts with the Board at least 60 days prior to effective date of contract. |

| | |

| |Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board to accept and execute, upon receipt, the five-year revenue agreement between the|

| |County of San Diego and the Barona Band of Mission Indians for two Special Purpose Officers (SPOs) to provide law enforcement|

| |services covering the agreement period of July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2011. |

| |Authorize the Sheriff to execute any amendments, and/or revisions due to changes in service level that do not materially |

| |impact or alter either the program or funding level. |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations of $350,000 in the Sheriff’s Department for the period July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007, to |

| |provide law enforcement services to the Barona Indian Reservation, based on unanticipated revenue from the Barona Band of |

| |Mission Indians. (4 VOTES) |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|5. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF A BELL 407 HELICOPTER |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On March 28, 2006 (3) your Board approved the Sheriff’s procurement of a Type II Communications Helicopter. Subsequent to |

| |that action, the Sheriff evaluated all the helicopters available in this class and has determined that only the Bell 407 |

| |meets the Department’s requirements. |

| |The efficiency involved in having helicopters from a common manufacturer is gained through cost savings in standardized |

| |flight training for pilots, as well as tooling and maintenance training costs. The Sheriff’s Department helicopter |

| |maintenance staff is trained and accustomed to working on Bell helicopters. This request is for approval of a sole source |

| |procurement of a Bell 407 Helicopter and Pilot training from Bell Helicopters. |

| |This new helicopters will require ongoing routine maintenance and on occasion, repairs from unforeseen damage. Only Bell |

| |Helicopter manufactured parts are authorized for use in these helicopters. Use of any other parts may void the warranty. |

| | |

| |After taking delivery of the helicopter, the Sheriff will need to outfit it with avionics, radios and other specialized |

| |equipment installed by a third party vendor. The Sheriff has identified several vendors capable of performing this service |

| |and requests authorization to issue a competitive solicitation for the outfitting of a Bell 407 Helicopter. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The funds for this request are included in the CAO Fiscal Year 2006-08 Proposed Operational Plan. The total cost of the |

| |helicopter is $1.9 million and will be offset by $450,625 from the 2004 State Homeland Security Equipment Grant and |

| |$1,449,375 from the 2004 Urban Area Security Initiative Grant, which are budgeted in the Office of Emergency Services. If |

| |approved, these recommendations will result in a one-time cost of $1,900,000. Ongoing, training, maintenance and operating |

| |costs for the helicopter, estimated at $468,000 annually, will be absorbed through a cost savings resulting from phasing out |

| |two existing aircraft. This request will require the addition of no staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Waive the advertising and competitive procurement requirements of Board Policy A-87. |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of the Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting to enter into negotiations with Bell Helicopters; and, subject to successful negotiations and |

| |determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract for the purchase of a Bell 407 Helicopter. |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Purchasing and Contracting Director |

| |to enter into negotiations with Bell Helicopters; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price, award a contract for Bell Helicopter parts and components for a five-year period. |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Purchasing and Contracting Director |

| |to enter into negotiations with Bell Helicopters; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price, award a contract for helicopter pilot training for a five-year period |

| |In accordance with Section 401, et. seq., of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director of the Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting to issue a competitive solicitation for the outfitting of the Bell 407 Helicopter, and upon |

| |successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract for the outfitting a Bell 407 |

| |Helicopter, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to approval of the |

| |Sheriff. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|6. |SUBJECT: |FOSTERING HOPE FOR DEAF FOSTER TEENS |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Currently, deaf foster children in San Diego County’s child welfare system who require a higher level of care are placed in |

| |group homes out-of-county or out-of-state, often as far away as Florida and Maryland. These out-of-county placements incur |

| |significant financial costs for the County and severe emotional costs for the children, who are separated from their family |

| |and community. Additionally, family reunification efforts can be extremely complicated due to the distance. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The funds for this request are not included in the Chief Administrative Officer’s Fiscal Year 2005-06 Proposed Operational |

| |Plan. If approved, this request will result in a one-time cost of $200,000 in Fiscal Year 2005-06, but will generate long |

| |term operating savings to the County of approximately $200,000 annually. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR COX AND SUPERVISOR ROBERTS: |

| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) to work with San Diego Youth and Community Services (SDYCS) to establish San |

| |Diego County’s first Deaf Group Home for teenage foster youth. |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations of $200,000 based on fund balance available in the general fund to allocate to SDYCS for the |

| |purchase of a home to be used as a group home for up to six deaf foster teens. |

| | |

| |Find that this grant serves a public purpose. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute an agreement with SDYCS establishing terms for receipt of these funds. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|7. |SUBJECT: |SENIOR SERVICES REVENUE AGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Health and Human Services Agency’s Aging & Independence Services division administers programs that benefit seniors and |

| |persons with disabilities. On June 21, 2005 (11), the Board approved revenue agreements for senior programs for Fiscal Year |

| |2005-06. The recommended actions in today’s item will authorize the annual revenue agreements for various programs funded by|

| |local, State, and federal sources for Fiscal Year 2006-07. |

| | |

| |The FY 2006-07 revenue agreements will provide funding for the following ongoing senior services: nutrition, information and |

| |assistance, case management, ombudsman, in-home, health promotion, caregiver, employment, intergenerational, and volunteer |

| |opportunities for seniors. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this request will |

| |result in Fiscal Year 2006-2007 costs of $15,278,021 revenue of $14,104,050 and $1,173,971 in County General Purpose Revenue |

| |required for matching costs. The funding sources are the State General Fund, Titles III and VII of the Older Americans Act, |

| |the federal Administration on Aging, federal and State HICAP funds, Title V of the Older Americans Act, Title XIX Medicaid, |

| |Title IIa Corporation for National & Community Service, the City of San Diego, the University of Maryland, and the State |

| |Department of Corporations. There will be no change in County General Purpose Revenue and no additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29: Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts - Department Responsibility for Full Cost Recovery. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, the following revenue agreements: |

| |Description Agreement # Amount |

| |State Department of Aging: |

| |Area Plan Grant AP-0607-23 $ 9,954,482 |

| |HICAP HI-0607-23 $ 598,264 |

| |Title V TV-0607-23 $ 606,742 |

| |MSSP MS-0607-07 $ 2,535,744 |

| |Corp. for National & Community Service $ 125,467 |

| |City of San Diego Nutrition $ 195,476 |

| |University of Maryland-Americorps $ 84,375 |

| |State Dept. of Corporations (SAIF) $ 3,500 |

| | |

| | |

| | |

| |3. Authorize the Clerk of the Board, subject to the approval of the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency or her |

| |designee, to execute subsequent amendments and renewals to the grant awards in Recommendations 2 when those documents are |

| |received from the funding sources and they do not materially impact either the grant programs or funding level. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|8. |SUBJECT: |REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PLAN DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA CHILD AND |

| | |FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |In 2001, the California Child Welfare System Improvement and Accountability System Act (AB 636) was implemented with the goal|

| |of improving child welfare outcomes pertaining to safety, permanence and child and family well-being. This goal is in |

| |alignment with your Board's long standing commitment to improving the welfare of children in San Diego County. The Act |

| |mandated the California Department of Social Services to facilitate a child welfare system review in each county beginning |

| |January 1, 2004. The California - Child and Family Services Review process has four main components: Quarterly County Data |

| |Reports, County Self-Assessment (CSA), System Improvement Plan (SIP) and Peer Quality Case Review (PQCR). On October 19, |

| |2004 (7), your Board approved the System Improvement Plan developed pursuant to the California – Child and Family Services |

| |Review. |

| |In August 2005, the State proposed a California - Child and Family Services Review triennial cycle in order to stagger |

| |reports due to them from counties. As a result, the County of San Diego modified timelines for SIP completion. Health and |

| |Human Services Agency, Child Welfare Services, completed a modified County Self Assessment and developed a new three-year |

| |System Improvement Plan with input from representatives from multiple public, private and community agencies involved in the |

| |child welfare system. |

| |As required by the State, the Board is requested to approve the County's new System Improvement Plan, which seeks to promote |

| |the following: safety in foster care placements, reunification of families, preservation of sibling relationships, post |

| |reunification support services for families, effective quality assurance, and an understanding of the overrepresentation of |

| |racial minority groups in the child welfare system. The Board-approved SIP will then be submitted to the State. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The SIP goals can be accomplished within the resources included in the CAO’s Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Years |

| |2006-08. If approved, the requested action will result in no change in current year costs and revenue. Further, there will |

| |be no change in the net General Fund costs and no additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve the System Improvement Plan, verifying public input as required by State regulations. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|9. |SUBJECT: |PROCUREMENT OF SPECIALTY LIBRARY MATERIALS AND SERVICES FOR THE COUNTY LIBRARY |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County Library provides customers with a wide variety of materials and educational and program services to meet the |

| |library’s mission of providing resources to meet the informational, recreational, and cultural needs of each community and to|

| |actively promote reading and lifelong learning. Often, these specialty materials and services are available from only |

| |individual vendors and adequate substitutes are not available to allow competitive procurements. If approved, today’s |

| |recommendation will allow the San Diego County Library to acquire materials and services directly from specialty vendors, |

| |when necessary. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this proposal are budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2006-08 Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this proposal will |

| |result in $463,000 annual cost, offset by budgeted County Library revenues. No additional staff years are required. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve and authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, in accordance with Board Policy A-87, to enter |

| |into negotiations and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, on a sole source |

| |basis, issue or amend purchase orders up to $50,000 each for unique specialty library materials and services, for three |

| |categories of contracts, specifically where no other similar materials supplier is available, no other similar program |

| |provider is available and no other similar acceptable supplier is available, subject to the approval of the Director, County |

| |Library and available funding; waive the advertising and letter request requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|10. |SUBJECT: |PROCUREMENT OF REFERENCE DATABASES, MAGAZINES, NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTIONS, AND ASSOCIATED SERVICES FOR |

| | |COUNTY LIBRARY BRANCHES (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County Library currently provides online reference databases that include general information, health information, |

| |telephone directory information, Spanish language, and basic business resources in order to expand and enhance high-quality |

| |information services to the public. Other databases now available to San Diego County Library customers include biography, |

| |history, comprehensive business, and literature. |

| | |

| |The requested action will synchronize contracts for Library databases and give the County Library and the Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting the ability to negotiate for new database products as they become available. The requested |

| |actions will authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting to execute a sole-source extension to the |

| |current contract for 13 online database services that will end June 30, 2006, allow competitive procurement of the full range|

| |of additional services that end between August 21, 2006 and June 1, 2007, and competitively procure all on-line database |

| |services for a period beginning January 1, 2008 and extending through December 31, 2012. |

| | |

| |The San Diego County Library also seeks a vendor for magazine and newspaper subscriptions and associated online services for |

| |the County Library branches. Market research has shown that there are several vendors providing these services to libraries |

| |in the United States and that each vendor has different strengths. If approved, this request would allow the procurement of|

| |services that would significantly automate manual tasks and provide the County with a wide range of resources. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are budgeted in the Fiscal Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this |

| |action will result in approximately $745,000 annual cost ($545,000 for databases and $200,000 for magazine/newspaper |

| |subscriptions and services), offset by budgeted County Library Fund revenue. No additional staff years are required. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve and authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting, in accordance with Board of Supervisors Policy A-87, to enter|

| |into negotiations with Morningstar; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, |

| |award a contract on a sole source basis for online reference databases of basic business resources, as well as for |

| |specialized biography, history, business, and literature online reference databases for a term ending December 31, 2007. |

| |Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |Approve and authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting, in accordance with Board of Supervisors Policy A-87, to enter|

| |into negotiations with the Gale Group for 12 specialty databases; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of|

| |a fair and reasonable price, award a contract on a sole source basis for online reference databases, including general |

| |information, health information, telephone directory information, and Spanish language, as well as for specialized biography,|

| |history, business, and literature online reference databases for a term ending December 31, 2007. Waive the advertising |

| |requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director, Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting to initiate a competitive solicitation to procure databases through a Request for Proposal (RFP). |

| |The databases procured through this process would include all databases with renewal dates between August 21, 2006 and June |

| |1, 2007. If, through the RFP process, there is only one respondent, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and |

| |Contracting, to enter into negotiations with respondent for procurement of these databases; and subject to successful |

| |negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, enter into a contract with respondent for a period of October |

| |1, 2006 through December 31, 2007 with five option years through December 31, 2012, and up to an additional six months if |

| |necessary, pending availability of funds; and to amend the contract as required for changes that do not materially impact or |

| |alter the program or cost, subject to the approval of the Director, San Diego County Library. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director, Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting to initiate a competitive solicitation to procure database services similar to those awarded as a |

| |sole source procurement to the Gale Group ending December 31, 2007 (Recommendation 1) through a RFP. If, through the RFP |

| |process, there is only one respondent, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into |

| |negotiations with respondent to procure specialty online database services; and subject to successful negotiations and |

| |determination of a fair and reasonable price, enter into a contract with respondent for a period of January 1, 2008 through |

| |December 31, 2008 for all needed databases with four option years through December 31, 2012, and up to an additional six |

| |months if necessary, pending availability of funds; and to amend the contract as required for changes that do not materially |

| |impact or alter the program or cost, subject to the approval of the Director, San Diego County Library. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director, Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting to initiate a competitive solicitation to procure magazine and newspaper subscriptions and |

| |services through a RFP. If, through the RFP process, there is only one respondent, authorize the Director, Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into negotiations with respondent for magazine and newspaper subscriptions and services;|

| |and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, enter into a contract with |

| |respondent for a period of July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007 with five option years through June 30, 2012, and up to an |

| |additional six months if necessary, pending availability of funds; and to amend the contract as required for changes that do |

| |not materially impact or alter the program or cost, subject to the approval of the Director, San Diego County Library. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|11. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY|

| | |FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE EUNICE ANN FINCH RESOURCE CENTER |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Eunice Ann Finch Resource Center, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the “Borrower”), has requested that |

| |the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the “Authority”) via an application the issuance of tax-exempt |

| |obligations in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000. The funds will be used for the benefit of the Borrower or an affiliate |

| |thereof pursuant to the Government Code of the State, to (1) finance and refinance the cost of the acquisition and |

| |improvement by the Borrower or an affiliate thereof of certain property, including real and personal property, to be used as,|

| |or as a part of, the Fred Finch Youth Center, a youth center providing educational, mental health and other social services |

| |for disadvantaged children (the “Project”), and (2) pay certain costs of issuance related thereto. |

| | |

| |Section 9 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, requires the local member to approve the project and the issuance of |

| |bonds before the CSCDA may issue bonds and to hold a public hearing for purposes of satisfying the public approval |

| |requirement of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) of 1986. Similar approvals have been given to other |

| |conduits financed by CSCDA. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |If approved, this proposal will result in a one-time $1,000 application fee. These monies will be deposited into the County’s|

| |Investor Relation Program as approved by the Board of Supervisors in the County’s Long-Term Obligations Management Policy |

| |(B-65). No additional staff years will be required. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND DEBT ADVISORY COMMITTEE |

| |1. Pursuant to section 147 (f) of the Internal Revenue Code, hold a public hearing regarding the financing of the project. |

| | |

| |2. Adopt the resolution approving the tax-exempt financing by the Authority to issue up to $3,000,000 of tax-exempt |

| |obligations for the benefit of the Eunice Ann Finch Resource Center or an affiliate thereof. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board closed the Hearing and took action as |

| |recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution No. 06-105 entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF |

| |SAN DIEGO APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $3,000,000 |

| |AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE AUTHORITY’S NOTES, BONDS OR OTHER EVIDENCE OF INDEBTEDNESS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE EUNICE |

| |ANN FINCH RESOURCE CENTER OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING AND REFINANCING THE ACQUISITION AND |

| |IMPROVEMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY, INCLUDING REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, PROVIDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SUCH NOTES, |

| |BONDS OR OTHER EVIDENCE OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO HEREIN SPECIFIED. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|12. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS (DISTRICT: 1) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County of San Diego is fortunate to have an opportunity to reinvest taxpayer money into our communities for the benefit |

| |of the public. This action will assist the County in meeting the needs of individuals and families. |

| | |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The fiscal impact of the proposed recommendations is $498,340.00. These actions will result in the addition of no staff |

| |years and no future costs. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR COX |

| |Allocate $15,000 from the Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to the City of Imperial Beach, Project Code SE0506 for costs |

| |associated with the City’s 50th Anniversary events in 2006. |

| |Allocate $200,000 from Community Projects Budget (Org 15650) to the City of San Diego for a portion of the costs for the |

| |City’s Park and Recreation Department to construct restrooms and other amenities at the staging area in the Otay Valley |

| |Regional Park. |

| |Allocate $15,740 from the Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to the Coronado Community Theatre, Inc. for the purchase of |

| |theatre, sound, lighting and computer equipment and supplies. |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to the Gladiator School of Martial Arts and Boxing for the |

| |purchase of gym and computer equipment. |

| |Allocate $13,600 from the Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to Lords Gym of San Diego for the purchase of a sound system.|

| |Allocate $11,000 from the Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to the San Diego Filipino-American Humanitarian Foundation, |

| |Inc. for exhibits, materials and facility improvements. |

| |Allocate $100,000 from the Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to the San Diego Fire Rescue Foundation for the purchase at |

| |least 70 Automatic External Defibrillators (AEDs) to be distributed to each school in the following South San Diego County |

| |school districts: Chula Vista Elementary, Coronado Unified, National, San Ysidro Unified, South Bay Union and Sweetwater |

| |Union. |

| |Transfer $83,000 from Community Projects Budget (Org 15650) to the Department of Parks and Recreation (Org. 52811, Account |

| |52370) for a portion of the costs for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to construct a bridge over the Sweetwater River east|

| |of the Sweetwater Reservoir. |

| |Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer, or a designee, to negotiate, execute, and manage an agreement between the County |

| |of San Diego and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the County’s contribution toward the total cost for the U.S. Fish and|

| |Wildlife Service to construct the bridge described in Recommendation 8, including any amendments to the agreement that do not|

| |increase the County’s cost. |

| | |

| | |

| |Transfer $55,000 from Community Projects Budget (Org 15650) to the Department of Parks and Recreation (Org 52821, Account |

| |52370) for additional work on the Environmental Impact Report for the Tijuana River Valley Trails and Habitat project. |

| |Find that the grant awards described above have a public purpose. |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with the organizations listed in recommendations 1 through |

| |7, establishing terms for the receipt of the funds described above. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|13. |SUBJECT: |PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE RENEWALS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Your Board is requested to ratify the Risk Manager’s renewal of various property and casualty insurance policies. Approval |

| |of the recommended actions will result in continued insurance coverage and takes advantage of reduced rates through a pooled |

| |approach with other California Counties in the global marketplace. The proposed expenditures for insurance reflect a |

| |$220,835 (10.2%) increase over last fiscal year. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are budgeted. If approved, this request will result in $2,377,424 in current year costs, and will not |

| |require the addition of staff years. The funding sources are the County General Fund ($2,275,424), and the Airport |

| |Enterprise Fund ($102,000). |

| |RECOMMENDATION(S): |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Ratify the purchase of the following insurance and approval of coverage in coverage form: |

| | |

| |All-risk property policy, including boiler & machinery, sabotage and terrorism coverage and earthquake, rental interruption |

| |for specified locations, from CSAC Excess Insurance Authority for $1,639,298; |

| | |

| |Employee theft policy including faithful performance of duty coverage from CSAC Excess Insurance Authority for $129,626. |

| |Approve policy form change to Government Crime Policy; |

| | |

| |Aircraft hull and liability policy from American Home Assurance Company through AIG Aviation Insurance Services for |

| |$498,000; |

| | |

| |Airport comprehensive general liability policy from American Home Assurance Company through AIG Aviation Insurance Services |

| |for $102,000. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|14. |SUBJECT: |AUTHORIZATION TO RETAIN OUTSIDE LEGAL AND FINANCIAL EXPERTS TO ADVISE THE COUNTY REGARDING |

| | |DISCUSSIONS INVOLVING CHARGERS’ STADIUM ISSUES (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On May 16, 2006 (13) your Board established an ad hoc San Diego Chargers Stadium Sub-Committee, and appointed Vice-Chairman |

| |Ron Roberts and Supervisor Dianne Jacob to the Subcommittee. The Subcommittee will act as the Board’s contact for any |

| |inquiries or information requests from the San Diego Chargers or from any other interested party regarding the search for a |

| |suitable location within San Diego County to site a new football stadium. |

| | |

| |This agenda item requests that your Board authorize the County Counsel and the Chief Financial Officer to conduct a |

| |competitive process to retain legal and financial experts. Once selected, these experts will be immediately available to |

| |provide advice in the event there is a need for such assistance in connection with the Subcommittee’s discussions with the |

| |Chargers or other parties involving Chargers’ stadium issues. |

| | |

| | |

| |In addition, on December 9, 1997 (32), your Board determined that it is the policy of the Board to require an election before|

| |County resources may be used to support the development or renovation of any Professional Sports Facility. This action does |

| |not trigger an election under your Board’s policy because the retention of outside legal and financial experts is not for the|

| |development or renovation of the Chargers’ stadium. Rather, the use of outside experts is for the limited purpose of only |

| |providing advice to the County on issues that may arise in the Subcommittee’s discussions with the Chargers or other parties |

| |concerning any possibilities and alternatives associated with a Chargers’ stadium. |

| | |

| |In the event your Board determines that the County should be involved in some capacity with the actual development or |

| |renovation of the Chargers’ stadium, your Board’s policy established on December 9, 1997, unless amended or repealed, would |

| |require an election before County resources may be used in direct support of such a development or renovation project. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The fiscal impact is unknown at this time because no need has arisen yet for using legal and financial experts in connection |

| |with Chargers’ stadium issues. In addition, in the event the Subcommittee’s discussions give rise to a need for any legal |

| |and financial expertise, there is no way of knowing at this time what the scope of those discussions will be. A fiscal |

| |impact report regarding the potential costs associated with outside legal and financial experts will be provided to your |

| |Board with the agenda item, if any, which asks for your Board to approve some form of County involvement in a Chargers’ |

| |stadium project. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Authorize the County Counsel to: (a) issue a Request for Proposals, which seeks competitive proposals from qualified law |

| |firms, for the purpose of providing expert legal assistance and advice to the County regarding discussions involving any |

| |Chargers’ stadium issues, and (b) negotiate with and enter into an agreement with the most qualified law firm. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to: (a) issue a Request for Proposals, which seeks competitive proposals from qualified|

| |financial advisors, for the purpose of providing expert financial assistance and advice to the County regarding discussions |

| |involving any Chargers’ stadium issues, and (b) negotiate with and enter into an agreement with the most qualified financial |

| |advisor. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|15. |SUBJECT: |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED (DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Board Policy A-72, Board of Supervisors Agenda and Related Process, authorizes the Clerk of the Board to prepare a |

| |Communications Received for Board of Supervisors' Official Records. Routine informational reports, which need to be brought |

| |to the attention of the Board of Supervisors yet not requiring action, are listed on this document. Communications Received |

| |documents are on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Not Applicable. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |

| |Note and file. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|16. |SUBJECT: |BUDGET DELIBERATIONS (DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Board received the Chief Administrative Officer 2006 – 2007 and 2007 – 2008 Proposed Operational Plan on May 16, 2006 |

| |(19). Public Hearings on the Budget took place June 7 -16, 2006. Today has been set for Board Deliberations on the |

| |Budget. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |

| |Conduct Budget Deliberations. |

|16.1 |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors directed the Chief Administrative |

| |Officer to include one-time funding in the 2006-2007 Budget in the amount of $50,000 for the preparation of the ballot |

| |materials and engineers’ report to establish a CSA or other park maintenance facility and $150,000 for the ongoing costs |

| |for the 18 months needed to sustain Jess Martin Park until a park maintenance funding entity is established. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price |

| |NOES: Roberts, Horn |

|16.2 |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors accepted the appropriation funding and |

| |staffing changes to the fiscal year 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 Chief Administrative Officer’s proposed Operational Plan and |

| |approved the Board members’ Community Enhancement allocations. This action gives direction to the Chief Administrative |

| |Officer and the Chief Financial Officer to make adjustments as necessary between the object accounts with no increases in |

| |total departments’ appropriations and to bring back for formal adoption the Budget resolution to the Board of Supervisors. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|17. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |APPOINTMENTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |These appointments are in accordance with applicable Board Policy A–74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions |

| |and Committees and Board Policy I–1, Planning and Sponsor Group Policies and Procedures. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR JACOB |

| |Appoint ruth d’Spain to the Descanso Community Planning Group, Seat No. 1, for a term to expire January 5, 2009. |

| |SUPERVISOR SLATER-PRICE: |

| |Appoint Charles Bull to the public member seat of the Air Pollution Control District Advisory Committee, for a term as |

| |prescribed by County Ordinance. |

| |Appoint Ronald Morrow as an alternate member to the Assessment Appeals Board No. 1 for a term as prescribed by County |

| |Ordinance. |

| |Appoint Paul Cooley to the Flood Control District Advisory Commission, for a term as prescribed by County Ordinance. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | |

| |Clarification of appointment terms: Charles Bull for a term to expire January 5, 2009; Ronald Morrow for a term to expire |

| |September 3, 2007; and Paul Cooley for a term to expire January 5, 2009. |

| |

|18. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP SUNSET REVIEW OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY|

| | |BOARD POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 13, 2006 (7), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended introducing Ordinance for further consideration and|

| |adoption on June 20, 2006. |

| |In accordance with Board Policy, A-76, Sunset Review, the Public Safety Group periodically reviews certain Board policies and|

| |County Administrative Code provisions to ensure that obsolete policies and code provisions are deleted and remaining policies|

| |and code provisions reflect current standards and practices. |

| |Based on the Sunset Review Process, Public Safety Group has reviewed Board Policy A-92 (Juvenile Justice), County |

| |Administrative Code Article III (General Rules), County Administrative Code Article XXA (Juvenile Facilities), and County |

| |Administrative Code Article XVIII (Law Enforcement Review Board) and recommends revisions for Board approval. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO GENERAL RULES, JUVENILE FACILITIES, |

| |AND THE CITIZENS LAW ENFORCEMENT REVIEW BOARD. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, |

| |adopting Ordinance No. 9782 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO |

| |JUVENILE FACILITIES AND CITIZENS LAW ENFORCEMENT REVIEW BOARD. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|19. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE (DISTRICT: |

| | |ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 13, 2006 (14), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended introducing Ordinances for further consideration |

| |and adoption on June 20, 2006. |

| |The proposed amendments to the San Diego County Compensation Ordinance are part of the ongoing effort to manage and maintain |

| |a skilled and competent workforce dedicated to sustaining operational excellence and serving the public. These amendments |

| |include: establishing and renaming classifications to reflect organizational changes, adjusting salaries in selected |

| |classifications to be competitive to attract qualified candidates, and amending sections of the Compensation Ordinance. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinances entitled: |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION. |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, SECTION 496, PERTAINING TO AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, |

| |adopting Ordinance No. 9783 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED |

| |CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND COMPENSATION; and Ordinance No. 9784 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE |

| |ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, SECTION 496, PERTAINING TO AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|20. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO |

| | |NON-REPRESENTED CLASSES (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 13, 2006 (15), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended introducing Ordinances for further consideration |

| |and adoption on June 20, 2006. |

| |This proposed amendment to the San Diego County Compensation Ordinance increases the compensation rate for step and broad |

| |banded classes in the Classified Service designated CE, CEM, MA and SO classes. The salary increase percentages are |

| |identical to those negotiated with the largest employee associations: 3.5% (F.Y. 06-07), 3.0% (F.Y. 07-08) and 3.5% (F.Y. |

| |08-09) with 10% Flexible Benefit increase each year for Classified non-represented classes. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE FOR CLASSES DESIGNATED CE, CEM, MA, AND SO. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, |

| |adopting Ordinance No. 9785 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE FOR CLASSES DESIGNATED CE, |

| |CEM, MA, AND SO. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|21. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE RELATING TO |

| | |TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION FOR ELEVEN EMPLOYEE BARGAINING UNITS REPRESENTED BY SERVICE |

| | |EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 2028 (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 13, 2006 (16), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended introducing Ordinance for further consideration |

| |and adoption on June 20, 2006 and as the date for consideration and approval of the ratified Memoranda of Agreement between |

| |the County and the Service Employee’s International Union, Local 2028. |

| |This action: 1) presents Compensation Ordinance amendments for a second reading of negotiated provisions in four Memoranda of|

| |Agreement between the County and the Service Employees International Union, Local 2028 currently undergoing the ratification |

| |process; 2) adds wage increases; 3) mutually agrees to establish a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) or other |

| |retiree medical trust; 4) adds equity adjustments for specific classes; and 5) adds premiums and other benefits. |

| | |

| |Tentative Agreement was reached by County representatives with the Service Employees International Union, Local 2028 on June |

| |3, 2006. This agreement is a three-year term. |

| |The Tentative Agreement is now undergoing the ratification process. The Union will inform the County of the results of the |

| |voting by noon on June 16. The Memoranda of Agreement for all units that ratify will be presented to your Board for |

| |consideration and Approval on June 20, 2006. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The increased costs associated with this contract are: |

| |2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 |

| |Wages $19,014,599 $35,883,264 $56,153,777 |

| |Health $3,355,789 $7,047,157 $14,463,451 Total $22,370,388 $42,930,421 $70,617,228 |

| |The implementation of this salary adjustment will have no negative effect on the funding status of the County Employee |

| |Retirement System (CERS).  Funds for this recommendation are included in the 2006-07 budget.  |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| | |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION. |

| |Ratify the Memoranda of Agreement between the County and the Service Employee’s International Union, Local 2028. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, |

| |adopting Ordinance No. 9786 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED |

| |CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND COMPENSATION. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|22. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSTATION ORDINANCE RELATING TO |

| | |TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION FOR ONE EMPLOYEE BARGAINING UNIT REPRESENTED BY SOCIAL |

| | |SERVICES UNION, LOCAL 535, SERVICES EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU) (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 13, 2006 (17), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended introducing Ordinances for further consideration |

| |and adoption on June 20, 2006 and as the date for consideration and approval of the ratified Memoranda of Agreement between |

| |the County and the Social Services Union, Local 535, SEIU. |

| |This action: 1) presents Compensation Ordinance amendments for a second reading of negotiated provisions for a Memoranda of |

| |Agreement between the County and the Social Services Union, Local 535, SEIU, currently undergoing the ratification process; |

| |2) adds wages; 3) mutually agrees to establish a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) or other retiree medical |

| |trust; 4) enhances a premium and other benefits. |

| |Tentative Agreement was reached by County representatives with the Social Services Union, Local 535, SEIU, on June 3, 2006. |

| |This agreement is a three-year term. |

| |The Tentative Agreement is now undergoing the ratification process. The Union will inform the County of the results of the |

| |voting by noon on June 18. The Memoranda of Agreement for all units that ratify will be presented to your Board for |

| |consideration and Approval on June 20, 2006. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The increased costs associated with this contract are: |

| |2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 |

| |Wages $4,516,619 $8,523,505 $13,338,447 |

| |Health $929,773 $1,952,523 $4,007,322 |

| |Total $5,446,392 $10,476,028 $17,345,769 |

| | |

| |The implementation of this salary adjustment will have no negative effect on the funding status of the County Employee |

| |Retirement System (CERS).  Funds for this recommendation are included in the 2006-07 budget.  |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| | |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION. |

| | |

| | |

| |Ratify the Memoranda of Agreement between the County and the Social Services Union, Local 535, SEIU. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, |

| |adopting Ordinance No. 9786 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED |

| |CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND COMPENSATION. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|23. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSTATION ORDINANCE RELATING TO |

| | |TENTATIVE AGREEMENT PENDING RATIFICATION BY THE PROBATION OFFICERS ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY SERVICE |

| | |EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 2028 (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 13, 2006 (18), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended introducing Ordinances for further consideration |

| |and adoption on June 20, 2006 and as the date for consideration and approval of the ratified Memoranda of Agreement between |

| |the County and the Probation Officers Association. |

| | |

| |This action: 1) presents Compensation Ordinance amendments for a second reading of negotiated provisions for a Memoranda of |

| |Agreement between the County and the Probation Officers Association currently undergoing the ratification process; 2) adds |

| |wage increases; 3) mutually agrees to establish a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) or other retiree medical |

| |trust; 4) adds premiums and other benefits. |

| | |

| |Tentative Agreement was reached by County representatives with the Probation Officers Association, represented by the Service|

| |Employees International Union, Local 2028, on June 3, 2006. This agreement is a three-year term. |

| | |

| |The Tentative Agreement is now undergoing the ratification process. The Union will inform the County of the results of the |

| |voting by noon on June 16. The Memoranda of Agreement, if ratified by the Probation Officers Association, will be presented |

| |to your Board for consideration and Approval on June 20, 2006. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The increased costs associated with this contract are: |

| |2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 |

| |Wages $2,184,190 $4,121,878 $6,450,333 |

| |Health $351,967 $739,131 $1,516,978 |

| |Total $2,536,157 $4,861,009 $7,967,311 |

| | |

| |The implementation of this salary adjustment will have no negative effect on the funding status of the County Employee |

| |Retirement System (CERS).  Funds for this recommendation are included in the 2006-07 budget.  |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION. |

| | |

| |Ratify the Memoranda of Agreement between the County and the Probation Officers Association. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, |

| |adopting Ordinance No. 9786 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED |

| |CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND COMPENSATION. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|24. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE RELATING TO |

| | |RATIFIED TENTATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR TWO EMPLOYEE BARGAINING UNITS REPRESENTED BY THE SAN DIEGO DEPUTY |

| | |COUNTY COUNSELS ASSOCIATION (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 13, 2006 (22), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended introducing Ordinances for further consideration |

| |and adoption on June 20, 2006 and as the date for consideration and approval of the ratified Memoranda of Agreement between |

| |the County and the San Diego Deputy County Counsels Association. |

| |This action: 1) presents Compensation Ordinance amendments for a second reading of negotiated provisions for a Memoranda of |

| |Agreement between the County and the San Diego Deputy County Counsels Association; 2) adds wages; 3) mutually agrees to |

| |establish a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) or other retiree medical trust; 4) enhances other benefits. |

| | |

| |Tentative Agreement was reached by County representatives with the San Diego County Deputy County Counsels Association, on |

| |June 6, 2006. The agreement was ratified on June 14, 2006 by the Deputy County Counsels Association. This agreement is a |

| |three-year term. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The increased costs associated with this contract are: |

| |2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 |

| |Wages $378,834 $714,914 $1,118,770 |

| |Health $34,168 $71,753 $113,096 |

| |Total $413,002 $786,667 $1,231,866 |

| | |

| |The implementation of this salary adjustment will have no negative effect on the funding status of the County Employee |

| |Retirement System (CERS).  Funds for this recommendation are included in the 2006-07 budget.  |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION. |

| | |

| |Ratify the Memoranda of Agreement between the County and the San Diego Deputy County Counsels Association. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, |

| |adopting Ordinance No. 9786 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED |

| |CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND COMPENSATION. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|25. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE RELATING TO |

| | |RATIFIED TENTATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR TWO EMPLOYEE BARGAINING UNITS REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC DEFENDER |

| | |ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 13, 2006 (23), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended introducing Ordinances for further consideration |

| |and adoption on June 20, 2006 and as the date for consideration and approval of the ratified Memoranda of Agreement between |

| |the County and the Public Defenders Association of San Diego County. |

| |This action: 1) presents Compensation Ordinance amendments for a second reading of negotiated provisions for a Memoranda of |

| |Agreement between the County and the Public Defender Association of San Diego County; 2) adds wages; 3) mutually agrees to |

| |establish a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) or other retiree medical trust; 4) enhances other benefits. |

| |Tentative Agreement was reached by County representatives with the Public Defender Association of San Diego County, on June 6,|

| |2006. The agreement was ratified on June 13, 2006 by the Deputy Public Defenders Association. This agreement is a three-year|

| |term. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The increased costs associated with this contract are: |

| |2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 |

| |Wages $1,303,930 $2,460,701 $3,850,756 |

| |Health $119,938 $251,870 $396,995 |

| |Total $1,423,868 $2,712,571 $4,247,751 |

| | |

| |The implementation of this salary adjustment will have no negative effect on the funding status of the County Employee |

| |Retirement System (CERS).  Funds for this recommendation are included in the 2006-07 budget.  |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinances entitled: |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION. |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 495 RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION REIMBURSEMENT. |

| | |

| |Ratify the Memoranda of Agreement between the County and the Public Defenders Association of San Diego County. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting|

| |Ordinance No. 9786 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED CLASSIFICATIONS,|

| |CHARACTERISTICS, AND COMPENSATION; and Ordinance No. 9787 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY |

| |ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION REIMBURSEMENT |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|26. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |CONTINUED NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: REQUEST TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROBATION FEES|

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 13, 2006 (24), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended introducing Ordinances for further consideration |

| |and adoption on June 20, 2006. |

| |This is a request to adopt an Ordinance amending Section 363 of the County Administrative Code relating to fees and charges |

| |imposed by the County’s Probation Department. |

| |The Probation Department’s fees and charges are based on actual costs and workload and represent the full cost to the County |

| |to incarcerate and supervise juveniles who are wards of the Court, and to provide adult probation services. It is the legal |

| |responsibility of adults and children’s parents to reimburse the County for Probation expenses. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 363 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF |

| |PROBATION FEES AND CHARGES |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting|

| |Ordinance No. 9788 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 363 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO|

| |THE ESTABLISHMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF PROBATION FEES AND CHARGES. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|27. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS GRANTS (DISTRICT: 3) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Funding for the Community Projects Grant program was included in the fiscal year 2005-2006 adopted budget in order to further |

| |public purposes throughout the County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The current year total combined cost of these 42 projects is $730,700. The funding source is the Community Projects Budget |

| |(org 0263). This will result in the addition of no staff years and no future year costs. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR SLATER-PRICE |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Scripps Ranch Fires Safe Council to assist with |

| |costs related to brush cleaning and fire abatement programs. |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Del Mar Historical Society for activities taking |

| |place during the “Del Mar Celebrate History Week.” |

| |Allocate $7,200 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to North County Health Services to fund two health and |

| |dental fairs in District Three. |

| |Allocate $14,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Aquatic Adventures to purchase aquarium equipment and |

| |supplies for their new facility. |

| | |

| | |

| |Allocate $6,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Dieguito Youth Softball League to assist with |

| |the purchase of uniforms and equipment. |

| |Allocate $2,700 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Carlsbad Hi Noon Rotary Club Foundation for the 2nd|

| |annual music festival. |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Evoke Dance to assist with costs associated with |

| |conducting the “Celebrate Dance Festival.” |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Fern Street Community Arts Inc. to assist with costs |

| |associated with conducting their neighborhood tour within District Three. |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to First Night Escondido to assist with costs associated |

| |with putting on their annual New Year’s Eve “Celebration of the Arts Festival.” |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Quail Botanical Gardens for their water conservation |

| |program. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Mira Mesa Theatre Guild to establish a Youth |

| |Theatre Program and assists with outreach and promotional programs. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Dieguito River Valley JPA for Del Dios Gorge |

| |Trail Interpretive signs and Scout/Youth programs within District Three. |

| |Allocate $2,800 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Cardiff Botanical Society to purchase plants, |

| |trees, and native vegetation for Carpentier Park. |

| |Allocate $13,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Rancho Coastal Humane Society to assist with costs|

| |associated with purchasing a pick-up truck and landscaping and maintenance equipment. |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Classics for Kids to produce orchestral concerts and |

| |educational outreach programs in District Three. |

| |Allocate $21,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Junior Theatre to upgrade internet and |

| |online ticketing capabilities at the La Jolla Firehouse YMCA ($6,000) and for a ticket subsidy programs within District Three |

| |($15,000). |

| | |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Sierra Club for the “San Diego Canyons and Creeks |

| |Preservation” project. |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Civic Youth Orchestra Inc. for concerts and educational|

| |outreach in District Three. |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Encinitas Senior Foundation to purchase of four |

| |wheelchairs. |

| |Allocate $3,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to La Jolla Parks Inc. to offset costs associated with |

| |putting on the second annual “Movies by the Sea” community event. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Lambs Players Theatre to assist with costs of |

| |conducting outreach programs for primary and secondary students in District Three. |

| |Allocate $15,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Malashock Dance to assist with production and |

| |distribution costs associated with the “Fathom” project |

| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Mingei International Inc. to fund international art |

| |exhibits and educational outreach programs at their Escondido site. |

| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego to assist |

| |with educational programs and promotional and marketing materials for their La Jolla facility. |

| |Allocate $200,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Old Globe Theatre to assist with theatre |

| |productions and educational and community outreach programs. |

| |Allocate $4,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Audubon Society for activities taking |

| |place in District Three during the 11th Annual San Diego Bird Festival. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Ballet to assist with putting on |

| |performances throughout San Diego County during their 2006 season. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Bowl Game Association for marketing and |

| |promotional costs for the Holiday Bowl. |

| | |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Children’s Choir for educational |

| |outreach programs in District Three. |

| |Allocate $15,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Dance Theatre for their 2006-2007 season|

| |of professional modern dance performances to include “Trolley Dances” and “Cabaret Dances.” |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Master Chorale to assist with costs |

| |associated with putting on their 2006-2007 concert season. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Railroad Museum to purchase and update |

| |brochures, rack cards, and newsletters. |

| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Opera for opera productions and |

| |educational outreach activities. |

| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Repertory Theatre for costs associated |

| |with putting on their 31st season. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Shakespeare Society, Inc. for their |

| |“Student Shakespeare Festival” and to help offset the costs of promotional materials, educational information, and |

| |instructional classes associated with the Festival |

| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Society of Natural History to assist |

| |with costs associated with the Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit. |

| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Space and Science Foundation for their |

| |“More Than Meets the Eye: The Science of Seeing” exhibit. |

| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Symphony Orchestra Association for music|

| |education and community outreach in District Three. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Youth Symphony for educational outreach |

| |programs in District Three. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Sledgehammer Theatre, Inc. to assist with |

| |productions costs associated with putting on their 21st season. |

| | |

| |Allocate $4,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Visual Arts Foundation to assist with outreach and |

| |educational activities in District Three. |

| |Allocate $3,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Cygnet Theatre Company to assist with production |

| |costs associated with putting on their 2006-2007 season. |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with these organizations establishing terms for receipt of |

| |the funds described above. |

| |Find that all grant awards described above have a public purpose. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|28. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Community Projects Funding assists non-profit organizations in providing essential services to citizens of San Diego County. |

| |Reinvesting taxpayer money in worthwhile organizations is a benefit to the citizens and communities of North County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHAIRMAN HORN: |

| |Find that the allocations to the Montezuma Valley Historical Society, TERI, Inc., Pauma Valley Community Association and Reche|

| |Community Club are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301. |

| |Allocate $7,500.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Montezuma Valley Historical Society to add a storage facility|

| |and air conditioning to its Community Center. |

| |Allocate $10,500.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Warner Springs Community Resource Center for a printer, |

| |printing supplies, a large tourist map, and newsletter design. |

| |Allocate $15,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Fallbrook Music Society to partially cover the cost of the |

| |Symphony Pops on the Green concert. |

| |Allocate $45,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Sunshine Summit Volunteer Fire Department for a new truck. |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Special Olympics North San Diego for the Seussical the Musical |

| |preview night. |

| |Allocate $14,400.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Alta Vista Gardens for the costs of removing 40 dead trees |

| |from Brengle Terrace Park in Vista. |

| |Allocate $50,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to TERI, Inc. for construction costs associated with renovating the|

| |McNealy House. |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Boys & Girls Club of Oceanside to match funds raised at the |

| |6th Annual Luau event to pay for event expenses. |

| |Allocate $15,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Pauma Valley Community Association for sports field |

| |improvements at Pauma Valley Community Association’s park and to purchase sports equipment. |

| |Allocate $15,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Trauma Intervention Programs of San Diego County, Inc. for the |

| |Heroes on the Scene dinner event. |

| |Allocate $64,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Full Access & Coordinated Transportation to match federal grant |

| |funds for the development of a coordinated transportation system. |

| |Allocate $8,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to North County Health Services to fund expenses for a fundraiser |

| |golf tournament. |

| |Allocate $91,958.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Friends of the Fallbrook Library for future construction |

| |costs of a new library. |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute a grant agreement with each of the organizations listed above to establish |

| |terms for receipt of the funds as described above. |

| |Find that these grant awards have a public purpose. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|29. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATIONS OF DISTRICT TWO COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDS (DISTRICT: 2) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Several communities in East County have demonstrated a need for improvements to their recreational facilities, and have shown |

| |that they are prepared to work together with other jurisdictions and community members to provide their children with |

| |opportunities to play and stay healthy. This action will provide funds to several communities to improve and develop |

| |recreational facilities in East County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The fiscal impact of these recommendations is $1,669,453. The funding source is FY 05-06 District Two Community Projects and |

| |Lakeside PLDO funds. This action will result in the addition of no new staff years and no future costs. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR JACOB: |

| |Find that the allocations to Pacific Southwest Railway Museum and Alpine Community Center and the La Mesa-Spring Valley School|

| |District are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301. |

| |Transfer appropriations of $200,000 from the District Two Community Projects fund to the Department of Parks and Recreation, |

| |Org. 52811, Account 53666, to go toward the costs for the installation of an all-weather track at El Capitan High School. |

| |Establish appropriations of $100,000 in the Lakeside Park Land Dedication Ordinance (PLDO) fund, Operating Transfer Out, for |

| |the El Capitan High School Sports Field Improvements project, based on Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Fund Balance available. |

| |Establish appropriations of $100,000 in the Department of Parks and Recreation (Org. 52811, Account 53666), for the El Capitan|

| |High School Sports Field Improvements project, based on an Operating Transfer from the Lakeside PLDO fund. |

| |Authorize the CAO, or a designee, to negotiate and execute an amendment to the existing Joint Exercise of Powers |

| |Agreement between the County of San Diego and the Grossmont Union High School District to construct an all-weather track at El|

| |Capitan High School, including any additional amendments that do not increase the County's cost.  |

| | |

| |Transfer $83,000 from Community Projects Budget (Org 15650) to the Department of Parks and Recreation (Org. 52811, Account |

| |52370) for a portion of the costs for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to construct a bridge over the Sweetwater River east |

| |of the Sweetwater Reservoir. |

| |Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer, or a designee, to negotiate, execute, and manage an agreement between the County |

| |of San Diego and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the County’s contribution toward the total cost for the U.S. Fish and |

| |Wildlife Service to construct the bridge described in Recommendation 6, including any amendments to the agreement that do not |

| |increase the County’s cost. |

| |Allocate $34,120 from the District Two Community Projects fund to Mountain Health and Community Services to purchase materials|

| |needed to install a well at Mountain Empire Little League in Campo. |

| |Allocate $41,338.39 from the District Two Community Projects fund to Ramona Pony Baseball to purchase two batting cages and a |

| |play structure for Wellfield Park in Ramona. |

| |Allocate $18,000 from the District Two Community Projects fund to the Ramona Parks & Recreation Association to purchase |

| |replacement fencing for the adult softball facility within Wellfield Park. |

| |Allocate $100,000 from the District Two Community Projects fund to El Cajon Girls Softball to be used to partner with the San |

| |Diego Padres to purchase materials to complete a Little Padres Park at Magnolia Elementary School in El Cajon. |

| |Transfer appropriations of $300,000 from the District Two Community Projects budget to Contributions to Capital Outlay Fund |

| |(Operating Transfer Out) for acquisition of land for soccer fields in Lakeside. |

| |Establish appropriations of $300,000 in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project 1009548, Lakeside Soccer Fields |

| |Acquisition, based on an Operating Transfer from the General Fund. |

| |Transfer appropriations of $650,333.11 from District Two Contributions to Community Projects to Contributions to Capital |

| |Outlay Fund, Operating Transfer Out, to provide funds for the Lakeside Sports Park project. |

| |Establish appropriations of $650,333.11 in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project 1005334, Lakeside Sports Park, based on|

| |an Operating Transfer from the General Fund. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the District Two Community Projects Fund to San Diego East County Chamber of Commerce to be used for a |

| |half-day disaster planning workshop for businesses in East County. |

| |Allocate $3,950 from the District Two Community Projects fund to the Poway Historical and Memorial Society to be used to |

| |purchase new display cases that will be used to showcase the museum’s extensive collection of artifacts, photos and documents |

| |that focus on early pioneer/farm life in Poway. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the District Two Community Projects fund to the City of Poway for improvements to the Kumeyaay-Ipai |

| |Interpretive Center. |

| |Allocate $40,000 from the District Two Community Projects fund to the Pacific Southwest Railway Museum to construct public |

| |restrooms at the museum. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the District Two Community Projects fund to the Volcan Mountain Preserve Foundation to continue the work|

| |of the Foundation so that Volcan Mountain is preserved for generations to come. |

| |Allocate $24,240 from the District Two Community Projects fund to the Grossmont Union High School District to purchase an |

| |aquatic specific scoreboard for Valhalla High School in El Cajon. |

| |Allocate $19,971.50 from the District Two Community Projects fund to Fletcher Hills Little League to purchase irrigation |

| |equipment and sod for two fields at Northmont Elementary School in La Mesa. |

| |Allocate $17,500 from the District Two Community Projects fund to the Alpine Community Center to purchase new shade structures|

| |for the park, planter boxes, stage backing and bleachers for the ball fields. |

| |Allocate $7,000 from the District Two Community Projects fund to the La Mesa-Spring Valley School District for an Eagle Scout |

| |project to provide sod and irrigation at Avondale Elementary School in Spring Valley. |

| |Find that these grant awards have a public purpose. |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with these organizations establishing terms for receipt of |

| |the funds described above. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|30. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 4) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County’s fiscal condition has enabled it to reinvest taxpayer money in our communities for the benefit of the public. |

| |The recommended action proposes that these projects of great benefit to San Diego County be funded using Community Projects |

| |Funds. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The total combined cost of the proposed recommendations is $592,082.88. Appropriations are available in the Community |

| |Projects Budget unit (0264). This action will result in the addition of no staff years and no future costs. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |VICE CHAIRMAN ROBERTS: |

| |Find that the allocations to the Rolando Little League, High Tech High Foundation, Boys and Girls Club of Greater San Diego, |

| |Veterans Village of San Diego, Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego, Family Health Centers Twin Hills Little League and |

| |University Heights Community Association are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA |

| |Guidelines section 15301. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the Rolando Little League for a new scoreboard and batting|

| |cages. |

| |Allocate $15,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to High Tech High Foundation for construction costs |

| |associated with a new High Tech High Pavilion. |

| |Allocate $70,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater San Diego for |

| |remodeling of the Encanto Branch. |

| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to Sun Yet Sen Chinese School for program needs. |

| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to Veterans Village of San Diego for landscaping and |

| |irrigation installation at its facility on Pacific Highway in San Diego. |

| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the Children’s Museum San Diego for the expansion of the |

| |museum. |

| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the San Diego World Trade Center for program needs. |

| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego for remodeling |

| |the museum on Kettner Blvd. |

| |Allocate $45,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the Kearny Mesa Little League for a new snack stand |

| |subject to the Little League raising matching funds in the amount of $45,000. |

| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to Mama’s Kitchen to purchase an industrial microwave oven, |

| |manual/automatic slicer, computer software, and expanding the refrigerator. |

| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to Family Health Centers for the expansion of the Logan |

| |Heights facility. |

| |Allocate $15,803.88 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the City Heights Town Council to purchase computer |

| |hardware and software, portable sound equipment, banners, neighborhood signs, plants and trees, and bike helmets. |

| | |

| |Allocate $6,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the Mira Mesa Town Council to purchase street banners to |

| |advertise community events and promote quality of life. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the Diamond Business Improvement District to purchase |

| |computers, printers, and a new phone system. |

| |Allocate $30,279 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the Twin Hills Little League to renovate the Little |

| |League’s T-ball field. |

| |Allocate $20,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the Downtown Partnership to purchase a trash truck. |

| |Allocate $20,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the San Diego Chinese Historical Museum for program needs |

| |and printing costs for its newsletter and other publications. |

| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to the Camp Pendleton Armed Services YMCA for program costs |

| |for the School of Infantry Recreation Center. |

| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects budget unit (0264) to Monarch School for program needs. |

| |Reallocate $5,000 in Community Projects budget unit (0264) from the Kyoto Laureate Symposium to University of San Diego |

| |Foundation to provide funding for the 2006 Kyoto Laureate Symposium event. |

| |Rescind the January 31, 2006 allocation of $15,000.00 from Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to People for Trees, and |

| |reallocate this $15,000 to the University Heights Community Association to replace the protective barrier and make other |

| |related improvements to the Vermont Street Bridge. |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute a grant agreement with the organizations listed above establishing the terms|

| |for receipt of the funds described above. |

| |Find that the grants described above have a public purpose. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|31. |SUBJECT: |CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |Daniel Clifford v. County of San Diego; SDO 0252294, SDO 0252295 |

| |B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |San Diego County Deputy Sheriffs Association, et al. v. County of San Diego, et al.; Court of Appeal No. D046774 |

| |C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |C. April Boling v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Association, et al.; San Diego County Superior Court No. GIC 859953 |

| |D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency v. Christopher A.; Fourth District Court of Appeal No. D047022 |

| |E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Potential Cases – |

| |1) |

| |F. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS |

| |(Government Code section 54957.6) |

| |Designated Representatives: Carlos Arauz, Susan Brazeau, Lynette Mercado, and Lyn Bell Employee Organizations: All |

| |ACTION: |

| |Any reportable matters will be announced on Wednesday, June 20, 2006, prior to the |

| |Board of Supervisors meeting. |

| |

|32. |SUBJECT: |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Vice-Chairman Roberts presented a proclamation declaring today Jewish Federation of San Diego County throughout the County of San|

| |Diego. |

| |Vice-Chairman Roberts presented a proclamation designating Jeremiha Douglas as Volunteer of the Month throughout the County of |

| |San Diego. |

| |Supervisor Cox and Supervisor Jacob presented a proclamation declaring today Otay Water District Day throughout the County of San|

| |Diego. |

| |Supervisor Slater-Price presented a proclamation declaring today Zandra Rhodes Day throughout the County of San Diego. |

The Board recessed at 10:54 a.m. in memory of Richard G. Blum, Elvin C. Ogle and John Ibe, resuming at 2:00 p.m. for Budget deliberations.

There being no further business, the Board adjourned at 2:15 p.m.

THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

County of San Diego, State of California

Consent: Kellogg

Discussion: Andoh

NOTE: This Statement of Proceedings sets forth all actions taken by the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up.

-----------------------

REVISION: 1

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download