Weebly



Annotated BibliographyPrimary Sources"Alternatives to Animal Testing." John Hopkins. Bloomberg School of Public Health, n.d. Web. < > This website has information from a college study on alternatives to animal testing. It is a reliable source because it is made by John Hopkins a college. This is a study where they are looking for an alternative way to get the result of animal testing without actually harming the animals or being cruel. "Alternatives to Animal Testing." PETA. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. This source was used to provide many quotes and evidence of the alternatives to animal testing from many professionals and organizations. It also contained a video that was used in the website made about organ on chips. This website detailed why alternatives to animal testing were necessary."Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing." Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, n.d. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. This primary source outlines the studies of alternatives to animal testing done at John Hopkins University. It contains articles and studies done directly at the university and their results. This website helped provide information about the different types of options available instead of animal testing."Organs-on-Chips." Wyss Institute at Harvard. Wyss Institute, n.d. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. This website was made by the Wyss Institute at Harvard University, it talks about the studies made by many professionals. It goes into detail about the Organ on chips and provides a video as well as picture that was used in the capstone website made.Secondary Sources"About Animal Testing : Humane Society International." RSS. Humane Society International, n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. <;. This source is made by the Humane Society which is against animal testing. It lists what animal testing is, what animals are used, what’s wrong with animal testing, what’s the alternative to animal testing, why is animal testing unreliable, and if animal testing is really needed. The website details each of these topics and gives evidence why animal testing is not necessary and should be gotten rid of. "Alternatives to Animals - Ethics of Medical Research with Animals." Ethics of Medical Research with Animals. The Hastings Center, n.d. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. This website lists out the different alternatives to animal testing and gives a brief description of each. Some examples of alternatives include computer modeling, in vitro tests, microfluidic chip tests, and micro dosing. The website also lists each types advantages and drawbacks that they have currently. "Alternatives to Animal Testing, Alternatives to Animal Research, Alternatives to Vivisection, Alternatives to Use of Animals in Research, Alternatives to Dissection, Animal Testing, Experimentation." GEARI Group for the Education of Animal Rights Issues. GEARI, n.d. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. GEARI group’s website outlines the different options other than animal testing that will yield the same results. It shows the different types of alternatives as well as has a link to the John Hopkins animal testing alternatives website."Alternatives to Animal Testing." Alternatives to Animal Testing. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, n.d. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences wrote about the alternatives to animal testing and its benefits to the society. It also goes over reducing, refining and replacing animal testing."Animal Testing 101." PETA. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. <;. This is a source made from an organization against the spread and use of animals for testing purposes. This source is definitely biased against vivisection. It outlines how animals are being cruelly treating animals for testing purposes. The source shows a propaganda video of animals being cruelly treated without any rights. The website gives many reasons and statistics why animal testing should be stopped,"BENEFITS." Pro-Test: Standing up for Science. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. <;. This source shows an opposing viewpoint then the previous sources. It outlines the pros of animal testing and why it should be continued. With the evidence from the previous sources the argument against animal testing is stronger than the evidence provided in this source. This website states that animal testing has led to important advancements in human history. They also claim that animal testing benefits more than humans and have led to important vaccinations necessary to human survival."Cosmetic Testing Is Now BANNED In New Zealand!" True Activist. N.p., 08 Apr. 2015. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. This website provided a picture that provokes visualization in the readers mind about animal testing. This image was used under the thesis in the website. It shows a bunny with makeup on and a lady with the same makeup on staring at each other."Cosmetics Tests That Use Animals." RSS. N.p., Mar.-Apr. 2014. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. < >. This source is a website that shows many types of animal testing. The specifics are for animal testing with cosmetics. The website lists the type of test, type of animal used, what the animal endures, and the purpose of the test. The source does not show a lot of bias against animal testing, it just shows what suffering animals have to endure for us to get a new safe product.Desmon, Stephanie. "'Mini-brains' Developed at Johns Hopkins Could Reshape Brain Research, Drug Testing." The Hub. N.p., 12 Feb. 2016. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. This source provided an illustration of the mini brain alternative test, as well as a video explaining the test and studies of the mini brain done by John Hopkins University. The mini brains are supposed to simulate the brain and how it reacts to new products."Do “Alternatives” Exist?" Speaking of Research. N.p., 20 Mar. 2008. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. This source goes into detail the types of alternates to animal testing as well as the importance of each type. It talks about micro dosing, computer modeling, MRI scanning and in-vitro testing."Good Animal Welfare Holds the Key to Cures." European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. Efpia, n.d. Web. May-June 2016. <;. This source provides evidence towards counter claim and picture that supports counterclaim. It provides a different viewpoint towards animal testing and why it is necessary to progress in the medical and cosmetic industry.Hajar, Rachel. "Animal Testing and Medicine." Heart Views : The Official Journal of the Gulf Heart Association. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd, n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. <;. This source is a website. This website is a good source because it is a government website. It shows the history of animal testing and many professionals in the field of animal testing and they’re views. The website also shows the different types of animal testing throughout time. This source also shows different types of drugs and cosmetics tested on animals. This website doesn’t show direct, obvious bias against or towards animal testing, it is simply giving statistics and information about animal testing throughout history."Harm and Suffering | Animal Use in Research." Harm and Suffering | Animal Use in Research. New England Anti-Vivisection Society, n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. <;. This website is made by the New England Anti-Vivisection Society. This website shows evidence against animal testing. It illustrates how animal testing is cruel and bad. This source shows bias because the group is against vivisection, which is animal testing. Using this information and evidence people that look at this source can draw the conclusion that animal testing is bad and should be stopped.Murnaghan, Ian. "Background and History of Animal Testing." Background and History of Animal Testing. N.p., 20 Jan. 2016. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. <;. This source shows the history of animal testing from its beginning. It first gives a background on what animal testing is, then how the public is against animal testing researchers, lastly this source talks about the future of animal testing. This website goes in depth about individual groups who criticized by the researchers for going into animal testing. It shows how animal testing has increased and changed over time."Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing." Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing. Lone Star College, n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. < ;. This website was made by Lone Star College, it talks about how animal testing is cruel and why it should be stopped. It shows the tests that harm the animals and how they are not needed. It also talks about how there are no rights for the animals that are getting tested on. This means that there is basically no limitations on what you can use the animal for in the research and testing."Testing - American Anti-Vivisection Society." American AntiVivisection Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. <;. This source is another group against the testing of animals and the cruelty that comes along with it. It gives a list of the test run on animals and a brief description of what it is and how it affects the animals negatively. Another thing this source mentions is statistics of public surveys showing how the public views animal testing.The Case for and against Animal Testing. The Onion, May-June 2014. Web. May-June 2016. <;. This source provided visualization in the form of and illustration used in the capstone website. It shows the pros and cons of animal testing. The image show a scientist observing a mouse in a glass test container."Why Animals Are Used." Read the Four Main Reasons Why Animals Are Used in Medical Research. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 May 2016. <;. This Website shows the reasons why animal testing is necessary and how it contributes to the scientific breakthroughs throughout history. It provides in depth explanation on the four reasons that animal testing is good, for safety of people, to develop cures and treatments, to study diseases and to advance in the science field. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download