WordPress.com



SYNTAX and NOAM CHOMSKYThe generative/transformational or Chomskyan school of grammar is not just one among many. It has revolutionized the scientific study of language. Chomsky is a linguist, not a traditional grammarian. As such he approaches language with the intention above all of developing a theory from his observations. In addition that theory is intended to have the widest possible power of explanation of linguistic phenomena. Chomsky's point of departure is his observation that fluent speakers of a language possess the ability: to produce sentences that they have never heard before [as they speak children will produce utterances that they have never heard nor produced before themselves]to understand sentences that they have never heard before. ??????????? Chomsky calls this ability to utter sentences not heard before nor said before the competence of the native/fluent speaker. The actual production of sentences by a person he calls her/his performance. The distinction between competence and performance is an important one in the Chomskyan system. Competence is lodged in the human psyche and it exists prior to and independently of performance.He also observes that native/fluent speakers can purely by intuition decide that certain sentences are well-formed/ grammatical and that others are ill-formed/ ungrammatical. This reality of the intuitive judgement of the native/ fluent speaker lies at the very heart of the Chomskyan analysis of the sentence. ?????????Definitions of GrammarSince sentence formation is the most obvious and frequent manifestation of creativity in any language, the syntactic rules of a language are often referred to as the grammar of the language.? But morphology and phonology are also part of the grammar in that they, too, are creative tools.? Here it might be pertinent to mention a few other definitions of the term grammar that are widely used.a) A descriptive grammar is a description of the structure of a language in all its aspects--morphology, syntax, phonology--which attempts do portray the language as accurately as possible in terms of how it is naturally used by speakers.b) A prescriptive grammar is a description of a language which assigns value judgments to competing ways native speakers use in forming words or sentences.? Prescriptive grammars do not attempt to describe the language as it is naturally spoken, but rather to tell the speakers how they best should speak it.c) A third type, grammars of foreign languages written for second language learners fall in between the other two types.? They represent attempts to describe a language as it is spoken by natives in order to tell non-natives how to speak it.Generative Grammar (sentences can be generated infinitely)The kind-hearted boy had many girlfriends.The kindhearted, intelligent boy had many girlfriends.The kindhearted, intelligent, handsome boy had many girlfriends.How could you continue creating sentences of this genre?By adding adjectives (modification).John went to the movies.John went to the movies and ate popcorn.John went to the movies, ate popcorn, and drank a coke.How could you continue creating sentences of this genre?By adding a noun connected by and (coordination).The cat chased the mouse.The cat chased the mouse that ate the cheese.The cat chased the mouse that ate the cheese that came from the cow.The cat chased the mouse that ate the cheese that came from the cow that grazed in the field.How could you continue creating sentences of this genre?By adding a relative clause (clause insertion).Sentence formation can go on forever using mechanisms like those seen above (modification, coordination, clause insertion) and therefore the number of sentences that are possible are limitless. However, all of these sentences are composed of discrete units that are all combined by rules. Why do these rules exist? Well, so that our finitely spaced brain can easily store these infinite combinations (of discrete units and rules).Syntax: the rules of sentence formation. Also, syntax represents the component of the mental grammar that represents speakers’ knowledge of the structure of phrases and sentences.Grammatical or *Ungrammatical?Grammatical (well-formed): Describes a well-formed sequence of words, one conforming to the rules of syntax.*Ungrammatical (ill formed): Ill-formed structures (sequence of words) that do not conform to the rules of grammar/syntax. A native/fluent speaker will judge intuitively that a sentence to be grammatical and the other one to be ungrammatical *.Intuitive knowledge belongs to the linguistic competence of the native/fluent speaker.In generative/transformational grammar there are three important aspects of sentence structure:1) the linear order of words from left to right 2) the categorization of words into parts of speech3) the groupings of wordsGrammaticality is not based on:1) Grammaticality does not depend on having heard the sentence before.Example: Enormous crickets in pink socks danced at the prom.2) Grammaticality does not depend on whether the sentence is meaningful or not.Example: Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.Although the sentence does not make sense, it is syntactically well formed. However, it sounds “funny”.Compare: Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. (sounds funny)*Furiously sleep ideas green colorless. (ungrammatical)3) Grammaticality does not depend on the truth of the sentence.Example: Pregnant men are happy.Unicorns live in the forest.Linguists try and show how syntactic rules account for our knowledge of language. Therefore a theory of grammar (developed by linguists) must provide a complete characterization of what speakers implicitly know about their language.Now... here is the discussion that will lead to PHRASE STRUCTURE TREESSyntax:Hierarchical Structure: the groupings and subgroupings of the parts of a sentence into syntactic categories.Example: the bird sang [[the][bird][sang]]We already saw these groupings and subgroupings with morphemes:Example: unlockable [[un][lock][able]]Ambiguity: will happen when a sentence has multiple meanings (as we saw with the word unlockable).For sale: an antique desk suitable for ladies with thick legs and larger drawers.We will oil your sewing machine and adjust tension in your home for $25.These structures are ambiguous because of the grouping, therefore causing structural ambiguity.One approach to analyzing a sentence is to divide the words of a sentence into phrases (defined as words closely associated with one another syntactically).? This technique is known as parsing.? The most fundamental division is between subject and predicate (verb). Sometimes a sentence or phrase allows for two different syntactic interpretations. Parsing using parentheses to show syntactic relations can disambiguate such a phrase as: old men and womenOther sentences do not lend themselves to such a linear approach.? Sometimes the words that belong to the same syntactic unit are separated by other words (embedded sentences): The book that was lying under all the other books is the most interesting.The book (that was lying under all the other books) is the most interesting.(Here we have an embedded relative/adjective clause.)Tree diagrams can be used to show such "long distance" grammatical relations.Consider also the sentence:The fish is too old to eat.Here, parsing and even tree diagramming cannot separate out the two potential meanings.? In such cases of semantic ambiguity, paraphrases can be used to express two meanings hidden in a single linear form:The fish is too old for the fish to eat.? The fish is too old to be eaten.Tree Diagrams: Hierarchical structures are generally depicted in a tree diagram. Tree diagrams make it easier to see the parts and subparts of a sentence.Example: The child found the puppy.How would you group the words in this sentence?(the child) (found the puppy)(the child) ((found) (the puppy)) it’s easier to visualize this with a tree((the)(child)) ((found) ((the) (puppy)))The child found the puppythe child found the puppythe child found the puppythe puppyConstituents: refer to the natural groupings of a sentence. It is a syntactic unit in a phrase structure tree.Example: The child found the puppy.The child = noun phrase (NP)found the puppy = verb phrase (VP)Here is a summary of the different types of CONSTITUENTS:Noun Phrase (NP): may function as the subject or as an object in a sentence. They often contain some form of a noun or proper noun, but may consist of a pronoun alone, or even contain a clause or a sentence.See page 127 #1: identify the NPs.(2) Verb Phrase (VP): it always contains a verb and may contain other categories (NPs, PPs) etc. see p. 127 #2: identify the VPs(3) Sentence (S): contains an NP, AUX, and an VPOR Inflectional Phrase (IP): contains NP, INFL, VP (This is for Spanish and French)(4) Adjective Phrase (AdjP): (5) Preposition Phrase (PP):(6) Complementizer Phrase (CP): An embedded clause or subordinate clauseThese larger syntactic categories (NP, VP, PP, etc) are called NODES. Nodes, contain the following information (parts of speech):(7) Determiner (Det): is found in a NP(8) Adjective (Adj): is found in an AdjP(9) Noun (N): is found in a NP(10) Preposition (P): is found in a PP(11) Adverb (Adv)(12) Auxiliary Verb (Aux) will, has, is, may, might, would, could, can, etc.OR Inflection (Infl) this holds the inflectional information (tense, mood, gender, number) of RICH inflectional languages (Spanish, Italian, French-somewhat)p. 128 PHRASE STRUCTURE TREESnodes, immediately dominate, dominatePhrase structure trees represent:1) the linear order of the words in the sentence2) the groupings of words into syntactic categories3) the hierarchical structure of the syntactic categoriesNOTE: What we will see in this class is historical in the sense that it is NO LONGER USED. What is now used is X’-theory (Government and Binding). What we will see here forms the basis for X’-theory.Some Phrase Structure Rules Sets of rules like the these make up phrase structure grammar.S → NP Aux VPAux = will hold helping verbsAnd inflection informationS→S conjSconj = conjunction (and, or)NP → (Det) (Adj) (AdjP) N (PP)Pro Pro = Pronoun (We, it, los, se, )NP conj NP CPVP → V (NP) (PP) (CP) (Adv)Cop PNom (PP) (CP) Cop = copula, helping verb (links N V CPin first NP to the N in the NP under VP) (is)PNom=Predicate Nominal (I am a student, I am happy)CP → COMP S COMP= Complementizer (that, etc.)PP → P NPPNom → NPAdjPAdjP* → (Deg) Adj (PP) (NP)Deg=adverbial degree (very)CPDet → Art Art= Article (the)Poss Poss = Possessive (my)Dem Dem = Demonstrative (that, these)*Note: In the text AdjP is referred to as AP.( ) = denotes OPTIONAL informationNodes specifically contain:HEADS and COMPLEMENTS[[The child]NP [[put]V [the puppy]NP [in the garden.]PP]VP]SDRAW!V (put) is the head of VPAll the other constituents in the VP are the complements (NP, PP, etc).NPs are headed by _______?PPs are headed by _______?AdjPs are headed by _______?SELECTIONExample: [[The boy]NP [[found]V [the ball]NP]VP]S.*The boy found quickly.*The boy found in the house.What can we say about the verb found? What does it need?Example: [[Sam]NP [[put]V [the milk]NP [in the refrigerator]PP]VP]S*Sam put the milk.*Sam put in the refrigerator.What can we say about the verb put? What does it need?Transitive Verb: is a verb that requires a Noun Phrase direct object complement. This additional information is called “selection”.Example: [[Michael]NP [slept]VP]S.*Michael slept a fish.What can we say about the verb sleep? What does it NOT need?Intransitive Verb: verbs that cannot take an NP complement.The table below summarizes properties that can be said to characterize languages which are consistently head-final or consistently head-initial.Head-final (JAPANESE)verb occurs last, followingsubject, object, adpositionalphrases, adjuncts, adverbspostpositionsnoun occurs last in nounphrase modifiers in general precedethe modified element (English)Head-initial (ENGLISH, SPANISH, FRENCH)verb precedes object,adpositional phrases,adjuncts, adverbs, thoughnot necessarily the subject (Spanish, English, French)prepositions (Spanish, English, French)noun occurs first in nounphrase modifiers in general followthe modified element (Spanish, French)English, French and Spanish are predominantly head-initial. It has SVO word order in basic, declarative sentences. The head of a verb phrase, e.g. won, precedes the object NP the race. The head P of a prepositional phrase precedes the object NP: of (P) Queen Elizabeth (NP). The head N of a noun phrase precedes the possessive NP: the daughter (NP)of Queen Elizabeth (possessive NP). The head N of a noun phrase precedes the relative clause: the daughter(NP), who was born to Queen Elizabeth (relative clause); and so forth. As a warning, things are not totally consistent in English (and in many languages for that matter). English has some head-final patterns. To give you one example, English has both the head-initial of-possessive I have been giving as an example and a head-final possessive, i.e. the possessive s genitive. In the possessive s genitive, the head NP follows the rest of the phrase: Queen Elizabeth's (possessive s NP) daughter(head). First and foremost, however, keep in mind that speakers of head-final languages are more likely to make word order errors in English than speakers of head-initial languages. Grammatical Terms with SPANISH/FRENCH examples.TermAbbreviationFrench ExampleSpanish ExampleSentenceSJ’apprends le franais.Aprendo espa?ol.Noun PhraseNPJe cherche un livre.Busco un libro.Verb PhraseVPElle viendra demain.Ella vendrá ma?ana.Prepositional PhrasePPTue s avec lui??Estás con él?Adjective PhraseAdjPIl est très content.Está muy contento.Predicate NominalPNomJe suis ètudiante.Soy estudiante.PronounProNous te regardons.Nosotros te miramos.DeterminerDetParticles that modify a noun – articles, possessives, demonstrativesArticleArtLa salle est vide.La sala está vacía.PossessivePossMon ami est ici.Mi amigo está aquí.DemonstrativeDemCe garon parle.Ese ni?o plementizerIntroduces subordinate or embedded clauseCompJe pense que tu as tort.Creo que estás equivocado.CopulaConnects the subject with a certain attributeCopIl est triste.Es/está triste.Ser, estar, quedar, parecerDegreeDegIl est très triste.Es/está muy triste.NegationNegJe n’aime pas les fleursNo me gusta correr.Draw trees for the following ENGLISH sentences:1) The man fled from the police.2) The baby slept happily.3) A girl laughed at the clown.4) The boat sailed up the river.5) The boys are happy children. (copular)5) The boy saw the man with the telescope. (ambiguous)6) Pretty girls and happy ladies whispered softly. (coordinated)7) The tall girls are happy and the noisy boys are tired. (cop & coordinated)8) The teacher believes that the student knows the answer. (subordinate)9) The teacher that teaches small children ate lunch with her mom. (embedded)PP. 166-167 3, 4, 7 – more practice with ENGLISH sentences SPANISH:Tu hermano vino por la autopista.Nosotros vivimos en la tercera casa a la derecha.Los jugadores de fútbol son personas importantes en el mundo del deporte. (copular)Pablo habló a los estudiantes de lingüística. (ambiguous)Marta y yo salimos a las cuatro. (coordinated)Las chicas son contentas y los chicos están cansados. (cop & coordinated)Yo sé que ustedes compraron la casa. (subordinate)La universidad mexicana que ofrece clases de espa?ol tiene cuatro profesores de Oaxaca. (embedded)FRENCH:Elle arrive de la gare.Nous habitons à la troisième maison sur la droite.Les joueurs de football sont des gens importants dans le monde du sport. (cop)Paul a parlé aux étudiants de linguistique. (ambiguous)Ma petit amie et moi parlons bien l’anglais. (coordinated)(cop & coordinated)Je sais que vous voulez acheter la maison. (subordinate)Les fleurs qu’ils ont apportées sont très jolies. (embedded)Sentence Relatedness: sentences may be related in various ways:a)Sentences may have the same phrase structure but differ in meaning because they contain different words b) they may have different meanings but contain the same words in the same order and only differ in structure (ambiguous sentences)c) they may differ in structure (w/small differences in grammatical morphemes) but with no difference in meaningThe father wept silently. vs. The father silently wept.Mary hired Bill. vs. Bill was hired by Mary.d) they may have structural differences that correspond systematically to meaning differencesThe boy is sleeping. Is the boy sleeping?The boy will sleep. Will the boy sleep?The above sentences in c) and d) are not accounted for by the phrase structure rules presented.This leads to our discussion aboutTRANSFORMATION RULES TRANSFORMATIONAL RULES (a.k.a. T-Rules)Noam Chomsky noticed that languages contain systematic ways of paraphrasing sentences:? a) Active sentences can regularly be turned into passives: The boy kicked the ball.--> the ball was kicked by the boy. (passive transformation) b) Statements can be regularly turned into questions: He is there?? Is he there?? (interrogative transformation)? He came to believe that such parallel syntactic means of expressing the same meaning were simply surface manifestations of deeper structural units of language.To study and describe such deep structures, he devised the theory of transformational grammar.? The three main tenets of this theory are:1) The surface forms of a language are reducible to a limited number of deep structures.? The same deep structure is manifested in several different ways in actual sentences.? This is similar to the use of the principle of allomorphs to describe morpheme variants.2) These deep structures are universal--in other words, the same for all languages of the world; only the rules for deriving the surface forms from the deep structures differ from language to language.3) The reason these deep structures are universal is that they are inborn, part of the human genetic code; being inborn they help children discover the surface forms of language so quickly.These Transformational Rules are syntactic rules that apply to an underlying phrase structure tree (deep structure) of a sentence and derive a new structure (surface structure) by moving or inserting elements into the tree.For example, in ENGLISH, a way to capture the relationship between a declarative and a question is to allow the phrase structure rules to generate the structure corresponding to the declarative sentence, and have another formal device (i.e. Transformation Rules) that move the auxiliary in front of the subject. Therefore....Transformation-rule: MOVE Aux move the first auxiliary verb following the subject NP to the left of the subject.In the declarative sentence, MOVE Aux moves the auxiliary to the front of the subject (NP) to form the question.Example:The boy is sleeping → Is the boy ____ sleeping.SNP Aux VPDet N VThe boy is sleeping.DEEP STRUCTURESAux NP VPDet N Vis the boy --- sleeping.SURFACE STRUCTUREThe T-rule of MOVE Aux related the deep structure sentenceThe boy is sleeping.to the surface structureIs the boy sleeping?So…what happened?1) The phrase structure rules generate a basic structure (deep structure).2) Aux-movement applied to produce the derived structure (surface structure).Surface structure: the structure that results from applying transformational rules to a deep structure. It is syntactically closest to the actual utterance.Deep structure: Any phrase structure tree generated by the phrase structure rules of a transformational grammar. The basic syntactic structure of the grammar.Spanish:Move-aux doesn’t exist in Spanish since you never separate auxiliary and verb: está comiendo, he habladoHowever, let’s see how a question is formed:El ni?o está durmiendo (deep) = ?Está durmiendo el ni?o? (surface) (draw)SPANISH Language specific transformation: MOVE -VPFrench:Move-aux doesn’t exist in French either since you never separate auxiliary and verb: J’ai dormi (I have slept)However, let’s see how a question is formed:John dort. (deep) = Est-ce que John dort? (surface)(draw)Le garon dort. (deep) = Est-ce que le garon dort?? (surface)(John is sleeping, John sleeps, John does sleep).FRENCH Language specific transformation: Insert – "est-ce que" infront of subject.Back to English:English has something very similar to the French Transformation Rule: Insert “est-ce que”. When forming “yes/no” questions in English, we insert “do” before the subject. In English we have the Transformation Rule: Insert “do”.The boy sleeps. = Does the boy sleep?HERE ARE OTHER SENTENCE TYPES THAT ARETRANSFORMATIONALLY RELATED:T-rule: there sentences (“dummy” pronoun filling subject position)There was a man on the roof → A man was on the roofEnglish: Doesn’t allow “empty” subjects because the information can not be gained elsewhere. Therefore, a “dummy” subject pronoun (pro) is used to make sure that spot is filled. This is also true for “it” with weather verbs (It is raining.) (Draw)French: Is similar to English in that Il y a, Voilà insertion (there is, there are). The first is used to state that a person, place, or thing exists (statement of fact). The second is used to point out the location of a person, place, or thing (exclamation or identifying of facts). In addition, il, il y a are used with weather verbs.Voilà/Il y a deux policiers dans la place. (there)Il pleut. (it’s raining)Il fait froid. (it’s cold)Il y a un orage. (There’s a storm.)Spanish: Doesn’t have the need to use “dummy” pronouns since it has RICH inflectional morphemes and the information about the subject can be gathered from the verbal inflections. So, in the PRO spot under NP, you simply use a “null” symbol ().____ Hay dos policías en la plaza. ____ Llueve.____ Hace calor. This lead to the discussion of another Spanish Transformation Rule: eliminate ProYo hablo espa?ol = ____ hablo espa?ol. This happens for the same explanation as above: Spanish has a rich verbal inflection system and that eliminated information (pro) can be recuperated from the verbal inflection.***The Transformation Rule: eliminate PRO doesn’t exist in French and English to the same extent as it exists in Spanish. Because both have weak inflectional morphology, the eliminated information (pro) can not be recuperated. HOWEVER, you can eliminate pro in French and English only when the subject is found in an embedded clause…more specifically a relative clause (not with a subordinate).The girl, that has blond hair, is nice. La fille qui a les sheveux blonds est gentille.T-rule: active-passive in a passive sentence, the direct object of atransitive verb in deep structure functions as the subject in surface structure.The cat chased the mouse → The mouse was chased by the catSpanish: Same as English.French: Same as English.T-rule: PP preposing moves any PP immediately under VP.The girl saw the boy with the telescope →With the telescope, the girl saw the boy.Spanish: Same as English.French: Same as English.T-rule: that omission allow “that” to be omitted when it precedes a sentence complement (CP) but not in subject positions.I know that you know. I know you know.That you know bothers me. *You know bothers me.Spanish: doesn’t exist with sentencesFrench: doesn’t exist SOME more Language Specific Transformation Rules that don’t have ENGLISH equivalentsFrenchne – pas INSERTION around conjugated form of aller, ne before reflexive/reciprocal pronoun and pas after verbinsert ne pas around the helping verb to form the passé compose insert ne pas around the auxiliary verb to form the negative.Yes-no questions If subject is a pronominal noun, you can move it after conjugated verb or leave it in-front of the verbif subject is NP or Pro, leave it in-front of conjugated verb and insert ‘est-ce que’ before sentenceTransposition (inversion) – not mandatory to form questions (yes/no) S – VSpanishNegation deletion and transposition (No vino nadie Nadie vino.)Insertion – personal “a”, (indirect object marker “a” is a preposition)All of the previous transformations act on structures without regard to the words that they contain because they are structure dependent.Sentences are organized according to two principles:(1) constituent structure -the hierarchical organization of the subparts of a sentence- Phrase structure rules.. (2) syntactic dependencies -the dependencies that exist among the elements in the sentence. That is, the presence of a particular word or morpheme can depend on the presence of some other word or morpheme in a sentence. For example:a) Selection (transitive vs. intransitive verbs)b) Agreement (the features in Aux and on the verb must match the features of the subject)c) Wh-questionsLet’s look at some sentences:i) What will Max eat?“eat” is a transitive verb, so where is the direct object?ii) Where has Pete put his ball?“Put” selects a direct object and a preposition phrase, so where is the PP following “his ball”?iii) Which dog do you think loves bones?“Loves” carries the third-person –s inflectional morpheme, so where is the subject to trigger this agreement?These are all gaps where the wh-phrase is assumed to be at the beginning of the sentence. The wh-phrase in: (i) acts as the D.O., (ii) acts as the PP, and (iii) acts as the subject. We have here another Transformational Rule: Move -whT-rule: move -wh wh questions are moved up to a new CP.Deep structure of What will Max eat?CPComp SNP Aux VP V NPMax will eat whatThe surface structure representation of this sentence is:CPComp SAux NP Aux VPV NPwhat will Max --- eat ---Spanish: Jorge come qué. = ?Qué come Jorge?In Spanish, in addition to the T-Rule Move –wh, there is an additional rule present: Move VPFrench:George mangera que = Qu’est ce que George mangera?In French, in addition to the T-Rule Move-wh, there is an additional rule present: Insert “qu’est ce”This insertion is similar to the English T-Rule: Insert “do”.John saw who?= Who did John see?Some Cross-linguistic syntactic variationsFrench & Spanish mark future and conditional tense on the main verb (inflectional morphology), while English requires an auxiliary verb to mark the future. The adjective follows the noun it modifies in French & Spanish, while in English an adjective precedes the noun it modifies.The adjective agrees in number with the noun in modifies in French & Spanish, while in English it does not.The definite article agrees in number with the noun in precedes in French & Spanish, while in English it does not.French and Spanish adverbs (of the type never, always, often) follow the verb, whereas in English they precede the verb.7) “se” in Spanish:indirect object “se” reflexive/reciprocal “se” passive “se” found only with transitive verbs in the 3rd person Se pintaron las paredes.impersonal “se” occurs with intranstive verbs (this will function as PRO)Se vive mejor aquí.Mixed passive or impersonal “se” (se + transitive verb + a) – verb is always singularSe llama a los perros con un silbido.6) Non-fault “se”Se me perdieron mis libros.OPTIONAL INFORMATIONTransformational grammar has maintained its popularity since 1957 when Noam Chomsky published his first book, Syntactic Structures.? But major problems continue to dog the theory.? The main problems are:1) Transformational rules only work for sentences composed of separate noun and verb phrases.? We have seen that not all sentences are of this type.2) Mainly English data was used to find these supposedly universal deep structures.? Usually one of the paraphrases is taken as the basic one and the other derived from it: cf. active and passive.? But active is not more basic in all languages; Japanese uses the passive as its more basic form.3) No deep structures have been described that would apply across all languages.? There seem to be universal tendencies in syntax, but no universal has yet been proven to exist that would be more specific than the general creativity in humans.Thus, no real progress has been made in writing a universal grammar that would be applicable to all human languages. In chemistry we have the Periodic table of Elements--all substances on earth can be seen as compounds of a finite set of elements.? Human language doesn't seem to work this way, and no such table of universal grammar elements has been found.In previous summaries we have slowly worked our way upwards from smaller to ever larger building blocks of human language. Initially, we discovered that there are meaning-distinguishing units of sound (phonemes), followed by meaning-bearing parts of words (morphemes). What, then, is the next larger unit of measurement in linguistic analysis? The following list gives an indication:1.?sentences?contain one or several2.?clauses?contain one or several3.?phrases?contain one or several4.?words?contain one or several5.?morphemesWhile some languages blur the boundaries between words and longer expressions to some extent due to their morphology, English allows a fairly clear segmentation into?phrases,?clauses?and?sentences. The structural relations of these units with one another fall into the domain of?syntax. Just like morphology, syntax is not concerned with what a sentence?means, in the sense of what it tells us about the world, but with the internal structure of units and their relations to one another. In other words, syntax asks which sentences are in accord with the grammatical rules imposed by a particular language and which aren’t.When talking about sentences as units in grammar, it is important to recognize that we idealize their status to some extent. Spoken language often consists of incomplete utterances and seemingly disjointed pieces, but this does not make it ‘less grammatical’.Two simple sentences demonstrate aptly what sort of relations are covered by syntax:John likes pie*John pie likesThe words used in both sentences are identical and common expressions in English. But clearly there is a problem with?John pie likes. While in?Persiansuch a sentence structure would be acceptable, it cannot be considered grammatically well-formed in English, because it does not conform with thecanonical word order?of English (Subject – Verb – Object, or SVO). Clearly the words themselves would also be different in Persian, but what counts in the context of syntax is that what is?grammatical?in one language may well beungrammatical?in another and that this dimension is detached from?meaningas we frequently understand it.A famous example sentence helps to exemplify this last aspect of language:Colorless green ideas sleep furiouslyThe sentence may not ‘make sense’ in that ideas cannot be colorless, do not have the ability to sleep and are not able to do so furiously. But grammatically the sentence is perfectly acceptable, because every word is in a place where it can potentially be, something that is not the case with?*John pie likes?or *Furiously sleep ideas green colorless.Two central questions from the vantage point of syntax are therefore ‘What are the building blocks of a sentence?’ and?‘How do they interact with one another in a particular language?’ConstituencyThose elements in a sentence that form structural units are calledconstituents. From a functional perspective (in other words, when asking what the constituents in a sentence?do), it is possible to distinguish between two basic building blocks that exist in any complete sentence: a?referring expressionand a?predication.referring expressionpredicationMaryate an appleIdon’t like MondaysThe carcrashed into the wall with a bangItrained steadily all day longThe referring expression is essentially something (a person, thing, emotion, state or abstract concept) that we make a statement about (for example, that it went somewhere, did something, has a certain quality and so forth).PhrasesIf we turn from function to grammar we can make another observation: the referring expression is always a?noun phrase?(NP), while the predication is averb phrase?(VP). A complete English sentence will always contain these components.NPVPMikelikes pizzaMany peopledecided not to voteThese two examples demonstrate why we use the terms noun?phrase?and verbphrase, instead of just speaking of nouns and verbs:?Mike?and?Many people?fill the same syntactic slot, while?likes pizza?and?decided not to vote?fill another (they are constituents). Phrases can vary a great deal in terms of length and complexity and they can themselves contain other phrases. For example, the verb phrase?likes pizza?contains the noun phrase?pizza.Constituency testsIt is possible to test whether part of a sentence is a constituent via several relatively simple tests. Three of the most common tests are?substitution,movement?and?question-forming.When the fire broke out,?the girl on the roof?cried for helpIn the example above, replacing the noun phrase?the girl on the roof?with the pronoun?she?yields a grammatical sentence.When the fire broke out,?she?cried for helpIf we replaced only?the girl?with?she, the result would not be a grammatical sentence:?*When the fire broke out, she on the roof cried for help.?The fact that we can substitute a pronoun for?the girl on the roof?proves its status as a constituent of the sentence.Another possibility is to move the assumed constituent to the front of the sentence:When the fire broke out,?the girl on the roof?cried for helpThe girl on the roof?cried for help when the fire broke outMoving only parts of the noun phrase would not result in a well-formed sentence because it would destroy its structural integrity (*The girl when the fire broke out on the roof cried for help).Forming questions that ask specifically for the constituent is another approach:Q:?Who?cried for help when the fire broke out?A:?The girl on the roofHeadednessThe element that gives a phrase its name (a noun phrase, verb phrase, prepositional phrase) is commonly called the?head. To give an example, in a noun phrase the head noun may be preceded by a determiner, adjective or another noun (e.g.?the crowded football field) and followed by a prepositional phrase or relative clause (the book on the table;?the girl who called the police). If we replace a noun phrase with with something else, it must be another noun or a pronoun – all other words in the noun phrase are optional.All sorts of people?love pizzaSue?loves pizzaI?love pizza*The loves pizza*Green loves pizza*But loves pizzaWhile this kind of?endocentric headedness?generally applies to noun phrases and verb phrases, prepositional phrases frequently behave in a different way. For example, the prepositional phrase in?The keys are?on the table?cannot be replaced with only?on?or?the table?–?*The keys are on?and?*The keys are the table?are both ungrammatical.If we examine the constituency of sentences (in other words, their?phrase structure) we find that frequently units are grammatically ‘packaged’ inside other units, producing a hierarchical structure. One way of expressing said structure is by using brackets (note that in the example?S?stands for?sentence, not subject):The old man’s cat slept= (S (NP (NP?The old man ’s)?cat) (VP?slept) )Another, very popular method of expressing a phrase structure is the use of tree diagrams, as in the example belowOne good approach when looking at the phrase structure of a sentence is to identify the main clause’s noun phrase and verb phrase and then break down the sentence into smaller units, one constituent at a time.Verb argumentsTwo terms related to grammar that you have probably already encountered in school are?subject?and?object. While the constituents of a sentence are its components, subject and object are specific?syntactic roles?that define the relationship of constituents to the verb (in other words, they are the verb’sarguments). In the example above,?John lost his pants,?John?is a noun phrase that fills the role of subject in relation to?lost?which is the main verb of the sentence, while?his pants?is the direct object. We use the term?transitivity?to describe what arguments a particular verb assigns.TransitivityVerbs assign specific argument slots to constituents according to the predication they express.SueyawnedSV?SuelikescookiesSVO(d)?SuegaveJohna beerSVO(i)O(d)In the first example, the verb?yawn?is?intransitive?– it does not permit an object (*Sue yawned John?is not grammatical). By contrast, a direct object is required in the second sentence (*Sue likes?does not work), making the verb?likemonotransitive. Finally, the third sentence has a so-called double object construction. The subject is followed by two objects, the indirect one inserted before the direct one. Because of this, we refer to?give?as a?ditransitive?verb. Note that many verbs permit multiple argument configurations:?John bought a beer?(montransitive) and?John bought Sue a beer?(ditransitive) both work.Two additional syntactic roles, which are in turn associated with subjects and objects, are those of?complement?and?plementsComplements are associated with either subjects (subject complements) or objects (object complements). They provide more information about the thing they are associated with (they?predicate?the subject or object) and are often required in order for the clause they appear in to be grammatically well-formed. Several examples help to illustrate this behavior:Subject complements:The cookiestastedeliciousSVC(s)?Johnisa teacherSVC(s)?RuthseemedtiredSVC(s)The role of complement is closely tied to specific verbs, sometimes calledcopula?or?linking verbs,?because they link the subject or object and its complement. The notable difference between a subject-complement construction and a subject-object construction is that the complement ‘completes’ the subject.?A teacher?specifies something about?John, just asdelicious?is how?the cookies?taste and?tired?is the state that?Ruth?is in. By contrast, in?Jane pushed her sister,?her sister?does not complement?Jane?but is the direct object of?pushed.Object complements?function very much like subject complements:Theyfoundthe moviedisappointingSVOC(o)?IconsiderSusiea geniusSVOC(o)?The partymadehimprime ministerSVOC(o)Just as subject complements predicate subjects, object complements predicate objects. Complements are generally not optional but required –?*They found the movie, *I consider Susie?and *The party made him?are each incomplete without the object complement (the same thing holds true for the subject examples above). Typically complements are noun phrases, predicative adjectives, or participles that behave similar to predicative adjectives (They found the moviedisappointing).AdverbialsIn contrast to complements, adverbials can generally be described as predicating either the verb or the entire clause. They are usually adverb phrases, temporal noun phrases or prepositional phrases.Heatethe cakeslowlySVOA?Shedropsthe eggsevery timeSVOA?The keysareon the table?SVA?While in the first two examples the adverbial is optional (He ate the cake?andShe dropped the eggs?are grammatical), the last example looks a little like a subject complement at first sight. However, looking more closely reveals that?on the table?answers the question of?where?the keys are. It modifies the entire clause and not just?the keys.It is important to point out is this context that terms in syntax in general and the terms?complement?and?adverbial?in particular are used with a variety of meanings by different linguists with different theoretical backgrounds. The relatively traditional terminology (which we use) poses certain problems, especially in cases that are fuzzy.ClausesLooking beyond phrases, the next larger structural unit we encounter are clauses. A clause is generally defined as consisting of a referring expression and a predicate (or NP + VP), which makes it possible to use the terms?clauseand?sentence?synonymously when dealing with simple sentences.John likes pizzaJohn likes pizza?and?Mary likes pastaJohn likes pizza?because?it tastes awesomeThe first is an example for a?simple sentence, the second for a?compound sentence?and the third for a?complex sentence.A simple sentence contains a single independent clause. Note that the clause may be quite long and contain a number of phrases, i.e.?The old miner’s fantastically rich cousin frequently traveled to South Africa many years ago?is still a simple pound sentences contain multiple clauses that are strung together via coordinating conjunctions (and, but, or) or parataxis (connection without a conjunction).Coordination:John likes pizza and Mary likes pastaParataxis:John likes pizza, Mary likes pastaFinally, complex sentences combine an independent clause with one or more dependent (or subordinate) clauses. Dependent clauses are generally signaled by?subordinating conjunctions?such as?because, since, after, while, althoughor?when, or by?relative pronouns?such as?who,?which?or?that.?While they always contain a referring expression and a predication, they often don’t make much sense on their own. Many textbook definitions therefore state that independent clauses represent ‘complete thoughts’, while dependent clauses do not.After he had called Mary,?John picked up the pizza?that he had ordered earlierThe example sentence begins with the dependent clause?After he had called Mary, followed by the independent clause?John picked up the pizza?which is in turn followed by the?relative clause?that he had ordered earlier. Only the independent clause sounds right on its own, while the dependent clauses seem incomplete by themselves.Relative clauses may be either restrictive or non-restrictive and provide more information about the subject or object of the main clause.Restrictive relative clause:The man who had lost his wallet decided to call the policeNon-restrictive relative clause:The man, who had lost his wallet, decided to call the policeThe difference between the two examples in one of meaning. The first sentence implies that a specific man (the one who lost his wallet) decided to call the police. By contrast, the second sentence is about a man who called the police – the information that he has also lost his wallet is given on the side.Clauses may be part of phrases. For example, restrictive relative clauses like the one above (who had lost hist wallet) are always part of a noun phrase. This embedding of clauses is also the reason why we can always assume the basic structure NP -> VP: the verb phrase will often contain other phrases and clauses.Finite vs. non-finite clausesDependent clauses exist in two basic varieties: finite and non-finite. In a non-finite clause the verb shows no inflectional agreement with the subject, while in the finite variant it does.When he saw the mess in the kitchen, John took a deep breath?(finite dependent clause)When seeing the mess in the kitchen, John took a deep breath?(non-finite dependent clause)Verb inflectionEnglish has three basic varieties of non-inflected verbals: participles, gerunds and infinitives. While participles act similar to adjectives, gerunds behave like nouns:Staring at the empty box, John took a deep breath?(participle)Arguing?will not help?(gerund)To-infinitives can fill subject and object roles (i.e. behave like nouns), or modify existing subjects or objects:To study?is the smart thing to do before an exam?(to-infinitive as subject)John was asked?to leave?(to-infinitive as object)He started?to talk?(to-infinitive as adverb)Key termsgrammatical – ungrammaticalreferring expression – predicationconstituentsconstituency testssubstitutionmovementquestion-formingphrasesnoun phraseverb phraseprepositional phraseheadednessphrase structureclausedependent – independentfinite – non-finiterelative clauserestrictive – non-restrictivecoordination – subordinationsentencessimple – compound – complextransitivityverb argumentssyntactic rolessubjectdirect objectindirect objectcomplementadverbialWritten by Cornelius in:?Summaries,Syntax?|?Mar102008--Session 8: Grammatical Categories and RelationsPeople have many associations with the term?grammar?and not all of them are necessarily positive. Grammar is often understood as something that one has to painfully acquire in school, while carefully avoiding all sorts of ‘mistakes’. A piece of conventional wisdom states that ‘language exists without the permission of grammarians’ and many people believe that certain uses of language are instances of ‘bad grammar’, that everyday spoken language and youth slang ‘lack grammar’ and that the grammar of their native language is deteriorating.From a strictly linguistic perspective, all of this is rubbish.Languages change over time, as do the needs of their speakers, and while a conversation with your friends may be linguistically?different?from a political speech, a piece of poetry or a newspaper article, it is neither ‘less grammatical’ nor ‘less meaningful’ in the linguistic sense of these terms.Just like any other aspect of language, linguists approach grammar descriptively – in other word, in the same way that a biologist approaches an organism or a physicist looks at molecules. Grammar is not a checklist of arbitrary?dos and don’ts?that educators, writers or the editors of the?Duden?have agreed on, but a set of mental rules that every unimpaired native speaker of a language has perfect command of. Whenever you open your mouth, you combine morphemes and words into highly systematic sequences, and this is what makes what you say comprehensible to others. To the linguist, ‘grammar’ is the invisible system that is at work every time a speaker formulates an utterance – a system without which communication would be impossible.Word classesOne of the oldest fundamentals of grammatical description (well over 2,000 years old, in fact) is the division of words into groups according to their meaning and function. These groups are called?word classes, lexical categories,lexical classes, or, in traditional grammar,?parts of speech. The traditional repertoire used to describe Indoeuropean languages like German an English includes eight, sometimes nine word classes:verbsnounspronounsadjectivesadverbsprepositionsconjunctionsdeterminersinterjectionsA basic division frequently made when looking at these categories is betweencontent words?and?function words?(also sometimes described as lexical vs. grammatical word classes). The distinction can be explained by examining the meaning of words such as?girl?(a noun),?run?(a verb) and?happy?(an adjective) vs.?but?(a conjunction) and?the?(an article). While?girl,?run?and?happy?point to something in the world (a kind of person, a kind of activity, a state)?but?and?thedo not point to anything – their meaning is purely language-internal (= grammatical). This difference is also noticeable when looking at what new words enter a language. Speakers come up with new nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs quite frequently, but when was the last time you heard that a new article or conjunction had been coined? Although new function words are also introduced into languages, this does not happen as often and usually takes much more time than the introduction of new content words. For this reason, linguists sometimes call content words an?open set, whereas function words are considered a?closed set.VerbsVerbs, along with nouns, form the most basic building blocks of the world’s languages and are generally considered to exist universally, though their form varies from one language to another. Verbs come in two basic varieties,transitive?and?intransitive, depending on the?arguments?they require (for more on verb arguments, see the summary for Session 9).John?saw?Mary?(see?needs an object – transitive)John?slept?(sleep?does not accept an object – intransitive)Depending on the kind of semantic information they convey, verbs can be classified as?stative?(which describe states, perceptions or cognitions) ordynamic?(which describe processes, actions or activities).Sue?plays?tennis?(dynamic)The wildfires?destroyed?the forest?(dynamic)Mike?likes?apple pie?(stative)It?seems?like yesterday that I took this class?(stative)Stative verbs can generally not be marked for progressive aspect (*Mike is liking apple pie, *It is seeming like yesterday).In English, the main verb is inflected for past tense (typically via the?-ed?suffix), progressive aspect (via the present participle, formed with the?-ing?suffix) and perfect aspect (via the past participle). On the third person, verb inflection also marks the combination of singular number and present tense (John likes?Mary).Auxiliary verbs?play an important role in English grammar.?Be?+ full verb is used to indicate passive voice (The authorities?were?notified by Sue) and progressive aspect (Sue?is?notifying the authorities), while?have?+ full verb is used to indicate perfect aspect (We?have?lived in this house for over ten years). Another type of auxiliary are the modal verbs?can, could, may, might, shall, should, will, would?and?must?which express the speaker’s intent and different degrees of certainty about the future. They are classified as auxiliaries because they can never act as the main verb of a sentence.NounsOften defined as a word that describes ‘a person, place or thing’, nouns are the quintessential content word class. English nouns as a lexical category can be subdivided into?proper nouns?and?common nouns, the former pointing to specific and distinct people, places or institutions (George W. Bush,Copenhagen,?Greenpeace,?The Queen of England) while the latter describes generic entities (car,?boy,?word,?boredom). Those common nouns that can be grammatically marked for plural via an allomorph of the plural morpheme (such as?-s,?-en, -?)?are called?count nouns, whereas nouns which cannot be marked in this fashion are known as?mass nouns. Mass nouns lack the ability to take a numeral article (compare?five cars?with *five informations) and are usually quantified with?much?and?less?instead of?many?and?fewer. They should not be confused with count nouns that are plural-marked with a zero (?) such asfive sheep, where?sheep?is clearly a countable entity.PronounsThe name ‘pronoun’ suggests any word that can take the place of noun in a sentence, but the differences between pronoun subtypes are so pronounced that they are sometimes classified as separate word classes. Types of pronouns include:personal pronounsdemonstrative pronounsinterrogative pronounsrelative pronounsindefinite pronounsPersonal pronouns such?as?I,?you,?he,?she,?it?and?they?are marked for thegrammatical category?of?person?(see below), in other words they identify who is speaking (first person), who is being addressed (second person) and who is being spoken about (third person). They are also marked for gender (he – she,him – her), number (I – we,?he/she – they) and case (I – me,?he/she – him/her,John’s).Demonstrative pronouns?refer to things which are close by (this,?these) or far away (that,?those), in relative proximal distance to the speaker. This distance must not necessarily be literal, but can also mark the speaker’s perception or attitude.Interrogative pronouns?are used to ask questions such as?who,?what,?why,when?and?where?(and?how, which is also considered a ‘wh-word’ in this context).Relative pronouns?such as?who,?that?and?which?signal relative clauses (see summary for Session 9).?Who?and?which?lead dual existences as both interrogative pronouns and relative pronouns:Who?saw him??(interrogative pronoun)Those?who?saw him waved?(relative pronoun)Indefinite pronouns?stand for unclear or semantically ‘empty’ referents. Examples for indefinite pronouns are anyone, everyone, no one, anybody, nobody, somebody, something?and?nothing.Note that pronouns stand by themselves and do not modify nouns. In the utterance?Whose?is?this??whose?and?this?are both pronouns, but in?Whose?t-shirt is?this?black one??they are determiners.AdjectivesAdjectives describe nouns and can occur either?attributively?or?predicatively, depending on whether they come before or after the noun they modify (the?tallgirl?vs.?the girl was?tall). They may be?gradable?(big?–?bigger?–?biggest) or?non-gradable?(beautiful?– *beautifuller?– *beautifullest) and can usually themselves be modified with?very?or?too. Finally, only adjectives can be used in constructions such as?It seems ___?or?He/she seems ___?.AdverbsAdverbs are a very heterogeneous word class and while many of its members can be identified via the suffix?-ly?(as is?loudly, quickly?etc) this isn’t always a reliable indicator of adverb-hood. Adverbs can modify verbs, adjectives and other adverbs and frequently indicate when, where, or to what degree something happens.He?quickly opened?the door?(adverb modifying verb)John read the?unbelievably exciting?novel?(adverb modifying adjective)Very soon, we will be out of marshmallows?(adverb modifying adverb)PrepositionsPrepositions typically provide semantic information about the spatial or temporal relation of something to something else. In English, they normally precede the noun they modify, while in other words they follow it (postpositions), which is why the more general name for this word class is?adposition. Prepositions are invariant in form (compare with adjectives) and constitute a relatively small category.ConjunctionsConjunctions are used to tie together clauses, either by?coordination?(John went to the movies?and?Mary came along) or?subordination?(Mary came alongbecause?she wanted to see the movie).?Coordinating conjunctions?tie together elements that are categorically similar (bread?and?butter,?left?or?right,tired?but?happy) while?subordinating conjunctions?express conditions (If?you do well on the test, let me know how you prepared for it), cause and effect (We didn’t see the show?since?we didn’t go to Boston) or temporal contrast (He took off his shoes?before?he entered the apartment).DeterminersDeterminers precede nouns and in English they provide restrictive information about possession and definiteness. Like pronouns, they can be divided into subclasses:definite and indefinite articles (the, a, an)demonstratives (this, that, these, those)possessives (my, our, your, her, his, its their)interrogatives (which, what, whose)InterjectionsInterjections are expressions such as?hey, wow, ouch, umm, yeah?and?hmmwhich are a vital part of every-day spoken language, but have no strictly semantic content. They are often excluded from grammatical classification because they primarily serve an emotive function and are in no immediate relation to the surrounding elements. One reason why they are often overlooked is their fairly low frequency in traditional written language, though they are popular in instant messaging and SMS.Grammatical categoriesThe term grammatical category broadly refers to a set of syntactic features that is conceptually similar and applies systematically to a linguistic expression. More concretely, grammatical categories that are salient in English aretenseaspectpersonnumbergendercasevoicemood/modalityTenseTense allows speakers to express information about temporal relations, typically by marking the verb. In strictly morphosyntactic terms, English has only two tenses: present and past tense. Futurity is expressed in English analytically viawill?or?going to?auxiliaries. Note that what is generally considered the English tense system in school books is more precisely the combination of present, past and future tense with simple, progressive, perfect and perfect-progressive aspect.TenseSimple AspectProgressive AspectPerfect AspectPerfect Progressive AspectPresenttake/sam/is/are takinghave/has takenhave/has been takingPasttookwas/were takinghad takenhad been takingFuturewill/shall takewill be takingwill have takenwill have been takingAspectIn English, the category of aspect allows speakers to mark actions expressed by verbs as completed, ongoing, recurrent or habitual. Note that aspect concerns the action expressed by the verb as a process and not its temporal location in the past, present or future. While many school grammars treat the present perfect as a sort of past tense, an utterance such as?I have eaten?strictly only implies that this action has occurred and that it was completed, not?when?it took place. Temporal relations are expressed by tense, leaving aspect to add information about the status of something as ongoing or completed.PersonThe participant role of an individual in discourse is signaled via grammatical person, in English specifically via the personal pronouns of the first, second and third person (see also pronouns – personal pronouns). English lacks certain marked distinctions in the pronominal system made by many other languages, for example the distinction between a formal and a more familiar second person (vous – tu,?Sie – Du) and between singular and plural on the second person.SingularPluralSubjectiveObjectivePossessiveReflexiveSubjectiveObjectivePossessiveReflexiveFirstImeminemyselfweusoursourselvesSecondyouyouyoursyourselfyouyouyoursyourselvesThirdMasculinehehimhishimselftheythemtheirsthemselvesFemininesheherhersherselfNeuteritititsitselfNote that the paradigm reproduced above represents standard Modern English – the pronominal system shows considerable dialectal variation.NumberThe grammatical category of number describes count information (one, more than one, in some languages additional cases) that is encoded via inflection. In English, nouns, pronouns and verbs can indicate number. Due to its mixed vocabulary, English nouns of Latin and Greek origin form irregular plurals (alumnus – alumni), while some nouns are marked with a zero (deer – deer,sheep – sheep) or via umlaut (foot – feet,?woman – women).GenderGrammatical gender is a form of noun classification that is common in many Indoeuropean languages. Some languages encode two genders (French), others three (German, Latin), but in other language families even wider systems of classification exist (for example, see the four-way distinction made in?Dyirbal, spoken in Australia). Gender marking, which was relatively similar to German during the Old English period, has been lost to a large extent in Modern English. Exceptions are: personal pronouns (he – she – it), possessive determiners (her car,?his shirt), relative pronouns?(who/whom – which) and gendered nouns (prince – princess, heir – heiress, actor – actress). In those relatively few cases where English retains gender marking, grammatical and biological gender coincide relatively closely, whereas in languages with full grammatical gender the choice is often more idiosyncratic (e.g. German:?der Junge?–?das?M?dchen).VoiceVoice is a category that describes the relationship of verb arguments to one another. English distinguishes between?active?and?passive?voice and uses a periphrastic construction (be?+ past participle) to realize the passive. In a passive construction, the direct object becomes the subject of the verb while the former subject is either omitted or moved into an adverbial:John likes pie?(active voice)Pie is liked by John?(passive voice)Mood/ModalityGrammatical mood describes certainty, world-knowledge and the intent of speakers regarding what they express. In English, mood and modality, which is the expression of inference (epistemic modality) or conviction that something should be done (deontic modality), are largely identical, but other languages encode other semantic information through this category.Sally is a teacher?(indicative)Sally must be a teacher?(potential)Semantically, the example illustrates the inference encoded in the second sentence: the speaker is assuming that Sally is a teacher. As with other categories, the stricter definition of mood assumes morphosyntactic encoding, as it exists in the German subjunctive:Er ist müde?(indicative)Es sagt, dass er müde sei?(subjunctive)However, there is a strong tendency in German to avoid this kind of usage and it is rare in spoken language:Er sagt, dass er müde ist?(‘implied’ subjunctive)Key termsdescriptive vs. prescriptive grammarcontent words – function words, open set – closed setword classesverbstransitive – intrasitivedynamic – stativefull – auxiliarynounsproper – commoncount – masspronounspersonaldemonstrativeinterrogativerelativeindefiniteadjectivesattributive – predicativegradable – non-gradableadverbsprepositionsconjunctionscoordinating – subordinatingdeterminersdefinite and indefinite articlesdemonstrativespossessivesinterrogativesinterjectionsgrammatical categoriestenseaspectpersonnumbergendercasevoicemood/modalityWritten by Cornelius in:?Summaries,Syntax?|? ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download