Tables
APPENDICES
|Appendix A. Operationalization control variables |
| | |Minimum |Maximum |Mean |Std. Deviation |
|Variable |Values | | | | |
|Gender |0 = male; 1 = female |0 |1 |0.48 |0.50 |
|Age |in years |15 |93 |36 |14 |
|Education |(0) uncompleted elementary; (1) completed |0 |7 |2.97 |2.53 |
| |elementary; (2) incomplete vocational/technical; | | | | |
| |(3) complete vocational/technical; (4) incomplete | | | | |
| |preparatory university; (5) complete preparatory | | | | |
| |university; (6) some university/lower level higher | | | | |
| |education; (7) university with degree/higher level | | | | |
| |higher education | | | | |
|Socio-economic |(0) Lower class; (1) working class; (2) lower |0 |4 |1.75 |0.95 |
|class |middle class; (3) upper middle class; (4) upper | | | | |
| |class | | | | |
|Income |10 steps (0 = lowest; 9 = highest) |0 |9 |3.75 |2.21 |
|N = 8,332 |
|Source: WVS (Egypt, 2000; Iraq, 2001, 2006; Jordan, 2001, 2007; Morocco, 2007; Saudi Arabia, 2003). |
|Notes: The statistics on income do not include the inputted scores for Jordan 2007. The gender ratio, age and education (in terms of illiteracy|
|rates) have been compared to general population statistics (CIA World Factbook) for these countries and turn out to be roughly the same: the |
|illiteracy rates and age are a bit higher, but this can be related to the surveys only included people 18 years of age and over. |
|Appendix B. Factor analysis on items of support for democracy |
| |Factor 1 |Factor 2* |Factor 3 |
|Political system: Having experts make decisions | | |0.443 |
|Political system: Having the army rule | | | |
|Political system: Having a democratic political system | |0.468 | |
|In democracy, the economic system runs badly |0.617 | | |
|Democracies are indecisive and have too much squabbling |0.824 | | |
|Democracy may have problems but is better | |0.464 | |
|Eigenvalue |1.599 |1.346 |1.052 |
|% of Variance |25.8 |22.4 |17.5 |
|*The items related to this factor are used in the regression analyses, since they seem to be conceptually closest to the theoretical factor in this |
|study. |
|Source: WVS (All Arab countries with all items available: Morocco, 2001; Iraq, 2001, 2006; Jordan, 2001); N = 3,407. |
|Note: Factor loadings with a weight less than 0.3 are not included in the table. Principal Axis Factoring with oblique rotation was used. |
|Appendix C. Tolerance items include per country |
| | | | | | | |Saudi Arabia|
|Would not like to have neighbours who |Egypt 2000|Iraq 2004 |Iraq 2006 |Jordan 2001 |Jordan 2007 |Morocco 2007 |2003 |
|are: … | | | | | | | |
|Different race |X | | |X |X |X |X |
|Immigrants/foreign workers |X | | |X |X |X |X |
|Jews |X |X |X | | | | |
|Different religion | |X |X |X |X |X |X |
|Different language | | | | |X |X | |
|Christians | |X |X | | | | |
|Kurds, Esids | |X |X | | | | |
|From another country of origin | | | |X | | | |
|Appendix D. Factor analysis on items of commitment and orthodoxy |
| |Factor 1* |Factor 2* |Factor 3 |
|Are you a religious person? (0–2) |0.321 | | |
|How often do you attend religious service? (0–6) | | | |
|How important in life is: Religion? (0–3) |0.458 | | |
|How important is God in your life? (0–1) | | | |
|What are important child qualities?: religious faith (0–9) |-0.392 | | |
|Is suicide justifiable? (0–9) | |0.423 | |
|Is drinking alcohol justifiable? (0–9) | |0.425 | |
|Eigenvalue |1.500 |1.066 |1.013 |
|% of Variance |21.4 |15.2 |14.5 |
|*These items related to this factor are used in the regression analyses, since they seem to be conceptually closest to the |
|theoretical factor in this study. |
|Source: WVS (All Arab countries with all items available: Egypt, 2000; Jordan, 2001; Morocco, 2001); N=2,978. |
|Note: Factor loadings with a weight less than 0.3 are not included in the table. Principal Axis Factoring with oblique rotation |
|was used. |
|Appendix E. Factor analysis of items on the relationship between of politics and Islam |
| |Factor 1* |Factor 2* |
|Politicians who don’t believe in God are unfit for public office (0–4) | | |
|Churches give answers: the social problems (0–1) | |0.433 |
|Religious leaders should not influence how people vote (0–4) | |0.245 |
|Better if more people with strong religious beliefs in public office (0–4) |0.558 | |
|Only laws of the Shari’a (0–4) |0.620 | |
|Eigenvalue |1.559 |1.007 |
|% of Variance |31.2 |20.1 |
|*These items related to this factor are used in the regression analyses, since they seem to be conceptually closest to the theoretical|
|factor in this study. |
|Source: WVS (All Arab countries with all items available: Egypt, 2000; Iraq, 2001, 2006; Jordan, 2001); N = 2,978. |
|Note: Factor loadings with a weight less than 0.2 are not included in the table. Principal Axis Factoring with oblique rotation was |
|used. |
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- simple interest tables for loans
- mortgage rate tables monthly payments
- minecraft custom crafting tables mod
- indoor water tables for children
- 3rd grade times tables worksheets
- amortization tables free online
- annuity tables calculator
- free tables and graphs worksheets
- life expectancy tables 2019 male
- life expectancy tables 2020
- interest rate tables for mortgage loans
- us life expectancy tables 2020