COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS



STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

REGULAR MEETING

TUESDAY, JULY 31, 2007, 9:00 AM

Board of Supervisors North Chamber

1600 Pacific Highway, Room 310, San Diego, California

MORNING SESSION: – Meeting was called to order at 9:06 a.m.

PRESENT: Supervisors Ron Roberts, Chairman; Greg Cox, Vice-Chairman;

Dianne Jacob; Pam Slater-Price; Bill Horn; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.

Invocation was led by Pastor Jon Doolittle of Clairemont Lutheran Church.

Pledge of Allegiance was led by University City Girl Scout Troop #3004 – Sierra Varano, Michaela Brown, Ally Blumenfeld, Zoe Dorman, Samantha Dorman, and Sonia Aceves.

|Category |Agenda No. |Subject |

|Public Safety |1. |DISTRICT ATTORNEY REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF OUT OF COUNTRY TRAVEL |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUE] |

| | | |

| |2. |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – SPOUSAL ABUSER PROSECUTION PROGRAM GRANT AWARD |

| | | |

| |3. |SHERIFF’S ACCEPTANCE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL |

| | |(ABC) GRANT |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): UNANTICIPATED REVENUE FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF |

| | |ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL] |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

| |4. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES |

| | | |

| |5. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT OF LESS-LETHAL TASER WEAPONS |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): PROPOSITION 172 REVENUE] |

| | | |

|Health & Human Services |6. |HIV/AIDS REVENUE APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FEDERAL RWTMA PART A AND PART B] |

| | | |

|Community Services |7. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |CONSIDER PROPOSALS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CEDAR/KETTNER PROPERTY; APPROVE EXCLUSIVE |

| | |NEGOTIATION CONTRACT; AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND CONSULTANT CONTRACT & OFFICE SPACE |

| | |SEARCH |

| | | |

| |8. |FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ALTERNATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, 110 WEST |

| | |“C” STREET, SAN DIEGO |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUES] |

| | | |

| |9. |SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF RECORDED BOOK, RANDOM HOUSE, AND MIDWEST TAPE MATERIALS |

| | |FOR THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY LIBRARY |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |10. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES |

| | |DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF COMMUNITY HOUSING WORKS FOR THE TURNAGAIN ARMS |

| | |APARTMENTS |

| | | |

| |11. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE: VALLEY CENTER-PAUMA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT |

| | | |

| |12. |ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK CONTRACTS TO SUPPORT THE IMAGING SYSTEM AND CONSULTANT|

| | |SERVICES |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): RECORDER’S MODERNIZATION TRUST FUND] |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| |13. |AUTHORIZE ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK TO ENTER INTO STANDARD VENDOR AGREEMENT FOR |

| | |THE PURCHASE OF ANNUAL IMAGE SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE |

| | | |

| |14. |COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION FOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION/ DEFINED CONTRIBUTION SERVICES |

| | |NEGOTIATION/AWARD OF CONTRACT |

| | | |

| |15. |ADOPTION OF FINAL FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 BUDGET FOR THE COUNTY SERVICE AREAS, |

| | |MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS, AND PERMANENT ROAD DIVISIONS |

| | | |

| |16. |COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 FINAL BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR FAMILY OF FUNDS, |

| | |ENTERPRISE FUNDS AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, PRIOR YEAR ENCUMBRANCES, FLEET SERVICES |

| | |TRANSFER AND PENALTY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION |

| | | |

| |17. |FIXING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND SPECIAL DISTRICT TAX RATES AND LEVYING TAXES FOR |

| | |FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 |

| | | |

| |18. |RESPONSE TO 2006-2007 GRAND JURY REPORTS |

| | | |

| |19. |COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO’S WORK SAFE/STAY HEALTHY PROGRAM |

| | | |

| |20. |OUT-OF-COUNTY AND IN-COUNTY BUSINESS TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENTS |

| | | |

| |21. |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 5) |

| | | |

| |22. |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 4) |

| | | |

| |23. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS (DISTRICT: 1) |

| | | |

|Communications Received |24. |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED |

| | | |

|Appointments |25. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |APPOINTMENTS |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |26. |APPROVAL OF STATEMENT OF MUTUALLY SHARED PRINCIPLES BETWEEN SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND THE |

| | |YUZHONG DISTRICT, CHONGQING MUNICIPALITY OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA |

| | | |

| |27. |SUPPORT FOR SB 10 (KEHOE): SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY REFORM ACT OF |

| | |2007 |

| | | |

| |28. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS GRANTS (DISTRICT: 3) |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): COMMUNITY PROJECTS BUDGET (ORG 0263)] |

| | | |

| |29. |ADMINISTRIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION |

| | |ORDINANCE |

| | | |

|Public Safety |30. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: REQUEST TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE |

| | |AMENDING SECTION 363 OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO PROBATION |

| | |DEPARTMENT FEES AND CHARGES |

| | | |

|Closed Session |31. |CLOSED SESSION |

| | | |

|Presentations/Awards |32. |Presentations/awards |

| | | |

|Public Communication |33. |PUBLIC COMMUNICATION |

| | | |

|1. |SUBJECT: |DISTRICT ATTORNEY REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF OUT OF COUNTRY TRAVEL (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |In accordance with Board of Supervisors Policy D-7, Out-of-County Business and Related Guidelines and Processes, this is a |

| |request for one (1) Deputy District Attorney III and one (1) District Attorney Investigator II to travel to Toronto, Canada to |

| |attend the 38th Annual International Association of Financial Crimes Investigators Training Conference from August 26, 2007, to |

| |September 1, 2007. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2007-09 Adopted Operational Plan for the District Attorney. The funding |

| |source is general purpose revenue. If approved, this request will result in current year travel costs of approximately $5,400, |

| |no annual costs, and will require the addition of zero staff years. No overtime costs will be incurred as a result of this trip.|

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY |

| |Approve travel and per diem to Toronto, Canada, for one (1) Deputy District Attorney III and one (1) District Attorney |

| |Investigator II to travel to Toronto, Canada to attend the 38th Annual International Association of Financial Crimes |

| |Investigators Training Conference from August 26, 2007, to September 1, 2007. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer, in consultation with the District Attorney's Office, to select the one (1) Deputy |

| |District Attorney III and the one (1) District Attorney Investigator II who will attend the 38th Annual International Association|

| |of Financial Crimes Investigators Training Conference. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|2. |SUBJECT: |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – SPOUSAL ABUSER PROSECUTION PROGRAM GRANT AWARD (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to ratify the submission of the grant application and approve the acceptance from the State of California, |

| |Department of Justice, Spousal Abuser Prosecution Program (SAPP) grant in the amount of $102,080 for the period July 1, 2007 |

| |through June 30, 2008. SAPP is a vertical prosecution program that enhances the effort to prosecute and convict individuals |

| |arrested for spousal abuse crimes. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2007-09 Adopted Operational Plan. If approved, this request will |

| |result in Fiscal Year 2007-08 direct costs of $122,496 and revenue from the State of California, Department of Justice in the |

| |amount of $102,080. Currently budgeted salaries are allocated to satisfy the 20% required in-kind match of $20,416. No |

| |additional staff years are required. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, and Revenue Contracts – Department responsibility for cost recovery, which requires full |

| |cost recovery for grants and prior approval of the submission of grant applications. |

| |Adopt the resolution entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO THE SPOUSAL ABUSER|

| |PROSECUTION PROGRAM GRANT” ratifying the grant application submission and acceptance from the State of California, Department of |

| |Justice, Spousal Abuser Prosecution Program Grant in the amount of $102,080 for Fiscal Year 2007-08. |

| |Authorize the execution of the grant agreement and other grant documents by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors including |

| |extensions and amendments thereof that do not materially impact or alter either the grant program or funding level. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution |

| |No. 07-158 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO THE SPOUSAL ABUSER |

| |PROSECUTION PROGRAM GRANT. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|3. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S ACCEPTANCE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) GRANT |

| | |(DISTRICT: 2) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to authorize the acceptance of a $101,636 grant from the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage |

| |Control (ABC). The project goal is to reduce Part 1 and Part 2 crimes in the Santee and Alpine station’s service areas through |

| |prevention, education, and enforcement. Retailers will be educated through IMPACT (Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol-Related |

| |Crime Tendencies) and LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training. Deputies will be educated and trained in alcohol |

| |enforcement and will conduct a series of shoulder tap, minor decoy, over intoxicated patron, and high intensity directed DUI |

| |operations on overtime. Violators will have criminal cases filed against them through the County court system and licensees will|

| |have administrative cases initiated against them through ABC. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are not budgeted in the Sheriff’s Fiscal Year 2007-08 Revised CAO Proposed Budget. The funding source is |

| |unanticipated revenue from the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. If approved, this request will |

| |result in Fiscal Year 2007-08 cost and revenue of $101,636, and require the addition of zero staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |

| | |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts – Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery, which requires full cost |

| |recovery for grants and requires that Board approval be given in advance of application for funds |

| | |

| |Ratify the submission and authorize acceptance of a grant in the amount of $101,636 from the State of California Department of |

| |Alcoholic Beverage Control for the Grant Assistance Program for the period from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Sheriff to execute the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control grant documents, including any |

| |annual extensions, amendments, and/or revisions thereof that do not materially impact or alter the services or funding level. |

| | |

| |Adopt a resolution entitled, “RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVIOSRS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT |

| |FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL GRANTS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.” |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations in Fiscal Year 2007-08 of $101,636 in the Sheriff’s Department for salaries and benefits ($93,436) and |

| |services and supplies ($8,200) based on unanticipated revenue from the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage |

| |Control. (4 VOTES) |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution |

| |No. 07-159 entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FROM THE |

| |STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC). |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|4. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On October 16, 2001 (11), the Board authorized the award of a contract to provide psychological services for Sheriff’s Department|

| |employees and their immediate families. The Counseling Team, a psychological employee assistance service provider, was awarded |

| |the competitively procured contract. The current contract with The Counseling Team ends October 31, 2007. The Sheriff’s |

| |Department requests approval to enter into a sole source procurement with The Counseling Team for two years and an additional six|

| |months if needed. Approval of this request will enable the Sheriff’s Department to have uninterrupted continuation of ongoing |

| |counseling services. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2007-09 Adopted Operational Plan. If approved, current year costs will be |

| |approximately $208,000; costs will remain approximately $208,000 for Fiscal Year 2008-09. This request will require no |

| |additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting |

| |to enter into negotiations with The Counseling Team; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price, award a contract for Department employees psychological services for two years and an additional six months if |

| |needed, and to amend the contracts as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to approval of the Sheriff. |

| |Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|5. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT OF LESS-LETHAL TASER WEAPONS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The San Diego County Sheriff’s Department has been a leader within the law enforcement community when it comes to non-lethal and |

| |less-lethal weapons and currently has various types of non-lethal and less-lethal weapons available to deputies. On October 25, |

| |2005 (3), your Board approved the initial procurement of over 800 TASERs for deployment to the Department’s Patrol Deputies. The|

| |deployment of the TASER has proven very successful in the field in defusing confrontational situations. This request is for the |

| |sole source procurement of handheld less-lethal TASER weapons and munitions from ProForce Law Enforcement, the regional |

| |distributor for TASER International Inc. The additional TASERs will be deployed to Department Law Enforcement special units and |

| |Court Deputies. TASER International Inc. is the only provider of TASER type devices. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2007-09 Adopted Operational Plan. The funding source is Proposition 172 |

| |Revenue. If approved, this request will result in current and subsequent year costs and revenue of approximately $200,000 |

| |annually. If approved, this request will require no additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Purchasing and Contracting Director to |

| |enter into negotiations with TASER International or an authorized distributor; and subject to successful negotiations and |

| |determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a three year contract to acquire the less-lethal TASER, munitions, |

| |accessories and maintenance for the period July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010 and an additional six months if needed. Waive the |

| |advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|6. |SUBJECT: |HIV/AIDS REVENUE APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On December 19, 2006, the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006 (RWTMA) was signed into law, which reauthorized|

| |the former Ryan White CARE Act for three years through September 30, 2009. On March 20, 2007 (8), the Board approved acceptance |

| |of the Year 17 RWTMA Part A and B (former Titles I and II) grant. The total amount awarded to San Diego was $9,681,362 under |

| |Part A and $908,433 under Part B, totaling $10,589,795. At that time, the Board also authorized staff to submit applications for|

| |additional RWTMA Part F Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) funding. The MAI application was submitted on May 31, 2007, for the |

| |period of August 1, 2007 through July 31, 2008. |

| | |

| |Today’s action requests Board approval to accept the Year 17 MAI grant for an amount estimated at $1,147,059 and to sign any |

| |required agreements for MAI funding. It is anticipated that funds will be awarded on or about August 1, 2007. Authority is also|

| |requested for the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to conduct a competitive solicitation for new MAI-funded HIV/AIDS |

| |services, with contracts to be in effect for a twelve-month period, with four option years. |

| | |

| |In addition, Board authorization is requested for staff to submit applications for the eighteenth year of RWTMA Part A funding |

| |for the period of March 1, 2008 through February 28, 2009 and for the eighteenth year of Part B funding for the period of |

| |April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The Fiscal Year 2007-09 Operational Plan includes costs and revenue of $9,593,505 for this proposal. The funding sources are |

| |federal RWTMA Part A ($8,805,793), Part B ($787,712). This amount differs from the amount awarded (9,681,362 for Part A and |

| |$908,433 for Part B for a total of $10,589,795) because the County was not notified of the award amount until after the |

| |Operational Plan was prepared. Once the County is notified of the award amount for MAI funding, staff will return to the Board |

| |to appropriate the additional funds and will also address the additional amount awarded for RWTMA Parts A and B. There will be |

| |no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Accept approximately $1,147,059 in Year 17 federal Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006 (RWTMA) Part F |

| |Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) revenue to provide HIV-related services to persons with HIV/AIDS for the period of August 1, 2007 |

| |through July 31, 2008. |

| | |

| |Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute, upon receipt, any required agreements for MAI funding. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Section 401, et seq of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and |

| |Contracting to issue a competitive solicitation funded by the federal RWTMA Part F MAI to procure MAI HIV/AIDS Services. Upon |

| |successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award contacts for terms of one year with four renewal |

| |option years, and up to an additional six months if necessary, pending availability of funds; and to amend the contract as |

| |required to reflect changes to services and funding allocations, subject to the approval of the Director, Health and Human |

| |Services Agency. |

| | |

| |Authorize the submission of applications for Year 18 of federal RWTMA Part A and Part B funding. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, upon receipt, to sign the applications and related assurances. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|7. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |CONSIDER PROPOSALS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CEDAR/KETTNER PROPERTY; APPROVE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION CONTRACT; |

| | |AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND CONSULTANT CONTRACT & OFFICE SPACE SEARCH (DISTRICT: 4) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On March 20, 2007 (11), the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution to consider proposals to develop the County-owned |

| |Cedar/Kettner property in downtown San Diego. The resolution set a hearing for July 31, 2007 for the Board to receive and |

| |consider responses to the County's Request for Proposals that was issued for the development and to receive a recommendation for |

| |selection of a developer. The goal of the development is to maximize revenue to the County and provide up to 750 parking spaces |

| |for County use as part of the Waterfront Park project. A Source Selection Committee reviewed the five proposals received and |

| |recommends Clark Realty Capital, LLC for the project. |

| | |

| |Today's action requests the Board's approval of the recommended developer and authorization for further negotiations with Clark |

| |Realty Capital, LLC to develop a Disposition and Development Agreement. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Approval of the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) will result in the receipt of a deposit in the amount of $150,000 from |

| |Clark Realty Capital, LLC. That fee, in addition to its initial application fee of $50,000, will be used to offset prior year |

| |County staff and consultant costs of $115,000 and estimated current year ENA costs of $142,000, a total of $257,000 in one-time |

| |costs up to completion of negotiations for a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) by January 2008. The original source of|

| |seed funding was Community Service Group management reserves, which will be reimbursed by the developer fees. There are no |

| |ongoing costs and no additional staff required. |

| | |

| |Should a DDA be approved by the Board, staff and consultant costs for construction management oversight and contingency are |

| |estimated at $900,000. These costs will be partially offset by a further developer deposit of $150,000 to be delivered to the |

| |County at DDA execution, with the balance of funding to be requested from the General Fund. |

| | |

| |The additional cost to relocate the two County offices in the Star Builder’s Building will be approximately $200,000 in one-time |

| |costs for both offices and $120,000 in net additional ongoing cost for both offices, assuming leased space is sought for both |

| |groups. General Fund resources will be requested for relocation of both the Public Safety Group and Health and Human Services |

| |Agency’s Veteran’s Service Office. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Find, that the proposed actions are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15004 (b) of the|

| |Guidelines because it is too early in the conceptualization, design, and planning process to evaluate the environmental impacts. |

| | |

| |Find, in accordance with Government Code section 25515.2 (h), that the proposals have been received. |

| | |

| |Adopt the Source Selection Committee's recommendation to select Clark Realty Capital, LLC as the developer of the Cedar/Kettner |

| |property. |

| | |

| |Approve and authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to execute three copies of the Exclusive Negotiation |

| |Agreement (ENA) for the Cedar/Kettner property with Clark Realty Capital, LLC. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to negotiate the business points of a Disposition and Development |

| |Agreement for the Cedar/Kettner property with Clark Realty Capital, LLC. |

| | |

| |6. Direct the Director of General Services to seek appropriate replacement office space in the San Diego area for the Public |

| |Safety Group and the Health and Human Services Agency’s Veteran’s Service office, currently located in the Star Builder’s |

| |Building. |

| | |

| |7. Direct the Director of the Department of General Services to return to the Board for approval of a Disposition and Development|

| |Agreement for the County's Cedar/Kettner property, should negotiations with Clark Realty Capital, LLC result in a tentative |

| |agreement, or alternatively, to report that negotiations were unsuccessful. |

| | |

| |8. In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and |

| |Contracting, to amend Contract No. 518514 with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., real estate consultants, to add the provision for|

| |additional developer negotiation time; and to amend the contract as required to reflect changes to services and funding |

| |allocations, subject to the approval of the Director, Department of General Services. Waive the advertising requirement of Board|

| |Policy A-87. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors closed the Hearing and took action as |

| |recommended. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|8. |SUBJECT: |FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ALTERNATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, 110 WEST “C” STREET, SAN DIEGO|

| | |(DISTRICT: 1) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to approve a First Amendment to the Alternate Public Defender’s office space lease in downtown San Diego in |

| |order to provide for a five-year extension of term, add 2,819 square feet of additional space, adjust the monthly rent, and |

| |provide for minor turnkey tenant improvements. The new base monthly rent for the 16,819- square-foot lease is $2.06 per square |

| |foot per month with an annual three and one-half percent cost of living adjustment. This is within the range of recent |

| |comparable transactions. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are budgeted. If approved, this request will result in $336,770 current year cost, $423,843 annual cost, |

| |and will require no additional staff years. The funding source is the general purpose revenues. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |1. Find in accordance with Section 15301(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, that the First |

| |Amendment to the Lease Agreement is categorically exempt from the provisions of the guidelines as it involves a continuation of |

| |an existing use and minor alterations of an existing private structure. |

| | |

| |2. Approve and authorize the Director of General Services to execute three copies of the First Amendment to Lease for 16,819 |

| |square feet of office space for the Office of Alternate Public Defender, 110 West “C” Street, San Diego. |

| | |

| |3. Authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to exercise the option to extend the lease, prior to its expiration, |

| |if appropriate, and subject to the approval of the Director, Alternate Public Defender. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|9. |SUBJECT: |SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF RECORDED BOOK, RANDOM HOUSE, AND MIDWEST TAPE MATERIALS FOR THE SAN DIEGO |

| | |COUNTY LIBRARY (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |San Diego County Library (SDCL) spends approximately $4,000,000 annually on print, audio, visual, and electronic resources for |

| |use by the public. Due to proprietary licensing, many audio materials requested by the public are only available from a single |

| |supplier. If approved, this request would allow sole source procurement of audio books from Recorded Books and Random House, in |

| |the total annual amount of $450,000, complying with the provisions of Board of Supervisor’s Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |In addition, materials placed on the shelves in the library branches must be processed and added to the library database. In |

| |order to place the most popular video titles by the availability date in stores and rental businesses, pre-processing these |

| |materials by the vendor is necessary. This need for pre-processing requires procurement of some DVD items from a single supplier|

| |able to pre-process materials to the specifications needed by SDCL. If approved, this request would allow sole source procurement|

| |of DVDs from Midwest Tapes in the annual amount of $150,000, complying with the provisions of Board of Supervisor’s Policy A-87. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funding for this proposal in the amount of $600,000 per year is included in the Fiscal Year 2007-09 Operational Plan. If |

| |approved, this request will not result in any changes to costs or revenue and will not result in the addition of staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into |

| |negotiations with Recorded Books; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award |

| |a contract for audio books and downloadable audio and video content for the period of August 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008, and |

| |four option years through June 30, 2012 and up to an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract as required for |

| |changes to funding and services, subject to the approval of the Director, San Diego County Library. Waive the advertising |

| |requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into |

| |negotiations with Random House; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a |

| |contract for audio books for the period of August 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008, and four option years through June 30, 2012 and |

| |up to an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract as required for changes to funding and services, subject to |

| |the approval of the Director, San Diego County Library. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into |

| |negotiations with Midwest Tapes; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a|

| |contract for DVDs for the period of August 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008, and four option years through June 30, 2012 and up to |

| |an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract as required for changes to funding and services, subject to the |

| |approval of the Director, San Diego County Library. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|10. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ON |

| | |BEHALF OF COMMUNITY HOUSING WORKS FOR THE TURNAGAIN ARMS APARTMENTS (DISTRICT: 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County has received a request from the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the “Authority”) to conduct a |

| |public hearing as required by the Internal Revenue Code in order to issue tax-exempt revenue bonds (the “Bonds”) in an aggregate |

| |amount not to exceed $7,500,000 on behalf of Community Housing Works (the “Borrower”). The Borrower will use the proceeds of the|

| |Bonds for the acquisition, rehabilitation, and development of an 80-unit multifamily rental housing facility, to be commonly |

| |known as Turnagain Arms Apartments, located at 920 East Mission Road, Fallbrook in the unincorporated section of the County of |

| |San Diego (the “Project”). |

| | |

| |The Authority is a California joint exercise of powers authority, organized and existing under the laws of the State of |

| |California, specifically the California Government Code Section 6500. Under the California Government Code, cities and counties |

| |are authorized to form by agreement a governmental entity that combines the powers of such entities to perform certain |

| |governmental functions specifically outlined in the Agreement. With respect to the Authority, over 460 California cities, |

| |counties and special districts have entered into and executed the Agreement to become a member of the Authority. The Authority is|

| |authorized to assist in the financing of multi-family housing projects. |

| | |

| |In order for the Authority to issue such Bonds, the County must (1) conduct a public hearing allowing members of the public to |

| |comment on the proposed Project, and (2) approve of the Authority’s issuance of Bonds. Although the Authority (not the County) |

| |will be the issuer of the tax-exempt revenue bonds for the Project, the financing cannot proceed without the County, as the |

| |governmental entity having jurisdiction over the site, approving the Authority’s issuance of indebtedness. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |If approved, this proposal will result in $1,000 of revenue to be used to fund the County’s Investor Relation Program as approved|

| |by the Board of Supervisors in the County’s Debt Management Policy (B-65). No additional staff years will be required. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND DEBT ADVISORY COMMITTEE |

| |Pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, hold a public hearing regarding the financing of the project. |

| | |

| |Adopt the resolution approving the Authority’s issuance of not to exceed $7,500,000 of tax-exempt obligations on behalf of |

| |Community Housing Works for the Turnagain Arms Apartments. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board closed the Hearing and took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent, adopting Resolution No. 07-160 entitled: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE |

| |COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF THE ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE TURNAGAIN |

| |ARMS APARTMENTS. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|11. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE: VALLEY CENTER-PAUMA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Board of Supervisors serves as the Code Reviewing Body for any Local Government Agency, other than cities, with jurisdiction |

| |wholly within the County, per Government Code Section 82011. The recommended action would approve the amended Conflict of |

| |Interest Codes submitted by Valley Center-Pauma Unified School District. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |None. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve the amended Conflict of Interest Codes for Valley Center-Pauma Unified School District. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board of Supervisors closed the Hearing and took action as |

| |recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|12. |SUBJECT: |ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK CONTRACTS TO SUPPORT THE IMAGING SYSTEM AND CONSULTANT SERVICES |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to authorize categorical exemptions to Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, to authorize the Director of|

| |Purchasing and Contracting to enter into negotiations and award contracts for services to support the Assessor/ Recorder/County |

| |Clerk’s imaging system. |

| | |

| |The Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk (ARCC) operates an imaging system that is the backbone to the department’s operations. Wave |

| |Imaging Corporation (WIC) custom-developed this imaging system and is the sole vendor that can provide maintenance/ support |

| |services and upgrades. ARCC’s contract with this vendor for engineering upgrade services expired on June 30, 2007. Approval of |

| |this request will allow the ARCC to continue utilizing WIC for engineering upgrade services to ensure the continuing operation |

| |and upgrades of the department’s imaging system. |

| | |

| |ARCC also contracts with Von Kettler (DBA Advance Database Management) to provide maintenance and support services for various |

| |ARCC database applications. This contract expired on June 30, 2007. Approval of this request will allow the ARCC to continue |

| |utilizing Von Kettler in order to maintain database applications that are vital to assessing property, property tax |

| |administration, and recording. |

| | |

| |Additionally, ARCC contracts with Viking Software Solutions for various internal data entry system activities. The purpose of |

| |this contract is to upgrade to the latest version of this proprietary software as well as to perform various enhancements to the |

| |data entry system. Approval of this contract is critical to facilitate ARCC in developing more robust digital-based computing |

| |environments such as an electronic recording platform and integrating all property tax services. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are partially budgeted. The funding source will be the Recorder’s Modernization Trust Fund. If approved, |

| |this request will result in $995,830 in current year costs with offsetting revenue. Funds in the amount of $186,960 are budgeted |

| |in the Fiscal Year 2007-08 Operational Plan with the remaining $808,870 being offset by the Modernization Trust Fund. This |

| |request requires no additional staff and has no cost to the General Fund. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing & Contracting to |

| |enter into negotiations with Wave Imaging Corporation (WIC); and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair |

| |and reasonable price, award a contract to Wave Imaging Corporation for engineering upgrade services associated with new document |

| |management and imaging application development for ARCC’s existing imaging system. The contract period will be for one (1) year,|

| |July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2008, and two (2) one-year option periods through June 30, 2010, and an additional six months if needed, |

| |and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to services and funding subject to the approval of the |

| |Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing & Contracting to |

| |enter into negotiations with Von Kettler (DBA Advance Database Management); and subject to successful negotiations and |

| |determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract for maintenance and support services for various ARCC database |

| |applications. The contract period will be for one (1) year, July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2008, and two (2) one-year option periods |

| |through June 30, 2010 and an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to services |

| |and funding subject to the approval of the Assessor/ Recorder/County Clerk. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy |

| |A-87. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing & Contracting to |

| |enter into negotiations with Viking Software Solutions; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price, award a contract for upgrade services of proprietary data entry software. The contract period will be for |

| |three (3) years beginning July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010, and an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract |

| |as needed to reflect changes to services and funding subject to the approval of the Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk. Waive the |

| |advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations of $808,870 in the Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk for maintenance and support of the Recorder’s imaging |

| |system based on revenue from the Recorder’s Modernization Trust Fund. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|13. |SUBJECT: |AUTHORIZE ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK TO ENTER INTO STANDARD VENDOR AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF |

| | |ANNUAL IMAGE SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On September 15, 1998, the Board of Supervisors approved the Assessor/Recorder/ |

| |County Clerk’s (ARCC’s) establishment of an annual subscription service to provide non-presorted images of all recorded documents|

| |to contracting companies electronically over T1 lines. In order to effectively provide this service in an efficient manner to |

| |subscribers and under terms agreeable to the Recorder, a standard terms and conditions agreement is used with vendors that |

| |purchase the subscription (see attachment). The Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk requests standing authority to enter into this |

| |agreement with all future subscribers of this service. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |This request will result in no additional costs/revenue and will not require additional staff. Funds for this service are |

| |included in the Fiscal Year 2007-08 Operational Plan. If new subscribers are added, additional fees for services will be |

| |recovered on a prorated basis in accordance with the ARCC’s Fee Resolution of March 22, 2005 (#23). |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK |

| |Authorize the Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk to enter into the standard vendor agreement for the purchase of ARCC‘s annual |

| |subscription service for images of non-sorted recorded documents. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|14. |SUBJECT: |COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION FOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION/ DEFINED CONTRIBUTION SERVICES NEGOTIATION/AWARD OF |

| | |CONTRACT (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County Treasurer-Tax Collector serves as the Plan Administrator for the County of San Diego Deferred Compensation Program |

| |which includes a 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and a 401(a) Incentive Retirement Deferred Compensation Plan. This item requests|

| |that your Board authorize the Director of the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to issue a Competitive Solicitation for |

| |Deferred Compensation/Defined Contribution services and award a contract for those services. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |If approved, this request will result in no annual costs and will require the addition of zero staff years. |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |This proposal will not have significant impact on the local business community. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR |

| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director of the Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting to issue a Competitive Solicitation for Deferred Compensation/Defined Contribution services, and upon |

| |successful negotiation and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract(s) with the ability to amend the |

| |contract(s) as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to approval of the Treasurer-Tax Collector. |

| |ACTION: |

| |Revising the recommendation to make the Board of Supervisors the Source Selection Authority, ON MOTION of Supervisor |

| |Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts |

| |NOES: Horn |

| |

| |

|15. |SUBJECT: |ADOPTION OF FINAL FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 BUDGET FOR THE COUNTY SERVICE AREAS, MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS, AND |

| | |PERMANENT ROAD DIVISIONS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Pursuant to California Government Code Section 29088, this request proposes the adoption of the final budget for the County |

| |Service Areas, Maintenance Districts, and Permanent Road Divisions. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The recommended action provides spending authority of $13,031,990 for the Service Areas, $3,232,059 for the Maintenance |

| |Districts, and $6,899,051 for the Permanent Road Divisions for Fiscal Year 2007-08. In addition, the recommendation approves |

| |reserve designation increases of $742,542 in various Districts for FY 2007-08. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve a resolution adopting the final budget and funding for Fiscal Year 2007-08 for the County Service Areas, Maintenance |

| |Districts, and Permanent Road Divisions. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution |

| |No. 07-161 entitled: ADOPTION OF THE FINAL BUDGET FOR CERTAIN MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS, COUNTY SERVICE AREAS, PERMANENT ROAD |

| |DIVISIONS, AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2007. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|16. |SUBJECT: |COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 FINAL BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR FAMILY OF FUNDS, ENTERPRISE FUNDS |

| | |AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, PRIOR YEAR ENCUMBRANCES, FLEET SERVICES TRANSFER AND PENALTY ASSESSMENT |

| | |RESOLUTION (DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 19, 2007 (12), your Board approved the Operational Plan for Fiscal Years 2007-08 and 2008-09. Pursuant to California |

| |Government Section 29088, a resolution is submitted for formal adoption of the final budgets and funding for Fiscal Year |

| |2007-08 for the County Family of Funds, Enterprise Funds and Internal Service Funds. |

| | |

| |Also requested is authority to carry forward prior year encumbrances and related funding, transfer appropriations to the |

| |Department of General Services Fleet Internal Service Fund (ISF) for the purchase of vehicles and approval of a second resolution|

| |to allocate penalty assessment revenues for Fiscal Year 2007-08. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Recommendation 1 provides spending authority of $4,225,743,072 for the County Family of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007-08 and |

| |approves the reclassification of a fund balance designation of $55,500,000 in the General Fund to a General Reserve. |

| |Recommendation 1 also provides spending authority of $29,441,532 for the Enterprise Funds and $333,497,144 for the Internal |

| |Service Funds. Recommendation 2 authorizes the Auditor to carryover appropriations and any related revenues for prior year |

| |encumbrances. Recommendations 3 and 4 transfer $257,000 in appropriations and amend the spending plan for the General Services |

| |Fleet ISF for the purchase of vehicles. Recommendation 5 allocates Penalty Assessment Revenue to two funds: the County Emergency|

| |Medical Services Fund $3,264,686 and the County Justice Facilities Construction Fund $10,092,672. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve a resolution adopting the final budget for the County Family of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007-08 and the Spending Plans for |

| |Fiscal Year 2007-08 for the Enterprise and Internal Service Funds. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Auditor and Controller to carry forward appropriations and applicable estimated revenue for prior year encumbrances|

| |in all County funds. |

| | |

| |Transfer appropriations of $169,000 from the Alternate Public Defender and $88,000 from Agriculture Weights and Measure to the |

| |General Fund Contributions to Fleet ISF for the Department of General Services Fleet Services ISF to purchase various vehicles. |

| | |

| |Amend the Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Fleet Services ISF Spending Plan in the amount of $257,000 to provide funding for the purchase of|

| |various vehicles for the Alternate Public Defender and Agriculture Weights and Measure. |

| | |

| |Approve a resolution adopting the allocation of penalty assessment revenues expected to be received in Fiscal Year 2007-08. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution |

| |No. 07-162 entitled: ADOPTION OF THE FINAL BUDGET FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO INCLUDING THE COUNTY LIBRARY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR |

| |COMMENCING JULY 1, 2007, and Resolution No 07-163 entitled: RESOLUTION FOR ALLOCATION OF ADDITIONAL PENALTIES AUTHORIZED BY |

| |GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 76000. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|17. |SUBJECT: |FIXING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND SPECIAL DISTRICT TAX RATES AND LEVYING TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007/08 |

| | |(DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to set the annual tax rates for voter-approved debt for all taxing agencies in the County of San Diego and the |

| |1% full value countywide tax rate. |

| | |

| |The Board, pursuant to Government Code Section 29100, is to fix the rates of taxes on the Secured Property Tax Roll. Government |

| |Code Section 29101 requires that as an integral part of fixing the tax rates, the Board shall levy the taxes upon the taxable |

| |property of the County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |This action will provide tax rates for the agencies to produce property tax revenue to satisfy legally incurred debt |

| |requirements. |

| | |

| |The attached property tax rates are essential to the provision of a considerable portion of the revenue required in the operation|

| |of the County and other local governmental agencies for the Fiscal Year 2007/08. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt the final form of resolution incorporating the various rates as computed by the Auditor and Controller for Fiscal Year |

| |2007/08. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution |

| |No. 07-164 entitled: RESOLUTION REGARDING THE FIXING AND LEVYING OF THE TAX RATES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2007. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

|18. |SUBJECT: |RESPONSE TO 2006-2007 GRAND JURY REPORTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Between May 7 and May 30, 2007, the 2006-2007 San Diego County Grand Jury issued seven reports that examine the operation of |

| |various County programs and departments. According to the California Penal Code, the Board of Supervisors must respond to all |

| |Grand Jury report recommendations that are addressed to the County within 90 days of a report’s release. |

| |This a request for your Board to review draft responses prepared by the Chief Administrative Officer that respond to the findings|

| |and recommendations contained in these seven reports and to authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to transmit your Board’s |

| |responses to the Grand Jury, via the Superior Court Presiding Judge. The draft responses address the following seven reports, |

| |the titles of which are: |

| | |

| |’A’ Grades in San Diego County Restaurants, Deserved or Not? |

| |School Diesel Bus Emissions, You Take My Breath Away |

| |San Diego County Employees Retirement Association – The Quest for ‘Alpha’ |

| |Medical Credentials of Inmate Health Care Providers |

| |San Diego County Elder Care Program, Golden Years in Crisis |

| |Conditions and Management of Detention Facilities in San Diego County |

| |Replace Las Colinas Now!! |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There is no fiscal impact with this action. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve the proposed responses and authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to transmit the responses to the Grand Jury via the|

| |Superior Court Presiding Judge. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|19. |SUBJECT: |COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO’S WORK SAFE/STAY HEALTHY PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Like all other California employers, the County of San Diego had experienced ongoing annual increases in its worker’s |

| |compensation costs. Prior to 2003, the County was experiencing an increase of $2.1 million or 12.3% each fiscal year. The Work |

| |Safe/Stay Healthy program was implemented in August 2003 to encourage all County employees to work safely, and thereby reduce the|

| |incidents of injury and their associated costs. This program has been successful in its efforts through its ability to provide |

| |leadership and sustained involvement by employees, educate and train on a continuous basis, and identify and mitigate workplace |

| |hazards. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Receive the presentation on the County of San Diego’s Work Safe/Stay Healthy program for County employees. |

| |ACTION: |

| |Received presentation. |

| |

| |

|20. |SUBJECT: |OUT-OF-COUNTY AND IN-COUNTY BUSINESS TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This letter seeks to update business travel reimbursements by eliminating the current singular travel per diem maximums for |

| |lodging, meals and incidentals and adopting U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) multi-location per diem rates as the |

| |standard for business travel reimbursement (domestic and foreign). It also proposes to align Administrative Code verbiage with |

| |previously approved procedural changes to Board Policy D-7, “Out-of-County/In-County Business and Related Guidelines and |

| |Processes” and makes administrative clarifications to noted Administrative Code sections. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |None. The Administrative Code currently allows business travel costs that exceed the maximums specified in the Code to be |

| |reimbursed upon written justification. Aligning the County’s per diem rates to those of the U.S. General Services Administration |

| |will reduce the instances of unusual costs and therefore the associated administrative tasks. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve the introduction of the Ordinance, (first reading), read title and waive further reading of ordinance, entitled: |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 470, 471, 472, 473.1, AND 476, OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ALL RELATING TO |

| |OUT-OF-COUNTY AND IN-COUNTY BUSINESS TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT. |

| | |

| |Submit ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption (second reading) September 18, 2007. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, introducing Ordinance|

| |for further Board consideration and adoption on September 18, 2007. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|21. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Community Projects Funding assists non-profit organizations in providing essential services to citizens of San Diego County. |

| |Reinvesting taxpayer money in these worthwhile organizations is a benefit to the children and all the communities of North |

| |County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR HORN |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Emilio Nares Foundation for costs associated with the “Harvest |

| |for Hope” event. |

| | |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Palomar Mountain Volunteer Fire Department to purchase 43 |

| |buckets and 43 applicators of fire-resistant gel for the “Fire Barricade” project. |

| | |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Life Perspectives for costs associated with its “Premiere & |

| |Benefit” annual fundraising gala. |

| | |

| |Allocate $50,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to North County Serenity House to purchase bed frames, mattresses, |

| |sofas, and other furnishings for “Serenity Village” in Escondido. |

| | |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Pregnancy Resource Center for costs associated with the “10th |

| |Annual Fundraising Dinner and Silent Auction” event. |

| | |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Vista Community Clinic for costs associated with the “21st Annual |

| |Holiday Homes Tour” event. |

| | |

| |Allocate $4,950.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to San Diego North Economic Development Council for publishing and |

| |printing costs associated with producing the “San Diego North Economic Outlook: Vision 2020” publication. |

| | |

| |Allocate $4,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) the Rancho Santa Fe Guild to purchase and install an air-conditioning |

| |unit for the Library’s community meeting room. |

| | |

| |Allocate $34,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Teri, Inc. for their new Volunteer Training Program. |

| | |

| |Allocate $2,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Valley Center Art Association for two $500 art scholarship |

| |awards, event costs associated with the annual Art and Musical Festival in Valley Center, and supplies for several art shows at |

| |the Valley Center Library. |

| | |

| |Rescind the $10,000.00 grant awarded to the Fallbrook Sheriff’s Senior Volunteer Patrol on May 15th, 2007 and reallocate the |

| |$10,000.00 to the Fallbrook Chamber of Commerce for costs associated with participating and hosting community events in |

| |conjunction with the Fallbrook Sheriff’s Senior Volunteer Patrol. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute a grant agreement with the organizations listed above, establishing terms for |

| |receipt of the funds described above and to make minor amendments to the agreement that are consistent with the general purpose |

| |of the grant but do not increase the grant. |

| | |

| |Find that these grant awards have a public purpose. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|22. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 4) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County’s fiscal condition has enabled it to reinvest taxpayer money in our communities for the benefit of the public. The |

| |recommended action proposes that these projects of great benefit to San Diego County be funded using Community Projects Funds. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The total combined cost of the proposed recommendations is $81,892.48. Appropriations are available in the Community Projects |

| |Budget (15665). This action will result in the addition of no staff years and no future costs. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHAIRMAN ROBERTS |

| |Allocate $1,075.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the Coalition of Neighborhood Councils for tree trimming, tree |

| |planting, sprinkler maintenance and clean-up services in an effort to beautify the corner of Mallard Street and Federal |

| |Boulevard. |

| | |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the Community Health Improvement Partners (CHIP) for printing |

| |costs and rental of audio/visual equipment for the childhood obesity summit. |

| | |

| |Allocate $1,897.48 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the Citizen Diplomacy Council of San Diego to purchase a |

| |computer back-up system. |

| | |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the College Area Economic Development Corporation to purchase |

| |and plant trees along El Cajon Boulevard and College Avenue. |

| | |

| |Allocate $7,920.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the Redwood Village Community Council to purchase graffiti |

| |removal supplies, community signs and an entry way monument. |

| | |

| |Allocate $3,000.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the Diversionary Theatre to purchase new lighting equipment for |

| |the theater located in University Heights. |

| | |

| |Allocate $5,000.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to Goodwill Industries of San Diego County to purchase a litter |

| |vacuum and environmentally green cleaning products. |

| | |

| |Allocate $7,500.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the Hillcrest History Guild to purchase Hillcrest community |

| |banners. |

| | |

| | |

| | |

| |Allocate $2,500.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the Walter J. Porter Educational and Community Foundation for |

| |costs associated with marketing and advertising Imperialfest, which will be held on August 4, 2007. |

| | |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the Mabuhay Alliance to purchase equipment and furniture for |

| |their office located at 9630 Black Mountain Road, Suite G. |

| | |

| |Allocate $6,000.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the Make-A-Wish Foundation of San Diego for a feasibility study |

| |to determine the possibility of having a viable capital campaign to raise funds for a programmatic headquarters and to purchase a|

| |new computer. |

| | |

| |Allocate $5,000.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to the American Lung Association of California to design, print and|

| |mail the 2007 Asthma Report Card. |

| | |

| |Allocate $12,000.00 from the Community Projects budget (15665) to Stepping Stone of San Diego to purchase furniture and printing |

| |equipment for their headquarters located at 3969 4th Avenue, Suite 201 and a security system for their office located at 3767 |

| |Central Avenue. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute a grant agreement with the organizations listed above establishing the terms for|

| |receipt of the funds described above and to make minor amendments to the agreements that are consistent with the general purpose |

| |of the grant but do not increase the grant. |

| | |

| |Find that the grants described above have a public purpose. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|23. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS (DISTRICT: 1) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County of San Diego is fortunate to have an opportunity to reinvest taxpayer money into our communities for the benefit of |

| |the public. This action will assist the County in meeting the needs of individuals and families. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The fiscal impact of the proposed recommendation is $20,000. This action will result in the addition of no staff years and no |

| |future costs. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |VICE-CHAIRMAN COX |

| |Allocate $20,000 from Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to Mainly Mozart for costs associated with relocating the music |

| |festival to the Balboa Theatre, such as festival brochures, banners, programs, signs, office supplies and other costs. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute a grant agreement with the organization listed above establishing the terms for |

| |receipt of the funds described above and to make minor amendments to the agreements that are consistent with the general purpose |

| |of the grant but do not increase the grant. |

| | |

| |Find that the grant award described above has a public purpose. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|24. |SUBJECT: |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED (DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Board Policy A-72, Board of Supervisors Agenda and Related Process, authorizes the Clerk of the Board to prepare a Communications|

| |Received for Board of Supervisors' Official Records. Routine informational reports, which need to be brought to the attention of|

| |the Board of Supervisors yet not requiring action, are listed on this document. Communications Received documents are on file in|

| |the Office of the Clerk of the Board. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Not Applicable. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |

| |Note and file. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|25. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |APPOINTMENTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |These appointments are in accordance with applicable Board Policy A–74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions and |

| |Committees and Board Policy I–1, Planning and Sponsor Group Policies and Procedures. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHAIRMAN ROBERTS |

| |Waive Board Policy A – 74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions, and Committees, and re-appoint Edward Gabrielson |

| |for an additional term on the Air Pollution Control District Hearing Board, for a term to expire September 25, 2009. |

| |Re-appoint James Dodd to the San Diego County Fish and Wildlife Advisory Commission, for a term to expire January 3, 2011. |

| |Waive Board Policy A – 74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions, and Committees, and re-appoint D’Erdra Smothers |

| |for an additional term on the San Diego County Fish and Wildlife Advisory Commission, for a term to expire January 3, 2011. |

| |Waive Board Policy A – 74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions, and Committees, and re-appoint Roger Utt for an |

| |additional term on the San Diego County Parks Advisory Committee, for a term to expire January 3, 2011. |

| |Re-appoint John P. Arnold to the Board of Retirement, for a term to expire |

| |June 30, 2009. |

| | |

| |SUPERVISOR JACOB |

| |Appoint Charles Vernon Smith Sr. to Seat No. 14 on the Crest-Dehesa-Granite Hills-Harbison Canyon Community Planning Group, for a|

| |term to expire January 3, 2011. |

| | |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Re-appoint Louis M. Wolfsheimer to the Citizens’ Law Enforcement Review Board, for a full term to expire June 30, 2010. |

| |Appoint Sheryl Bennett to the Citizens’ Law Enforcement Review Board, for a full term to expire June 30, 2010. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | | |

| | | |

|26. |SUBJECT: |APPROVAL OF STATEMENT OF MUTUALLY SHARED PRINCIPLES BETWEEN SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND THE YUZHONG DISTRICT, |

| | |CHONGQING MUNICIPALITY OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (DISTRICT: 4) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Over the past few years, Chairman Roberts has represented the County of San Diego in meetings with officials from the Yuzhong |

| |District, Chongqing Municipality of the People’s Republic of China. These meetings, which have taken place in both San Diego and|

| |Chongqing, have been very positive with both parties pledging to work together to promote a better understanding and greater |

| |cooperation between these two regions. This is a request for the Board of Supervisors to approve a Statement of Mutually Shared |

| |Principles. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There is no fiscal impact associated with this recommendation. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHAIRMAN ROBERTS |

| |Approve the Statement of Mutually Shared Principles, which intends to promote friendship and exchange activities between San |

| |Diego County and the Yuzhong District, Chongqing Municipality of the People’s Republic of China. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board withdrew the item, on Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | | |

| | | |

|27. |SUBJECT: |SUPPORT FOR SB 10 (KEHOE): SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY REFORM ACT OF 2007 (DISTRICT: 4) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Support for SB 10 (Kehoe): San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Reform Act of 2007 (District: 4) |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHAIRMAN ROBERTS AND VICE CHAIRMAN COX |

| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to authorize the County’s legislative representatives to convey the County’s support for |

| |SB 10 (Kehoe): San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Reform Act of 2007. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | | |

| | | |

|28. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS GRANTS (DISTRICT: 3) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Funding for the Community Projects Grant program was included in the fiscal year 2007-2008 adopted budget in order to further |

| |public purposes throughout the County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The current year total combined cost of these 2 projects is $7,500. The funding source is the Community Projects Budget (org |

| |0263). This will result in the addition of no staff years and no future year costs. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR SLATER-PRICE |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Community Health Improvement Partners (CHIP) for |

| |printing costs and rental of audio/visual equipment for the childhood obesity summit. |

| | |

| |Allocate $2,500 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to The Make a Wish Foundation to be used to grant the wishes |

| |of children with life threatening medical conditions. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with these organizations establishing terms for receipt of the |

| |funds described above and to make minor amendments to the agreements that are consistent with the general purpose of the grant |

| |but do not increase the grant. |

| | |

| |Find that all grant awards described above have a public purpose. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | | |

| | | |

|29. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE (District: All)|

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On July 24, 2007 (20), the Board of Supervisors introduced Ordinance for further Board Consideration and adoption on July 31, |

| |2007. |

| | |

| |The proposed amendments to the San Diego County Compensation Ordinance are part of the ongoing effort to manage and maintain a |

| |skilled and competent workforce dedicated to sustaining operational excellence and serving the public. These amendments include:|

| |establishing and renaming classifications to reflect organizational changes, adjusting salaries in selected classifications to be|

| |competitive to attract qualified candidates, and amending sections of the Compensation Ordinance. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| | |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance |

| |No. 9876 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS AND |

| |COMPENSATION. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| | | |

|30. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: REQUEST TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 363 OF |

| | |THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO PROBATION DEPARTMENT FEES AND CHARGES (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On July 24, 2007 (2), the Board of Supervisors introduced Ordinance for further Board Consideration and adoption on July 31, |

| |2007. |

| |This is a request to adopt an Ordinance amending Section 363 of the County Administrative Code relating to fees and charges |

| |imposed by the County’s Probation Department. The amendments will update and correct various references, adjust certain fees to |

| |reflect current costs and add a retroactive provision relating to polygraph testing fees. Penal Code section 1203.1b provides |

| |authority to the Probation Department to impose fees for reasonable costs of probation services, investigation and supervision, |

| |including, but not limited to, fees for polygraph testing. Polygraph testing has proven effective in monitoring convicted sex |

| |offenders and ensuring their compliance with conditions of probation. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| | |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 363 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO PROBATION DEPARTMENT FEES AND CHARGES |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance |

| |No. 9877 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 363 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE |

| |ESTABLISHMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF PROBATION FEES AND CHARGES. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|31. |SUBJECT: |CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Cases – 1) |

| | |

| |B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Cases – 1) |

| | |

| |C. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION |

| |(Government Code section 54957) |

| |Title: County Counsel |

| | |

| |D. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION |

| |(Government Code section 54957) |

| |Title: Chief Administrative Officer |

| |ACTION: |

| |Any other reportable matters will be announced on Wednesday, August 1, 2007, prior to the Board of Supervisors Planning and Land |

| |Use meeting. |

| |

|32. |SUBJECT: |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Chairman Ron Roberts presented a proclamation declaring today, Parks and Recreation Month throughout the County of San Diego. |

| |Vice Chairman Greg Cox presented a proclamation declaring today, Anne Campbell Day throughout the County of San Diego. |

| |Supervisor Dianne Jacob presented a proclamation honoring the Volunteer of the Month, Ann Evans. |

| |Greg Smith presented a check to Jean Shepard for The Polinsky Children’s Center. |

| |

|33. |SUBJECT: |PUBLIC COMMUNICATION |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |John Van Doorn spoke to the Board concerning Child Protective Services. |

| |ACTION: |

| |Heard, referred to the Chief Administrative Officer. |

| | | |

There being no further business, the Board adjourned at 12:00 p.m. in memory of Rose Rothe, Victor Kops, Petty Officer David Busby II, and Army Staff Sergeant Joshua P. Mattero.

THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

County of San Diego, State of California

Consent: Vizcarra

Discussion: Hall

NOTE: This Statement of Proceedings sets forth all actions taken by the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download