Chapter 7: Test Bank - Weebly



Chapter 7: Police and the Constitution – Worksheet 2

TRUE/FALSE

1. Police can make a warrantless search if the subject of the search voluntarily consents.

T F REF: 230 OBJ: 6

2. Coolidge v. New Hampshire first enunciated the automobile exception to the search warrant requirement.

T F REF: 231-232 OBJ: 6

3. The plain view doctrine allows clearly visible evidence to be seized at any time.

T F REF: 234 OBJ: 7

4. Under Miranda, a lawyer will be offered to a suspect if the suspect is indigent and therefore cannot afford one.

T F REF: 237 OBJ: 8

5. The Fifth Amendment guarantees protection against self-incrimination.

T F REF: 237 OBJ: 8

6. Miranda warnings must be administered during stop and frisks even though no arrest has been made.

T F REF: 239-240 OBJ: 9

7. Once a suspect invokes his or her Miranda warning, officers have twenty-four hours to complete the interrogation the suspect’s lawyer must be summoned.

T F REF: 240 OBJ: 9

8. Suspects are not entitled to legal counsel during showups and photo arrays.

T F REF: 244 OBJ: 10

MULTIPLE CHOICE

1. Where an arrest was based on probable cause, a search incident to this arrest is allowable provided by the Supreme Court in

|a. |Katz v. United States (1967). |

|b. |Carroll v. United States (1925). |

|c. |Chimel v. California (1969). |

|d. |United States v. Robinson (1973). |

REF: 229-230 OBJ: 6

2. The U.S. Supreme Court set the standard for consent searches in

|a. |Katz v. United States (1967). |

|b. |Carroll v. United States (1925). |

|c. |Chimel v. California (1969). |

|d. |Schneckcloth v. Bustamonte (1973). |

REF: 230 OBJ: 6

3. The U.S. Supreme Court limited the scope of search incidental to arrest to the area within the suspect’s “immediate control” in

|a. |Katz v. United States (1967). |

|b. |Carroll v. United States (1925). |

|c. |Chimel v. California (1969). |

|d. |Schneckcloth v. Bustamonte (1973). |

REF: 230 OBJ: 6

4. Which of the following is not true for consent searches?

|a. |Consent must be voluntary |

|b. |Consent has to be given by an authorized party |

|c. |The party giving consent must be advised they have the right to refuse |

|d. |Officers are not required to have probable cause to ask for consent to search |

REF: 230-231 OBJ: 6

5. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that law distinguishes among automobiles, homes, and persons in questions involving police searches in

|a. |Katz v. United States (1967). |

|b. |Carroll v. United States (1925). |

|c. |Chimel v. California (1969). |

|d. |Schneckcloth v. Bustamonte (1973). |

REF: 231-232 OBJ: 6

6. In _______________ the Supreme Court ruled that the “true motivation” of police officers in making traffic stops is irrelevant as long as they had probable cause to believe a traffic law had been broken.

|a. |Florida v. Bostick |

|b. |Katz v. United States |

|c. |Whren v United States |

|d. |Arizona v. Gant |

REF: 232 OBJ: 6

7. The plain view doctrine was first enunciated by the Supreme Court in __________________.

|a. |Coolidge v. New Hampshire. |

|b. |Burger v. New York. |

|c. |Carroll v. United States. |

|d. |Whren v. United States. |

REF: 234 OBJ: 7

8. Which of the following is not a criterion of a valid plain view seizure?

|a. |The item must be discovered inadvertently |

|b. |Additional investigation or testing must confirm the illegal nature of the item. |

|c. |The officer must be legally in a position to notice the item. |

|d. |The position of the item must lead to easy detection by an officer’s sight or some other sense. |

REF: 234 OBJ: 7

9. Protecting a person from self-incrimination is provided under the

|a. |4th Amendment. |

|b. |5th Amendment. |

|c. |6th Amendment. |

|d. |7th Amendment. |

REF: 237 OBJ: 8

10. Miranda is required when

|a. |a suspect is being arrested. |

|b. |a suspect is being questioned. |

|c. |a suspect is being booked. |

|d. |a suspect is in custody and being questioned. |

REF: 238 OBJ: 8

11. When police attempt to create a non-threatening environment in order to encourage a suspect to waive his or her Miranda rights, it is called

|a. |conditioning. |

|b. |deemphasizing. |

|c. |intimidation. |

|d. |persuasion. |

REF: 241 OBJ: 9

12. Which of the following is not a strategy used by police officers to obtain voluntary Miranda waivers from suspects?

|a. |Intimidation |

|b. |Conditioning |

|c. |Persuasion |

|d. |Deemphasizing |

REF: 241 OBJ: 9

13. Witnesses may be shown mug-shots of possible suspects during

|a. |showups. |

|b. |photo arrays. |

|c. |lineups. |

|d. |booking. |

REF: 244 OBJ: 10

14. In what identification procedure are suspects entitled to legal representation?

|a. |showups |

|b. |photo arrays |

|c. |lineups. |

|d. |booking. |

REF: 244 OBJ: 10

COMPLETION

1. Before going before a judge to ask for a warrant, a police officer must prepare a(n) ________________ in which he or she provides specific, written information on the property they wish to search.

REF: 228 OBJ: 5

2. The search of a person and the immediate vicinity surrounding that person pursuant to a lawful arrest is called a search to arrest.

REF: 229-230 OBJ: 6

3. The limits for searches incidental to arrest were established in the case .

REF: 230 OBJ: 6

4. In Coolidge V. New Hampshire the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a warrantless seizure may be made under the doctrine if specific criteria are met.

REF: 234 OBJ: 7

5. Direct questioning of a suspect to gather evidence of criminal activity and to try to gain a confession is .

REF: 237 OBJ: 8

6. A suspect must be read his or her Miranda rights before a ____________ begins.

REF: 238 OBJ: 9

7. A occurs when either the suspect or the witness are returned to the crime scene for possible identification.

REF: 244 OBJ: 10

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download