E-Publisher or Third-Party Vendor Course Content (to be ...



To obtain online faculty mentor approval, all course components on this form must be completeCourse Information (to be completed by Course Developer)Course ID and Title:Course Developer Name:Delivery Semester:I have worked with an MTSU Online instructional designer to develop or redesign this coursePeer Review Summary (to be completed by OFM) Is this course recommended for delivery?YesYes – Minor modifications recommended (additional review NOT required)Yes – Minor modifications recommended (additional review IS required)No – Major modifications and/or clarification recommended (additional review IS required)E-Publisher or Third-Party Vendor Course Content (to be completed by OFM if applicable)If students are required to review or complete work in a third-party site (Connect, Pearson, McGraw Hill), please provide the following information:Is the course designer using third-party content?YesNoNIs the content integrated into D2L?YesNoN/AWere you provided access in order to review the content?YesNoN/AOFM CommentsOFM Signature:Date:Instructions for Course DeveloperThe “Course Developer Evaluation” column describes the components to be developed and posted within D2L in order for the course to be recommended for approval by the OFM. Under each topic, mark each item as complete where appropriate. Use the “Course Developer Comments” column to elaborate on course information for any item you feel needs further explanation.If students are required to review or complete work located in a third-party vendor or e-publisher website, please provide access instructions for your OFM in order for the peer review to be completed.Email the completed Self Evaluation Form to your assigned OFM, who will then conduct the peer review. The OFM will return their evaluation with comments and recommendations. Please contact your OFM if you have questions regarding the self-evaluation form or process.Course Content and StructureCourse Home PageCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsInstructor nameInstructor contact informationInstructions to begin courseAnnouncements or newsLink to course syllabusHas the student been welcomed to class?Getting Started/Welcome/Course Introduction ModuleCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsCourse descriptionDirections for beginning courseInstructor informationDirections for finding and using Brightspace Pulse appInstructions for using D2L toolsLinks to resources or software necessary to complete course requirements are providedLinks to campus policiesLinks to resources for accessibility and technical supportLinks to tutoring and other student success resourcesCourse Content StructureCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsContent is divided into modules of related materialsStudent learning objectives are included for each moduleMaterials needed to complete modules are includedCourse Content PresentationCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsContent is presented multiple ways, including:TextVideos/You Tube/Ted TalksPresentationsAudioChartsPicturesOther (please explain)SyllabusCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsMTSU accessible syllabus template is usedCourse objectives are includedLearning Activities and AssignmentsCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsInstructions for completing learning activitiesDiscussion activities linked in modulesQuiz activities linked in modulesDropbox activities linked in modulesCopyrightCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsPermission obtained for materials outside fair useCourse Design and NavigationCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsDesign is consistent in appearance and organizationCourse is easy to navigateConsistent terminology is used across content, learning activities, assessments, and gradebookCourse content is grammatically correctCourse files reside in D2LStudent EngagementCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsExpectations for interaction are clearly statedMultiple opportunities exist for interaction, communication, and collaboration, including:Introduction activityDiscussion forumsEmailVirtual office hoursOther (please explain)Assessment and EvaluationAssessment StrategiesCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsMultiple assessment strategies exist to measure content knowledge and skills. For example: QuizzesExamsDiscussionsWriting assignmentsOther (please explain)GradebookCourse Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsGradebook is established in D2L and connected to all learning assessmentsAccessibility (for developers who have not worked with an instructional designer)Course Developer EvaluationCourse Developer CommentsAre course materials accessible? For example:Written information uses a heading structureText is limited to two or three colorsColors provide adequate contrastMoving or blinking text is not usedHyperlinked text uses informative titles (no links titled “click here”Images and non-text items include alt-tagsText, graphics, and images are understood without colorRubric adapted from: Rubric for Online Instruction - California State University, Chico (Copyright 2003; Revised 2009)Work done by the MTSU Online Course Evaluation CommitteeTN eCampus Course RequirementsSREB Criteria for Evaluation of Online CoursesRevised:03.21.201303.13.201502.24.201610.31.201611.08.201701.26.201804.26.201803.17.2020 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download