University of Colorado-Boulder
University of Colorado-Boulder
Leeds School of Business
ESBM 4570 Sanjai Bhagat
Entrepreneurial Finance Office: KOBL S431
Fall 2012 Office Hours: W (1 pm – 3 pm)
M 3:30 pm – 6:15 pm, KOBL 210 sanjai.bhagat@colorado.edu, Tel. 303-492-7821
I. Course Objective
The objective of the course is to provide the student with a state-of-the-art understanding of
• valuation of small and mid-cap public and private firms, and
• the economics of contracts as it applies to entrepreneurship and new venture finance.
The course will cover the following topics: finance and the entrepreneur; project and business valuation; creating value through financial contracting (staging of financing); financing sources (venture capital, other); and exit strategies (initial public offering, other).
II. Course Materials
Course materials consist of Entrepreneurial Finance (Wiley, by J.K. Smith and R.L. Smith, 2003) and Damodaran On Valuation (Second Edition, Wiley, by A. Damodaran, 2006), and scholarly journal articles and working papers.
Lecture notes/overheads and class announcements can be accessed from my home-page:
III. Course Outline and Readings
A. Valuation
1. Free corporate valuation app for the iPad:
2. A. Damodaran, “Valuation Approaches and Metrics,” 2005, Foundations and Trends in Finance.
3. Valuation Chapter 1, Introduction to Valuation.
[ “Books & Support” “Damodaran On Valuation (Second Edition)” “Website for book”]
4. Valuation Chapter 2, Estimating Discount Rates.
5. Valuation Chapter 3, Estimating Cash Flows.
6. Valuation Chapter 4, Estimating Growth and Terminal Value.
7. Valuation Chapter 6, Firm Value DCF Models.
8. Valuation Chapter 9, Firm and Enterprise Value Multiples.
9. Valuation Chapter 12, The Value of Intangibles.
10. Valuation Chapter 14, The Value of Liquidity.
11. Entrepreneurial Finance Chapters 8, 9, 10, New Venture Valuation.
12. S. Bhagat, "Real Options in the Telecommunications Industry," in Real Options: The New
Investment Theory and its Implications for Telecommunications Economics (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. Options Real Options
13. L. Courteau, J.L. Kao and T. O’Keefe, “Gains to Valuation Accuracy of Direct Valuation Over Industry Multiplier Approaches,” 2003, University of Alberta working paper. [ValuationAccuracy.pdf]
14. A. Schreiner and K. Spremann, “Multiples and their Valuation Accuracy,” Yale University working paper, 2007.
15. J. Liu, D. Nissim, and J. Thomas, “Is Cash Flow King in Valuations?” Financial Analysts Journal 63, Number 2, 2007.
16. H.J.Seppanen, “Financial Statement Information and Evaluation of Newly Listed High-Technology “Nano Caps”” Aalto University (Finland) working paper, 2010.
17. S. Sievers and J. Klobucnik, “Valuing High Technology Growth Firms,” Cologne Graduate school paper, 2012.
B. Private Equity
1. S. N. Kaplan and P. Stromberg, “Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity, NBER paper, 2008.
2. Steven J. Davis , John Haltiwanger , Ron S. Jarmin , Josh Lerner and Javier Miranda, “Private Equity and Employment,” US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-08-07R. Private Equity
C. Financial Contracting
1. Entrepreneurial Finance Chapters 11, 12, 13. VC-update siliconvalley
2. S. N. Kaplan and P. Stromberg, "Venture Capitalists as Principals: Contracting, Screening, and Monitoring," 2001, American Economic Review, v91(2,May), 426-430.
ImpliedReturn SampleCapitalizationTable
3. S.N. Kaplan and Per Stromberg. "Financial Contracting Theory Meets The Real World: An Empirical Analysis Of Venture Capital Contracts," Review of Economic Studies, 2003, v70(2,Apr), 281-315.
4. S. N. Kaplan, B. A. Sensoy, and P. Stromberg, “Should Investors Bet on the Jockey or the Horse? Evidence from the Evolution of Firms from Early Business Plans to Public Companies,” Journal of Finance 64, 2009, 75-115.
5. O. Bengtsson and B. A. Sensoy, “Changing the Nexus: The Evolution and Renegotiation of Venture Capital Contracts,” Ohio State University working paper, 2009.
6. O. Bengtsson and B. A. Sensoy, “Investor Abilities and Financial Contracting: Evidence from Venture Capital,” Ohio State University working paper, 2009.
7. O. Bengtsson and S.A.Ravid, “The Geography of Venture Capital Contracts,” Ohio State University working paper, 2009.
8. H. Chen, P. Gompers, A. Kovner, and J. Lerner, “Buy Local? The Geography of Successful Venture Capital Expansion,” Harvard University working paper, 2009.
9. Brian Broughmana and Jesse Fried, “Renegotiation of cash flow rights in the sale of VC-backed firms,” Journal of Financial Economics 95, Issue 3, March 2010, Pages 384-399.
D. Financing Sources
1. Entrepreneurial Finance Chapter 14.
2. S. Bhagat, “Why Do Venture Capitalists Charge Such High Discount rates?” University of Colorado working paper, 2009. venture-discount-rates.doc VentureCapital.ppt
3. R. Nanda and M. Rhodes-Kropf, “Investment Cycles and Startup Innovation,” Harvard University working paper, 2011.
4. Hellmann, Thomas, Laura Lindsey and Manju Puri. “Building Relationships Early: Banks in Venture Capital,” Review of Financial Studies, 2008, v21(2,Mar), 513-541.
5. D. Hsu, “Why Do Entrepreneurs Pay For Venture Capital Affiliation,” Journal of Finance 59, 2004, 1805-1841.
6. Hochberg, Yael V., Alexander Ljungqvist and Yang Lu, “Networking as a Barrier to Entry and the Competitive Supply of Venture Capital,” Journal of Finance, 2010, v65 (June), 829-859.
7. J. Lerner and A. Schoar, “Transaction Structures in the Developing World: Evidence From Private Equity,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005.
8. M. Wright and R. Chopra, “Returns to Venture Capital,” forthcoming, 2010.
9. R. Smith, R. Pedace, and V. Sathe, “Venture Capital: Performance, Persistence, and Reputation,” University of California – Riverside working paper, 2009.
10. N. Dai and V. Ivanov, “Entrepreneurial Optimism, Credit Availability, and Cost of Financing: Evidence from U.S. Small Business,” SEC working paper, 2009.
11. Paul Gompers, Anna Kovnerc, Josh Lernera and David Scharfstein, “Performance persistence in entrepreneurship,” Journal of Financial Economics 96, Issue 1, April 2010, Pages 18-32.
E. Exit Strategies
1. Entrepreneurial Finance Chapter 16.
2. J.R. Ritter, “Equilibrium in the IPO Market,” Annual Review of Financial Economics 3, 2011. IPO.ppt IPO-US-World March2012-SenateHearings-1 March2012-SenateHearings-2
3. A.P Ljungqvist and W. J. Wilhelm, “IPO Pricing in the Dot-Com Bubble,” Journal of Finance 58, 2003, 723-752.
4. R. Aggarwal, S. Bhagat and S. Rangan, “Impact of Fundamentals on IPO Valuation,” Financial Management, 2009, 253-284. IPO Valuation.ppt
5. C. S. Armstrong, A. Davila, G. Foster, and J.R.M. Hand, “Market-to-revenue multiples in public and private markets,” Australian Journal of Management 36, 15-57, 2011.
6. A. Poulsen and M. Stegemoller, “Moving from Private to Public Ownership: Selling Out to Public Firms vs. Initial Public Offerings,” 2005, University of Georgia working paper.
7. F. Degeorge, F. Derrien and K. Womack, “Auctioned IPOs: The U.S. Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics 98, November 2010, 177-194.
8. Hsu, Hung, Adam Reed and Jorg Rocholl, “The New Game in Town: Competitive Effects of IPOs,” Journal of Finance 65, April 2010, 495-528.
9. Ugur Celikyurta, , Merih Sevilirb, 1, and Anil Shivdasani , “Going public to acquire? The acquisition motive in IPOs ,” Journal of Financial Economics 96, Issue 3, June 2010, Pages 345-363.
10. C.F. Foley and R. Greenwood, “Giving Up Control to Pursue Growth: The Evolution of Corporate Ownership After IPO,” 2008, Harvard University working paper.
11. C.W. Smith, Jr., "Investment Banking and the Capital Acquisition Process," Journal of Financial Economics 15, 1986, 3-30. RaisingCapital.ppt
F. Current Topics
1. R. Ball, “The Global Financial Crisis and the Efficient Market Hypothesis: What Have We Learned?” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Volume 21, Issue 4, pages 8–16, Fall 2009.
2. A. Brooks, “Five Myths About Free Enterprise,” Washington Post, July 13, 2012.
3. S. Bhagat, “How to Grow Employment and the Economy,” University of Colorado working paper, 2011. LaborParticipationRates LPROct2012 EuropeanCrisis
4. S. Bhagat and I. Obreja, “Corporate Employment and Cash Flow Uncertainty,” University of Colorado paper, 2012.
5. S. Bhagat and B. Bolton, “Bank Executive Compensation And Capital Requirements Reform” University of Colorado working paper, 2012. IBCompensation
6. Anat R. Admati, Peter M. DeMarzo, Martin F. Hellwig, Paul C. Pfleiderer, “Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts, and Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulation: Why Bank Equity is Not Expensive,” Stanford University working paper, September 2010.
7. Lowrey, Ying, “Estimating Entrepreneurial Jobs: Business Creation is Job Creation”, U.S. Small Business Administration, 2010.
8. Estrin, Saul and Tomek Mickiewicz , Size Matters: Entrepreneurial Entry and Government,” London School of Economics, 2010.
9. Audretsch, David and Taylor Aldridge, “University Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth,”Indiana University, 2010.
10. Kerr, William, Josh Lerner and Antoinette Schoar, “The Consequences of Entrepreneurial Finance: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis,” Harvard University, 2010.
11. Paige Ouimet and Rebecca Zarutskie, “Who Works for Startups? The Relation between Firm Age, Employee Age, and Growth,” Duke University working paper, October 1, 2011.
12. Kauffman Foundation, “Anatomy of an Entrepreneur,” 2009.
13. Jones and L. Bouamane, “Historical Trajectories and Corporate Competencies in Wind Energy,” Harvard University working paper, 2011.
13 P. Morris, W. T. Bogart, A. Dorchak, and R. E. Meiners, “Green Jobs Myths,” University of Illinois working paper, 2009.
14. Lauder Institute – University of Pennsylvania, “Global Risk: New Perspectives and Opportunities,” 2011.
IV. Course Schedule
August 27: Introduction
September 3: Labor Day
September 10: Term Paper Topics
September 17: Valuation Term Paper proposal due.
September 24: Valuation.
October 1: Valuation
October 8: Private Equity.
October 15: Financial Contracting.
October 22: Financial Contracting. Term Paper draft due.
October 29: Financial Contracting CapTable Case
November 5: Venture Financing
November 12: Exit strategies
November 19: Fall Break
November 26: Exit Strategies.
Term Paper due Nov 28, 3:00 pm, in my office
December 3: Student Presentations
December 10: Student Presentations. Review for Final Exam.
Wednesday, Dec. 19, 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM: Final Exam
V. Course Policies
Grading
The grade breakdown is as follows:
Item Weight
A. Class participation and attendance 10%
B. Term Paper (proposal, due: September 17) 5%
C. Term Paper (draft, due: October 22) 15%
D. Term Paper (write-up, due: Nov 28, 3:00 pm, in my office) 20%
E. Term Paper (presentation) 15%
F. Peer evaluation by other team-members 5%
G. Final Exam 30%
A. Class participation is critical to the success of this course. Student questions and comments are expected and welcome. Attendance will be taken at random (unannounced). Students are requested to place their name-cards (to be provided) in front of their desk at all times during class.
The class will be conducted in a professional manner: Students and the instructor are expected to be prepared for each class, and behave professionally in the class.
B. Proposals for the term paper are due on September 17, 2012, before the start of class. The proposal should answer the following two questions:
▪ What will the paper be about?
▪ Why is this topic interesting and important?
You should also include a list of at least four academic papers or book chapters that you intend to read as background for your paper. The proposal should be no more than a page.
C, D, E. The term paper draft is due on October 22, 2012, before the start of class. The term paper draft should be at least ten pages long, and include the following:
▪ What is the paper about?
▪ Why is this interesting and important to study/read?
▪ A critical survey of the literature.
▪ Outline of the original analysis that would be of interest to somebody in the real world: an investment banker, venture capitalist, or entrepreneur.
▪ References that includes at least four academic papers or book chapters.
The term paper is due on Nov 28, 3:00 pm, in my office.
Student presentations are scheduled for December 3 and 10. The paper can be on any topic that will be covered in the course. The paper should include a critical survey of the literature and some original analysis that would be of interest to somebody in the real world: an investment banker, venture capitalist, or entrepreneur. The paper (including exhibits) should be between 20 and 25, double-spaced pages (twelve-point font, one-inch margin all-around).
The paper is a group exercise; students should form/join groups consisting of no less than three students and no more than four students. You should form/join a group on the first day of class. Your group will meet with me on September 10. Please note that the first group assignment (term-paper proposal) is due on September 17, 2012. While you are welcome and encouraged to talk to your friends, work-associates, instructors, etc. regarding ideas, facts, institutional practices, real cases, and so on, the group should write the paper without assistance from anyone outside the group. Similarly, the presentation is also a group exercise. All students in the same group will get the same grade for the term paper proposal, draft, write-up, and presentation.
On your paper please note the following:
On my honor, as a University of Colorado at Boulder student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized assistance on this paper.
A Note on Academic Honesty & Plagiarism: The development of the Internet has provided students with historically unparalleled opportunities for conducting research swiftly and comprehensively. The availability of these materials does not, however, release the student from appropriately citing sources where appropriate; or applying standard rules associated with avoiding plagiarism. Please see
Also, please review ,
,
,
and .
Guidelines for the Term Paper
Suggested order for the sections:
Cover Page
Paper Title, Student Names, Course, Date
Executive Summary
No more than one page. The most important part of your paper! Briefly explain what the paper is about, why this is an interesting and important topic, and your main findings/conclusions. Consider an entrepreneur, investment banker, investor, or venture capitalist as your primary reader of this page.
Introduction
What is the paper about?
Motivation: Why is this interesting and important to study/read?
Overview of the paper.
(Main Body)
Please consider using sub-sections to better organize your paper, and improve its readability.
Please check the transition between paragraphs.
(Footnotes on same page.)
Summary and Conclusions
Exhibits (Tables, Graphs, etc.)
Captions and legends in the exhibits should make them self-explanatory. Cite data sources.
References
____________________________________________________________________
Check for grammar and spelling.
All arguments/assertions should be supported using:
logical constructs, and/or
theoretical considerations (cite references), and/or
previous empirical evidence (cite references).
Paper should be revised by you at least four times over a period no less than a week.
G. The exam will consist of essay-type questions, and will be closed-book, closed-notes, and in-class. The exam will be based on study questions that will be handed out during the semester. The exam will be graded anonymously in the sense that students will not write their names on the exam and at the time I grade the exam I will not know whose exam it is.
Grade distribution:
Readings
You are advised to read the “critical portions” of the assigned readings for a particular class before that class. The critical portions of a reading include the abstract, introduction, summary/conclusions of the paper. You might wish to read the main body of the paper after we have discussed it in class.
Study Questions for ESBM 4570 (November 14, 2012)
1. With the help of a numerical example discuss and explain the underinvestment problem. How could a business avoid this problem? Explain.
2. Describe the various methods of estimating the cost of equity. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the various methods of estimating the cost of equity. [value-1.ppt; slides 46-49, slides 6-7]
3. Describe the stable growth, 2-stage growth, and 3-stage growth models. Discuss when each model is appropriate to use. [value-1.ppt; slides 77-79]
4. Describe and discuss how you would value a company that currently has negative earnings. [value-2.ppt; slides 185-186; example in slides 187-199]
5. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the following valuation techniques: Discounted Cashflow Valuation, Relative Valuation, Real Option Valuation. (Valuation.ppt)
6. Kaplan and Stromberg (2001, 2003) and note that VC contracts have the following features: antidilution rights, automatic conversion, and vesting and non-compete clauses. Describe these contractual features. What is the economic justification for including it in a VC contract? [VC-Contracting.ppt]
7. (a) Bengtsson and Sensoy (2009) note that more experienced VCs are less likely to seek downside protection. What is meant by downside protection in a VC contract? Why do more experienced VCs seek less downside protection?
(b) Why do VCs usually take convertible preferred stock rather than common stock in the companies they invest in?
(c) As a founder in a company you might get angel investment. It is wise to treat angel (and other) investors fairly. How would you ensure the securities the angel investor receives in your company are fairly priced? [VC-Contracting.ppt]
8. Why are initial public offerings underpriced as discussed by Welch and Ritter (2002)? Please be sure to discuss the theories based on asymmetric information (both when the issuer is more informed than the investor, and the investors are more informed than issuer), theories based on symmetric information, and theories focusing on the allocation of IPO shares. [IPO.ppt]
9. (a) Why do venture-capitalists use such high discount rates? [venture-discount-class.doc]
(b) What is the relation between (i) income and an IPO’s value, and (ii) insider ownership and an IPO’s value as discussed by Aggarwal, Bhagat and Rangan (2009). [IPO Valuation.ppt]
10. (a) What are the significant determinants of whether a privately held firm is taken over by a publicly-held firm, versus conducting an IPO as discussed by Poulsen and Stegemoller (2005)?
[IPO.ppt]
11. (a) What are the accounting relationships between revenue, net income, EBIT, and free cash flow to equity? [value1.ppt slide 63]
(b) Valuation professionals use both price/sales and price/earnings ratios to impute value of a company. When might price/sales be more appropriate than price/earnings? [IPO Valuation.ppt]
12. With the help of a schematic diagram, please explain how the U.S. international trade deficit and the U.S. unemployment rate are related. What might be some policy prescriptions to address the above concerns? [Bhagat (2011) “How to Grow Employment and the Economy”]
13. Describe the capital markets' reaction to announcements of new security offerings. Discuss the theories (optimal capital structure, implied changes in net operating cashflow, information asymmetry) that have been suggested to understand this set of empirical facts. [raising-capital.ppt]
_____________________________
Please note: The Final Exam will consist of five questions drawn from the above; some more questions will be added to the above. You will be asked to answer three of these five questions. It is expected that the answer to each question would take about 30 minutes.
[pic]
• Updated March 20, 2012, 10:27 a.m. ET
Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught?
[pic]
I have seen successful executives who left corporations and joined start-ups and were unprepared for the experience. They knew how to manage, but they weren't ready for the uncertainty in almost every aspect of decision-making, informal handshakes in place of formal agreements, raw conflicts among company founders and investors and the need to do everything oneself—from emptying garbage cans to fixing jammed copiers.
Leading a start-up also demands a deep understanding of people that can only come from real-world experience.
Imagine a potential employee who's trying to decide between joining a large company or a tiny start-up. Just looking at the numbers, it would be insane to go with the smaller firm. You would almost certainly make less money, you would take on huge personal risk and emotional burden, and you could even wreck your reputation if the venture failed.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- state of colorado division of banking
- state of colorado department of treasury
- university of colorado online
- colorado boulder financial aid
- university of colorado calendar 2020
- university of colorado campuses
- university of colorado boulder address
- university of colorado boulder athletics
- university of colorado aurora campus
- university of colorado tuition
- university of colorado aurora
- christian university in colorado springs