PEER-REVIEW ARTICLE
The Title of Your Editorial Goes Here with 16-Point Bold Arial Font
First A. Author a
Your abstract, in 10-point Arial font, all indented 0.5 inches, having a maximum length of 200 words (ideally 100 words in the case of an Editorial), goes here. The abstract briefly summarizes your main points, using terms understandable to a general scientific audience. Remember that the journal audience is multidisciplinary. Acronyms are discouraged. Also, due to the higher proportion of readers of abstracts, relative to other parts of an article text, BioResources has opted to use a 10-point, sans-serif font for this item. This example of an abstract is 93 words in length.
Keywords: Format; Author guidelines; TNRoman 10-point italics; Up to 10 brief terms
Contact information: a: Department of Biotechnology, Acme TNRoman 10 Pt. Italics University, P. O. Box 1000, Acme, OH 44308 USA; mailto:faauth3@stateu.edu
Optional Heading(s) – 12PT Bold Arial
Indent all paragraphs. The text should be justified at the right margin, in addition to the left margin. The reason for including an abstract, even in the case of a one- or two-page editorial, is that abstracts also will appear separately in HTML form. Please do not include any special symbols in the abstract.
Subsequent paragraphs are indented also. When writing your editorial, your most important goal is to engage the reader with an interesting point of view. Variety and originality of viewpoints are encouraged. Presentations of contrarian opinions, as well as conventional opinions are encouraged, providing that the emphasis is placed on logical arguments and facts, without regard to personalities or status. Because the purpose of editorials is to provide stimulating reading for the journal’s audience, not to win an argument, the editors will judge each editorial submission independently, not on the basis of a supposed equal-time criterion.
Although it is appropriate to back up your point of view with concrete examples and appreciation of the work of others, you will not be using literature citations. (If your subject matter seems to require the use of literature citations, then please consider writing a Scholarly Review article, which will be subject to peer-review. To prepare such a review you will need to use a different template, the template for Articles.) Note that the present template has no section for citations.
Manuscripts must be prepared and submitted in one of the following editable formats: MS WORD, or RTF (Rich Text Format). The purpose of requiring one of these formats is to facilitate the editing process and minimize the time between submission and publication. For purposes of the review process, the editorial staff will convert drafts to PDF (Portable Document Format) files. In cases where the editors recommend a revised version to be submitted, the revised document, once again, needs to be submitted in one of the two editable text systems listed.
As you may have noticed, the present document has been set up in such a way as to serve as a template for the format of your own research article that you are submitting for publications in BioResources. It is recommended to start with a fresh copy of this template document, rename your copy of it, and then gradually replace the contents with your own contents. The editors request that the file name begin with the primary author’s last name (family name) or at least the first six letters of that name. You don’t need to worry about the material in the Header and the Footer; the editorial staff will take care of those items after an article has been reviewed, any issues raised by the reviewers have been satisfactorily addressed, and the article has been approved for publication. Authors are responsible for formatting all of the pages, including accurate formatting of the title, author list, the abstract (including indentation), key words, main headings (as provided), optional subheadings, text, figures, graphs, and citations. All of these must match the format of the examples shown in this template article.
Editorials should be at least one page in length, but no more than two, following the format given here. Again, if you have a more lengthy “story” to tell, please consider submitting a scholarly review, following the instructions for peer-review articles.
Optional Heading
Though it is possible to write an editorial with no headings, you are encouraged to use them sparingly to indicate your main themes.
Optional Heading
Although there is no peer-review process for editorials, the editors will be selective and publish a limited number of opinion pieces, based on their exclusive judgment. Because opinion pieces often can be improved, the editors may suggest changes. The editors also may decide that a certain opinion piece should be delayed so that it can be placed at the beginning of a future issue.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- peer review of teaching form
- free peer reviewed article database
- ebsco peer review journals
- scholarly peer reviewed article database
- free scholarly peer reviewed article database
- peer review examples for coworkers
- free peer review articles psychology
- peer review articles on psychology
- peer reviewed article sites
- peer review journal database
- cellular respiration peer review article
- peer reviewed article effective leadership