Correlation Coefficient Critical Values for 0.05 and 0.01 ...
[Pages:1]Correlation Coefficient Critical Values for 0.05 and 0.01 Significance Levels
Sample Size n 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
0.05 Critical Value
0.950 0.878 0.811 0.754 0.707 0.666 0.632 0.602 0.576 0.553 0.532 0.514 0.497 0.482 0.468 0.456 0.444
0.01 Critical Value
0.990 0.959 0.917 0.875 0.834 0.798 0.765 0.735 0.708 0.684 0.661 0.641 0.623 0.606
0.590 0.575 0.561
Sample Size n 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80
0.05 Critical Value
0.433 0.423 0.413 0.404 0.396 0.388 0.381 0.374 0.367 0.361 0.335 0.312 0.294 0.279 0.254 0.236 0.220
0.01 Critical Value
0.549 0.537 0.526 0.515 0.505 0.496 0.487 0.479 0.471 0.463 0.430 0.403 0.380 0.361 0.330 0.305 0.286
Interpreting the correlation coefficient r and the coefficient of determination r2
For sample sizes n > 4, r is statistically significant if | r | > the critical value.
Example 1: n = 20 and r = 0.587 With n = 20 and r = 0.587, we can say there is a statically significant linear relationship between the explanatory variable and the response variable at the 0.01 level of significance. There is at most a 1% chance that this apparent relationship is due to chance or other unknown factors.
The coefficient of determination r2 = 0.3446. This tells us about 34% of the variation or change in the
response variable can be explained by variation or change in the explanatory variable. The remaining 66 % of the variation in the response variable is unexplained and is due to chance or other unknown factors.
Example 2: n = 9 and r = -0.758 With n = 9 and r = -0.758, we can say there is a statically significant linear relationship between the explanatory variable and the response variable at the 0.05 level of significance. There is at most a 5% chance that this apparent relationship is due to chance or other unknown factors.
The coefficient of determination r2 = 0.5746. This tells us about 57% of the variation or change in the
response variable can be explained by variation or change in the explanatory variable. The remaining 43 % of the variation in the response variable is unexplained and is due to chance or other unknown factors.
Example 3: n = 16 and r = 0.478 With n = 9 and r = 0.478, we can say there is no statistically significant linear relationship between the explanatory variable and the response variable at the 0.01 or 0.05 level of significance .
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- table a 7 critical values for the sign test
- chapter 9 correlation and regression
- table a5 critical values for correlation coefficient r
- statistical tables
- pearson edexcel level 3 advanced subsidiary and advanced
- upper critical values of spearman s rank correlation
- critical values of the spearman s ranked correlation
- critical values for correlation coefficients
- table of critical values of t university of sussex
- table of critical values for d f 0 1 0 05 0 02 0 01
Related searches
- correlation coefficient critical value table
- correlation coefficient of a correlation of 0 72
- significance level 0 01 critical value
- correlation coefficient of 0 95
- how to calculate critical correlation coefficient calculator
- correlation coefficient and critical value
- significance level 0 05 critical value
- correlation coefficient critical value
- critical value correlation coefficient table
- critical values for correlation coefficient
- critical values for pearson r
- critical values for linear correlation