LITERATURE CITED



Literature Cited

Abele, Ralph. (Abele.Ralph@epamail.). 2002. Summary of the Quinebaug River Flow Studies. U.S. EPA. E-mail to Theresa Beaudoin at Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated 4 February 2002.

Ackerman, M.T., 1989. Compilation of Lakes, Ponds, Reservoirs and Impoundments Relative to the Massachusetts Lake Classification Program. Publication: #15901-171-50-4-89-c.r. Technical Services Branch, Massachusetts Division of Water Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Westborough, MA.

ACOE. 1997. Westville Lake Brochure. US Army Corps of Engineers, New England District. NAEEP-360-1-51. Southbridge, MA.

ACOE. 2001. Update Report for Massachusetts October 31, 2001. US Army Corps of Engineers New England District, Concord, MA.

Arnold, J.M. and J.B. Smith. 1980. Webster Lake Water Quality Study 1975-1976. Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission, Worcester, MA and Massachusetts Division of Water Pollution Control, Westborough, MA.

Bain, M.B. and M.S. Meixler. 2000. Defining a Target Fish Community for Planning and Evaluating Enhancement of the Quinebaug River in Massachusetts and Connecticut. Cornell University, New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Ithaca, NY.

Barker, T. 1998. Water Quality Control Management Program. Annual Water Quality Report. Fiscal Year 1997. Department of the Army. New England District. Corps of Engineers. Waltham, MA.

Barker, T. 1999a. Water Quality Control Management Program. Annual Water Quality Report. Fiscal Year 1998. Department of the Army. New England District. Corps of Engineers. Waltham, MA.

Barker, T. 1999b. French River Priority Pollutant Scan. Department of the Army. New England District. Corps of Engineers. Waltham, MA.

Barker, T. 2000. Water Quality Control Management Program. Annual Water Quality Report. Fiscal Year 1999. Department of the Army. New England District. Corps of Engineers. Waltham, MA.

Barker, T. 2001. Water Quality Control Management Program. Annual Water Quality Report. Fiscal Year 2000. Department of the Army. New England District. Corps of Engineers. Waltham, MA.

Beaudoin, Therese. 15 September 2001a. Unpublished observations of drawdown conditions at the North Village Dam on the French River, Webster/Dudley. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Central Regional Office, Worcester, MA.

Beaudoin, Therese. 26 October 2001b. Unpublished observations of the Quinebaug River between the rotary at State Roads 169 and 131, and the West Dudley Dam. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Central Regional Office, Worcester, MA.

Beaudoin, Therese. 2002. Personal Communication. French & Quinebaug River Watershed data and information. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Central Regional Office, Worcester, MA.

BEC, Inc. 1985. Diagnostic/Feasibility Study of Walker Pond. Baystate Environmental Consultants, Inc. East Longmeadow, MA.

BEC, Inc. 1990. Diagnostic/Feasibility Study for the Management of Prindle Pond, Charlton, Massachusetts. Baystate Environmental Consultants, Inc. East Longmeadow, MA.

Breault, R.F. and S.L. Harris. 1997. Geographical distribution and potential for adverse biological effects of selected trace elements and organic compounds in streambed sediment in the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins, 1992-94. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4169. National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Water Resources Division. Marlborough, MA.

Cohen, Russ. 2001. Personal Communication. Field observations/ information for the French & Quinebaug River Watersheds. Massachusetts Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Environmental Law Enforcement, Riverways Program. Boston, MA.

Coles, J.F. 1998. Organochlorine compounds in fish tissue for the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins study unit, 1992-94. U.S. Geological Survey. Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4075. National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Water Resources Division. Marlborough, MA.

Cox Environmental Engineering. 1988. Final Report Septic System Management Program Webster Lake – Webster, MA. Revised October 17, 1988. Cox Environmental Engineering, Inc., Charlton, MA.

CT DEP and USDA NRCS. October 1998. Connecticut Unified Watershed Assessment. CT DEP, Hartford, CT.

Cullinan Engineering Co., Inc. 1983. Diagnostic/Feasibility Study for Hamilton Reservoir. Cullinan Engineering Co., Inc. Civil Engineers/Environmental Consultants/Land Surveyors. Auburn and Boston, MA.

Davies III, B.S., J. Morrison, S.S. Keisman, and M.J. Colombo. 1997. Water Resources Data for Connecticut, Water Year 1996. U.S. Geological Survey Report CT-96-1. Water Resources Division, Hartford, CT.

Davies III, B.S., J. Morrison, J.R. Bohr, and T.C. Sargent. 1998. Water Resources Data for Connecticut, Water Year 1997. U.S. Geological Survey Report CT-97-1. Water Resources Division, East Hartford, CT.

Davies III, B.S., J. Morrison, J.R. Norris, and J.A. Organek. 1999. Water Resources Data for Connecticut, Water Year 1998. U.S. Geological Survey Report CT-98-1. Water Resources Division, East Hartford, CT.

Domizio, Linda. 2001. Personal Communication. French & Quinebaug River Basins: Phase II storm water permit requirements. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

Environmental Law Reporter. 1988. Clean Water Deskbook. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C.

Environment Canada. 04 November 1999. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. [Online]. Environment Canada. [28 September 1998].

EPA. 1997. Guidelines for Preparation of the Comprehensive State Water Quality Assessments (305(b) Reports) and Electronic Updates: Report Contents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Assessment and Watershed Protection Division (4503F). Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. Office of Water, Washington D.C.

EPA. 1986. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the French River Cleanup Program in Massachusetts and Connecticut. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Boston, MA.

EPA. 1999. 1999 Update of Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water and Office of Science and Technology. Washington, D.C. an Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN.

EPA. 19 November 1999. Federal Register Document. [Online]. United States Environmental Protection Agency. .

ESS, Inc. 2001. French and Quinebaug Watersheds Habitat Assessment Report Project No. 00-05/MWI. ESS Project No. M230-000. Environmental Science Services, Inc. Wellesley, MA.

Fennessey, N. M., R. Baglini, R. Baptista, P. Cordeiro, N. Cordello, C. Hudson, S. Orlowski and C. Vogt. 2001. The Hydrology and Hydraulic Characteristics of the Lakes, Ponds and Reservoirs Within the Quinebaug River Watershed. University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hydrology and Water Resources Group. Dartmouth, MA.

Garabedian S.P., J.F. Coles, S.J. Grady, E.C.T. Trench and M.J. Zimmermen. 1998. Water Quality in the Connecticut, Housatonic and Thames River Basins, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Vermont, 1992-95. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1155. Marlborough, MA.

Goggins, Charles. 2001. Personal Communication. FERC licensed facilities in the French and Quinebaug watersheds. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), New York. 25 October 2001.

Grader, Melissa. (Melissa_Grader@). 2001. Fish passage information for the French and Quinebaug watersheds. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/New England Field Office. E-mail to Stella Kiras at Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated 2 November 2001.

Halliwell, D.B., W.A. Kimball and A.J. Screpetis. 1982. Massachusetts Stream Classification Program Part I: Inventory of Rivers and Streams. Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Recreational Vehicles and Massachusetts Division of Water Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Quality Engineering. Westborough, MA.

Harris, S.L. 1997. Inorganic and organic constituents and grain-size distribution in streambed sediment and ancillary data for the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins study unit, 1992-94. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 96-937. National Water-Quality Assessment. Marlborough, MA.

Hartman, E.M. 2001. Draft. 1999 Cady Brook, Quinebaug River Water Quality and Wastewater Discharge Data. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

Hogan, Paul. 2001. Personal Communication. French and Quinebaug River Basin: NPDES permitting information. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

Johnson, Ray. 2002. Personal communication. Status of Bethlem Steel groundwater remediation cleanup discharge - MA0034924. Rizzo Associates. Framingham, MA.

Josti, John. Letter to Kathleen Keohane dated 8 July 2001. Lucent Technologies MAG250003. Josti Associates, Framingham, MA.

Kimball, W.A., 1996. Memorandum to 305(b) Committee. Re: Small data sets/ wet weather data. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Watershed Management. Grafton, MA.

Lavengood, Richard. Letter to Joe O’Brien dated 11 August 2001. Temperature survey – Buffum Pond August 2001. RELCO Engineering, Longmeadow, MA.

LeVangie, D. 2001. Water withdrawal registration and permit information. Water Management Act Database. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Database Manager. Boston, MA.

Lycott Environmental Research, Inc. 1981. Big Alum Lake Restoration and Preservation Project 1980. Lycott Environmental Research, Inc. Southbridge, Massachusetts.

MA DEM. 1993. Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) Program Guide June 1993. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Department of Environmental Management, ACEC Program, Boston, MA.

MA DEM. 2002a. Current Water Conditions in Massachusetts – July 12, 2001. MA DEM Rainfall Program. [Online] . 28 January 2002.

MA DEM. 2002b. Current Water Conditions in Massachusetts – August 9, 2001. MA DEM Rainfall Program. [Online] . 28 January 2002.

MA DEP. 1996. (Revision of 1995 report). Massachusetts surface water quality standards. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water Pollution Control, Technical Services Branch. Westborough, MA 114p. (Revision of 314 CMR 4.00, effective June 23, 1996.)

MA DEP. 1998. Water Withdrawal Permit 9P2-2-09-278.01 for Millennium Power Partners, L.P. effective January 28, 1998. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Boston, MA.

MA DEP and DEM. 1998. Eutrophication and Aquatic Plant Management in Massachusetts Draft Generic Environmental Impact Report. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management. Worcester, MA and Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management, Boston, MA.

MA DEP. 1999a. Final Massachusetts Section 303(d) List of Waters 1998. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

MA DEP. 1999b. Open File. Department of Watershed Management 305(b) Assessment Guidance. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management. Worcester, MA

MA DEP. 2000a. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Summary of Water Quality 2000. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

MA DEP. 2000b. Open files. License applications for herbicide treatment: 1998 through 2000. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

MA DEP. 2001a. Open File. PALIS updates. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

MA DEP. 2001b. Open NPDES permit files. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

Maher, A. 2001. NHESP Certified Vernal Pools Database (1 January 2001). MA Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Environmental Law Enforcement. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. Westborough, MA.

MassGIS. 2001. Hydrography - statewide 1:25000. MassGIS (MA Office of Geographic and Environmental Information), Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Boston, MA.

MassWildlife. 2001. Draft April 2001 Coldwater Fisheries Resource List. Massachusetts Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Environmental Law Enforcement, Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, MA.

Mattson, Mark. 2002. Personal Communication. French & Quinebaug River Basins Lake TMDL Status. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

MDPH. 1969. Article 7 Regulation 10.2B of the State Sanitary Code. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Department of Public Health. Boston, MA.

MDPH. 2001a. Freshwater Fish Consumption Advisory List. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Environmental Health Assessment. Boston, MA.

MDPH. 2001b. Public Health Statewide Fish Consumption Advisory issued July 2001. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Bureau of Environmental Health Assessment, Boston, MA.

MDPH. 2002 Impending Fish Consumption Advisory for Buffumville Lake. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Environmental Health Assessment. Boston, MA.

Mollison, Steve. 2002. Facsimile to Stella Kiras dated 18 January 2002. Bacteria data and beach closures at Streeter Beach and Wells State Park Beach for 2001. Department of Environmental Management, Division of Forest and Parks, Region IV, Amherst, MA.

Northeast US Climate Data. 2002a. Daily Climate Data for Worcester, MA June 2001. [Online] . 28 January 2002.

Northeast US Climate Data. 2002b. Daily Climate Data for Worcester, MA July 2001. [Online] . 28 January 2002.

Notini, B. R. and G.E. Whittaker. 1982. Cedar Pond Diagnostic Study April 1980-1981. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Division of Water Pollution Control. Westborough, MA.

Ostrosky, John. 2002. Personal Communication. Status of municipal wastewater treatment facilities compliance with their NPDES permits in the French and Quinebaug River Basins. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Resource Protection, Central Regional Office. Worcester, MA.

Parasiewicz, P. 2001. MesoHABSIM: A concept for application of instream flow modes in river restoration planning. [Online] . 30 January 2002.

Parasiewics, P. and A.S. Gallagher. 2002. Ecohydrology study of Quinebaug River – Interim Report. Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources, New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit and Instream Habitat Program. Ithaca, NY.

Pelto, M. S. 1998. Importance of Aquifer Mass Balance Examination for Groundwater Management In Local Communities. Unpublished report presented at the 1998 MEES Conference. Nichols College, Dudley.

Pelto, M. S. 1999a. Hydrologic Balance of the Quinebaug River Watershed for April 1999 in the vicinity of Southbridge, MA. Unpublished report. Nichols College, Dudley.

Pelto, M. S. 1999b. Hydrologic Balance of the Quinebaug River Watershed for May 1999 in the vicinity of Southbridge, MA. Unpublished report. Nichols College, Dudley.

Pelto, M. S. 1999c. Hydrologic Balance of the Quinebaug River Watershed for June 1999 in the vicinity of Southbridge, MA. Unpublished report. Nichols College, Dudley.

Persaud, D., R. Jaagumagi, and A. Hayton. 1993. Guidelines for the protection and management of aquatic sediment quality in Ontario. Water Resources Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment. Ontario, Canada.

Phippen, P. and S. Reynells. 2000. Hamilton Reservoir Watershed Study. Conway School for Landscape Design. Conway, MA.

Ranzau Jr., C.E., T.W. Frick, J.R. Norris, and J.W. Martin. 2000. Water Resources Data for Connecticut, Water Year 1999. U.S. Geological Survey Report CT-99-1. Water Resources Division, East Hartford, CT.

Ranzau Jr., C.E., B.S. Davies III, T.W. Frick, T.M. Collins. 2001. Water Resources Data for Connecticut, Water Year 2000. U.S. Geological Survey Report CT-00-1. Water Resources Division, East Hartford, CT.

Richards, Todd. 2002. (TRichards@DFW@FWE Westboro). Quinebaug River Fish Population Data. MA Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Communication with Department of Environmental Protection. MA. E-mail to Laurie Kennedy, MA DEP dated 4 January 2002.

Rojko, A. M., W. A. Kimball, and A. J. Screpetis. 1995. Designated Outstanding Resource Waters of Massachusetts 1995. Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Resource Protection, Office of Watershed Management, Grafton, MA.

Scarlet, Ginny. 2001. Personal Communication. French and Quinebaug River basins: stormwater permitting information. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

SFC. 1999. Lake George Pond Dam. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Office of Dam Safety, Municipally owned Dam Inspection/Evaluation Report prepared by SFC Engineering Partnership, Inc. 29 April.

Socolow, R.S., J.L. Zanca, D. Murino Jr., and L.R. Ramsbey. 2000. Water Resources Data for Massachusetts and Rhode Island, Water Year 1999. U.S. Geological Survey Report MA-RI-99-1. Water Resources Division, Northboro, MA.

Socolow, Roy. 2002. Personal Communication. Fluctuations in streamflow of the Quinebaug River at Westville Dam and Quinebaug Connecticut. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Northboro, MA.

Tatsutani, M. Editor. NESCAUM, NEWMOA, NEIWPCC, EMAN. 1998. Northeast States/Eastern Canadian Provinces Mercury Study A Framework for Action. Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), Northeast Waste Management Official’s Association (NEWMOA), New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission (NEIWPCC), and Canadian Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network (EMAN).

Thomas, Eric. 10 October, 2001. Personal communication. Source of flows into Hamilton Reservoir from Connecticut lakes and streams. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, CT.

Thomas, Eric. 2002. Letter to Theresa Beaudoin dated 8 January 2002. Comments on the draft French & Quinebaug River Basin Water Quality Assessment Report. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, CT.

UMass Amherst. 1999. Land Use Datalayer - statewide 1:25000. Published by MassGIS (MA Office of Geographic and Environmental Information), Executive Office of Environmental Affairs for the Resource Mapping Project at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA.

USGS 18 December 2001. Provisional Data Subject to Revision for 01124350 – French River below Hodges Village Dam at Hodges Village. [Online]. Unites States Geological Survey. . 18 December 2001.

USGS 21 December 2001. Provisional Data Subject to Revision for 01123360 – Quinebaug River downstream from East Brimfield Dam. [Online]. Unites States Geological Survey. . 18 December 2001.

USGS 5 February 2002. Provisional Data Subject to Revision for Quinebaug River streamflow gages (01123600 and 01124000). [Online]. Unites States Geological Survey. . 5 February 2002.

USGS 2001. DEM/DEP/USGS Fourth Quarter FY01 Program Review-Reporting Period: October 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001 Project report for assessing sediment quality and quantity for proposed dam-removal projects. Unites States Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Northborough, MA.

Zimmerman, M. 1999. Pesticides in Surface Water in the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins, 1992-1995. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 98-4247. National Water-Quality Assessment. Northborough, MA.

Zimmerman, Marc. 2002. Personal Communication. Sediment sampling information for Perryville Impoundment conducted by USGS in July 2001 as part of the assessing sediment quality and quantity for proposed dam-removal projects. Unites States Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Northborough, MA.

list of appendices, TABLES AND FIGURES

APPENDIX A – DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR 1999 MA DEP/DWM French & quinebaug river Basins MONITORING DATA (ALSO includes 1998 and 1994 FISH TOXICS MONITORING DATA)

Table A2.1.1. Data Symbols and Qualifiers.

Table A5.1.1. 1998-99 French & Quinebaug River Basins Censored/Qualified Hydrolab® Data.

Table A5.2.1. 1999 MA DEP DWM in-lake physico-chemical QA/QC field blank data.

Table A5.2.2. 1999 MA DEP DWM in-lake physico-chemical QA/QC field replicate data.

Table A5.2.3. 1999 MA DEP/CERO “SMART” Monitoring: French & Quinebaug River Basins instream physico-chemical QA/QC field blank data.

Table A5.2.4. 1999 MA DEP/CERO “SMART” Monitoring: French & Quinebaug River Basins instream physico-chemical QA/QC field replicate data.

Table A5.2.5. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook Project: in-stream physico-chemical QA/QC field blank data.

Table A5.2.6. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook Project: in-stream physico-chemical QA/QC field replicate data.

Table A5.2.7. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook Project: in-stream bacteriological QA/QC field blank data.

Table A5.2.8. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook Project: in-stream bacteriological QA/QC field replicate data.

Table A5.2.9. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook Project: in-stream phosphorus QA/QC field blank data.

Table A5.2.10. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook Project: in-stream phosphorus QA/QC field replicate data.

Table A5.2.11. 1999 MA DEP French & Quinebaug River Basins Censored/Qualified Discrete Water Sample Data.

Table A5.4.1. 1999, 1998 and 1994 MA DEP DWM laboratory QA/QC blank data for organics in fish tissue.

Table A.5.4.2. 1999, 1998 and 1994 MA DEP DWM French & Quinebaug River Basins laboratory QA/QC data for metals in fish tissue.

Table A5.4.3. 1999 and 1998 MA DEP DWM laboratory QA/QC lab fortified blank data for organics in fish tissue.

Table A5.4.4. 1999, 1998 and 1994 MA DEP DWM laboratory QA/QC duplicate data for organics in fish tissue.

Table A5.4.5. 1999, 1998 and 1994 MA DEP DWM laboratory QA/QC lab fortified matrix and matrix spike duplicate data for organics in fish tissue.

Table A6.1. 1999, 1998 and 1994 Analytical Methods

APPENDIX B - 1999 MA DEP DWM French & quinebaug river Basins survey data (ALSO includes 1998 and 1994 FISH TOXICS MONITORING DATA)

Table B1. 1999 MA DEP DWM French River Basin sampling matrix.

Table B2. 1999 MA DEP DWM Quinebaug River Basin sampling matrix.

Table B3. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook drainage area in-situ Hydrolab® data.

Table B4. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook drainage area, instream physico/chemical data.

Table B5. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook phosphorus data.

Table B6. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook bacteria data.

Table B7. 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook stream discharge measurements.

Table B8. 1999 MA DEP/CERO “SMART” Monitoring French and Quinebaug River Basins in-situ Hydrolab® data.

Table B9. 1999 MA DEP/CERO “SMART” Monitoring French and Quinebaug River Basins instream physico/chemical data.

Table B10. 1998 MA DEP DWM Quinebaug River Basin 97-09/104 Project on Numeric Biocriteria in-situ Hydrolab® data.

Table B11. 1999 MA DEP DWM aquatic macrophyte observations at selected 303d listed lakes in the French River Basin.

Table B12. 1999 MA DEP DWM aquatic macrophyte observations at selected 303d listed lakes in the Quinebaug River Basin.

Table B13. 1999 MA DEP DWM French & Quinebaug River Basins in-situ Hydrolab® lake data.

Table B14. 1999 MA DEP DWM French & Quinebaug River Basins inlake Secchi depth, alkalinity, color, total phosphorus and chlorophyll a data.

Table B15. 1999 MA DEP DWM French River Basin fish toxics monitoring data for Buffumville Lake, Charlton/Oxford and Webster Lake, Webster.

Table B16. 1998 MA DEP DWM fish toxics monitoring data for Texas Pond, Oxford and the Quinebaug River, Brimfield.

Table B17. 1994 MA DEP OWM fish toxics monitoring data for the Hamilton Reservoir, Holland and French River (Thayers Pond - impoundment at Clara Barton Road), Oxford.

Table B18. French River Basin 1994 summer lake status.

Table B19. Quinebaug River Basin 1994 summer lake status.

Figure B1. Locations of the 1999 MA DEP DWM Cady Brook water quality sampling stations, the 1999 MA DEP/CERO “SMART” water quality sampling stations and the 1998 Numeric Biocriteria sampling stations in the French & Quinebaug River Basins..

Figure B2. Locations of 1999 TMDL lake sampling stations in the French & Quinebaug River Basins.

Figure B3. Locations of 1999, 1998, and 1994 MA DEP fish toxics monitoring stations in the French & Quinebaug River Basins.

APPEndix c - Technical Memorandum #TM- 41/42- FRENCH & QUINEBAUG RIVER WATERSHEDS 1999 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

Table 1. List of macroinvertebrate biomonitoring station locations sampled during the 1999 French & Quinebaug River watersheds survey, including station identification number, station description, and sampling date.

Table 2. List of perceived problems addressed during the 1999 French & Quinebaug River watersheds biomonitoring survey.

Figure 1. Location of DWM biomonitoring stations for the 1999 French & Quinebaug River watersheds survey.

APPENDIX D – SUMMARY OF NPDES and WMA PERMITTING INFORMATION, FRENCH & QUINEBAUG RIVER BASINS

Table D1. French & Quinebaug River Basins Municipal Surface Wastewater Discharges.

Table D2. French & Quinebaug River Basins Industrial Treatment Plants.

Table D3. List of WMA registered and permitted average annual water withdrawals in the French and Quinebaug River Basins

APPENDIX E – MA DEP GRANT AND LOAN PROGRAMS

APPENDIX F – SUMMARY OF INSTREAM FLOW STUDIES QUINEBAUG RIVER MASSACHUSETTS AND CONNECTICUT 1999 - 2001

APPENDIX G – Technical Memorandum FRENCH AND QUINEBAUG RIVERS – PERIPHYTON SURVEY RESULTS 1999

Table 1. French and Quinebaug Rivers-1999 Station Numbers and Station Descriptions

Table 2. French River-Cady Brook-1999 Station Locations for Periphyton Biomass

Table 3. French and Quinebaug Rivers: Dominant Alga Type, % Algal Cover, % Canopy Cover –1999 Rapid Bioassessment Surveys

Table 4. Cady Brook, Quinebaug River-Average Ash Free Dry Mass (g AFDM m-2 and Average Productivity (P)( mg ash-free weight/m2/day)-1999

Figure G1. Cady Brook: July and August 1999 Ash Free Dry Mass (mg/cm2)

APPENDIX A – DATA VALIDATION REPORT FOR 1999 MA DEP/DWM FRENCH & QUINEBAUG RIVER BASINS Assessment (ALSO includes 1998 and 1994 FISH TOXICS MONITORING DATA)

PREFACE:

The objective of DWM’s data validation process is to ensure that the quality of monitoring data meets defined criteria for acceptability as “final”, usable data. This is accomplished by thoroughly reviewing and evaluating all draft data and associated field and laboratory quality control information.

This report includes evaluation of all 1999 data collected in the French and Quinebaug River Basins by DWM as part of Year-2 monitoring, as well as from MA DEP/CERO programmatic monitoring (SMART) and two DWM special projects (1999 Cady Brook Project and the 1997-98 Project on Numeric Biocriteria). In addition to 1999 fish toxics data, this report also includes previously unreported 1998 and 1994 fish toxics data collected in the French & Quinebaug River Basins.

This Appendix is divided into seven sections as follows:

- A1. Introduction

- A2. The Data Validation Process for 1999 French & Quinebaug Data

- A3. 1999 QAPPs/SOPs Used in French & Quinebaug Basins Monitoring

- A4. 1999 QA/QC Acceptance Criteria for French & Quinebaug Data

- A5. QC-Sample Data And Validation Decisions For French & Quinebaug River Basins (1999 and 1998 Water Quality; 1999 and 1994 Fish Toxics Data)

- A6. 1999 Analytical Methods and MDLs

- A7. Conclusions

A1. INTRODUCTION

The following data were collected by MA DEP/DWM and MA DEP/CERO personnel in the French & Quinebaug River Basins, and were used in this assessment:

French River Basin

- In –situ Hydrolab® readings and associated water sampling at six lakes and one tributary inlet,

- In –situ Hydrolab® readings and associated CERO/SMART monitoring at one river/stream station,

- Fish tissue toxics data at two lakes, and

- Benthic macroinvertebrates and aquatic habitat assessment at a total of seven river/stream stations.

Quinebaug River Basin

- In –situ Hydrolab® readings and associated inlake sampling at five lakes and one tributary inlet,

- In –situ Hydrolab® readings and associated CERO/SMART monitoring at two river/stream stations,

- In –situ Hydrolab® readings and associated Cady Brook Project sampling at eleven river/stream stations in 1999,

- In –situ Hydrolab® readings at two river/stream stations in 1998, as part of the Project on Numeric Biocriteria,

- Flow measurements at nine river/stream stations, and

- Benthic macroinvertebrates and aquatic habitat assessment at a total of ten river/stream stations.

For monitoring locations, parameters and dates, see Tables B1 and B2 in Appendix B.

A2. The Data Validation Process for 1999, 1998 and 1994 French & Quinebaug Basin Data

The procedures used to accept, accept with qualification or censor data were based on the draft DWM Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for data validation (MA DEP 2002). These procedures are supplemental to separate data quality assurance activities and laboratory validation performed by the analytical laboratory, Wall Experiment Station (WES).

The data validation SOP outlines specific criteria by which to evaluate data quality and acceptability. These criteria pertain to the following elements:

- Conformance to DWM-project and DWM-programmatic Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

- Precision (review of overall precision, including field precision and lab precision)

- Accuracy (review of lab quality control data regarding analysis of blind performance evaluation samples, internal check standards, blanks and matrix spike samples)

- Representativeness (review of field data sheets and field SOPs used to collect the data for the evidence of the potential for non-representative conditions at the time of sampling)

- Holding Times and Preservation (review for conformance to method holding times and preservation requirements for samples)

- Frequency of Field QC samples (review for conformance to standard DWM requirements for the number of field blank and split/duplicate samples taken per total number of samples taken)

- Contamination of Field Blanks (review of blank analyses for detectable analyte concentrations)

- Completeness (review of the amount of usable data in comparison to that intended to be collected)

- Chain-of-Custody (review of sample handling and transfer records)

Data that fell outside QA/QC acceptance criteria were investigated and may have been subject to censoring or qualification. Specific symbols and qualifiers used to censor and qualify data are provided in Table A2.1.1.

Completion of 1999 data validation for the French and Quinebaug data resulted in the entry of the “final” data into the DWM water quality database, and its use for assessment purposes.

Table A2.1.1. Data Symbols and Qualifiers.

|Symbol/ |Data Source |Definition |

|Qualifier | | |

|** |All |Censored or missing data |

|-- |All |No data |

|10, 20 or 40 NTU). It can also be used for TDS and Salinity calculations based on qualified (“c”) |

| | |conductivity data, or that the calculation was not possible due to censored conductivity data ( TDS and Salinity|

| | |are calculated values and entirely based on conductivity reading). |

|i |Hydrolab® |inaccurate readings from Hydrolab® multiprobe likely; may be due to significant pre-survey calibration problems,|

| | |post-survey calibration readings outside typical acceptance range for the low ionic check and for the deionized |

| | |blank water check, or lack of calibration of the depth sensor prior to use. |

Table A2.1.1. Continued. 1999 Data Symbols and Qualifiers.

|Symbol/ |Data Source |Definition |

|Qualifier | | |

|M |Hydrolab® |method not followed; one or more protocols contained in the DWM Hydrolab® SOP not followed, ie. operator error |

| | |(eg. less than 3 readings per station (rivers) or per depth (lakes), or instrument failure not allowing method |

| | |to be implemented. |

|s |Hydrolab® |Field sheet-recorded data were used to accept data (not the data electronically recorded in the Hydrolab® |

| | |surveyor unit), due to operator error or equipment failure. |

|u |Hydrolab® |unstable readings, due to lack of sufficient equilibration time prior to final readings, non-representative |

| | |location, highly-variable water quality conditions, etc. |

|? |Hydrolab® |Light interference on Turbidity sensor (Hydrolab® error message). Data is typically censored. |

|a |Discrete |accuracy as estimated at WES Lab via matrix spikes, PT sample recoveries, internal check standards and |

| |samples |lab-fortified blanks did not meet project data quality objectives identified for program or in QAPP. |

|b |Discrete |blank Contamination in lab reagant blanks and/or field blank samples (indicating possible bias high and false |

| |samples |positives). |

|d |Discrete |Precision of field duplicates (as RPD) did not meet project data quality objectives identified for program or |

| |samples |in QAPP. |

|e |Flow data |Flow data estimated, due to field measurement error, complication or anomaly. |

|f |Discrete |frequency of quality control duplicates did not meet data quality objectives identified for program or in QAPP. |

| |samples | |

|h |Discrete |holding time violation (usually indicating possible bias low) |

| |samples | |

|j |Discrete |‘estimated’ value; used for lab-related issues where certain lab QC criteria are not met and re-testing is not |

| |samples |possible (as identified by the WES lab only). Also used by WES to report sample data where the sample |

| | |concentration is less than the ‘reporting’ limit or RDL and greater than the method detection limit or MDL |

| | |(mdl< x calibration range (718) |

|Cady Brook |8/17/99 |41-0066 and 0067 |Conductivity (and TDS) |Qualify (c) |> calibration range (718) |

|Cady Brook |8/17/99 |41-0075 |Conductivity (and TDS) |Qualify (c) |> calibration range (718) |

|Cady Brook |8/18/99 |41-0083 and 0085 |Conductivity (and TDS) |Qualify (c) |> calibration range (718) |

|Cady Brook |7/27/99 |41-0119 through 0125 |D.O., temp, cond, pH, % |Accept all |SRV3 electronic data lost due |

| | | |saturation, depth and |field sheet |to battery failure; accept |

| | | |TDS |Hydrolab data, |field sheet data with |

| | | | |and qualify all|qualification. |

| | | | |data (s) | |

|Gore Pond |8/4/99 |LB-0099 |D.O. and %SAT at 2.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

| | | |Temp at 3.5 and 4.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

|Gore Pond |9/1/99 |LB-0505 |D.O. and % SAT at 3.4 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

|Larner Pond |7/28/99 |LB-0074 |D.O. and % SAT at 2.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

| | | |depth | | |

|Larner Pond |7/28/99 |LB-0075 |Temperature at 2.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

| | | |depth | | |

|Larner Pond |9/22/99 |LB-0373 |D.O. and % SAT at 2.5 |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

| | | |and 3.0 m | | |

|Pierpont Meadow |8/4/99 |LB-0098 |D.O., temp, cond, pH, % |Qualify (m) |Low equilibration time: |

|Pond | | |saturation, depth and | |readings < one minute |

| | | |TDS at depths 2.5 and | |intervals AND only three |

| | | |2.8 | |readings per depth |

| | | |Temp at 2.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

|Pierpont Meadow |8/4/99 |LB-0100 |D.O. and % SAT at 2.5 |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

|Pond | | | | | |

|Rochdale Pond |8/5/99 |LB-0109 |D.O. and % SAT at 2.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

| | | |Temp at 3.1m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

|Wallis Pond |8/26/99 |LB-0213 |D.O. and % SAT at 0.3 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings (very low DO|

| | | | | |continuing to fall after 5 |

| | | | | |readings) |

|Wallis Pond |9/22/99 |LB-0368 |Depth |Qualify (i) |Depth inaccurate (0.1) |

Table A5.1.1. Continued. 1998-99 French & Quinebaug River Basins Censored/Qualified Hydrolab® Data.

|Watershed |Survey |OWMID #s |Censored/ Qualified |Censored/ |Reason and/or Clarification |

| |Date(s) | |Parameters |Qualified | |

|Mill Road Pond |9/29/99 |LB-0231 |D.O. and % SAT at 0.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

|Sibley Pond north |7/29/99 |LB-0502 |D.O. and % SAT at 1.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

|Sibley Pond north |8/25/99 |LB-0211 |Temp at 0.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

| | | |D.O. and % SAT at 1.5 m |Qualify (u) | |

|Sibley Pond north |8/25/99 |LB-0206 |D.O. and % SAT at 1.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

| | | |Temp at 0.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

|Sibley Pond south |7/29/99 |LB-0501 |D.O. and % SAT at 0.5 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

|Sibley Pond south |8/25/99 |LB-0210 |D.O. and % SAT at 1.3 m |Qualify (u) |Unstable readings |

A5.2 Discrete Sample Data Validation

A5.2.1 Quality Control Sample Results

Field blank and field replicate sampling results for all discrete lake quality control sample data taken in 1999 are provided in Tables A.5.2.1 through Table A5.2.6. Quality control sample data are stored and maintained in the Water Quality Data (WQD) Access Database.

For Tables A5.2.1 and A5.2.2 all 1999 lake quality control samples are listed; for multiple lake surveys, certain lakes may not have quality control samples.

Table A5.2.1. 1999 MA DEP DWM in-lake physico-chemical QA/QC field blank data. (All units expressed in mg/L unless otherwise specified.)

Date OWMID OWMID Alkalinity Color Total

QA/QC (mg/L) (PCU) Phosphorus

(mg/L)

Field Blank Sample

08/03/99 LB-0078 BLANK ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download