JustAnswer



this test requires that the suspect must have done or omitted to do something that constitutes a required and sizable in a course of conduct planned to culminate in the commission of the substantive offense. Under this test, an attempt occurs when a person's conduct alone unambiguously manifests his or her criminal intent. Under this test, a suspect who has not yet gained control over a necessary instrumentality of the criminal plan cannot be guilty of attempt Which of the following is an agreement between two or more people to commit an unlawful act or acts or to do a lawful act unlawfully?SolicitationConspiracyAbandonmentAttempt The ________ test, established in the English case of Regina v. Eagleton, is no longer utilized because most lawmakers believe that a person does not have to take the very last step to be criminally culpableIndispensable element testlast act testphysical proximity testdangerous proximity testunequivocality test Under the ________ test, a person is guilty of attempt when his or her conduct is very close to success, or when an act is so near to the result that the probability of success is very great. indispensable element testlast act testphysical proximity testunequivocality testdangerous proximity test If a defendant "attempted to murder" someone by swatting him or her over the head with a fly swatter, the defendant would likely be able to prove that he or she did not have the ________ to murder, because it is impossible to kill someone in this manner.actus reusmens reaconcurrent of actus reus and mens reacausationThe crime of ________ is said to exist as a necessary and important aid to law enforcement because secret enterprises threaten society and are extremely difficult to detect.abandonmentrenunciationsolicitationconspiracyfacilitation Question 7 1 pts Under the ________ test, the perpetrator need not have advanced so far as the last act, and an attempt has not been committed unless the accused has the immediate power to actually carry through with the crime at the time of the intervention of the police.indispensable element testlast act testphysical proximity testunequivocality testdangerous proximity testWhich of the following is a defense used when a person's intended end constitutes a crime, but the actor does not complete the act that would have been a crime because of circumstances unknown to him or her or beyond his or her control?pure legal impossibilityfactual impossibilitygenuine legal impossibilityhybrid impossibility Flag this QuestionQuestion 9 1 pts Abandonment is a valid defense when:the defendant has had a change of heart on his or her own, because of a sincere belief that furtherance of the act is wrong.the defendant abandons the criminal plan because he or she was unable to carry out the attempt due to some logistical or technical reason.the defendant postpones the project until a better time arises to carry out the crime.the defendant abandons the criminal plan because law enforcement intervened. Under the MPC, the intent requirement can be met even though a defendant may not have desired or wanted a particular result, if it can be shown that the defendant acted with:the mens rea of recklessness, which essentially holds that "anything goes."the mens rea of negligence, which implies that the defendant was deliberately careless about the results to avoid culpability.a desire that a certain result would occur, but a willingness to accept any other result, even arrest.a substantial certainty that a certain result would occur. An argument against the abandonment defense is that it:allows an actor to undo criminal plans by renunciation and avoid punishment, a possibility that may encourage persons to take preliminary steps toward a crime.allows a defendant who sincerely renounces crime to escape liability.timing is not relevant, and people should be guilty at any stage of the criminal plan regardless of whether or not actions were taken to further that plancurrently applies only to involuntary renunciations In 1784, the English court first recognized the crime of attempt in:Rex v. HigginsMiranda v. ArizonaPeople v. OrndorffRex v. Scofield Under the ________ test, a suspect who has not yet gained control over a necessary instrumentality of the criminal plan cannot be guilty of attempt. indispensable element testlast act testphysical proximity testunequivocality testdangerous proximity testwhich of the following are criminal acts that are punished before the ultimate or intended harm occurs? misdemeanorsinchoate crimescompleted crimesfeloniesPetty offenses Factual impossibility is not a defense to the crime of attempt.TrueFalse The general intent requirement for attempted crimes makes sense, because the concept of attempt encompasses the idea that a person is trying to commit a specific act. TrueFalseUnder common law, the physical impossibility of accomplishing the crime frequently prevents conviction. TrueFalseIt has been said that the only difference between the man who attempts and fails and another who attempts and succeeds may be chance.TrueFalse If an accused argues that he or she abandoned the criminal enterprise and did not intend to actually commit the crime, he or she can still be charged with and found guilty of attempt.TrueFalse Abandonment is a valid defense, in those jurisdictions that recognize it as such, only when the accused has a genuine change of heart about committing the crime and clearly manifests the desire to abandon the criminal enterprise entirely.TrueFalseThe mens rea of conspiracy is the act of reaching an agreement. TrueFalse One of the basic principles of Anglo-American criminal law is that the law does not punish people for their actions.TrueFalse Inchoate crimes also have actus reus and mens rea requirements.TrueFalse Today, an attempt to commit a substantive crime is usually classified as an equal crime to the target or object offense. TrueFalse All modern jurisdictions similarly require that the solicitor have a mental state of desiring that the crime be carried out.TrueFalse The salient issue in the impossibility defense is whether the law should punish a person who has attempted to do what was not possible under the existing circumstances.TrueFalseThe device must be one that is customarily used for the purpose of protection, and reasonable care must be taken to make probable intruders aware that the device is being used.The device must be reasonable under the circumstances.The device must not be designed to cause or create a substantial risk of death or serious injury.The device must carry automatic ammunition and have a shroud. The common law rule, case law, and statutes concerning self-defense require that the defendant reasonably believe that his or her adversary's unlawful violence, especially deadly force, have any three of the following time-related characteristics. Which of the following is NOT an appropriate characteristic?PostponedImminenthappen at oncealmost immediately forthcoming A defense is based upon a(n) ____ when the actor has violated a criminal statue but there is a reason for not holding him or her personally accountable. true defenseaffirmative defenseexcusejustification Your text names three noteworthy situations that would lead to a valid assertion of the duress defense under the MPC but not under common law. Which of the following is NOT one of these three?a person who must kill another person in order to prevent his or her own deatha person who is brainwashed, or coerced, over time into committing an illegal act by responding to earlier threats that have rendered the actor submissivean escape from prison to avoid an intolerable condition or circumstancea battered woman commits a crime at the suggestion of her abusive partner According to the MPC provisions, an officer or private citizen may not use deadly force to prevent the commission of a crime unless he or she believes: that there is a substantial risk that the suspect will cause the death or serious bodily injury to another person unless prevented from doing so, and that the use of deadly force presents no substantial risk to bystanders.that there is any risk that the suspect may cause the death or serious bodily injury to another person unless prevented from doing so, and that the use of deadly force presents minimal substantial risk to bystanders. Once a defendant has been charged with a criminal offense, the prosecutor has the burden of producing evidence and proving beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of the four elements of criminal culpability. Which of the following is NOT one of these four elements? an actual and proximate causal connection between the actus reus and the social harmthe defendant's voluntary act, or omission when there was a duty to actthe concurrence of motive and intentthe social harm resulting from the offense Usually, a defendant must prove three elements in order to be acquitted of a crime because of self-defense. Which of the following is NOT one of these three elements? the necessity of using force (including the use of deadly force only "to prevent imminent and unlawful use of deadly force by the aggressor")whether a weapon was used, and whether it was lethal or nonlethalthe reasonableness of the belief that force was necessarythe proportionality of the force to the threat (i.e., the level of force used in self-defense cannot be excessive in light of the level of force threatened) There are five legal tests, or rules, that have been adopted by jurisdictions in the United States to determine the sanity of an accused. Which of the following is no longer used?the product testthe American Law Institute testthe federal testthe M'Naghten Private citizens can make citizens' arrests under the common law rule for three of the following reasons. Which of the following is NOT a legitimate reason?For a misdemeanor involving a breach of the peace, if the crime actually occurred and the citizen reasonably believed the suspect committed the offense.For certain misdemeanors committed in the citizen's presenceFor a felony, if the crime actually occurred and the citizen reasonably believed the suspect committed the offenseFor a felony, if the crime may have occurred and the citizen reasonably believed the suspect looked guilty A(n) ____ is one in which the defendant admits to the existence of all of the necessary legal elements for criminal liability but offers one or more legally recognized reasons why he or she should nonetheless be acquitted.excusejustificationtrue defenseaffirmative defense A defense based upon a(n) ____ renders lawful conduct that would otherwise constitute a violation of the criminal law. affirmative defensetrue defenseexcusejustification Diminished capacity can be used to describe two circumstances in which a mental condition short of insanity will exonerate the accused or lessen the crime for which he or she is convicted. One of these circumstances is where the accused: can prove pure legal impossibilitycan show that he or she abandoned the crime while still in a sane mental stateraises the condition as a failure of proof defense, negating an element of the crime, a mens rea use of the defenseraises the defense that possession forced him or her to act under duress. Although the right to prevent harm to another is universally recognized as a defense, there are two problem areas: determining the category of persons who can be assisted, and identifying situations in which the person defended did not have a legal right to act in self-defense.determining the category of assailants who can be stopped, and identifying situations in which the persons defended are strong enough to defend themselves.determining the category of crimes that should be prevented, and identifying situations in which the assailants should be treated with lethal force.determining the ways in which police could better handle the situation, and identifying situations in which the assailant's rights could be violatedA defense can mean any set of identifiable conditions or circumstances that may prevent a conviction for an offense.TrueFalse ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download