Course: _______ Year: _______ Quarter: ______F ______W ...
Assessment of External Environment Rubric
| |3: Exceeds Standard |2: Meets Standard |1: Fails to Meet Standard |Score |
|Knowledge and Application of |Identifies and presents in-depth understanding of|Identifies majority of relevant external issues |Limited discussion of external issues; | |
|External (macro-environmental) |macro-environmental issues; |but presents a more limited perspective on them;|Misconstrues issues; | |
|Issues |Effectively critiques issues; |Briefly cites data/information needs; |Shows little or no grasp of macro/external | |
| |Examines inconsistencies. |Recognizes basic content. |issues; |3 2 1 |
| | | |Theory(ies) stated inaccurately; | |
| | | |Cannot recognize basic content. | |
|Conveyance in Meaningful Terms |Ideas presented are always clear without use of |Ideas presented are mostly clear without use of |Ideas presented are frequently unclear. Jargon | |
| |jargon or superficial padding; Essay is well |jargon or superficial padding; Mostly well |and padding are common; Poor organization that | |
| |written and well organized with a compelling |written with a good narrative flow. |makes reading the paper difficult. |3 2 1 |
| |narrative. | | | |
|Development via references, |Essay is consistently developed via outstanding |Good selection of relevant specific references. |Limited to no selection of relevant specific | |
|examples etc. |selection of relevant specific references to | |references. | |
| |source material and examples. | | |3 2 1 |
|Analysis and Evaluation |Identifies salient arguments (reasons and |Sometimes fails to identify relevant arguments; |Fails to identify or hastily dismisses relevant | |
| |claims); Provides |Lack of precision; |arguments; Shows no coherent explanation; | |
| |succinct but thorough explanations; |Insufficient justification for opinions; |Large gaps in reasoning; | |
| |Main arguments are stated; Substantial depth of |Some gaps in exposition. |Answers by rephrasing the question; |3 2 1 |
| |exposition. | |One or two sentence explanations; | |
| | | |No depth of exposition. | |
|Conclusion and Recommend Course of|Justifies key conclusions and explains |Draws conclusions but some are not adequately |Does not justify conclusions or draws faulty | |
|Action |assumptions and reasons. Articulates the |justified; Uses value judgments without |conclusions; Makes conflicting value judgments | |
| |principles and values which underlie the analysis|articulating the principles upon which they are |which undermine the integrity of the conclusion; | |
| |and which lend integrity to the conclusion; |based; |Omits the most basic arguments or overlooks key |3 2 1 |
| |Shows intellectual honesty. |Shows intellectual honesty. |points; | |
| | | |Misrepresents issues; Shows intellectual | |
| | | |dishonesty | |
Scoring Key:
_____ Exceeds Standards: 13 - 15
_____ Meets Standards: 9 - 12
_____ Fails to Meet Standards: ≤ 8
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.