Grade 7 Writing Exemplars with Annotations - Wyoming Department of ...

WY?TOPP

Writing Exemplars ?? 7th Grade

Wyoming Department of Education 122 W. 25th St., Ste. E200 | Cheyenne, WY 82002 P: 307-777-7675 | F: 307-777-6234 | edu.

Grade 7 ELA Writing - Argumentative

Table of Contents

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE.................................................................................................3 PROMPT.................................................................................................................3 INFORMATIONAL TEXT-BASED WRITING RUBRIC..............................................................4-5 SAMPLE STUDENT RESPONSES..............................................................................................6 Sample 1 (S-1) Student Response Score Point 4/3/2 ..............................................................6 Sample 2 (S-2) Student Response Score Point 4/3/2 ..............................................................9 Sample 3 (S-3) Student Response Score Point 3/3/2 ............................................................12 Sample 4 (S-4) Student Response Score Point 3/2/2 ............................................................15 Sample 5 (S-5) Student Response Score Point 2/2/2 ............................................................17 Sample 6 (S-6) Student Response Score Point 2/2/2 ............................................................19 Sample 7 (S-7) Student Response Score Point 2/2/2 ............................................................21 Sample 8 (S-8) Student Response Score Point 2/1/2 ............................................................24 Sample 9 (S-9) Student Response Score Point 1/1/1 ............................................................26

Wyoming Department of Education

2

Grade 7 ELA Writing - Argumentative

BACKGROUND and PURPOSE

The WY-TOPP ELA test has a Writing portion for grades 3, 5, 7, and 9. Each writing test contains one or more passages that relate to a prompt. Students are required to read passages associated with a topic, and then write a response based on a prompt. This type of text-based response requires students to use evidence from the passages as support for their ideas. Students do not answer comprehension questions about the prompt.

The responses in this document were scored and annotated by Wyoming teachers who were trained as human scorers. As a basis for developing a common understanding of the scoring criteria, an annotation follows each response to explain the prominent characteristics of the response described in the rubric. Examples of student responses represent some of the various combinations of the score points across the scoring domains. These responses are not intended to provide a full spectrum of examples for every score point in every domain. On the WY-TOPP ELA test, student responses will be scored by an artificial intelligence (AI) engine that has been designed to predict human responses, based on the WY-TOPP Writing Rubrics. More information about the AI scoring engine is available here.

For more information on the rubrics used to score writing responses on WY-TOPP, visit the WYTOPP website under "WY-TOPP Assessment Blueprints and Rubrics."

PROMPT

Write an essay in which you give your opinion about whether high school should start earlier or later in the day. Use information from the passages in your essay. Manage your time carefully so that you can:

read the passages; plan your response; write your response; and revise and edit your response. Be sure to: include a claim; address counterclaims; use evidence from multiple sources; and avoid overly relying on one source

To view the Grade 7 passage set, click for passage 1 and passage 2.

Wyoming Department of Education

3

ELA Writing Rubrics for WY-TOPP Summative Assessment - Grades 6-10 - Argumentative

Score

4

3

Grades 6-10

Argumentation Writing Rubric

(Score points within each domain include most of the characteristics below)

Purpose, Focus, and Organization

Evidence and Elaboration

(4-point Rubric)

(4-point Rubric)

The response is fully sustained and consistently focused within the purpose, audience, and task; and it has a clear claim and effective organizational structure creating coherence and completeness. The response includes most of the following: Strongly maintained claim with little or no loosely related

material Clearly addressed alternate or opposing claims* Skillful use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the

relationships between and among ideas Logical progression of ideas from beginning to end with a

satisfying introduction and conclusion Appropriate style and tone established and maintained

The response is adequately sustained and generally focused within the purpose, audience, and task; and it has a clear claim and evident organizational structure with a sense of completeness. The response includes most of the following: Maintained claim, though some loosely related material may

be present Alternate or opposing claims included but may not be

completely addressed* Adequate use of a variety of transitional strategies to

clarify the relationships between and among ideas Adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end with a

sufficient introduction and conclusion Appropriate style and tone established

The response provides thorough, convincing, and credible support, citing evidence for the writer's claim that includes the effective use of sources, facts, and details. The response includes most of the following: Smoothly integrated, thorough, and relevant

evidence, including precise references to sources Effective use of a variety of elaborative

techniques to support the claim, demonstrating an understanding of the topic and text Clear and effective expression of ideas, using precise language Academic and domain-specific vocabulary clearly appropriate for the audience and purpose Varied sentence structure, demonstrating language facility

The response provides adequate support, citing evidence for the writer's claim that includes the use of sources, facts, and details. The response includes most of the following: Generally integrated and relevant evidence from

sources, though references may be general or imprecise Adequate use of some elaborative techniques Adequate expression of ideas, employing a mix of precise and general language Domain-specific vocabulary generally appropriate for the audience and purpose Some variation in sentence structure

Conventions of Standard English (2-point Rubric begins at score

point 2)

Continued on the following page

4

ELA Writing Rubrics for WY-TOPP Summative Assessment - Grades 6-10 - Argumentative

Score

Purpose, Focus, and Organization (4-point Rubric)

Evidence and Elaboration (4-point Rubric)

Conventions of Standard English (2-point Rubric)

2 The response is somewhat sustained within the purpose, audience, The response provides uneven, cursory

and task but may include loosely related or extraneous material;

support/evidence for the writer's claim that includes

The response demonstrates an adequate command of basic

and it may have a claim with an inconsistent organizational

partial use of sources, facts, and details. The response conventions. The response may include

structure. The response may include the following:

may include the following:

the following:

Focused claim but insufficiently sustained or unclear

Weakly integrated evidence from sources;

Some minor errors in usage but no

Insufficiently addressed alternate or opposing claims*

erratic or irrelevant references or citations

patterns of errors

Inconsistent use of transitional strategies with little variety

Repetitive or ineffective use of elaborative

Adequate use of punctuation,

Uneven progression of ideas from beginning to end with an inadequate introduction or conclusion

techniques Imprecise or simplistic expression of ideas

capitalization, sentence formation, and spelling

Some use of inappropriate domain-specific

vocabulary

Most sentences limited to simple constructions

1 The response is related to the topic but may demonstrate little or no awareness of the purpose, audience, and task; and it may have

The response provides minimal support/evidence for The response demonstrates a partial the writer's claim, including little if any use of sources, command of basic conventions. The

no discernible claim and little or no discernible organizational

facts, and details. The response may include the

response may include the following:

structure. The response may include the following:

following:

Various errors in usage

Absent, confusing, or ambiguous claim

Minimal, absent, erroneous, or irrelevant

Inconsistent use of correct

Missing alternate or opposing claims*

evidence or citations from the source material

punctuation, capitalization,

Few or no transitional strategies Frequent extraneous ideas that impede understanding

Expression of ideas that is vague, unclear, or confusing

sentence formation, and spelling

Too brief to demonstrate knowledge of focus or organization

Limited and often inappropriate language or domain-specific vocabulary

Sentences limited to simple constructions

0

The response demonstrates a lack of command of conventions, with

frequent and severe errors often

obscuring meaning.

*Not applicable at grade 6

5

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download