Evaluation Summary: Applicant Tracking System 050715-01
[Pages:1]Evaluation Summary
Evaluation Summary: Applicant Tracking System 050715-01
Company Name
1.1 - Did the vendor Provide a brief history of the company acceptable to the evaluator?
1.2 - Did the vendor Provide information in which the company is currently providing or has provided services similar to the ones in this solicitation for k-12, applicant tracking systems and recruitment systems within the past 12-36 months to urban schools in the United States, Including district demographics, acceptable to the evaluator?
1.3 - Did the vendor Provide a list of employees including their responsibilities expected to be assigned to this project, acceptable to the evaluator?
2.1 - Did the Vendor Provide their startup / implementation plan for this project including a timeline that will meet the requirements listed in section 3.20, acceptable to the evaluator? 2.2 - Did the vendor Describe thier reporting capabilities and provide sample reports, acceptable to the evaluator? 2.3 - Did the vendor Describe thier user training that will be provided to APS, including amount and training materials that will be provided, acceptable to the evaluator?
2.4 - Did the vendor Describe thier understanding of the (pre-applicant) Recruitment Management Process, acceptable to the evaluator?
2.5 - Did the vendor Describe in detail thier experience with Lawson conversions and interfaces, acceptable to the evaluator? 2.6 - Did the vendor Describe thier understanding of the ATS Hiring Process, acceptable to the evaluator?
2.7 - Did the vendor Describe thier ability to import mass requisitions into ATS as well as the ability to export mass new-hire records out of ATS through automation, acceptable to the evaluator?
2.8 - Did the vendor Describe how their communication plan will be developed to inform users of new process, acceptable to the evaluator?
2.9 - Did the vendor Describe in detail thier process for data migration, acceptable to the evaluator?
2.10 - Did the vendor Describe their service level agreement framework for the dedicated support representative, acceptable to the evaluator?
2.11 - Did the vendor Describe thier understanding of post-hire onboarding process. acceptable to the evaluator?
3.1 - Did the vendor Provide responses to Mandatory Requirements on APS Attachment 1 ? ATS Technical & Functional Requirements Checklist which is a separate Excel spreadsheet. See Section 3.4 ATS Technical & Functional Requirements, that are acceptable to the evaluator for providing the services requested in this RFP?
3.2 - Did the vendor Provide Responses to Desired and Nice To Have Requirements on APS Attachment 1 ? ATS Technical & Functional Requirements Checklist which is a separate Excel spreadsheet. See Section 3.4 ATS Technical & Functional Requirements, that are acceptable to the evaluator for providing the services requested in this RFP?
Total Technical Pricing Total Evaluation (Technical/Pricing): Average 60.74 Local Preference Vendor Presentation Total Evaluation Score
Points 1
6
3 4 4 4 4 4 4 2
2 4 4 4
20
20
90 10 100 5 50 155
Aasonn 4.64
Teachers Support Network, TSN
451 Solutions
6.32
4.97
Frontline Technologies
5.31
GovernmentJobs. com, Inc. dba NEOGOV
5.32
Hirezon Corporation
3.98
iCIMS, Inc. 3.64
Infor Public Sector, Inc.
4.97
Netchemia
Recommended Vendor
Searchsoft Solutions
TeacherMatch
5.98
6.32
5.98
19.80
31.86
25.86
33.90
19.86
17.82
13.86
27.78
37.92
39.96
33.84
11.91 17.20 15.84 14.52 13.20 10.56 18.56 6.60
5.94 18.56 18.56 18.56
86.00
16.92 21.24 22.60 21.20 23.92 18.56 23.92 10.60
9.94 19.88 19.92 21.20
92.80
14.94 17.20 15.84 15.84 15.84 13.20 15.88 7.92
9.28 14.52 14.56 15.84
72.80
15.96 22.60 21.24 21.24 18.56 21.24 19.88 8.62
9.96 17.20 23.96 14.52
93.00
13.92 17.24 15.88 14.56 15.88 13.20 17.24 8.62
7.28 18.60 17.28 15.92
79.60
9.90 13.20 10.56 11.88 9.24 11.88 9.24 5.94
4.62 9.24 11.88 10.56
59.40
6.93 11.88 11.88 11.88 9.24 15.92 13.20 6.60
5.28 11.88 10.56 11.92
59.60
13.89 19.88 18.56 18.52 15.84 21.24 17.20 9.26
7.26 19.88 15.88 15.84
79.40
17.94 25.28 25.28 23.92 22.56 22.56 25.28 11.28
11.28 22.56 23.92 23.92
126.40
18.96 25.28 21.28 22.56 21.24 22.60 22.56 10.60
10.60 21.20 23.92 21.20
119.60
15.90 15.84 21.24 21.20 19.84 15.84 18.52 7.92
9.26 17.16 18.52 15.84
86.00
79.40
51.41 1.14 52.55 0.00 0.00 52.55
86.20
63.87 3.85 67.72 0.00 0.00 67.72
86.00
51.50 4.41 55.91 0.00 0.00 55.91
93.00
62.88 9.55 72.43 0.00 38.99 111.42
79.40
51.40 2.66 54.06 0.00 0.00 54.06
52.80
36.02 2.70 38.72 0.00 0.00 38.72
59.60
37.70 0.00 37.70 0.00 0.00 37.70
79.20
54.94 2.34 57.28 0.00 0.00 57.28
119.60
77.95 3.61 81.56 0.00 30.38 111.94
106.00
73.41 7.77 81.18 0.00 42.60 123.78
92.60
59.36 9.66 69.02 0.00 0.00 69.02
1
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- principal hiring supervisor s procedure for hiring
- frequently asked questions for frontline
- evaluation summary applicant tracking system 050715 01
- rfp 25 15 applicant tracking system evaluation
- frontline recruiting hiring minot state university
- 4071rfp comprehensive applicant tracking recommendation
- award summary
- diocese of joliet catholic schools frontline applicant
Related searches
- frontline applicant tracking system
- tool tracking system free
- client tracking system software
- overall employee evaluation summary samples
- tool tracking system for construction
- document tracking system excel
- substance abuse tracking system nyc
- employee evaluation summary examples
- time tracking system free
- case management tracking system cmts
- case management tracking system army
- mail tracking system software