I



Appendix

Chapter 1 A-10

Table 1:1 Federal TANF and State Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Expenditures by ACF-196 Spending Category: Comparisons between FY 2010 and FY 2011

Table 1:2 Federal TANF Expenditures on Assistance in FY 2011

Table 1:3 Federal TANF Expenditures on Non-Assistance in FY 2011

Table 1:4 State MOE Expenditures on Assistance in FY 2011

Table 1:5 State MOE Expenditures on Non-Assistance in FY 2011

Table 1:6 State MOE Requirements

Table 1:7 MOE Spending, FY 1997 – FY 2011

Chapter 2 A-18

Table 2:1 AFDC/TANF Average Monthly Caseload, FYs 1960– 2011

Table 2:2 Proportion of Children and Adults in State TANF Caseloads, FY 2011

Table 2:3 Number and Percentage of Eligible Families Participating in the AFDC/TANF Cash Assistance Program: Selected Years

Table 2:4 Number and Percentage of Eligible Households Participating in the Food Stamp Program: Selected Years

Table 2:5 Average Monthly Number of Countable Months Toward the Federal Five-Year Time Limit, FY 2011

Table 2:6 Adherence to the Federal Five-Year Time Limit, FY 2011

Chapter 3 A-24

Table 3:1 Changes in Combined TANF and SSP Work Participation Rates from FY 2009 to FY 2010

Table 3:2 Caseload Reduction Credits FY 2010

Table 3:3 Status of TANF and SSP-MOE Families as Relates to All Families Work Participation Rates FY 2010

Table 3:4 Status of TANF and SSP-MOE Two-Parent Families as Relates to Two-Parent Work Participation Rates FY 2010

Table 3:5 Average Monthly Number of Work-Eligible Individuals Engaged in Work by Work Activity for Families Counted as Meeting the All Families Work Requirements FY 2010

Table 3:6 Average Monthly Percent of Work-Eligible Individuals Participating in Work Activities for a Sufficient Number of Hours for the Family to County as Meeting the All Families Work Requirements FY 2010

Table 3:7 Average Monthly Number of Work-Eligible Parents in Two-Parent Families Who are Participating in Work Activities for a Sufficient Number of Hours for the Family to Count as Meeting the Two-Parent Families Work Requirements FY 2010

Table 3:8 Average Monthly Percent of Work-Eligible Parents in Two-Parent Families Who are Participating in Work Activities for a Sufficient Number of Hours for the Family to Count as Meeting the Two-Parent Families Work Requirements FY 2010

Table 3:9 Average Monthly Number of Work-Eligible Individuals with Hours of Participation in Work Activities FY 2010

Table 3:10 Average Monthly Number of Work-Eligible Individuals with Hours of Participation by Work Activity as a Percent of the Number of Participating Work-Eligible Individuals FY 2010

Table 3:11 Average Monthly Number of Work-Eligible Individuals with Hours of Participation by Work Activity as a Percent of the Total Number of Work-Eligible Individuals FY 2010

Table 3:12 Average Hours of Participation Per Week in Work Activities for All Work-Eligible Individuals Participating in the Work Activity FY 2010

Table 3:13 Number of TANF and SSP-MOE Families Required to Participate in the All Families Work Participation Rate FY 2010

Table 3:14 Percent of Families Required to Participate in All Families Rate FY 2010

Table 3:15 Work Participation Rate Penalties by Year

Chapter 4 A-47

Table 4:1 Labor Force Statistics for Single Mothers Living with Children Under Age 18 by Year, Age of the Youngest Child, and Poverty Status

Table 4:2 Government Benefits and Earnings for Single-Mother Families with Children, FY 2007-2011

Chapter 5 A-49

Table 5:1 Formulas for Computing Rates

Table 5:2 Rates and Ranks of FY 2011 Performance, by Work-Related Measures

Table 5:3 Rates and Ranks of FY 2010 and FY 2011 Performance, by Work Related Measures (in percent)

Table 5:4 Rates and Ranks of Percentage Point Changes in FY 2011 Performance over FY 2010 Performance by Work Related Measures

Table 5:5 Food Stamp Measure: Rates and Ranks of CY 2010 and CY 2009 Performance and Percentage Point Changes of CY 2010 over CY 2009 Performance (in percent)

Table 5:6 Family Formation and Stability Measure: Rates and Ranks of CY 2010 and CY 2009 Performance Rates and Percentage Point Changes of CY 2010 Performance over 2009 (in percent)

Chapter 6

No Appendices

Chapter 7 A-56

Table 7:1 Healthy Marriage Grantees, FY 2011

Table 7:2 Responsible Fatherhood Grantees, FY 2011

Chapter 8 A-60

Table 8:1 Number of Total and Out-of-Wedlock Births in TANF Families for FY 2011 and Change in Net Ratios from FY 2010 to FY 2011

Table 8:2 Number, Rate, and Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women: United States, Selected Years 1960-2010

Table 8:3 Teen Birth Rate, 1970 -2010

Chapter 9 A-63

Table 9:1 Poverty Rate for All Children, Official Poverty 1996-2009 and Selected Years for Comprehensive Measure.

Table 9:2 Combined Methodologies of SAIPE and American Community Survey of State Estimates for Children Under 18 in Poverty for US: 2008 and 2009

Chapter 10 A-65

TANF Families and Households

Table 10:1 Percent Distribution of TANF Households by Number of Persons Living in the Household

Table 10:2 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Number of Recipients

Table 10:3 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Number of Adult Recipients

Table 10:4 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:5 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with No Adults in the Assistance Unit by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:6 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with One Adult by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:7 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with Two or More Adults by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:8 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:9 Percent Distribution of All Adults Living in the Household by the Family Affiliation

Table 10:10 Percent Distribution of TANF Teen Recipients with Teen Parent Status

Table 10:11 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Teen Parents by Relationship to Head of Household

Table 10:12 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with Parents Not In the Assistance Unit

Table 10:13 Percent Distribution of TANF Families Receiving Other Assistance

Table 10:14 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with Receipt of Child Support and with Cash Resources

Table 10:15 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Reason for Grant Reduction

Table 10:16 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Federal Time Limit Exemption Status

Table 10:17 Percent Distribution of Head of Household or Spouse Who Received Assistance by Number of Months Countable toward the Federal Time Limit

Adult Recipients

Table 10:18 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Age Group

Table 10:19 Percent Distribution of TANF Male Adult Recipients by Age Group

Table 10:20 Percent Distribution of TANF Female Adult Recipients by Age Group

Table 10:21 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:22 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Marital Status

Table 10:23 Percent Distribution of TANF Adults Receiving Disability Payments

Table 10:24 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Relationship to the Head of Household

Table 10:25 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Educational Level

Table 10:26 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Citizenship Status

Table 10:27 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Work Exemption Status

Table 10:28 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients Participating in Work Activities

Table 10:29 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Average Weekly Hours Participation in Work Activities

Table 10:30 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Employment Status

Recipient Children

Table 10:31 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Age Group

Table 10:32 Percent Distribution of TANF Male Recipient Children by Age Group

Table 10:33 Percent Distribution of TANF Female Recipient Children by Age Group

Table 10:34 Percent Distribution of TANF Youngest Child Recipient by Age Group

Table 10:35 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:36 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children Receiving Disability Benefits

Table 10:37 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Relationship to the Head of Household

Table 10:38 Percent Distribution of Recipient Children in TANF Families with No Adult Recipients by Relationship to Head of Household

Table 10:39 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Educational Level

Table 10:40 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Citizenship Status

Financial Circumstances

Table 10:41 TANF Families Receiving Cash Assistance by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:42 TANF Families with No Adult Recipients Receiving Cash Assistance

Table 10:43 TANF Families with Income by Type of Non-TANF Income

Table 10:44 TANF Adult Recipients with Income by Type of Non-TANF Income

Table 10:45 TANF Recipient Children with Unearned Income

Closed Cases

Table 10:46 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Reason for Closure

Table 10:47 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Number of Family Members

Table 10:48 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:49 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:50 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families that Received Other Assistance

Table 10:51 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by Age Group

Table 10:52 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Recipient Children by Age Group

Table 10:53 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Youngest Child Recipient by Age Group

Table 10:54 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by Marital Status

Table 10:55 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by Educational Level

Table 10:56 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by Employment Status

Table 10:57 TANF Closed-Case Families with Income by Type of Non-TANF Income

SSP-MOE Recipients

Table 10:58 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families by Number of Family Members

Table 10:59 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:60 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families by Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:61 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families Receiving Assistance

Table 10:62 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Age Group

Table 10:63 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Marital Status

Table 10:64 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Educational Level

Table 10:65 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Work Participation Status

Table 10:66 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Citizenship Status

Table 10:67 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Employment Status

Table 10:68 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipient Participating in Work Activities

Table 10:69 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Recipient Children by Age Group

Table 10:70 SSP-MOE Families Receiving Cash Assistance and Average Monthly Amount by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:71 SSP-MOE Families with Income by Type of Non-SSP Income

Reliability of Estimates

Table 10:72 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Closed Case Families by Reason for Closure

Table 10:73 Percent by Which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary From True Value at the 95 Percent Confidence Level

Table 10:74 Fraction and Percent by Which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary From True Value at the 95 Percent Confidence Level

Table 10:75 Approximate Standard Error of Estimated Percentages of TANF Recipient Families

Table 10:76 Significant Differences for Percentage Values between the United States and States with Samples of 3,000

Table 10:77 Significant Differences for Percentage Values between States with Samples of 3,000

Chapter 11 A-137

Table 11:1 Grant Amounts Allocated or Awarded to American Indian Entities Administering a Federal TANF or NEW Program, FY 2011

Table 11:2 Estimated TANF Cases with an American Indian in the Assistance Unit FY 2009 – FY 2011

Table 11:3 Tribal TANF Program: Adults by Type of Relationship to Head of Household, FY 2004 – FY 2008

Table 11:4 Tribal TANF Program: Families by Type of Family Receiving Assistance FY 2004 – FY 2008

Table 11:5 Tribal TANF Program: Age of Children in the TANF Family, FY 2004 – FY 2008

Table 11:6 Native Employment Works (NEW), Number of Adult Males, Adult Females, Youth Males, Youth Females, and Total Clients Served

Table 11:7 Native Employment Works (NEW) Clients Entering Unsubsidized Employment, and Clients Receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and General Assistance (GA)

Table 11:8 Native Employment Works (NEW), Clients Receiving Supportive and Job Retention Services

Table 11:9 Native Employment Works (NEW) Clients Participating in Work Activities and Training

Chapter 12

No appendices

Chapter 13

No appendices

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

Table 2:3 Number and Percentage of Eligible Families Participating in the AFDC/TANF Cash Assistance Program: Selected Years

|Calendar Year |Eligible Families |Participating Families |Participation Rate |

| |(millions) |(millions) |(percent) |

|1981 |4.78 |3.84 |80.2 |

|1983 |4.75 |3.69 |77.7 |

|1985 |4.67 |3.70 |79.3 |

|1987 |4.92 |3.78 |76.7 |

|1988 |4.78 |3.75 |78.4 |

|1989 |4.54 |3.80 |83.6 |

|1990 |4.93 |4.06 |82.2 |

|1992 |5.64 |4.83 |85.7 |

|1993 |6.14 |5.01 |81.7 |

|1994 (revised) |6.13 |5.03 |82.1 |

|1995 |5.69 |4.80 |84.3 |

|1996 |5.62 |4.43 |78.9 |

|1997 (adjusted) |5.41 |3.74 |69.2 |

|1998 (adjusted) |5.47 |3.05 |55.8 |

|1999 |5.07 |2.65 |52.3 |

|2000 |4.44 |2.30 |51.8 |

|2001 |4.56 |2.19 |48.0 |

|2002 |4.55 |2.19 |48.1 |

|2003 |4.77 |2.18 |45.7 |

|2004 |5.22 |2.19 |42.0 |

|2005 |5.27 |2.13 |40.4 |

|2006 |5.35 |2.08 |39.0 |

|2007 |5.31 |1.91 |36.0 |

|2008 |5.16 |1.70 |33.0 |

|2009 |5.69 |1.84 |32.3 |

| | | | |

Note: AFDC/TANF participation rates are estimated by an Urban Institute model (TRIM3) that uses CPS data to simulate AFDC/TANF eligibility and participation for an average month, by calendar year. There have been small changes in estimating methodology over time, due to model improvements and revisions to the CPS. Most notably, since 1994 the model has been revised to more accurately estimate SSI participation among children, and in 1997 and 1998 the model was adjusted to more accurately exclude ineligible immigrants. In contrast to editions prior to 2004, this table includes families receiving assistance under Separate State Programs (SSPs). Note that families subject to full-family sanctions are counted as nonparticipating eligible families due to modeling limitations. Although the coverage rate estimates take into account the number of families who lost aid due to the time limit (and do not count such families in the denominator of the coverage rate estimate), they do not make any allowance for families staying off of TANF to conserve their time-limited assistance months. Also, the numbers of eligible and participating families include the territories and pregnant women without children, even though these two small groups are excluded from the TRIM model. The numbers shown here implicitly assume that participation rates for the territories and for pregnant women with no other children are the same as for all other eligibles. In 2004 the methods for identifying potential child-only units capture the fact that non-parent caretakers generally have a choice of whether or not to be included in the TANF unit. TRIM now excludes those caretakers whose income would make the unit ineligible, increasing the number of potential child-only units.

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, caseload tabulations and unpublished tabulations

Table 2:4 Number and Percentage of Eligible Households Participating in the Food Stamp Program: Selected Years

|Date |Eligible Households |Participating Households |Participation Rate |

| |(millions) |(millions) |(percent) |

|September 1976 |16.28 |5.31 |32.6 |

|February 1978 |13.98 |5.29 |37.8 |

|August 1980 |14.04 |7.37 |52.5 |

|August 1982 |14.54 |7.49 |51.5 |

|August 1984 |14.19 |7.32 |51.6 |

|August 1986 |15.27 |7.10 |46.5 |

|August 1988 |14.90 |7.02 |47.1 |

|August 1990 |14.52 |7.97 |54.9 |

|August 1991 |15.57 |9.20 |59.1 |

|August 1992 |16.63 |10.24 |61.6 |

|August 1993 |17.03 |10.90 |64.0 |

|August 1994 |17.04 |11.01 |64.6 |

|September 1994 (revised) |15.31 |10.66 |69.6 |

|September 1995 |14.99 |10.37 |69.2 |

|888September 1996 |15.26 |9.93 |65.1 |

|September 1997 |14.69 |8.45 |57.5 |

|September 1998 |14.02 |7.61 |54.2 |

|September 1999 |13.72 |7.28 |53.0 |

|Fiscal Year 1999 |14.51 |7.48 |51.6 |

|Fiscal Year 2000 |14.24 |7.15 |50.2 |

|Fiscal Year 2001 |15.11 |7.25 |48.0 |

|Fiscal Year 2002 |16.69 |7.95 |47.6 |

|Fiscal Year 2003 |17.07 |8.89 |52.1 |

|Fiscal Year 2004 |17.49 |9.99 |57.1 |

|Fiscal Year 2005 |17.73 |10.74 |60.6 |

|Fiscal Year 2006 |17.12 |11.19 |65.3 |

|Fiscal Year 2007 |17.45 |11.43 |65.5 |

|Fiscal Year 2008 |17.99 |12.30 |68.4 |

|Fiscal Year 2009 |20.33 |14.69 |72.2 |

| | | | |

Note: Food Stamp Eligible households are estimated from a Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. model that uses CPS data to simulate the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). SNAP caseload data are from USDA, FNS program operations caseload data. There have been small changes in the methodology over time, due to model improvements and revisions to the CPS. Notably, the model was revised in 1994 to produce more accurate and lower estimates of eligible households. The estimates for previous years show higher estimates of eligibles and lower participation rates relative to the revised estimate for 1994 and estimates for subsequent years. The two estimates for 1999 are due to re-weighting of the March 2000 – 2003 CPS files to Census 2000 and revised methodologies for determining food stamp eligibility. The original estimate (September 1999) is consistent methodologically with estimates from September 1994 – September 1998, while the revised estimate (FY 1999) is consistent with the estimates for FY 2000 – FY 2006.

Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Trends in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates:

Fiscal Year 2002 to Fiscal Year 2009 available online at fns.ora/MENU/Published/SNAP/FILES/Participation/Trends2002-09.pdf.

• [pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

| |Table 4:2 | |

| | | |

|Government Benefits and Earnings for Single-Mother Families with Children in 2011 Dollars |

| |Fiscal Years 2007 - 2011 | |

| | | |

| |Quintile |2007 |

| |Quintile |2007 |

| | | |

| | | |

| |Note: Sorted into quintiles by comprehensive income divided by poverty line | | | |

| |Income estimated for persons with top-coded income | | | | |

| |Persons with negative income removed | | | | | |

| |Numbers are averages within each quintile | | | | |

| |Source: ASPE Calculations from Census Bureau Current Population Survey data (2007-2012) | |

| |

|Legal Name Organization |City |State |Award Amount |

|Auburn University |Auburn |AL |$2,489,548 |

|Healthy You, Inc. |Dothan |AL |$681,956 |

|John Brown University |Siloam Springs |AR |$724,428 |

|Arizona Youth Partnerships |Tucson |AZ |$634,536 |

|Creciendo Unidos |Phoenix |AZ |$359,796 |

|Cambodian Association of America |Long Beach |CA |$570,000 |

|The Dibble Institute for Marriage Education |Kensington |CA |$794,846 |

|Sacramento Healthy Marriage Project |Sacramento |CA |$798,825 |

|Office of Samoan Affairs of California |Los Angeles |CA |$685,308 |

|Imperial Valley Regional Occupational Program |El Centro |CA |$799,000 |

|Healthy Relationships California |Leucadia |CA |$2,500,000 |

|The Center for Relationship Education |Denver |CO |$1,605,705 |

|Jewish Family & Children's Service of Sarasota-Manatee |Sarasota  |FL |$799,993 |

|University of Central Florida |Orlando |FL |$2,184,508 |

|Recapturing the Vision |Miami |FL |$799,230 |

|Project S.O.S., Inc. |Jacksonville |FL |$672,703 |

|Bethany Christian Services of Georgia, Inc. |Atlanta |GA |$799,996 |

|More Than Conquerors, Inc. |Lithonia |GA |$798,798 |

|Future Foundation, Inc. |East Point |GA |$685,000 |

|Keiki O Ka Ana Preschool, Inc. |Honolulu |HI |$798,752 |

|SGA Youth & Family Services |Chicago |IL |$794,180 |

|Meier Clinics Foundation |Wheaton |IL |$2,500,000 |

|Community Marriage Builders |Evansville |IN |$799,999 |

|Fathers and Families Resource/Research Center, Inc. |Indianapolis |IN |$1,780,000 |

|Catholic Charities, Inc. |Witchita |KS |$1,445,587 |

|Kentucky River Foothills Development Council |Richmond |KY |$799,999 |

|Multi-Purpose Community Action Agency |Shelbyville |KY |$344,904 |

|Starkville School District |Starkville |MS |$699,874 |

|Family Resource Center of Raleigh, Inc. |Raleigh |NC |$725,000 |

|Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton |Trenton |NJ |$555,300 |

|Regents of New Mexico State University |Las Cruces |NM |$799,999 |

|Shalom Taskforce |New York |NY |$541,633 |

|University Behavioral Associates |Bronx |NY |$799,999 |

|Phoenix Houses of New York, Inc. |New York |NY |$618,768 |

|Marriage Resource Center of Miami Valley |Springfield |OH |$798,380 |

|Toledo Area Ministries |Toledo |OH |$799,999 |

|Elizabeth's New Life Center |Dayton |OH |$2,500,000 |

|Beech Acres Parenting Center |Cincinnati |OH |$799,999 |

|Operation Keepsake, Inc. |Twinsburg |OH |$798,054 |

|Table7:1 Healthy Marriage Grantees, FY 2011 (Continued) |

|Legal Name Organization |City |State |Award Amount |

|Oklahoma Department of Human Services |Oklahoma City |OK |$776,304 |

|Youth & Family Services |El Reno |OK |$338,367 |

|Public Strategies, Inc. |Oklahoma City |OK |$2,500,000 |

|Northwest Family Services |Portland |OR |$1,395,000 |

|Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization |Portland |OR |$492,000 |

|Family Guidance, Inc. |Sweickley |PA |$1,163,684 |

|Community Prevention Partnership of Berks County |Reading |PA |$787,665 |

|Children's Aid Society of Clearfield County |Clearfield |PA |$354,714 |

|First Things First |Chattanooga |TN |$1,070,834 |

|The University of Tennessee |Knoxville |TN |$723,508 |

|Alliance for N. Texas Healthy and Effective Marriages (ANTHEM) |Dallas |TX |$723,508 |

|Texas State University |San Marcos |TX |$617,280 |

|Family Servcie Center of Houston and Harris County |Houston |TX |$698,102 |

|El Paso Center for Children, Inc. |El Paso |TX |$799,945 |

|Avance - Houston, Inc. |Houston |TX |$799,999 |

|The Parenting Center |Ft. Worth |TX |$797,093 |

|Utah State University |Logan |UT |$785,612 |

|Granato Counseling Services, Inc. |Vienna |VA |$799,599 |

|ICF Incorporated, LLC (NRCSPHM) |Fairfax |VA |$1,500,000 |

|Center for Self-Sufficiency |Shorewood |WI |$1,779,393 |

|Mission West Virginia |Hurricane |WV |$683,935 |

|High Country Consulting, LLC dba Faith Initiatives of Wyoming |Cheyenne |WY |$535,082 |

|Total Award Amount |  |  |$59,997,077 |

 

| |

|Table 7:2 Responsible Fatherhood Grantees, FY 2011 |

| |

| | | | |

|Legal Name Organization |City |State |Award Amount |

|Cook Inlet Tribal Council |Anchorage |AK |$800,000 |

|Alabama Department of Finance |Montgomery |AL |$2,500,000 |

|Children's Institute Inc. |Los Angeles |CA |$2,500,000 |

|Fresno County Economic Oppt Commission |Fresno |CA |$782,002 |

|Imperial Valley Regional Occupational Program |El Centro |CA |$798,928 |

|The East Los Angeles Community Union (TELACU) |Los Angeles |CA |$799,999 |

|Social Advocates for Youth San Diego |San Diego |CA |$790,927 |

|Friends Outside in Los Angeles County |Pasedena |CA |$518,067 |

|Children's Hospital Los Angeles |Los Angeles |CA |$784,521 |

|Archuleta County Department of Human Services |Pagosa Spring |CO |$442,291 |

|County of Montrose |Montrose |CO |$574,524 |

|Catholic Charities, Inc. Arch. Of Hartford |Hartford |CT |$800,000 |

|National Organization of Concerned Black Men |Washington |DC |$799,999 |

|Healthy Families/Thriving Communities |Washington |DC |$1,533,518 |

|Jewish Family & Children's Service of Sarasota-Manatee |Sarasota |FL |$799,984 |

|Mid-Iowa Community Action, Inc. |Marshalltown |IA |$765,433 |

|McDermott Center dba Haymarket Center |Chicago |IL |$796,393 |

|Springfield Urban League, Inc. |Springfield |IL |$1,387,327 |

|Gateway Community Services Organization |West Liberty |KY |$799,999 |

|Council on Prevention & Eductaion (COPES) |Louisville |KY |$549,673 |

|Lexington Leadership Foundation |Lexington |KY |$449,113 |

|Supportive Integrated Services |Shreveport |LA |$537,537 |

|Oakland Livingston Human Services Agency |Pontiac |MI |$432,251 |

|Urban Ventures Leadership Foundation |Minneapolis |MN |$709,385 |

|Goodwill Industries, Inc. |Saint Paul |MN |$1,772,546 |

|Father's Support Center St. Louis, Inc. |St. Louis |MO |$1,530,190 |

|Connection to Success |Kansas City |MO |$702,553 |

|Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes |Pablo |MT |$2,440,131 |

|New Jersey Department of Corrections (Re-Entry) |Trenton |NJ |$1,039,049 |

|PB&J Family Services, Inc (Re-Entry) |Albequrque |NM |$1,476,500 |

|Structured Employment Economic Dev. Corp |New York |NY |$2,500,000 |

|EAC, Inc. |Hempstead |NY |$533,040 |

|Retreat, Inc. |East Hampton |NY |$786,000 |

|Chautauqua Opportunities, Inc. |Dunkirk |NY |$618,031 |

|Family Services of Westchester, Inc. |Port Chester |NY |$543,906 |

|The Fortune Society, Inc. |Long Island  |NY |$725,000 |

| |

|Table 7:2 Responsible Fatherhood Grantees, FY 2011 (Continued) |

| | | | |

|Legal Name Organization |City |State |Award Amount |

|WSOS Community Action Commission, Inc. |Fremont |OH |$560,000 |

|The RIDGE Project, Inc. (Re-Entry) |Defiance |OH |$1,500,000 |

|The RIDGE Project, Inc. |Defiance |OH |$2,500,000 |

|Employment Opportunity Training Center  |Scranton |PA |$379,755 |

|People for People, Inc. |Philadelphia |PA |$648,273 |

|Goodwill Industries of Southwestern PA |Pittsburgh |PA |$799,952 |

|Children's Friend and Service |Providence |RI |$735,527 |

|Lutheran Social Service of South Dakota (Re-Entry) |Sioux Falls |SD |$1,229,141 |

|Douglas-Cherokee Economic Authority |Morristown |TN |$416,063 |

|Shelby County Government |Memphis |TN |$797,809 |

|Metro Nashville Public Health Department |Nashville |TN |$1,589,107 |

|Goodwill Industries of Central Texas |Austin |TX |$623,965 |

|Southwest Key Programs, Inc. |Austin |TX |$799,594 |

|Horizon Outreach |Spring |TX |$480,732 |

|Tarrant County Workforce Dev. Brd |Ft.Worth |TX |$2,106,804 |

|Youth and Family Alliance dba LifeWorks |Austin |TX |$600,000 |

|Child & Family Services of Eastern VA |Norfolk |VA |$471,156 |

|Total Action Against Poverty/Roanoke Valley |Roanoke  |VA |$766,515 |

|Visiting Nurse Association of Chittendon |Colchester |VT |$390,600 |

|Northwest Marriage Institute |Vancouver |WA |$747,281 |

|Milwaukee County Dept. of Child Support |Milwaukee |WI |$1,806,892 |

|ADVOCAP, Inc. |Fund du Lac |WI |$776,994 |

|Kanawha Institute for Social Research (KISRA) |Dunbar |WV |$2,351,675 |

|Total Award Amount |  |  |$59,396,652 |

 

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

Table 11: 2

American Indian Families Served by State TANF Programs

and Tribal TANF Caseloads, FY 2009 – FY 2011

|Fiscal Year |2009 |2010 |2011 |

|American Indian Families served|22,445 |22,166 |18,642 |

|by State TANF Programs | | | |

|Average Monthly Tribal TANF |14,065 |15,941 |15,727 |

|Caseload | | | |

Sources: State TANF Caseload Data; Tribal TANF Database

[pic]

[pic]

[pic]

Table 11:6

[pic]

Table 11:7 [pic]

Table 11:8 [pic]

[pic]

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download