Facility Names Committee Final Report
Facility Names Committee Final Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Goose Creek CISD¡¯s Facilities Names Committee met for the first time November 30, 2020. The 42member committee was charged with providing recommendations to the Goose Creek CISD board
of trustees regarding policy for naming or renaming facilities and which facilities, if any, should be
considered for renaming. The current policy was established in CW (LOCAL). The committee met
five times over the course of three months, and concluded the fifth meeting on February 22nd.
Thomas Parent was selected as the chairperson for this committee. Tony Resendez, an attorney with
Walsh Gallegos, assumed the role of Facilities Names Committee facilitator. The Facility Names
Committee has been charged with five specific outcomes, which are included in this report to the
school board.
COMMITTEE OUTCOMES
OUTCOME #1: Develop a pros/cons list for renaming/not renaming a facility.
The Committee generated a list of pros and cons for renaming or not renaming a facility at the 2nd
meeting. After the 3rd meeting, the committee completed a survey to identify the top pros and cons.
The results were shared with the Committee during the 4th meeting. Below is the list of pros and
cons for renaming a facility.
?
Highest Ranked ¡°Pros¡± for Renaming a facility: Inclusivity, Progress, Local Historical
Achievements (name after local individuals), Respect
?
Other ¡°Pros¡± listed for Renaming a facility: New Beginning, Building New Traditions, Remove
Stigma, Town Pride, Reputation, Social Acceptance, Better name, Awareness, Honoring
Someone, Historical Enlightenment, Acknowledgment, Righting wrongs, Morale of students, Set
a precedence, Showing compromise and unity (as a committee), Old vs. New/Young vs. Old
?
Highest Ranked ¡°Cons¡± for Renaming a facility: Cost/Use of funds, Financial impact of
families/boosters, Perception that something is wrong, Loss of tradition
?
Other ¡°Cons¡± listed for Renaming a facility: Loss of power, Loss of unique ID, Confusion of
judgment, Peer pressure, Lack of education, Interruption during transition, Dividing town,
Changing culture of school, Logistics, School choice, Acceptance of incorrect info, Loss of
GOOSE CREEK CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
4544 Interstate 10 East ? Baytown, TX 77521
scholarship money, Loss of historical marker, Town pride, Morale of students, If you start, where
do you stop? (one school or all schools?), Set a precedence, Dividing students, Adults creating
problems for students, Identity, Creating confusion, Structure, Feeling displaced, Consistency,
Old vs. New/Young vs. Old
OUTCOME #2: Provide an estimate on a facility name change, including options and a draft
timeline for phasing in a new name.
The Committee received a presentation from district personnel, including the Director of
Construction, to review the costs associated with changing a school facility. The estimated cost to
rename an elementary school is $15,500-$54,450 per school. A facility cost estimate breakdown was
also provided to the Committee, which included the following: Marquee updates, Mural removal,
Floor logo replacement, interior and exterior building graphics, and miscellaneous. Specific items
would depend on the individual school. The estimated cost to rename a junior school is $63,500 ¨C
$130,000 per school. In addition to the items listed for elementary schools, the following may also
apply to a junior school: gym wall graphics, score board panel replacement, athletic uniforms, and
fine arts uniforms. The estimated cost to rename a high school is $142,500 - $470,050 per school. In
addition to elementary and junior school items above, the following may also apply to a high
school: turf field updates, additional athletic uniforms, and additional fine arts uniforms. The
Committee asked questions and engaged in a discussion about facility costs based on this
information. The cost window would be specified in the event that the school board elected to
rename a facility.
OUTCOME #3: Proposed recommendations or changes (if any) regarding future decisions
about the facility naming process, parameters, and policy.
The Committee reviewed school board policy regarding the naming or renaming of a facility (CW
Local) during the 1st meeting and revisited the policy during the 4th meeting. The Committee then
reviewed various naming parameters and processes from other school board policies throughout
Texas and beyond. The Committee identified which policies should be recommended to the school
board to consider. Committee members voted on each criteria.
GOOSE CREEK CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
4544 Interstate 10 East ? Baytown, TX 77521
Below is a list of these criteria and the voting outcome for each item:
1. GCCISD policy states that a district facility should be named for a deceased person who has
attained prominence locally or nationally. Do you believe this policy should be revised or
changed in any way?
YES-59% NO-41%
2. Should the GCCISD policy allow for facilities to be named after geographic areas, landmarks, or
physical attributes?
YES-88% NO-12%
3. Should the GCCISD policy allow for facilities to be named after the instructional focus or
aspirations of the school?
YES-88% NO-12%
4. Should the GCCISD policy continue to allow for facilities to be named after individual people?
YES-69% NO-31%
5. Should the GCCISD policy allow for considerations of living persons?
YES-29% NO-71%
6. Should the GCCISD policy require that the individual be affiliated or associated with the local
district or community?
YES-47% NO-53%
7. Do you believe that GCCISD policy should include the following: The individual¡¯s principal
legacy (i.e. the key activity, advocacy or accomplishment for which the individual is most known)
aligns with or reflects the district¡¯s mission, vision, and core values and beliefs?
YES-72% NO-28%
8. Do you believe that GCCISD policy should include the following: School/facility names should
consider the diverse community that they serve?
YES-70% NO-30%
9. Do you believe that GCCISD policy include the following: The name must not already be in use
by another District school or facility?
YES-88% NO-12%
10. GCCISD policy states that ¡°the person must have made a significant contribution to society and
his/her name should lend prestige and status to the school.¡± Do you believe this policy should
be revised or expanded?
YES-56% NO-44%
GOOSE CREEK CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
4544 Interstate 10 East ? Baytown, TX 77521
OUTCOME #4: Proposed list of facilities that should or should not be considered for
renaming.
After the 4th committee meeting, members were given an online survey to identify which facilities
should be considered for discussion with potential renaming recommendations from the
committee. It was determined that if four or more committee members selected a specific facility,
then it would be discussed and voted on by committee members during the following meeting.
Committee members who selected a facility for discussion were instructed to be prepared to
present a case on why that facility would meet criteria to be renamed. Members were given the
opportunity to either not provide feedback, submit written feedback, participate in a group, or lead
a presentation. This process resulted in 11 facilities that were selected for discussion purposes.
Presentations were provided by committee members during the fifth committee meeting.
?
?
?
?
?
?
San Jacinto Elementary and Banuelos Elementary each received four votes. No committee
members volunteered to be a spokesperson and no written feedback was submitted for
either facility.
Alamo Elementary received four votes; Bowie Elementary, Crockett Elementary, and Travis
Elementary received six votes; Austin Elementary and Ashbel Smith Elementary received
seven votes. Presentations were given for and against the renaming of these six facilities
during the fifth meeting.
Green Center received 10 votes. A presentation was given for this facility during the fifth
meeting. There was not a presentation against the renaming of this facility.
Sterling High School received 11 votes. Presentations were given for and against the
renaming of this facility during the fifth meeting.
Lee High School received 18 votes. Presentations were given for and against the renaming of
this facility during the fifth meeting.
Eighteen committee members selected ¡°no¡± to renaming most or all facilities.
An online survey was made available during February 4-14th. Community members, staff members,
and high school students were invited to participate in the survey to provide feedback to the
committee. The survey questions and responses from each target audience is summarized below:
Participation Rate
Community members that live in GCCISD district boundaries: 2,327 (3% of pop)
Staff members: 696 (18% of pop)
High school students: 3,421 (51% of pop)
GOOSE CREEK CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
4544 Interstate 10 East ? Baytown, TX 77521
Questions and Summarized Results
1. Do you feel there is a need to change the name(s) of one ore more facilities in Goose Creek
CISD?
Audience
Community
Staff
HS Students
Yes
19%
24%
18%
No
72%
61%
52%
No preference
9%
15%
30%
2. Which facility name(s) should be changed? The five facilities with the most selections are
listed below, along with the number of individuals that selected the facility per targeted
audience.
Community Results
Lee High School
Sterling High School
Smith Elementary
Austin Elementary
Bowie Elementary
Number/Percentage Selected Per Facility
418 (18%)
117 (5%)
55
(2%)
53
(2%)
52
(2%)
Staff Results
Lee High School
Sterling High School
Austin Elementary
Smith Elementary
Bowie Elementary
Number Selected Per Facility
163 (23%)
44
(6%)
21
(3%)
20
(3%)
19
(3%)
Student Results
Lee High School
Sterling High School
Horace Mann
Goose Creek Memorial
Austin Elementary
Number Selected Per Facility
475 (14%)
113 (3%)
57
(2%)
55
(2%)
49
(1%)
GOOSE CREEK CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
4544 Interstate 10 East ? Baytown, TX 77521
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- course description guide for 2021 2022
- gcm cheer booster club baytown texas by laws
- uil reclassification and realignment 2020 2022
- prepare early for back to school vaccines
- goose creek memorial high school 2021 summer boys girls
- robert e lee high school the portal to texas history
- for the class of 2025
- in the united states district court for the southern
- academy name district esc
- process for approval to observe in goose creek cisd
Related searches
- nyc council committee chairs
- supreme committee for qatar 2022
- supreme committee for delivery and legacy
- new house committee chairs
- fun committee survey questions
- monthly facility management report sample
- final cost report nysed
- project final report template
- project final summary report template
- final grant report sample
- final grant report example
- final evaluation report example