No

(Rp. 2) For the marijuana in his shoe, he was convicted of one count of possession of up to one-half ounce of marijuana in violation of § 90-95(d)(4) and one count of possession of marijuana in violation of § 90-95(e)(9). (Rpp. 8-9) However, the State’s evidence established that all three counts arose from a single continuous act of possession. ................
................