Systematic Evidence Review - Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.
AHRQ is the lead Federal agency charged with supporting research designed to improve the quality of health care, reduce its cost, address patient safety and medical errors, and broaden access to essential services. AHRQ sponsors and conducts research that provides evidence-based information on health care outcomes; quality; and cost, use, and access. The information helps health care decisionmakers-- patients and clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers--make more informed decisions and improve the quality of health care services.
System atic Evidence R eview
Number 12
Hormone Replacement Therapy and Osteoporosis
Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2101 East Jefferson Street Rockville, MD 20852
Contract No. 290-97-0018 Task Order No. 2 Technical Support of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Prepared by: Oregon Health Sciences University Evidence-based Practice Center, Portland, Oregon
Heidi D. Nelson, MD, MPH
August 2002
Preface
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) sponsors the development of Systematic Evidence Reviews (SERs) through its Evidence-based Practice Program. With guidance from the third U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and input from Federal partners and primary care specialty societies, two Evidence-based Practice Centers--one at the Oregon Health Sciences University and the other at Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina--systematically review the evidence of the effectiveness of a wide range of clinical preventive services, including screening, counseling, immunizations, and chemoprevention, in the primary care setting. The SERs--comprehensive reviews of the scientific evidence on the effectiveness of particular clinical preventive services--serve as the foundation for the recommendations of the third USPSTF, which provide age- and risk-factorspecific recommendations for the delivery of these services in the primary care setting. Details of the process of identifying and evaluating relevant scientific evidence are described in the "Methods" section of each SER.
The SERs document the evidence regarding the benefits, limitations, and cost-effectiveness of a broad range of clinical preventive services and will help to further awareness, delivery, and coverage of preventive care as an integral part of quality primary health care.
AHRQ also disseminates the SERs on the AHRQ Web site () and disseminates summaries of the evidence (summaries of the SERs) and recommendations of the third USPSTF in print and on the Web. These are available through the AHRQ Web site (), through the National Guideline Clearinghouse (), and in print through the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse (1-800-358-9295).
We welcome written comments on this SER. Comments may be sent to: Director, Center for Practice and Technology Assessment, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 6010 Executive Blvd., Suite 300, Rockville, MD 20852.
Carolyn M. Clancy, M.D. Acting Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Robert Graham, M.D. Director, Center for Practice and
Technology Assessment Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
The USPSTF is an independent panel of experts in primary care and prevention first convened by the U.S. Public Health Service in 1984. The USPSTF systematically reviews the evidence on the effectiveness of providing clinical preventive services--including screening, counseling, immunization, and chemoprevention--in the primary care setting. AHRQ convened the third USPSTF in November 1998 to update existing Task Force recommendations and to address new topics.
iii
The authors of this report are responsible for its content. Statements in the report should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services of a particular drug, device, test, treatment, or other clinical service.
iv
Structured Abstract
Context: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is widely used to prevent osteoporosis and fractures. Objective: To systematically review and evaluate studies of the use of estrogen and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to prevent bone loss and fractures in healthy postmenopausal women. Data Sources: Studies with English language abstracts identified in MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, and Cochrane Library databases from 1994 to May 2001. Reference lists of key articles and meta-analyses were also reviewed. Study Selection: Only randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were included. Data Extraction: Studies meeting inclusion criteria were formally abstracted and quality was rated using criteria developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data Synthesis: For bone density outcomes, randomized controlled trials consistently indicated improved bone density with estrogen use. These findings were similar between prevention and treatment trials, opposed and unopposed regimens, oral and transdermal forms of estrogen, and types of progestins. For fracture outcomes, 5 randomized controlled trials of estrogen were identified and none met criteria to be ranked as a goodquality study. A primary prevention trial indicated a significant decrease in risk of nonvertebral fractures in 1 of 2 estrogen arms. None of the other trials indicated a significant risk reduction with estrogen, but all had important methodologic limitations. A recent meta-analysis of 22 trials of estrogen, many with unpublished data, reported an overall 27% reduction in nonvertebral fractures (relative risk [RR], 0.73; confidence
v
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- last review status date fep blue
- hormone dosing restorative medicine
- menopausal hormone replacement therapy and risk of ovarian cancer jama
- healthcare inspection testosterone replacement therapy initiation and
- select the required information bayer
- patient teaching aid
- a practical guide to prescribing hormone replacement therapy
- the 2022 hormone therapy position statement of the north american
- hormonal replacement in hypopituitarism in adults endocrine society
- bias file 1 the rise and fall of hormone replacement therapy teachepi
Related searches
- evidence based strategies for teaching
- research topics for healthcare students
- healthcare research topic ideas
- healthcare research topics
- healthcare research papers
- research topics for healthcare administration
- evidence based practice for nurses
- healthcare research study articles
- evidence based interventions for reading
- evidence based treatment for psychosis
- kpi for research and development
- agency for social protection seychelles