DATE



|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|10-Jan-84 |Prowler on the property |Not known |Constable |Prowler at plaintiff’s bedroom window at midnight. | |

| | | |Rastonich | | |

|23-Jan-85 | |Not Known | |Plaintiff requests to see the Assistant Commissioner of Police | |

| | | | |for failure of Police to provide any information to complaints. | |

|13-May-86 |Threats of Violence |Not known |Ponsonby Police |A short time after the plaintiff had moved into Moa Road her |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | | |cat strayed off the property to that of her immediate neighbour | |

| | | | |at 84 Moa Road Mr Roger. The plaintiff’s cat walked on some wet | |

| | | | |cement. Mr Rogers kicked the plaintiff’s cat away with his work | |

| | | | |boot. The cat was injured and distressed and the plaintiff’s son| |

| | | | |Karl came over to rush it to the vet. The cat haemorrhaged from | |

| | | | |the lungs from the kick he sustained and died that night. | |

| | | | |On this later occasion Mr Rogers' children were trespassing and | |

| | | | |throwing cardboard cartons into the plaintiff’s yard and the | |

| | | | |plaintiff’s son Anthony went to his door to discuss this with | |

| | | | |him. Mr Rogers became very angry and ordered the plaintiff and | |

| | | | |her son off the property. He threatened to shoot the | |

| | | | |plaintiff’s son and grazed him across the face as he took a | |

| | | | |swipe at him. He referred to the plaintiff as a "Red Headed | |

| | | | |Whore". | |

|23-Aug-86 |Obscene Language |860824/8477 |unknown | |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|5-Sep-86 | Complaint |860824/84 |A H Snaith 3872 |Refer to Police report |REFUSED TO TAKE ACTION- made defamatory comments |

| | | | | |about the Plaintiff Carole Lymburn in his report |

|4-Feb-88 |Misuse of Telephone |UNKNOWN |MW 6406 | |REFUSED TO TAKE ACTION |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|2-Mar-88 |Misuse of Telephone |880205/1703 | |UNKNOWN |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|24-Jan-89 |Domestic Dispute |890125/5555 | |UNKNOWN |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|12-Sep-89 |Threats of Violence |not given |N J Nuku |Mr Tahere threatened to punch the plaintiff’s son Anthony |Mrs Kaka, the plaintiff’s next door neighbour at |

| | | | |Lymburn in the face and threatened to hit the plaintiff Carole|number 82 adjoining the plaintiff’s flat, had her |

| | | | |Lymburn over the head with a rock. Tahere was apparently given a|ex-husband living with her in her flat, for a few |

| | | | |stern warning regarding his threats. |months. |

| | | | | |During this time they both consistently drank in |

| | | | | |their flat, raised their voices excessively, argued, |

| | | | |Mrs Kaka then took up with a man called Tahere who moved in with|and kept the plaintiff awake night after night for |

| | | | |her for many months. |many weeks. |

| | | | |They too drank till all hours, yelling, banging the walls, | |

| | | | |screaming out and disturbing the plaintiff’s ability to |The blood vessels in the plaintiff’s eyes burst and |

| | | | |sleep. The plaintiff complained to Housing Corporation as it |bled into the plaintiff’s eyes through lack of sleep.|

| | | | |was then known as. | |

| | | | |Tahere threatened to attack the plaintiff and one day charged |Mr Kaka abused the plaintiff and threatened the |

| | | | |up to the fence screaming at the plaintiff that he would “ hit|plaintiff with violence because the plaintiff was |

| | | | |the plaintiff over the head with a rock”. |complaining about their behaviour. |

| | | | | | |

| | | | |The plaintiff consistently reported these events of violence| |

| | | | |to the Police as the plaintiff felt she needed protection. |Eventually Ms Kaka and her ex husband had a major |

| | | | | |argument and he left. |

| |continued | | |Tahere also threatened the plaintiff’s son Anthony and so |Mrs Kaka came to the plaintiff’s door to tell the |

| | | | |Anthony made a complaint against him. Re letter from Police |plaintiff to phone the Police if he ever came back. |

| | | | |11/10/1989 |The plaintiff son Anthony was visiting and he |

| | | | |After Tahere was warned officially, he took off and never |told her to leave the property. |

| | | | |returned. |Mrs Kaka was consistently causing trouble for the |

| | | | |Tahere was responsible for another downturn in the Plaintiffs |plaintiff by setting people on to the plaintiff, |

| | | | |health. |saying the plaintiff was a racist. She told the |

| | | | |The fright and shock that the plaintiff sustained from Tahere |plaintiff that she had a son in a “gang”. |

| | | | |sent the plaintiff’s blood pressure to a very dangerous level | |

| | | | |and the plaintiff had to go on to medication for high blood |She said publicly that the plaintiff was not a |

| | | | |pressure which had adverse side effects. |decent woman and that the plaintiff had suffered |

| | | | | |mental illness by being treated in Carrington. |

| | | | |The plaintiff had to go on to Blood pressure tablets for the | |

| | | | |rest of her life. |The whole neighbourhood was yelling these accusations|

| | | | | |at the plaintiff all the time. Saying the Police |

| | | | | |say the plaintiff was “ mental.” |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|8-Feb-90 |Plaintiff banned from |unknown |Sgt Burgoyne |The Plaintiff was ordered by David Kerr from 3 Guys |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| |Supermarket | | |Supermarket and accused of being out of Oakley Mental Hospital. |When Sgt Burgoyne talked to David Kerr the |

| | | | |David Kerr said "We are going to get rid of you. The Police are|Supermarket Manager. The plaintiff went into the |

| | | | |sick of you". The Plaintiff was Banned by him from the store. |Citizen's Advice Office when David Kerr ordered |

| | | | |Letter-20th June 91- Citizens Advice Bureau -confirming that the|the plaintiff out of the store, and they allowed |

| | | | |plaintiff called to their office very distressed and called |the plaintiff to call the Police who would not come |

| | | | |the Police when the plaintiff was ordered from the store by |down. Sgt Burgoyne apparently came down late in the |

| | | | |David Kerr. Letter 29th July 91- |day. The plaintiff’s son Anthony Lymburn went |

| | | | |Citizens Advice Bureau-Further letter confirming that the |into the watchtower at Central Station at midnight |

| | | | |Supermarket Manager followed the plaintiff into the Citizens |when Sgt Burgoyne came on duty again to discuss, |

| | | | |Advice Office and questioned the staff about the plaintiff’s |and Sgt Burgoyne was at a loss as to why they would|

| | | | |conversation with them. |treat the plaintiff in this manner. She asked the|

| | | | | |plaintiff’s son Anthony Lymburn if he knew any reason|

| | | | | |for their attitude towards the plaintiff . Sgt |

| | | | | |Burgoyne said there was talk by the Supermarket |

| | | | | |Manager David Kerr to his staff that the plaintiff |

| | | | | |was from Oakley Mental Hospital. David Kerr knew |

| | | | | |Constable Mathieson in the course of his |

| | | | | |Supermarket Duties and they had both become friendly.|

| | | | | |The banning of the plaintiff was later retracted in|

| | | | | |an Official letter from L.D. Nathan. Kerr was |

| | | | | |challenged by the plaintiff in the Tribunal, on |

| | | | | |oath, where he denied everything. |

|30-May-90 |Threats of Violence |unknown |NT Morris |Follow up to above incident with Tahere. |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | | | |Again a refusal to take any legal action. |

| | | | | |Plaintiff Informed matter has been closed by |

| | | | | |Police. The Plaintiff was advised by the Police|

| | | | | |to see a Lawyer and that they will not do anything |

| | | | | |further. N T Morris |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|unknown |Threats to cut the |Not given | |Incident in Pt Chevalier shopping Centre where a woman |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| |plaintiff’s throat | | |threatened to cut the plaintiff’s throat if the plaintiff |Police arrived to take the plaintiff home in a |

| | | | |didn't shut her mouth. The plaintiff went into the Hardware|Police car. No further action was taken and no |

| | | | |shop and the owner allowed the plaintiff to call the Police |follow up. |

|unknown |Threats to rape the |Not known | | | |

| |plaintiff | | | | |

|unknown |Threats to blow up the |Not known | | | |

| |plaintiff’s house | | | | |

|3-Dec-90 |Domestic Dispute |901217/2747 |Not known |On Police File |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|4-Dec-90 |Obscene language | |Constable |The child from 81 Moa Road called Adams began to call out |REFUSED TO TAKE ACTION |

| | | |Mathieson |filthy language to the plaintiff on the street and at the | |

| | | | |plaintiff’s lounge windows which look out to a reserve. He said| |

| | | | |“Get Fucked” and “Go fuck yourself”. | |

| | | | |Every time the plaintiff was on the street the plaintiff was | |

| | | | |subjected to filth from him and he was obviously out of control.| |

| | | | |The plaintiff’s son and the plaintiff approached Constable | |

| | | | |Mathieson on the 4th December 1990 and he refused to take any | |

| | | | |action saying they were a “nice family”. | |

| | | | |The plaintiff’s son challenged the child that afternoon when he | |

| | | | |again yelled obscene language at the plaintiff and her son as | |

| | | | |they were returning from the supermarket. | |

| | | | |The plaintiff’s son went to his house number 81 Moa Road and | |

| | | | |knocked on the door to speak to his mother. | |

| | | | |A woman came out claiming to be his mother and a man in her | |

| | | | |company. | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

| |continued | | |The plaintiff’s son explained that the boy was annoying the |REFUSED TO TAKE ACTION |

| | | | |plaintiff and asked them to put a stop to it. | |

| | | | |They both abused and threatened the plaintiff’s son and said | |

| | | | |they would punch him. They called him a “poofter” “Fairy” and| |

| | | | |to go home and “root his boyfriend” then go and “root your old | |

| | | | |lady, you both have got aids”. | |

| | | | |Plaintiff laid a complaint at the Central Station on 5th | |

| | | | |December 1990. | |

|5-Dec-90 |threats of violence |not given |Not known | |REFUSED TO TAKE COMPLAINT |

|8-Dec-90 |Obscene Abuse | |Plaintiff called |On Sunday 8th December 1990 and Monday 9th December 1990 |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |Central Station |plaintiff was subjected to obscene abuse by the Adams child | |

| | | |111 |again and youths in his company. | |

| | | | |On the Sunday the plaintiff called the Police to them and after | |

| | | | |the Police left the property the gang continued to abuse the | |

| | | | |plaintiff for a further 4 hours. | |

| | | | |They did a haka, exposed their buttocks, exposed their rectum’s,| |

| | | | |the child told the plaintiff to “suck his cock” and they made | |

| | | | |a spectacle so that the whole neighbourhood could see. | |

| | | | |Mrs Kaka, the plaintiff’s next door neighbour was talking to | |

| | | | |them the whole time encouraging them to do this to the | |

| | | | |plaintiff. Ms Kaka said she was their Aunty. | |

| | | | |They abused the plaintiff about her looks, her underwear on her | |

| | | | |clothesline, and threatened to beat up the plaintiff’s son when | |

| | | | |he arrived. | |

| |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

| |continued | | |The plaintiff reported the Adam’s boy to his Headmaster at |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | | |Pasadena school but the Headmaster said he did not want to be | |

| | | | |involved, he said he had a wife and children to worry about. | |

| | | | |This Adam’s child was obsessed with sex talk and appeared | |

| | | | |emotionally disturbed as he was squealing and screaming | |

| | | | |hysterically when there was any mention by the plaintiff about | |

| | | | |his behaviour. | |

|17-Mar-91 |Threatening language | | |Threats to gouge the plaintiff’s eyes out and put the plaintiff |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | | |in the ground by Jan Kaka the next door neighbour and a woman | |

| | | | |visitor to her home. | |

|30-Oct-91 |Common Assault |911031/5484 |A M Dixon 8700 |Plaintiff was threatened, abused and spat on while walking home |Refusal to take any action with comments by Constable|

| | | | |from the shops by Anna Brown from 81 Moa Road. |MacDonald defaming the plaintiff Comments in Report |

| | | | |Anna Brown stated that "the Police say you are mental". |that Constable Simpson was trying to encourage |

| | | | | |neighbours to make complaints about the plaintiff so |

| | | | | |the Police could take action against her. More |

| | | | | |defamatory comments by Constable AM Dixon 8700. |

| | | | | |According to Report made by A.M. Dixon there was an |

| | | | | |incident to which these officers attended. |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

|23-Mar-92 |Complaint by Plaintiff’s son | |Superintendent |Refusal of Police to protect the plaintiff & the plaintiff’s |23/3/92 in a formal report M.A. Fibbes- Area |

| |Anthony made to Minister of | |Mears National |son Anthony from Gary Chatterton's(convicted Drug Criminal) |Controller from Avondale Police Station- reports to |

| |Police Mr John Banks' Office | |Police |threats of violence to kill them. |Superintendent Mears in Parliament, that the |

| |for Lack of Police Action in a| |Headquarters-Inter| |plaintiff" is not certifiable but has a known mental |

| |phone call to Parliament | |nal Affairs | |problem" and the plaintiff’s son Anthony’s “ mental |

| |Buildings | |division | |stability is in question”. |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|8-Jun-92 |Disorderly Behaviour Juvenile |Not given | |Nathan Adams using abusive language at the plaintiff |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|9-07-92 |Obscene Language |Not given |Plaintiff rang |The plaintiff heard yelling at her gate. She opened her lounge |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|6.30pm | | |Police and they |window and saw a Maori man at her gate. He was yelling at the |The Police said they could not find him. |

| | | |attended |plaintiff to "Get Fucked" He was ferocious. | |

|30-Nov-92 |Threats to injure Plaintiff |Not given |Police Officer 269|Threats by 81 Moa Road to Injure the plaintiff |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|4-Dec-92 | |1207 |Jenny Gillam | |Offer of support from Victim Support |

| | | |Victim Support | | |

|29-Dec-92 |Prowler Unlawfully in |921229 |Not given-form not|Plaintiff found dirty clothing in her back yard with excrement |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| |Plaintiff’s yard | |signed-Ponsonby |on. Left by a trespasser. |Police Officer asked the Plaintiff if the filthy |

| | | |Police Station | |clothes belonged to her |

| | | |visit | | |

|8-Jan-93 |Plaintiff harassed on the |Plaintiff taxied to |Sergeant Mitchell-|Plaintiff harassed by Mrs Girven as she walked past her house on|NO ACTION TAKEN |

| |street. |Central Police |Promised to go and|her way to the shop. Mrs Girven came towards the footpath and | |

| | |Station |speak to them. |called the plaintiff a "Fucking Ugly Old Bitch". The plaintiff | |

| | | | |did not reply to her.The plaintiff continued to the shop and on | |

| | | | |her return a blonde woman with a push chair and young man came | |

| | | | |out of 81 Moa Road. She called out to the plaintiff to "get back| |

| | | | |to Oakley Hospital" | |

|20-Jan-93 |Plaintiff harassed on the |Plaintiff rang 111 | |Plaintiff went to the shops and was again accosted by a group of|NO ACTION TAKEN |

| |street. |Central Police | |people from 81 Moa Road | |

| | |Station | | | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|20-Jan-93 |Complaint written to John | |Lindsay Scott | | |

| |Banks Minister of Police-re: | |Senior Private | | |

| |Lack of Action | |Secretary | | |

|2/02/93 |Rocks thrown at the | |Avondale Police |Nathan Adams and youths threw rocks at plaintiff’s lounge |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|7.30pm |plaintiff’s windows | |came down |windows. Plaintiff went out and they threw rocks at the |The plaintiff still has custody of these rocks. |

| | | | |plaintiff in her yard. They luckily missed hitting the | |

| | | | |plaintiff. | |

|7/02/93 |Plaintiff rang Police about | |Police said they |They took notes on Nathan Adams. |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|4.05pm |Nathan Adams annoying | |would come at 6pm | | |

| |plaintiff | |but two Policemen | | |

| | | |arrived at 7pm. | | |

|11-Feb-93 | | |Sergeant Woodhouse|Plaintiff received a call from Avondale Station Sargeant | |

| | | | |Woodhouse about her complaint and he said he would call again | |

| | | | |on the 12 Feb 93. He instead rang on the 13th Feb 93. | |

| | | | |He said he would go to 81 Moa Road and speak to them and come in| |

| | | | |the evening to see the plaintiff. | |

| | | | |He never arrived. | |

|1-Mar-93 |Plaintiff Abused by Anna Brown| |Plaintiff Rang | |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |Police | | |

|2-Mar-93 |Plaintiff Abused by Anna Brown| |Plaintiff Rang | |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |Police | | |

|7-Mar-93 |Plaintiff Abused by |9302/073819 |Constables 0513 & |Adams boy & Gang arrived in Reserve next Door on Sunday |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| |youths-Trespass 111 Call| |0399 |Afternoon abusing the plaintiff. | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|10-Mar-93 |Plaintiff Rang Ponsonby Police|Constables Richardson| | | |

| |about Complaints |& Maunsell came to | | | |

| | |call | | | |

|10-Mar-93 |Dispute |930312/6165 |Constable Ashby | |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|16-Mar-93 |Misuse of Telephone |930316 |Constable Lees |Obscene phone call to Plaintiff’s son Anthony Lymburn |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | | | |Traced by Telecom to Helen Makavilitogia 1042 Great |

| | | | | |North Road Pt Chevalier |

|23-Mar-93 |Common Assault | |Constable Farene |Plaintiff was accosted and abused on the street on her way home |Constable Farene asked one of the culprits Marcello |

| | | | |from the Supermarket by 4 youths. One youth came after the |Di Riscio to write to the plaintiff saying he would |

| | | | |plaintiff and he threw a dog biscuit at the plaintiff hitting |not do it again and an apology form him and his |

| | | | |her on the back. The plaintiff went to the Dairy and the owner |friends. Constable Farene advised the plaintiff that|

| | | | |allowed her to call the Police who took an age to arrive. The |he had been to 81 Moa Road at least 4 times about |

| | | | |Police chased one youth down the street. The Police told the |drug enquiries. |

| | | | |plaintiff to go on home. | |

|31-Mar-93 |Obscene Language |930312/6165 |P.A. Mildenhall |Plaintiff abused with obscenities from Lawn Mowing Contractors.|NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |0601 | |Senior Sargent Mildenhall states it is okay for these|

| | | | | |men to use obscenities on the plaintiff in her my |

| | | | | |back yard as long as no member of the General Public |

| | | | | |hears it. |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|31-Mar-93 |Assault & disorderly Behaviour|930307/9009 |P.A. Mildenhall |Assault. Plaintiff’s son Anthony Lymburn assaulted and sustains|Mildenhall blames the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s |

| | | |0601 |a lacerated liver and Plaintiff injures her back and shoulder |son Anthony for provoking the incident even though |

| | | | |aiding her son. |the youth trespassed on to the plaintiff’s property |

| | | | | |and smashed her wheeley bin down her path. Mildenhall|

| | | | | |then concedes that the plaintiff and her son should |

| | | | | |not take the law into their own hands. He accuses The|

| | | | | |plaintiff (at the age of 70 and on the urgent list |

| | | | | |to have a knee replacement operation) of attacking |

| | | | | |young boys- one of whom is in fact 18 years old. He |

| | | | | |decides to warn everyone. |

|??-5-93 |Assault Complaint to Minister |Richard Prebble & | | |P.A. Mildenhall 0601 advises Minister of Police that |

| |of Police |John Banks | | |the Plaintiff and her son Anthony assaulted the |

| | | | | |boys. When the plaintiff’s son requests an |

| | | | | |appointment to see Mr Banks he is advised by Lindsay |

| | | | | |Scott Senior Secretary to Mr Banks, that he can't |

| | | | | |that Banks is not interested, and he should try the |

| | | | | |Police Complaints Authority. |

|21/Sep/93 |Rocks thrown at plaintiff’s | |Plaintiff rang | |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|8pm |garage and windows | |Central Station | | |

|26-Oct-93 |Harassment | |Plaintiff went |Plaintiff harassed at front gate while putting out her rubbish |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |into Central |tin | |

| | | |Police Station | | |

|2-Nov-93 | | |P.A. Mildenhall | |Phone message from Mildenhall "Will let me know" |

| | | |0601 | |situation again. |

|8/Nov/93 |Plaintiff harassed by Nathan |Not given |Plaintiff rang |Nathan Adams still annoying plaintiff and banging on her door | |

|6.30pm |Adams | |Central Police |to frighten her. | |

| | | |Station | | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|8-Nov-93 |Notes found on Housing New | |P.A. Mildenhall |Senior Sergeant Peter Mildenhall phoned Graeme Ogle (who tried |This shows the Police Conspiring with Housing New |

| |Zealand file. | |0601 |to have the plaintiff committed to an Mental Institution) to |Zealand to remove the plaintiff from her home instead|

| | | | |discuss how they were going to successfully evict the plaintiff |of protecting her rights. Where was Senior Sergeant |

| | | | |from her home. Mildenhall is reported as saying that he "wants |Mildenhall going to evict the plaintiff to? |

| | | | |to keep a low profile" and wants to know when Housing New | |

| | | | |Zealand have a clear date so he can advance plan and "ensure | |

| | | | |that appropriate staff are involved". He reveals to Housing New | |

| | | | |Zealand that the plaintiff was a "Crime line" caller. Comments | |

| | | | |are found in the Housing New Zealand files which quote the | |

| | | | |following "I accept that this action is politically sensitive | |

| | | | |and that Miss Lymburn will not surrender quietly" 9/12/92 and | |

| | | | |re: the petition "It is to be presented to the Local Community | |

| | | | |Constable who has been told not to follow up a continual steam | |

| | | | |of complaints he receives about and from Mrs Lymburn" 9/12/92. | |

| | | | |Further comments are: "This will not be well received, and we | |

| | | | |will need to prepare for the onslaught that is almost certain to| |

| | | | |occur. However, enough is enough, and the time has come for the | |

| | | | |situation to be brought to a conclusion" 13/11/92. | |

| | | | |"Let's wait and see what happens. The termination is an option I| |

| | | | |will agree to when we have thought out a strategy to deal | |

| | | | |with the consequent media( or at least Ministerial) attention | |

| | | | |which will almost surely follow" Perhaps in anticipation we | |

| | | | |could open dialogue with Police Community Health Workers and | |

| | | | |Department of Social Welfare." 18/10/93. | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|15-Nov-93 |P.A.Mildenhall –secretly | |P.A. Mildenhall |Senior Sergeant Peter Mildenhall called at the plaintiff’s | |

| |taping plaintiff’s | |0601 |home uninvited with another Police Officer. They entered the | |

| |conversation | | |plaintiff’s lounge and they discussed the issues at hand. | |

| | | | |Senior Sergeant Mildenhall threatened the plaintiff that if she | |

| | | | |and her son made another complaint he would take the plaintiff | |

| | | | |and her son to court and have them prosecuted. He was | |

| | | | |intimidating to the plaintiff because he was using his Senior | |

| | | | |position as a Police Officer to frighten her with the law. The | |

| | | | |plaintiff challenged him to go right ahead and said it would be | |

| | | | |the best thing he could do. One of the Police was wearing a wire| |

| | | | |and they were secretly taping the conversation as if the | |

| | | | |plaintiff was some criminal, however upon releasing the tape to | |

| | | | |the plaintiff it is revealed that part of the conversation that | |

| | | | |is threatening has been edited from the front of the | |

| | | | |conversation. In a later part of this recorded tape the | |

| | | | |plaintiff is heard to say,"you repeat those threats to me again”| |

| | | | |and he denies it. The plaintiff is not a criminal and does not | |

| | | | |need to be secretly taped without her consent. The plaintiff is | |

| | | | |an honest person. | |

|26-Nov-93 |Complaint to Commissioner of |B.P. Duncan Assistant| | |Sgt Jones called at the plaintiff’s home to discuss |

| |Police for Lack of Police |Commissioner of | | |and an Interview is granted with N.W. Stanhope |

| |Action |Police | | |District Commander and Superintendent |

|30-Nov-93 |Threats of Violence |Rang 111 Central | |Anna Brown and associate threatened the plaintiff over the |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | |Station | |fence in the reserve saying "I know where your bedroom is, you | |

| | | | |won't be here tomorrow". | |

|3-Dec-93 |Gang at plaintiff’s Gate |Rang 111 Central |3 Constables |Said they would break in and attack the plaintiff and that the |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | |Station |Attended |plaintiff “ would not be there by morning". | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|2-Feb-94 | |Rang 111 Central |Avondale attended |Nathan Adams and youths throwing rocks at the plaintiff’s |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|7.30pm | |Station | |windows-The plaintiff was shocked and began to feel ill. | |

|20-Mar-94 |Domestic Incident-Verbally |940320/8938 |F.A.C. 304 | |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| |abused-Obscene language | | | | |

|21-Mar-94 |Threatening Language |Not given |GS45 Victim | | |

| | | |Support | | |

|22-Mar-94 |Neighbourhood dispute |NOT GIVEN |NOT GIVEN | | |

|19-Sep-94 |Complaint of Verbal Abuse |NOT GIVEN |Central Police |The plaintiff laid a complaint at the Central Station on the | |

| | | |Station |19th September 1994 and was told they would contact the | |

| | | | |Community Constable. The plaintiff asked repeatedly for a | |

| | | | |complaint notice but was denied one and told by the officer " I | |

| | | | |will get in touch with the Community Constable".The plaintiff | |

| | | | |rang to speak to Community Constable Taylor and was told by Ms| |

| | | | |Callender that Sergeant Dimmery at Ponsonby would always be | |

| | | | |dealing with her complaints. Ms Callender accused the plaintiff | |

| | | | |of starting the trouble.Ms Callender was overriding any | |

| | | | |authority she had as she was only a volunteer. | |

| | | | |The plaintiff I then rang Ponsonby and spoke to Sergeant Dimmery| |

| | | | |and told him Constable Taylor had called with a complaint form | |

| | | | |and she wanted it corrected. The plaintiff had not spoken and | |

| | | | |had received abuse so no argument had occurred just abuse. | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

| | | | |position. She had not spoken a word to them,they had abused | |

| | | | |her.The plaintiff wanted the part "Argument with Neighbours' | |

| | | | |corrected as this was what they had put down on the Complaint | |

| | | | |Form and this was incorrect.The plaintiff did not speak to the | |

| | | | |neighbour at any time. When the plaintiff brought this to | |

| | | | |Sergeant Dimmery's attention he became abusive and said a lot | |

| | | | |of complaints have occurred and you have been the cause of it. | |

| | | | |He raised his voice to me and said "are you threatening me?". I| |

| | | | |replied that I was the one who made the complaint and I was not | |

| | | | |a criminal that he was dealing with. He still kept threatening | |

| | | | |me with his rank and what he would do to me. He said there are | |

| | | | |two sides to every story. He then used a taunting voice and said| |

| | | | |"I'm a Senior Sergeant and address me so, you silly Old Woman". | |

| | | | |He then hung up. I had addressed him as Sergeant. | |

|5-Dec-94 |Complaint of Lack of Police | |Y.J. Carleton 8161| |Constable Carlton consistently reported she thinks |

| |Action | |-Ponsonby | |the plaintiff is mental and would not be persuaded |

| | | |P.A. Dimery | |other wise. Constable Carlton had been briefed by |

| | | |Senior Sargeant. | |Sergeant Dimery who refused to take any action and |

| | | |Ponsonby | |called the Plaintiff "a silly old woman". Carlton |

| | | |N.W. Stanhope | |tried all sorts of underhanded enquiries to prove her|

| | | |District Commander| |point but failed to prove anything. She said she |

| | | |Superintendent-Cen| |could not find any defamatory information in the |

| | | |tral. | |files about the plaintiff and yet all the files were |

| | | |Phil Keber- | |full of defamation against the plaintiff. |

| | | |Avondale Station | | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|21-Feb-96 |Abuse |UNKNOWN |Sergeant Guy |Plaintiff laid a complaint about Kathleen Foley |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |-Central Police | | |

| | | |Station | | |

|26-Mar-96 | |UNKNOWN |Sergeant Gilmore |Police rang plaintiff and wanted to visit her about Kathleen | |

| | | | |Foley and Nathan Adams | |

|2-Apr-96 |Trespassers on plaintiff’s |UNKNOWN |A man & woman |Disturbance and loud banging on plaintiff’s door. |Police could not find anyone |

| |property | |Constable came out| | |

|??-May-96 |Threats of Violence |UNKNOWN |Plaintiff rang 111|Daniel Reid was threatening to come over the street and injure | |

|8pm | | |Central Station- |the plaintiff . The plaintiff was inside her property | |

| | | |Constable Cameron | | |

| | | |Harding called at | | |

| | | |9pm | | |

|2-May-96 |Plaintiff rang Takapuna |UNKNOWN |Plaintiff spoke to|Plaintiff rang Takapuna Police Station as No Action was being| |

| |Station | |a woman Officer |taken and she wanted their advice about it. | |

| | | |called Trudy | | |

|10-May-96 |Trespassers |UNKNOWN |Plaintiff rang |Eggs were thrown at the plaintiff’s windows while someone was |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|6.30pm | | |Central Station |banging on her door.The plaintiff was very frightened. |See photographs of eggs splattered onto plaintiff’s |

| | | |111 but was | |windows and walls. |

| | | |referred to | | |

| | | |operations | | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|13-May-96 |Call from 111 Central Station |UNKNOWN |Police Officer |The phone rang. The plaintiff answered. A man said "Carole | |

|7.55pm | | |refused to give |Lymburn, how are you? Police here. Have you been shining your | |

| | | |his name |torch on the neighbours windows?"The plaintiff said "No" He | |

| | | | |again said "Have you?"The plaintiff again said "No".The | |

| | | | |plaintiff asked "What neighbours?" He would not say for a while | |

| | | | |and then said "Mrs Kathleen Foley" He then remarked " I don't| |

| | | | |want to have to send a car down unnecessarily". He was | |

| | | | |officious and intimidating and the plaintiff thought it was a | |

| | | | |fictitious call. | |

|16-May-96 |Malicious phone call lodged as|960619/3406 |Constable Fiona |The plaintiff received a phone call from a very |Plaintiff rang 111 who denied making such a call. The|

| |a Complaint | |McNeill- Auckland |confrontational person identifying himself as “the |plaintiff laid a complaint to the Police about this |

| | | |Central |Police” about the plaintiff shining her torch from her lounge |malicious call. N.W. Stanhope said that the Police |

| | | |A.H. Lee Inspector|window outside to her yard to catch a prowler. The person on |would not conduct such a practice. |

| | | |Control Room D.W. |the phone was accusing the plaintiff of shining the torch at |REFUSED TO ACT. |

| | | |McConnell |her neighbour’s windows up thestreet. |The plaintiff had call traced by Telecom who traced |

| | | |Superintendent | |it to the Control Room at Central Station. The tape |

| | | |Inspector Rod | |was destroyed when requested. The Plaintiff reported|

| | | |Drummond | |this incident to the Police Complaints Authority. |

|19-May-96 |Plaintiff rang Central Station|UNKNOWN |Plaintiff spoke to| | |

| | | |N.W. Stanhope | | |

| | | |about the | | |

| | | |situation | | |

|22-Jun-96 |Threats of Violence |UNKNOWN |Plaintiff rang |Mr Tito was abusing the plaintiff and she felt very threatened |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |Central Police |so she rang the Central Police Station to ask advice because | |

| | | |Station and spoke |he said he was "Going to Fix” her. The Police came down. The | |

| | | |to a Constable |Officer asked the Plaintiff if she drank or smoked. | |

| | | |called Irene | | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|23-Jun-96 |Plaintiff rang Central Station|UNKNOWN |Mr Agnew |The Plaintiff spoke with Youth Aid Worker Mr Agnew about Nathan |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | | |Adams. He said he would get in touch with Ponsonby. | |

|3-Jul-96 |Plaintiff rang Central Station|UNKNOWN | |The plaintiff called the Police re Kathleen Foley. They came out|NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | | |and the Plaintiff demanded that they go over to Foley to warn |The plaintiff rang her Lawyer today and the lawyer |

| | | | |her to stop continually abusing the plaintiff. |she said that she would prepare a letter to Kathleen |

| | | | | |Foley. |

|16-Sep-96 |Plaintiff rang Central Station|UNKNOWN |Constable Drummond|Plaintiff spoke to Drummond about the call made to her and he | |

|10pm |about the malicious call from | | |said "I won't tell you who the Policeman was" He said to the | |

| |them | | |plaintiff "you are paranoid" twice during the conversation and | |

| | | | |"its past your bedtime". | |

|12-Oct-96 |Plaintiff abused by neighbour |UNKNOWN |Constable Parker |Plaintiff came home and a maori woman came along with a child |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | | |with a stick and bashed her letterbox. The plaintiff said " | |

| | | | |don't do that please". Kathleen Foley came outside and yelled | |

| | | | |out from across the road "Get inside you British Bitch" and" Get| |

| | | | |Fucked" and made obscene gestures to the plaintiff. The | |

| | | | |plaintiff told her to keep quiet and the plaintiff locked her | |

| | | | |gate.The plaintiff then rang the Central Police Station and | |

| | | | |asked them if they would do anything. A cheeky constable called | |

| | | | |Parker said "Get the Community Constable". and hung up the phone| |

| | | | |on the plaintiff. | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|14-Nov-96 3pm|Trespassers in plaintiff’s |UNKNOWN |Plaintiff rang 111|Two maori youths were trespassing in the plaintiff’s yard. When |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| |yard | |Central Station |she challenged them they said they were after their ball. The | |

| | | | |plaintiff became nervous and told them to leave. They | |

| | | | |refused. They said "This isn't your property it belongs to | |

| | | | |the Council". The plaintiff rang the Police. They did not come | |

| | | | |so she rang again at 3.55pm to ask if they were coming and they| |

| | | | |said, "When we get a car". | |

|22-Nov-96 |Plaintiff abused by neighbour |UNKNOWN |Constable Smalley |The plaintiff rang the Police to come to the man in 72 Moa Road |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | | |who drove along the footpath, about 100metres, to the | |

| | | | |plaintiff’s gate and threatened her. His name was S. PAVAHI and| |

| | | | |he said to the plaintiff "Old woman we are going to | |

| | | | |get you put in a home". The plaintiff was very shocked to hear | |

| | | | |this threat. | |

|22-Nov-96 |Plaintiff rang Glen Innes |UNKNOWN | |The plaintiff rang Glen Innes Police to seek some advice as to | |

| |Police | | |what she could do. She spoke to Sergeant Murray. He advised | |

| | | | |her about a Trespass Order. | |

|2-Dec-96 |Trespass Notice Registered by |UNKNOWN |K154 Police |The plaintiff served a Trespass notice on Kathleen Foley | |

| |plaintiff | |Counter Central |Kathleen Foley 71 Moa Road Pt Chevalier by registered mail. | |

| | | |Station | | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|18-Aug-97 |Theft of Plaintiff’s son’s |UNKNOWN |Senior Sergeant |Plaintiff’s son Anthony Lymburn's briefcase was stolen from his|The plaintiff’s son Anthony Lymburn was insulted |

| |briefcase | |Anderson |car in Brown Street Ponsonby while he was visiting a friend. |about his mother’s mentality when he was filing a |

| | | | | |complaint. He was very distressed by what was said to|

| | | | | |him. Anthony Lymburn laid a complaint with the Police|

| | | | | |Complaints Authority who commissioned Chief Inspector|

| | | | | |Palmer-Eastern Area Headquarters to investigate. He |

| | | | | |was left with no option but to dismiss the |

| | | | | |complaint when Sergeant Anderson produced an unnamed |

| | | | | |mystery witness. |

|15-Aug-98 |Plaintiff Harassed at the |695138 |Zita-Central |The plaintiff was harassed at the Supermarket in Pt Chevalier |NO ACTION TAKEN |

|12 Noon |Supermarket | |Station |by Tahere & Jan Kaka | |

|17-Sep-98 |Verbal Abuse |UNKNOWN |Plaintiff rang |The plaintiff was abused by Mr Oxenbridge. |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |Central Police | | |

| | | |Station 111 | | |

| | | |Sergeant Paynter | | |

|20-Dec-99 |Obscene Abuse |UNKNOWN |Plaintiff called |The plaintiff was abused by Nathan Adams who called her a |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |the Police |"Fucking Bitch" | |

|21-Dec-99 |Offensive Language |JSG 553 |Constable J |The Plaintiff was abused by Nathan Adams who yelled out from |NO ACTION TAKEN |

| | | |Samuela Avondale |his front gate that the plaintiff was a "Fucking Bastard" | |

|23-Dec-99 |Domestic Incident-Verbally |UNKNOWN |Plaintiff rang |The plaintiff was abused by the next door neighbour Mr | |

| |abused | |Central Station |Oxenbridge | |

| | | |111 | | |

|24-Dec-99 | |UNKNOWN |Plaintiff rang |The plaintiff was abused by Mr Oxenbridge | |

| | | |Central Police | | |

| | | |Station | | |

|DATE |COMPLAINT |FILE NUMBER |CONSTABLE |INCIDENT |RESULTS |

| | | |OFFICIATING | | |

|24-Jan-00 | |960402/0734 |A.H. Snaithe | |The plaintiff was told that she was not entitled to|

| | | | | |know what action if any, had been taken by the |

| | | | | |Constable at Ponsonby. The plaintiff wrote a letter |

| | | | | |of complaint to Snaithe about his prejudice towards |

| | | | | |her in dealing with this complaint.. |

|Unknown | |960703/2940 |On file | |File Had Gone Missing |

|Unknown | |971001/4730 |On file | |File Had Gone Missing |

|Unknown | |930309/6150 |On file | |File Had Gone Missing |

|Unknown | |910408/7537 |On file | |File Had Gone Missing |

|Unknown | |930307/9009 |On file | |Information deleted from file |

|unknown | |860824/84 |A.H. Snaith 3872 | |Information deleted from file |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download