Collaborative Community in Schools, page
In Professional Responsibility: The Fundamental Issue in Education and Healthcare Reform. Routledge, forthcoming (2013).The Mutations of Professional Responsibility: Toward Collaborative Community byPaul S. Adler (Univ. Southern California)Charles Heckscher (Rutgers Univ.)John McCarthy (Rutgers Univ.)Saul A. Rubinstein (Rutgers Univ.)AbstractProfessionals are distinctive insofar as in their primary activities they are oriented by what Max Weber called “value-rationality” – by their commitment to ultimate values such as education or health or justice, rather than by tradition, affectual ties, or instrumental rationality. But it is not easy to organize large-scale collectivities in such a way as to sustain value-rationality. Historically, the professions relied on guild-like traditionalistic structures of status and loyalty. Under performance and accountability pressures, many professional occupations have been abandoning this traditionalistic form, replacing it with instrumental-rationality, and thereby driving professions towards bureaucratic and market forms of organization. But these organizational forms afford professionals little relief from growing pressure to improve efficiency, quality and responsiveness. We argue that over the past few decades, a cluster of innovative organizing techniques have arisen that allow professionals to respond more effectively to these pressures by giving value-rationality much-needed organizational robustness and resilience. Deploying these new techniques, numerous professional collectivities have begun forming what we call “collaborative communities.” We illustrate the power of value-rational collaborative community with examples drawn from prior research on medicine and we describe our efforts to test our theory with a survey in public schools. IntroductionThere is a widespread sense, reflected in the theme of this conference, that the professions are at a crossroads. At least in the US and UK, the professions have for centuries stood apart from, and resistant to, the rationalizing forces of markets and bureaucracy, claiming to be driven not by self-interest but by a responsibility to higher social purposes, and asserting on that basis the right to autonomous occupational control. In the former, values aspect, the professions embodied what Max Weber called a “value-rational” orientation ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Weber</Author><Year>1978</Year><RecNum>2637</RecNum><DisplayText>(Weber, 1978)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2637</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">2637</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Weber,Max</author></authors><secondary-authors><author>Roth,Gunther</author><author>Wittich,Claus</author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title>Economy and society</title></titles><dates><year>1978</year><pub-dates><date>//</date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location>Berkeley CA</pub-location><publisher>University of California Press</publisher><label>WEBER1978</label><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Weber, 1978); in the latter, organizational aspect, they resembled craft guilds. Over the past half-century, the tide of rationalization has swept over both established professions and other occupations attempting to assert professional status, reducing many to the status of experts in bureaucratic hierarchies or small business owners. Today, even the last bastions are under siege: lawyers, physicians, teachers – the most ancient and strongly institutionalized of the professions – are under intense pressure to submit to bureaucratic standards and market competition. Our thesis is that the professions can and should avoid succumbing to these pressures by reinvigorating their claims to higher purpose; but that to do that, these occupations need to reinvent their organizational forms so as to enable a wider scope of collaboration within and across professions and a deeper dialogue with stakeholders outside the professions. Neither a return to the guild form of professionalism nor further bureaucratization or marketization will enable professionals to meet the challenges we and they face today.Our research suggests that a new organizational form is needed that gives value-rationality greater institutional robustness, and we find that recent decades have seen the emergence of a cluster of innovations that promise precisely that. We call this emergent form “collaborative community” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Heckscher</Author><Year>2006</Year><RecNum>14726</RecNum><DisplayText>(Heckscher & Adler, 2006)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>14726</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">14726</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Heckscher, C</author><author>Adler, PS</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy</title></titles><dates><year>2006</year></dates><pub-location>New York</pub-location><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Heckscher & Adler, 2006). These innovations buttress values and trust so as to improve teamwork both within the profession and in relations with other service providers, clients, and other stakeholders. They provide an organizational form that supports professionals’ orientation to their common purpose. In what follows, we offer some examples from healthcare, and describe some research currently under way in schools. The professions: From guild to contractProfessional occupations can be characterized by three main attributes: (a) non-routine tasks requiring expertise based on both abstract knowledge and practical apprenticeship; (b) occupational monopoly over this practice jurisdiction and individual autonomy within it; and (c) legal and ethical responsibility for this practice that is typically reflected in values of service. The third of these three attributes makes professionals distinctive in their “value-rational” action orientation: their daily work is oriented by their commitment to ultimate values such as justice, health, education ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Satow</Author><Year>1975</Year><RecNum>1237</RecNum><DisplayText>(Satow, 1975)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1237</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">1237</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Satow, R. L</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Value-rational authority and professional organizations</title><secondary-title>Administrative Science Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Administrative Science Quarterly</full-title><abbr-1>Admin. Sci. Quart.</abbr-1><abbr-2>Adm Sci Q</abbr-2></periodical><pages>526-531</pages><volume>20</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>1975</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Satow, 1975). Such an action orientation contrasts with traditionalistic action, which is oriented to the means of action by habit or attachment to sacred tradition; it contrasts with affectual action, which is oriented to emotional goals; and it contrasts with instrumental-rational action which is oriented to the selection of the most efficient means for reaching taken-for-granted ends.Weber doubted that value-rationality could form the basis of robust, large-scale, purposive organization because, in his view, it lacks a feature he saw as essential to such endeavors, namely imperative command (Weber, 1978: Vol. I, pp. 271-284; 289-292). Indeed, under value-rationality, actors’ behavior is coordinated, in the first instance, only by their common rational commitment to the shared end-value, and in such a collectivity, the scope for coordination by command is very limited. It is therefore a poor instrument for implementing the will of a master. Weber saw value-rationality as effective only in small, “collegial” organizations —advisory bodies without decision-making responsibilities, and the small leadership groups at the top of large organizations ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Noble</Author><Year>1970</Year><RecNum>15274</RecNum><DisplayText>(Noble & Pym, 1970)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>15274</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">15274</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Noble, T.</author><author>Pym, B.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Collegial authority and the receding locus of power</title><secondary-title>British Journal of Sociology</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>British Journal of Sociology</full-title><abbr-1>Br. J. Sociology</abbr-1><abbr-2>Br J Sociol</abbr-2></periodical><pages>431-445</pages><dates><year>1970</year></dates><isbn>0007-1315</isbn><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Noble & Pym, 1970) — not in larger-scale organizations under pressure to make “precise, clear, and above all, rapid decisions” (Weber, 1978: Vol. I, p. 277). In the face of this dilemma, how then have the professions organized themselves? When the professions first arose, they buttressed value-rationality with organizational structures based on traditionalism, borrowing the form of the craft guilds ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Light</Author><Year>1988</Year><RecNum>2847</RecNum><DisplayText>(Krause, 1996; Light & Levine, 1988)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2847</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">2847</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Light, D.</author><author>Levine, S.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The changing character of the medical profession: a theoretical overview</title><secondary-title>Milbank Q</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Milbank Quarterly</full-title><abbr-1>Milbank Q.</abbr-1><abbr-2>Milbank Q</abbr-2></periodical><pages>10-32</pages><volume>66</volume><number>Suppl 2</number><keywords><keyword>Europe</keyword><keyword>Human</keyword><keyword>Medicine/*trends</keyword><keyword>Philosophy, Medical</keyword><keyword>Power (Psychology)</keyword><keyword>Professional Corporations</keyword><keyword>Professional Practice/*trends</keyword><keyword>Social Control, Formal</keyword><keyword>Social Dominance</keyword><keyword>Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</keyword><keyword>United States</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1988</year></dates><label>89281276</label><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Krause</Author><Year>1996</Year><RecNum>6508</RecNum><record><rec-number>6508</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6508</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Krause, E. A. </author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present</title></titles><dates><year>1996</year></dates><pub-location>New Haven</pub-location><publisher>Yale University Press</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Krause, 1996; Light & Levine, 1988). The professions long resembled guilds — largely traditionalistic, Gemeinschaft-type collectivities, strongly reliant on fixed status hierarchies, and oriented to handing on distinctive traditions of expertise that were closely held against outsiders. Trust here was based on adherence to common traditions and embedded in rigid status structures. Professional responsibility here meant loyalty – loyalty to one’s professional peers, superiors, and traditions. The limitations of this form of professionalism are well known. Relative to collectivities based on the self-interested, contractual logic of markets or bureaucracies, traditionalistic guilds were slow to develop and diffuse radically new technologies; they were not effective in coordinating larger-scale undertakings requiring a complex division of labor; and they were resistant to meddling outsiders and foreign ideas. It is hardly surprising that pressures toward efficiency, control, and accountability have driven many professions away from the guild form. These pressures are external, coming from clients, courts, and regulators ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Scott</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>6537</RecNum><DisplayText>(Scott, Ruef, Mendel, & Caronna, 2000)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6537</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6537</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Scott, W. R.</author><author>Ruef, M.</author><author>Mendel, P. J.</author><author>Caronna, C. </author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Institutional Change and Health Care Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care</title></titles><dates><year>2000</year></dates><pub-location>Chicago</pub-location><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Scott, Ruef, Mendel, & Caronna, 2000); they are internal, due to competition from other practitioners ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Gaynor</Author><Year>1999</Year><RecNum>10214</RecNum><DisplayText>(<style size="11">Gaynor</style> & <style size="11">Haas-Wilson.</style>, <style size="11">1999</style>)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>10214</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">10214</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">Gaynor, M., D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">Haas-Wilson.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">Change, Consolidation, and Competition in Health Care Markets</style></title><secondary-title><style face="italic" font="default" size="11">Journal of Economic Perspectives</style></secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Economic Perspectives</full-title><abbr-1>J. Econom. Perspect.</abbr-1><abbr-2>J Econ Perspect</abbr-2></periodical><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">141-164</style></pages><volume>13</volume><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">1</style></number><dates><year><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">1999</style></year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Gaynor & Haas-Wilson., 1999); and they are inter-professional, as categories jostle over jurisdictions PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5CZWNoa3k8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDAzPC9ZZWFyPjxS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ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5CZWNoa3k8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDAzPC9ZZWFyPjxS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ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Bechky, 2003; Halpern, 1992; Zetka, 2001). As a result, over the course of the last century, the organization of the established professions – medicine, law, education — shifted towards the instrumental rationality of market and bureaucracy. And as new expert occupations arose — architects, scientists, engineering, accounting, social work, etc. — their claims to professional status encountered deep resistance. (Layton ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Layton</Author><Year>1971</Year><RecNum>1736</RecNum><DisplayText>(1971)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1736</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">1736</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Layton, Jr., Edwin T</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The revolt of the engineers</title></titles><dates><year>1971</year></dates><pub-location>Cleveland</pub-location><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(1971) traces the failed attempt of engineers to develop a professional status in the face of forces driving them to subordination in corporate hierarchies.) The guild ethos did not entirely disappear, but it was increasingly subordinated to the demands of market competition and bureaucratic controls. By the end of the twentieth century, the independent, self-employed, “liberal” professions represented but one small part of the spectrum of expert occupations, the others taking the form of organizational professions (e.g. managers, salaried engineers, technicians, teachers), and experts for hire (e.g. consultants, project engineers, computer analysts) ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Brint</Author><Year>1994</Year><RecNum>3719</RecNum><DisplayText>(Brint, 1994; Reed, 1996)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>3719</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">3719</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Brint, Steven G.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life</title></titles><pages>x, 278</pages><keywords><keyword>Professions Social aspects United States</keyword><keyword>Middle class United States</keyword><keyword>Intellectuals United States</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1994</year></dates><pub-location>Princeton, N.J.</pub-location><publisher>Princeton University Press</publisher><isbn>0691033994 (CL)</isbn><call-num>Ht687 .b75 1994
305.5/53</call-num><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Reed</Author><Year>1996</Year><RecNum>6529</RecNum><record><rec-number>6529</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6529</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Reed, M.I. </author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Expert power and control in later modernity: An empirical review and theoretical synthesis</title><secondary-title>Organization Studies</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Organization Studies</full-title><abbr-1>Organ. Stud.</abbr-1></periodical><pages>573-597</pages><volume>17</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>1996</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Brint, 1994; Reed, 1996). Across this entire spectrum, professional responsibility increasingly meant conformance to formal bureaucratic standards and to market norms of self-interest.The professions at a critical junctureThe trend towards instrumental-rationality and to organizational forms based on contractual self-interest is incompatible with professionals’ responsibility to higher social purposes. Tensions have mounted accordingly. When managed-care companies attempt to control treatment decisions through denials of payment authorization, and when drug formularies restrict the range of medications physicians can prescribe PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5IaW1tZWxzdGVpbjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDE8L1ll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 EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5IaW1tZWxzdGVpbjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDE8L1ll
YXI+PFJlY051bT40ODk5PC9SZWNOdW0+PERpc3BsYXlUZXh0PihIaW1tZWxzdGVpbiwgSGVsbGFu
ZGVyLCAmYW1wOyBXb29saGFuZGxlciwgMjAwMTsgV2FycmVuLCBXZWl0eiwgJmFtcDsgS3VsaXMs
IDE5OTgpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjQ4OTk8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+
PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSJlNXZkdzlkd2R4c3BkYWVkZnRrdjVk
d2JhMHA5eHpkcnNkdHQiPjQ4OTk8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0i
Qm9vayI+NjwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkhpbW1lbHN0
ZWluLCBEYXZpZCBVLjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+SGVsbGFuZGVyLCBJZGE8L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0
aG9yPldvb2xoYW5kbGVyLCBTdGVmZmllPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3Jz
Pjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkJsZWVkaW5nIHRoZSBQYXRpZW50OiBUaGUgQ29uc2VxdWVuY2VzIG9m
IENvcnBvcmF0ZSBIZWFsdGhjYXJlPC90aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGFnZXM+MjM4PC9wYWdlcz48
a2V5d29yZHM+PGtleXdvcmQ+SGVhbHRoIG1haW50ZW5hbmNlIG9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbnMgVW5pdGVk
IFN0YXRlczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5NYW5hZ2VkIGNhcmUgcGxhbnMgKE1lZGljYWwgY2Fy
ZSkgVW5pdGVkIFN0YXRlczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5NZWRpY2FsIHBvbGljeSBVbml0ZWQg
U3RhdGVzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkluc3VyYW5jZSwgSGVhbHRoIFVuaXRlZCBTdGF0ZXM8
L2tleXdvcmQ+PC9rZXl3b3Jkcz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwMTwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjxwdWIt
bG9jYXRpb24+TW9ucm9lLCBNRTwvcHViLWxvY2F0aW9uPjxwdWJsaXNoZXI+Q29tbW9uIENvdXJh
Z2UgUHJlc3M8L3B1Ymxpc2hlcj48aXNibj4xNTY3NTEyMDcwIChwYmsuKSYjeEQ7MTU2NzUxMjA2
MiAoY2xvdGgpPC9pc2JuPjxjYWxsLW51bT5SYTQxMyAuaDU0IDIwMDEmI3hEOzM2Mi4xLzA5NzM8
L2NhbGwtbnVtPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5XYXJy
ZW48L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTk4PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MzIzMTwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+
PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MzIzMTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIg
ZGItaWQ9ImU1dmR3OWR3ZHhzcGRhZWRmdGt2NWR3YmEwcDl4emRyc2R0dCI+MzIzMTwva2V5Pjwv
Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJKb3VybmFsIEFydGljbGUiPjE3PC9yZWYtdHlw
ZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+V2FycmVuLCBNYXJ5IEd1cHRpbGw8L2F1
dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlJvc2UgV2VpdHo8L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlN0ZXBoZW4gS3VsaXM8L2F1
dGhvcj48L2F1dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxlcz48dGl0bGU+UGh5c2ljaWFuIHNh
dGlzZmFjdGlvbiBpbiBhIGNoYW5naW5nIGhlYWx0aCBjYXJlIGVudmlyb25tZW50OiBUaGUgaW1w
YWN0IG9mIGNoYWxsZW5nZXMgdG8gcHJvZmVzc2lvbmFsIGF1dG9ub215LCBhdXRob3JpdHksIGFu
ZCBkb21pbmFuY2U8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBIZWFsdGggYW5k
IFNvY2lhbCBCZWhhdmlvcjwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxm
dWxsLXRpdGxlPkpvdXJuYWwgb2YgSGVhbHRoIGFuZCBTb2NpYWwgQmVoYXZpb3I8L2Z1bGwtdGl0
bGU+PGFiYnItMT5KLiBIZWFsdGggU29jLiBCZWhhdi48L2FiYnItMT48YWJici0yPkogSGVhbHRo
IFNvYyBCZWhhdjwvYWJici0yPjxhYmJyLTM+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBIZWFsdGggJmFtcDsgU29jaWFs
IEJlaGF2aW9yPC9hYmJyLTM+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4zNTYtMzY3PC9wYWdlcz48dm9s
dW1lPjM5PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj4zOTwvbnVtYmVyPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4xOTk4PC95ZWFy
PjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+
ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Himmelstein, Hellander, & Woolhandler, 2001; Warren, Weitz, & Kulis, 1998), we have seen physician resistance and public revulsion. A wave of hospital conversions to for-profit status have increased profits, but has also led to reduced staffing and salary rates, to increased mortality rates ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Picone</Author><Year>2002</Year><RecNum>14322</RecNum><DisplayText>(Picone, 2002)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>14322</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">14322</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Picone, G., Chou, S. Y., & Sloan, F. </author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Are for-profit hospital conversions harmful to patients and to Medicare? </title><secondary-title>RAND Journal of Economics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Rand Journal of Economics</full-title><abbr-1>Rand J. Econom.</abbr-1><abbr-2>Rand J Econ</abbr-2></periodical><pages>1-17</pages><volume>33</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2002</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Picone, 2002), and to public anger. When teachers are subjected to standards imposed by government in the No Child Left Behind and other “reform efforts,” teachers and communities fight back. Law firms have experienced growing turbulence as initiatives for growth, more aggressive marketing, and more individualized performance-based financial rewards have torn the fabric of collegial relations; many prestigious firms have split apart or failed, including the recent, dramatic case of Dewey-Leboeuf. Accounting firm failures (such as Arthur Andersen’s) have been nothing short of extraordinary.Moreover, this rationalization has not addressed a mounting concern that the professions are not only inefficient but also unresponsive to their stakeholders: neither marketization nor bureaucratization has overcome the inward focus of the guild form. Although professions have been primarily legitimated by their claim to serve societal and client needs ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Parsons</Author><Year>1939</Year><RecNum>1228</RecNum><DisplayText>(Parsons, 1939)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1228</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">1228</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Parsons, T</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The professions and social structure</title><secondary-title>Social Forces</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Social Forces</full-title><abbr-1>Soc. Forces</abbr-1><abbr-2>Soc Forces</abbr-2></periodical><pages>457-467</pages><volume>17</volume><dates><year>1939</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Parsons, 1939), clients and social institutions have been increasingly dissatisfied with the results. Patient deference to professional judgment has declined over several decades, a trend accelerated by the rise of the easily available information on the internet ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Fintor</Author><Year>1991</Year><RecNum>15275</RecNum><DisplayText>(Fintor, 1991; Landzelius, 2006)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>15275</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">15275</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Fintor, L.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Patient activism: cancer groups become vocal and politically active</title><secondary-title>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</full-title><abbr-1>J. Natl. Cancer Inst.</abbr-1><abbr-2>J Natl Cancer Inst</abbr-2></periodical><pages>528</pages><volume>83</volume><number>8</number><dates><year>1991</year></dates><isbn>0027-8874</isbn><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Landzelius</Author><Year>2006</Year><RecNum>15276</RecNum><record><rec-number>15276</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">15276</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Landzelius, K.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Introduction: Patient organization movements and new metamorphoses in patienthood</title><secondary-title>Social Science and Medicine</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Social Science and Medicine</full-title><abbr-1>Soc. Sci. Med.</abbr-1><abbr-2>Soc Sci Med</abbr-2><abbr-3>Social Science & Medicine</abbr-3></periodical><pages>529-537</pages><volume>62</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2006</year></dates><isbn>0277-9536</isbn><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Fintor, 1991; Landzelius, 2006). There are strong demands for information on physician performance and greater accountability to the public. Meanwhile, the personal relation between physician and patient has weakened: medical care, as Kuhlman observe ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Kuhlmann</Author><Year>2006</Year><RecNum>15277</RecNum><DisplayText>(Kuhlmann, 2006)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>15277</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">15277</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Kuhlmann, E.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Traces of Doubt and Sources of Trust Health Professions in an Uncertain Society</title><secondary-title>Current Sociology</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Current Sociology</full-title></periodical><pages>607-620</pages><volume>54</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>2006</year></dates><isbn>0011-3921</isbn><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Kuhlmann, 2006) observes, is increasingly “disembodied,” founded on information rather than personal trust. These developments have contributed to the rise of malpractice suits and courts’ gradual acceptance of challenges to medical custom ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Peters Jr</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>15278</RecNum><DisplayText>(Peters Jr, 2000)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>15278</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">15278</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Peters Jr, P.G.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Quiet Demise of Deference to Custom: Malpractice Law at the Millenium, The</title><secondary-title>Wash. & Lee L. Rev.</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Wash. & Lee L. Rev.</full-title></periodical><pages>163</pages><volume>57</volume><dates><year>2000</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Peters Jr, 2000). In university education, a range of constituencies are now questioning the value of research and education. Students (and their parents) have grown less willing to defer to professorial judgment and have become more assertive in demanding justifications for grades and requirements. Student ratings of professors have become popular and influential, undermining the professoriate’s claim of autonomy and guardianship of standards. At primary and secondary levels there has been a substantial “invasion” of teachers’ curricular autonomy by both community school boards and by governmental bodies. One response by professionals to these mounting tensions has been a hardening of the defense of traditional autonomy. While professions have always insisted on independence, this was in the past a positive claim based on special knowledge that was used for the good of society. However, in the last fifty years this insistance has become increasingly a defensive claim, a wall against the claims made by other actors. The emerging contours of collaborative community: Examples from healthcareWe argue that the cause of the current crisis in professionalism is not that professions have left behind the guild model, nor that they have been insufficiently subordinated to market and bureaucracy, but rather that they have not yet developed an organizational form that can effectively buttress their value-rational raison d’être. We argue, further, and against Weber, that this is not an insurmountable problem, although it is certainly a difficult one. In our research, we have documented the emergence over recent decades of a whole family of organizing techniques that can meet this challenge and overcome Weber’s skepticism. We think of these techniques as forming a new type of organizational form for large-scale, value-rational collectivities — a type we call “collaborative community.” In the collaborative community, professional responsibility means a commitment to a higher social purpose and to the organizational systems that supports collaboration in its pursuit. In the following paragraphs, we sketch this new type along four dimensions — norms, values, authority, and economics — using examples from healtchare.Norms. Collaborative communities develop norms that support horizontal coordination of interdependent work processes in a complex division of labor. Traditionalistic guild community relies on what Durkheim ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Durkheim</Author><Year>1997</Year><RecNum>1414</RecNum><DisplayText>(1997)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1414</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">1414</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Durkheim, Emile</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Division of Labor in Society</title></titles><dates><year>1997</year></dates><pub-location>N.Y.</pub-location><publisher>The Free Press</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(1997) calls a mechanical division of labor—pooled in J. D. Thompson’s ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Thompson</Author><Year>1967</Year><RecNum>5970</RecNum><DisplayText>(1967)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>5970</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">5970</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Thompson, James D.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory</title></titles><pages>xi, 192</pages><keywords><keyword>Industrial organization</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1967</year></dates><pub-location>New York</pub-location><publisher>McGraw-Hill</publisher><call-num>Hd38 .t448 1967</call-num><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(1967) terminology—where specialization is limited and coordination relies on norms of inherited practice and status. More complex interdependence can be managed in two ways. One is instrumental-rational contractual, relying on market prices and bureaucratic authority to ensure coordination. This has been developed to a high level in modern industry, but it is not effective in managing complex knowledge interactions requiring high levels of expertise and trust; it is precisely these that are distinctive to the work of professionals. Collaborative community, like bureaucracy, supports interdependence with explicit procedures, but whereas under instrumental-rational, contractual norms these procedures are defined by hierarchical superiors and used by them to monitor performance and drive improvement, under value-rational, collaborative norms the procedures are designed collaboratively and used by peers to monitor each other and to work together to improve performance. In collaborative healthcare organizations, clinical guidelines and pathways may take this form ADDIN ZOTERO_ITEM CSL_CITATION {"citationID":"wHMngQi7","properties":{"formattedCitation":"(Maccoby 2006)","plainCitation":"(Maccoby 2006)"},"citationItems":[{"id":4793,"uris":[""],"uri":[""],"itemData":{"id":4793,"type":"chapter","title":"Health care organizations as collaborative learning communities","container-title":"The Firm as a Collaborative Community: reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy","publisher":"Oxford University Press","publisher-place":"Oxford","event-place":"Oxford","author":[{"family":"Maccoby","given":"Michael"}],"editor":[{"family":"Heckscher","given":"Charles"},{"family":"Adler","given":"Paul S."}],"issued":{"year":2006}}}],"schema":""} (Maccoby 2006). In contrast to the traditionalistic model of the medical staff described by White ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>White</Author><Year>1997</Year><RecNum>6544</RecNum><DisplayText>(1997)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6544</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6544</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>White, C. H. </author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Hospital Medical Staff</title></titles><dates><year>1997</year></dates><pub-location>Albany, NY</pub-location><publisher>Delmar Publishers</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(1997), consider the portrait painted by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of a new health system for the 21st century ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Institute of Medicine</Author><Year>2001</Year><RecNum>6506</RecNum><DisplayText>(Institute of Medicine, 2001)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6506</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6506</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Institute of Medicine,</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century</title></titles><dates><year>2001</year></dates><pub-location>Washington, DC</pub-location><publisher>National Academy Press</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Institute of Medicine, 2001). Where the traditional (and traditionalistic) care delivery model is one in which “individual physicians craft solutions for individual patients” (p. 124), in the model advocated by the IOM the delivery of services is coordinated across practices, settings, and patient conditions over time. Information technology is used as the basic building block for making systems work, tracking performance, and increasing learning. Practices use measures and information about outcomes and information technology to refine continually advanced engineering principles and to improve their care processes (p. 125). Collaborative learning is the heart of the new model. Its procedures support a focus on patient service; utilization management is a responsibility shared by all physicians; information systems support both individual physician decision-making and collective discussion of individual performance differences; strong leaders develop relationships of trust and communicate a vision ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Maccoby</Author><Year>1999</Year><RecNum>6515</RecNum><DisplayText>(Maccoby, 1999)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6515</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6515</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Report">27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Maccoby, M., Margolies, R. Wilson, D., Lenkerd, B., Casey, G.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Leadership for Health Care In the Age of Learning</title><secondary-title>Robert Wood Johnson Foundation report</secondary-title></titles><dates><year>1999</year></dates><urls><related-urls><url>;(Maccoby, 1999). Healthcare organizations such as Intermountain Health Care and the Mayo Clinic exemplify aspects of the emerging model, although neither of them appears to have implemented all its features PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Cb2htZXI8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDAyPC9ZZWFyPjxS
ZWNOdW0+NjA1NTwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oQm9obWVyLCBFZG1vbmRzb24sICZhbXA7
IEZlbGRtYW4sIDIwMDI7IE1hY2NvYnksIDE5OTk7IE1hY2NvYnksIDIwMDYpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4
dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjYwNTU8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5
IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSJlNXZkdzlkd2R4c3BkYWVkZnRrdjVkd2JhMHA5eHpkcnNkdHQiPjYw
NTU8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4x
NzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPlJpY2hhcmQgQm9obWVy
PC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5BbXkgQy4gRWRtb25kc29uPC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5MYXVyYSBS
LiBGZWxkbWFuIDwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRs
ZT5JbnRlcm1vdW50YWluIEhlYWx0aCBDYXJlIDwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5IYXJ2
YXJkIEJ1c2luZXNzIFNjaG9vbCBDYXNlIDwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJp
b2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkhhcnZhcmQgQnVzaW5lc3MgU2Nob29sIENhc2U8L2Z1bGwtdGl0
bGU+PGFiYnItMT5IYXJ2LiBCdXMuIFNjaG9vbCBDYXNlPC9hYmJyLTE+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjx2
b2x1bWU+NjAzLTA2Njwvdm9sdW1lPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4yMDAyPC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVy
bHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPk1hY2NvYnk8L0F1dGhvcj48
WWVhcj4yMDA2PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MTAyOTY8L1JlY051bT48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVy
PjEwMjk2PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0iZTV2
ZHc5ZHdkeHNwZGFlZGZ0a3Y1ZHdiYTBwOXh6ZHJzZHR0Ij4xMDI5Njwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1r
ZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJCb29rIFNlY3Rpb24iPjU8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRv
cnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5NYWNjb2J5LCBNPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjxzZWNvbmRh
cnktYXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkMuIEhlY2tzY2hlcjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+UC5TLiBBZGxl
cjwvYXV0aG9yPjwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LWF1dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxlcz48dGl0
bGU+SGVhbHRoY2FyZSBvcmdhbml6YXRpb25zIGFzIGNvbGxhYm9yYXRpdmUgbGVhcm5pbmcgY29t
bXVuaXRpZXM8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+VGhlIEZpcm0gYXMgYSBDb2xsYWJvcmF0
aXZlIENvbW11bml0eTogUmVjb25zdHJ1Y3RpbmcgVHJ1c3QgaW4gdGhlIEtub3dsZWRnZSBFY29u
b215PC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+VGhl
IGZpcm0gYXMgYSBjb2xsYWJvcmF0aXZlIGNvbW11bml0eTogUmVjb25zdHJ1Y3RpbmcgdHJ1c3Qg
aW4gdGhlIGtub3dsZWRnZSBlY29ub215PC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+
MjU5LTI4MDwvcGFnZXM+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIwMDY8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48cHViLWxvY2F0
aW9uPk94Zm9yZCwgTmV3IFlvcms8L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPk94Zm9yZCBVbml2
ZXJzaXR5IFByZXNzPC9wdWJsaXNoZXI+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0
ZT48QXV0aG9yPk1hY2NvYnk8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTk5PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+NjUxNTwv
UmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+NjUxNTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlz
PjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9ImU1dmR3OWR3ZHhzcGRhZWRmdGt2NWR3YmEwcDl4emRyc2R0
dCI+NjUxNTwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJSZXBvcnQiPjI3PC9y
ZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+TWFjY29ieSwgTS4sIE1hcmdv
bGllcywgUi4gV2lsc29uLCBELiwgTGVua2VyZCwgQi4sIENhc2V5LCBHLjwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0
aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5MZWFkZXJzaGlwIGZvciBIZWFsdGgg
Q2FyZSBJbiB0aGUgQWdlIG9mIExlYXJuaW5nPC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPlJvYmVy
dCBXb29kIEpvaG5zb24gRm91bmRhdGlvbiByZXBvcnQ8L3NlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxl
cz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MTk5OTwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjxyZWxhdGVkLXVybHM+PHVy
bD5odHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hY2NvYnkuY29tL1BUV0MvaGVhbHRoX2ludHJvLmh0bWw8L3VybD48L3Jl
bGF0ZWQtdXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjwvRW5kTm90ZT5=
ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Cb2htZXI8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDAyPC9ZZWFyPjxS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ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Bohmer, Edmondson, & Feldman, 2002; Maccoby, 1999; Maccoby, 2006). Robinson ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Robinson</Author><Year>1999</Year><RecNum>6017</RecNum><DisplayText>(1999)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6017</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6017</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Robinson, James C.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Corporate Practice of Medicine: Competition and Innovation in Health Care</title><secondary-title>California/Milbank series on health and the public</secondary-title></titles><pages>xii, 261 p.</pages><keywords><keyword>Medical corporations United States.</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1999</year></dates><pub-location>Berkeley, Calif.</pub-location><publisher>University of California Press</publisher><isbn>0520220757 (alk. paper)
0520220765 (alk. paper)</isbn><call-num>Law Library R728.2 .R63</call-num><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(1999) describes the mutation under way in these terms: The now passing guild of autonomous physician practices and informal referral networks offered only a cost increasing form of service competition and impeded clinical cooperation among fragmented community caregivers. The joining of physicians in medical groups, either multispecialty clinics or IPAs, opens possibilities for informal consultation, evidence-based accountability, and a new professional culture of peer review. (p. 234) Values. The new model explicitly invokes values of collaborative interdependence ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Silversin</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>6538</RecNum><Prefix>e.g. </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g. Silversin & Kornacki, 2000a; Silversin & Kornacki, 2000b)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6538</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6538</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Silversin, J.</author><author>Kornacki, M.J. </author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Creating a physician compact that drives group success</title><secondary-title>MGM Journal</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>MGM Journal</full-title><abbr-1>MGM J.</abbr-1></periodical><pages>54-62</pages><volume>47</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2000</year><pub-dates><date>May/June 2000</date></pub-dates></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Silversin</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>6539</RecNum><record><rec-number>6539</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6539</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Report">27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Silversin, J.</author><author>Kornacki, M.J.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Leading physicians through change : How to achieve and sustain results</title></titles><dates><year>2000</year></dates><pub-location>Tampa, FL</pub-location><publisher>American College of Physician Executives</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g. Silversin & Kornacki, 2000a; Silversin & Kornacki, 2000b). And this interdependence reaches beyond the boundaries of the profession to embrace interdependence with peers from other professions: surgeons, for example, need to develop more comprehensive collaboration with other physicians (such as anesthesiologists), with lower-status colleagues (nurses, clerical, and janitorial staff), with clients (patients), with administrators (hospitals management), with organized stakeholders (unions, patient rights groups), and with regulators (JCAHO, government). Collaboration circumscribed by guild insularity will not satisfy the demands currently weighing on the professions. A more outward-looking, civic kind of professionalism is needed to embody more fully value-rationality PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5IYXJncmVhdmVzPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwMDwvWWVh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ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5IYXJncmVhdmVzPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwMDwvWWVh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ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Hargreaves, 2000; Sullivan, 2005). Rather than defining and maintaining values through internal processes and traditions, collaborative professions are open to dialogue about their purposes with these outside stakeholders. The professions are thus both value-rational, because they are oriented to ends that represent higher values beyond self-interest, and they are value-rational insofar as those ends are subject to rational discussion based on public standards of validity ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Habermas</Author><Year>1992</Year><RecNum>15172</RecNum><DisplayText>(Habermas, 1992)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>15172</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">15172</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Habermas, J.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Moral consciousness and communicative action</title></titles><dates><year>1992</year></dates><pub-location>Cambridge MA</pub-location><publisher>The MIT Press</publisher><isbn>0262581183</isbn><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Habermas, 1992). This contrasts to the attitude of most professions today: under pressure from outside stakeholders, and seeking to protect themselves against the alien logic of market and bureaucracy, professions often insist that only they can judge the validity of their work, and that they cannot discuss their value-standards with outsiders. This is one reason that professions have become isolated and de-legitimized by the outside world on which they nevertheless rely for funding and regulatory approval. A growing number of hospitals are drawing physicians into collaboration with nurses and other hospital staff to improve cost-effectiveness and quality, often bringing together previously siloed departments in the process ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Gittell</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>3645</RecNum><Prefix>e.g. </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g. Gittell et al., 2000)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>3645</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">3645</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Gittell, J.H.</author><author>K. Fairfield</author><author>B. Bierbaum</author><author>W. Head</author><author>R. Jackson</author><author>M. Kelly</author><author>R. Laskin</author><author>S. Lipson</author><author>J. Siliski</author><author>T. Thornhill</author><author>J. Zuckerman</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, post-operative pain and functioning, and the length of stay: A nine-hospital study of surgical patients</title><secondary-title>Medical Care</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Medical Care</full-title><abbr-1>Med. Care</abbr-1><abbr-2>Med Care</abbr-2></periodical><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">807-819</style></pages><volume>38</volume><number>8</number><dates><year>2000</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g. Gittell et al., 2000). Bate ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Bate</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>10224</RecNum><DisplayText>(2000)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>10224</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">10224</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Bate, P.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Changing the culture of a hospital: From hierarchy to networked community</title><secondary-title>Public Administration</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Public Administration</full-title><abbr-1>Public Admin.</abbr-1></periodical><pages>485-512</pages><volume>78</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2000</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(2000) describes the new form of organization that emerged at one United Kingdom National Health Service hospital as a “network community,” characterized by constructive diversity rather than unity, by transdisciplinary forms of working rather than “tribalism.” Hagen ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Hagen</Author><Year>2005</Year><RecNum>6503</RecNum><DisplayText>(2005)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6503</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6503</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Conference Paper">47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Hagen, B. P, and Epestin, A.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Partnering with your medical staff: Turning competitors into collaborators</title><secondary-title>ACHE Congress on Healthcare Management</secondary-title></titles><dates><year>2005</year><pub-dates><date>March 2005</date></pub-dates></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(2005) describes how Riverside Methodist hospital in Ohio created “clinical operating councils” that brought cross-functional and cross-status groups together to examine improvement opportunities in broad service lines such as primary care, heart, and women’s health. Other hospitals have found that such committees are an ideal vehicle for developing and tracking the implementation of clinical pathways ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Adler</Author><Year>2003</Year><RecNum>6476</RecNum><DisplayText>(Adler et al., 2003; Gittell, 2002)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6476</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6476</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Adler,Paul S</author><author>Riley, P.</author><author>Kwon, Seok-Woo</author><author>Signer, J.</author><author>Lee, B.</author><author>Satrasala, R.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Performance improvement capability: Keys to accelerating improvement in hospitals</title><secondary-title>California Management Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>California Management Review</full-title><abbr-1>Calif. Management. Rev.</abbr-1><abbr-2>Calif Manage Rev</abbr-2></periodical><pages>12-33</pages><volume>45</volume><number>2</number><dates><year>2003</year><pub-dates><date>Winter</date></pub-dates></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Gittell</Author><Year>2002</Year><RecNum>10210</RecNum><record><rec-number>10210</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">10210</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Gittell, Jody Hoffer</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects</title><secondary-title>Management Science</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Management Science</full-title><abbr-1>Management Sci.</abbr-1></periodical><pages>1408-1426</pages><volume>48</volume><number>11</number><dates><year>2002</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Adler et al., 2003; Gittell, 2002). Here, guidelines are not imposed on physicians by insurance companies aiming ruthlessly to cut cost; instead, they are developed collaboratively by teams of doctors, nurses, and technical and administrative staff aiming simultaneously to improve quality and reduce cost. In these new structures, physicians are drawn out of their fiefdoms and beyond their traditional identity as “captain of my ship.” Intermountain Health Care ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Bohmer</Author><Year>2002</Year><RecNum>6055</RecNum><DisplayText>(Bohmer et al., 2002)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6055</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6055</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Richard Bohmer</author><author>Amy C. Edmondson</author><author>Laura R. Feldman </author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Intermountain Health Care </title><secondary-title>Harvard Business School Case </secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Harvard Business School Case</full-title><abbr-1>Harv. Bus. School Case</abbr-1></periodical><volume>603-066</volume><dates><year>2002</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Bohmer et al., 2002) and San Diego Children’s Hospital ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>March</Author><Year>2003</Year><RecNum>10188</RecNum><DisplayText>(March, 2003)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>10188</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">10188</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Report">27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Artemis March</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The business case for clinical pathways and outcomes mangement: A case study of Children's Hospital and Health Cetner of San Diego</title></titles><dates><year>2003</year></dates><publisher>The Commonwealth Fund</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(March, 2003) exemplify such collaborative approaches to pathway development. Beyond the individual organization, “communities of practice” are increasingly being used in lieu of conventional continuing medical education to accelerate learning and diffusion PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5FbmRzbGV5PC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwNTwvWWVhcj48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ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5FbmRzbGV5PC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwNTwvWWVhcj48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ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Endsley, Kirkegaard, & Linares, 2005; Frankford, Patterson, & Konrad, 2000; Parboosingh, 2002). Quality improvement collaboratives have attracted considerable attention as a way to bring together a broader community around specific improvement goals ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Massound</Author><Year>2006</Year><RecNum>10227</RecNum><DisplayText>(Massound et al., 2006; Mills & Weeks, 2004)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>10227</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">10227</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Report">27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Massound, M.R.</author><author>Nielson, G.A.</author><author>Nolan, K</author><author>Nolan, T</author><author>Schall, M.W.</author><author>Sevin, C</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>A framework for spread: From local improvements to system-wide change</title></titles><dates><year>2006</year></dates><pub-location>Cambridge MA</pub-location><publisher>Institute for Healthcare Improvement</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Mills</Author><Year>2004</Year><RecNum>10226</RecNum><record><rec-number>10226</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">10226</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Mills, P.D.</author><author>Weeks, W. B. </author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: Lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA</title><secondary-title>Joint Commission Journal of Quality and Safety</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Joint Commission Journal of Quality and Safety</full-title><abbr-1>Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Safety</abbr-1></periodical><pages>152-162</pages><volume>30</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2004</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Massound et al., 2006; Mills & Weeks, 2004). The most ambitious of these brings together a variety of stakeholders from different hospitals, medical groups, health plans, and employers to learn from each other (Solberg 2005). Authority structure. Collaborative communities equip themselves with distinctive authority structures that enable coordination across multiple dimensions simultaneously. In some of the larger medical groups, governing boards have thus evolving away from simple partnership meetings toward more complex, articulated structures capable of exercising effective group leadership ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Epstein</Author><Year>2004</Year><RecNum>6499</RecNum><DisplayText>(Epstein, Fitzpatrick, & Bard, 2004)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6499</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6499</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Epstein, A.L</author><author>Fitzpatrick, R.</author><author>Bard, M. Jan.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The four stages of development of medical group governing boards</title><secondary-title>Group Practice Management</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Group Practice Management</full-title></periodical><pages>52-56</pages><dates><year>2004</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Epstein, Fitzpatrick, & Bard, 2004). The second aspect of this mutation in authority structures is the changing role of staff functions —?from external control to collaboration. Whereas instrumental-rational bureaucracies use staff functions to formulate and enforce standards backed by the authority of top management, staff at collaborative organizations like Mayo and Intermountain Healthcare work with the line organization to capture and disseminate practice-based knowledge. Where Freidson ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Freidson</Author><Year>1984</Year><RecNum>3806</RecNum><DisplayText>(1984)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>3806</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">3806</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Freidson, Eliot</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The changing nature of professional control</title><secondary-title>Annual Review of Sociology</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Annual Review of Sociology</full-title><abbr-1>Annual Rev. Sociology</abbr-1></periodical><pages>1-20</pages><volume>10</volume><keywords><keyword>professionalism</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1984</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(1984) feared that staff functions would fragment the profession and erode the autonomy of the practitioner, the experience of hospitals such as these suggests that strong collaboration between staff and line organizations is a crucial success factor ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Kwon</Author><Year>2008</Year><RecNum>14364</RecNum><DisplayText>(Kwon, 2008; Tucker & Edmondson, 2003)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>14364</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">14364</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Kwon, Seok-Woo</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Does the standardization process matter? A study of the cost effectiveness of hospital drug formularies</title><secondary-title>Management Science</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Management Science</full-title><abbr-1>Management Sci.</abbr-1></periodical><pages>1065-1079</pages><volume>54</volume><number>6</number><dates><year>2008</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Tucker</Author><Year>2003</Year><RecNum>9958</RecNum><record><rec-number>9958</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">9958</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Tucker, A.</author><author>A. Edmondson</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Why hospitals don't learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change</title><secondary-title>California Management Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>California Management Review</full-title><abbr-1>Calif. Management. Rev.</abbr-1><abbr-2>Calif Manage Rev</abbr-2></periodical><pages>55-72</pages><volume>45</volume><number>2</number><dates><year>2003</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Kwon, 2008; Tucker & Edmondson, 2003). As a result of this reconfigured staff-line relationship, best practices such as disease management programs, quality-oriented practice pattern information, and financial bonuses for quality are far more common in large, integrated medical groups such as Permanente than in the cottage industry of private practitioners in small offices ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Rittenhouse</Author><Year>2004</Year><RecNum>6531</RecNum><DisplayText>(Rittenhouse, Grumbach, O’Neil, Dower, & Bindman, 2004)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6531</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6531</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Rittenhouse, D.R.</author><author>Grumbach, K.</author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">O</style><style face="normal" font="default" charset="129" size="100%">’</style><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Neil, E.H.</style></author><author>Dower, C.</author><author>Bindman, A.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Physician organization and care management in California: From Cottage to Kaiser</title><secondary-title>Health Affairs</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Health Affairs</full-title><abbr-1>Health Aff.</abbr-1><abbr-2>Health Aff</abbr-2></periodical><pages>51-63</pages><volume>23</volume><number>6</number><dates><year>2004</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Rittenhouse, Grumbach, O’Neil, Dower, & Bindman, 2004). Economic structure. Collaborative communities equip themselves to confront the economic implications of their decisions —?implications for professional competencies and incentives — without renouncing their commitments to social values. As concerns competencies, broader interdependencies necessitate training to equip professionals with the requisite technical, social, economic, and managerial skills. As concerns incentives, whereas guild doctors focused exclusively on patient outcomes and refused to engage any discussion about fees or value-for-money, and whereas contractual relations orient professionals in the opposite direction, collaborative healthcare organizations encourage physicians to seek the best patient care while also paying attention to the optimal use of society’s resources. This dual orientation creates tensions for the professional (“dual loyalty”), but in collaborative communities professionals accept that they bear some economic responsibility to society and reject the traditionalistic professional strategy of jurisdictional economic monopoly. This means physicians’ compensation models evolve towards a more complex mix of criteria.Collaborative community in schoolsTeaching is another illuminating case. According to Hargreaves ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Hargreaves</Author><Year>1994</Year><RecNum>10217</RecNum><DisplayText>(1994, 2000)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>10217</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">10217</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Hargreaves, Andy</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers' Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age</title><secondary-title>Teacher development</secondary-title></titles><pages>xvi, 272</pages><keywords><keyword>Teachers.</keyword><keyword>Teachers Attitudes.</keyword><keyword>Teaching Social aspects.</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1994</year></dates><pub-location>London</pub-location><publisher>Cassell</publisher><isbn>0807733407
0304322571 (hardback)
0304322814 (pbk.)</isbn><call-num>Education Library LB1775 .H284</call-num><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Hargreaves</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>10222</RecNum><record><rec-number>10222</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">10222</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Hargreaves, Andy</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Four ages of professionalism and professional learning</title><secondary-title>Teachers and Teaching: History and Practice</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Teachers and Teaching: History and Practice</full-title></periodical><pages>151-182</pages><volume>6</volume><number>2</number><keywords><keyword>Teachers.</keyword><keyword>Teachers Attitudes.</keyword><keyword>Teaching Social aspects.</keyword></keywords><dates><year>2000</year></dates><pub-location>London</pub-location><publisher>Cassell</publisher><isbn>0807733407
0304322571 (hardback)
0304322814 (pbk.)</isbn><call-num>Education Library LB1775 .H284</call-num><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(1994, 2000), teaching once relied on a craft type of community. Beginning in the 1960s, teaching required more advanced degrees and moved into the age of the autonomous professional. Although this brought greater status and higher salaries, it also inhibited innovation by impeding the diffusion of superior practices. By the 1990s, a new age had begun, that of the “collegial” professional. In the current period, the scope of collaboration is broadening, drawing teachers into more active civic engagement with the wider community ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Nixon</Author><Year>1997</Year><RecNum>6571</RecNum><DisplayText>(Nixon, Martin, McKeown, & Ranson, 1997)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6571</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6571</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Nixon, J.</author><author>Martin, J.</author><author>McKeown, P.</author><author>Ranson, S. </author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Towards a learning professional: Changing codes of occupational practice within the new management of education</title><secondary-title>British Journal of Sociology of Education</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>British Journal of Sociology of Education</full-title><abbr-1>Br. J. Sociology Ed.</abbr-1></periodical><pages>5-28</pages><volume>18</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>1997</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Nixon, Martin, McKeown, & Ranson, 1997). This engagement seems emblematic of true value-rationality.The flourishing education literature on “professional learning communities” reflects that transition away from craft and autonomous profession, but it is largely silent on what type of community has replaced them. McLaughlin and Talbert ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>McLaughlin</Author><Year>2001</Year><RecNum>15280</RecNum><DisplayText>(2001)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>15280</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">15280</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>McLaughlin, M.W.</author><author>Talbert, J.E.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Professional communities and the work of high school teaching</title></titles><dates><year>2001</year></dates><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><isbn>0226500713</isbn><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(2001) point out that beyond the distinction between weak communities and strong ones, it is just as important to distinguish between two very different types of strong community — “tradition oriented” and “learning oriented.” Our typology aims to gives this critical distinction greater precision and a stronger theoretical foundation. In our recent work, we have been attempting to test these ideas and explore whether this theoretical foundation is empirically fruitful. We have developed a survey instrument that aims to capture the mix of different types of community at work in any given organization. We have partially validated it through expert surveys and through use in several other contexts. In business contexts, we have found it to predict “ambidexterity,” that is, to the ability of organizations to be both efficient and innovative.We are now using a version of the instrument adapted for the school context in a survey of teachers. The items are listed in Exhibit 1. This should allow us to test the hypothesis that more collaborative the relations within a school — among teachers, between teachers and administrators, and between administrators and unions — the better will be student outcomes. Over the coming months, we hope to gain access to the teachers and outcome data in several school districts.----------- put Exhibit 1 about here ---------Obstacles to collaborative community among professionalsWe should not underestimate the difficulties facing the propagation of this new form of professional organization. On the one hand, the continuing ethos and structures of autonomy among the liberal professions create a powerful counterweight to any move toward the broader and denser interdependencies characteristic of collaborative community. On the other hand, the pressure of instrumental self-interest creates a powerful counterweight to any effort to prioritize higher social purposes. Leape and Berwick ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Leape</Author><Year>2005</Year><RecNum>10208</RecNum><DisplayText>(<style size="11">2005</style>)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>10208</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">10208</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">Leape, L.L.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">D.M. Berwick</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">Five years after ‘To Err is Human’: What have we learned?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">JAMA</style></secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>JAMA</full-title><abbr-1>JAMA</abbr-1><abbr-2>JAMA</abbr-2></periodical><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">2384-2390</style></pages><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">293</style></volume><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">19</style></number><dates><year><style face="normal" font="default" size="11">2005</style></year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(2005) analyze the multiple factors that explain why progress on quality in medicine has been so slow in recent years, and highlight the role of the culture of medicine and its “tenacious commitment to individual, professional autonomy” (p. 2387) as a “daunting barrier to creating the habits and beliefs that a safe culture requires” (p. 2387). Indeed, even when the appropriate formal organizational structures are in place, the new models face deep resistance: Many physicians, however, are individualistic in orientation and do not necessarily enter group arrangements very easily or comfortably. [B]uilding physician groups is a difficult process. Most of the groups visited [in this study] are not well organized—they are groups in name only. Whatever group culture does exist is often oriented to preserving this loose-knit affiliation rather than developing a stronger organization. This culture of “autonomy,” however, is not conducive to building an organization that encourages the development of physician-system integration or care management practices. ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Gillies</Author><Year>2001</Year><RecNum>5334</RecNum><DisplayText>(Gillies et al., 2001)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>5334</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">5334</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Gillies, R. R.</author><author>Zuckerman, H. S.</author><author>Burns, L. R.</author><author>Shortell, S. M.</author><author>Alexander, J. A.</author><author>Budetti, P. P.</author><author>Waters, T. M.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Physician-system relationships: stumbling blocks and promising practices</title><secondary-title>Medical Care</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Medical Care</full-title><abbr-1>Med. Care</abbr-1><abbr-2>Med Care</abbr-2></periodical><pages>I92-106.</pages><volume>39</volume><number>7 Suppl 1</number><keywords><keyword>*Delivery of Health Care, Integrated</keyword><keyword>Female</keyword><keyword>Human</keyword><keyword>*Interprofessional Relations</keyword><keyword>Interviews</keyword><keyword>Male</keyword><keyword>*Managed Care Programs</keyword><keyword>Middle Age</keyword><keyword>*Physicians</keyword><keyword>Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</keyword><keyword>United States</keyword><keyword>Workplace</keyword></keywords><dates><year>2001</year></dates><label>21380480</label><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Gillies et al., 2001) p. 100)Cooper et al. ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Cooper</Author><Year>1996</Year><RecNum>6491</RecNum><DisplayText>(Cooper, Hinings, Greenwood, & Brown, 1996)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>6491</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="e5vdw9dwdxspdaedftkv5dwba0p9xzdrsdtt">6491</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Cooper, D.J.</author><author>Hinings, B.</author><author>Greenwood, R.</author><author>Brown, J.L</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: The case of Canadian law firms</title><secondary-title>Organization Studies</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Organization Studies</full-title><abbr-1>Organ. Stud.</abbr-1></periodical><pages>623-647</pages><volume>17</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>1996</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Cooper, Hinings, Greenwood, & Brown, 1996) delineate the complex dynamics of change in the presence of sedimented organizational archetypes and active resistance. The professional categories whose market and political positions are most entrenched—such as specialist doctors—can mount formidable opposition to the forces of change. This resistance gains strength from professionals and their allies who feel that the attack on the autonomous liberal profession model is an attack on the quality of professional service PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5GaWVsZGluZzwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5OTA8L1llYXI+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ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5GaWVsZGluZzwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5OTA8L1llYXI+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ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Fielding, 1990; Hoff & McCaffrey, 1996; Warren & Weitz, 1999). Despite these resistances and obstacles, collaborative community seems to be a promising way to preserve the core value-rational orientations of the professions in the modern world. It remains to be seen whether this organizational form can flourish or if Weber’s skepticism will prove warranted.Exhibit 1: Survey items for four types of professional community in schoolsTraditionalisticPeople here do things the way they have traditionally been done.Disagreements between grades/departments are resolved by trading favors.When we recruit new people in this organization we look for people who will fit in to our established ways of doing thingsAdministrators here are especially protective of teachers who are loyal to them.Union leaders here are especially protective of members who are loyal to them.Contractual / bureaucratic People work according to policies and procedures defined by supervisors or specialists. Disagreements between grades/departments are handled according to formal policies and proceduresWhen we recruit new people in this organization we look for people who have the right credentials.Administrators here focus on ensuring everyone follows policies and procedures.If there is a conflict between teachers and administrators, union and administration rely on the formal collective bargaining and grievance processes to resolve it.Collaborative People participate in defining and improving the school's policies and procedures.Disagreements between grades/departments are dealt with by peers in rational, open, and direct discussion.When we recruit new people in this organization we look for people who will play an active role in contributing new ideas.Administrators here decide jointly with teachers about both work goals and how best to achieve them.If there is a conflict between teachers and administrators, a labor-management team will be put together and will usually be able to solve it.FragmentedIt is very hard to change policies and procedures even when they are not helping us work effectively.There is a lot of unproductive tension in relations among grades/departments.When we recruit new people in this organization it's hard for these newcomers to get accepted here no matter what they do.Teachers here often see a lot of unproductive tension in relations with administrators.People here see a lot of unproductive conflict between union leaders and administrators. ADDIN EN.REFLIST ReferencesAdler, P. S., Kwon, S., & Heckscher, C. 2008. Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19(2).Adler, P. S., Riley, P., Kwon, S.-W., Signer, J., Lee, B., & Satrasala, R. 2003. Performance improvement capability: Keys to accelerating improvement in hospitals. California Management Review, 45(2): 12-33.Bate, P. 2000. Changing the culture of a hospital: From hierarchy to networked community. Public Administration, 78(3): 485-512.Bechky, B. 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3): 312-330.Bohmer, R., Edmondson, A. C., & Feldman, L. R. 2002. Intermountain Health Care Harvard Business School Case 603-066.Brint, S. G. 1994. In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Cooper, D. J., Hinings, B., Greenwood, R., & Brown, J. L. 1996. Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: The case of Canadian law firms. Organization Studies, 17(4): 623-647.Durkheim, E. 1997. The Division of Labor in Society. N.Y.: The Free Press.Endsley, S., Kirkegaard, M., & Linares, A. 2005. Working together: Communities of practice in family medicine. Family Practice Management, 12(1): 28-32.Epstein, A. L., Fitzpatrick, R., & Bard, M. J. 2004. The four stages of development of medical group governing boards. Group Practice Management: 52-56.Fielding, S. 1990. Physician reaction to malpractice suits and cost containment in Massachusetts. Work and Occupations, 17: 302-319.Fintor, L. 1991. Patient activism: cancer groups become vocal and politically active. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 83(8): 528.Frankford, D. M., Patterson, M. A., & Konrad, R. T. 2000. Transforming practice organizations to foster lifelong learning and commitment to medical professionalism. Academic Medicine, 75(7): 708.Freidson, E. 1984. The changing nature of professional control. Annual Review of Sociology, 10: 1-20.Gaynor, M., D., & Haas-Wilson. 1999. Change, Consolidation, and Competition in Health Care Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1): 141-164.Gillies, R. R., Zuckerman, H. S., Burns, L. R., Shortell, S. M., Alexander, J. A., Budetti, P. P., & Waters, T. M. 2001. Physician-system relationships: stumbling blocks and promising practices. Medical Care, 39(7 Suppl 1): I92-106.Gittell, J. H. 2002. Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Science, 48(11): 1408-1426.Gittell, J. H., Fairfield, K., Bierbaum, B., Head, W., Jackson, R., Kelly, M., Laskin, R., Lipson, S., Siliski, J., Thornhill, T., & Zuckerman, J. 2000. Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, post-operative pain and functioning, and the length of stay: A nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Medical Care, 38(8): 807-819.Habermas, J. 1992. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Hagen, B. P., and Epestin, A. 2005. Partnering with your medical staff: Turning competitors into collaborators, ACHE Congress on Healthcare Management.Halpern, S. A. 1992. Dynamics of professional control: Internal coalitions and crossprofessional boundaries. American Journal of Sociology, 97(4): 994-1021.Hargreaves, A. 1994. Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers' Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age. London: Cassell.Hargreaves, A. 2000. Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: History and Practice, 6(2): 151-182.Heckscher, C., & Adler, P. 2006. The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Himmelstein, D. U., Hellander, I., & Woolhandler, S. 2001. Bleeding the Patient: The Consequences of Corporate Healthcare. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.Hoff, T. J., & McCaffrey, D. P. 1996. Adapting, resisting, and negotiating: How physicians cope with organizational and economic change. Work and Occupations`, 23(2): 165-189.Institute of Medicine. 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Krause, E. A. 1996. Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present. New Haven: Yale University Press.Kuhlmann, E. 2006. Traces of Doubt and Sources of Trust Health Professions in an Uncertain Society. Current Sociology, 54(4): 607-620.Kwon, S.-W. 2008. Does the standardization process matter? A study of the cost effectiveness of hospital drug formularies. Management Science, 54(6): 1065-1079.Landzelius, K. 2006. Introduction: Patient organization movements and new metamorphoses in patienthood. Social Science and Medicine, 62(3): 529-537.Layton, J., Edwin T. 1971. The revolt of the engineers. Cleveland.Leape, L. L., & Berwick, D. M. 2005. Five years after ‘To Err is Human’: What have we learned? JAMA, 293(19): 2384-2390.Light, D., & Levine, S. 1988. The changing character of the medical profession: a theoretical overview. Milbank Q, 66(Suppl 2): 10-32.Maccoby, M. 2006. Healthcare organizations as collaborative learning communities. In C. Heckscher, & P. S. Adler (Eds.), The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy: 259-280. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Maccoby, M., Margolies, R. Wilson, D., Lenkerd, B., Casey, G. 1999. Leadership for Health Care In the Age of Learning, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation report.March, A. 2003. The business case for clinical pathways and outcomes mangement: A case study of Children's Hospital and Health Cetner of San Diego: The Commonwealth Fund.Massound, M. R., Nielson, G. A., Nolan, K., Nolan, T., Schall, M. W., & Sevin, C. 2006. A framework for spread: From local improvements to system-wide change. Cambridge MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement.McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. 2001. Professional communities and the work of high school teaching: University of Chicago Press.Mills, P. D., & Weeks, W. B. 2004. Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: Lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA. Joint Commission Journal of Quality and Safety, 30(3): 152-162.Nixon, J., Martin, J., McKeown, P., & Ranson, S. 1997. Towards a learning professional: Changing codes of occupational practice within the new management of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(1): 5-28.Noble, T., & Pym, B. 1970. Collegial authority and the receding locus of power. British Journal of Sociology: 431-445.Parboosingh, J. T. 2002. Physician communities of practice: Where learning and practice are inseparable. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 22: 230-236.Parsons, T. 1939. The professions and social structure. Social Forces, 17: 457-467.Peters Jr, P. G. 2000. Quiet Demise of Deference to Custom: Malpractice Law at the Millenium, The. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 57: 163.Picone, G., Chou, S. Y., & Sloan, F. . 2002. Are for-profit hospital conversions harmful to patients and to Medicare? . RAND Journal of Economics, 33(3): 1-17.Reed, M. I. 1996. Expert power and control in later modernity: An empirical review and theoretical synthesis. Organization Studies, 17(4): 573-597.Rittenhouse, D. R., Grumbach, K., O’Neil, E. H., Dower, C., & Bindman, A. 2004. Physician organization and care management in California: From Cottage to Kaiser. Health Affairs, 23(6): 51-63.Robinson, J. C. 1999. The Corporate Practice of Medicine: Competition and Innovation in Health Care. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Satow, R. L. 1975. Value-rational authority and professional organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4): 526-531.Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. 2000. Institutional Change and Health Care Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Silversin, J., & Kornacki, M. J. 2000a. Creating a physician compact that drives group success. MGM Journal, 47(3): 54-62.Silversin, J., & Kornacki, M. J. 2000b. Leading physicians through change : How to achieve and sustain results. Tampa, FL: American College of Physician Executives.Sullivan, W. M. 2005. Work and Integrity: The Crisis and Promise of Professionalism in America (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Tucker, A., & Edmondson, A. 2003. Why hospitals don't learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review, 45(2): 55-72.Warren, M. G., & Weitz, R. 1999. The impact of managed care on physicians. Health Care Management Review, 24(2): 44.Warren, M. G., Weitz, R., & Kulis, S. 1998. Physician satisfaction in a changing health care environment: The impact of challenges to professional autonomy, authority, and dominance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39(39): 356-367.Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.White, C. H. 1997. The Hospital Medical Staff. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.Zetka, J. R. 2001. Occupational divisions of labor and their technology politics: The case of surgical scopes and gastrointestinal medicine. Social Forces, 79(4): 1495-1520. ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
Related searches
- technology in schools articles 2018
- technology in schools today impact
- problems in schools today
- music programs in schools statistics
- technology in schools essay
- jobs in schools near me
- technology used in schools today
- complex community in odessa
- healthy foods in schools article
- financial management in schools pdf
- 192 168 1 1 log in admin page netgear
- poorest community in america