MS



MS.06.01.03 – CredentialingInformation specific to the applicant’s current licensure status, training, and current competence must be gathered by the hospital using a defined credentialing process that is based on medical staff recommendations, approved by the governing body, and documented in the medical staff bylaws. Verification must be in writing and must come from the primary source, if possible, or from a CVO. (Note: Joint Commission also includes some designated equivalent sources that may be used in lieu of primary source.)The identity of the applicant must be verified. This can be accomplished by viewing either a current picture hospital ID card or a valid picture ID issued by a state or federal, agency such as a driver’s license or passport.MS.06.01.07 – Analysis and Use of InformationThe medical staff must actually review and analyze all relevant information received regarding current licensure status, training, experience, current competence, and ability to perform the requested privileges through a clearly defined process. The organization develops and consistently applies criteria that will be considered in the decision to grant, limit, or deny a requested privilege. These criteria are based on recommendations by the medical staff and approved by the governing body. Criteria must be directly related to the quality of health care, treatment, and services or, if criteria are not related to quality of care, there must be evidence that the impact of the resulting decisions on the quality of care, treatment, and services has been evaluated. The governing body or its delegated committee has final authority for granting, renewing, or denying privileges. Privileges cannot exceed two years.MS.06.01.09 – Privilege Decision NotificationThe privileging decision must be communicated to the requesting practitioner within a time frame specified in the medical staff bylaws. In the case of a denial, the applicant must be told the reason for denial. The privileging decision must be distributed and made available to all appropriate internal and/or external persons or entities, as defined by the organization and applicable law. The practitioner must be notified of available due process or, when applicable, the option to implement the fair hearing and appeal process.MS.06.01.11 – Expediting the credentialing and privileging processesIf it chooses, the governing body can use an expedited process for initial appointments and for reappointments to the medical staff and when granting privileges. The governing body may delegate these decisions to a committee consisting of at least two voting governing body members. Expedited credentialing may not be used if the applicant’s application is incomplete or the medical staff executive committee makes a final recommendation that is adverse or has limitations. Criteria developed by the medical staff for the expedited process must be followed.The standard lists the following situations that should be evaluated on a case-by-case and would usually lead to ineligibility for expedited credentialing:the applicant has current or previously successful challenge to licensure or registration;the applicant has had an Involuntary termination of medical staff membership or involuntary limitation, reduction, denial, or loss of clinical privileges; orthe applicant has had an unusual pattern of, or an excessive number of, professional liability actions resulting in a final judgment.Note that this standard does not say that these issues definitely make the practitioner ineligible. Joint Commission allows the organization to consider each specific case. MS.10.01.01 – Fair Hearing and Appeals Process for Adverse Privileging DecisionsThe medical staff must have a fair hearing and appeal process for addressing adverse decisions regarding reappointment, denial, reduction, suspension, or revocation of privileges that relate to quality of care, treatment, and service issues. A fair hearing and appeals process allows the practitioner the opportunity to defend him or herself against the adverse action before an unbiased hearing panel of the medical staff. In addition, the practitioner has the opportunity to appeal the decision of the hearing panel to the governing body. The hearing and appeals procedure must be fair and must include a mechanism to schedule a hearing, procedures for the hearing to follow, the composition of the hearing committee as a committee of impartial peers, and a governing body mechanism to appeal adverse decisions. The process may differ for medical staff members and those nonmembers who are granted privileges.MS.07.01.01 – Recommendations for Staff Membership/AppointmentThe medical staff makes recommendations to the governing body for medical staff appointment as part of its oversight of the quality of care, treatment, and services provided by privileged practitioners. The medical staff must develop and utilize criteria for medical staff membership. These criteria should be designed to assure the medical staff and governing body that patients will receive quality care, treatment, and services. Appointments and subsequent reappointments cannot not exceed a period of two years.MS.07.01.03 – Peer RecommendationsThe medical staff must obtain and evaluate peer recommendations when considering appointment and initial grant of privileges and in considering termination from the medical staff, revision, or revocation of clinical privileges. Peer recommendations are obtained from a practitioner in the same professional discipline as the applicant with personal knowledge of the applicant’s ability to practice. A physician must provide the peer recommendation for a physician, dentist for dentist, etc. In situations where there is no peer available for a non-physician applicant, it may be necessary to obtain a reference from a physician with essentially equal qualifications who is familiar with the LIP’s performance. For example, an obstetrician could provide a reference for a nurse midwife. According to Joint Commission, appropriate sources for peer recommendations include:an organization performance improvement committee, the majority of whose members are the applicant’s peers;reference letter(s), written documentation, or documented telephone conversation(s) about the applicant from a peer(s) who is knowledgeable about the applicant’s professional performance and competence;a department or major clinical service chairperson who is a peer; or the medical staff executive committee.On renewal of privileges, if there are insufficient practitioner-specific data available, the medical staff can utilize and evaluates peer recommendations. Peer recommendations must address relevant training, experience, current competence, and any effects of health status on privileges being requested. In addition, peer recommendations must include evaluation of the applicant’s medical knowledge, technical and clinical skills, clinical judgment, communication skills, interpersonal skills, professionalism. MS.06.01.13 – Temporary PrivilegesIssuing temporary clinical privileges can fulfill an important patient care need. For example, if the only physician privileged to perform a highly specialized service becomes ill, disabled, or is otherwise unable to perform this service, a qualified physician may be brought in and given temporary privileges to provide this service while his or her credentials are being reviewed for medical staff membership and delineated clinical privileges. In another example, a recently recruited applicant whose specialized training is needed to perform necessary procedures may be given temporary privileges while his or her credentials are being processed. Joint Commission standards allow the CEO or his or her authorized designee to grant temporary privileges based on the recommendation of the president of the medical staff or authorized designee. The Joint Commission recognizes two circumstances for which the granting of temporary privileges to a licensed independent practitioner would be acceptable – to fulfill an important patient care, treatment, and service need and when an applicant with a complete, clean application that raises no concerns is awaiting review and approval of the medical staff executive committee and the governing body. There are specific requirements for each circumstance.Patient Care NeedTemporary privileges may be granted when there is an important patient care need that mandates an immediate authorization to practice. These privileges are granted for a limited period of time as determined in the bylaws. In these circumstances, temporary privileges may be granted by the CEO upon recommendation of the president of the medical staff. Current licensure and current competence must be verified prior to the granting of privileges. The Healthcare Quality Improvement Act requires the healthcare entity to query the National Practitioner Data Bank prior to granting privileges and individual states and hospitals may have additional requirements. There is no specific time frame listed in the standards, but the medical staff bylaws must document a time period that these privileges would be in effect and this time limit must be followed. New Applicant Awaiting ApprovalFor the new applicant, temporary privileges may be granted by the CEO upon recommendation of the president of the medical staff. Temporary privileges may only be granted for up to 120 days. Prior to granting privileges, there must be verification of current licensure, relevant training or experience, current competence, ability to perform the privileges requested, and any other criteria required by the organization’s medical staff bylaws. The National Practitioner Data Bank query results must have been obtained and evaluated. It is also required that the new applicant has a complete application with no current or previously successful challenge to licensure or registration, has not been subject to involuntary termination of medical staff appointment at another organization, and has not been subject to involuntary limitation, reduction, denial, or loss of clinical privileges. MS.12.01.01– Continuing EducationAll licensed independent practitioners and other practitioners privileged through the medical staff process must participate in continuing education. Each individual’s participation in continuing education must be documented and considered at reappointment and renewal or revision of privileges. Hospital-sponsored educational activities must be prioritized by the medical staff. These activities should relate, at least in part, to the type and nature of care, treatment, and services offered by the hospital and on the findings of performance improvement activities. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download