50-State Property Tax Comparison Study
april 2018
50-State Property Tax Comparison Study
For Taxes Paid in 2017
50-State Property Tax Comparison Study, Copyright ? April 2018 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission from Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence
For information contact: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Department of Valuation and Taxation 113 Brattle Street Cambridge, MA 02138 617-661-3016
Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence 85 East 7th Place, Suite 250 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 651-224-7477
Cover image: ? iStockphoto/kropic
Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible with the cooperation and assistance of many individuals. Research, calculations, and drafting were done by Aaron Twait2 and Adam H. Langley1. The report benefited greatly from feedback provided by Anthony Flint1, Mark Haveman2, Will Jason1, Daphne A. Kenyon1, George W. McCarthy1, Emily McKeigue1, Semida Munteanu1, Andrew Reschovsky1, and Joan M. Youngman1. 1 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 2 Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence
About the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy seeks to improve quality of life through the effective use, taxation, and stewardship of land. A nonprofit private operating foundation whose origins date to 1946, the Lincoln Institute researches and recommends creative approaches to land as a solution to economic, social, and environmental challenges. Through education, training, publications, and events, we integrate theory and practice to inform public policy decisions worldwide. With locations in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C., Phoenix, and Beijing, we organize our work in seven major areas: Planning and Urban Form, Valuation and Taxation, International and Institute-Wide Initiatives, Latin America and the Caribbean, People's Republic of China, the Babbitt Center for Land and Water Policy, and the Center for Community Investment.
About the Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence The Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence was founded in 1926 to promote sound tax policy, efficient spending, and accountable government.
We pursue this mission by educating and informing Minnesotans about sound fiscal policy; providing state and local policy makers with objective, non-partisan research about the impacts of tax and spending policies advocating for the adoption of policies reflecting principles of fiscal excellence.
MCFE generally defers from taking positions on levels of government taxation and spending believing that citizens, through their elected officials, are responsible for determining the level of government they are willing to support with their tax dollars. Instead, MCFE seeks to ensure that revenues raised to support government adhere to good tax policy principles and that the spending supported by these revenues accomplishes its purpose in an efficient, transparent, and accountable manner.
The Center is a non-profit, non-partisan group supported by membership dues. For information about membership, call (651) 224-7477, or visit our web site at .
50-State Property Tax Comparison Study
For Taxes Paid in 2017
Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................6 Why Property Tax Rates Vary Across Cities ...............................................................................9 Homestead Property Taxes........................................................................................................14 Commercial Property Taxes ......................................................................................................19 Industrial Property Taxes ..........................................................................................................24 Apartment Property Taxes.........................................................................................................29 Classification and Preferential Treatment of Homestead Properties ...........................................33 Property Tax Assessment Limits ...............................................................................................40 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 43
Appendix Tables 1. Why Property Tax Rates Vary Across Cities
1a. Factors Correlated with Homestead Property Tax Rates in Large U.S. Cities ................50 1b. Factors Correlated with Commercial Property Tax Rates in Large U.S. Cities ..............53 1c. Correlates of Cities' Effective Tax Rates on Homestead Properties...............................56 1d. Correlates of Cities' Effective Tax Rates on Commercial Properties.............................57 2. Homestead Property Taxes 2a. Largest City in Each State: Median Valued Homes.......................................................58 2b. Largest City in Each State: Median Valued Homes, with Assessment Limits................60 2c. Largest City in Each State: Homes worth $150,000 and $300,000 ................................62 2d. Largest Fifty U.S. Cities: Median Valued Homes .........................................................64 2e. Largest Fifty U.S. Cities: Median Valued Homes, with Assessment Limits...................66 2f. Largest Fifty U.S. Cities: Homes worth $150,000 and $300,000 ...................................68 2g. Selected Rural Municipalities: Median Valued Homes .................................................70 2h. Selected Rural Municipalities: Homes worth $150,000 and $300,000...........................72 3. Commercial Property Taxes 3a. Largest City in Each State ............................................................................................74 3b. Largest Fifty U.S. Cities ...............................................................................................76 3c. Selected Rural Municipalities .......................................................................................78 4. Industrial Property Taxes 4a. Largest City in Each State (Personal Property = 50% of Total Parcel Value) ................80 4b. Largest City in Each State (Personal Property = 60% of Total Parcel Value) ................82 4c. Largest Fifty U.S. Cities (Personal Property = 50% of Total Parcel Value) ...................84 4d. Largest Fifty U.S. Cities (Personal Property = 60% of Total Parcel Value)...................86 4e. Selected Rural Municipalities (Personal Property = 50% of Total Parcel Value) ...........88 4f. Selected Rural Municipalities (Personal Property = 60% of Total Parcel Value) ...........90 4g. Preferential Treatment of Personal Property, Largest City in Each State .......................92 5. Apartment Property Taxes 5a. Largest City in Each State ............................................................................................94 5b. Largest Fifty U.S. Cities ...............................................................................................96 5c. Selected Rural Municipalities .......................................................................................98 6. Classification and Preferential Treatment of Homestead Properties 6a. Commercial-Homestead Classification Ratio for Largest City in Each State...............100 6b. Apartment-Homestead Classification Ratio for Largest City in Each State .................102 7. Impact of Assessment Limits...............................................................................................104
Executive Summary
As the largest source of revenue raised by local governments, a well-functioning property tax system is critical for promoting municipal fiscal health. This report documents the wide range of property tax rates in more than 100 U.S. cities and helps explain why they vary so widely. This context is important because high property tax rates usually reflect some combination of heavy property tax reliance with low sales and income taxes, low home values that drive up the tax rate needed to raise enough revenue, or higher local government spending and better public services. In addition, some cities use property tax classification, which can result in considerably higher tax rates on business and apartment properties than on homesteads.
This report provides the most meaningful data available to compare cities' property taxes by calculating the effective tax rate: the tax bill as a percent of a property's market value. Data are available for 73 large U.S. cities and a rural municipality in each state, with information on four different property types (homestead, commercial, industrial, and apartment properties), and statistics on both net tax bills (i.e. $3,000) and effective tax rates (i.e. 1.5 percent). These data have important implications for cities because the property tax is a key part of the package of taxes and public services that affects cities' competitiveness and quality of life.
Why Property Tax Rates Vary Across Cities To understand why property tax rates are high or low in a particular city, it is critical to know why property taxes vary so much across cities. This report uses statistical analysis to identify four key factors that explain most of the variation in property tax rates.
Property tax reliance is one of the main reasons why tax rates vary across cities. While some cities raise most of their revenue from property taxes, others rely more on alternative revenue sources. Cities with high local sales or income taxes do not need to raise as much revenue from the property tax, and thus have lower property tax rates on average. For example, this report shows that Bridgeport (CT) has one of the highest effective tax rates on a median valued home, while Birmingham (AL) has one of the lowest rates. However, in Bridgeport city residents pay no local sales or income taxes, whereas Birmingham residents pay both sales and income taxes to local governments. Consequently, despite the fact that Bridgeport has much higher property taxes, total local taxes are considerably higher in Birmingham ($2,695 vs. $2,068 per capita).
Property values are the other crucial factor explaining differences in property tax rates. Cities with high property values can impose a lower tax rate and still raise at least as much property tax revenue as a city with low property values. For example, consider San Francisco and Detroit, which have the highest and lowest median home values in this study. After accounting for assessment limits, the average property tax bill on a median valued home for the large cities in this report is $2,992. To raise that amount from a median valued home, the effective tax rate would need to be 24 times higher in Detroit than in San Francisco--6.88 percent versus 0.29 percent.
Two additional factors that help explain variation in tax rates are the level of local government spending and whether cities tax homesteads at lower rates than other types of property (referred to as "classification"). Holding all else equal, cities with higher spending will need to have
1
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- 50 largest property management companies
- crook county property tax records
- baltimore city property tax bill
- pay michigan property tax online
- free property tax records search
- johnson county indiana property tax search
- 50 state trivia printable
- montana property tax homestead exemption
- crook county property tax search
- lincoln county property tax records
- 2020 maryland personal property tax form
- maryland personal property tax return instructions