Storage.googleapis.com



SUMMARY Planning Collaborative CallWednesday, May 20, 2020 12:00pm -12:30pmJurisdictions in Attendance: Milpitas, Los Altos, Los Gatos, Mountain View, Morgan Hill ,Santa Clara (city), Santa Clara County, Gilroy, Saratoga, San Jose, Monte Sereno, Sunnyvale, Campbell, Palo Alto, Los Altos HillsAnnouncementsGovernor’s Budget (no LEAP/REAP money taken out)RHNA 6 PlanNext call for collaboration ideasAFFHCall about new AFFH requirementsWebsite2019 New LawsMethodology DebriefDeadline has slipped (July 2020) Previous meetingsSmall group/teams choose factors (transit, roads, schools, etc) then factors are weighted, map is produced. Most popular factors were equity (30-50%) and jobs (20-60%)Santa Clara County getting a slightly smaller share, but RHNA will still be going up (instead of 5x, maybe 2-3x). DebriefABAG presented two types of methodologies: income shift and ground up way of distributionIncome shift, for ease of explaining, broken down to: Low/Mod and Above Moderate incomeGround Up – Above moderate based on jobs, lower-moderate based on equitySee graphs belowSan Jose thoughts: Ground up has less extremes (San Jose wanted to hear more about this approach)Income shift model has bigger shiftsABAG staff don’t like the Ground Up model, pushed groups not to talk about itHow much do we want lower-income cities to have above moderate targets? Or how much do we want higher income cities to have low-income targets? Wasn’t time to discuss this philosophicallyIf we give high income cities more low-income units, then low income cities will get more high income units. How did they address, if you’re a low-income city, you can want high income units, but the market will only do XYZ? Or if you just up-zone. Anything built by market will just be above mod. Topic came up related to GHG/VMT, because many low-income cities are in east bay and far from jobs. If you put high income units there, will it get built? And you might be putting higher income people further away from higher income jobs, increasing GHG/VMT. Might not be better to put them in EPA/Vallejo/Richmond, rather, closer to high income jobs. And displacing low-income peopleFocus has become more focused on jobs; goal is reducing long-distance commuting. By putting housing next to jobs, will encourage alternative and transit trips to jobs. Three tables with highest votes, one table didn’t have transit at all, other two had low percentage of transit. How are people communicating this information to elected and commissions? What connection does this have to Plan Bay Area – RHNA Methodology has to be consistent or follow PBA. ABAG has said your RHNA number can’t be higher than PBA. What are the key methodology issues? What to expect from HCD – Numbers about 2.5x higher than the last years. Bigger question is how that is split between cities. Has to meet statutory requirements, how to adjust levers, but HCD has to be satisfied that ABAG has met statutory requirements, has to be done, no wiggle room. RHNA should be skewed to where jobs are (Milpitas) over the past decadeSlides and one-page handout for RHNA by BD specific to Santa Clara County.San Jose was planning to do study session, did info memo (Michael to share), once COVID is done. What is RHNA, what to expect, how to meet new state law. BD to add what committee has been discussing. As the South Bay, are we going to discuss the factors as part of methodology and their impacts on the community. One factor in particular, divergence impact indicator, not tied to income, just to race/demographics. But income is layered on top, on web tool it was not layered on. (Demographics was a proxy for income). There are communities of color that are affluent (Milpitas, Cupertino)All the cities in SC are not going to be on HMC, talked generically about our shared principals. And then each city would send individual letters.Cupertino and San Jose on the committee (BD to send email to Neysa, Aarti and San Jose) Cities Association group compared to SCAPO (professional/advisory), might be more appropriate to SCAPOJune 3rd next SCAPO AttendeesAdam Marcus, MilpitasGuido Persicone, Los AltosSharon Goei, MilpitasJoel Paulson, Los GatosAarti Shrivastava, Mountain ViewAdam Paszkowski, Morgan HillAndi Jordan, Cities AssociationAndrew Crabtree, Santa Clara (city)Bharat Singh, Santa Clara CountyCindy McCormick, GilroyDebbie Pedro, SaratogaJared Hart, San JoseJay Lee, MilpitasJ Davidson, Jeannie Hamilton, Monte SerenoJennifer Carman, Morgan HillJenny Carloni, SunnyvaleJulie Wyrick, GilroyMartin Alkire, Mountain ViewMark Shorett, MTC/ABAGPaul Kermoyan, CampbellRachael Tanner, Palo AltoRobertStephen R, CampbellZachary Dahl, Los Altos HillsMichael Brillot, San Jose ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download