Sapajo



Ethical leadership, virtue theory and generic strategies:When the timeless becomes timely Geoffrey G. BellLabovitz School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Minnesota DuluthDuluth, MN 55812-3002Bruno DyckAsper School of BusinessUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB Canada R3T 5V4Mitchell J. NeubertHankamer School of BusinessBaylor UniversityWaco, TX 76798-8006Abstract:Rather than see virtue theory as an approach that is constrained and coopted by the often-unstated materialistic-individualistic assumptions that characterize mainstream consequential utilitarianism, we offer virtue theory as an alternative moral-point-of-view that allows researchers, instructors and leaders to develop theory and practices that challenge the mainstream. We develop a new model of ethical leadership and its relationship to business strategy that is based on virtue ethics rather than consequentialist-utilitarian assumptions. We use Porter’s generic strategy theory as an example, and develop Minimizer, Transformer, and Compounder strategies that reflect virtue theory’s concerns with process and well-being in the context of community.Introduction Despite a long history of reminders, scholars seem prone to forget that ethics are not monolithic. In other words, what it means for a leader to be “ethical” within one ethical moral-point-of-view may be very different from what ethical leadership means within an alternative ethical moral-point-of-view. In particular, what constitutes ethical leadership differs between virtue ethics and consequential utilitarianism. This chapter draws attention to how management theory in general is informed by ethics and moral theories ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Bacharach</Author><Year>1989</Year><RecNum>795</RecNum><Prefix>e.g.`, </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g., Bacharach, 1989)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>795</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">795</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>S B Bacharach</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Organizational Theories: Some criteria for evaluation</title><secondary-title>Academy of Management Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Academy of Management Review</full-title></periodical><pages>496-515</pages><volume>14</volume><number>4</number><keywords><keyword>theory</keyword><keyword>theory building</keyword><keyword>constructs</keyword><keyword>variable</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1989</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g., Bacharach, 1989), and specifically helps to integrate ethical leadership, strategy and virtue theory PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Ib3NtZXI8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTk0PC9ZZWFyPjxS

ZWNOdW0+MjA1NzwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oQmVobmFtICZhbXA7IFJhc2NoZSwgMjAw

OTsgSG9zbWVyLCAxOTk0OyBSb2JlcnRzb24sIDIwMDgpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxy

ZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNTc8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRi

LWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTI5

MDU0Njk2NiI+MjA1Nzwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJKb3VybmFs

IEFydGljbGUiPjE3PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+SG9z

bWVyLCBMYXJ1ZSBUb25lPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+

PHRpdGxlPlN0cmF0ZWdpYyBwbGFubmluZyBhcyBpZiBldGhpY3MgbWF0dGVyZWQ8L3RpdGxlPjxz

ZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+U3RyYXRlZ2ljIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgSm91cm5hbDwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRp

dGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPlN0cmF0ZWdpYyBNYW5hZ2VtZW50

IEpvdXJuYWw8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4xNy0zNDwvcGFnZXM+PHZv

bHVtZT4xNTwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+U3VtbWVyIDE5OTQ8L251bWJlcj48a2V5d29yZHM+PGtl

eXdvcmQ+U3RyYXRlZ3ksIG1vcmFscywgZXRoaWNzLCB0cnVzdCwgY29tbWl0bWVudDwva2V5d29y

ZD48L2tleXdvcmRzPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4xOTk0PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxz

PjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPlJvYmVydHNvbjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIw

MDg8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yMDU4PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4yMDU4PC9y

ZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFl

djhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjEyOTA2MzUzNjQiPjIwNTg8L2tl

eT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVm

LXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPlJvYmVydHNvbiwgQ2hyaXN0b3Bo

ZXIgSi48L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxlcz48dGl0bGU+PHN0

eWxlIGZhY2U9Im5vcm1hbCIgZm9udD0iZGVmYXVsdCIgc2l6ZT0iMTAwJSI+QW4gYW5hbHlzaXMg

b2YgMTAgeWVhcnMgb2YgYnVzaW5lc3MgZXRoaWNzIHJlc2VhcmNoIGluIDwvc3R5bGU+PHN0eWxl

IGZhY2U9Iml0YWxpYyIgZm9udD0iZGVmYXVsdCIgc2l6ZT0iMTAwJSI+U3RyYXRlZ2ljIE1hbmFn

ZW1lbnQgSm91cm5hbDwvc3R5bGU+PHN0eWxlIGZhY2U9Im5vcm1hbCIgZm9udD0iZGVmYXVsdCIg

c2l6ZT0iMTAwJSI+OiAxOTk2LTIwMDU8L3N0eWxlPjwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5K

b3VybmFsIG9mIEJ1c2luZXNzIEV0aGljczwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJp

b2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkpvdXJuYWwgb2YgQnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxl

PjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+NzQ1LTc1MzwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT44MDwvdm9sdW1lPjxr

ZXl3b3Jkcz48a2V5d29yZD5Tb2NpYWwgcmVzcG9uc2liaWxpdHksIGV0aGljcywgc3RyYXRlZ3k8

L2tleXdvcmQ+PC9rZXl3b3Jkcz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwODwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxz

PjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5CZWhuYW08L0F1dGhvcj48WWVh

cj4yMDA5PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MjA2MDwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjA2

MDwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQw

MWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxMjkxMjM0NjAzIj4yMDYw

PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8

L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5CZWhuYW0sIE1pY2hhZWw8

L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlJhc2NoZSwgQW5kcmVhczwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRy

aWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT4mYXBvcztBcmUgc3RyYXRlZ2lzdHMgZnJvbSBNYXJzIGFu

ZCBldGhpY2lzdHMgZnJvbSBWZW51cz8mYXBvczsgLSBTdHJhdGVnaXppbmcgYXMgZXRoaWNhbCBy

ZWZsZWN0aW9uPC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPkpvdXJuYWwgb2YgQnVzaW5lc3MgRXRo

aWNzPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+Sm91

cm5hbCBvZiBCdXNpbmVzcyBFdGhpY3M8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz43

OS04ODwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT44NDwvdm9sdW1lPjxrZXl3b3Jkcz48a2V5d29yZD5ldGhpY2Fs

IHJlZmxlY3Rpb24sIG1vcmFsIGFnZW5jeSwgc3Rha2Vob2xkZXIsIHN0cmF0ZWd5LWV0aGljcyBs

aW5rLCBzdHJhdGVneSBwcm9jZXNzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjwva2V5d29yZHM+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIw

MDk8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjEw

LjEwMDcvczEwNTUxLTAwOC05Njc0LTc8L2VsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVjb3Jk

PjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+AG==

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Ib3NtZXI8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTk0PC9ZZWFyPjxS

ZWNOdW0+MjA1NzwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oQmVobmFtICZhbXA7IFJhc2NoZSwgMjAw

OTsgSG9zbWVyLCAxOTk0OyBSb2JlcnRzb24sIDIwMDgpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxy

ZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNTc8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRi

LWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTI5

MDU0Njk2NiI+MjA1Nzwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJKb3VybmFs

IEFydGljbGUiPjE3PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+SG9z

bWVyLCBMYXJ1ZSBUb25lPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+

PHRpdGxlPlN0cmF0ZWdpYyBwbGFubmluZyBhcyBpZiBldGhpY3MgbWF0dGVyZWQ8L3RpdGxlPjxz

ZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+U3RyYXRlZ2ljIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgSm91cm5hbDwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRp

dGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPlN0cmF0ZWdpYyBNYW5hZ2VtZW50

IEpvdXJuYWw8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4xNy0zNDwvcGFnZXM+PHZv

bHVtZT4xNTwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+U3VtbWVyIDE5OTQ8L251bWJlcj48a2V5d29yZHM+PGtl

eXdvcmQ+U3RyYXRlZ3ksIG1vcmFscywgZXRoaWNzLCB0cnVzdCwgY29tbWl0bWVudDwva2V5d29y

ZD48L2tleXdvcmRzPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4xOTk0PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxz

PjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPlJvYmVydHNvbjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIw

MDg8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yMDU4PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4yMDU4PC9y

ZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFl

djhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjEyOTA2MzUzNjQiPjIwNTg8L2tl

eT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVm

LXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPlJvYmVydHNvbiwgQ2hyaXN0b3Bo

ZXIgSi48L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxlcz48dGl0bGU+PHN0

eWxlIGZhY2U9Im5vcm1hbCIgZm9udD0iZGVmYXVsdCIgc2l6ZT0iMTAwJSI+QW4gYW5hbHlzaXMg

b2YgMTAgeWVhcnMgb2YgYnVzaW5lc3MgZXRoaWNzIHJlc2VhcmNoIGluIDwvc3R5bGU+PHN0eWxl

IGZhY2U9Iml0YWxpYyIgZm9udD0iZGVmYXVsdCIgc2l6ZT0iMTAwJSI+U3RyYXRlZ2ljIE1hbmFn

ZW1lbnQgSm91cm5hbDwvc3R5bGU+PHN0eWxlIGZhY2U9Im5vcm1hbCIgZm9udD0iZGVmYXVsdCIg

c2l6ZT0iMTAwJSI+OiAxOTk2LTIwMDU8L3N0eWxlPjwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5K

b3VybmFsIG9mIEJ1c2luZXNzIEV0aGljczwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJp

b2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkpvdXJuYWwgb2YgQnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxl

PjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+NzQ1LTc1MzwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT44MDwvdm9sdW1lPjxr

ZXl3b3Jkcz48a2V5d29yZD5Tb2NpYWwgcmVzcG9uc2liaWxpdHksIGV0aGljcywgc3RyYXRlZ3k8

L2tleXdvcmQ+PC9rZXl3b3Jkcz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwODwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxz

PjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5CZWhuYW08L0F1dGhvcj48WWVh

cj4yMDA5PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MjA2MDwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjA2

MDwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQw

MWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxMjkxMjM0NjAzIj4yMDYw

PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8

L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5CZWhuYW0sIE1pY2hhZWw8

L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlJhc2NoZSwgQW5kcmVhczwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRy

aWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT4mYXBvcztBcmUgc3RyYXRlZ2lzdHMgZnJvbSBNYXJzIGFu

ZCBldGhpY2lzdHMgZnJvbSBWZW51cz8mYXBvczsgLSBTdHJhdGVnaXppbmcgYXMgZXRoaWNhbCBy

ZWZsZWN0aW9uPC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPkpvdXJuYWwgb2YgQnVzaW5lc3MgRXRo

aWNzPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+Sm91

cm5hbCBvZiBCdXNpbmVzcyBFdGhpY3M8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz43

OS04ODwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT44NDwvdm9sdW1lPjxrZXl3b3Jkcz48a2V5d29yZD5ldGhpY2Fs

IHJlZmxlY3Rpb24sIG1vcmFsIGFnZW5jeSwgc3Rha2Vob2xkZXIsIHN0cmF0ZWd5LWV0aGljcyBs

aW5rLCBzdHJhdGVneSBwcm9jZXNzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjwva2V5d29yZHM+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIw

MDk8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjEw

LjEwMDcvczEwNTUxLTAwOC05Njc0LTc8L2VsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVjb3Jk

PjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+AG==

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Behnam & Rasche, 2009; Hosmer, 1994; Robertson, 2008). It demonstrates that the “preferred” outcomes of a theory depend on the ethical assumptions underlying the theory. We use virtue theory to both develop new leadership and strategy theory and to critique existing understandings of ethical leadership. This is important because virtue theory may be difficult to operationalize in management theory ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2001</Year><RecNum>1889</RecNum><Prefix>e.g.`, </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g., Dyck &amp; Kleysen, 2001)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1889</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1889</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Kleysen, R.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Aristotle&apos;s virtues and management thought: An empirical exploration of an integrative pedagogy</title><secondary-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</full-title></periodical><pages>561-574</pages><volume>11</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>2001</year></dates><urls></urls><electronic-resource-num>10.2307/3857761</electronic-resource-num></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g., Dyck & Kleysen, 2001), and the application of virtue theory to strategy is rare PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Bcmpvb248L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDAwPC9ZZWFyPjxS

ZWNOdW0+MjAyMTwvUmVjTnVtPjxQcmVmaXg+bm90YWJsZSBleGNlcHRpb25zIGluY2x1ZGUgPC9Q

cmVmaXg+PERpc3BsYXlUZXh0Pihub3RhYmxlIGV4Y2VwdGlvbnMgaW5jbHVkZSBBcmpvb24sIDIw

MDA7IEJlbGwgJmFtcDsgRHljaywgMjAxMTsgS3JzdG8gJmFtcDsgRWxsd29vZCwgMjAxMyk8L0Rp

c3BsYXlUZXh0PjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjAyMTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1r

ZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRk

dnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxMjg4MjgzMDg0Ij4yMDIxPC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJl

Zi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+

PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5Bcmpvb24sIFN1cmVuZHJhPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29u

dHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPlZpcnR1ZSB0aGVvcnkgYXMgYSBkeW5hbWljIHRoZW9y

eSBvZiBidXNpbmVzczwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5Kb3VybmFsIG9mIEJ1c2luZXNz

IEV0aGljczwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxl

PkpvdXJuYWwgb2YgQnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFn

ZXM+MTU5LTE3ODwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT4yODwvdm9sdW1lPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4yMDAwPC95

ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPkJl

bGw8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDExPC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MTk2OTwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+

PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MTk2OTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIg

ZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIx

MjgyODM1NjU4Ij4xOTY5PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJu

YWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5C

ZWxsLCBHZW9mZnJleSBHLjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+RHljaywgQnJ1bm88L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1

dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxlcz48dGl0bGU+Q29udmVudGlvbmFsIHJlc291cmNl

LWJhc2VkIHRoZW9yeSBhbmQgaXRzIHJhZGljYWwgYWx0ZXJuYXRpdmU6IEEgbGVzcyBtYXRlcmlh

bGlzdC1pbmRpdmlkdWFsaXN0IGFwcHJvYWNoIHRvIHN0cmF0ZWd5PC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5

LXRpdGxlPkpvdXJuYWwgb2YgQnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRs

ZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBCdXNpbmVzcyBFdGhpY3M8L2Z1

bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4xMjEtMTMwPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjk5PC92

b2x1bWU+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIwMTE8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0

cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjEwLjEwMDcvczEwNTUxLTAxMS0xMTU5LTQ8L2VsZWN0cm9uaWMt

cmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPktyc3RvPC9BdXRob3I+

PFllYXI+MjAxMzwvWWVhcj48UmVjTnVtPjI2ODQ8L1JlY051bT48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVy

PjI2ODQ8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMw

ZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTQzODYyMzQ2NCI+

MjY4NDwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJKb3VybmFsIEFydGljbGUi

PjE3PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+S3JzdG8sIFBhbmR6

YTwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+RWxsd29vZCwgUGF1bDwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRy

aWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5TdHJhdGVnaWMgYW5kIGV0aGljYWwgZm91bmRhdGlvbnMg

Zm9yIHJlc3BvbnNpYmxlIGlubm92YXRpb248L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+UmVzZWFy

Y2ggUG9saWN5PC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0

bGU+UmVzZWFyY2ggUG9saWN5PC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+MTExMi0x

MTI1PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjQyPC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj41PC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5

ZWFyPjIwMTM8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjwvRW5k

Tm90ZT4A

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Bcmpvb248L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDAwPC9ZZWFyPjxS

ZWNOdW0+MjAyMTwvUmVjTnVtPjxQcmVmaXg+bm90YWJsZSBleGNlcHRpb25zIGluY2x1ZGUgPC9Q

cmVmaXg+PERpc3BsYXlUZXh0Pihub3RhYmxlIGV4Y2VwdGlvbnMgaW5jbHVkZSBBcmpvb24sIDIw

MDA7IEJlbGwgJmFtcDsgRHljaywgMjAxMTsgS3JzdG8gJmFtcDsgRWxsd29vZCwgMjAxMyk8L0Rp

c3BsYXlUZXh0PjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjAyMTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1r

ZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRk

dnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxMjg4MjgzMDg0Ij4yMDIxPC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJl

Zi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+

PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5Bcmpvb24sIFN1cmVuZHJhPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29u

dHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPlZpcnR1ZSB0aGVvcnkgYXMgYSBkeW5hbWljIHRoZW9y

eSBvZiBidXNpbmVzczwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5Kb3VybmFsIG9mIEJ1c2luZXNz

IEV0aGljczwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxl

PkpvdXJuYWwgb2YgQnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFn

ZXM+MTU5LTE3ODwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT4yODwvdm9sdW1lPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4yMDAwPC95

ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPkJl

bGw8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDExPC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MTk2OTwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+

PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MTk2OTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIg

ZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIx

MjgyODM1NjU4Ij4xOTY5PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJu

YWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5C

ZWxsLCBHZW9mZnJleSBHLjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+RHljaywgQnJ1bm88L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1

dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxlcz48dGl0bGU+Q29udmVudGlvbmFsIHJlc291cmNl

LWJhc2VkIHRoZW9yeSBhbmQgaXRzIHJhZGljYWwgYWx0ZXJuYXRpdmU6IEEgbGVzcyBtYXRlcmlh

bGlzdC1pbmRpdmlkdWFsaXN0IGFwcHJvYWNoIHRvIHN0cmF0ZWd5PC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5

LXRpdGxlPkpvdXJuYWwgb2YgQnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRs

ZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBCdXNpbmVzcyBFdGhpY3M8L2Z1

bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4xMjEtMTMwPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjk5PC92

b2x1bWU+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIwMTE8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0

cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjEwLjEwMDcvczEwNTUxLTAxMS0xMTU5LTQ8L2VsZWN0cm9uaWMt

cmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPktyc3RvPC9BdXRob3I+

PFllYXI+MjAxMzwvWWVhcj48UmVjTnVtPjI2ODQ8L1JlY051bT48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVy

PjI2ODQ8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMw

ZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTQzODYyMzQ2NCI+

MjY4NDwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJKb3VybmFsIEFydGljbGUi

PjE3PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+S3JzdG8sIFBhbmR6

YTwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+RWxsd29vZCwgUGF1bDwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRy

aWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5TdHJhdGVnaWMgYW5kIGV0aGljYWwgZm91bmRhdGlvbnMg

Zm9yIHJlc3BvbnNpYmxlIGlubm92YXRpb248L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+UmVzZWFy

Y2ggUG9saWN5PC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0

bGU+UmVzZWFyY2ggUG9saWN5PC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+MTExMi0x

MTI1PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjQyPC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj41PC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5

ZWFyPjIwMTM8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjwvRW5k

Tm90ZT4A

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (notable exceptions include Arjoon, 2000; Bell & Dyck, 2011; Krsto & Ellwood, 2013). The chapter lies at the intersection of four literatures: ethics, leadership, virtue theory, and strategic management. It contrasts and compares a generic strategy framework associated with consequential utilitarianism (Generic Strategy 1.0) with one based upon virtue theory (Generic Strategy 2.0). We pay particular attention to the capacity of virtue-based generic strategy to address socio-ecological challenges facing humankind. We exemplify this by developing a virtue theory-based model of generic strategies. Finally, we discuss the implications for a virtue theory understanding of ethical leadership and strategy. Meta-theory, ethics and virtue theory ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite AuthorYear="1"><Author>Weber</Author><Year>1958</Year><RecNum>1842</RecNum><DisplayText>Weber (1958)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1842</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1842</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Weber, Max</author></authors><subsidiary-authors><author>Parsons, T.</author></subsidiary-authors></contributors><titles><title>The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism</title></titles><dates><year>1958</year></dates><pub-location>New York</pub-location><publisher>Scribner&apos;s</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>Weber (1958) argued that the formal rationality associated with capitalism was underpinned by the substantive rationality associated with the Protestant ethic, which differed from and replaced society’s previously-dominant substantive rationality ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2005</Year><RecNum>1825</RecNum><DisplayText>(Dyck &amp; Schroeder, 2005)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1825</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1825</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Schroeder, David</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Management, theology and moral points of view: Towards an altnerative to the conventional materialist-individualistic ideal-type of management</title><secondary-title>Journal of Management Studies</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Management Studies</full-title></periodical><pages>705-735</pages><volume>42</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>2005</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Dyck & Schroeder, 2005). Implicit in Weber’s analysis is the idea that differing “substantive rationalities” (e.g., moral-points-of-view, such as consequential utilitarianism and virtue theory) would produce differing “formal rationalities” (e.g., alternative conceptions of ethical leadership). According to ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite AuthorYear="1"><Author>Weber</Author><Year>1958</Year><RecNum>1842</RecNum><DisplayText>Weber (1958)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1842</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1842</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Weber, Max</author></authors><subsidiary-authors><author>Parsons, T.</author></subsidiary-authors></contributors><titles><title>The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism</title></titles><dates><year>1958</year></dates><pub-location>New York</pub-location><publisher>Scribner&apos;s</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>Weber (1958), modern corporations are no longer being managed based on a religious Protestant ethic, but rather this ethic has been secularized and replaced by what we today might call “consequential utilitarianism” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2005</Year><RecNum>1825</RecNum><DisplayText>(Dyck &amp; Neubert, 2010; Dyck &amp; Schroeder, 2005)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1825</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1825</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Schroeder, David</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Management, theology and moral points of view: Towards an altnerative to the conventional materialist-individualistic ideal-type of management</title><secondary-title>Journal of Management Studies</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Management Studies</full-title></periodical><pages>705-735</pages><volume>42</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>2005</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2010</Year><RecNum>1848</RecNum><record><rec-number>1848</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1848</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Neubert, M.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Management: Current Practices and New Directions</title></titles><dates><year>2010</year></dates><pub-location>Boston</pub-location><publisher>Cengage / Houghton Mifflin</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Dyck & Neubert, 2010; Dyck & Schroeder, 2005). The historical roots of consequential utilitarianism—developed by the likes of Jeremy Bentham, David Hume, James Mill, and John Stuart Mill—emphasize how desirable (i.e., ethically commendable) outcomes of an action are ones that generate the largest net benefit (including positive and negative externalities) for most people associated with the action ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Gandz</Author><Year>1988</Year><RecNum>2751</RecNum><Prefix>e.g.`, </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g., Gandz &amp; Hayes, 1988; McKay, 2000)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2751</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456934546">2751</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Gandz, J.</author><author>Hayes, N.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Teaching business ethics</title><secondary-title>Journal of Business Ethics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Business Ethics</full-title></periodical><pages>657-669</pages><volume>7</volume><number>9</number><dates><year>1988</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>McKay</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>2752</RecNum><record><rec-number>2752</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456934649">2752</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>McKay, R. B.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Consequential uitilitarianism: Addressing ethical deficiencies in the municipal landfill siting process</title><secondary-title>Journal of Business Ethics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Business Ethics</full-title></periodical><pages>289-306</pages><volume>26</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>2000</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g., Gandz & Hayes, 1988; McKay, 2000). Over time, a short-hand version of mainstream consequential utilitarianism in business theory and practice has developed focusing on measuring the outcomes of actions in terms of their financial costs and benefits (where money serves as a proxy capturing most of the other costs and benefits) at the firm level of analysis (consistent with a popularized understanding of “the invisible hand,” where what is good for a business is good for society) ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Smith</Author><Year>1986 [1776]</Year><RecNum>1893</RecNum><DisplayText>(Dyck &amp; Neubert, 2010; Gustafson, 2013; Smith, 1986 [1776])</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1893</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1893</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Smith, Adam</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Wealth of Nations: Books I-III</title></titles><pages>537</pages><dates><year>1986 [1776]</year></dates><pub-location>London, UK</pub-location><publisher>Penguin Books</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2010</Year><RecNum>1848</RecNum><record><rec-number>1848</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1848</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Neubert, M.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Management: Current Practices and New Directions</title></titles><dates><year>2010</year></dates><pub-location>Boston</pub-location><publisher>Cengage / Houghton Mifflin</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Gustafson</Author><Year>2013</Year><RecNum>2753</RecNum><record><rec-number>2753</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456934801">2753</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Gustafson, A.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>In defense of a utilitarian business ethic</title><secondary-title>Business and Society Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Business and Society Review</full-title></periodical><pages>325-360</pages><volume>118</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2013</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Dyck & Neubert, 2010; Gustafson, 2013; Smith, 1986 [1776]). Weber was not the first to note that one’s moral-point-of-view would give rise to specific associated ways of organizing and understanding of ethical leadership. In particular, already two and a half millennia ago Aristotle and his Greek contemporaries recognized that the “economy is intelligible only as an ethical dilemma” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Booth</Author><Year>1993</Year><RecNum>2760</RecNum><Suffix>:8 cited in</Suffix><DisplayText>(Booth, 1993:8 cited in; Leshem, 2016: 231)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2760</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456944144">2760</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Booth, W. J.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Households: The moral architecture of the economy</title></titles><dates><year>1993</year></dates><pub-location>Ithaca, NY</pub-location><publisher>Cornell University Press</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Leshem</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>2755</RecNum><Suffix>: 231</Suffix><record><rec-number>2755</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456936713">2755</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Leshem, D.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Retrospectives: What did the ancient Greeks mean by </style><style face="italic" font="default" size="100%">oikonomia?</style></title><secondary-title>Journal of Economic Perspectives</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Economic Perspectives</full-title></periodical><pages>225-238</pages><volume>30</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Booth, 1993:8 cited in; Leshem, 2016: 231), and they debated about organizational strategies and leadership practices that were “formally rational” vis a vis the “substantive rationality” of virtue theory ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Solomon</Author><Year>1992</Year><RecNum>2013</RecNum><DisplayText>(Arjoon, 2000; Solomon, 1992)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2013</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1287775299">2013</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Solomon, Robert C.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics</title><secondary-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</full-title></periodical><pages>317-339</pages><volume>2</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>1992</year></dates><urls></urls><electronic-resource-num>10.2307/3857536</electronic-resource-num></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Arjoon</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>2021</RecNum><record><rec-number>2021</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1288283084">2021</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Arjoon, Surendra</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business</title><secondary-title>Journal of Business Ethics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Business Ethics</full-title></periodical><pages>159-178</pages><volume>28</volume><dates><year>2000</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Arjoon, 2000; Solomon, 1992). Aristotelian virtue theory has at least three hallmarks that differentiate it from mainstream consequential utilitarianism. Virtue theory emphasizes: virtues (versus outcomes), holistic well-being (versus maximized financial well-being) and the larger community (versus the firm). We discuss each in turn.First, virtue theory focuses on processes more than on outcomes. For example, it focuses on the leader’s character, not accomplishments. Virtue theory’s emphasis on character and the practice of virtues contrasts with consequential utilitarian ethics. From a consequential utilitarian approach it is unethical for leaders to allow process to impede the maximization of outcomes, which comes perilously close to saying the ends justifies the means. Conversely, from a virtue theory perspective it is unethical for leaders to focus on outcomes at the expense of their everyday practice of virtues. That said, while virtue theory focuses on the internal sphere, it also clearly influences the outer sphere ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>MacIntyre</Author><Year>1981</Year><RecNum>1576</RecNum><DisplayText>(MacIntyre, 1981)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1576</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1576</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>MacIntyre, Alasdair</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>After virtue: A study in moral theory</title></titles><dates><year>1981</year></dates><pub-location>Notre Dame, Indiana</pub-location><publisher>University of Notre Dame Press</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(MacIntyre, 1981). In this way the processes and character of leadership may be observed in organizational practices and outcomes. Thus organizational practices that are developed based on virtue theory can subsequently influence the character of organizational members who work within those structures and systems ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2010</Year><RecNum>2754</RecNum><DisplayText>(Dyck &amp; Wong, 2010)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2754</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456935944">2754</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Wong, K.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Corporate spiritual disciplines and the quest for organizational virtue</title><secondary-title>Journal of Management, Spirituality &amp; Religion</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Management, Spirituality &amp; Religion</full-title></periodical><pages>7-29</pages><volume>7</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>2010</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Dyck & Wong, 2010).Second, whereas consequential utilitarianism implies that “more is better” (e.g., firms should grow in size and profits), virtue theory emphasizes knowing when “enough is enough,” and moreover asserts that there is enough to sustain everyone ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Leshem</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>2755</RecNum><Suffix>: 226</Suffix><DisplayText>(Leshem, 2016: 226)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2755</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456936713">2755</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Leshem, D.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Retrospectives: What did the ancient Greeks mean by </style><style face="italic" font="default" size="100%">oikonomia?</style></title><secondary-title>Journal of Economic Perspectives</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Economic Perspectives</full-title></periodical><pages>225-238</pages><volume>30</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Leshem, 2016: 226). Rather than assume that it is inherently good (ethical) to increase economic wealth endlessly, Aristotelian virtue ethics “call[s] into question the pursuit of economic goals as an end in and for themselves” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Leshem</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>2755</RecNum><Suffix>: 236</Suffix><DisplayText>(Leshem, 2016: 236)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2755</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456936713">2755</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Leshem, D.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Retrospectives: What did the ancient Greeks mean by </style><style face="italic" font="default" size="100%">oikonomia?</style></title><secondary-title>Journal of Economic Perspectives</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Economic Perspectives</full-title></periodical><pages>225-238</pages><volume>30</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Leshem, 2016: 236) and assert “that a luxurious life (as well as an unending focus on economic life) is a perversion of the good life” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Leshem</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>2755</RecNum><Suffix>: 233</Suffix><DisplayText>(Leshem, 2016: 233)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2755</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456936713">2755</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Leshem, D.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Retrospectives: What did the ancient Greeks mean by </style><style face="italic" font="default" size="100%">oikonomia?</style></title><secondary-title>Journal of Economic Perspectives</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Economic Perspectives</full-title></periodical><pages>225-238</pages><volume>30</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Leshem, 2016: 233). In particular, Aristotle distinguished between pursuing economic wealth for its own sake (unnatural chrematistics) versus economic activity that enhances the overall good for the larger community (natural chrematistics) PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5BcmlzdG90bGU8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDAwPC9ZZWFy

PjxSZWNOdW0+MjA3MzwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oQXJpc3RvdGxlLCAyMDAwOyBDcmVz

cG8sIDIwMDg7IER5Y2ssIDIwMTNhOyBNZWlrbGUsIDE5OTQpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3Jk

PjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNzM8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4i

IGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0i

MTI5NDI1MTYxNyI+MjA3Mzwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJCb29r

Ij42PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+QXJpc3RvdGxlPC9h

dXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjxzdWJzaWRpYXJ5LWF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5CZW5qYW1pbiBKb3dl

dHQ8L2F1dGhvcj48L3N1YnNpZGlhcnktYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0

aXRsZT5Qb2xpdGljczwvdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBhZ2VzPjM1NTwvcGFnZXM+PGRhdGVzPjx5

ZWFyPjIwMDA8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48cHViLWxvY2F0aW9uPk1pbmVvbGEsIE5ZPC9wdWItbG9j

YXRpb24+PHB1Ymxpc2hlcj5Eb3ZlciBQdWJsaWNhdGlvbnMgSW5jLjwvcHVibGlzaGVyPjx1cmxz

PjxyZWxhdGVkLXVybHM+PHVybD5odHRwOi8vY2xhc3NpY3MubWl0LmVkdS9BcmlzdG90bGUvcG9s

aXRpY3MuaHRtbDwvdXJsPjwvcmVsYXRlZC11cmxzPjwvdXJscz48YWNjZXNzLWRhdGU+QXByaWwg

MjksIDIwMDk8L2FjY2Vzcy1kYXRlPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPkNyZXNw

bzwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDg8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yNzU2PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48

cmVjLW51bWJlcj4yNzU2PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBk

Yi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjE0

NTY5MzcxNDQiPjI3NTY8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iVW5wdWJs

aXNoZWQgV29yayI+MzQ8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5D

cmVzcG8sIFIuIEYuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRp

dGxlPk9uIEFyaXN0b3RsZSBhbmQgZWNvbm9taWNzPC90aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48ZGF0ZXM+PHll

YXI+MjAwODwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjxwdWItbG9jYXRpb24+QnVlbm9zIEFyaWVzIFByb3ZpbmNl

LCBBcmdlbnRpbmE8L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPklBRSBCdXNpbmVzcyBTY2hvb2ws

IEF1c3RyYWwgVW5pdmVyc2l0eTwvcHVibGlzaGVyPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0Np

dGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5EeWNrPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAxMzwvWWVhcj48UmVjTnVtPjI3

NTc8L1JlY051bT48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjI3NTc8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24t

a2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0

ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTQ1NjkzNzIzOSI+Mjc1Nzwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxy

ZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJCb29rIj42PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxh

dXRob3I+RHljaywgQnJ1bm88L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxl

cz48dGl0bGU+TWFuYWdlbWVudCBhbmQgdGhlIEdvc3BlbDogTHVrZSZhcG9zO3MgcmFkaWNhbCBt

ZXNzYWdlIGZvciB0aGUgZmlyc3QgYW5kIHR3ZW50eS1maXJzdCBjZW50dXJpZXM8L3RpdGxlPjwv

dGl0bGVzPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4yMDEzPC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHB1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj5OZXcg

WW9yaywgTlk8L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPlBhbGdyYXZlLU1hY21pbGxhbjwvcHVi

bGlzaGVyPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5NZWlrbGU8

L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTk0PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+Mjc1ODwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJl

Yy1udW1iZXI+Mjc1ODwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGIt

aWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDU2

OTM3Mjk1Ij4yNzU4PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwg

QXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5NZWlr

bGUsIFMuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkFy

aXN0b3RsZSBvbiBtb25leTwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5QaHJvbmVzaXM8L3NlY29u

ZGFyeS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5QaHJvbmVzaXM8L2Z1

bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4yNi00NDwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT4zOTwvdm9s

dW1lPjxudW1iZXI+MTwvbnVtYmVyPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4xOTk0PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVy

bHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5BcmlzdG90bGU8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDAwPC9ZZWFy

PjxSZWNOdW0+MjA3MzwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oQXJpc3RvdGxlLCAyMDAwOyBDcmVz

cG8sIDIwMDg7IER5Y2ssIDIwMTNhOyBNZWlrbGUsIDE5OTQpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3Jk

PjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNzM8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4i

IGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0i

MTI5NDI1MTYxNyI+MjA3Mzwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJCb29r

Ij42PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+QXJpc3RvdGxlPC9h

dXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjxzdWJzaWRpYXJ5LWF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5CZW5qYW1pbiBKb3dl

dHQ8L2F1dGhvcj48L3N1YnNpZGlhcnktYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0

aXRsZT5Qb2xpdGljczwvdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBhZ2VzPjM1NTwvcGFnZXM+PGRhdGVzPjx5

ZWFyPjIwMDA8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48cHViLWxvY2F0aW9uPk1pbmVvbGEsIE5ZPC9wdWItbG9j

YXRpb24+PHB1Ymxpc2hlcj5Eb3ZlciBQdWJsaWNhdGlvbnMgSW5jLjwvcHVibGlzaGVyPjx1cmxz

PjxyZWxhdGVkLXVybHM+PHVybD5odHRwOi8vY2xhc3NpY3MubWl0LmVkdS9BcmlzdG90bGUvcG9s

aXRpY3MuaHRtbDwvdXJsPjwvcmVsYXRlZC11cmxzPjwvdXJscz48YWNjZXNzLWRhdGU+QXByaWwg

MjksIDIwMDk8L2FjY2Vzcy1kYXRlPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPkNyZXNw

bzwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDg8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yNzU2PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48

cmVjLW51bWJlcj4yNzU2PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBk

Yi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjE0

NTY5MzcxNDQiPjI3NTY8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iVW5wdWJs

aXNoZWQgV29yayI+MzQ8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5D

cmVzcG8sIFIuIEYuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRp

dGxlPk9uIEFyaXN0b3RsZSBhbmQgZWNvbm9taWNzPC90aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48ZGF0ZXM+PHll

YXI+MjAwODwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjxwdWItbG9jYXRpb24+QnVlbm9zIEFyaWVzIFByb3ZpbmNl

LCBBcmdlbnRpbmE8L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPklBRSBCdXNpbmVzcyBTY2hvb2ws

IEF1c3RyYWwgVW5pdmVyc2l0eTwvcHVibGlzaGVyPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0Np

dGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5EeWNrPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAxMzwvWWVhcj48UmVjTnVtPjI3

NTc8L1JlY051bT48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjI3NTc8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24t

a2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0

ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTQ1NjkzNzIzOSI+Mjc1Nzwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxy

ZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJCb29rIj42PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxh

dXRob3I+RHljaywgQnJ1bm88L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxl

cz48dGl0bGU+TWFuYWdlbWVudCBhbmQgdGhlIEdvc3BlbDogTHVrZSZhcG9zO3MgcmFkaWNhbCBt

ZXNzYWdlIGZvciB0aGUgZmlyc3QgYW5kIHR3ZW50eS1maXJzdCBjZW50dXJpZXM8L3RpdGxlPjwv

dGl0bGVzPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4yMDEzPC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHB1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj5OZXcg

WW9yaywgTlk8L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPlBhbGdyYXZlLU1hY21pbGxhbjwvcHVi

bGlzaGVyPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5NZWlrbGU8

L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTk0PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+Mjc1ODwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJl

Yy1udW1iZXI+Mjc1ODwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGIt

aWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDU2

OTM3Mjk1Ij4yNzU4PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwg

QXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5NZWlr

bGUsIFMuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkFy

aXN0b3RsZSBvbiBtb25leTwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5QaHJvbmVzaXM8L3NlY29u

ZGFyeS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5QaHJvbmVzaXM8L2Z1

bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4yNi00NDwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT4zOTwvdm9s

dW1lPjxudW1iZXI+MTwvbnVtYmVyPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4xOTk0PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVy

bHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Aristotle, 2000; Crespo, 2008; Dyck, 2013a; Meikle, 1994). Natural chrematistics is evident when someone trades goods for money that is subsequently used to purchase other needed goods. This creates “true wealth” in a community among members who are contributing tangible goods to its well-being. In contrast, unnatural chrematistics is evident when someone uses money to purchase goods in order to resell them at a profit—what Aristotle called “spurious wealth”—in a way that does not tangibly improve a community’s well-being and which has no satiation ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Meikle</Author><Year>1994</Year><RecNum>2758</RecNum><DisplayText>(Meikle, 1994)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2758</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456937295">2758</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Meikle, S.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Aristotle on money</title><secondary-title>Phronesis</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Phronesis</full-title></periodical><pages>26-44</pages><volume>39</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>1994</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Meikle, 1994). This is consistent with modern economists who realize that there are limits to growth on a finite planet ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Meadows</Author><Year>2004</Year><RecNum>2773</RecNum><Prefix>e.g.`, </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g., Meadows, Randers, &amp; Meadows, 2004)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2773</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1457107462">2773</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Meadows, Donella</author><author>Randers, Jorgen</author><author>Meadows, Dennis</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Limits to Growth: The 30-year update</title></titles><pages>338</pages><dates><year>2004</year></dates><pub-location>White River Junction, VT</pub-location><publisher>Chelsea Green Publishing Company</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g., Meadows, Randers, & Meadows, 2004).Finally, the third hallmark that distinguishes virtue theory from consequential utilitarianism is that virtue theory has a distinct focus on the overall well-being of the larger community. In a nutshell, the goal of virtue theory is to optimize eudemonia (a deep sense of human flourishing and happiness), which occurs only via enacting the virtues in community PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5HYXZpbjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDQ8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4yMTQzPC9SZWNOdW0+PERpc3BsYXlUZXh0PihGbHlubiwgMjAwODsgR2F2aW4gJmFtcDsg

TWFzb24sIDIwMDQ7IEtvZWhuLCAxOTk4OyBTaW5uaWNrcywgMjAxNCk8L0Rpc3BsYXlUZXh0Pjxy

ZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjE0MzwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBw

PSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0

YW1wPSIxMzExNDM1NTI3Ij4yMTQzPC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9

IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1

dGhvcj5HYXZpbiwgSm9hbm5lIEguPC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5NYXNvbiwgUmljaGFyZCBPLjwv

YXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5UaGUgdmlydHVv

dXMgb3JnYW5pemF0aW9uOiBUaGUgdmFsdWUgb2YgaGFwcGluZXNzIGluIHRoZSB3b3JrcGxhY2U8

L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+T3JnYW5pemF0aW9uYWwgRHluYW1pY3M8L3NlY29uZGFy

eS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5Pcmdhbml6YXRpb25hbCBE

eW5hbWljczwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3BlcmlvZGljYWw+PHBhZ2VzPjM3OS0zOTI8L3BhZ2VzPjx2

b2x1bWU+MzM8L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjQ8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwNDwveWVh

cj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48ZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+MTAuMTAxNi9q

Lm9yZ2R5bi4yMDA0LjA5LjAwNTwvZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9D

aXRlPjxDaXRlPjxBdXRob3I+Rmx5bm48L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDA4PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+

MjU3NTwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjU3NTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWln

bi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3

ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDI2ODY1MjQ0Ij4yNTc1PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+

PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRv

cnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5GbHlubiwgR2FicmllbDwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2Nv

bnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5UaGUgdmlydHVvdXMgbWFuYWdlcjogQSB2aXNpb24g

Zm9yIGxlYWRlcnNoaXAgaW4gYnVzaW5lc3M8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+Sm91cm5h

bCBvZiBCdXNpbmVzcyBFdGhpY3M8L3NlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNh

bD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5Kb3VybmFsIG9mIEJ1c2luZXNzIEV0aGljczwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3Bl

cmlvZGljYWw+PHBhZ2VzPjM1OS0zNzI8L3BhZ2VzPjx2b2x1bWU+Nzg8L3ZvbHVtZT48a2V5d29y

ZHM+PGtleXdvcmQ+ZXhlY3V0aXZlIGNvbXBlbnNhdGlvbiwgdmlydHVlIGV0aGljczwva2V5d29y

ZD48L2tleXdvcmRzPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4yMDA4PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxz

PjxlbGVjdHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT4xMC4xMDA3L3MxMDU1MS0wMDYtOTMzMS15PC9lbGVj

dHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Lb2Vobjwv

QXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5OTg8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yMDE0PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVj

LW51bWJlcj4yMDE0PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1p

ZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjEyODgw

MzMwMTkiPjIwMTQ8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBB

cnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPktvZWhu

LCBEYXJ5bDwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5W

aXJ0dWUgZXRoaWNzLCB0aGUgZmlybSwgYW5kIG1vcmFsIHBzeWNob2xvZ3k8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNv

bmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzIFF1YXJ0ZXJseTwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwv

dGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkJ1c2luZXNzIEV0aGljcyBRdWFydGVybHk8

L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz40OTctNTEzPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjg8

L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjM8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MTk5ODwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVz

Pjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48ZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+MTAuMjMwNy8zODU3NDM0PC9l

bGVjdHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5TaW5u

aWNrczwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMTQ8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yODMxPC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29y

ZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4yODMxPC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVO

IiBkYi1pZD0icnRyOXBkNXZkcmZhZHBlMjlwdXhyZXA4dHd3NXdwd3MwYTJhIj4yODMxPC9rZXk+

PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10

eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5TaW5uaWNrcywgTWF0dGhldzwvYXV0

aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5QcmFjdGljZXMsIEJv

dmVybmFuY2UsIGFuZCBQb2xpdGljczogQXBwbHlpbmcgTWFjSW50eXJlJmFwb3M7cyBFdGhpY3Mg

dG8gQnVzaW5lc3M8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzIFF1YXJ0

ZXJseTwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkJ1

c2luZXNzIEV0aGljcyBRdWFydGVybHk8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4y

MjktMjQ5PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjI0PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj4yPC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVz

Pjx5ZWFyPjIwMTQ8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3Vy

Y2UtbnVtPjEwLjU4NDAvYmVxMjAxNDUyOTk8L2VsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVj

b3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5HYXZpbjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDQ8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4yMTQzPC9SZWNOdW0+PERpc3BsYXlUZXh0PihGbHlubiwgMjAwODsgR2F2aW4gJmFtcDsg

TWFzb24sIDIwMDQ7IEtvZWhuLCAxOTk4OyBTaW5uaWNrcywgMjAxNCk8L0Rpc3BsYXlUZXh0Pjxy

ZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjE0MzwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBw

PSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0

YW1wPSIxMzExNDM1NTI3Ij4yMTQzPC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9

IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1

dGhvcj5HYXZpbiwgSm9hbm5lIEguPC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5NYXNvbiwgUmljaGFyZCBPLjwv

YXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5UaGUgdmlydHVv

dXMgb3JnYW5pemF0aW9uOiBUaGUgdmFsdWUgb2YgaGFwcGluZXNzIGluIHRoZSB3b3JrcGxhY2U8

L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+T3JnYW5pemF0aW9uYWwgRHluYW1pY3M8L3NlY29uZGFy

eS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5Pcmdhbml6YXRpb25hbCBE

eW5hbWljczwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3BlcmlvZGljYWw+PHBhZ2VzPjM3OS0zOTI8L3BhZ2VzPjx2

b2x1bWU+MzM8L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjQ8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwNDwveWVh

cj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48ZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+MTAuMTAxNi9q

Lm9yZ2R5bi4yMDA0LjA5LjAwNTwvZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9D

aXRlPjxDaXRlPjxBdXRob3I+Rmx5bm48L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4yMDA4PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+

MjU3NTwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjU3NTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWln

bi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3

ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDI2ODY1MjQ0Ij4yNTc1PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+

PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRv

cnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5GbHlubiwgR2FicmllbDwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2Nv

bnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5UaGUgdmlydHVvdXMgbWFuYWdlcjogQSB2aXNpb24g

Zm9yIGxlYWRlcnNoaXAgaW4gYnVzaW5lc3M8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+Sm91cm5h

bCBvZiBCdXNpbmVzcyBFdGhpY3M8L3NlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNh

bD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5Kb3VybmFsIG9mIEJ1c2luZXNzIEV0aGljczwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3Bl

cmlvZGljYWw+PHBhZ2VzPjM1OS0zNzI8L3BhZ2VzPjx2b2x1bWU+Nzg8L3ZvbHVtZT48a2V5d29y

ZHM+PGtleXdvcmQ+ZXhlY3V0aXZlIGNvbXBlbnNhdGlvbiwgdmlydHVlIGV0aGljczwva2V5d29y

ZD48L2tleXdvcmRzPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4yMDA4PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxz

PjxlbGVjdHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT4xMC4xMDA3L3MxMDU1MS0wMDYtOTMzMS15PC9lbGVj

dHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Lb2Vobjwv

QXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5OTg8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yMDE0PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVj

LW51bWJlcj4yMDE0PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1p

ZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjEyODgw

MzMwMTkiPjIwMTQ8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBB

cnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPktvZWhu

LCBEYXJ5bDwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5W

aXJ0dWUgZXRoaWNzLCB0aGUgZmlybSwgYW5kIG1vcmFsIHBzeWNob2xvZ3k8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNv

bmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzIFF1YXJ0ZXJseTwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwv

dGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkJ1c2luZXNzIEV0aGljcyBRdWFydGVybHk8

L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz40OTctNTEzPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjg8

L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjM8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MTk5ODwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVz

Pjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48ZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+MTAuMjMwNy8zODU3NDM0PC9l

bGVjdHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5TaW5u

aWNrczwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMTQ8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yODMxPC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29y

ZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4yODMxPC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVO

IiBkYi1pZD0icnRyOXBkNXZkcmZhZHBlMjlwdXhyZXA4dHd3NXdwd3MwYTJhIj4yODMxPC9rZXk+

PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10

eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5TaW5uaWNrcywgTWF0dGhldzwvYXV0

aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5QcmFjdGljZXMsIEJv

dmVybmFuY2UsIGFuZCBQb2xpdGljczogQXBwbHlpbmcgTWFjSW50eXJlJmFwb3M7cyBFdGhpY3Mg

dG8gQnVzaW5lc3M8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QnVzaW5lc3MgRXRoaWNzIFF1YXJ0

ZXJseTwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkJ1

c2luZXNzIEV0aGljcyBRdWFydGVybHk8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4y

MjktMjQ5PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjI0PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj4yPC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVz

Pjx5ZWFyPjIwMTQ8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3Vy

Y2UtbnVtPjEwLjU4NDAvYmVxMjAxNDUyOTk8L2VsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVj

b3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Flynn, 2008; Gavin & Mason, 2004; Koehn, 1998; Sinnicks, 2014). Thus, an ethical leader is someone who exhibits and promotes virtue in community and acts to maximize its collective well-being (eudemonia). In an economic context, firms are communities ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Solomon</Author><Year>1992</Year><RecNum>2013</RecNum><DisplayText>(Koehn, 1998; Solomon, 1992)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2013</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1287775299">2013</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Solomon, Robert C.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics</title><secondary-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</full-title></periodical><pages>317-339</pages><volume>2</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>1992</year></dates><urls></urls><electronic-resource-num>10.2307/3857536</electronic-resource-num></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Koehn</Author><Year>1998</Year><RecNum>2014</RecNum><record><rec-number>2014</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1288033019">2014</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Koehn, Daryl</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Virtue ethics, the firm, and moral psychology</title><secondary-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</full-title></periodical><pages>497-513</pages><volume>8</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>1998</year></dates><urls></urls><electronic-resource-num>10.2307/3857434</electronic-resource-num></record></Cite></EndNote>(Koehn, 1998; Solomon, 1992), and also belong to a larger community of organizations and the broader society. Virtue theory often emphasizes the “common good” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Arjoon</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>2021</RecNum><DisplayText>(Arjoon, 2000; Pirson, 2011)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2021</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1288283084">2021</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Arjoon, Surendra</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business</title><secondary-title>Journal of Business Ethics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Business Ethics</full-title></periodical><pages>159-178</pages><volume>28</volume><dates><year>2000</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Pirson</Author><Year>2011</Year><RecNum>2502</RecNum><record><rec-number>2502</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1406042144">2502</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book Section">5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Pirson, Michael</author></authors><secondary-authors><author>Amann, Wolfgang</author><author>Pirson, Michael</author><author>Dierksmeier, Claus</author><author>von Kimakowitz, Ernst</author><author>Spitzeck, Heiko</author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title>What is business organizing for? The role of business in society over time</title><secondary-title>Business Schools Under Fire: Humanistic management education as the way forward</secondary-title></titles><pages>41-51</pages><dates><year>2011</year></dates><pub-location>Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire</pub-location><publisher>Palgrave Macmillan</publisher><urls></urls><electronic-resource-num>10.1057/9780230353855.0007</electronic-resource-num></record></Cite></EndNote>(Arjoon, 2000; Pirson, 2011), which transcends both the interests of individuals per se, and their material or financial well-being. In sum, virtue theory has radical implications for the content and meaning of ethical leadership. From a mainstream consequential utilitarian perspective it is unethical for a leader to incur financial costs that exceed minimum legal requirements in order to reduce her firm’s negative social and/or ecological externalities if doing so compromises the financial outcomes for the firm ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Friedman</Author><Year>1970</Year><RecNum>583</RecNum><DisplayText>(Friedman, 1970)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>583</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">583</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Milton Friedman</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits</title><secondary-title>New York Times Magazine</secondary-title></titles><pages>122-126</pages><dates><year>1970</year><pub-dates><date>September 13, 1970</date></pub-dates></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Friedman, 1970). From a virtue perspective, it would be unethical for a leader not to reduce her firm’s negative social and/or ecological externalities so long as doing so does not compromise the firm’s viability. The radical nature of our approach is hard to understate. We are not using virtue theory to “tweak” existing mainstream theory about ethical leadership or strategy, for example, by arguing that ethical leaders should exhibit virtuous behavior while maximizing their firm’s (and their own) financial well-being. Rather, according to virtue theory, we are suggesting that maximizing financial well-being should not be the primary purpose of business. We are suggesting that nurturing community well-being should become the primary purpose, and that this involves ethical leadership character and practices that nurture organizational structures, systems, and strategies that facilitate eudemonia. In the next section, we examine the implications of ethical leadership through the lens of organizational strategy, contrasting and comparing differences between consequential utilitarianism and virtue theory. In particular, we review the mainstream consequential utilitarian approach to strategy, and then develop a parallel approach based on virtue theory.Virtue theory, ethical leadership, and strategyThe influence of organizational leaders is evident in many areas, but perhaps is the most pervasive in the development of firm strategy. Strategy involves the setting of organizational direction ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Andrews</Author><Year>1971</Year><RecNum>1936</RecNum><DisplayText>(Andrews, 1971)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1936</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1280244588">1936</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Andrews, Kenneth R.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Concept of Corporate Strategy</title></titles><dates><year>1971</year></dates><pub-location>Homewood, Ill</pub-location><publisher>Richard D. Irwin</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Andrews, 1971), which is inherently an ethical process ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Elms</Author><Year>2010</Year><RecNum>2059</RecNum><DisplayText>(Elms, Brammer, Harris, &amp; Phillips, 2010; Hosmer, 1994)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2059</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1290636753">2059</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Elms, Heather</author><author>Brammer, Stephen</author><author>Harris, Jared D.</author><author>Phillips, Robert A.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>New directions in strategic management and business ethics</title><secondary-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</full-title></periodical><pages>401-425</pages><volume>20</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2010</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Hosmer</Author><Year>1994</Year><RecNum>2057</RecNum><record><rec-number>2057</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1290546966">2057</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Hosmer, Larue Tone</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Strategic planning as if ethics mattered</title><secondary-title>Strategic Management Journal</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Strategic Management Journal</full-title></periodical><pages>17-34</pages><volume>15</volume><number>Summer 1994</number><keywords><keyword>Strategy, morals, ethics, trust, commitment</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1994</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Elms, Brammer, Harris, & Phillips, 2010; Hosmer, 1994). Scholars have argued that ethics and strategy have become divorced over time ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Hosmer</Author><Year>1994</Year><RecNum>2057</RecNum><DisplayText>(Hosmer, 1994)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2057</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1290546966">2057</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Hosmer, Larue Tone</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Strategic planning as if ethics mattered</title><secondary-title>Strategic Management Journal</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Strategic Management Journal</full-title></periodical><pages>17-34</pages><volume>15</volume><number>Summer 1994</number><keywords><keyword>Strategy, morals, ethics, trust, commitment</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1994</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Hosmer, 1994). We propose an alternate hypothesis – it is not that ethics have become divorced from strategy, but rather that the strategy literature so completely adopts the consequentialist-utilitarian moral framework that the two have become fused together. In this section, we demonstrate this by reviewing Porter’s generic strategy theory and then reinterpreting it through a virtue theory lens. Doing so provides the foundation for us to develop a set of generic strategies based on virtue theory paralleling Porter’s generic strategies. Our method of developing alternative theory parallel to mainstream theory is well-established and consistent with those who argue that using paradoxical and competing assumptions provides a helpful framework for developing new theory and a more holistic understanding of management PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5FbHNiYWNoPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MTk5OTwvWWVhcj48

UmVjTnVtPjE3ODY8L1JlY051bT48UHJlZml4PmUuZy5gLCA8L1ByZWZpeD48RGlzcGxheVRleHQ+

KGUuZy4sIEVsc2JhY2gsIFN1dHRvbiwgJmFtcDsgV2hldHRlbiwgMTk5OTsgTGV3aXMgJmFtcDsg

R3JpbWVzLCAxOTk5OyBQb29sZSAmYW1wOyBWYW4gZGUgVmVuLCAxOTg5KTwvRGlzcGxheVRleHQ+

PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4xNzg2PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBh

cHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1l

c3RhbXA9IjAiPjE3ODY8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5h

bCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkVs

c2JhY2gsIEsuRC48L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlN1dHRvbiwgUm9iZXJ0IEk8L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0

aG9yPldoZXR0ZW4sIERhdmlkIEEuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0

aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPlBlcnNwZWN0aXZlcyBvbiBkZXZlbG9waW5nIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgdGhlb3J5

LCBjaXJjYSAxOTk5OiBNb3ZpbmcgZnJvbSBzaHJpbGwgbW9ub2xvZ3VlcyB0byAocmVsYXRpdmVs

eSkgdGFtZSBkaWFsb2d1ZXM8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QWNhZGVteSBvZiBNYW5h

Z2VtZW50IFJldmlldzwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxs

LXRpdGxlPkFjYWRlbXkgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBSZXZpZXc8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2Rp

Y2FsPjxwYWdlcz42MjctNjMzPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjI0PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj40PC9u

dW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjE5OTk8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNv

cmQ+PC9DaXRlPjxDaXRlPjxBdXRob3I+TGV3aXM8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTk5PC9ZZWFyPjxS

ZWNOdW0+MTc4NzwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MTc4NzwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48

Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVy

ODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIwIj4xNzg3PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJl

Zi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+

PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5MZXdpcywgTS5XLjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+R3JpbWVzLCBBLkou

PC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPk1ldGF0cmlh

bmd1bGF0aW9uOiBCdWlsZGluZyB0aGVvcnkgZnJvbSBtdWx0aXBsZSBwYXJhZGlnbXM8L3RpdGxl

PjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QWNhZGVteSBvZiBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFJldmlldzwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5

LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkFjYWRlbXkgb2YgTWFuYWdl

bWVudCBSZXZpZXc8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz42NzItNjkwPC9wYWdl

cz48dm9sdW1lPjI0PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj40PC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjE5OTk8

L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjxDaXRlPjxBdXRob3I+

UG9vbGU8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTg5PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+NDc4PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29y

ZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj40Nzg8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4i

IGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0i

MCI+NDc4PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNs

ZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5Qb29sZSwgTWFy

c2hhbGwgU2NvdHQ8L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlZhbiBkZSBWZW4sIEFuZHJldyBILjwvYXV0aG9y

PjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5Vc2luZyBwYXJhZG94IHRv

IGJ1aWxkIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgYW5kIG9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbiB0aGVvcmllczwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29u

ZGFyeS10aXRsZT5UaGUgQWNhZGVteSBPZiBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFJldmlldzwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRp

dGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwYWdlcz41NjItNTc4PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjE0PC92b2x1bWU+PG51

bWJlcj40PC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjE5ODk8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3Vy

bHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjEwLjU0NjUvQU1SLjE5ODkuNDMwODM4OSA8L2Vs

ZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5FbHNiYWNoPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MTk5OTwvWWVhcj48

UmVjTnVtPjE3ODY8L1JlY051bT48UHJlZml4PmUuZy5gLCA8L1ByZWZpeD48RGlzcGxheVRleHQ+

KGUuZy4sIEVsc2JhY2gsIFN1dHRvbiwgJmFtcDsgV2hldHRlbiwgMTk5OTsgTGV3aXMgJmFtcDsg

R3JpbWVzLCAxOTk5OyBQb29sZSAmYW1wOyBWYW4gZGUgVmVuLCAxOTg5KTwvRGlzcGxheVRleHQ+

PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4xNzg2PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBh

cHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1l

c3RhbXA9IjAiPjE3ODY8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5h

bCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkVs

c2JhY2gsIEsuRC48L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlN1dHRvbiwgUm9iZXJ0IEk8L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0

aG9yPldoZXR0ZW4sIERhdmlkIEEuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0

aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPlBlcnNwZWN0aXZlcyBvbiBkZXZlbG9waW5nIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgdGhlb3J5

LCBjaXJjYSAxOTk5OiBNb3ZpbmcgZnJvbSBzaHJpbGwgbW9ub2xvZ3VlcyB0byAocmVsYXRpdmVs

eSkgdGFtZSBkaWFsb2d1ZXM8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QWNhZGVteSBvZiBNYW5h

Z2VtZW50IFJldmlldzwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxs

LXRpdGxlPkFjYWRlbXkgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBSZXZpZXc8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2Rp

Y2FsPjxwYWdlcz42MjctNjMzPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjI0PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj40PC9u

dW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjE5OTk8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNv

cmQ+PC9DaXRlPjxDaXRlPjxBdXRob3I+TGV3aXM8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTk5PC9ZZWFyPjxS

ZWNOdW0+MTc4NzwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MTc4NzwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48

Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVy

ODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIwIj4xNzg3PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJl

Zi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+

PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5MZXdpcywgTS5XLjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+R3JpbWVzLCBBLkou

PC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPk1ldGF0cmlh

bmd1bGF0aW9uOiBCdWlsZGluZyB0aGVvcnkgZnJvbSBtdWx0aXBsZSBwYXJhZGlnbXM8L3RpdGxl

PjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QWNhZGVteSBvZiBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFJldmlldzwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5

LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkFjYWRlbXkgb2YgTWFuYWdl

bWVudCBSZXZpZXc8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz42NzItNjkwPC9wYWdl

cz48dm9sdW1lPjI0PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj40PC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjE5OTk8

L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjxDaXRlPjxBdXRob3I+

UG9vbGU8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTg5PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+NDc4PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29y

ZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj40Nzg8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4i

IGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0i

MCI+NDc4PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNs

ZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5Qb29sZSwgTWFy

c2hhbGwgU2NvdHQ8L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlZhbiBkZSBWZW4sIEFuZHJldyBILjwvYXV0aG9y

PjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5Vc2luZyBwYXJhZG94IHRv

IGJ1aWxkIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgYW5kIG9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbiB0aGVvcmllczwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29u

ZGFyeS10aXRsZT5UaGUgQWNhZGVteSBPZiBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFJldmlldzwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRp

dGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwYWdlcz41NjItNTc4PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjE0PC92b2x1bWU+PG51

bWJlcj40PC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjE5ODk8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3Vy

bHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjEwLjU0NjUvQU1SLjE5ODkuNDMwODM4OSA8L2Vs

ZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (e.g., Elsbach, Sutton, & Whetten, 1999; Lewis & Grimes, 1999; Poole & Van de Ven, 1989). This parallelism-based approach leverages the strengths associated with long-honored theoretical frameworks and addresses some of their shortcomings. In our case, we develop parallels to Porter’s generic strategies. We begin by reviewing Porter’s theory. Generic Strategy 1.0 (based on consequential utilitarianism). Michael Porter’s work on generic strategies, along with his five forces and value chain frameworks, has been highly influential both among practitioners and scholars ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Stonehouse</Author><Year>2007</Year><RecNum>2045</RecNum><Suffix>: 257</Suffix><DisplayText>(Stonehouse &amp; Snowdon, 2007: 257)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2045</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1289583773">2045</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Stonehouse, G.</author><author>Snowdon, B.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Meet the person: Comparative advantage revisited: Michael Porter on strategy and competitiveness</title><secondary-title>Journal of Management Inquiry</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Management Inquiry</full-title></periodical><pages>256-273</pages><volume>16</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2007</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Stonehouse & Snowdon, 2007: 257). It has robust empirical support delineating a range of direct and moderating effects PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Lb3RoYTwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5OTU8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4yMDUxPC9SZWNOdW0+PFByZWZpeD5lLmcuYCwgPC9QcmVmaXg+PERpc3BsYXlUZXh0Pihl

LmcuLCBEZXNzICZhbXA7IERhdmlzLCAxOTg0OyBLb3RoYSAmYW1wOyBWYWRsYW1hbmksIDE5OTU7

IE1pbGxlciAmYW1wOyBEZXNzLCAxOTkzOyBXcmlnaHQsIDE5ODcpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVj

b3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNTE8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0i

RU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFt

cD0iMTI5MDE4MDYwOCI+MjA1MTwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJK

b3VybmFsIEFydGljbGUiPjE3PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRo

b3I+S290aGEsIFN1cmVzaDwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+VmFkbGFtYW5pLCBCaGF0dCBMLjwvYXV0

aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5Bc3Nlc3NpbmcgZ2Vu

ZXJpYyBzdHJhdGVnaWVzOiBBbiBlbXBpcmljYWwgaW52ZXN0aWdhdGlvbiBvZiB0d28gY29tcGV0

aW5nIHR5cG9sb2dpZXMgaW4gZGlzY3JldGUgbWFudWZhY3R1cmluZyBpbmR1c3RyaWVzPC90aXRs

ZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPlN0cmF0ZWdpYyBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IEpvdXJuYWw8L3NlY29uZGFy

eS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5TdHJhdGVnaWMgTWFuYWdl

bWVudCBKb3VybmFsPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+NzUtODM8L3BhZ2Vz

Pjx2b2x1bWU+MTY8L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjE8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MTk5NTwv

eWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5X

cmlnaHQ8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTg3PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MjA1MjwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNv

cmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjA1MjwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJF

TiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1w

PSIxMjkwMTgwNjc1Ij4yMDUyPC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9Ikpv

dXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhv

cj5XcmlnaHQsIFBldGVyPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+

PHRpdGxlPkEgcmVmaW5lbWVudCBvZiBQb3J0ZXImYXBvcztzIHN0cnRlZ2llczwvdGl0bGU+PHNl

Y29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5TdHJhdGVnaWMgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBKb3VybmFsPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0

bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+U3RyYXRlZ2ljIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQg

Sm91cm5hbDwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3BlcmlvZGljYWw+PHBhZ2VzPjkzLTEwMTwvcGFnZXM+PHZv

bHVtZT44PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj4xPC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjE5ODc8L3llYXI+

PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjxDaXRlPjxBdXRob3I+RGVzczwv

QXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5ODQ8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yMDUzPC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVj

LW51bWJlcj4yMDUzPC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1p

ZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjEyOTAx

ODEwMDIiPjIwNTM8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBB

cnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkRlc3Ms

IEdyZWdvcnkgRy48L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPkRhdmlzLCBwZXRlciBTLjwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0

aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5Qb3J0ZXImYXBvcztzICgxOTgwKSBn

ZW5lcmljIHN0cmF0ZWdpZXMgYXMgZGV0ZXJtaW5hbnRzIG9mIHN0cmF0ZWdpYyBncm91cCBtZW1i

ZXJzaGlwIGFuZCBvcmdhbml6YXRpb25hbCBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZTwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10

aXRsZT5BY2FkZW15IG9mIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgSm91cm5hbDwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0

bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkFjYWRlbXkgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBKb3VybmFs

PC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+NDY3LTQ4ODwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT4y

Nzwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+MzwvbnVtYmVyPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4xOTg0PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0

ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPk1pbGxlcjwvQXV0

aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5OTM8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yMDU0PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51

bWJlcj4yMDU0PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0i

MnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjEyOTAxODEw

NzEiPjIwNTQ8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRp

Y2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPk1pbGxlciwg

QS48L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPkRlc3MsIEdyZWdvcnkgRy48L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1dGhvcnM+PC9j

b250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxlcz48dGl0bGU+QXNzZXNzaW5nIFBvcnRlciZhcG9zO3MgKDE5ODAp

IG1vZGVsIGluIHRlcm1zIG9mIGdlbmVyYWxpemFiaWxpdHksIGFjY3VyYWN5LCBhbmQgc2ltcGxp

Y2l0eTwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5Kb3VybmFsIG9mIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgU3R1ZGll

czwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkpvdXJu

YWwgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBTdHVkaWVzPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+

NTUzLTU4NTwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT4zMDwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+NDwvbnVtYmVyPjxkYXRl

cz48eWVhcj4xOTkzPC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48

L0VuZE5vdGU+AG==

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5Lb3RoYTwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5OTU8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4yMDUxPC9SZWNOdW0+PFByZWZpeD5lLmcuYCwgPC9QcmVmaXg+PERpc3BsYXlUZXh0Pihl

LmcuLCBEZXNzICZhbXA7IERhdmlzLCAxOTg0OyBLb3RoYSAmYW1wOyBWYWRsYW1hbmksIDE5OTU7

IE1pbGxlciAmYW1wOyBEZXNzLCAxOTkzOyBXcmlnaHQsIDE5ODcpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVj

b3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNTE8L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0i

RU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFlYWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFt

cD0iMTI5MDE4MDYwOCI+MjA1MTwva2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJK

b3VybmFsIEFydGljbGUiPjE3PC9yZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRo

b3I+S290aGEsIFN1cmVzaDwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+VmFkbGFtYW5pLCBCaGF0dCBMLjwvYXV0

aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5Bc3Nlc3NpbmcgZ2Vu

ZXJpYyBzdHJhdGVnaWVzOiBBbiBlbXBpcmljYWwgaW52ZXN0aWdhdGlvbiBvZiB0d28gY29tcGV0

aW5nIHR5cG9sb2dpZXMgaW4gZGlzY3JldGUgbWFudWZhY3R1cmluZyBpbmR1c3RyaWVzPC90aXRs

ZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPlN0cmF0ZWdpYyBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IEpvdXJuYWw8L3NlY29uZGFy

eS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5TdHJhdGVnaWMgTWFuYWdl

bWVudCBKb3VybmFsPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+NzUtODM8L3BhZ2Vz

Pjx2b2x1bWU+MTY8L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjE8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MTk5NTwv

eWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5X

cmlnaHQ8L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTg3PC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MjA1MjwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNv

cmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MjA1MjwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJF

TiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1w

PSIxMjkwMTgwNjc1Ij4yMDUyPC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9Ikpv

dXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhv

cj5XcmlnaHQsIFBldGVyPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+

PHRpdGxlPkEgcmVmaW5lbWVudCBvZiBQb3J0ZXImYXBvcztzIHN0cnRlZ2llczwvdGl0bGU+PHNl

Y29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5TdHJhdGVnaWMgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBKb3VybmFsPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0

bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+U3RyYXRlZ2ljIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQg

Sm91cm5hbDwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3BlcmlvZGljYWw+PHBhZ2VzPjkzLTEwMTwvcGFnZXM+PHZv

bHVtZT44PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj4xPC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjE5ODc8L3llYXI+

PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjxDaXRlPjxBdXRob3I+RGVzczwv

QXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5ODQ8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yMDUzPC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVj

LW51bWJlcj4yMDUzPC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1p

ZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjEyOTAx

ODEwMDIiPjIwNTM8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBB

cnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkRlc3Ms

IEdyZWdvcnkgRy48L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPkRhdmlzLCBwZXRlciBTLjwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0

aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5Qb3J0ZXImYXBvcztzICgxOTgwKSBn

ZW5lcmljIHN0cmF0ZWdpZXMgYXMgZGV0ZXJtaW5hbnRzIG9mIHN0cmF0ZWdpYyBncm91cCBtZW1i

ZXJzaGlwIGFuZCBvcmdhbml6YXRpb25hbCBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZTwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10

aXRsZT5BY2FkZW15IG9mIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgSm91cm5hbDwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0

bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkFjYWRlbXkgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBKb3VybmFs

PC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+NDY3LTQ4ODwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT4y

Nzwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+MzwvbnVtYmVyPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4xOTg0PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0

ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPk1pbGxlcjwvQXV0

aG9yPjxZZWFyPjE5OTM8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4yMDU0PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51

bWJlcj4yMDU0PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0i

MnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjEyOTAxODEw

NzEiPjIwNTQ8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRp

Y2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPk1pbGxlciwg

QS48L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPkRlc3MsIEdyZWdvcnkgRy48L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1dGhvcnM+PC9j

b250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxlcz48dGl0bGU+QXNzZXNzaW5nIFBvcnRlciZhcG9zO3MgKDE5ODAp

IG1vZGVsIGluIHRlcm1zIG9mIGdlbmVyYWxpemFiaWxpdHksIGFjY3VyYWN5LCBhbmQgc2ltcGxp

Y2l0eTwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5Kb3VybmFsIG9mIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgU3R1ZGll

czwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkpvdXJu

YWwgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBTdHVkaWVzPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+

NTUzLTU4NTwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVtZT4zMDwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+NDwvbnVtYmVyPjxkYXRl

cz48eWVhcj4xOTkzPC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48

L0VuZE5vdGU+AG==

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (e.g., Dess & Davis, 1984; Kotha & Vadlamani, 1995; Miller & Dess, 1993; Wright, 1987). Our intention in describing Porter’s generic strategies is not to challenge existing theory and research, but instead to use it as a starting point to develop virtue-based generic strategies, which we call Generic Strategy 2.0. Because of their ubiquity, we focus on Porter’s (1980, 1985) early conceptions of generic strategies. We briefly review the ethical assumptions that underpin them, and highlight their value as “ideal-types” that provide a conceptual foundation for Generic Strategy 2.0. The consequentialist utilitarian assumptions underlying Porter’s generic strategies are quite evident. First, the strategies primarily focus on maximizing’s financial outcomes. For ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite AuthorYear="1"><Author>Porter</Author><Year>1991</Year><RecNum>2046</RecNum><Suffix>: 95</Suffix><DisplayText>Porter (1991: 95)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2046</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1289584330">2046</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Porter, Michael E.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Toward a dynamic theory of strategy</title><secondary-title>Strategic Management Journal</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Strategic Management Journal</full-title></periodical><pages>95-117</pages><volume>12</volume><dates><year>1991</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>Porter (1991: 95) the key question in strategy is “why [do] firms succeed or fail” (outcomes, consequences)? Firms succeed when they attain a competitive position that produces “superior and sustainable financial performance” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Porter</Author><Year>1991</Year><RecNum>2046</RecNum><Suffix>: 96</Suffix><DisplayText>(Porter, 1991: 96; Stonehouse &amp; Snowdon, 2007: 268)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2046</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1289584330">2046</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Porter, Michael E.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Toward a dynamic theory of strategy</title><secondary-title>Strategic Management Journal</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Strategic Management Journal</full-title></periodical><pages>95-117</pages><volume>12</volume><dates><year>1991</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Stonehouse</Author><Year>2007</Year><RecNum>2045</RecNum><Suffix>: 268</Suffix><record><rec-number>2045</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1289583773">2045</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Stonehouse, G.</author><author>Snowdon, B.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Meet the person: Comparative advantage revisited: Michael Porter on strategy and competitiveness</title><secondary-title>Journal of Management Inquiry</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Management Inquiry</full-title></periodical><pages>256-273</pages><volume>16</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2007</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Porter, 1991: 96; Stonehouse & Snowdon, 2007: 268). Superior profitability is both “the right goal, and for firms, the only goal” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Stonehouse</Author><Year>2007</Year><RecNum>2045</RecNum><Suffix>: 267</Suffix><DisplayText>(Stonehouse &amp; Snowdon, 2007: 267)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2045</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1289583773">2045</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Stonehouse, G.</author><author>Snowdon, B.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Meet the person: Comparative advantage revisited: Michael Porter on strategy and competitiveness</title><secondary-title>Journal of Management Inquiry</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Management Inquiry</full-title></periodical><pages>256-273</pages><volume>16</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2007</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Stonehouse & Snowdon, 2007: 267). Thus, Porter’s generic strategy framework reflects consequentialist utilitarian assumptions: generic strategies enable firms to generate competitive advantage (outcomes) characterized by superior financial profitability (a materialistic conception of performance) at the firm-level of analysis ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Porter</Author><Year>1991</Year><RecNum>2046</RecNum><DisplayText>(Porter, 1991; Stonehouse &amp; Snowdon, 2007)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2046</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1289584330">2046</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Porter, Michael E.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Toward a dynamic theory of strategy</title><secondary-title>Strategic Management Journal</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Strategic Management Journal</full-title></periodical><pages>95-117</pages><volume>12</volume><dates><year>1991</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Stonehouse</Author><Year>2007</Year><RecNum>2045</RecNum><record><rec-number>2045</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1289583773">2045</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Stonehouse, G.</author><author>Snowdon, B.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Meet the person: Comparative advantage revisited: Michael Porter on strategy and competitiveness</title><secondary-title>Journal of Management Inquiry</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Management Inquiry</full-title></periodical><pages>256-273</pages><volume>16</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2007</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Porter, 1991; Stonehouse & Snowdon, 2007). In cost leadership, firms strive to have a lower financial cost structure than rivals, leading to increased profits and/or enhanced market share (via lower prices). Differentiation occurs when a firm offers goods and services with unique features that command a premium price in excess of the extra cost of providing those features. These two strategies occur in the context of competitive scope (broad versus narrow). A major criticism of the consequential utilitarian paradigm generally, and of Generic Strategies 1.0 particularly, is that while the theory and practice (formal rationality) associated with this paradigm (substantive rationality) contribute to unprecedented firm-level financial outcomes (which is ethical and good within this paradigm), they have done so at great social and ecological costs. The paradigm’s focus on maximizing competitiveness and financial performance diminishes people’s well-being and happiness ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Kasser</Author><Year>2003</Year><RecNum>1780</RecNum><DisplayText>(Kasser, 2003)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1780</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1780</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Kasser, T.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The High Price of Materialism</title></titles><dates><year>2003</year></dates><pub-location>Cambridge, MA</pub-location><publisher>Bradford Books, MIT Press</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Kasser, 2003), encourages corporate scandals ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Giacolone</Author><Year>2006</Year><RecNum>1782</RecNum><DisplayText>(Giacolone &amp; Thompson, 2006)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1782</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1782</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Giacolone, Robert A.</author><author>Thompson, K.R.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview</title><secondary-title>Academy of Management Learning &amp; Education</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Academy of Management Learning &amp; Education</full-title></periodical><pages>266-277</pages><volume>5</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2006</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Giacolone & Thompson, 2006), and harms the ecology ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>McCarty</Author><Year>2001</Year><RecNum>1783</RecNum><DisplayText>(McCarty &amp; Shrum, 2001)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1783</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1783</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>McCarty, J.A.</author><author>Shrum, L.J.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior</title><secondary-title>Journal of Public Policy and Marketing</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Public Policy and Marketing</full-title></periodical><pages>93-104</pages><volume>20</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>2001</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(McCarty & Shrum, 2001). Hence, there is little wonder that scholars have called for and begun to develop alternative leadership and management theories PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5HaG9zaGFsPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwNTwvWWVhcj48

UmVjTnVtPjEzOTQ8L1JlY051bT48RGlzcGxheVRleHQ+KEdob3NoYWwsIDIwMDU7IE1pbnR6YmVy

ZywgU2ltb25zLCAmYW1wOyBCYXN1LCAyMDAyOyBTdGFobCAmYW1wOyBEZSBMdXF1ZSwgMjAxNCk8

L0Rpc3BsYXlUZXh0PjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MTM5NDwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWln

bi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3

ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIwIj4xMzk0PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBl

IG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhv

cnM+PGF1dGhvcj5HaG9zaGFsLCBTdW1hbnRyYTwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1

dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5CYWQgbWFuYWdlbWVudCB0aGVvcmllcyBhcmUgZGVzdHJveWlu

ZyBnb29kIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgcHJhY3RpY2VzPC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPkFjYWRl

bXkgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBMZWFybmluZyAmYW1wOyBFZHVjYXRpb248L3NlY29uZGFyeS10aXRs

ZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5BY2FkZW15IG9mIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQg

TGVhcm5pbmcgJmFtcDsgRWR1Y2F0aW9uPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+

NzUtOTE8L3BhZ2VzPjx2b2x1bWU+NDwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+MTwvbnVtYmVyPjxkYXRlcz48

eWVhcj4yMDA1PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0

ZT48QXV0aG9yPk1pbnR6YmVyZzwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDI8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4xNzc5

PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4xNzc5PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtl

eXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2

cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjAiPjE3Nzk8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFt

ZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48

YXV0aG9yPk1pbnR6YmVyZywgSGVucnk8L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlNpbW9ucywgUi48L2F1dGhv

cj48YXV0aG9yPkJhc3UsIEsuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRs

ZXM+PHRpdGxlPkJleW9uZCBzZWxmaXNobmVzczwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5TbG9h

biBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFJldmlldzwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2Fs

PjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPlNsb2FuIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgUmV2aWV3PC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9k

aWNhbD48cGFnZXM+NjctNzQ8L3BhZ2VzPjx2b2x1bWU+NDQ8L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjE8L251

bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwMjwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29y

ZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5TdGFobDwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMTQ8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4yNjgxPC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4yNjgxPC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxm

b3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4

MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjE0MzgzNjQ2ODciPjI2ODE8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24t

a2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRy

aWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPlN0YWhsLCBHdW50ZXIgSy48L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9y

PkRlIEx1cXVlLCBNYXJ5IFN1bGx5PC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0

aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkFudGVjZWRlbnRzIG9mIHJlc3BvbnNpYmxlIGxlYWRlciBiZWhhdmlvcjog

QSByZXNlYXJjaCBzeW50aGVzaXMsIGNvbmNlcHR1YWwgZnJhbWV3b3JrLCBhbmQgYWdlbmRhIGZv

ciBmdXR1cmUgcmVzZWFyY2g8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QWNhZGVteSBvZiBNYW5h

Z2VtZW50IFBlcnNwZWN0aXZlczwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2Fs

PjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkFjYWRlbXkgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBQZXJzcGVjdGl2ZXM8L2Z1bGwtdGl0

bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4yMzUtMjU0PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjI4PC92b2x1bWU+

PG51bWJlcj4zPC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIwMTQ8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48

L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjwvRW5kTm90ZT4A

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5HaG9zaGFsPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwNTwvWWVhcj48

UmVjTnVtPjEzOTQ8L1JlY051bT48RGlzcGxheVRleHQ+KEdob3NoYWwsIDIwMDU7IE1pbnR6YmVy

ZywgU2ltb25zLCAmYW1wOyBCYXN1LCAyMDAyOyBTdGFobCAmYW1wOyBEZSBMdXF1ZSwgMjAxNCk8

L0Rpc3BsYXlUZXh0PjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJlYy1udW1iZXI+MTM5NDwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWln

bi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3

ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIwIj4xMzk0PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBl

IG5hbWU9IkpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZSI+MTc8L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhv

cnM+PGF1dGhvcj5HaG9zaGFsLCBTdW1hbnRyYTwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1

dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5CYWQgbWFuYWdlbWVudCB0aGVvcmllcyBhcmUgZGVzdHJveWlu

ZyBnb29kIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgcHJhY3RpY2VzPC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPkFjYWRl

bXkgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBMZWFybmluZyAmYW1wOyBFZHVjYXRpb248L3NlY29uZGFyeS10aXRs

ZT48L3RpdGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5BY2FkZW15IG9mIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQg

TGVhcm5pbmcgJmFtcDsgRWR1Y2F0aW9uPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+

NzUtOTE8L3BhZ2VzPjx2b2x1bWU+NDwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+MTwvbnVtYmVyPjxkYXRlcz48

eWVhcj4yMDA1PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHVybHM+PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0

ZT48QXV0aG9yPk1pbnR6YmVyZzwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDI8L1llYXI+PFJlY051bT4xNzc5

PC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4xNzc5PC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxmb3JlaWduLWtl

eXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4MmZyZHdkdGR2

cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjAiPjE3Nzk8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFt

ZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48

YXV0aG9yPk1pbnR6YmVyZywgSGVucnk8L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9yPlNpbW9ucywgUi48L2F1dGhv

cj48YXV0aG9yPkJhc3UsIEsuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRs

ZXM+PHRpdGxlPkJleW9uZCBzZWxmaXNobmVzczwvdGl0bGU+PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5TbG9h

biBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFJldmlldzwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2Fs

PjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPlNsb2FuIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgUmV2aWV3PC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9k

aWNhbD48cGFnZXM+NjctNzQ8L3BhZ2VzPjx2b2x1bWU+NDQ8L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjE8L251

bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwMjwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29y

ZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5TdGFobDwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMTQ8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4yNjgxPC9SZWNOdW0+PHJlY29yZD48cmVjLW51bWJlcj4yNjgxPC9yZWMtbnVtYmVyPjxm

b3JlaWduLWtleXM+PGtleSBhcHA9IkVOIiBkYi1pZD0iMnpzMGV0dDAxZWFldjhlZjI5bnhwZXI4

MmZyZHdkdGR2cGVhIiB0aW1lc3RhbXA9IjE0MzgzNjQ2ODciPjI2ODE8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24t

a2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRy

aWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPlN0YWhsLCBHdW50ZXIgSy48L2F1dGhvcj48YXV0aG9y

PkRlIEx1cXVlLCBNYXJ5IFN1bGx5PC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0

aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkFudGVjZWRlbnRzIG9mIHJlc3BvbnNpYmxlIGxlYWRlciBiZWhhdmlvcjog

QSByZXNlYXJjaCBzeW50aGVzaXMsIGNvbmNlcHR1YWwgZnJhbWV3b3JrLCBhbmQgYWdlbmRhIGZv

ciBmdXR1cmUgcmVzZWFyY2g8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+QWNhZGVteSBvZiBNYW5h

Z2VtZW50IFBlcnNwZWN0aXZlczwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2Fs

PjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkFjYWRlbXkgb2YgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBQZXJzcGVjdGl2ZXM8L2Z1bGwtdGl0

bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4yMzUtMjU0PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjI4PC92b2x1bWU+

PG51bWJlcj4zPC9udW1iZXI+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIwMTQ8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48dXJscz48

L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjwvRW5kTm90ZT4A

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Ghoshal, 2005; Mintzberg, Simons, & Basu, 2002; Stahl & De Luque, 2014), particularly those not based on materialist-individualist assumptions ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Ferraro</Author><Year>2005</Year><RecNum>1773</RecNum><Prefix>e.g.`, </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g., Ferraro, Pfeffer, &amp; Sutton, 2005; Giacolone &amp; Thompson, 2006)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1773</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1773</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Ferraro, Fabrizio</author><author>Pfeffer, Jeffrey</author><author>Sutton, Robert I</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling</title><secondary-title>Academy of Management Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Academy of Management Review</full-title></periodical><pages>8-24</pages><volume>30</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>2005</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Giacolone</Author><Year>2006</Year><RecNum>1782</RecNum><record><rec-number>1782</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1782</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Giacolone, Robert A.</author><author>Thompson, K.R.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview</title><secondary-title>Academy of Management Learning &amp; Education</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Academy of Management Learning &amp; Education</full-title></periodical><pages>266-277</pages><volume>5</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2006</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g., Ferraro, Pfeffer, & Sutton, 2005; Giacolone & Thompson, 2006). As ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite AuthorYear="1"><Author>Hamel</Author><Year>2009</Year><RecNum>1862</RecNum><DisplayText>Hamel (2009)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1862</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1862</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Hamel, Gary</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Moon shots for management</title><secondary-title>Harvard Business Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Harvard Business Review</full-title></periodical><pages>91-98</pages><dates><year>2009</year><pub-dates><date>February 2009</date></pub-dates></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>Hamel (2009) succinctly states, it is time to replace Management 1.0 with Management 2.0. In light of these concerns, our presentation of Generic Strategies 2.0 highlights their relative strengths in addressing socio-ecological issues. In other words, rather than focus on how ethical leadership seeks to increase the financial welfare of the firm (consequential utilitarianism), we focus on how ethical leadership improves the socio-ecological well-being of community (virtue theory). Generic Strategy 2.0 (based on virtue theory). The Generic Strategies 2.0 we describe here—minimizer, transformer, and compounder—are grounded in virtue theory, and in important ways parallel the ideal types in Porter’s framework. Similar to Porter’s original model, in our model the minimizer and transformer strategies draw upon distinct logics, but founded in virtue theory. Minimizers reduce multiple costs (e.g., social, financial, ecological), including negative externalities. Transformers enhance multiple forms of well-being (e.g., financial, social, ecological), creating positive externalities by redeeming (infusing value into) elements of the environment that were previously undervalued or wasted. Minimizer and transformer strategies emphasize improved socio-ecological well-being (versus having a primary or exclusive focus on financial well-being) for the larger community (recognizing multiple stakeholders; going beyond a primary focus on financial implications at the firm level). This dual emphasis on reducing negative characteristics (minimizer), and enhancing positive characteristics (transformer), reflects ethical leadership ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Neubert</Author><Year>2013</Year><RecNum>2767</RecNum><DisplayText>(Neubert, Wu, &amp; Roberts, 2013)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2767</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456947494">2767</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Neubert, Mitch</author><author>Wu, J-C.</author><author>Roberts, J.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The influence of ethical leadership and regulatory focus on employee outcomes</title><secondary-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</full-title></periodical><pages>269-296</pages><volume>23</volume><number>2</number><dates><year>2013</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Neubert, Wu, & Roberts, 2013).Because the business world has so completely adopted the consequentialist-utilitarian worldview, it is hard to look at the business world through “fresh eyes.” However, we now try to do so by looking at extant firms that most closely resemble the virtue theory worldview, although we admit that it is sort of like “putting new wine in old skins.”Examples of minimizer strategy. Costco exemplifies a firm moving towards a minimizer strategy, though still with a concern for profits. Costco’s co-founder James Sinegal recognizes the social costs associated with paying low wages, and Costco has internalized these costs by paying its employees relatively high wages and benefits. Sinegal asserts that doing so “is the right thing” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Holmes</Author><Year>2004</Year><RecNum>2074</RecNum><Suffix>: 77</Suffix><DisplayText>(Holmes &amp; Zellner, 2004: 77)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2074</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1294251859">2074</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Web Page">12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Holmes, S.</author><author>Zellner, W.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Costco way</title></titles><volume>2004</volume><number>April 12, 2004</number><dates><year>2004</year></dates><publisher>Business Week on line</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Holmes & Zellner, 2004: 77); for him this is ethical leadership. Costco also reduces ecological costs, both internally (e.g., using solar energy and reducing packaging materials) and by engaging with suppliers who decrease their ecological footprints. While many of these changes save Costco money, Sinegal is also open to changes where the pay-off is not immediate or guaranteed: “Wall Street is in the business of making money between now and next Tuesday. We’re in the business of building an organization, an institution that we hope will be here 50 years from now” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Nadkarni</Author><Year>2015</Year><RecNum>2769</RecNum><Prefix>quoted in </Prefix><DisplayText>(quoted in Nadkarni, Chen, &amp; Chen, 2015)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2769</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456948833">2769</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Nadkarni, Sucheta</author><author>Chen, T.</author><author>Chen, J.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The clock is ticking! Executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness</title><secondary-title>Strategic Management Journal</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Strategic Management Journal</full-title></periodical><dates><year>2015</year></dates><urls></urls><electronic-resource-num>10.1002/smj.2376</electronic-resource-num></record></Cite></EndNote>(quoted in Nadkarni, Chen, & Chen, 2015).Another example is AKI Energy, whose leaders draw upon traditional First Nations philosophies and values more akin to virtue theory. AKI Energy provides geothermal heating for First Nations communities in Canada, and thereby reduces the fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emission associated with heating homes, minimizes customers’ heating and air conditioning expenses, reduces the money leaving communities, and reduces unemployment rates in Indigenous communities ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Wood</Author><Year>2015</Year><RecNum>2778</RecNum><DisplayText>(Wood, Loney, &amp; Taylor, 2015)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2778</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1458141496">2778</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Wood, D.J.</author><author>Loney, L.</author><author>Taylor, K.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Social enterprise and the solutions economy: A toolkit for Manitoba First Nations</title></titles><dates><year>2015</year></dates><pub-location>Winnipeg, MB</pub-location><publisher>AKI Energy</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Wood, Loney, & Taylor, 2015). Minimizer strategies may also be evident when groups of organizations form communities to reduce their overall costs. For example, a biomass energy plant was developed in Gussing, Austria as a collaboration among multiple organizations to serve the needs of local homeowners and private industry; it reduced both energy costs to the community and greenhouse gas emissions, and reduced unemployment ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Turiera</Author><Year>2013</Year><RecNum>2705</RecNum><DisplayText>(Turiera &amp; Cros, 2013)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2705</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1442515089">2705</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Manuscript">36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Turiera, Teresa</author><author>Cros, Susanna</author></authors><secondary-authors><author>infomania</author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title>Co-business: 50 examples of business collaboration</title></titles><dates><year>2013</year></dates><pub-location>Barcelona, Spain</pub-location><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Turiera & Cros, 2013). Examples of a transformer strategy. Greyston Bakery in Yonkers, New York hires ex-convicts, trains them as bakers, and thereby enables them to “start over again” and become contributing members of society in a way that lowers recidivism ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Bertrand</Author><Year>2015</Year><RecNum>2739</RecNum><DisplayText>(Bertrand, 2015)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2739</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1445365346">2739</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Magazine Article">19</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Bertrand, Natasha</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The inspiring story behind the brownies in Ben &amp; Jerry&apos;s most popular flavors</title><secondary-title>Business Insider</secondary-title></titles><dates><year>2015</year><pub-dates><date>February 10</date></pub-dates></dates><urls><related-urls><url>ben-and-jerrys-greyston-bakery-workers-2015-2</url></related-urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Bertrand, 2015). Its strategy is a reflection of what its founder, Bernie Glassman, considers to be ethical leadership: “The company’s business approach is based on an idea developed from two key Buddhist concepts: mandala (wholeness) and path (transformation). According to these concepts, the company is managed in the belief that everything is interconnected, and that one cannot afford to ignore sections of society. Based on Zen traditions, Greyston places great emphasis on personal empowerment and transformation. Employees are encouraged to develop a sense of responsibility for themselves, their families, and their co-workers. Gainful employment is seen as the first step on an individual’s path toward success. Social justice, economic development and personal empowerment are the most important building blocks that support the operations that drive the company” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Zsolnai</Author><Year>2015</Year><RecNum>2763</RecNum><Suffix>: 75</Suffix><DisplayText>(Zsolnai, 2015: 75)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2763</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456944497">2763</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book Section">5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Zsolnai, L.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Post-materialistic business models</title><secondary-title>Post-Materialistic Business: Spiritual value-orientation in renewing management</secondary-title></titles><pages>46-77</pages><section>3</section><dates><year>2015</year></dates><pub-location>Houndsmills, UK</pub-location><publisher>Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Zsolnai, 2015: 75).Terracycle, Inc. has some attributes of an ecological transformer strategy. Founder Tom Szaky realized that it is profitable to take waste from institutional kitchens, transform it through a natural process of feeding it to worms, package the worms’ excrement into used soda pop bottles, and sell the output as fertilizer ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Szaky</Author><Year>2013</Year><RecNum>2724</RecNum><DisplayText>(Szaky, 2013)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2724</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1445029975">2724</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Szaky, T.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Revolution in a Bottle: How TerraCycle is redefining green business</title></titles><dates><year>2013</year></dates><publisher>Penguin</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Szaky, 2013). Terracycle now transforms or “upcycles” all sorts of consumer waste into marketable products ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Allen</Author><Year>2011</Year><RecNum>2715</RecNum><DisplayText>(Allen &amp; Knight, 2011)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2715</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1445026603">2715</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Web Page">12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Allen, N.</author><author>Knight, M.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Recycling the world&apos;s trash into cash</title></titles><volume>2015</volume><dates><year>2011</year></dates><publisher>Cable News Network</publisher><urls><related-urls><url>2011/10/10/world/americas/terracycle-recycling-waste-szaky/index.html</url></related-urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Allen & Knight, 2011). It works alongside schools (who get paid to collect waste and send it to Terracycle) and other corporations (who seek to transform their waste into sale-able products).Example of a compounder strategy. The compounder strategy is a combination of minimizer and transformer. It represents a departure from Porter’s original model, which considered low cost and differentiation strategies to be distinct and mutually exclusive drivers. Thus, Porter thought it very difficult for firms to pursue both simultaneously. Subsequent empirical evidence suggests that firms may successfully execute “mixed” strategies that encompass both cost leader and differentiation ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Miller</Author><Year>1993</Year><RecNum>2054</RecNum><DisplayText>(Kotha &amp; Vadlamani, 1995; Miller &amp; Dess, 1993)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2054</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1290181071">2054</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Miller, A.</author><author>Dess, Gregory G.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Assessing Porter&apos;s (1980) model in terms of generalizability, accuracy, and simplicity</title><secondary-title>Journal of Management Studies</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Management Studies</full-title></periodical><pages>553-585</pages><volume>30</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>1993</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Kotha</Author><Year>1995</Year><RecNum>2051</RecNum><record><rec-number>2051</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1290180608">2051</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Kotha, Suresh</author><author>Vadlamani, Bhatt L.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Assessing generic strategies: An empirical investigation of two competing typologies in discrete manufacturing industries</title><secondary-title>Strategic Management Journal</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Strategic Management Journal</full-title></periodical><pages>75-83</pages><volume>16</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>1995</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Kotha & Vadlamani, 1995; Miller & Dess, 1993). The same argument that supports the viability of mixed conventional generic strategy ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dess</Author><Year>1984</Year><RecNum>2053</RecNum><Prefix>e.g.`, </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g., Dess &amp; Davis, 1984; Rothaermel, 2015)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2053</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1290181002">2053</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dess, Gregory G.</author><author>Davis, peter S.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Porter&apos;s (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance</title><secondary-title>Academy of Management Journal</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Academy of Management Journal</full-title></periodical><pages>467-488</pages><volume>27</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>1984</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Rothaermel</Author><Year>2015</Year><RecNum>2666</RecNum><record><rec-number>2666</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1435256777">2666</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Rothaermel, Frank T.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Strategic Management</title></titles><pages>467</pages><edition>2</edition><dates><year>2015</year></dates><pub-location>New York, NY</pub-location><publisher>McGraw Hill Education</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g., Dess & Davis, 1984; Rothaermel, 2015) is extended here. We argue that firms may be able to simultaneously pursue both minimizer and transformer strategies in what we call a compounder strategy. That is, although the two strategies rely on different logics, some organizations may be able to execute both simultaneously. Firms may find ways to minimize their holistic cost structure and transform waste into valuable products and services. Such a compounder strategy is evident in the ethical leadership approach of First Fruits apple orchard, the largest privately owned contiguous apple orchard in the United States. Consistent with a social transformer strategy, the First Fruits enhances the quality of life its workforce, which includes large numbers of formerly migrant workers. Rather than managing the workforce to maximize firm financial profitability by hiring and laying off (discarding, wasting) workers on an as-needed basis (as commonly occurs in their industry), First Fruits’ owners deliberately enlarged the firm to develop year-round jobs for many employees. This emphasis on year-round permanent jobs subsequently prompted the owners to open a day-care center to address the child-care needs of their packing plant employees, 80 percent of whom are women. In addition, a social minimizer strategy is evident because the firm minimizes nightshifts (especially stressful for employees with children). When the owners became aware of the housing shortage and poor living conditions employees were experiencing, they worked collaboratively with their region’s local planning committee to develop nearby affordable housing ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Bairstow</Author><Year>2005</Year><RecNum>2712</RecNum><DisplayText>(Bairstow, 2005; Roberge, 2003; Sparks, 2003)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2712</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1442942246">2712</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Personal Communication">26</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Bairstow, Roger</author></authors><secondary-authors><author>Bruno Dyck</author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title>Site visit and discussions</title></titles><dates><year>2005</year><pub-dates><date>July 21</date></pub-dates></dates><work-type>Site visit</work-type><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Sparks</Author><Year>2003</Year><RecNum>2089</RecNum><record><rec-number>2089</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1294623162">2089</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Sparks, Brian</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Apple grower of the year: Ralph Broetje</title><secondary-title>American Fruit Grower</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>American Fruit Grower</full-title></periodical><number>August 2003</number><dates><year>2003</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Roberge</Author><Year>2003</Year><RecNum>2090</RecNum><record><rec-number>2090</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1294623270">2090</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Magazine Article">19</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Roberge, Earl</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>First fruits - Broetje Orchards</title><secondary-title>Washington Business Magazine</secondary-title></titles><number>Summer</number><dates><year>2003</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Bairstow, 2005; Roberge, 2003; Sparks, 2003). In addition, First Fruits emphasizes elements of an ecological transformer strategy, emphasizing soil-rejuvenating organic practices ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Pihl</Author><Year>2012</Year><RecNum>2740</RecNum><DisplayText>(Pihl, 2012)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2740</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1445365797">2740</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Newspaper Article">23</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Pihl, Kristi</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Acreage down, sales of organic crops up in Washington</title><secondary-title>Tri-City Herald</secondary-title></titles><dates><year>2012</year></dates><urls><related-urls><url>news/local/article32061999.html</url></related-urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Pihl, 2012) and non-GMO apples ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Warner</Author><Year>2014</Year><RecNum>2741</RecNum><DisplayText>(Warner, 2014)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2741</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1445365934">2741</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Magazine Article">19</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Warner, Geraldine</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Opal apple verified non-GMO</title><secondary-title>GoodFruit Grower</secondary-title></titles><dates><year>2014</year><pub-dates><date>April 2, 2014</date></pub-dates></dates><urls><related-urls><url>opal-apple-verified-non-gmo/</url></related-urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Warner, 2014), and its ecological minimizer strategy is evident in reductions of its use of pesticides. The comments from the owners of First Fruits provide a clear indication that their understanding of ethical leadership is well-aligned with virtue theory:“When we started our business, we had nothing but a dream and the commitment to work it out. It was with the help of others who gave us every opportunity to learn, to participate, that we learned to fly. We needed an empowering team around us. When we finally became financially successful, it would have been easy to continue stockpiling money (as opposed to true wealth) around us. However, the spiritual values that we are also committed to would not let us. For us, it was impossible to separate business goals from spiritual values which promote the equality and connectedness of all people, using their unique gifts and skills to serve one another while together serving the common good.”“Sure, we have to make money or we’d have to shut the doors … But profit isn’t our main motive. It becomes the by-product of treating people with dignity, respect, and mutuality, and as equals in every sense of the word. We all have a role to play in creating a community of people who care for a business that then cares for them. We believe that if we ever stopped doing that, we would implode” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Neubert</Author><Year>2014</Year><RecNum>2770</RecNum><Prefix>cited in</Prefix><Suffix>: 65</Suffix><DisplayText>(cited inNeubert &amp; Dyck, 2014: 65)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2770</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456950668">2770</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Neubert, Mitch</author><author>Dyck, Bruno</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Organizational Behavior</title></titles><dates><year>2014</year></dates><pub-location>New York, NY</pub-location><publisher>John Wiley &amp; Sons</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(cited inNeubert & Dyck, 2014: 65).Finally, it is also possible that firms may come together in community to adopt a region-level compounder strategy. Doing so may allow the firms to access holistic cost reductions and transformations of waste that are unavailable to any of them individually ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Asheim</Author><Year>2006</Year><RecNum>2411</RecNum><DisplayText>(Asheim, Cooke, &amp; Martin, 2006)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2411</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1375370015">2411</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book Section">5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Asheim, Bjorn</author><author>Cooke, Philip</author><author>Martin, Ron</author></authors><secondary-authors><author>Asheim, Bjorn</author><author>Cooke, Philip</author><author>Martin, Ron</author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title>The rise of the cluster concept in regional analysis and policy</title><secondary-title>Clusters and Regional Development: Critical reflections and explorations</secondary-title></titles><pages>1-29</pages><section>1</section><keywords><keyword>clusters, literature review</keyword></keywords><dates><year>2006</year></dates><pub-location>London, UK</pub-location><publisher>Routledge</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Asheim, Cooke, & Martin, 2006). One notable example of such an industrial ecological community is Kalundborg, Denmark, where multiple organizations take each other’s “waste” and turn it into valuable inputs (Valero, Usón & Costa, 2012), significantly reducing waste products and converting them into viable uses PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5HaWJiczwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDc8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4yMDc3PC9SZWNOdW0+PFByZWZpeD5jLmYuYCwgPC9QcmVmaXg+PERpc3BsYXlUZXh0Pihj

LmYuLCBHaWJicyAmYW1wOyBEZXV0eiwgMjAwNzsgSGF3a2VuLCAxOTkzOyBUdWRvciwgQWRhbSwg

JmFtcDsgQmF0ZXMsIDIwMDYpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNzc8

L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFl

YWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTI5NDI1MjMyOSI+MjA3Nzwv

a2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJKb3VybmFsIEFydGljbGUiPjE3PC9y

ZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+R2liYnMsIEQuPC9hdXRob3I+

PGF1dGhvcj5EZXV0eiwgUC48L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxl

cz48dGl0bGU+UmVmbGVjdGlvbnMgb24gaW1wbGVtZW50aW5nIGluZHVzdHJpYWwgZWNvbG9neSB0

aHJvdWdoIGVjby1pbmR1c3RyaWFsIHBhcmsgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQ8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnkt

dGl0bGU+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBDbGVhbmVyIFByb2R1Y3Rpb248L3NlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT48L3Rp

dGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5Kb3VybmFsIG9mIENsZWFuZXIgUHJvZHVjdGlv

bjwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3BlcmlvZGljYWw+PHBhZ2VzPjE2ODMtMTY5NTwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVt

ZT4xNTwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+MTc8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwNzwveWVhcj48

L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5IYXdrZW48

L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTkzPC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MjA3OTwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJl

Yy1udW1iZXI+MjA3OTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGIt

aWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxMjk0

MjUyNTcwIj4yMDc5PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkJvb2siPjY8

L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5IYXdrZW4sIFAuPC9hdXRo

b3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPlRoZSBFY29sb2d5IG9m

IENvbW1lcmNlOiBBIGRlY2xhcmF0aW9uIG9mIHN1c3RhaW5hYmlsaXR5PC90aXRsZT48L3RpdGxl

cz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MTk5MzwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjxwdWItbG9jYXRpb24+TmV3IFlvcms8

L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPkhhcnBlckJ1c2luZXNzPC9wdWJsaXNoZXI+PHVybHM+

PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPlR1ZG9yPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+

MjAwNjwvWWVhcj48UmVjTnVtPjIwNzg8L1JlY051bT48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNzg8

L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFl

YWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTI5NDI1MjQ0OCI+MjA3ODwv

a2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJKb3VybmFsIEFydGljbGUiPjE3PC9y

ZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+VHVkb3IsIFQuPC9hdXRob3I+

PGF1dGhvcj5BZGFtLCBFLjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+QmF0ZXMsIE0uPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRo

b3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkRyaXZlcnMgYW5kIGxpbWl0YXRpb25z

IGZvciB0aGUgc3VjY2Vzc2Z1bCBkZXZlbG9wbWVudCBhbmQgZnVuY3Rpb25pbmcgb2YgRUlQcyAo

ZWNvLWluZHVzdHJpYWwgcGFya3MpOiBBIGxpdGVyYXR1cmUgcmV2aWV3PC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25k

YXJ5LXRpdGxlPkVjb2xvZ2ljYWwgRWNvbm9taWNzPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+

PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+RWNvbG9naWNhbCBFY29ub21pY3M8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+

PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4xOTktMjA3PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjYxPC92b2x1bWU+PG51

bWJlcj4yLTM8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwNjwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwv

dXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PC9FbmROb3RlPn==

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5HaWJiczwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMDc8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4yMDc3PC9SZWNOdW0+PFByZWZpeD5jLmYuYCwgPC9QcmVmaXg+PERpc3BsYXlUZXh0Pihj

LmYuLCBHaWJicyAmYW1wOyBEZXV0eiwgMjAwNzsgSGF3a2VuLCAxOTkzOyBUdWRvciwgQWRhbSwg

JmFtcDsgQmF0ZXMsIDIwMDYpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNzc8

L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFl

YWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTI5NDI1MjMyOSI+MjA3Nzwv

a2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJKb3VybmFsIEFydGljbGUiPjE3PC9y

ZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+R2liYnMsIEQuPC9hdXRob3I+

PGF1dGhvcj5EZXV0eiwgUC48L2F1dGhvcj48L2F1dGhvcnM+PC9jb250cmlidXRvcnM+PHRpdGxl

cz48dGl0bGU+UmVmbGVjdGlvbnMgb24gaW1wbGVtZW50aW5nIGluZHVzdHJpYWwgZWNvbG9neSB0

aHJvdWdoIGVjby1pbmR1c3RyaWFsIHBhcmsgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQ8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnkt

dGl0bGU+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBDbGVhbmVyIFByb2R1Y3Rpb248L3NlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT48L3Rp

dGxlcz48cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5Kb3VybmFsIG9mIENsZWFuZXIgUHJvZHVjdGlv

bjwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3BlcmlvZGljYWw+PHBhZ2VzPjE2ODMtMTY5NTwvcGFnZXM+PHZvbHVt

ZT4xNTwvdm9sdW1lPjxudW1iZXI+MTc8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwNzwveWVhcj48

L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwvdXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5IYXdrZW48

L0F1dGhvcj48WWVhcj4xOTkzPC9ZZWFyPjxSZWNOdW0+MjA3OTwvUmVjTnVtPjxyZWNvcmQ+PHJl

Yy1udW1iZXI+MjA3OTwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGIt

aWQ9IjJ6czBldHQwMWVhZXY4ZWYyOW54cGVyODJmcmR3ZHRkdnBlYSIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxMjk0

MjUyNTcwIj4yMDc5PC9rZXk+PC9mb3JlaWduLWtleXM+PHJlZi10eXBlIG5hbWU9IkJvb2siPjY8

L3JlZi10eXBlPjxjb250cmlidXRvcnM+PGF1dGhvcnM+PGF1dGhvcj5IYXdrZW4sIFAuPC9hdXRo

b3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPlRoZSBFY29sb2d5IG9m

IENvbW1lcmNlOiBBIGRlY2xhcmF0aW9uIG9mIHN1c3RhaW5hYmlsaXR5PC90aXRsZT48L3RpdGxl

cz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MTk5MzwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjxwdWItbG9jYXRpb24+TmV3IFlvcms8

L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPkhhcnBlckJ1c2luZXNzPC9wdWJsaXNoZXI+PHVybHM+

PC91cmxzPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48Q2l0ZT48QXV0aG9yPlR1ZG9yPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+

MjAwNjwvWWVhcj48UmVjTnVtPjIwNzg8L1JlY051bT48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIwNzg8

L3JlYy1udW1iZXI+PGZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48a2V5IGFwcD0iRU4iIGRiLWlkPSIyenMwZXR0MDFl

YWV2OGVmMjlueHBlcjgyZnJkd2R0ZHZwZWEiIHRpbWVzdGFtcD0iMTI5NDI1MjQ0OCI+MjA3ODwv

a2V5PjwvZm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxyZWYtdHlwZSBuYW1lPSJKb3VybmFsIEFydGljbGUiPjE3PC9y

ZWYtdHlwZT48Y29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjxhdXRob3JzPjxhdXRob3I+VHVkb3IsIFQuPC9hdXRob3I+

PGF1dGhvcj5BZGFtLCBFLjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+QmF0ZXMsIE0uPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRo

b3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkRyaXZlcnMgYW5kIGxpbWl0YXRpb25z

IGZvciB0aGUgc3VjY2Vzc2Z1bCBkZXZlbG9wbWVudCBhbmQgZnVuY3Rpb25pbmcgb2YgRUlQcyAo

ZWNvLWluZHVzdHJpYWwgcGFya3MpOiBBIGxpdGVyYXR1cmUgcmV2aWV3PC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25k

YXJ5LXRpdGxlPkVjb2xvZ2ljYWwgRWNvbm9taWNzPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+

PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+RWNvbG9naWNhbCBFY29ub21pY3M8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+

PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz4xOTktMjA3PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjYxPC92b2x1bWU+PG51

bWJlcj4yLTM8L251bWJlcj48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwNjwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjx1cmxzPjwv

dXJscz48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PC9FbmROb3RlPn==

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (c.f., Gibbs & Deutz, 2007; Hawken, 1993; Tudor, Adam, & Bates, 2006). DiscussionIn the remaining space we consider the implications of our argument and framework for teaching and practice as well as for theory and future research. In particular, we focus on ethical leadership based on virtue theory as it relates to a) formulating and implementing strategy and the four functions of management, and b) new theory and research that contrasts with the three hallmarks of consequential utilitarianism. Implications for teaching and practice While a conventional understanding of the generic strategies of cost leadership and differentiation still plays a central role among management scholars, educators, and practitioners, there has been a growing volume of what might be called “non-conventional” writing on strategy. Indeed, Michael Porter himself has tweaked his thinking, and challenges practitioners facing contemporary socio-ecological challenges to focus on creating shared value, even if doing so might not enhance short-term profit ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Porter</Author><Year>2011</Year><RecNum>2427</RecNum><DisplayText>(Porter &amp; Kramer, 1999, 2011)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2427</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1378933675">2427</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Porter, Michael E.</author><author>Kramer, Mark R.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism - and unleash a wave of innovation and growth</title><secondary-title>Harvard Business Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Harvard Business Review</full-title></periodical><pages>2-17</pages><number>January-February</number><dates><year>2011</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Porter</Author><Year>1999</Year><RecNum>2346</RecNum><record><rec-number>2346</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1355422491">2346</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Porter, Michael E.</author><author>Kramer, Mark R.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Philanthropy&apos;s new agenda: Creating value</title><secondary-title>Harvard Business Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Harvard Business Review</full-title></periodical><pages>121-130</pages><number>November-December</number><dates><year>1999</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Porter & Kramer, 1999, 2011). His work is still within the consequentialist utilitarian paradigm insofar as it is consistent with others who view social and ecological challenges as opportunities for business to maximize their long-term profits. Such tweaking may resonate with the ethics of conventional business leaders, but it may be counter-productive to addressing socio-ecological externalities that do not lend themselves to increasing profits ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Margolis</Author><Year>2003</Year><RecNum>1785</RecNum><Prefix>e.g.`, </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g., Gates, 2007; Margolis &amp; Walsh, 2003)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1785</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1785</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Margolis, J.</author><author>Walsh, J.P.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business</title><secondary-title>Administrative Science Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Administrative Science Quarterly</full-title></periodical><pages>268-305</pages><volume>42</volume><dates><year>2003</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Gates</Author><Year>2007</Year><RecNum>1832</RecNum><record><rec-number>1832</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1832</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Magazine Article">19</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Gates, William</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Remarks of Bill Gates: Harvard Commencement</title><secondary-title>Gazettte Online</secondary-title></titles><dates><year>2007</year><pub-dates><date>June 7, 2007</date></pub-dates></dates><urls><related-urls><url> 24, 2007</access-date></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g., Gates, 2007; Margolis & Walsh, 2003).In contrast, Generic Strategy 2.0 provides a helpful overarching conceptual framework for strategy formulation that assumes businesses care about society as a whole and meeting fundamental human needs, and that socio-ecological well-being is at least as important as financial well-being. It is consistent with calls for the conventional “value capture paradigm” to be supplanted by a “value creation paradigm” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Santos</Author><Year>2012</Year><RecNum>2732</RecNum><DisplayText>(Santos, 2012)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2732</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1445196847">2732</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Santos, Filipe M.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>A positive theory of social entrepreneurship</title><secondary-title>Journal of Business Ethics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Business Ethics</full-title></periodical><pages>335-351</pages><volume>111</volume><dates><year>2012</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Santos, 2012), with calls for the primary emphasis on self-interested profit maximization to be replaced by an emphasis on balancing multiple forms of well-being for multiple stakeholders ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2010</Year><RecNum>1848</RecNum><DisplayText>(Dyck &amp; Neubert, 2010)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1848</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1848</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Neubert, M.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Management: Current Practices and New Directions</title></titles><dates><year>2010</year></dates><pub-location>Boston</pub-location><publisher>Cengage / Houghton Mifflin</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Dyck & Neubert, 2010), and with calls to see a firm’s rare and inimitable resources as something to be shared, not hoarded ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Bell</Author><Year>2011</Year><RecNum>1969</RecNum><DisplayText>(Bell &amp; Dyck, 2011)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1969</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1282835658">1969</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Bell, Geoffrey G.</author><author>Dyck, Bruno</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Conventional resource-based theory and its radical alternative: A less materialist-individualist approach to strategy</title><secondary-title>Journal of Business Ethics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Business Ethics</full-title></periodical><pages>121-130</pages><volume>99</volume><dates><year>2011</year></dates><urls></urls><electronic-resource-num>10.1007/s10551-011-1159-4</electronic-resource-num></record></Cite></EndNote>(Bell & Dyck, 2011).Business schools typically teach an approach to strategy that is steeped in a mainstream consequentialist-utilitarian worldview. Although students who take a course in business ethics may be exposed to multiple worldviews that include both consequentialist-utilitarian and virtue ethics, most of their remaining studies are founded on the consequentialist-utilitarian worldview. As a result, it is difficult for students to appreciate that there are alternative moral points of view that produce different preferred outcomes with regard to everyday organizational practices. This points to the importance for the study of ethical leadership to go beyond courses in ethics, leadership, or leadership ethics. In our view, virtue theory should not be limited to a few select classes; it is a holistic paradigm that encompasses and is very relevant to all of management and business. For an example of what teaching accounting, finance, management and marketing from a virtue theory based understanding of ethical leadership might look like, see ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2013</Year><RecNum>2786</RecNum><DisplayText>(Dyck, 2013b)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2786</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1461095247">2786</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>A proven way to incorporate Catholic social thought in business school curriculae: Teaching two approaches to management in the classroom</title><secondary-title>Journal of Catholic Higher Education</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Catholic Higher Education</full-title></periodical><pages>145-163</pages><volume>32</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>2013</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>Dyck (2013b).Even though virtue theory can be used to inform alternative theory and practice for all the business functions, the only currently available classroom resources we are aware of that integrate this perspective are textbooks in the areas of Management ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2010</Year><RecNum>1848</RecNum><Suffix>`, being revised</Suffix><DisplayText>(Dyck &amp; Neubert, 2010, being revised)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1848</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1848</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Neubert, M.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Management: Current Practices and New Directions</title></titles><dates><year>2010</year></dates><pub-location>Boston</pub-location><publisher>Cengage / Houghton Mifflin</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Dyck & Neubert, 2010, being revised) and Organizational Behavior ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Neubert</Author><Year>2014</Year><RecNum>2770</RecNum><DisplayText>(Neubert &amp; Dyck, 2014)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2770</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456950668">2770</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Neubert, Mitch</author><author>Dyck, Bruno</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Organizational Behavior</title></titles><dates><year>2014</year></dates><pub-location>New York, NY</pub-location><publisher>John Wiley &amp; Sons</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Neubert & Dyck, 2014). Both these textbooks are unique because, in each chapter, they contrast and compare an approach to the topic at hand based on consequential utilitarianism, and an approach based on virtue ethics. In other words, students read about a consequential utilitarian and a virtue theory approach to goal-setting, motivation, organizing, controlling, change, strategy and so on (indeed, some of the ideas in the current chapter are drawn from and build on content from these books). In both texts, the virtue-based alternative to the dominant consequentialist-utilitarian perspective is supported by research and illustrated through the examples of vanguard practitioners. Empirical research shows that students in classes where these books are used tend to improve their critical thinking skills, change their views of ethical leadership (in particular, they come to adopt less materialistic and less individualistic views of management), and believe they have improved their ethical thinking skills ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2011</Year><RecNum>2783</RecNum><DisplayText>(Dyck, Walker, Starke, &amp; Uggerslev, 2011, 2012)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2783</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1460126063">2783</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Walker, K.</author><author>Starke, Fred</author><author>Uggerslev, K.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Addressing concerns raised by critics of business schools by teaching multiple approaches to management</title><secondary-title>Business and Society Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Business and Society Review</full-title></periodical><pages>1-27</pages><volume>116</volume><number>1</number><dates><year>2011</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2012</Year><RecNum>2782</RecNum><record><rec-number>2782</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1460125941">2782</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Walker, K.</author><author>Starke, Fred</author><author>Uggerslev, K.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Enhancing critical thinking by teaching two distinct appraoches to management</title><secondary-title>Journal of Education for Business</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Education for Business</full-title></periodical><pages>343-357</pages><volume>87</volume><number>6</number><dates><year>2012</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Dyck, Walker, Starke, & Uggerslev, 2011, 2012). We now draw from these sources to consider how a shift from the consequentialist-utilitarian worldview to a virtue ethics worldview may affect the day-to-day behavior of ethical leaders. As conceptualized by ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite AuthorYear="1"><Author>Brown</Author><Year>2006</Year><RecNum>2787</RecNum><DisplayText>Brown and Trevino (2006)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2787</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1461095313">2787</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Brown, M. E.</author><author>Trevino, Linda K.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Ethical leadership: A review and future directions</title><secondary-title>Leadership Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Leadership Quarterly</full-title></periodical><pages>595-616</pages><volume>17</volume><number>6</number><dates><year>2006</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>Brown and Trevino (2006), ethical leadership includes behaviors that reflect being a moral person as well as a moral manager. Here is a brief description of a virtue-based approach to the four functions of management: planning, organizing, leading and controlling.Ethical leadership and virtuous planning. From a virtue theory perspective, the management function of planning obligates leaders to work alongside others to set organizational goals and to develop strategy (such as the minimizer, transformer, and compounder). Such leaders exercise foresight by taking a long-term holistic perspective on planning. They use measurable goals, however they also use goals that may be difficult to measure, including goals related to human dignity, happiness and environmental sustainability ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Neubert</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>2721</RecNum><DisplayText>(Neubert &amp; Dyck, 2016)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2721</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1445027122">2721</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Neubert, Mitch</author><author>Dyck, Bruno</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Developing systainable management theory: Goal setting theory based in virtue</title><secondary-title>Management Decision</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Management Decision</full-title></periodical><pages>304-320</pages><volume>54</volume><number>2</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Neubert & Dyck, 2016). In particular, virtue theory suggests that leaders exercise the virtue of wisdom to set, align, and pursue achievement of goals that seek multiple forms of well-being for multiple stakeholders. The virtuous planner includes others in setting goals and making decisions related to their implementation to realize better-informed strategies and greater ownership of their implementation. Practically, this mutual discernment process results in goals throughout the organization that cascade down from and up to the formulation of virtuous strategies. Ethical leadership and virtuous organizing. The process of organizing human and other organizational resources helps to achieve the strategies and goals that are set in the planning function. The virtuous organizer exercises courage to challenge current organizational structures and systems which are serving the interest of the powerful but not of the powerless, and to implement organizing fundamentals that empower marginalized stakeholders with opportunity and voice. Virtue theory serves as a basis to develop organizing principles that parallel mainstream organizing fundamentals such centralization, specialization, and standardization ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Neubert</Author><Year>2014</Year><RecNum>2770</RecNum><DisplayText>(Neubert &amp; Dyck, 2014)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2770</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456950668">2770</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Neubert, Mitch</author><author>Dyck, Bruno</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Organizational Behavior</title></titles><dates><year>2014</year></dates><pub-location>New York, NY</pub-location><publisher>John Wiley &amp; Sons</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Neubert & Dyck, 2014). Instead of centralizing authority and decision making, ethical leaders promote structures that dignify others by distributing authority, information, and respect across the organization, and invite members to exercise their authority to implement participatively-developed strategies. Instead of specialization, ethical leaders promote sensitization by expanding the scope of what an organizational member thinks about and does. Interaction with others within and outside of the organization is encouraged to better understand others’ needs and the interdependencies among the community of stakeholders. Instead of standardization, ethical leaders welcome experimentation that places a premium on learning and innovation that contributes to the sustainability of the strategies.Ethical leadership and virtuous leading. Rather than an emphasis on positional authority and pressure, a virtue theory approach to leading involves listening and empowering, and welcomes community-wide influence and persuasion. The consequential utilitarian emphasis on techniques that maximize productivity are often extrinsically oriented and short-sighted. In contrast, virtuous leadership exercises temperance to resist the temptation to offer merely instrumental enticements to motivate behavior, and seeks to balance short-term and long-term interests ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Bell</Author><Year>2015</Year><RecNum>2780</RecNum><DisplayText>(Bell &amp; David, 2015)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2780</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1458241908">2780</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Bell, Geoffrey G.</author><author>David, Jannifer</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>What if corporate governance fostered executive dignity?</title><secondary-title>Journal of Applied Business and Economics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Applied Business and Economics</full-title></periodical><pages>30-45</pages><volume>17</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>2015</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Bell & David, 2015). Instead of focusing on directing and structuring the work environment for primarily instrumental outcomes, the virtuous leader focuses on serving others and nurtures intrinsic motivation through meaningful work and growth. Rather than promoting simple and immediate compliance, this approach yields greater levels of creativity and cooperative behavior among organizational members ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Neubert</Author><Year>2008</Year><RecNum>2081</RecNum><DisplayText>(Neubert, Kacmar, Carlson, Chonko, &amp; Roberts, 2008)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2081</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1294253028">2081</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Neubert, Mitch</author><author>Kacmar, K. M.</author><author>Carlson, D. S.</author><author>Chonko, L. B.</author><author>Roberts, J. A.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior</title><secondary-title>Journal of Applied Psychology</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Applied Psychology</full-title></periodical><pages>1220-1233</pages><volume>93</volume><number>6</number><dates><year>2008</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Neubert, Kacmar, Carlson, Chonko & Roberts, 2008). Such leaders are seen as servants who exhibit humility and model temperance in exercising self-control to resist temporal pressures for the sake of the long-term interests of the organization and other stakeholders ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Molyneaux</Author><Year>2003</Year><RecNum>2789</RecNum><DisplayText>(Molyneaux, 2003)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2789</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1461095483">2789</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Molyneaux, D.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>&quot;Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth&quot; - Am aspiration applicable to business?</title><secondary-title>Journal of Business Ethics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Business Ethics</full-title></periodical><pages>347-363</pages><volume>48</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>2003</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Molyneaux, 2003).Ethical leadership and virtuous controlling. Organizational control exists when organizational members know what they are supposed to do and are held accountable to do it. While this conventionally takes the form of providing specific expectations, monitoring progress, and managing exceptions, a virtuous leader facilitates control by ensuring justice. Broadly, justice is a sense of fair treatment ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Rawls</Author><Year>1958</Year><RecNum>2791</RecNum><DisplayText>(Rawls, 1958)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2791</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1461354586">2791</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Rawls, John</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Justice as fairness</title><secondary-title>Philosophical Review</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Philosophical Review</full-title></periodical><pages>164-194</pages><volume>67</volume><number>2</number><dates><year>1958</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Rawls, 1958). Beyond distributive justice, which is concerned with outcomes distributed according to inputs and thus could be a means of instrumental control, a virtuous perspective would include aspects of fairness associated with respect and inclusive processes ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Colquitt</Author><Year>2013</Year><RecNum>2788</RecNum><DisplayText>(Colquitt et al., 2013)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2788</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1461095420">2788</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Colquitt, J. A,</author><author>Scott, B. A.</author><author>Rodell, J. B.</author><author>Long, D. M.</author><author>Zapata, C. P</author><author>Conlon, D. E.</author><author>Wesson, M. J.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives</title><secondary-title>Journal of Applied Psychology</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Applied Psychology</full-title></periodical><pages>199-236</pages><volume>98</volume><number>2</number><dates><year>2013</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Colquitt et al., 2013). For example, a just approach to working toward fulfillment of a virtuous strategy ensures that everyone connected with an organization is included to some degree in providing input on implementation and that everyone also shares to some degree in success, including those external stakeholders benefited by minimizer and transformer strategies.Finally, in response to readers who might argue that, because virtue theory is based on ancient ideas it may be esoteric and difficult to operationalize or observe in contemporary organizations, we note that the little empirical evidence that we have on this topic suggests that the opposite may be true. A study by Dyck and Kleysen (2001) asked management students to observe the behaviors of video-taped managers (a sales manager, a financial controller, and a general manager), and to classify their behaviors according to three templates: 1) Mintzberg’s ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Mintzberg</Author><Year>1973</Year><RecNum>2526</RecNum><DisplayText>(1973)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2526</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1418053576">2526</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Mintzberg, Henry</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Nature of Organizational Work</title></titles><pages>217</pages><dates><year>1973</year></dates><publisher>Prentice-Hall</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(1973) three managerial roles (interpersonal, informational, decisional); 2) three of Fayol’s ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite ExcludeAuth="1"><Author>Fayol</Author><Year>1949[1919]</Year><RecNum>2785</RecNum><DisplayText>(1949 [1919])</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2785</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1460126671">2785</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Fayol, H</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>General and Industrial Management</title></titles><dates><year>1949 [1919]</year></dates><pub-location>London, UK</pub-location><publisher>Pitman</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(1949 [1919]) four functions of management (planning, organizing and controlling); and 3) the four Aristotelian cardinal virtues (wisdom, justice, courage and self-control). Perhaps surprisingly, students were able to classify managers’ actions using the Aristotelian framework 89% of the time, more than the 80% and 82% associated with ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite AuthorYear="1"><Author>Mintzberg</Author><Year>1973</Year><RecNum>2526</RecNum><DisplayText>Mintzberg (1973)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2526</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1418053576">2526</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Mintzberg, Henry</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Nature of Organizational Work</title></titles><pages>217</pages><dates><year>1973</year></dates><publisher>Prentice-Hall</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>Mintzberg (1973) and ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Fayol</Author><Year>1949[1919]</Year><RecNum>2785</RecNum><DisplayText>(Fayol, 1949 [1919])</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2785</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1460126671">2785</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Fayol, H</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>General and Industrial Management</title></titles><dates><year>1949 [1919]</year></dates><pub-location>London, UK</pub-location><publisher>Pitman</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Fayol, 1949 [1919]) respectively. In sum, the study:“provides an oft-called-for empirical basis for further work in virtue theory as an appropriate conceptual framework for the study and practice of management. The results indicate that virtue theory may be used to re-conceive our fundamental understanding of management, alongside its capacity to weigh moral judgment upon it” ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Dyck</Author><Year>2001</Year><RecNum>1889</RecNum><Suffix>: 561</Suffix><DisplayText>(Dyck &amp; Kleysen, 2001: 561)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1889</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1889</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Dyck, Bruno</author><author>Kleysen, R.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Aristotle&apos;s virtues and management thought: An empirical exploration of an integrative pedagogy</title><secondary-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Business Ethics Quarterly</full-title></periodical><pages>561-574</pages><volume>11</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>2001</year></dates><urls></urls><electronic-resource-num>10.2307/3857761</electronic-resource-num></record></Cite></EndNote>(Dyck & Kleysen, 2001: 561).Implications for research and theoryWe conclude by reviewing how a virtue theory approach to business contrasts and compares with the three main assumptions of mainstream consequential utilitarianism, and thus helps to develop theory and suggestions for research outside of the conventional (consequential utilitarian) box. First, and perhaps most importantly, virtue theory explicitly questions the mainstream consequence-centric mantra that “more is better.” Humankind lives on a finite planet with finite resources ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Meadows</Author><Year>2004</Year><RecNum>2773</RecNum><DisplayText>(Meadows et al., 2004)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2773</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1457107462">2773</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Meadows, Donella</author><author>Randers, Jorgen</author><author>Meadows, Dennis</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Limits to Growth: The 30-year update</title></titles><pages>338</pages><dates><year>2004</year></dates><pub-location>White River Junction, VT</pub-location><publisher>Chelsea Green Publishing Company</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Meadows et al., 2004). There are presently 7 billion of us, compared to 1 billion in 1804, and 2 billion in 1927. Some estimates suggest that we are already living 50% beyond the carrying capacity of the planet ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Moore</Author><Year>2013</Year><RecNum>2771</RecNum><Prefix>e.g.`, </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g., Moore &amp; Rees, 2013)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2771</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1456951534">2771</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book Section">5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Moore, Jennie</author><author>Rees, William E.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Getting to one-planet living</title><secondary-title>State of the World 2013: Is sustainability still possible?</secondary-title></titles><pages>39-50</pages><section>4</section><dates><year>2013</year></dates><pub-location>Washington, DC</pub-location><publisher>Worldwatch Institute</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g., Moore & Rees, 2013). In short, we cannot have ever-increasing “more” – it is simply unsustainable. Virtue theory provides a moral-point-of-view upon which to develop understandings of ethical leadership in a world where we need to re-learn when “enough is enough,” a world where transactions are characterized by natural chrematistics rather than unnatural chrematistics. The implications extend not only to our understanding and practice of management, or to the functions of business more generally, but also extend to the larger realm of societal institutions, norms and regulations. We invite future research that includes developing theory regarding how actors within industries can collaborate to reduce consumption, and how regulatory and societal institutions can support the development of a less materialistic and less individualistic operating climate for organizations.Second, a virtue theory understanding of ethical leadership—in direct contrast to the economics-centric nature of mainstream theory and practice—legitimizes the intuitive view that there are more important things in life than money, and that a primary focus on money is dysfunctional ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Kasser</Author><Year>2003</Year><RecNum>1780</RecNum><Prefix>e.g.`, </Prefix><DisplayText>(e.g., Kasser, 2003)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1780</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1780</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Kasser, T.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The High Price of Materialism</title></titles><dates><year>2003</year></dates><pub-location>Cambridge, MA</pub-location><publisher>Bradford Books, MIT Press</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(e.g., Kasser, 2003). More than money, people want to feel connected to others and to have a greater purpose; they desire meaningful relationships, reduced social injustice and ecological degradation, and an opportunity to leave the world in a better condition than they found it ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Giacolone</Author><Year>2004</Year><RecNum>1778</RecNum><DisplayText>(Giacolone, 2004)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1778</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1778</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Giacolone, Robert A.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>A transcendent business education for the 21st century</title><secondary-title>Academy of Management Learning &amp; Education</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Academy of Management Learning &amp; Education</full-title></periodical><pages>415-442</pages><volume>3</volume><dates><year>2004</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Giacolone, 2004). Instead of seeking only to accumulate wealth for themselves, people are motivated to contribute to the well-being of the whole (Aguinis, & Glavas, 2012); people want their actions and those of the organizations they are part of to benefit the broader world in which they live (Neubert & Dyck, 2016). Virtue theory is premised on the understanding that true happiness (eudemonia) comes from healthy relationships with others, from working in a community towards larger (non-financial) goals. In particular, it says that ethical leadership is evident when virtues are practiced in community. Future research can explore the implications of strategy formulation based on virtue theory and test the implicit hypotheses embedded in the suggestions for virtuous strategy implementation. For example, does implementing a strategy consistent based on virtue theory (Generic Strategy 2.0) enhance socio-ecological well-being (compared to Generic Strategy 1.0)? What is the effect on followers when leaders enact the four functions of management consistent with implications from a virtue theory perspective? Do followers become more virtuous themselves (as Aristotle predicted), more loyal, more productive, exhibit higher levels of organizational citizenship behavior, perceive their leaders as being more humble and more like servant leaders, and so on?Third, a virtue theory understanding of ethical leadership draws attention to the dysfunctionality of focusing on the firm-level and thereby down-playing the larger community level ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Donaldson</Author><Year>2015</Year><RecNum>2784</RecNum><Prefix>see also </Prefix><DisplayText>(see also Donaldson &amp; Walsh, 2015)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2784</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1460126227">2784</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book Section">5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Donaldson, Thomas</author><author>Walsh, J.P.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Toward a theory of business</title><secondary-title>Research in Organizational Behavior</secondary-title></titles><pages>181-207</pages><volume>35</volume><dates><year>2015</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(see also Donaldson & Walsh, 2015). Virtue theory is consistent with the intuitive understanding that the so-called “invisible hand” is dysfunctional unless it is attached to a “virtuous arm.” Adam ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite AuthorYear="1"><Author>Smith</Author><Year>2004 [1759]</Year><RecNum>1894</RecNum><Suffix>: 237</Suffix><DisplayText>Smith (2004 [1759]: 237)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>1894</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="0">1894</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Smith, Adam</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The Theory of Moral Sentiments</title></titles><pages>504</pages><dates><year>2004 [1759]</year></dates><publisher>Barnes &amp; Noble Publishing Inc.</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>Smith (2004 [1759]: 237) himself noted that people should be free to pursue their self-interest only insofar as their actions are informed by virtues like justice, self-control, practical wisdom and benevolence. Unabated pursuit of goals to maximize corporate or individual performance encourages excessive risk taking and engaging in unethical behavior ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Larrick</Author><Year>2009</Year><RecNum>2776</RecNum><DisplayText>(Larrick, Heath, &amp; Wu, 2009; Ordonez, Schweitzer, Galinsky, &amp; Bazerman, 2009)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2776</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1457108957">2776</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Larrick, R. P.</author><author>Heath, C.</author><author>Wu, G.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Goal-induced risk taking in negotiation and decision making</title><secondary-title>Social Cognition</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Social Cognition</full-title></periodical><pages>342-364</pages><volume>27</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2009</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite><Cite><Author>Ordonez</Author><Year>2009</Year><RecNum>2777</RecNum><record><rec-number>2777</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1457109024">2777</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Ordonez, L.</author><author>Schweitzer, M. E.</author><author>Galinsky, A.</author><author>Bazerman, M.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Goals gone wild: How goals systematically harm individuals and organizations</title><secondary-title>Academy of Management Perspectives</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Academy of Management Perspectives</full-title></periodical><dates><year>2009</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Larrick, Heath, & Wu, 2009; Ordonez, Schweitzer, Galinsky, & Bazerman, 2009). From a virtue theory perspective, it is foolhardy to focus on maximizing one’s own financial well-being—whether at the individual or firm level—without regard to the classic virtues, and expect that doing so will create positive outcomes for the larger socio-ecological environment. A narrow strategic focus on individualistic and materialist goals yields a limited set of outcomes organizationally and individually, whereas a virtuous approach prudently and temperately considers a broader range of outcomes for more stakeholders in both the short-term and long-term ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Neubert</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>2721</RecNum><DisplayText>(Neubert &amp; Dyck, 2016)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2721</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1445027122">2721</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Neubert, Mitch</author><author>Dyck, Bruno</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Developing systainable management theory: Goal setting theory based in virtue</title><secondary-title>Management Decision</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Management Decision</full-title></periodical><pages>304-320</pages><volume>54</volume><number>2</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>(Neubert & Dyck, 2016). Future research could contrast the effects of strategy formulation and implementation based in virtue theory with consequentialist utilitarian theory on the level of negative socio-ecological externalities produced by the firm, on levels of income inequality within the firm, and on the character of relationships with customers. For a more specific example, what might be the implications for executive compensation models, which in most cases are solidly established in the consequentialist-utilitarian worldview? In contrast, as ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite AuthorYear="1"><Author>Bell</Author><Year>2015</Year><RecNum>2780</RecNum><DisplayText>Bell and David (2015)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>2780</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="2zs0ett01eaev8ef29nxper82frdwdtdvpea" timestamp="1458241908">2780</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Bell, Geoffrey G.</author><author>David, Jannifer</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>What if corporate governance fostered executive dignity?</title><secondary-title>Journal of Applied Business and Economics</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Journal of Applied Business and Economics</full-title></periodical><pages>30-45</pages><volume>17</volume><number>4</number><dates><year>2015</year></dates><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote>Bell and David (2015) argue, from a virtue theory perspective executive compensation could focus on a range of alternative outcomes that may be related to the minimizer and transformer strategies (e.g., fostering employment of marginalized members of the community, reducing ecological externalities), and to reflect the high level of intrinsic motivation present in the executive function (Moriarty, 2005) that may be impaired by extensive reliance on financial rewards.In conclusion, ours is a bold vision. We promote virtue theory as a lens and moral foundation that enable and encourage leaders, researchers and educators to develop and promote business theory and practice that challenges dysfunctionalities associated with mainstream consequential utilitarianism. In particular, it is our hope this will enable the development of a more holistic understanding of ethical leadership that places greater emphasis on the eudemonic well-being of the whole community, and thus counteracts and subverts the negative socio-ecological externalities associated with the status quo. References ADDIN EN.REFLIST Allen, N., & Knight, M. (2011). Recycling the world's trash into cash. from , K. R. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, Ill: Richard D. Irwin.Aristotle. (2000). Politics (B. Jowett, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications Inc.Arjoon, S. (2000). Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 159-178.Asheim, B., Cooke, P., & Martin, R. (2006). The rise of the cluster concept in regional analysis and policy. In B. Asheim, P. Cooke, & R. Martin (Eds.). Clusters and Regional Development: Critical reflections and explorations, 1-29. London, UK: Routledge.Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational Theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515.Bairstow, R. (2005, July 21). [Site visit and discussions].Behnam, M., & Rasche, A. (2009). 'Are strategists from Mars and ethicists from Venus?' - Strategizing as ethical reflection. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 79-88.Bell, G. G., & David, J. (2015). What if corporate governance fostered executive dignity? Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 17(4), 30-45.Bell, G. G., & Dyck, B. (2011). Conventional resource-based theory and its radical alternative: A less materialist-individualist approach to strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 121-130.Bertrand, N. (2015, February 10). The inspiring story behind the brownies in Ben & Jerry's most popular flavors. Business Insider.Booth, W. J. (1993). Households: The moral architecture of the economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 199-236.Crespo, R. F. (2008). On Aristotle and economics. IAE Business School, Austral University. Buenos Aries Province, Argentina. Dess, G. G., & Davis, p. S. (1984). Porter's (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 467-488.Donaldson, T., & Walsh, J. P. (2015). Toward a theory of business. Research in Organizational Behavior, V. 35, 181-207.Dyck, B. (2013a). Management and the Gospel: Luke's radical message for the first and twenty-first centuries. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.Dyck, B. (2013b). A proven way to incorporate Catholic social thought in business school curriculae: Teaching two approaches to management in the classroom. Journal of Catholic Higher Education, 32(1), 145-163.Dyck, B., & Kleysen, R. (2001). Aristotle's virtues and management thought: An empirical exploration of an integrative pedagogy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(4), 561-574.Dyck, B., & Neubert, M. (2010). Management: Current Practices and New Directions. Boston: Cengage / Houghton Mifflin.Dyck, B., & Schroeder, D. (2005). Management, theology and moral points of view: Towards an altnerative to the conventional materialist-individualistic ideal-type of management. Journal of Management Studies, 42(4), 705-735.Dyck, B., Walker, K., Starke, F., & Uggerslev, K. (2011). Addressing concerns raised by critics of business schools by teaching multiple approaches to management. Business and Society Review, 116(1), 1-27.Dyck, B., Walker, K., Starke, F., & Uggerslev, K. (2012). Enhancing critical thinking by teaching two distinct appraoches to management. Journal of Education for Business, 87(6), 343-357.Dyck, B., & Wong, K. (2010). Corporate spiritual disciplines and the quest for organizational virtue. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 7(1), 7-29.Elms, H., Brammer, S., Harris, J. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). New directions in strategic management and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 401-425.Elsbach, K. D., Sutton, R. I., & Whetten, D. A. (1999). Perspectives on developing management theory, circa 1999: Moving from shrill monologues to (relatively) tame dialogues. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 627-633.Fayol, H. (1949 [1919]). General and Industrial Management. London, UK: Pitman.Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8-24.Flynn, G. (2008). The virtuous manager: A vision for leadership in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 359-372.Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 122-126.Gandz, J., & Hayes, N. (1988). Teaching business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(9), 657-669.Gates, W. (2007, June 7, 2007). Remarks of Bill Gates: Harvard Commencement. Gazettte Online.Gavin, J. H., & Mason, R. O. (2004). The virtuous organization: The value of happiness in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 379-392.Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75-91.Giacolone, R. A. (2004). A transcendent business education for the 21st century. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 415-442.Giacolone, R. A., & Thompson, K. R. (2006). Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 266-277.Gibbs, D., & Deutz, P. (2007). Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(17), 1683-1695.Gustafson, A. (2013). In defense of a utilitarian business ethic. Business and Society Review, 118(3), 325-360.Hamel, G. (2009). Moon shots for management. Harvard Business Review, 91-98.Hawken, P. (1993). The Ecology of Commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: HarperBusiness.Holmes, S., & Zellner, W. (2004). The Costco way. Retrieved April 12, 2004Hosmer, L. T. (1994). Strategic planning as if ethics mattered. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Summer 1994), 17-34.Kasser, T. (2003). The High Price of Materialism. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.Koehn, D. (1998). Virtue ethics, the firm, and moral psychology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 497-513.Kotha, S., & Vadlamani, B. L. (1995). Assessing generic strategies: An empirical investigation of two competing typologies in discrete manufacturing industries. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 75-83.Krsto, P., & Ellwood, P. (2013). Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(5), 1112-1125.Larrick, R. P., Heath, C., & Wu, G. (2009). Goal-induced risk taking in negotiation and decision making. Social Cognition, 27(3), 342-364.Leshem, D. (2016). Retrospectives: What did the ancient Greeks mean by oikonomia? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1), 225-238.Lewis, M. W., & Grimes, A. J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 672-690.MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 268-305.McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 20(1), 93-104.McKay, R. B. (2000). Consequential uitilitarianism: Addressing ethical deficiencies in the municipal landfill siting process. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(4), 289-306.Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to Growth: The 30-year update. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Meikle, S. (1994). Aristotle on money. Phronesis, 39(1), 26-44.Miller, A., & Dess, G. G. (1993). Assessing Porter's (1980) model in terms of generalizability, accuracy, and simplicity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 553-585.Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Organizational Work: Prentice-Hall.Mintzberg, H., Simons, R., & Basu, K. (2002). Beyond selfishness. Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 67-74.Molyneaux, D. (2003). "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth" - Am aspiration applicable to business? Journal of Business Ethics, 48(4), 347-363.Moore, J., & Rees, W. E. (2013). Getting to one-planet living. State of the World 2013: Is sustainability still possible? , 39-50. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.Nadkarni, S., Chen, T., & Chen, J. (2015). The clock is ticking! Executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness. Strategic Management Journal.Neubert, M., & Dyck, B. (2014). Organizational Behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Neubert, M., & Dyck, B. (2016). Developing systainable management theory: Goal setting theory based in virtue. Management Decision, 54(2), 304-320.Neubert, M., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. (2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1220-1233.Neubert, M., Wu, J.-C., & Roberts, J. (2013). The influence of ethical leadership and regulatory focus on employee outcomes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2), 269-296.Ordonez, L., Schweitzer, M. E., Galinsky, A., & Bazerman, M. (2009). Goals gone wild: How goals systematically harm individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives.Pihl, K. (2012). Acreage down, sales of organic crops up in Washington. Tri-City Herald. Retrieved from , M. (2011). What is business organizing for? The role of business in society over time. In W. Amann, M. Pirson, C. Dierksmeier, E. von Kimakowitz, & H. Spitzeck (Eds.). Business Schools Under Fire: Humanistic management education as the way forward, 41-51. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. The Academy Of Management Review, 14(4), 562-578.Porter, M. E. (1991). Toward a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 95-117.Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (1999). Philanthropy's new agenda: Creating value. Harvard Business Review(November-December), 121-130.Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism - and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review(January-February), 2-17.Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as fairness. Philosophical Review, 67(2), 164-194.Roberge, E. (2003). First fruits - Broetje Orchards. Washington Business Magazine.Robertson, C. J. (2008). An analysis of 10 years of business ethics research in Strategic Management Journal: 1996-2005. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 745-753.Rothaermel, F. T. (2015). Strategic Management (2 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Education.Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 335-351.Sinnicks, M. (2014). Practices, Bovernance, and Politics: Applying MacIntyre's Ethics to Business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 229-249.Smith, A. (1986 [1776]). The Wealth of Nations: Books I-III. London, UK: Penguin Books.Smith, A. (2004 [1759]). The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Barnes & Noble Publishing Inc.Solomon, R. C. (1992). Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3), 317-339.Sparks, B. (2003). Apple grower of the year: Ralph Broetje. American Fruit Grower(August 2003).Stahl, G. K., & De Luque, M. S. (2014). Antecedents of responsible leader behavior: A research synthesis, conceptual framework, and agenda for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 235-254.Stonehouse, G., & Snowdon, B. (2007). Meet the person: Comparative advantage revisited: Michael Porter on strategy and competitiveness. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(3), 256-273.Szaky, T. (2013). Revolution in a Bottle: How TerraCycle is redefining green business: Penguin.Tudor, T., Adam, E., & Bates, M. (2006). Drivers and limitations for the successful development and functioning of EIPs (eco-industrial parks): A literature review. Ecological Economics, 61(2-3), 199-207.Turiera, T., & Cros, S. (2013). Co-business: 50 examples of business collaboration. Barcelona, Spain.Warner, G. (2014, April 2, 2014). Opal apple verified non-GMO. GoodFruit Grower.Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Scribner's.Wood, D. J., Loney, L., & Taylor, K. (2015). Social enterprise and the solutions economy: A toolkit for Manitoba First Nations. Winnipeg, MB: AKI Energy.Wright, P. (1987). A refinement of Porter's strtegies. Strategic Management Journal, 8(1), 93-101.Zsolnai, L. (2015). Post-materialistic business models. Post-Materialistic Business: Spiritual value-orientation in renewing management, 46-77. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download

To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.

It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.

Literature Lottery

Related searches