Faculty.gordonstate.edu



Paper Three: Argumentative Research Paper Assignment: Research a topic of your choosing and take a position on that topic Audience: You plan to publish your paper in an undergraduate edition of a reputable academic journal. Your work will be read by academics throughout the country. Sources: Reputable Journal Articles, Books, Websites, Archives, Surveys, Interviews, Observations, etc. Students should have at least 6 sources All print materials must be at least 4 pages (shorter works may be used, but they do not count toward the 6-source minimum). All sources must be academic sources Length: 6-8 pages, double-spaced, 1 inch Margins, Times New Roman, Stapled, Folder, All material used to help generate the final draft should be turned in Citation: MLA Style Grading: Proposal and Annotated Bibliography 5 participation grades Argumentative Research Paper 15%?Due Date: MWPeer Review: April 23, 2018Final Draft: April 25, 2018Proposal and AB Due: April 14, 2018 TRPeer Review: April 19, 2018Final Draft: April 24, 2018Proposal and AB Due: April 17, 2018 Purpose This assignment will help you to enter into the academic conversation about a contemporary issue of your choosing that is debatable and important to society. This paper will allow you to gain a better understanding of an important issue by introducing you to multiple perspectives on that issue. This paper will also introduce you to academic research, allowing you to have more control over your text and subject matter. You will become more familiar with library research skills, online databases, web research, and scholarly journals. In this assignment, you will continue the process of synthesizing and negotiating different positions on an issue, while strengthening your ability to present a logical well-argued position on that issue. You will also become more adept at incorporating sources into your texts. Writing the Paper Unlike your previous papers, this paper will be dictated by your interests and/or your major. You will choose a contemporary debate that has an impact on society. You need to explore the different perspective on this debate and you need to be able to take an informed and supportable position on the issue. In this paper, you will 1) outline the parameters (different perspectives) of that debate in your introduction and 2) take a strong position on that subject. I have to approve your topic. You want to make sure that your topic is not too broad to discuss effectively in a short 6-8 page paper. For example, I could not do a research paper on affirmative action. I would have to narrow the topic to the affirmative action in universities. You could even limit this topic further to just affirmative action in faculty hiring or affirmative action in college admission. Your topic must be an academic topic on which scholars disagree. If you find that you cannot locate different perspectives on the issue, it means that one of two things is occurring. Either you are not looking hard enough or in the right places for different perspectives or there is no longer a debate on your issue. You have to have at least six sources. You may use only one online source (from a reputable website). At least two of your sources should come from databases. All print sources must be at least four pages long. (This includes sources that you get from databases.) Shorter sources may be used, but they do not count toward the six source minimum. You will write a Proposal and Annotated. The Proposal/Annotated Bibliography discusses the issue that you plan to explore, explains how you plan to limit it and lists the sources that you will include in the paper. A good research paper should not be limited to sources that just agree with your position. You should have at least two sources that evidence different perspectives than your own. You may want to consider having more than six sources. Using your sources as evidence, you should construct an effective argument that seeks to persuade your audience that your position is the correct position. You also want to be sure to address counterpoints to your argument throughout your paper. Remember Strong analytic topic sentences, transitions, and concluding sentences are important. Introduce both scholars and texts the first time that you refer to them Make your thesis clear and concise. An effective paper will engage quotes or claims from an opposing text and discuss how they are wrong. Each thesis claim should be discussed, using evidence, in its own body section Discuss the significance of all evidence. Evidence should be clear, logical, and suitable for your audience. In the conclusion, recap your argument and touch on the broader implications of the debate. Answer such questions as: What are the possible consequences if your argument is ignored? Where do you see this debate going? Is this particular debate indicative of something else in our culture, etc? You want to draw your paper to a close while raising your audience’s awareness to the importance of the issue. A very important part of this paper is your ability to understand multiple perspectives and analyze both texts that are in line with your position and those that conflict with your own ideas. You should be able to confront opposing viewpoints logically and with evidence. If you find that you are not finding different perspective on a topic, you may need to change your topic. It may be that scholars no longer debate the issue. It may also mean that our resources are limited at Gordon.Annotated Bibliography and ProposalThe proposal and annotated bibliography are geared toward helping students to narrow down their topic and it is a way for me to make sure that you are headed in the right direction. You will give me your potential topic. These preliminary topics can be broad, but by the due date of the Proposal and Annotated Bibliography your topic should be narrower. Write a 250-400 word proposal; you should state what you plan to research, give a brief summary of the different arguments that are important to the issue, and state your position clearly. The proposal should show that you have clearly defined and narrowed your topic. It should also show that you are aware of the different positions that scholars have on your topic. It should be very clear from the proposal what position you plan to take. Construct an annotated bibliography, which is part of the proposal, that contains the MLA formatted citations of all of your sources followed by a 7-8 sentence paragraph (for each source) that describes the basic argument of the article and the degree to which you agree with the claims of the source. (This will serve as your assessment of the source; Your assessment should be thoughtful.) At least two of the sources must be against your position. You want sources that show different perspectives.You have already practiced an annotated bibliography, so my expectations are high. There is an example of an annotated bibliography on the website. Make sure it is properly formatted. There is also an explanation of how an annotated bibliography functions on the website as well. Make sure that you review that material. I expect you to use either the current edition of the MLA style guide or the Purdue OWL in order to put your material in proper MLA format. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download