An Exploration of Ethical Dilemma Resolution by Student Affairs ...
An Exploration of Ethical Dilemma Resolution by Student Affairs Professionals
Elaine Humphrey
Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
In
Educational Leadership and Policy Studies
Steven M. Janosik, Chair
Elizabeth G. Creamer
Joan B. Hirt
Ellen Plummer
September 15, 2008
Blacksburg, Virginia
Keywords: Ethical Dilemma, Dilemma Resolution, Student Affairs, Ethical Decision Making
Copyright 2008, Elaine Humphrey
An Exploration of Ethical Dilemma Resolution by Student Affairs Professionals
Elaine Humphrey
ABSTRACT
This two-phase, sequential mixed methods study explored how student affairs
professionals resolved professional ethical dilemmas. A student affairs professional was
defined as an individual whose educational background and work experience are in
student affairs. An ethical dilemma is defined as a situation in which two ethical
principles are at odds rather than a simple matter of right versus wrong (Kitchener, 1985).
A professional ethical dilemma is an ethical dilemma in the context of a person¡¯s workrelated experience.
The first phase of the study was a qualitative exploration of how representatives
of the Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS) resolve
professional ethical dilemmas. Data were collected by interviewing the representatives.
The second phase of this study was confirmatory. An online questionnaire was
designed and administered to members of the National Association of Student Personnel
Administrators (NASPA) who held positions similar to those held by participants in the
phase one sample. The questionnaire was designed to confirm the findings from phase
one about ethical dilemma resolution.
The study found that despite the complexity of ethical dilemmas in terms of the
multiple ethical issues involved and the multiple roles they play in these dilemmas,
student affairs professionals use a relatively simple resolution process of serious
reflection and engaging others such as colleagues and university representatives to
understand the implications of the dilemma and its resolution so that they can weigh the
considerations pertaining to themselves and the wider organization within the context of
the ethical principles involved in that dilemma and make a decision that they believe is
ethical.
iii
Table of Contents
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii
List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
List of Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
Chapter 1:
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Purpose of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Research Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Significance of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Organization of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Chapter 2:
Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Ethical Dilemma Resolution in Non-higher Education Professions . . . . 19
Ethical Dilemma Resolution Theory from the Fields of Medicine,
Health Care, and Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Biomedicine and ethical dilemma resolution theory . . . . . 20
Psychology and ethical dilemma resolution theory . . . . . . 23
Health law and ethical dilemma resolution theory . . . . . . 27
Medicine, Health Care, and Law Ethical Dilemma Resolution
Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Business Ethical Dilemma Resolution Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Auditors and ethical dilemma resolution research . . . . . . 30
Financial advisors and compliance managers ethical
dilemma resolution research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
iv
Ethical Dilemma Resolution in Higher Education Professions . . . . . . . . 32
Student Affairs and Ethical Dilemma Resolution Theory . . . . . 32
Student Affairs and Ethical Dilemma Resolution Research . . . . 38
Chapter 3:
Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Purpose Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Sampling Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Phase One Data Collection Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Phase One Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Phase Two Data Collection Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Phase Two Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Chapter 4:
Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Phase One Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Theme Related to Research Question One . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Theme Related to Research Question Two . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Themes Related to Research Question Two and Research
Question Three . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Overarching Proposition About Ethical Dilemma Resolution . . . . 88
Phase Two Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Steps of Ethical Dilemma Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Considerations in Ethical Dilemma Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Overarching Proposition and Phase Two Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Chapter 5:
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
v
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- everyone else does it ethics project mrs hansen
- daria schaffeld s twoday lesson plan designed for a topic in
- classroom games a prisoners dilemma harvard university
- school finance as a moral dilemma ed
- moral dilemmas in real life springer
- the ethical dilemmas of college student suicide columbia university
- insights into tefl moral dilemma patterns in teaching practice ed
- activity 5 three tasks of adolescent identity cognitive moral and social
- lesson plan kohlberg and moral development butler university
- moral dilemma in clinical practice of nursing students
Related searches
- ethical dilemma examples in business
- ethical dilemma in business
- ethical dilemma articles in business
- ethical dilemma cases in business
- business ethical dilemma cases
- nursing ethical dilemma cases
- current ethical dilemma articles
- ethical dilemma essays
- ethical dilemma at work
- ethical dilemma nursing journal articles
- ethical dilemma in healthcare examples
- ethical dilemma questions