No

MR. SANDERS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE CHARGE OF FELONIOUS POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO SELL AND DELIVER BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE OF INTENT TO. SELL AND DELIVER WAS INSUFFICIENT . . . . . . . 7. A. Statement of standard of review . . .7. B. The State’s concession in the Court. of Appeals that the evidence of intent to sell was insufficient was admirably ................
................