PDF School Performance Plan - Clark County School District

Nevada Department of Education

Guy, Addeliar ES 2016-2017 Clark County School District

School Performance Plan

School Name

Guy, Addeliar ES

Address (City, State, Zip Code, Telephone):

4028 W La Madre Way N Las Vegas, NV 89031-4806, (702) 799-3150

Superintendent/Assistant Chief:

Pat Skorkowsky / Andrea Klafter-Rakita

For Implementation During The Following Years:

2016-2017

The Following MUST Be Completed:

Title I Status:

Served

Designation:

NA

Grade Level Served:

Elementary

Classification:

3 Star

NCCAT-S:

Not Required

*1 and 2 Star Schools Only:

Please ensure that the following documents will be available upon request

Use of Core Instructional Materials

Scheduling

Model School Visits

Members of Planning Team * ALL Title I schools must have a parent on their planning team that is NOT a district employee.

Name of Member Lisa Dickson Opal Ivey Lisa Mahoney Laura Caisse Linda Torrey Lisa Jablonski

Position Parent

Assistant Principal Second Grade Teacher

Fifth Grade Teacher First Grade Teacher

Music Specialist

Name of Member Wendy Garrett Debby Schmitt Deb Robinson Holly Jones Nicole Merkel Heather Beasley

Position Principal Kindergarten Teacher Fourth Grade Teacher Intermediate DHH Teacher Third Grade Teacher Inter Autism

Last Date Review/Revised By Planning Team - 12/19/2016

Page 1

Nevada Department of Education - June 2016

Nevada Department of Education Elizabeth Shay

Learning Strategist

Guy, Addeliar ES 2016-2017 Clark County School District

Last Date Review/Revised By Planning Team - 12/19/2016

Page 2

Nevada Department of Education - June 2016

Nevada Department of Education

COMPONENT I: COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA)

Guy, Addeliar ES 2016-2017 Clark County School District

DATA REVIEWED & ANALYZED:

Based on your schools NSPF results, identify what additional data have been reviewed and analyzed in development of the SPP.

School Data For General Education Including FRL

Nevada School Performance Framework (NSPF) Statewide Assessments Formative Assessments Practice NA NA Other: Other:

English Language Learner (ELL) Data

Nevada School Performance Framework (NSPF) Achievement Gap Data NA NA NA Other: Other:

Special Education Data

Nevada School Performance Framework (NSPF) Achievement Gap Data NA NA NA Other: Other:

Summary Statement: Please provide a brief description for how the analyzed data will impact your Inquiry and Action Planning process.

The most recent statewide summative assessment data was analyzed and we identified the following... Positive Trends: Our IEP subgroup scored 5% above the district. 2015-2016 SBAC Math data shows that overall math proficiency was 29%, that compares with the district average of 32%. Proficiency by grade was 3rd - 42%, 4th - 24%, 5th - 22%. 2015-2016 ELA data shows that overall ELA proficiency was 41%, that compares with the district average of 47%. Proficiency by grade was: 3rd - 41%, 4th - 41%, and 5th - 41%. 58 3rd grade students were at level 1 or 2. Tutoring, Tier II intervention school-wide program were implemented as we all CTT support. Area of Concerns: In ELA, in comparison to the school district we scored 6.78% lower. In Math, in comparison to the school district we scored 8.57% lower. We have determined to address these concerns within Goal 1 and Goal 2 of our plan.

Last Date Review/Revised By Planning Team - 12/19/2016

Page 3

Nevada Department of Education - June 2016

Nevada Department of Education

Guy, Addeliar ES 2016-2017 Clark County School District

COMPONENT II: Inquiry Process & Action Plan Design- Priority Need/Goal 1

Based on the CNA, identify all that apply:

General Education

FRL

ELL

IEP

Other

Priority Need/Goal 1: Increase Grade 3 proficiency rates in reading.

Root Causes: As evidenced by 3rd grade SBAC state assessment results, lack of effective Tier I instruction, alignment and rigor of core programs to NVACS. Additionally, students demonstrated difficulty with informational and literary text due to the inability to transfer oral language to written communication. Inconsistent practices and strategies on grade level and content vocabulary, inconsistent rigorous learning opportunities, and lack of foundational readiness skills. Lack of exposure to technology.

Measurable Objective 1: Increase the percent of 3rd grade students proficient in reading from 42% to 50% by 2017 as measured by state assessments.

Monitoring Status

On Task

ACTION PLAN

MONITORING PLAN

Action Step (please only list one action step per box)

Resources and Amount Needed for

Implementation (people, time, materials, funding sources)

List Artifacts/Evidence of Progress:

Information (Data) that will verify the action step is in progress or has occurred.

1.1 Professional Development (Required)

Teachers will participate in SBCT data sessions, grade level STPT to analyze and unpack grade level standards, Read by Grade 3 training, Lexia, and technology.

Learning strategist, Read by Grade 3 Team, Literacy Framework training (K-5), DRA kits, diagnostic assessments.

Continuation From Last Year: Yes

Professional Development agendas, Professional Development sign-in sheets, classroom observations, SLGs and SLPPs, and NEPF.

List Timeline, Benchmarks, and Position Responsible

Monitoring Status

NCCAT-S Indicators:

Professional Development Agendas, Professional Development sign-in sheets, and classroom observations. Administration, Oct.- May.

On Task

Comments:

Action Step Last Date Review/Revised By Planning Team - 12/19/2016

Resources and Amount Needed Page 4

List Artifacts/Evidence

Timeline and Position Responsible

Monitoring Status

Nevada Department of Education - June 2016

Nevada Department of Education

1.2 Family Engagement (Required)

Teacher and students will monitor and track reading progress/student achievement on grade level NVACS through the use of parent/teacher/student conferencing and participation in Math/Literacy Nights. Parent Training and SOT.

Comments:

Weekly PLC - no funding needed. Parent/Teacher/Student handouts (PSTAPT) December 2016 - no funding needed. Math/Literacy Nights - Title funding, Learning Strategist

Guy, Addeliar ES 2016-2017 Clark County School District

Continuation From Last

Year: Yes Parent sign in sheets, parent surveys, Exit Surveys, and agendas.

NCCAT-S Indicators:

Teacher observations, Parent sign in sheets, Exit SurveyAdministration, Weekly PLC minutes, Administration

On Task

1.3 Curriculum/Instruction/Assessment (Required)

Teachers will use student data to provide effective Tier I and Tier II ELA instruction that is NVACS based, rigorous, develops and extends vocabulary, and scaffolds learning for all students. Assistance for students struggling with Tier I and Tier II will be provided by teachers and supported by CTTs, Learning Strategist, and identified support staff, based on data from formative assessments. Literacy tutoring. Students will receive instruction from a technology teacher.

Comments:

Instructional Resources for CTTs 1 CTT position (Title I), Learning Strategist and Identified support staff (Title I). Weekly, PLC/SBCT Time - No funding needed Teachers will provide weekly tutoring (No funding). Additional targeted students will receive tutoring (ELL/Title I) Chromebooks

Continuation From Last

Year: Yes

AIMSweb ELA data, STAR data, Interim Assessment data, SBAC data, WIDA, Tier II diagnostic assessments, classroom assessments.

NCCAT-S Indicators:

Teacher Observations Monthly (Oct. - May) Administration, PD Learning Strategist , Weekly PLC minutes Weekly Administration,

On Task

1.4 Other (Optional)

Continuation From Last Year:

NCCAT-S Indicators: N/A

Comments:

Last Date Review/Revised By Planning Team - 12/19/2016

Page 5

Nevada Department of Education - June 2016

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download