123seminarsonly.com



Keywords: Ant colony, Swarm, TSP

Abstract

The complex social behaviours of ants have been much studied, and computer scientists are now finding that these behaviour patterns can provide models for solving difficult combinatorial optimization problems. The attempt to develop algorithms inspired by one aspect of ant behavior, the ability to find shortest paths, has become the field of ant colony optimization (ACO). The ant colony optimization algorithm (ACO), introduced by Marco Dorigo, in the year 1992, is a probabilistic technique for solving computational problems which can be reduced to finding good paths through graphs. This paper presents an overview of this rapidly growing field, from its theoretical inception to practical applications, including descriptions of many available ACO algorithms and their various applications to solve NP-Hard Problems. In this paper, we also discuss the Travelling Salesman Problem.

1. Introduction.

1. Behaviour of Social Animals

Insects are the most diverse group of animals on the earth. Many insects possess very sensitive organs of perception. perception. Swarm Intelligence(SI) is an artificial technique based on the study of collective, self-organized systems. SI systems

Many of numerous species of insects that live in colonies manifest group integration and division of labour. Swarm intelligence are typically made up of a population of simple agents interacting locally with one another and with their environment. Although there is normally no centralized control structure dictating how individual agents should behave, local interactions between such agents often lead to the emergence of global behaviour.

The rest of the paper is divided as follows: Sections 1.2 and 1.3 discuss the Ant Colony and other Social Insect Behaviour approaches. Section 2 gives a theoretical overview and an example of ACO. Variants of ACO are briefly explained in Section 3. In Section 4, the application aspects of ACO to real world problems is discussed with emphasis on the TSP. The next section gives the merits and demerits of ACO. Finally the conclusion and references are given.

2. Ant Colonies

Ant Communication is accomplished primarily through chemicals called pheromones. Ants communicate to one another by laying down pheromones along their trails. Other ants perceive the presence of pheromone and tend to follow paths where pheromone concentration is higher.

Over time, however, the pheromone trail starts to evaporate, thus reducing its attractive strength. The more time it takes for an ant to travel down the path and back again, the more time the pheromones have to evaporate. A short path gets marched over faster, and thus the pheromone density remains high as it is laid on the path as fast as it can evaporate.

[pic]

Figure 1:Ant Behaviour

A. Ants in a pheromone trail between nest and food; B. An obstacle interrupts the trail; C. Ants find two paths to go around the obstacle; D. A new pheromone trail is formed along the shorter path.

Pheromone evaporation has also the advantage of avoiding the convergence to a locally optimal solution. If there were no evaporation at all, the paths chosen by the first ants would tend to be excessively attractive to the following ones. In that case, the exploration of the solution space would be constrained. Thus, when one ant finds a good path to a food source, other ants are more likely to follow that path, and positive feedback eventually leaves all the ants following a single path. Figure 1 describes this ant behaviour.

3. Other Social Insects for Optimization

Examples of other optimisation systems which can be found in nature include bird flocking, animal herding, bacteria moulding and fish schooling, pedestrians, traffic. The beauty of the entire phenomenon lies in the seemingly intelligent group behaviour that emerges from multiple individual animals.

2. Ant Colony Optimization.

2.1 The Theory of Ant Colonies

The distinctive behaviour of ants has been extensively studied and has inspired a number of methods and techniques among which the most successful is the general purpose optimization technique known as Ant Colony Optimization (ACO). ACO exploits a similar mechanism similar to that of the foraging behaviour of some ant species. From the early nineties, when the first ant colony optimization algorithm was first proposed, ACO attracted the attention of increasing numbers of researchers and many successful applications are now available. Moreover, a substantial corpus of theoretical results is becoming available that provides useful guidelines to researchers and practitioners in further applications of ACO

2.2 Characteristics of ACO

Stigmergy is a method of communication in systems in which the individual parts of the system communicate with one another by modifying their local environment. The two main characteristics of stigmergy that differentiate it from other forms of communication are:

i) Stigmergy is an indirect, non-symbolic form of communication mediated by the environment: insects exchange information by modifying the environment; and

ii) Stigmergic information is local: it can only be accessed by those insects that visit the locus in which it was released (or its immediate neighbourhood)

2.3 The Double Bridge Experiment

Deneubourg et al. thoroughly investigated the behaviour of ants. In an experiment known as the “double bridge experiment”( Figure 2) the nest of a colony of Argentine ants was connected to a food source by two bridges of equal lengths. In such a setting, ants start to explore the surroundings of the nest and eventually reach the food source. Along their paths, the ants deposit pheromone. Initially, each ant randomly chooses one of the two bridges. However, due to random fluctuations, after some time, one of the two bridges presents a higher concentration of pheromones than the other and , thus, attracts more ants. This brings a further amount of pheromone on that bridge making it more attractive with the result that after some time the whole colony converges towards the use of the same bridge.

This colony–level behaviour based on autocatalysis , that is , on the exploitation of positive feedback , can be used by ants to find the shortest path between a food source and their nests. a variant of the “double bridge experiment”, in which one bridge is significantly longer than the other was considered. In this case, the stochastic fluctuations in the initial choice of a bridge

are much reduced and a second mechanism.

[pic][pic]

Figure 2: Experimental Setup for the double bridge experiment (a) branches have equal lengths;(b) branches have different lengths.

plays an important role: the ants choosing by chance the short bridge are the first to reach the nest. The short bridge, therefore, receives pheromone earlier than the long one and this fact increases the probability that further ants select it rather than the long one. A model of this observed behaviour was developed.

2.4 ACO Procedure - Pseudo Algorithm

The ACO pseudo-algorithm is shown below. After initialization, the algorithm iterates over three phases: at each iteration, a number of solutions are constructed by the ants; these solutions are then improved through a local search (this step is optional), and finally the pheromone is updated.

1. (Initialization)

Set parameters, initialize pheromone trails.

Initialize τιψ, for each ι,ψ

2. (Construction of AntSolution)

For each ant k do

Repeat

Compute ηιψ for each ι,ψ.

Choose in probability the state to

move into

Append the chosen move to move the kth ant’s set tabu.

Until ant k has completed its solution.

[apply a local search(optional)]

3. (Pheromone Trail Update)

For each ant move ( ι,ψ) do

Compute ∆τιψ and update the trail

values

4. (Terminating condition)

If not (end_condition) go to step-2.

3. Variants of the ACO Algorithm.

Different ant colony optimization algorithms have been proposed .The original ACO algorithm is known as Ant System and was proposed in the early nineties. It’s main characteristic is that at each iteration, the pheromone values are updated by all the ants that have built a solution in the iteration itself.

Since then a number of other ACO algorithms, variants of the original Ant System, were presented, of which the two most successful algorithms were MAXMIN and Ant Colony system (ACS).

MAXMIN is an improvement over the original AntSystem. Its characterizing elements are that only the best ant updates the pheromone trails and that the value of the pheromone is bound.

The most interesting contribution of ACS is the introduction of a local pheromone update in addition to the pheromone update performed at the end of the construction process. The local update done diversifies the search performed by subsequent ants during an iteration: by decreasing the pheromone concentration on the traversed edges, ants encourage subsequent ants to choose other edges an, hence, to produce different solutions. This makes it less likely that several ants produce identical solutions during one iteration.

4. Applications of ACO in NP-Hard Problems.

In recent years, the interest of the scientific community in ACO has risen sharply. In fact, several successful applications of ACO to a wide range of different discrete optimization problems are now available. The large majority of these applications are to NP-Hard problems; that is, to problems for which the best known algorithms that guarantee to identify an optimal solution have exponential time worst case complexity. The use of such algorithms is often infeasible in practice, and ACO algorithms can be useful for quickly finding high quality solution. Other popular applications are to dynamic shortest path problems arising in telecommunication networks problems. The number of successful applications to academic problems has motivated people to adopt ACO for the solution of industrial problems, proving that this computation of intelligence technique is also useful in real world applications.

4.1 Application to telecommunication networks

ACO algorithms have shown to be a very effective approach for routing problems in telecommunication networks where the properties of the system, such as the cost of using links or the availability of the nodes, vary over time. ACO algorithms were first applied to routing problems in circuit-switched networks (such as telephone networks) and then in packet-switched networks (such as local area networks or the internet). A well known example is AntNet which has been extensively tested, in simulation, on different networks and under different traffic patterns, proving to be highly adaptable and robust. A comparison with state-of-the-art routing algorithms has shown that, in most of the considered situations, AntNet outperforms its competitors.

Ant-based algorithms have given rise to several other routing algorithms, enhancing performance in a variety of wired network scenarios.

2. Application to Industrial Problems

The success of ACO on academic problems has raised the attention of a number of companies that have started to sue ACO algorithms for real-world applications. They have applied ACO to a number of scheduling problems such as a continuous two-stage flow shop problem with finite reservoirs. The problems modeled included various real world constraints such as setup times, capacity restrictions, resource compatibilities and maintenance calendars. Some researchers have developed a set of tools for the solution of vehicle-routing problems whose optimization algorithms are based on ACO. Examples of companies who have successfully used ACO are EuroBios, AntOptima, DYVOIL, AntRoute, Migros (the main Swiss supermarket chain) and Barilla (the main Italian pasta maker).

3. Conventional ACO for the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP)

The traveling salesman problem (TSP) is a problem in discrete or combinatorial optimization. It is a prominent illustration of a class of problems in computational complexity theory which are hard to solve. The problem states that : Given a number of cities and the costs of traveling from any city to any other city, what is the cheapest round-trip route that visits each city exactly once and then returns to the starting city?

In ant colony optimization, the problem is tackled by simulating a number of artificial ants moving on a graph that encodes the problem itself: each vertex represents a city and each edge represents a connection between two cities. A variable called pheromone is associated with each edge and can be read and modified by ants. Ant colony optimization is an iterative algorithm. At each iteration , a number of artificial ants are considered. Each of them builds a solution by walking from vertex to vertex on the graph with the constraint of not visiting any vertex that she has already visited in her walk. At each step of the solution construction, an ant selects the following vertex to be visited according to a stochastic mechanism that is biased by the pheromone: when in vertex i, the following vertex is selected stochastically

among the previously unvisited ones. In particular, if j has not been previously visited, it can be selected with a probability that is proportional to the pheromone associated with the edge (i,j). At the end of the iteration, on the basis of the quality of the solution constructed by the ants, the pheromone values are modified in order to bias ants in future iterations to construct solutions similar to the best ones previously constructed. In Figure 3, ACO-TSP is given.

[pic]

Figure 3 :An ant in city i chooses the next city to visit via a stochastic mechanism: If j has not been previously visited, it can be selected with a probability that is proportional to the pheromone associated with edge (i.j).

Many of the tackled NP-Hard problems can be considered as falling into one of the following categories: routing problems as they arise for example in the distribution of goods; assignment problems, where a set of items (objects, activities etc.) has to be assigned to a given number of resources(location, agents etc.)subject to some constraints; scheduling problems , which –in the widest sense- concerned with the allocation of scare resources to tasks over time; and subset problems , where a solution to a problem is considered to be a selection of a subset of available items. In addition, ACO has been successfully applied to other problems emerging in fields such as machine learning and bioinformatics.

5. The Merits and Demerits of ACO.

Some of the inherent advantages of ACO algorithms are as follows :

• The Positive Feedback in ACO accounts for rapid discovery of good solutions

• ACO employs Distributed computation, which avoids premature convergence.

• The greedy heuristic used in ACO helps find an acceptable solution in the early solution in the early stages of the search process.

Some of the disadvantages in ACO algorithms are:

• These algorithms have slower convergence than other Heuristics.

• They performed poorly for TSP problems larger than 75 cities.

• There is no centralized processor to guide the Ant System towards good solutions.

6. Conclusion

Ant Colony Optimization has been and continues to be a fruitful paradigm for designing effective combinatorial optimization solution algorithms. After more than ten years of studies, both its application effectiveness and its theoretical groundings have been demonstrated, making ACO one of the most successful paradigm in the metaheuristic area.

Fifteen years ago, when the first ACO algorithm was introduced, taking inspiration from ants for designing optimization algorithms seemed a crazy idea. The many successful applications have changed our perspective: what seemed a far-out idea is now considered one of the most promising approaches to the approximate solution of difficult optimization problems.

This paper is a brief write-up of the ideas and inspirations behind ACO. The effectiveness of ACO is justified by the variety of applications of ACO. This being an emerging field of the Swarm Intelligence area, much more exploration and experimentation can be done in future.

7. References

[1] Marco Dorigo, Mauro Birattari, and Thomas Stiitzli, “Ant Colony Optimization: Artificial Ants as a Computational Intelligence Technique”, IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, November 2006, pp. 28-36.

[2] J.-L.Deneubourg, S.Aron, S.Goss, and J.-M.Pasteels, “The Self Organizing Exploratory Pattern of the Argentine Ant”, Journal of Insect Behaviour, Vol.3, p.159, 1990.

[3] Official website of the Ant Colony Metaheuristic: aco-

[4] Other Related links: en.wiki/Swarm_intelligence

-----------------------

Ant Colony Optimization - A Novel Approach to Solve NP-Hard Problems

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download