Mark Scheme (Results) June 2019

Mark Scheme (Results) June 2019

Pearson Edexcel Level 1/Level 2 GCSE (9?1) in English Language (1EN0) Paper 2: Non-fiction and Transactional Writing

73

1

2

Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications

Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK's largest awarding body. We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and specific programmes for employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites at or btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our contact us page at contactus.

Pearson: helping people progress, everywhere

Pearson aspires to be the world's leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds of people, wherever they are in the world. We've been involved in education for over 150 years, and by working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international reputation for our commitment to high standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find out more about how we can help you and your students at: uk

Summer 2019 Publications Code 1EN0_02_1906_MS All the material in this publication is copyright ? Pearson Education Ltd 2019

3

General marking guidance

? All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners must mark the last candidate in exactly the same way as they mark the first.

? Mark schemes should be applied positively. Candidates must be rewarded for what they have shown they can do rather than be penalised for omissions.

? Examiners should mark according to the mark scheme ? not according to their perception of where the grade boundaries may lie.

? All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be awarded. Examiners should always award full marks if deserved, i.e. if the answer matches the mark scheme. Examiners should also be prepared to award zero marks if the candidate's response is not worthy of credit according to the mark scheme.

? Where some judgment is required, mark schemes will provide the principles by which marks will be awarded and exemplification/indicative content will not be exhaustive.

? When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the mark scheme to a candidate's response, a senior examiner must be consulted before a mark is given.

? Crossed-out work should be marked unless the candidate has replaced it with an alternative response.

Marking guidance ? specific

? The marking grids have been designed to assess student work holistically. The grids identify the Assessment Objective being targeted by the level descriptors.

? When deciding how to reward an answer, examiners should consult both the indicative content and the associated marking grid(s). When using a levels-based mark scheme, the `best fit' approach should be used.

? Examiners should first decide which descriptor most closely matches the answer and place it in that level.

? The mark awarded within the level will be decided based on the quality of the answer and will be modified according to how securely all bullet points are displayed at that level.

? In cases of uneven performance, the points above will still apply. Candidates will be placed in the level that best describes their answer according to the Assessment Objective described in the level. Marks will be awarded towards the top or bottom of that level depending on how they have evidenced each of the descriptor bullet points.

? Indicative content is exactly that ? it consists of factual points that candidates are likely to use to construct their answer. It is possible for an answer to be constructed without mentioning some or all of these points, as long as they provide alternative responses to the indicative content that fulfil the requirements of the question. It is the examiner's responsibility to apply their professional judgment to the candidate's response in determining if the answer fulfils the requirements of the question.

4

Paper 2 Mark Scheme

The table below shows the number of raw marks allocated for each question in this mark scheme.

Component Component 2 ? Non-fiction and Transactional Writing Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7a Question 7b Question 8 or 9

AO1

Assessment Objectives

AO2

AO3

AO4 AO5

AO6

Total marks

2

2

2

2

15

15

1

1

1

1

15

15

6

6

14

14

24

16

40

5

Question Number

1

Section A: Reading

AO1: Identify and interpret explicit and implicit information and ideas

Accept any two of the following answers, based on lines 1-2: (further on) along the front, clutch, large, (virtually) indistinguishable, vacancy signs (perched in their windows).

Mark (2)

Question Number 2

AO1: Identify and interpret explicit and implicit information and ideas Accept any reasonable answer based on lines 5-10. Quotations and candidate's own words are acceptable.

Mark (2)

For example: ? `white-haired' (1) ? 'widow' (1) ? a kind woman (1) ? `fondness for children' (1) ? a man with a `grasping manner' (1) ? a man smoking a cigarette (1) ? a man with the `sort of cough that makes you wonder where he

puts the phlegm' (1)

6

In responses to the question, examiners should be aware of the different ways

candidates may structure their responses. There should be sufficient evidence analysing

both language and structure to reward responses. Responses that are unbalanced

cannot access Level 3 or above, where analysis of both language and structure

is required.

Question Indicative content Number

3

Reward responses that analyse how the text uses language and structure to

interest and engage the reader.

Responses may include the following points about the language of the text: ? the writer uses a collective noun to show the close nature of the

guesthouses: `a clutch of guesthouses' ? adverbs are used throughout the text to create interest in and emphasis

on description: `virtually', `instantly', `gloomily', `intelligently', `grubbily' ? powerful verbs are used to create a sense of adventure and to contrast

with the norm: `heightened', `turn and flee', `emerged', `revealed', `illuminated'; contrasting with: `choose', `knew', `said' ? personification is used to relate the guesthouses and their facilities to the reader, creating irony in the appearance versus reality of them: `there stood a clutch of guesthouses', `another boasted, in special jaunty italics', `its board promised a colour TV and coffee-making facilities' ? the contrasting description of the typical proprietors prepare the reader for what is to come, contrasting clean purity of: `snowy sheets and sparkling bathroom porcelain' with dirty and grubby `drooping fag' and `the sort of cough that makes you wonder where he puts the phlegm' ? description with double or triple adjectives is used to create emphasis and humour: `special jaunty italics', `mysterious ceiling stains', `single ill-fitting sash windows', `curling floor tiles' ? the use of adverb and superlative together creates emphasis and irony: `the very most you could hope for was hot and cold in all rooms' ? references to the senses create vivid descriptions: `heightened my sense of unease and doom', `looked reasonable enough', `mildewy pong', `faintly illuminated by a distant light' ? the writer uses formal, literary language to create a sense of narrative: `stayed my retreat', `little short of a swindle', `out of the question'; this contrasts with some use of informal, colloquial language which has a casual, relaxed effect: `drooping fag', `pong', `let me be charitable', `muck' ? alliteration is used to create interest and emphasis: `short of a swindle', `single ill-fitting sash window', `corner and crack' ? the image of `those mysterious ceiling stains that bring to mind a neglected corpse in the room above' creates a sense of a horror story ? metaphor is used to emphasise the negativity: `Fingers of icy wind slipped through the single ill-fitting sash window'.

Responses may include the following points about the structure of the text: ? the extract is structured as a narrative, starting with the idea of a choice

that has the potential to go badly, for example the writer uses a conjunction to start a sentence at the end of the first paragraph, creating a sense of foreboding: `Such, I felt gloomily certain, would be the case tonight' ? the use of a question contrasts with the statements in the text and creates a sense of the reader being involved in the decision: `How could I possibly choose intelligently among such a range of options?' ? the writer uses contrasting sentence length, using long sentences to layer description for the reader and one short sentence for impact: `Well, it's so hard to say no'

7

? the use of the lists of amenities brings description to life with precise details: ``Colour TV', `En Suite All Rooms', `Hospitality Trays'', `satellite TV and a trouser press', `colour TV and coffee-making facilities'

? the brief dialogue between the writer and the proprietor creates humour and contrast with the detailed description

? the writer uses dashes and ellipsis to emphasise points and create humour: ``Current Fire Certificate' ? something I had never thought to ask for in a B&B', `? its board promised a colour TV and coffee-making facilities, about all I require these days for a lively Saturday night ?', `? let me be charitable ?'

? the text uses coordinated structures to layer the negative description: `damp plaster and peeling wallpaper', `grubbily matted carpet and those mysterious ceiling stains', `curling floor tiles and years of accumulated muck'. (15 marks)

8

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download