PERRLA Version 6 For APA



Evidence Based Practice: To Reduce Blood Pressure in African American MalesPierre Nkurunziza RN, BSNNeeta Monteiro RN, BSNDavid Buchanan RN, BSNSarah Fisher RN, BSNWright State University-Miami Valley College of Nursing and HealthNUR 788 – Spring 2012Table of ContentsCover page...………………………………………………………………………………………………….………..1Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………3Problem Statement ……………………………………………………………………….…………………………4-6Planning the Practice Change Team ……………………………………………………………………………..6-8Critical Appraisal of Evidence ……………………………………………………….……………………………8-10Plan a Pilot Test of the Change ………………………………………………….……………………………..10-15Evaluation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………...15-18Human Subjects Concerns ………………………………………………………….…………………………..18-19Budget …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………19Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….………………………………..19-20References ……………………………………………………………….……………………………………….21-23Appendices……………………………………………………………….……………………………………….24-29Appendix A ………………………………………………………..24Appendix B ………………………………………………………..25Appendix C … (refer to a separate document)………………..25Appendix D ………………………………………………………..26Appendix E ………………………………………………………..27Appendix F………………………………………………………...28Appendix G ………………………………………………………..29AbstractAccording to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012), African Americans [AA] (44.4%) have the highest prevalence of hypertension (HTN) when compared to Whites (32.6%) and Mexican Americans (28.3%). The research team proposed a culturally-sensitive educational intervention via tele-monitoring, delivered by Advance Practice Nurses (APNs) in a private family practice setting. The goal is to reduce blood pressure (BP) readings in AA males aged > 40 years to within normal range of < 120/80 mmHg over a six-month period. Stakeholders include patients, family members, physician, APNs and private practice staff. Resistance may come from staff and APNs because of additional work responsibilities in managing patients. Strengths of change include decreasing BP and reducing the sequelae associated with HTN. Following a rigorous and comprehensive search of the evidence since 2001, a total of 12 studies were identified. One study was a meta-analysis, while the remaining eleven studies were Randomized Control Trials. Evidence across the studies supported the utilization of APNs and tele-monitoring to reduce HTN amongst AA men aged 40 years and older. Rosswurm and Larrabee’s framework was chosen to guide the EBPCP. The setting will be a medium size solo family practice office. A purposive sample of 60 AA men will be recruited by two APNs during a routine family practice visit encouraging participation in the intervention. The EBPCP will consist of a tailored, culturally sensitive educational intervention incorporating tele-monitoring by APNs. The intervention will be measured using various instruments, including BP and weight via anthropometric measures, exercise pattern (Lorig et al., 1996), diet type and frequency (ordinal scale), medication adherence (Morisky’s scale), smoking and alcohol consumption (self-reported on a nominal scale) and patient satisfaction (investigator-developed open-ended questionnaire). These will be measured at baseline, and again at one month, three months and six months. Donabedien’s evaluation model will be used to evaluate the intervention. Problem StatementThe problem of interest for the proposed practice change is hypertension (HTN). HTN is the number one silent killer among adults in the United States (US). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] (2012), African Americans [AA] (44.4%) have the highest prevalence of HTN compared to Whites (32.6%) and Mexican Americans (28.3%). The World Health Organization [WHO] (2011) attributes HTN as the leading cause of cardiovascular mortality worldwide. In 2008, the prevalence of HTN among adults aged 18 years and older was 68 million (31%) and has shown no improvement in the past decade. Less than half of those with HTN have their condition under control.? It affects one in three adults in the US and contributes to one out of every seven deaths and nearly half of all cardiovascular disease--related deaths in the US. In the state of Ohio, HTN is more prevalent among men (33.1%) compared to women (30.4%); when considering races AAs have a higher prevalence (40.4%) compared to whites (31.1%). In 2010, the related health care cost of HTN in the US was about $76.6 billion (CDC, 2011). The American Heart Association, Institute of Medicine, WHO and Healthy People 2020 aim to reduce the prevalence of hypertension by assessing high risk factors, providing education and eliminating gaps in the treatment plan. Although research on treatments is advancing, disparities in HTN exists among AAs which indicates a need for more evidence based research to close this widening gap.Healthy People 2020 have included HTN reduction among its objectives. The baseline rate for this decade was 29.9%. The target rate is projected to be 26.9% with an estimated 10% improvement (Department of Health and Human Services, 2012). This goal cannot be accomplished without turning the focus onto the population group with the highest prevalence of HTN in the US which is largely constituted by AA males, aged 40 years and older. AAs develop high blood pressure (BP) more often, and at an earlier age, compared to whites and Mexican Americans (CDC, 2012). The American Heart Association (2012), describes HTN as an abnormal high measurement of the force exerted on the arterial walls by the blood pumped from the heart. Optimal blood pressure is less than 120/80 mmHg. HTN is defined as a consistent elevation of the systolic BP above 140 mmHg and a diastolic BP above 90 mmHg. Consequently when HTN is left untreated after a while, sequelae can be detrimental and multiple systems can be affected such as cardiovascular, neurology, renal, ophthalmology, reproductive, and respiratory. High risk factors for high BP are advancing age, obesity, males, AA heritage, family history of hypertension, atherosclerosis, diabetes, smoking, high-salt diet, excessive alcohol consumption and emotional stress (National Institute of Health, 2012). The possible interventions to encounter HTN are: (1) The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) eating plan. DASH is a simple heart healthy diet that can help prevent or lower high BP. This diet is low in sodium, cholesterol, saturated and total fat, and high in fruits and vegetables, fiber, potassium, and low-fat dairy products. (2) Monitoring BP is important because high BP often has no symptoms. One way to improve BP is by tele-monitoring patients in the convenience of their homes. Interventions that use home BP tele-monitoring linked with patient feedback and medication titration can enhance access and improve outcomes for adults with HTN (Bosworth, 2011). (3) Education regarding lifestyle modification such as eating a healthy diet, maintaining a healthy weight, calculating and maintaining body mass index (BMI) within normal range, engaging in moderate physical activity, smoking cessation, limiting alcohol and medication adherence. (4) Preventing and managing diabetes. (5) Treating high BP with medications and stressing the importance of medication adherence (CDC, 2012). The principle goal of treating HTN is to reduce the sequelae associated with HTN and to prevent multiple system damage. Although the recommended intervention varies and is dependent on the patient’s age and severity of HTN, experts believe that innovative, tailored, culturally sensitive educational interventions via tele-monitoring are most effective in reducing high BP. Based on these recommendations, we propose a six-month tailored, culturally-sensitive educational intervention incorporating tele-monitoring by APNs employed by a private practice. The educational intervention will include diet management, engaging in moderate physical activity, weight control, medication adherence, and assessment of lifestyle changes (smoking cessation and limiting alcohol consumption) in comparison to standard educational intervention of blood pressure management by APNs. The proposed practice change delivered over a six-month time period will be guided by asking clinical questions in PICOT format [P: population of interest; I: intervention or issue of interest; C: comparison of interest; O: outcome expected; and T: time for the intervention to achieve the outcome] (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2011). The purpose of this EBPCP delivered by APNs is to provide adequate management of HTN resulting in decreased HTN among AA males aged 40 years and older. Based on these recommendations our PICOT question is: In hypertensive AA males aged > 40 years (P), what is the efficacy of a tailored, culturally-sensitive educational intervention via tele-monitoring by APNs employed by private practice (I) in comparison to standard educational intervention of blood pressure management by APNs (C) in reducing blood pressure readings within normal range of < 120/80 mmHg (O) over a six month period (T)? (see Appendix A). Planning the Practice Change TeamThere are several disciplines that must be included in planning this practice change. The APNs, physician, staff nurses, nursing assistants, billing and clerical staff all need to have input into the best way to integrate the proposed practice change into the patient’s plan of care. By including all levels of staff in the planning the best methods of implementing and monitoring alternate BP measurements can be determined. The key informants in implementing this practice change will include all levels of staff within the primary care practice. The APN’s salary which is approximately $92,000 per year will be prorated for one day/week to oversee the proposed practice change from the onset to conclusion, and to maintain the integrity of data collection and data analysis/interpretation. The APN and physician need to give guidance on clinically acceptable BP readings and pharmacological management of HTN. The staff nurses need to provide information on the techniques on BP monitoring as well as support staff teaching. Clerical staff and nursing assistants will play an important role by providing feedback regarding the charting system and the ease of being able to gather and provide information about BP readings from the patients to the APN. Finally, the billing staff needs to provide information about the proper billing for in office versus in home BP monitoring. The practice change team will work once per week to coordinate the change process. The setting for the proposed practice change will be a medium size solo family practice office in a moderate size city in the Midwest with a large or rapidly growing population of AAs. No participants from outside agencies will be involved in the implementation of this practice change. The monitoring of BP will be done by APNs. The practice staff will monitor all interventions. Critical Appraisal of EvidenceMultiple sources of evidence have contributed to the development of the proposed evidence based practice change. These sources include one Cochrane meta-analyses review and eleven randomized controlled trials. The collection of evidence was obtained following an extensive literature review using the following databases: Cochrane, CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. The literature search was derived from the following key words: "hypertension", "blood pressure", "usual care for hypertension" "tele-monitoring", "telemedicine", "nurse practitioner", "advanced practice nurse" and "African Americans". Articles were selected for utilization based upon their applicability to the reduction of HTN in AAs. Eighty articles were reviewed; however, a majority was eliminated because they were greater than 12 years old, the sample size was too small, they did not completely fit the aforementioned criteria for the proposed practice change or they were lower levels of evidence. The synthesis of evidence and strength of the evidence tables are provided in Appendix B and C. Jaana, Pare, and Sicotte (2007) conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of home blood pressure monitoring via tele-monitoring towards the reduction of HTN. Jaana, Pare and Sicottes (2007) findings indicated that the control of BP is better achieved when measured at home as opposed to in clinical settings. In addition to a reduction of HTN, the utilization of home BP monitoring was also shown to be beneficial in the identification of ‘White coat syndrome’. Identification of ‘White coat syndrome’ can prevent over treatment of patients with anti-hypertensive medications. Artinian, Washington, and Templin (2001) performed a randomized control trial (RCT) to determine if the addition of tele-monitoring to the 'usual care' for BP management would reduce BP more than in those who just receive the 'usual care'. Artinian (2001) concluded that patients’, who received tele-monitoring, in addition to the 'usual care', yielded the most significant reduction in BP over the course of the clinical trial. In 2007, Artinian, Flack, Nordstrom, Hockman, Washington, Jen, and Fathy built off the previously mentioned study, performing a RCT on AAs with HTN. This study was comparing patients who received 'usual care' to those patients who received tele-monitoring in addition to 'usual care' for BP management. Artinian et al. (2007) concluded that those patients who received the 'usual care' and tele-monitoring experienced a more significant decrease in BP than the control group. Continuing to evaluate 'usual care', McManus, Mant, Bray, Holder, Jones, Greenfield, Kaambwa, Bryan, Little, Williams, and Hobbs (2010) performed a RCT on 527, hypertensive adults in England. The study was comparing the 'usual care' provided by family physicians to patient self-management via tele-monitoring. The study concluded that over a monitoring period of one year, those who received the self-management intervention via tele-monitoring realized a greater reduction in BP when compared to those with 'usual care'. Parati, Omboni, Albini, Piantoni, Giuliano, Revera, Illyes, and Mancia (2009) performed a RCT to compare patients who received 'usual care' for HTN management to those patients who utilized tele-monitoring for HTN management. Parati et al. (2009) concluded that those individuals in which tele-monitoring were the main intervention experienced an overall greater reduction in HTN than those with 'usual care'. Brennan, Spettell, Villagra, Ofili, McMahill-Walraven, Lowy, Daniels, Quarshie and Mayberry (2010) performed a RCT on 954, hypertensive, AA males. This study compared the management of HTN by a telephonic nurse and in home BP monitoring against those with just in home BP monitoring. Brennan et al. (2010) concluded that patients who received telephonic nurse intervention combined with in home BP monitoring had a significant decrease in overall BP when compared to those that just had in home BP monitoring. Continuing to evaluate the effects of tele-monitoring in AAs, McCant, Mckoy, Grubber, Olsen, Oddone, Powers, and Bosworth (2009) performed a RCT to examine the feasibility of home tele-monitoring among primary care patients with poor BP control. Of the 588 participants, 147 patients were randomized to usual care. The remaining 441 patients were randomized to receive either (1) a nurse-administered, tailored behavioral intervention; (2) a nurse-administered medication management according to a hypertension decision support system; and (3) a combination of these two interventions. McCant et al. (2009) concluded that 75% of patients were able to use tele-monitoring devices appropriately. Bosworth, Powers, Olsen, McCant, Grubber, Smith, Gentry, Rose, Houtven, Wang, Goldstein, and Oddone (2011) performed a RCT that examined the effects of a patient behavioral management intervention, medication management, and a combination of the 2 interventions delivered by telephone and activated by home BP monitoring among adults with HTN treated in primary care. Bosworth et al. (2009) concluded that patients whose BP was poorly controlled at baseline, exhibited a significant reduction in BP with the combination of behavioral and medication management. Hacihasano?lu and G?züm, (2011) echoed similar findings when they performed a RCT on 120 hypertensive patients who residence was in Turkey. The study concluded that targeted education from nurses resulted in a significant decrease in BP when compared to those with usual care. Hill, Han, Dennison, Kim, Roary, Blumenthal, Bone, Levine and Post (2003) performed a RCT on 309 hypertensive AA men. This study compared the management of HTN by a team composed of a nurse practitioner, community health worker and physician, with that of traditional care found in the community. After 36 months of evaluation, Hill et al. concluded that intervention delivered by the team of healthcare providers was much more effective at lowering BP than the traditional care received. Allen, Dennison-Himmelfarb, Szanton, Bone, Hill, Levine, West, Barlow, Lewis-Boyer, Donnelly-Strozzo, Curtis, and Anderson’s (2011) RCT produced similar results. The study concluded that interventions delivered by a community health worker and nurse practitioner were more effective at recuing cardiovascular risk factors than 'usual care'. Of the 12 articles critiqued and later presented in the Evidence Rubric (see Appendix D), it can be concluded that there is strong evidence to support the utilization of advanced practice nurses and tele-monitoring to reduce HTN amongst African American men aged 40 years and older.Plan a Pilot Test for the ChangeAfter review of several theoretical frameworks, Rosswurm and Larrabee’s framework was chosen to guide the EBP proposal. The framework involves six steps: (1) assessing the need for change, (2) locating evidence, (3) analyzing the evidence, (4) designing a practice change, (5) implementing the practice change, and (6) maintaining the change (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2011). This model was selected because it is simple, easy to understand, and comprise steps that suitably fit this research project.The specific aim of the EBPCP is to implement a tailored, culturally-sensitive educational intervention incorporating BP management via tele-monitoring by APNs employed by the private practice. The educational intervention also includes diet management, increasing physical activity, weight control, medication adherence, and assessment of lifestyle changes that will offer adequate control of HTN among AA males aged 40 years and older. The setting for the proposed EBPCP will be an inner-city medium size solo family practice office in a moderate size city in the Midwest. The practice is run by one physician and two APNs. The practice is surrounded by small business complexes with convenience parking accessible to main roads and interstate highways. Nearby residential areas are within a quarter mile of the family practice office in all directions. The nearest healthcare facilities, including a moderate hospital, dentist office and moderate nursing home are within two miles along the main road on either direction. The practice site serves between 6,000 and 8,000 visits per year of 90% indigent AA patients ranging from minor seasonal flu complaints and allergies to severe and life-threatening events from chronic disease complications requiring referrals to hospitals, management of acute and minor illnesses in adults aged18 years and older.The EBPCP has been endorsed by the owner of the practice (physician) and his associates (APNs) because the EBPCP will augment current health care of this vulnerable population. The only resistance may come from nursing staff because the EBPCP may add more responsibilities to the routine activities. However, after the introduction of the benefits of the EBPCP and addressing the questions and concerns of nursing staff, it is anticipated that the EBPCP will gain support because it will help nurses to provide evidence based practice improvements in outcomes of AAs with HTN. Population/Sample Last year’s patient population at this practice was reported to be 7,058 visits; 89% (6,300) were AAs. This estimates to about 117 AAs seen per week at this practice for health care services or about 19 AAs per day with the exception of Sunday when the practice is closed. Of the 6,300 visits, half were AA males ages 40 years and older. Considering such a high percentage of AA patients seen in this practice on a daily basis it will be reasonable to suggest that the EBPCP team should be able to recruit 60 AA males with HTN into the EBPCP during the 6-months data collection period. Sampling plan The purposed population for the EBPCP is AA males with medical diagnosis of HTN receiving routine and follow-up care for management of HTN at the family practice office (eligibility criteria). Their care at the practice creates the target population from which the sample will be drawn. The sample will include AA males ages 40 years and older who meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) have a systolic blood pressure reading > 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure reading > 90 mmHg on two separate occurrences and who are taking or not taking anti-hypertensive medications or (2) systolic blood pressure > 130 mm Hg systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure > 80 mm Hg for potential candidate with diabetes or chronic kidney disease; and (3) able to read and speak English. Exclusion criteria include: (1) age less than 40 years; (2) females; (3) inability to read and speak English; (4) non- AAs; and (5) children. Purposive sampling will target all available AA males who will meet the above inclusion criteria. The total number of subjects in the study is 50. Over sampling will occur by 20% to account for attrition (N=60).Recruitment procedures A member of the EBPCP team will meet face to face at a convenient time with all six RNs who are practicing at the family practice office and inform them of the proposed EBPCP. They will be instructed to invite potential candidates into the study and explain eligibility and exclusion criteria and address all of their questions and concerns before proceeding with the proposed practice change. Non- RNs will be informed to post the EBPCP on the information board and to notify RNs of potential candidates. The RN will be instructed to initiate the study purpose, and invite eligible patients into the study prior to or following the initial health assessment by the physician or APNs taking into consideration the urgency of the purpose of the visit and the present conditions of the candidate. AA males ages 40 years and older who meet inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in the EBPCP by APNs to improve outcomes associated with HTN in AA males ages 40 years and older.The APN will obtain the patient’s written signature on the Informed Consent (IC) on WSU letterhead from willing participants after explanation about benefits versus risks of EBPCP. The participants will also be informed that there will be no penalty or coercion for refusing to participate in the EBPCP. The APN will provide explanation regarding BP and weight assessment using anthropometric measures and about the types of questions that the candidates will answer and how long it will take to complete the questionnaire(s). In addition, the APN will assess for questions or concerns from the participants. The original copy of the IC will be given to the patient and a copy will be kept in a locked files cabinet for a member of the EBPCP to collect once a week. Patients will be given a $15 gift card to Wal*mart’s store for participation in the questionnaire (and or intervention) initially and a $20 bi-monthly for a total of the $75 at the end of the EBPCP. Recruitment into the EBPCP will continue until the desired number of participants has been recruited into the EBPCP. A member of EBPCP will have a contact number to be reached at all time for questions and concerns by the APNs and/or the practice administration.The EBPCP will consist of a tailored, culturally sensitive education intervention incorporating tele-monitoring by APNs employed by the private practice. The educational intervention will include diet management, physical activity, weight control, medication adherence, and assessment of lifestyle changes. The intervention will be measured using various instruments, including BP and weight via anthropometric measures, exercise pattern (Lorig et al., 1996), diet type and frequency (ordinal scale), medication adherence (Morisky’s scale), and smoking and alcohol consumption (self-reported on a nominal scale), the later scale’s content validity was 0.86 and inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.89 to 1[kappa statistics] and 0.78-0.96[Spearman Rho correlation]. Only the overall content validity and reliability of the questionnaire was reported by the author in the literature. Individual scale validity and reliability of the exercise scale and medication adherence scale was not reported in the literature. In addition, we plan to use a questionnaire developed by the team incorporating three open ended questions about the participants’ satisfaction with the educational intervention. Resistance might come from the staff because the EBPCP may incorporate new protocol and development of new policies regarding the management or education of AA males with HTN. The purposed changes may create stress and provoke resistance to APNs because of additional work responsibilities in managing patients. With the help of the physician and APNs changes can be made incrementally and adequate education about linkage of the benefits of the EBPCP resulting in better patients’ outcomes. Implementation of the change may require special accommodations such as extra time for collecting data and educating patients. It is also paramount to consider additional time commitment for the patients when participating in the proposed educational practice change. Special accommodations and flexibility to meet their needs is crucial to acknowledge their commitment to the EBPCP.The proposed practice change will occur incrementally during a six-month time period. Please refer to the Gantt chart for the proposed timeline (Appendix D). During the first month, permission will be obtained from the practice administration to conduct the EBPCP. Stakeholders will get involved with the introduction of PICOT question. Identification of supporters and laggards will be determined. Education about the benefits of EBPCP will be provided to the staff and their concerns will be addressed by a member of the EBPCP. The EBPCP will also be introduced to the APNs during a scheduled team meeting to seek their support for this practice change and to determine if they have concerns about the feasibility of carrying out this practice change. An open-ended interview guide will be developed by the team to determine patient satisfaction with the proposed educational intervention. (See appendix for questions). Assessment of the practice will be conducted to develop an appropriate strategy for the change. The budget will be determined and funds allocated (see Appendix E). Patients who have met the inclusion criteria and who are interested in the educational intervention will be phased in to the EBPCP during the second through fifth month. During this time period, the APNs will determine data from the patient’s chart to be transferred to a spreadsheet corresponding to all variables to be measured in the patients for statistical analyses. A formative evaluation will be done to determine the progress of the EBPCP and adjustments will be made depending on the results. During the sixth month of the EBPCP, summative evaluation will be conducted and data will be analyzed to determine the results of the EBPCP.Successful strategies that will help persuade others to support arguments behind the EBPCP will include providing opportunity to discuss others concerns, addressing their questions and continuously providing accurate information about the benefit of EBP. Communicating with the FNPs periodically will be helpful in determining any identified problems in implementing the EBPCP and if so the recommendations they have to improve or halt any lack of success in carrying this out. Providing education to all stakeholders about EBP and following a SWOT analysis process by identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities for success and delineating the threats or barriers with strategies to overcome them will be beneficial in making this EBPCP a success. This strategic plan will help to share the vision of the EBPCP, to overcome barriers, to promote engagement of staff and key stakeholders, and to establish incremental goals for all people involved. EvaluationThe outcomes that will be measured in this EBPCP are blood pressure, self-reported exercise pattern, weight, self-reported diet, frequency and portion control, medication adherence, self-reported cigarette and alcohol use, and patient satisfaction. All of these outcomes will be measured at baseline, and again at one month, three months and six months from the commencement of the educational intervention. The outcomes will be measured using various instruments, including blood pressure and weight via anthropometric measures, exercise pattern (Lorig et al., 1996), self-reported diet type and frequency (ordinal scale), medication adherence (Morisky’s scale), and smoking and alcohol consumption (nominal scale). The latter scale’s content validity was 0.86 and inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.89 to 1 [kappa statistics] & 0.78-0.96 [Spearman Rho correlation]. Only the overall content validity and reliability of the questionnaire was reported by the author in the literature. Individual scale validity and reliability of the exercise scale and medication adherence scale was not reported in the literature. In addition, we plan to use the three-item open-ended interview guide developed by the team to ascertain the participants’ satisfaction with the educational intervention. The primary outcome of the study will be BP control measured at baseline, one month, three months, and six months using a standardized research protocol. At each measurement point, the APN will ask the patients to rest for 5 minutes before obtaining 2 BP measurements using a digital sphygmomanometer. The participant will be weighed using a digital weighing scale. During the same visit, participants will be asked to complete a structured 24-item questionnaire comprising four sections- demographic profile, lifestyle behavior (smoking, drinking, exercise, and dietary habits), self-health monitoring practices and medication adherence. Demographic profile will include age, gender, educational status, marital status, insurance, and total household income. Lifestyle behaviors- This section of the questionnaire will include self-reported questions to determine cigarette and alcohol consumption on a nominal scale. Exercise scale modified from Lorig et al. (1996), will be used to assess exercise pattern. Participants will be asked to indicate the type and frequency of physical activities on an ordinal scale. Dietary intake will be assessed by asking the type, portion size and frequency of food on an ordinal scale. Self-health-monitoring practice- assessment will ascertain whether the participants had performed regular self-health checking via tele-monitoring on BP and maintained records. The measurement scale will be dichotomous. Medication adherence will be assessed using Morisky’s (1986) scale composed of 4 dichotomous questions about medication use patterns. The scale is quick and simple to use for subjects to indicate their adherence to the physician’s instructions. A summative score will be calculated to reflect the level of medication compliance. A low score indicates high medication adherence. Data will be collected using the above mentioned questionnaire by the APNs in the out-patient solo family practice. Eligible patients will be invited to participate in the educational intervention. Following the invitation, eligible patients will be asked to complete the questionnaires which can be completed in 25 minutes. Privacy will be provided in a quiet area of the private practice office during the completion of the questionnaire. All questions will be answered by the APN. The APN will also weigh the participant on a digital weighing scale and record the weight. Donabedien’s (1982) program evaluation framework will guide this six-month educational intervention. The framework includes four elements: structure, process, outcome and impact. Structure includes the social and physical resources in place to support the proposal EBPCP. Process incorporates what will occur during the EBPCP. Outcomes include the early expectations after the practice change; whereas impact refers to the long term effects of the practice change measured against the “gold standards” such as clinical practice standards developed by the American Heart Association in year 2012.For the purpose of this EBPCP, we plan to incorporate the outcome during the six-month educational intervention. As a result of this practice change, positive outcomes will be measured and achieved by assessment of the following: Decrease of blood pressure to within normal range <120/80 mmHg; patients will report better lifestyle choices through selection of adherence to DASH, increase in physical activity, weight control, medication adherence, and lifestyle changes (smoking cessation and limited alcohol consumption) and an increase in patient satisfaction. The Donabedien’s program evaluation framework was chosen because it is simple and easy to understand and it includes the outcome element among its evaluation strategy which is the main focus of this EBPCP. The practice change will be monitored by ascertaining changes in blood pressure, self-reported changes in adherence to DASH diet, increase in physical activity, weight control via anthropometric measures, medication adherence, lifestyle changes (smoking cessation and limited alcohol consumption) incrementally and over the six-month educational intervention. Creating small successes along the way will help in implementing the change. For example, during the six-month time period, we will ask the patient how they are managing behavioral lifestyles as measured by the stated measures. The long term effects of the practice change will be monitored by quarterly audits of charts to evaluate the variables of interest. When patients come back for regular follow up care BP readings within normal range of 120/80 mmHg will indicate that the practice change was successful in maintaining long-term effects. Patients who are unsuccessful in maintaining the practice change can be reeducated and empowered. Every six months the APNs will make phone calls to the patients and enquire regarding their health status This will help nourish the new culture to make the change last. Success of the practice change project will be determined by the team’s observation of changes in the patient’s BP measurement and self-reported changes in adherence to the DASH diet, increase in physical activity, weight loss, smoking cessation, decreased alcohol consumption, and an increase in patient satisfaction. This study will use non-parametric statistics (mean, median, mode, range, standard deviation, %, and frequency) to measure its variables, and parametric statistics- analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to measure four dependent variables including a decrease in SBP & DBP, adherence to DASH, increase in physical activity, and a decrease in weight. Data entry and interpretation will be done by WSU Statistical Consultant Center in consultation with the researcher. Human SubjectsEducational interventions will be screened by Expedited IRB at WSU. However, the Review Board or Screening Committee at the family practice office will review the EBPCP and guarantee permission prior to implementation of the proposed educational practice change with the goal of providing adequate management of HTN among AA males aged 40 years and older. The proposed practice change will consist of an educational component as reported in the literature to improve health outcomes associated with HTN among AA males aged 40 years and older by the APNs following instructions given by the EBPCP team. The data collected will be kept in the small locked file cabinet located in the practice’s office, only accessible to the EBPCP team members and the APNs involved for statistical analyses. Confidentiality and anonymity will be kept as established by the practice and by the research protocol if any publication of results will be done to disseminate information.BudgetFunding will be received from the American Heart Association National Clinical Research Program. This grant offers $77,000 for two years to practitioners offering clinical studies that will promote cardiovascular health. This amount will be used for equipment and additional staffing to support the increased level of blood pressure monitoring. The APNs salary which is approximately $92,000 per year will be prorated for one day/week which is approximately $9,200 over a period of six months. The budget will be split in the following manner: 50% will go to additional staffing and APNs salary, 25% to purchasing equipment and updating the practice computer system to work with the tele-monitoring system, 15% to additional supplies needed to be able to take appropriate blood pressure measurements and 10% for travel to patients homes for set up of the tele-monitoring system and patient education. This is shown as a pie chart in Appendix F.The cost of implementing this practice change will be higher in the first year due to the technology updates that will be required. This cost will decrease with time. The cost will be justified if the intended results of normal blood pressure for the patients of the practice and if the sequelae associated with high blood pressure are reduced. ConclusionOverall the implementation of the EBPCP by APNs will be beneficial to the practice given the strength of the evidence obtained from the various research studies on the benefits of tele-monitoring as successful patient-management approach. Improving the rate of blood pressure control for the AA male population aged > 40 years will help in preventing the sequelae associated with HTN and improve quality of life. Tele-monitoring may improve the quality of decision making and provide the ongoing surveillance required for timely interventions for BP control, although it may be more resource intensive than traditional clinic visits. ReferencesAllen, J.K., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C.R., Szanton, S.L., Bone, L., Hill, M.N., Levine, D.M., West, M., Barlow,A., Lewis-Boyer, L. Donnelly-Strozzo, M., Curtis, C., & Anderson, K. (2011). Community Outreach and Cardiovascular Health (COACH) Trial: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Nurse Practitioner/Community Health Worker Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction in Urban Community Health Centers. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, 4(6), 595-602. American Heart Association. (2012). Understanding blood pressure readings. Retrieved March 5, 2012, from HYPERLINK "" NT, Flack JM, Nordstrom CK, Hockman EM, Washington OGM, Jen KC, & Fathy M. (2007). Effects of nurse-managed telemonitoring on blood pressure at 12- month follow-up among urban African Americans. Nursing Research, 56(5), 312-322. doi:10.1097/01.NNR.0000289501.45284.6eArtinian, N., Washington, O., and Templin, T., (2001). Effects of home tele-monitoring (TM) and community-based monitoring on blood pressure control in urban African Americans: A pilot study. Heart and Lung Journal, 30(3), 191-199.Bosworth, H. B., Powers, B. J., Olsen, M. K., McCant, F., Grubber, J., Smith, V., Gentry, P. W., Rose, C., Houtven, C. V., Wang, V., Goldstein, M.K., & Oddone, E. Z. (2011). Home blood pressure management and improved blood pressure control. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(13), 1173-1180.Brennan, T., Spettell, C., Villagra, V., Ofili, E., McMahill-Walraven, C., Lowy, E. … Mayberry, R. (2010). Disease management to promote blood pressure control among African Americans. Population Health Management Journal, 13(2), 65-72. doi: 10.1089/pop.2009.0019Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of high blood pressure. Retrieved from for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). About the National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved March 5, 2012 from , R., & G?züm, S. (2011). The effect of patient education and home monitoring on medication compliance, hypertension management, healthy lifestyle behaviors and BMI in a primary health care setting. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(5/6), 692-705.Hill, M. (2003). Hypertension care and control in underserved urban African American men: behavioral and psychological outcomes at 36 months. American Journal of Hypertension 16, 906-913. doi:10.1016/S0895-7061(03)01034-3Institute of Medicine. (2010). A Population-Based Policy and Systems Change Approach to Prevent and Control Hypertension. Retrieved January 25, 2012 from , M., Pare, G., & Sicotte, C. (2007). Hypertension home telemonitoring: Current evidence and recommendations for future studies. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 15 (1), 19-31.McCant, F., Mckoy, G., Grubber, J., Olsen, M. K., Oddone, E., Powers, B., & Bosworth, H. B. (2009). Feasibility of blood pressure telemonitoring in patients with poor blood pressure control. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 15, 282-285.McManus RJ, Mant J, Bray EP, Holder R, Jones MI, Greenfield S, Kaambwa B, Bryan S, Little P, Williams B, & Hobbs FD. (2010). Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 376(9736), 163-172. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60964-6Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Williams.National Institutes of Health. (2012). Hypertension. Retrieved March 29, 2012 from G, Omboni S, Albini F, Piantoni L, Giuliano A, Revera M, Illyes M, & Mancia G. (2009). Home blood pressure telemonitoring improves hypertension control in general practice. The Tele-BP Care study. Journal of Hypertension, 27(1), 198-203. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283163cafSchwarz, K., Mion, L., Hudock, D., & Litman, G. (2008). Telemonitoring of heart failure patients and their caregivers: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 23(1), 18-26. United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2012). Healthy People 2020. Retrieved from Health Organization. (2011). Hypertension: Fact sheet. Retrieved January 19, 2012 from ATable 1 PICOT TABLEProblem Affecting the Patient/PopulationInterventionComparisonOutcomeTimeHypertension is a medical condition that is highly prevalent among African-Americans (AA) males, ages 40 years and older compared to other minority population groups or Whites of similar ages in the United States.A tailored, culturally-sensitive educational intervention incorporating blood pressure management via tele-monitoring by Advance Practice Nurses (APN’s) including*Diet management (DASH)*Increasing Physical activity*Weight control *Medication adherence*Lifestyle changes.Measurement/Instrumentation*Blood pressure & weight via anthropometric measures*Exercise pattern-Lorig et al (1996)*Diet: portion control, type & frequency- ordinal scale*Medication adherence- Morisky’s scale*Cigarette & alcohol use: self-reported on a nominal scaleValidity: Examined by three experts; overall content validity was 0.86Reliability: The inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.89 to 1 (kappa statistics) &0.78-0.96 (Spearman Rho correlation).Only the overall content validity and reliability of the questionnaire was reported by the author in the literature. Individual validity and reliability of the exercise scale and medication adherence scale was not reported in the literature.Standard educational intervention of blood pressure measurement by APNs.Blood pressure readings within normal range of < 120/80 mmHg (considered normal range according to the most recent guidelines from the American Heart Association, 2011). Over a six month period in monthly visits. PICOT question: In hypertensive African-American males aged > 40 years (P), what is the efficacy of a tailored, culturally-sensitive educational intervention via tele-monitoring by APNs (I) in comparison to standard educational intervention of blood pressure management by APNs (C) in reducing blood pressure readings within normal range of less than 120/80 mm Hg (O), over a six month period (T) ?Appendix BTable 1 – Evaluation Table of the Level of EvidenceCitation & study #Design/methodi.e., meta-analyses or meta-synthesis from Cochrane databaseSample/Setting Major variables studiedMeasurement or instruments, i.e., observation or psychometric tools or scalesData analysis, i.e., Confidence interval = briefly discuss)Researchers or authors’ expected or anticipated outcomes, Findings or resultsAppraisal Worth to practiceS=strengths versus W=weaknesses or L=limitations of the study 1. Jaana, M., Pare, G., & Sicotte, C. (2007). Hypertension home telemonitoring: Current evidence and recommendations for future studies. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 15 (1), 19-31.Meta-analysis from Cochrane database14 studies investigating the use of home BP telemonitoring that were found in the scientific literature of which only three were randomized trials. The studies present evidence on the benefits of telemonitoring as a patient-management approach and their condition such as significant BP control, better medication adherence, changes in patients’ lifestyle as well as their attitudes and behaviors. Comparing results of all the 14 studies.The findings of all the 14 studies were analyzed and compared.Home telemonitoring to support hypertension control by allowing fast interventions and adjustments in both treatment and medications, improving patients’ compliance and communication with their practitioners as well as reduce the ‘white coat’ effect. (White coat effect-is defined as reproducible hypertension in the medical setting and normotension in the non-medical setting).A meta-analysis on the monitoring of BP indicates that the control of BP is better achieved when measured at home as opposed to in clinical settings especially in cases of low medication compliance, co morbidities, and uncontrolled hypertension. The electronic transmission of data from home BP monitoring allowed regular communication with healthcare providers and supports reliable readings that are otherwise not evident in clinical settings. Strengths: Telemonitoring of patients with HTN appears to be an effective patient-management approach that supports BP control, assists in identifying patients with the white coat effect and as such reduces the risk of over-treatment. HTN telemonitoring supports patients’ empowerment and reassurance by giving them direct responsibility for continuous monitoring of the BP and by ensuring regular communication with health care providers and immediate feedback, even outside office hours and in remote areas. Weaknesses: The issue of reimbursement for the home monitoring devices and services that are provided remains critical when introducing and advocating telemonitoring as a patient-management approach. The problem of decrease in compliance represents an important aspect that needs further exploration..It is critical to understand that home telemonitoring does not necessarily work equally among all patients. Limitations: Based on this review, the heterogeneity of the studies found in the literature makes the comparison and aggregation of findings difficult. Over all most of the studies were conducted over a short period of time and involved small samples of patients which limits the generalizability of the findings especially in relation to the sustainability and effectiveness of home telemonitoring as a patient-monitoring approach. 2. McCant, F., Mckoy, G., Grubber, J., Olsen, M. K., Oddone, E., Powers, B., & Bosworth, H. B. (2009). Feasibility of blood pressure telemonitoring in patients with poor blood pressure control. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 15, 282-285.Randomized control trial (RCT). A total of 588 veterans with a diagnosis of hypertension from the Durham VA Medical Center. 147 patients were randomized into the usual care arm; 441 were randomized to receive one of three interventions that included home BP telemonitoring:The intervention arms were: (1) a nurse-administered, tailored behavioral intervention; (2) a nurse-administered medication management according to a hypertension decision support system; (3) a combination of 1&2 (4) usual care. The feasibility of using home blood telemonitoring among primary care patients with poor BP control.A research assistant trained patients in the use of the telemonitoring equipment and gave instructions to take three BP readings a week, on different days. The BP monitor (A&D 767PC, CareMatrix Inc) was used to transmit data via a wireless link to a home telephone line. The data were divided according to the number of alerts: 0-2 vs. > 2. The percentage of intervention subjects with 0-2 vs. >2 technical alerts for baseline demographic characteristics was calculated. Means and SDs were calculated for continuous variables of interest. Differences in baseline characteristics between intervention subjects were calculated using a two-tailed chi-square test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Race and employment status were divided into 2 level variables (Caucasian vs non-Caucasian; retired vs. not retired) for the chi-square tests. The researchers expected that patients would be able to use BP telemonitoring devices successfully and thereby improve BP control, decrease medication use and overall cost in comparison to using clinic measurements. During the first six months of experience in using the BP monitoring equipment 693 technical alerts were generated by 267 patients. About half of these patients (112) generated more than two technical alerts. Resolution of the alerts showed that 61% were caused by patient non-adherence. Patient who generated >2 technical alerts were younger (61 vs. 64 years; p=0.001) and were more likely to be non-Caucasian (64% vs. 47%, p=0.002) than those generating 2 or fewer alerts. Strengths: The study was successful in getting 75% of the patients to use the devices correctly. Weaknesses: Certain patients will require more support to use the equipment successfully. For some patients this technology may not be appropriate or is problematic; patients may be either non-adherent or unable to fulfill the intervention protocol. The study team should be prepared for changes in the telephone system and device infrastructure, and have alternative data collection methods available. The increased time and attention required by the non-adherent patients or those unable to manage the technology may have significant cost implications. Limitations: The study participants came from a pool of veterans who received their primary health care through the Durham VA primary care clinics.3. Bosworth, H. B., Powers, B. J., Olsen, M. K., McCant, F., Grubber, J., Smith, V., Gentry, P. W., Rose, C., Houtven, C. V., Wang, V., Goldstein, M.K., & Oddone, E. Z. (2011). Home blood pressure management and improved blood pressure control. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(13), 1173-1180.Randomized control trial (RCT)591 individuals were randomized to either usual care or 1 of 3 telephone-based intervention groups. (1) nurse-administered behavioral management (2) nurse-and physician-administered medication management, or (3) a combination of both (4) usual care. 49% were African American. The study was conducted at the primary care clinics at a Veteran Affairs Medical Center Interventions that use home BP telemonitoring linked with patient feedback and medication titration may enhance access and improve outcomes for adults with hypertension. The primary outcome of the study was BP control measured at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months using a standardized research protocol. At each measurement point, a research assistant masked to intervention arms asked patients to rest for 5 minutes before obtaining 2 BP measurements using a digital sphygmomanometer. For the primary analysis, a logistic mixed-effects regression model was used to estimate differences in BP control at each post baseline time point for each of the intervention groups relative to usual care. Marginalized estimates and corresponding confidence intervals for the proportion in BP control for the usual care and each intervention group at 6, 12, and 18 months were calculated to estimate the relative improvement in proportion of patients with BP control. For secondary analyses, the intervention group effects on mean systolic and diastolic BPs over time were examined. Longitudinal data analysis models with an unstructured covariance was utilized to account for the correlation of patients’ repeated measurements over time. Mean differences between each intervention group and the usual care group at 6,12, and 18 months were calculated, along with corresponding 95% CI, using SAS ESTIMATE statements. Home BP telemonitoring may improve the quality of decision making and provide the ongoing surveillance required for timely interventions for poor BP control. Of the 591 study patients, 48% were AA, 92% were male, and 59% of participants had their BP under control at baseline using standardized measurements. Both the behavioral management and medication management alone showed significant improvement at 12 months-12.8% (95% CI, 1.6%-24.1%) and 12.5% (95% CI, 1.3-23.6%), respectively-but not at 18 months. In subgroups analyses, among those with poor baseline BP control, systolic BP decreased in the combined intervention group by 14.8mmHg (95% CI, -21.8 to-7.8mmHg) at 12 months and 8.0 mmHg (95% CI, -15.5 to -0.5 mmHg) at 18 months, relative to usual care. Strengths: Among those individuals with poor baseline BP control, the combined intervention significantly decreased systolic BP and diastolic BP at 12 and 18 months. Weaknesses: The cost of the interventions alone was approximately $ 1100 per patient over 18 months. Each intervention demonstrated improvements in BP control or systolic BP at 12 months; none of these improvements were sustained at 18 months and did not result in lower medical care costs. Limitations: The fact that the study participant’s blood pressures were lower than anticipated at baseline may have hampered the ability to detect larger improvements in the BP control in the overall analyses. 4. Artinian, N., Washington, O., and Templin, T., (2001). Effects of home tele-monitoring (TM) and community-based monitoring on blood pressure control in urban African Americans: A pilot study. Heart and Lung Journal, 30(3), 191-9.Randomized Control Trial (RCT) Subject were recruited from a family community center on the east side of Detroit. The sample contained 26 African Americans with a mean age of 59 years.This pilot study compared 2 experimental interventions- home TM plus usual care or community – based monitoring plus usual care-with usual care only.Participants had their BP measured and completed an investigator-developed demographic profile and HTN history form.BPs were measured by using an electronic BP monitor (model A &D UA 767PC) that has been validated and is accurate to within ±3 mm Hg or 5% and falls within the Advancement of Medical Instrument standards.Both experimental groups yield positive results with SBP and DBP dropped significantly during the 3-months intervention period (p=.03;p=.04 respectively). In home TM group the decrease in SBP/DBP was 148.8+/- 13.8mm Hg/90.2+/- 5.79 mm Hg at baseline to the 3-months’ follow up level of 124.1+/-13.82mm Hg/75.58+/- 11.4. In the community-based monitoring group SBP dropped from baseline level of 155.25+/-17.014mm Hg to 142.3+/-12.1 and DBP dropped from 89.42+/-10.95 to 78.25+/-6.86. In the usual care group, BPs were unchanged with Large effect sizes were found (f=0.59 and 0.53) for SBP and DBP respectively. Despite the small sample size, the results indicated that participants in the home TM and community-based monitoring groups had clinically and statistically significant reductions in both SBP and DBP during the 3 month monitoring period compared to the participants in the usual care group.The purpose of this pilot study was to test the following hypothesis: Persons who participate in nurse-managed home TM plus usual care or who participate in nurse-managed community-based monitoring (CBM) plus usual care will have greater improvement in blood pressure from baseline to 3 months' follow-up than will persons who receive usual care only.Both the HT group and the CBM group had clinically and statistically significant (P <.05) drops in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at 3 months' follow-up, with participants in the HT group demonstrating the greatest improvement (HT: baseline SBP 148.8 +/- 13.8, DBP 90.2 +/- 5.79; 3 months' follow-up SBP 124.1 +/- 13.82, DBP 75.58 +/- 11.4; CBM: baseline SBP 155.25 +/- 17.014, DBP 89.42 +/- 10.95; 3 months' follow-up SBP 142.3 +/- 12.1, DBP 78.25 +/- 6.86). There was little change in SBP or DBP at 3 months' follow-up in the usual care only group. CONCLUSION: These are important pilot results, which if replicated in a larger sample will significantly improve care for urban African Americans with hypertension.Strengths: the study determined that the cost of TM is about $1.50 per day, which includes the cost of all equipment, shipping the monitor directly to the person’s home, telephone training, and unlimited toll-free tele-transmission of the data. If BP control can be achieved in a person with HTN and diabetes, the incidence of extremely costly sequelae such as end-stage renal disease and heart failure can be reduced. It is likely that the reduction in end-organ damage will far outweigh the cost of TM, but testing of this assumption is required. In addition, TM has the ability to identify patients with white-coat HTN, thereby avoiding excess treatment.Weaknesses: Although we know that there may be advantages to home BP TM, there is a need for more research because we do not know the effects of this strategy on long-term control of BP. The next phase of research needs to monitor the effects of the intervention for a longer period and allow for a gradual reduction in the intensity of the intervention. It is important to determine how much the intervention helped participants make BP monitoring and lifestyle modification a routine part of their daily lives.Limitations: alternative community- based approaches to monitoring BP hold promise as a means of facilitating access to care and obtaining control of HTN. More research is needed.5. Brennan , T., Spettell, C., Villagra, V., Ofili,E., McMahill-Walraven, C., J. Lowy, E., … Mayberry, R. (2010). Disease management to promote blood pressure control among African Americans. Population Health Management Journal, 13(2), 65-72. Randomized Control Trial (RCT)A prospective randomized controlled study (March 2006—December 2007) was conducted, with 12 months of follow-up on each subject. A total of 5932 health plan members were randomly selected from the population ofself-identified African Americans, age 23 and older, in health maintenance organization plans, with hypertension;954 accepted, 638 completed initial assessment, and 485 completed follow-up assessment.1. BP. The main dependent variable was the proportion of subjects in each group with BP<120=80, the optimal levelrecommended by JNC 7 and ISHIB hypertension managementguidelines.Frequency of BP Monitoring. The frequency of BP monitoringwas collected at initial and final assessments2. Frequency of BP Monitoring. The frequency of BP monitoring was collected at initial and final assessments.3. Number of anti-hypertension medication classes.4. Health care utilization. Health care utilization. 1.Two BP measurements were requested from the participant at the start and end of the initial assessment telephone call and the final assessment call. The lowest systolic and diastolic readings reported during a call were used in the analyses consistent with Healthcare EffectivenessData and Information Set (HEDIS_) guidelines for multiple BP measurements on a single visit.2. Using the following question: ‘‘About how often do you or your family member or friend take your blood pressure?’’ The frequency of BP monitoring categories were collapsed into‘‘weekly or more’’ and ‘‘less than weekly’’ monitoring.3. The proportion of members taking 2 or more anti- hypertension medication classes was measured in 2 ways. First, information was collected from the participant during the initial and post-telephonic assessments using a questionnaire. The second method used pharmacy claims for participants who were with the health plan’s pharmacy plan during the study period.4. Health care utilization data were obtained from the health plan’s claims system.After adjusting for differences between the groups at time of initial assessment, the intervention group was 46% more likely to report monitoring BP at least weekly in comparison to the control group (odds ratio [OR] 1.46,95% confidence Interval [CI] 1.07-2.00, P=0.02). The intervention group was 50% more likely to have BP in compliance at final assessment than the control group (OR= 1.50, 95% CI 0.997-2.27, P=0.052), and showed improvement in BP readings that approached the level of statistical significance established for the study.It was hypothesized that a greater proportion of interventiongroup participants would have BP<120=80 thancontrol group participants at the end of the 12-month study.It was also hypothesized that intervention group participantswould have lower mean systolic and diastolic pressures,would monitor their BP more frequently, and would be morelikely to use 2 or more antihypertensive medications thancontrol group participants.This study demonstrated that home BP monitoring, coupledwith a DM program that employs nurses who receivedcultural competence training as well as culturally sensitivematerials, can improve BP compliance and reduce systolic BP more than a home BP monitoring device alone. While a 3.1-point decrease in systolic BP may seem small, the ALLHATstudy estimated that a 3-point change in systolic BP could explain a 10%–20% difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events. While mean systolic and diastolic BPs were lower for bothgroups compared to initial assessment, the systolic BP adjustedmean of the intervention group was significantlylower than that of the control group (123.6 vs. 126.7, P?0.03)post interventionStrengths: The success of the currentprogram likely lies in the combination of BP monitoring in the home and a thoughtful, culturally sensitive DM program. The improvement in BP control should be generalizable to African American members with health insurance who will participate or interact with their health plan’s DM program.Weaknesses: With the greater prevalence of both hypertension and uncontrolled HTN in the AA community, and with effective hypertension treatments available, it is imperative that the health care community identify effective methods to engage AAs in programs to improve their hypertension control. More participants were needed. Limitations: Limitations of this randomized clinical trial include the potential for self-selection bias among participants, as evidenced by a low recruitment rate compared to the number of invited individuals. This underscores a common problem with large- scale DM programs and is not unique to this study.6. Hill M. (2003). Hypertension care and control in underserved urban African American men: behavioral and psychological outcomes at 36 months. American Journal of Hypertension 16, 906-913. Randomized Control Trial (RCT)The study population included 309 hypertension AAs men between the ages of 21 and 54 years and residing in inner city Baltimore. The study evaluated the effectiveness of a more intensive comprehensive educational-behavioral-pharmacologic intervention by a nurse practitioner-community health worker-physician (NP/CHW/MD) team and a less intensive education and referral intervention in controlling blood pressure (BP) and minimizing progression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and renal insufficiency. Changes in BP, left ventricular mass (LVM), and serum creatinine from baseline to 36 months were compared between groups.TrainedOPD-GCRC personnel blinded to group assignment obtained three BP measurements at 1-min intervals with aHawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.A trained sonographer performed transthoracic echocardiography.The two-dimensional 5/6 area–length method was usedbecause of its potential for generating greater accuracy andreproducibility than M-mode methods.Serum creatinine, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol(in milligrams per deciliter) were measured by standardprocedures through Quest Laboratories.Diabetes wasdefined as physician diagnosis of diabetes or serum glucose _200 mg/dL.Illicit drug use was determined byurine drug screen. The staff interviewed participants aboutsocio-demographic and behavioral risk factors, using itemsfrom the National Health Interview Survey and Hill-BoneCompliance Scale. Health care utilization was assessed by asking participants whether they currently had ahealth care provider for HTN and whether they were onantihypertensive medications.The only confidence interval (CI) reported was in the change in creatinine serum. The relative hazard ratio associated with assignment to more intensive versus less intensive was 0.63 (hazard ratio 95% CI=0.36-1.11, p=.11). This randomized clinical trial compared the effect of a lessintensive intervention to a more intensive intervention to improve HTN in AAs. At 36 months, the mean SBP/DBP change from baseline was -7.5/-10.1 mm Hg for less intensive group (p=.001 and .005 for between-group differences in SBP and DBP, respectively). The proportion of men with controlled BP (< 140/90 mm Hg) was 44% in the more intensive group and 31% in the less intensive group (p=.045). The LVM was significantly lower in the more intensive group than in the less intensive group (more intensive, 274 g; less intensive, 311 g; p=.004). There was a trend toward slowing of the progression of renal insufficiency (incidence of 50% increase in serum creatinine) in more intensive group compared to the less intensive group (more intensive, 5.2%; less intensive, 8.0%; p=.08). The only confidence interval reported was in the change in creatinine serum. The relative hazard ratio associated with assignment to more intensive versus less intensive was 0.63 (hazard ratio 95% CI=0.36-1.11, p=.11). Strength: the lowering of BP to meet new national goals for high-risk patients is a daunting challenge, one that will require a redesign of the traditional delivery ofHTN care as well as stronger lifestyle and pharmacologicinterventions. As demonstrated in this trial and in previousstudies, a multidisciplinary team approach that crossessettings and communicates with patients between officevisits has been shown to increase control rates.Weaknesses: However, we suggest that since this study hasbeen conducted successfully in the East Baltimore community,one of the most impoverished urban environmentsin the US, it could be replicated in more advantageouscommunities, yielding similar or even better outcomes.Limitations: this was a single-site study with relativelysmall sample size, we believe that the findings have importantclinical implications for improving HTN care andcontrol in urban under-served African American men.7. Allen, J.K.,Dennison-Himmelfarb,C.R., Szanton, S.L., Bone, L., Hill, M.N., Levine, D.M., West, M., Barlow, A., Lewis-Boyer, L. Donnelly-Strozzo, M., Curtis, C., & Anderson, K. (2011). Community Outreach and Cardiovascular Health (COACH) Trial: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Nurse Practitioner/Community Health Worker Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction in Urban Community Health Centers. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, 4(6), 595-602.Randomized Control Trial (RCT)A total of 525 patient, from urban community health centers, with documented cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia,or hypertension and levels of LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, or HbA1c that exceeded goals established bynational guidelines were randomly assigned to NP/CHW (n_261) or EUC (n_264) groupsRandomized,controlled clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive program of cardiovascular disease risk reductiondelivered by nurse practitioner /community health worker (NP/CHW) teams versus enhanced usual care (EUC) to improve lipids, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and patient perceptions of the quality of their chronicillness care in patients in urban community health centersThe primary outcomes were changes from baseline to one year in lipids, BP, HbA1c, and patients’ perceptions of the quality of theirchronic illness care. The primary outcomes also were operationalizedas meeting the goals for secondary prevention or experiencing aclinically significant change as follows: HbA1c _7% or clinicallysignificant decrease of _0.5%; systolic BP _140 mm Hg or_130 mm Hg if patient had diabetes or kidney disease or clinicallysignificant decrease of _10 mm Hg; and LDL-C _100 mg/dL or _130 if no CVD or diabetes or a clinically significant decrease of_20%. The chemistry laboratory at Johns Hopkins performed allbiochemical measures. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-densitylipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were measured directlyafter a 12-hour fast. LDL-C was estimated using the Friedewaldequation.31 In the event of triglyceride levels _400 mg/dL, direct measurement of LDL-C through ultracentrifugation methods wasperformed. In participants with diabetes, HbA1c was measured usinghigh-pressure liquid chromatography. BP was measured using theOmron Digital Blood Pressure Monitor HEM-907XL automatic BPdevice according to JNC VII guidelines, after 5 minutes of quiet rest,in the right arm with the person seated in a chair with arm supportedat heart level. The average of 3 BPs was recorded.The patient’s ratings of care received from their health care teamwas measured by the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care(PACIC) Survey, a 20-item patient report instrument that assessespatient’s perceptions of the receipt of clinical services and actionsconsistent with quality care defined by the Chronic Care Model.32The 5 subscales are Patient Activation; Delivery System/DecisionSupport; Goal Setting; Problem-solving/Contextual Counseling; andFollow-up/Coordination.Secondary outcomes included the lifestyle behaviors of dietaryintake measured by the Habits and History Food Frequency Questionnaire,Block 2005.1,33,34 and physical activity was evaluated withthe Stanford 7-Day Physical Activity Recall.35,36 Quality of life was measured by the 5-item EuroQol questionnaire,37 and resourceutilization and patients’ health care utilization data werecollected to conduct a cost effectiveness analysis, which will be reported separately.The data analysis for this report was generated using SAS version9.2 for Windows. Statistical tests were used to study differences in baseline demographic, clinical, and risk factor characteristics, with at test used for continuous variables and a x 2 test for categoricalvariables. Similar statistical tests were used to compare baselinecharacteristics for subjects completing the study to those lost to follow-up for any reason. Generalized linear mixed models, using a random patient-levelintercept model, were used to build multilevel models comparing theeffectiveness of the NP/CHW intervention with EUC on eachoutcome, controlling for the covariates of age, sex, race, body massindex, and insurance status, which were determined by univariateanalyses to be predictive of outcomes. Mixed models are the optimalstatistical method to use with pre-intervention and post interventionrepeated-measures data, as this modeling approach accounts for thecorrelated data structure.Evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive program of cardiovascular disease risk reductiondelivered by nurse practitioner /community health worker (NP/CHW) teams versus enhanced usual care (EUC) to improve lipids, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and patient perceptions of the quality of their chronicillness care in patients in urban community health centers.At 12 months, patients in the intervention group hadsignificantly greater overall improvement in total cholesterol,LDL-C, triglycerides, systolic and diastolic BP, HbA1c, andperceptions of the quality of their chronic illness care comparedwith patients receiving EUC.At the 12-monthfollow-up, a significantly higher percentage of patients in theintervention group compared with the EUC group had valuesthat reached guideline goals or showed clinically significantimprovements in LDL-C (EUC =58%; I = 75%, P < 0.001),systolic BP (EUC = 74%; I = 82%, P = 0.018), and HbA1c(EUC = 47%; I = 60%, P= 0.016).Strengths:An intervention delivered by an NP/CHW team using individualized treatment regimens based on treat-to-target algorithms can be an effective approach to improve risk factor status and perceptions of chronic illnesscare in high-risk patientsWeaknesses:Adoption and sustainability of this model of care will requirefinancing mechanisms for CHWs. Funding, reimbursement,and payment policies for CHWs must be established to ensurethat CHW models are adopted in mainstream health care.Limitations: The limitations of the COACH Trial include the fact that it was conducted in one federally qualified community healthsystem and used highly trained NPs and CHWs, which maylimit generalizability. Second, the recruitment and screeningprocess resulted in the inclusion of a sample of predominatelyblack women. However, this represents the majority ofpatients seen in these and other similar community healthclinics, which increases confidence in the generalizability offindings to similar settings. Third, physicians had patients inboth the intervention and EUC groups. This may haveresulted in a change in the level of care provided to theirpatients in the EUC group as they received laboratory reportsat baseline and tended to become more vigilant with theassessment, treatment, and follow-up for cardiovascular risk factor management. This may explain the improvements in clinical measures in the EUC group. Nevertheless, improvementsin clinical outcomes and perceptions of the quality ofcare were significantly greater among patients in the interventiongroup compared with the EUC group. Finally, there was a higher attrition rate in the intervention group (13%) ascompared with the EUC group (9%). However, the study waspowered to account for a dropout rate of 25%. The slightlydifferential dropout rate in the intervention group may be due to the increased commitment to participate in the interventiongroup, including more visits to the clinic resulting in more costs to the participant.8. Hacihasano?lu, R., & G?züm, S. (2011). The effect of patient education and home monitoring on medication compliance, hypertension management, healthy lifestyle behaviors and bmi in a primary health care setting. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 20(5/6), 692-705.Randomized Control Trial (RCT)This study conducted in Turkey used a study group comprised of 120 subjects (40 Group A, 40 Group B, 40 controls),all previously diagnosed with hypertension and who started medication therapy at least one year prior to start of study. The studywas conducted between February–November 2006 at public primary health care facilities and homes of the study participants.The aim of this study was to determine the effect of anti-hypertensive patient-oriented education and in-home monitoringfor medication adherence and management of hypertension in a primary care setting, by providing education on healthy lifestylebehaviors and medication adherence.Pretest data were collected through the administration of a descriptive questionnaire, medication adherence self-efficacyscale (MASES), health-promoting lifestyle profile (HPLP) to130 hypertensive patients in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd primaryhealth care facilities of Erzincan province and from personaldata (blood pressure, height, weight available in the subjects’ medical records).Final data were collected through re-administration ofthe pretest questionnaires and scales, blood pressure measurementsand weight measurement. All data were obtainedby face-to-face interview. The entire education interventionwas comprised of six interviews, two during a home visitand four at the primary care facilities. A sphygmomanometer (ERKA) wasused for the measurement. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic bloodpressures (DBP) were recorded based on Korotkoff sounds.Height measurement was obtained using a tape measurewith the patient standing on a horizontal surface with thehead, shoulder, hip and heel touching a vertical wall. Valueswere recorded in centimetres (cm). Weight measurement wasobtained using a standard scales with patients wearinglightweight clothes. Values were recorded in kilograms (kg).Body weight (kg)/height (m)2 was calculated as BMI accordingto the WHO standards. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistics software, version11.0 for Windows. To treat analysis, minimum and maximumvalues were controlled before the evaluation of thedata. Chi-square and variance analysis (ANOVA) were usedfor the assessment of the experimental groups and thecontrol group; paired t-test was used for intra-groupassessment of significance of the difference between theaverage pretest–posttest scores of MASES, HPLP, BMI andSBP-DBP; variance analysis was used for inter-groupassessment of significance of the difference between theaverage pretest–posttest scores of MASES, HPLP, BMI andSBP-DBP; Tukey test was used for advanced analysis; andMcNemar test was used for assessment of significance ofthe difference between the pretest–posttest levels ofregular and irregular using of medications in experimentalgroups and the control group. Internal consistencies of theMASES and HPLP scales were tested using Cronbach’salpha reliability coefficients. A significance level of p = 0.05was used for all comparisons.Our hypotheses were as follows: (1) Education in medicationadherence and healthy lifestyle behaviors will improvemedication adherence in the study groups (Groups A and B).(2) Education in medication adherence and healthy lifestylebehaviors will result in lower average blood pressure valuesin study groups (Groups A and B). (3) Medication adherencelevels in study Group B (education in both medicationadherence and healthy lifestyle behaviors) will be higherthan that of the patients in group A (who receive only medication adherence education). (4) The average bloodpressures of patients in study Group B who have receivededucation for both medication adherence and healthy lifestylebehaviors will be better than the patients in study group Awho have received only medication adherence education.When the effectiveness of interventions in the both controland intervention groups was compared using the SBP, DBPMASES, it was found out that the both interventions wereeffective, but combined education (Group B) more effectivethan medication adherence education alone (Group A) onblood pressure MASES scores of interventiongroups were significantly increased. Significant differenceswere noted when comparing HPLP average scores between the two study groups and between study groups and thecontrol groups (p < 0.001). For BMI, no difference wasfound between the study groups A and B, nor between GroupA and the control group (p > 0.05); however, significantdifferences were observed between Group B and the controlgroup (p < 0.05). The most significant reduction in systolic and diastolicblood pressure was seen in the intervention Group BStrengths:To the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first nursingintervention study to improve both medication adherence andhealthy lifestyle behaviors for hypertensive patients inTurkey. In this study, we shed light on professional educatorroles of the nurse. Our results indicate the importance ofreceiving nursing intervention for controlled blood pressure,healthy lifestyle behaviors and medication adherence self efficacy. Our results can be applicable to primary carefacilities worldwide because uncontrolled blood pressure,non-adherence medications and unhealthy lifestyle behaviorsare global problems. The present studyshowed that a six-month education program taught by theinvestigator, who is a nurse, along with in-home monitoringhad a significant impact on blood pressure control. Thisfinding supports the literature and verifies our secondhypothesis.Weaknesses:Individual patient education haspositive effects on hypertension; however, we advise forfuture studies that group education may be more appropriatein some settings because it saves time and is more cost effective.Limitations:In this study, standardization of physical measurementtools was not compared by an accredited institution. Use ofother robust tools for end might be considered as animportant limitation for this study.9 9. Schwarz, K., Mion, L., Hudock, D., & Litman, G. (2008). Telemonitoring of heart failure patients and their caregivers: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Progress In Cardiovascular Nursing, 23(1), 18-26. Randomized Control Trial (RCT)This pilot study was conducted ata 537-bed tertiary teaching hospitalin Northeastern Ohio. Potential participants for the study included patient/caregiver dyads who met the following criteria and routinelyused the participating hospital. The patients, aged 65 years or older,had a diagnosis of New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification II,III, or IV HF and were functionally impaired in at least 1 activity of dailyliving (ADL) or one instrumentalactivity of daily living (IADL), necessitatingassistance of a family caregiver.They received home care from the participating home care agency if itwas ordered by their physician, had Medicare eligibility and an operating telephone line, and were able tospeak English. Classic symptoms of clinical HF are shortness of breath and fatigue, and abnormalities of systolicand diastolic dysfunction may coexist.The principal investigator (PI) validated the diagnosis of systolic and/or diastolic HF with chart review ofthe cardiologist’s impressions relatedto signs and symptoms of HF, ejectionfraction and/or the echocardiographyreport after gaining oral consent fromthe patient before hospital discharge. Overall, 562 patientswere screened for eligibility (Figure).Of these, 152 (27%) were eligible; 102(67%) agreed to participate.Thepurpose of this pilot study was to examine whether telemonitoring by an advancedpractice nurse reduced subsequent hospital readmissions, emergency departmentvisits, costs, and risk of hospital readmission for patients with HF.Days to readmission,defined as the number of days betweenthe date of initial hospital discharge andthe first readmission to the hospital,was assessed through medical recordreview after 90 days’ post discharge.Physiologic health indicators, bloodpressure, apical pulse, weight, and oxygensaturation were assessed by thePI or research RN at baseline and 3months later. Co morbidities and prescribedmedications were abstractedfrom the medical record before hospitaldischarge and were confirmed atbaseline. Use of home health care wasdocumented with a computerized chartreview after 90 days’ post discharge.Severity of HF was assessed subjectivelyby the PI or research RN using theNYHA functional class at baselineand at 90 days’ post discharge.Functional status was measuredas the ability to perform ADLs andIADLs at baseline and 90 days’ post discharge.The ADL tool27 consistsof 6 items (eating, dressing, bathing,transfers, incontinence, and toileting)and is scored from 0 (totally independent)to 2 (totally dependent). Depressive symptomatology was measured using the Center forEpidemiological Studies DepressionScale (CES-D) at baseline and 90days’ post discharge. Participants rated20 items on a 4-point Likert scalefrom 0 (“rarely”) to 3 (“most or all ofthe time”) with a possible range of 0to 60. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. Quality of life, defined as patient’sperceptions of the effects of HF onone’s life, was measured with 18 items from the Minnesota Living with HFquestionnaire (MLWHF) at baselineand 90 days’ post discharge. TheMLWHF measures individuals’ perceptionsof the ways in which symptomsof HF have impacted their lives in the past month. Since the majority of patients were older and not employedand depression was assessed with theCES-D, questions about working,sexual activities, and depression were eliminated from the original scale. Eighteen items were rated on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (“no”) to 5 (“verymuch”), with a possible range of 0to 90. A higher score indicated more symptomatic impact on one’s life. Caregiver mastery, defined as apositive view of one’s ability to provide care, was measured with the masterysubscale from the PhiladelphiaGeriatric Center Care giving AppraisalScale (PGCCAS) at baseline and 90days’ post discharge. Six items assess the likelihood of caregiver uncertaintyabout how to provide care, reassurancethat the patient is receiving propercare, feeling on whether they shouldbe doing more for the patient, feelingthat they are doing a good jobof providing care, perceptions aboutcapability of dealing with problems asthey arise, and identifying the patient’sneeds. Caregivers rated 6 items on a5-point Likert scale from 1 (“never”)to 5 (“nearly always”), with a possiblerange of 6 to 30. Higher scores indicatedgreater mastery. Informal social support, describedas instrumental activities performedby families and friends, was measuredwith the tangible subscale fromthe Modified Inventory of SociallySupportive Behaviors Scale (MISSB)36at baseline. The tangible subscalereflects activities such as receiving amonetary loan. Caregivers rated 9items on a 4-point Likert scale from1 (“never”) to 4 (“very often”), witha possible sum score of 9 to 36.Higher scores indicated more informalsocial support. Cost of care was calculated for the90-day period post–initial hospitalization.Charges post hospitalizationwere calculated by tracking billingcharges for rehospitalization, emergencydepartment visits, and chargesfor usual home care from the providerof home health care.Descriptive and comparative analyseswere performed using SPSS forwindows, version 13 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics,frequencies, and measures of centraltendency and dispersion were usedto describe the sample. Associationsbetween variables were analyzed withPearson correlation coefficients forinterval variables and the Spearmancorrelation coefficient for ordinalvariables. Means were substituted forthe relatively few areas of missing data.The effectiveness of the interventionwas examined by using an intention to treat analysis; a was set at ≥.05.Outcomes were examined between the2 groups using chi-squared likelihoodratio tests for categorical variables,t tests for approximately normallydistributed variables, and Wilcoxonrank sum tests for skewed variables.Subgroup analyses were conducted,comparing the intervention and usualcare groups by risk status. Survival analysis with Cox proportionalhazard modeling was used toassess risk for hospital readmission bythe number of days between dischargeand first readmission. Cox proportionalhazard modeling accommodates for the censoring of information and accountsfor the competing risk. The pool ofpotential predictors of risk for hospitalreadmission specific to the dyad includedcaregiver mastery, informal socialsupport, and EHM. The multivariablemodel was derived using multiplemodel building techniques: backwardelimination with a=.05 stay criteria,stepwise with a=.25 enter criteria, anda=.05 stay criteria to identify independentpredictors of days to readmission.The researchhypotheses were as follows:(1): Hospital readmissions,ED visits, and costs of carewill be significantly lower for HFpatients with EHM as comparedwith usual care.(2): Rates of depressivesymptoms will be lower, but days toreadmission and measures of qualityof life and caregiver mastery will be significantly higher in the EHMgroup compared with usual care.(3): Caregiver mastery,informal social support, and EHMwill significantly reduce the risk ofhospital readmission for patientswith HF.There was no difference in hospitalreadmission between the intervention(n=12) and usual care (n=13) groups(c2=0.27; P=.60). Hospital chargesalone did not differ significantlybetween intervention and usual caregroups ($10,996.86?}$29,230.05;$5,462.58?}$9,825.00, respectively;P=.26). In addition, out-of-pocketcosts for medications, physician officevisits, and laboratory testing weresimilar between groups.Whiledifferences existed between groups at baseline with regard to caregivermastery, there were no differencesbetween groups for any outcome atthe 90-day follow-up visit. Cox proportional hazards regressionmodeling was used to identifyindependent predictors of riskfor hospital readmission in days.Independent variables includedcaregiver mastery, informal socialsupport, and telemonitoring (yes/no). None of these predicted risk ofhospital readmission.Strengths:We found no significant health care consumption or psychological benefitto patients by adding telemonitoringin the health service.Weaknesses:The overall lack of effect of ourintervention might be related to severalissues, including the experience of the current cohort of older adults and thenature of their illness. Baby boomersare more experienced with technologyand they may desire more sophisticatedmeans of monitoring their health as they age.Limitations:Our study has several limitations. Ourfindings are limited to patients classifiedin NYHA classes II, III, and IV. Since31% of patients in this study wereNYHA class IV, a replication studyusing less severely ill patients may leadto greater differences between groups,even with a short follow-up period.Although the majority of interventionpatients reported that they used theEHM system on a regular basis, the PIdid not have information about whetherteaching before hospital discharge wasconsistent between groups.Functional status, number ofco morbidities, and medication usedid not differ significantly betweengroups at baseline or 90 days’ post discharge.Patients subjectively reportedtheir functional abilities, however, andseverity of co morbidities was not studied.In past studies of patients withHF, researchers reported variations inhow medications were prescribed andissues with compliance.39,40 Althoughpatients reported taking medicationsas prescribed, a formalized monitoringsystem was not used. Informationabout dosages or changes in medicationswas not collected, and thesevariables could have differed betweengroups and affected results.Specific number of visits to thepatients’ cardiologist/primary physicianand how physicians respondedto nursing assessments were also notobtained as part of the study. Several ofthe cardiologists voiced concerns aboutthe amount of paperwork involvedwhen monitoring via an EHM system. Lack of attention to paperwork couldhave minimized information used indecision making and therefore limitedactions that could have prevented hospitalizationor early readmission.Limitations of the study may bedue to absence of control over usualcare provided by the home care agency.Contrary to this study, others useda study nurse to provide care, andtogether the PI and nurse reviewedassessments of patients.20 Finally, therewas no group that received EHM andnot home care in our study. Thus, wedo not know whether EHM wouldbenefit patients who have a similarstatus as a solo resource/service.10.Artinian NT, Flack JM,Nordstrom CK, HockmanEM, Washington OGM, Jen KC, &?Fathy M. (2007). Effects of nurse-managed telemonitoring on blood pressure at 12-month follow-up among urban African Americans. Nursing Research, 56(5), 312-322. doi:10.1097/01.NNR.0000289501.45284.6eRandomized Control Trial (RCT)Subjects were recruited from a family community center on the east side of Detroit. Participants were conveniently selected from the community center. The primary goal of screening was to identify otherwise healthy African American men and women with HTN. Criteria for inclusion were an age ≥18 years and an SBP ≥140 mm Hg or a DBP ≥90 mm Hg, unless the person self-identified as having diabetes or claimed a history of a heart attack, in which case an SBP ≥130 mm Hg or a DBP ≥85 mm Hg were acceptable. Principal exclusion criteria included the following: receiving hemodialysis, having been diagnosed with dementia or another mental illness defined as not being oriented to time, person, or place, having compliance risk (ie, self-identified heroin, cocaine, or other illicit drug user), being home- less, or having other major health problems such as the terminal stages of cancer or advanced liver disease. The sample contained 26 African Americans with a mean age of 59 years.Persons who participate in nurse-managed home telemonitoring (HT) plus usual care or who participate in nurse-man- aged community-based monitoring (CBM) plus usual care will have greater improvement in blood pressure from baseline to 3 months’ follow-up than will persons who receive usual care only.BPs were measured by using an electronic BP monitor (model A&D UA 767PC) that has been validated and is accurate to within ±3 mm Hg or 5% and falls within the Advancement of Medical Instrument standards.20 BPs were measured after a 5-minute rest period; 2 BPs were measured 5 minutes apart and the average of the 2 was used for analyses. Participants wore unrestrictive clothing and sat next to the investigator’s desk, with their feet on the floor, their back supported, and their arm abducted, slightly flexed, and supported at heart level by the smooth, firm surface of the desk.A 100% compliance rate meant that all BPs (a total of 60) were measured in the 10-week interval between baseline at week 1 and follow-up at week 12. There was a mean 67% compliance rate (SD, 0.233) in the telemonitoring group and a mean 89% compliance rate (SD, 0.082) in the community group (t10 = –2.23, P = .06). The significance level was set at 0.05.Providing easy access to BP monitoring can inform persons that their BP is elevated and will remind them of the need to take action. Taking action can mean complying with recommended lifestyle changes and, when necessary, implementing an antihypertensive drug regimen. By offering telemonitoring to patients these goals can be achieved.Both the HT group and the CBM group had clinically and statistically significant (P < .05) drops in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at 3 months’ follow-up, with participants in the HT group demonstrating the greatest improvement (HT: baseline SBP 148.8 ± 13.8, DBP 90.2 ± 5.79; 3 months’ follow-up SBP 124.1 ± 13.82, DBP 75.58 ± 11.4; CBM: baseline SBP 155.25 ± 17.014, DBP 89.42 ± 10.95; 3 months’ follow-up SBP 142.3 ± 12.1, DBP 78.25 ± 6.86). There was little change in SBP or DBP at 3 months’ follow-up in the usual care only group.Strengths: Randomization and high compliance rateWeaknesses: Small sample sizeLimitations: The findings from this research raise another important question: why did the intervention work? We do not know the mechanisms by which telemonitoring works to lower BP and achieve BP control.11.McManus RJ, Mant J, Bray EP, Holder R, Jones MI, Greenfield S, Kaambwa B, Bryan S, Little P, Williams B, & Hobbs FD. (2010). Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 376(9736), 163-172. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60964-6Randomized Control Trial (RCT)Patients were eligible for enrolment if they were aged 35–85 years, receiving treatment for hypertension with two or fewer antihypertensive drugs, had a blood pressure at baseline of more than 140/90 mm Hg, and were willing to monitor their own blood pressure and self-titrate medication. The age range for eligibility had been increased from 35–75 years to 35–85 years after 3 months when it became apparent that older patients were able to undertake the trial procedures and there were concerns about recruitment. Exclusion criteria were blood pressure more than 200/100 mm Hg, postural hypotension (>20 mm Hg systolic drop), terminal disease, dementia, score of more than ten on the short orientation memory concentration test,14 hypertension not managed by their family doctor, or spouse already randomized to study group. This randomized controlled trial was undertaken in 24 general practices in the UK.Control of blood pressure is a key component of cardiovascular disease prevention, but is difficult to achieve and until recently has been the sole preserve of health professionals. This study assessed whether self-management by people with poorly controlled hypertension resulted in better blood pressure control compared with usual care.Patients assigned to the intervention group were invited to two training sessions run by the research team. Participants were trained to monitor their own blood pressure for the first week of each month with a validated automated sphygmomanometer (Omron 705IT; Omron Healthcare Europe, Hoofddorp, Netherlands) and to transmit blood pressure readings to the research team by means of an automated modem device (i-modem; Netmedical, De Meern, Netherlands), which was connected to the sphygmomanometer and plugged into a normal telephone socket like an answerphone.17 Two self-measurements were made each morning with a 5-min interval and the second reading acted upon. A color traffic light system was used by participants to code these readings as green (below target but above safety limit), amber (above target but below safety limits) and red (outside of safety limits). A month was deemed to be “above target” if the readings on 4 or more days were above target.After 12 months, 166 (71%) of 234 patients in the intervention group ranked self-monitoring as their preferred method of blood pressure monitoring compared with 103 (43%) of 242 in the control group (p<0·0001). Confidence Interval was set at 95%Self-management of hypertension in combination with telemonitoring of blood pressure measurements represents an important new addition to control of hypertension in primary care.527 participants were randomly assigned to self-management (n=263) or control (n=264), of whom 480 (91%; self-management, n=234; control, n=246) were included in the primary analysis. Mean systolic blood pressure decreased by 12·9 mm Hg (95% CI 10·4–15·5) from baseline to 6 months in the self-management group and by 9·2 mm Hg (6·7–11·8) in the control group (difference between groups 3·7 mm Hg, 0·8–6·6; p=0·013). From baseline to 12 months, systolic blood pressure decreased by 17·6 mm Hg (14·9–20·3) in the self-management group and by 12·2 mm Hg (9·5–14·9) in the control group (difference between groups 5·4 mm Hg, 2·4–8·5; p=0·0004). Frequency of most side-effects did not differ between groups, apart from leg swelling (self-management, 74 patients [32%]; control, 55 patients [22%]; p=0·022).Strengths: Randomization, Large sample size, high compliance rate.Weaknesses: there is a need for more research because we do not know the effects of this strategy on long-term control of BP. The next phase of research needs to monitor the effects of the intervention for a longer period and allow for a gradual reduction in the intensity of the intervention.12 Parati G, Omboni S, Albini F, Piantoni L, Giuliano A, Revera M, Illyes M, & Mancia G. (2009). Home blood pressure telemonitoring improves hypertension control in general practice. The TeleBPCare study. Journal of Hypertension, 27(1), 198-203. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283163cafRandomized Control Trial (RCT)a minimum number of 288 patients were required to guarantee a power of 80% and a minimum level of significance of 0.05. Three hundred and ninety-one hypertensive patients, consecutively seen in the GPs’ offices, were screened for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were an age between 18 and 75 years, a diagnosis of uncontrolled essential hypertension, as defined by the occurrence of an office SBP of at least 140 mmHg or DBP of at least 90 mmHg and by an ambulatory mean daytime SBP of at least 130 mmHg or DBP of at least 80 mmHg (regardless of whether patients were or were not treated). Exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of secondary hyper- tension; major systemic diseases; atrial fibrillation or frequent cardiac arrhythmias or severe atrioventricular block, that is, conditions that could make HBPM and ABP measurements unreliable; obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) or an arm circumference of more than 32 cm or both, to avoid inaccuracies in automated BP readings due to arm– cuff mismatch; and any condition that might prevent patients’ participation in the study, for example, technical problems due to incompatible phone lines at home.Self blood pressure monitoring at home may improve blood pressure control and patients’ compliance with treatment, but its implementation in daily practice faces difficulties. Teletransmission facilities may offer a more efficient approach to long-term home blood pressure monitoring.All patients were subjected to at least five office visits: at screening (visit one), at randomization (visit two, after 1 week), and during follow-up (visits three to five, after 4, 12, and 24 weeks, respectively). At inclusion, the patient’s history was taken, combined with a physical examination and two BP measurements at a 5 min interval using the validated oscillometric device that had to be used for HBPM (Tensiophone device; Tensiomed, Budapest, Hungary). The software of this device was validated according to the International Protocol recommended by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on BP monitoring [11]. The device is equipped with a built-in modem permanently plugged to the house phone line and subjected to remote programming of the frequency of measurements as well as of the time of a telereminding beep, which can be sent to the patient to stimulate adherence to measurement schedule whenever appropriate. Self-monitored BP values were regularly transmitted to a referral centre where data were checked and stored in a digital database. Values exceeding upper and lower predefined arbitrary safety thresholds (180/110 and 100/60 mmHg, respectively) triggered an alarm, on the basis of which a dedicated trained nurse called the patient at home to check his/her clinical status and the possibility of artefactual measurements.288 patients were required to guarantee a power of 80% and a minimum level of significance of 0.05. Out of these 329 patients, 288 patients, in whom all data were available at the end of the study, were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Data analysis was carried out by the SPSS for Windows software, version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Quantitative variables were described through the calculation of average ? SD values for each dataset. Discrete variables were described by their absolute and relative frequency of occurrence. Between-group differences were assessed by analysis of variance for continuous variables and by the chi-squared test of Mantzel–Haenszel for discrete variables. The between-group comparison of the percentage of patients with normalized ABP was made by chi- squared test. Throughout the study, the level of statistical significance was set at a P value of less than 0.05.Self home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) has a number of potential advantages in the management of hypertension [1]. These advantages include avoidance of the ‘white-coat effect’, availability of multiple BP readings over a wide time window, evaluation of the effects of treatment on BP at different times of the day, and improvement in patients’ adherence to therapyBaseline office blood pressures were 149 W 12/ 89W9 and 148W13/89W7mmHg in groups A (nU111) and B (n U 187) respectively, the corresponding daytime values being 140 W 11/84 W 8 and 139 W 11/84 W 8 mmHg. The percentage of daytime blood pressure normalization was higher in group B (62%) than in group A (50%)(P < 0.05). There were less frequent treatment changes inStrengths: BP control was determined by ABP monitoring which provides BP values devoid of inconveniences such as the white-coat effect, the advantage of combining self-measurement of BP at home with data teletransmission is supported by two additional findings.Weaknesses: the study design prevented a comparison with the control group Limitations: The design adopted does not allow us to discriminate the role played by HBPM per se and by HBPM combined with teletransmission facilities in obtaining a greater rate of BP control.Appendix CTable3Levels and Types of EvidenceLevels and Types of Evidence123456789101112Level 1Meta-analysis or meta-syntheses from Cochrane Review (Highest)XLevel 2RCT with randomizationXXXXXXXXXXXLevel 3RCT without randomizationLevel 4Case control or cohort studyLevel 5Systematic review of qualitative or descriptive studyLevel 6Single or individual qualitative or descriptive study Clinical practice guidelinesLevel 7Expert opinion or state of the science report (Lowest)Appendix DTable 4Level of Evidence (Quality Score)StudyLevelQualityScoreDesign1-61=best1-31=bestLxQStudy # 1111Meta-analysisStudy # 2212RCTStudy # 3212RCTStudy # 4212RCTStudy # 5212RCTStudy # 6212RCTStudy # 7212RCTStudy # 8212RCTStudy # 9212RCTStudy # 10212RCTStudy # 11212RCTStudy # 12212RCTAppendix ETable 5GANTT chartAppendix FBudget for EBPCP Implementation\sAppendix GInterview Sample Questions for Patients’ Satisfaction Evaluation Open-ended questionsHow is this educational intervention via tele-monitoring helpful to you in managing your HTN, adhering to the BP medications, BP monitoring, increasing physical activity, diet control, smoking cessation and decreasing alcohol consumption? How satisfied are you with the proposed educational intervention incorporating home tele-monitoring by APNs?What additional information would you want us to include in this educational intervention? ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download