Introduction - Hanford Site
Effluent Treatment Facility Filtration System Scaled TestingProject No. VSEP Filter Test Plan – ETF Fouling SimulantDocument No. RPP-PLAN-63466PREPARED BYWashington River Protection Solutions, LLCRevision: A Status: Initial DraftAugust 6th, 2019Quality Level: QL-3TABLE OF CONTENTS TOC \o "2-4" \h \z \t "Heading 1,1" 1.0Introduction PAGEREF _Toc15966946 \h 12.0Test Objectives PAGEREF _Toc15966947 \h 22.1Success Criteria PAGEREF _Toc15966948 \h 22.2Modes of Operation PAGEREF _Toc15966949 \h 23.0Methodology PAGEREF _Toc15966950 \h 33.1Tests PAGEREF _Toc15966951 \h 33.1.1Phase 1 Test Procedure PAGEREF _Toc15966952 \h 33.1.2Phase 2 Test Procedure PAGEREF _Toc15966953 \h 33.1.3Filter Cleaning Test Procedure PAGEREF _Toc15966954 \h 53.2Test Systems PAGEREF _Toc15966955 \h 53.3Test Procedures/Run Sheets PAGEREF _Toc15966956 \h 63.4Data Collection PAGEREF _Toc15966957 \h 63.4.1Data Types PAGEREF _Toc15966958 \h 63.4.2Instrumentation PAGEREF _Toc15966959 \h 73.4.3Data Acquisition System PAGEREF _Toc15966960 \h 73.4.4Sampling PAGEREF _Toc15966961 \h 73.4.5Data Control, Storage, and Archival PAGEREF _Toc15966962 \h 73.5Personnel Qualifications PAGEREF _Toc15966963 \h 73.6Evaluation PAGEREF _Toc15966964 \h 83.7Safety PAGEREF _Toc15966965 \h 83.8Test Report PAGEREF _Toc15966966 \h 83.8.1Test Run Letter Memoranda PAGEREF _Toc15966967 \h 83.8.2Test Report PAGEREF _Toc15966968 \h 94.0Configuration Management PAGEREF _Toc15966969 \h 104.1Test Documents and Records PAGEREF _Toc15966970 \h 104.2Change Control PAGEREF _Toc15966971 \h 104.3Nonconformance Control PAGEREF _Toc15966972 \h 104.4Review and Approval PAGEREF _Toc15966973 \h 105.0Environmental Management PAGEREF _Toc15966974 \h 115.1Chemical Management PAGEREF _Toc15966975 \h 115.2Waste Management PAGEREF _Toc15966976 \h 116.0Issues, Risks, and Assumptions PAGEREF _Toc15966977 \h 126.1Issues PAGEREF _Toc15966978 \h 126.2Risks PAGEREF _Toc15966979 \h 126.2.1Equipment Malfunctions and Failures PAGEREF _Toc15966980 \h 126.3Assumptions PAGEREF _Toc15966981 \h 127.0Schedule PAGEREF _Toc15966982 \h 138.0Roles and Responsibilities PAGEREF _Toc15966983 \h 148.1Test Director PAGEREF _Toc15966984 \h 148.2Test Lead PAGEREF _Toc15966985 \h 148.3Test Operators PAGEREF _Toc15966986 \h 148.4Quality Assurance PAGEREF _Toc15966987 \h 149.0Definitions PAGEREF _Toc15966988 \h 1510.0References PAGEREF _Toc15966989 \h 16Appendix A ETF Fouling Simulant Recipe…………………………………………………………………..17Appendix B VSEP, New Logic Research Inc., Test Skid P&ID (L-Mode)……………………………….18Appendix C VSEP, New Logic Research Inc., Test Skid P&ID (P-Mode)………………………...…….19Appendix D VSEP LP Test Skid Specifications………………………………………………..……………20LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1 VSEP Filter Skid……………………………………………………………………..………..1LIST OF TABLES TOC \c "Table" Table 31: Phase 1-Test Runs PAGEREF _Toc15446582 \h 3Table 32: Phase 2 Test Run PAGEREF _Toc15446583 \h 4Table 33: VSEP Cleaner Recommendations PAGEREF _Toc15446584 \h 5Table 34: Anticipated Training for ETF Filtration Testing PAGEREF _Toc15446585 \h 8Table 41. Planned Test Documents and Records PAGEREF _Toc15446586 \h 10LIST OF ACRONYMSCFFCross Flow FilterDFLAWDirect-Feed Low Activity WasteETFEffluent Treatment FacilityFFTFilter Feed TankLAWlow-activity wasteM&TEmeasuring and test equipmentTMPtransmembrane pressure VSEPVibratory Shear Enhanced ProcessWACWashington Adminstrative CodeWRPSWashington River Protection Solutions, LLCIntroduction Washington River Protection Solutions, WRPS, operates the Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) within the Hanford Site. ETF is essential to the Hanford waste treatment mission plan as it serves the role of receiving, treating, and disposing of liquid effluents from various on-site processes. ETF’s main processes consists of organic contaminants removal/destruction, suspended solids removal, evaporation, concentration, condensation, and drying. Specifically, filtration to remove organic contaminants and solids from liquid effluents is critical for sustaining ETF’s throughput. Anticipation of colloidal and microbiological components clogging the filter has garnered significant interest due to the adverse ramifications arising from irreversible filter fouling with the current dead end filtration technology being utilized in ETF (RPP-RPT-61362). With ETF plant upgrades in progress to support the increased capacity of DFLAW operations, evaluating alternatives to the current filtration technology used in the main treatment train is necessary in order to select a path forward aimed at minimizing filter plugging and plant shutdown. The aim of this test plan, using the VSEP filter system shown in Figure 1, consists of the following: identification of a filtration technology which is resistant to filter fouling under the conditions experienced at ETF; identification of the optimal filtration media which shows low rate of fouling with high flux; demonstration of the ability to operate at throughput which, when scaled up, supports plant design throughput of 150 gpm; and achieve a 30x concentration factor thus meeting the maximum solids reject rate to the ETF evaporator of 5 gpm. Plant turndown will be demonstrate during subsequent testing (phase 3) on plant with actual basin feed water. Phase 3 testing will be the subject of a separate test plan. The plant filtration system will comprise two or three VSEP filter packs operating in parallel, so turndown to enable an operating feed flow range of 50 – 150 gpm is unlikely to be an issue. This test plan consists of a lab and pilot scale study, which will be performed in a 2 phase approach:Phase 1- lab scale testing to downselect the filter media with the highest flux and lowest fouling.Phase 2- pilot scale testing using VSEP test skid utilizing filter media selected in phase 1 to establish operating performance parameters (flow, pressure, cleaning requirements etc.) over a longer duration and to demonstrate feed concentration to 30x.All testing will be run using a filter fouling simulant as defined in Appendix A.Figure 1: VSEP Test SkidTest ObjectivesOverarching technical objectives of performing the pilot scale testing are: To determine the optimal filter media out of those tested – highest flux with lowest fouling To obtain, at pilot scale, process data to define operating parameters (i.e. feed flow, differential pressure, filtrate flow)Achieve 30x feed concentration factor To determine the most effective filter cleaning methodSuccess Criteria1) Select optimum filter media to proceed to phase 2 based on conclusive analytical data (highest flux, lowest fouling detected) when processing simulant.2) Assess filter technology in phase 2 based on the following: ability to maintain flux rate and minimize media fouling while operating in P-Mode over a longer duration period, demonstrate scale-up operating performance capabilities to ensure ability to meet ETF throughput of 150 gpm.3) 30x feed concentration factor achieved.4) Cleaning methodology selected based on ability to remove foulants and return flux to as near new conditions as possible.Modes of OperationThe two modes of operation within the VSEP test skid are L and P-Mode, corresponding to lab and pilot scale modes respectively. In L-mode the VSEP operates with a single filter disc, and in P-mode the unit operates with a 16 disc pack.MethodologyTestsTesting scope comprises of two test phases with an ETF basin water fouling simulant (see Appendix A) using 4 types of filter media. Each test run in phase 1 consists of 2 activities, clean water flux measurement using DI water and flux measurement using simulant. The purpose of phase 1 testing is to identify the best filter media in terms of absolute filtrate flux and an initial look at fouling potential. The best membrane selected from these phase 1 tests will then be installed in the VSEP unit and tested further in phase 2. Phase 2 testing is a longer term test which will better establish the fouling behavior of the membrane and the ability to concentrate the simulant feed by a volume factor of 30x. Finally some cleaning tests will be run. Following this testing, there will be a third testing phase with real basin water to confirm result on real feed. That testing will be the subject of a different test plan. Phase 1 Test Procedure Phase 1 consists of 4 test runs that use the following membranes: 0.05 ?m Teflon, UP-150, PES-30H, and UP005 for 2 hours at 100 psid in L-Mode operation. It is anticipated that 15 gallons of feed simulant will be required for each of the Phase 1 tests, or 60 gallons total. Detail instructions for L-Mode operation can be found in the VSEP Series L/P Installation, Operating and Maintenance Manual, section 8. During this test phase, the membranes are tested under the designated duration, temperature and pressure provided in Table 3-1 and the following data is collected: feed and filtrate sample, differential pressure, filtrate and concentrate flow rates. Vibration amplitude should be set at ?”.Test data should be recorded on the proforma provided on page 39 of the manual. Table 31: Phase 1-Test RunsTest RunMembraneMembrane CompositionPore SizeFeedApproximate DurationTemp (?C)*Pressure(psi)Feed Flow (gpm)1a0.05 ?m TeflonPTFE Teflon0.05 ?mDI water30mins251000.51bSimulant2 hrs251000.52aUP-150Polyethersulfone150,000 daDI water30 mins251000.52bSimulant2 hrs251000.53aPES-30HPolyethersulfone30,000 daDI water30 mins251000.53bSimulant2hrs251000.54aUP005Polyethersulfone5,000 daDI water30 mins251000.54bSimulant2hrs251000.5*acceptable range 20-50?CPhase 2 Test ProcedurePhase 2 consists of a single test run operating in P-Mode using the filter media selected in phase 1, along with a cleaning a study evaluating the effectiveness of 2 cleaners as specified in Table 3-2. It is anticipated that 1000 gallons of simulant feed will be required for this testing. Detail instructions for L-Mode operation can be found in the VSEP Series L/P Installation, Operating and Maintenance Manual, section 10. System conversion form L-mode to P-mode can be found in section 11. Phase 2 consists of a series of test steps performed in the sequence provided in Table 3-2 and collecting process data under the prescribed conditions of temperature, pressure, and flow in P-Mode (pilot mode). Vibration amplitude should be set at ?”. Test data should be recorded on the proforma provided on page 62 of the manual.Phase 2 testing will follow the steps listed below: Measurement of clean water flux baseline at 50 psid and 100 psid for the P-mode filter packMembrane conditioning using the test feed, collecting operating data every 15 minutes until a stable flux is achievedTesting at differential pressures from 50 to 100 psid in 10 psid increments (see Table 3-2)Operation at the optimum differential pressure for 30 minutes to ensure stable flux beforeConcentrating the feed sample to the target 30x volume concentration Extended period of operation at 30x concentrationCleaning study to identify optimum cleaning chemicals and procedure (see 3.1.3)Measurement of clean water flux for comparison against initial baselineTable STYLEREF 1 \s 3 SEQ Table \* ARABIC \s 1 2: Phase 2 Test RunTest StepProcessApproximate DurationTemperature (?C)*Pressure (psi)Feed flow (gpm) 1Membrane Conditioning (short-term line out**)30 mins or until flux is stable251002.5 2Pressure Study60 minutes at each pressure2550-100 (10 psi intervals)2.5 3Short Term Line Out at Optimum Pressure30 mins25Pressure selected during step 22.5 4Batch Concentrationuntil the fluxdeclines to <200mL/min or 30x has been achieved25Pressure selected during step 22.55Extended run at 30x30 hours or until the fluxdeclines to <200mL/minAs step 46Cleaning study - citric acidsee 3.1.350***50-602.5 Cleaning study - EDTAsee 3.1.350***50-602.5 *acceptable range 20-50?C**short-term line out ensures stable flux is achieved*** if heat is not available see 3.1.4 belowDuring step 5 in Table 3-2, extended duration run at 30x feed volume concentration, the feed and bleed filtration technique is implemented, see VSEP LP manual page 58. Feed and filtrate samples should be collected before step 4 and concentrate and filtrate samples should be collected after this step is completed. Filter Cleaning Test ProcedureThe effectiveness of cleaning is assessed by the TMP across the filters before and after cleaning as a function of filtrate production rate. The cleaning study evaluates two cleaning chemicals at a vendor recommended pH and dosage provided in Table 3-3. Table STYLEREF 1 \s 3 SEQ Table \* ARABIC \s 1 3: VSEP Cleaner RecommendationsCleanerpHConcentration* (%)Citric acid2.52-3EDTA11.02-3*Based on volumetric dilutionA standard cleaning study consists of the following steps:-Step 1: Flush of the test skid with clean water at or above feed material temperature at the recommended 50?C for 15 minutes in order to purge residual feed material. Once the system is purged, a fresh water flux reading at 50 psid and 100 psid and the temperature should be recorded. -Step 2: Mix the cleaning solution according to the recommended dosage rates using clean tap water for dilution. The solution is heated to 50-55?C. If hot water or a means to heat the cleaning solution is unavailable, the run times should be doubled during step 3 below. -Step 3: Recirculate the cleaning solution through the filter pack for 30-45 minutes at a 50-60 psia feed pressure while monitoring the feed pressure drops during the first 5-10 minutes to ensure pressure doesn’t drop below 30 psi for safe vibration of the filter pack as any large amounts of foulants are removed. -Step 4: Flush the system with clean water for 15 minutes purging the cleaning solution at 50-60 psi with vibration. Once the system is flushed, a fresh water flux reading at 50 psid and 100 psid and the temperature should be recorded. . After the first cleaner testing has concluded, and if cleaning is successful, the second cleaner testing may require running the filter for another period of time to foul the membrane prior to cleaning again. If the first cleaning is not successful then the second cleaning can proceed immediately.Test SystemsAll testing contained in this test plan tests will be performed at the subcontractor’s facility. The VSEP test system consists of a series of skids which can be configured to operate either in laboratory (L) mode, or pilot (P) mode. P&IDs for each of these modes are shown in Appendix B and C. Together, the P&IDs provide the overall configuration of the test platform within the context of the test program. Test Procedures/Run SheetsThe subcontractor will develop test run sheets and any required procedures consistent with the objectives and success criteria presented in this plan. The test run sheets will be reviewed and approved by the buyer prior to the start of testing. Test run sheets will include or address the following (at a minimum):Purpose and scope of testingCompletion of prerequisitesAvailability of tools and materials including personal protective equipment and measuring and test equipmentChange controlSequential and non-sequential test stepsVerification, witness, or hold pointsCollection of samplesAcceptance criteriaConfiguration of the system as testedA test log to document test evolutions, problems, important observations, etc.Preservation and control of test data recorded electronically and manually (i.e. round sheets). Data CollectionData TypesThe ETF Pilot Scale FiltrationTesting project collects both qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data consists of data that cannot be reasonably collected using measuring and test equipment. Examples of qualitative data include, but are not limited to:Visual observationsPhotographs Video recordingsQuantitative data consists of data collected using measuring and test equipment. Examples of quantitative data include, but are not limited to:ConcentrationDimensionsFluid flowPressureTemperatureTest data should be collected, recorded and controlled in accordance with the requirements of ISO9001:2015. InstrumentationReservedData Acquisition SystemData acquisition for the VSEP system is primarily manual. This should be augmented by, for example, photographs and any observations by test personnel recorded in the test log. SamplingSamples of initial feed, final concentrate and filtrate will be collected during the concentration test runs. Analysis will be limited to TSS, particle size distribution and pH. Samples collected before and after testing will consist of grab samples taken either directly from totes and tanks or indirectly through designated sample collection valves on recirculation loops. Samples collected during testing will utilize designated sample collection valves.Samples will be collected, labeled, stored, and shipped in wide-mouth Nalgene bottles or laboratory-supplied sample kits. Sample kits supplied by the analytical laboratory will be preferentially used when available. Each sampling event will collect a primary sample and a duplicate sample. Sample volumes will be a minimum of 500 mL.Samples will be labeled sequentially with a unique identifier traceable to the test procedure/run sheet and logged in the sample log. Primary samples will be designated as “A” samples. Duplicate samples will be designated as “B” samples and archived. Unique sample identifiers will be of the form:ETF-PILOT FILT-RunSheet#-XXXXX-A (for primary samples), andETF-PILOT FILT-RunSheet#-XXXXX-B (for duplicate samples)Chain of custody forms will track shipments of samples to the designated laboratory for analysis. Samples submitted for analysis will be transported to the designated laboratory in project-specific coolers. Storage, transportation, analysis and disposal of samples follows laboratory procedure once custody of the samples is transferred to the laboratory. Undissolved solids analysis will be performed by EPA standard method 180.1. Data Control, Storage, and ArchivalData, both electronic (if any) and hardcopy, will be controlled to prevent inadvertent loss or damage. Electronic data will be backed up to an external storage device at a minimum of once per day. Both electronic and hard copy data will be submitted to document control for storage and archival upon completion of a test run.Personnel QualificationsPrior to commencing testing, WRPS and any subcontractors will ensure test personnel complete requisite training. Training consists of two primary categories: training to ensure completion of test objectives and success criteria during execution and facility-specific training to ensure safe, compliant conduct of operations. Commensurate with the scope, complexity, and nature of activities to be performed, test personnel will complete training for the items identified in REF _Ref319921918 \h Table 34. Methods of training include, but are not limited to, classroom sessions, on-the-job training, or a combination of methods.Table STYLEREF 1 \s 3 SEQ Table \* ARABIC \s 1 4: Anticipated Training for ETF Filtration TestingTest ExecutionFacility-SpecificTest PlanEmergency ResponseTest Run sheet(s)Waste ManagementTest Control and Change ControlChemical Spill ResponseSamplingLock Out / Tag Out *Personal Protective Equipment* Personnel with lock out / tag out training will be determined by the test facility owner.The Test Director and Test Lead will be qualified based on training and experience. EvaluationEngineers and technical staff from WRPS will evaluate the test results and data to ensure that test equipment performs satisfactorily. The contractor issued test report will document the results of the evaluation.SafetyThe testing subcontractor will perform testing under the safety requirements of the subcontractor facility. Testing will comply with regulatory requirements and the following federal and state regulations:10 CFR 851, Worker Safety and Health Program29 CFR 1910, Occupational Safety and Health StandardsRCW 49.17, Washington Industrial Safety and Health ActAnd the following Washington Administrative Code requirements:Washington Administrative Code 173-303, Dangerous Waste RegulationsWashington Administrative Code 173-400, General Regulations for Air Pollution SourcesTesting will be conducted in accordance with industrial health and safety practices to meet applicable state and federal regulations. Oversight of safety practices related to testing activities may be performed by WRPS personnel. All personnel on the Test Team shall immediately bring any personnel safety concerns to the attention of the Test Director for immediate resolution.Test ReportTest Run Letter MemorandaLetter memorandum documenting preliminary results of test runs will be issued within 8 days of completion of test run. The content of the letter memorandum will include or address the following:Test run conditions (i.e., run sheet targets and achieved conditions)Performance of key unit operations Key observations from testing, andIdentification of success criteria achieved. Test ReportThe subcontractor will issue a test report following receipt of analytical sample results and analysis of process data. The test report will include or address the following:Test configuration(s)Test methods,Test results including summarized data for both measured and analyzed parameters,Test exceptions,System performance evaluation,Conclusions,Recommendations, andAppendices.Appendices to the test report will include or address the following:Raw data collected during testing,Drawings (i.e., as-built P&IDs) depicting the test configuration,Analytical results from sample analysis in as-reported form, and Completed test run sheets and test log noting observations on system behavior during processing.Configuration ManagementTest Documents and RecordsDocuments and records to be generated during and in support of testing are identified in REF _Ref319919757 \h Table 41. Flagged items will be maintained at the operator control area while testing. Additional documents and records that arise in support of testing will be maintained in an appropriate location as defined by the content of the item.Table 41. Planned Test Documents and RecordsItemItemTest PlanData Acquisition Files (if any) *Test Platform Controlled Drawing Package*Sample Logs*Test Procedure(s)/Run Sheets*Test Logs*Round Sheets*Test Exceptions*Calibration Records of M&TE*Test Run Letter MemorandaTraining RecordsTest Report* Maintained at the operator control area while testing. M&TE: measuring and test equipment Change ControlIf during testing, deviations to the approved test equipment configuration are encountered, or if changes to the test sequence or execution of test steps become necessary, the Test Director and WRPS shall be notified before testing progresses any further. Agreed changes should be documented in the test log in sufficient detail that the test could be recreated if necessary.Nonconformance ControlSection not applicableReview and ApprovalQualified personnel will review and approve test run sheets, revisions, substantive changes, letter reports, and test reports before issuance.Environmental ManagementThe testing will operate under the environmental management program of the subcontractor test facility. The environmental management program, which is compliant with applicable local and state regulations, addresses chemical management and waste management.Chemical ManagementTest chemicals, including cleaning chemicals, shall be stored and managed in accordance with the facility environmental management program. Waste ManagementWaste storage and disposal shall be managed in accordance with the facility environmental management program. Issues, Risks, and AssumptionsIssuesNo significant issues have been identified to date.RisksEquipment Malfunctions and FailuresDuring operations, it is possible for equipment to malfunction and/or fail. Malfunctions/failures, if they occur, will be documented in the test log along with the corrective action. AssumptionsNo significant assumptions have been identified to date.ScheduleReservedRoles and ResponsibilitiesTest DirectorThe Test Director reports to the WRPS project engineer and has responsibility for the following:Oversees execution of all phases of testingPlans, monitors, and controls the testing activities and tasksLeads, guides, and monitors the analysis, design, implementation and execution of testsSchedules tests for execution and monitors, measures, controls, and reports on the test progress and the test results, managing changes to the test documents and compensating, as needed, to adjust to evolving conditionsEnsures completion of prerequisites and resolution of safety- or technical-related issues before the start or resumption of testingEnsures collection of required test dataCoordinates and approves, in conjunction with the project engineer, substantive changes to approved test run sheetsEnsures test evolutions, problems, and important observations are documented in the test logPrepares summary reports on test status during test execution.Test LeadThe Test Lead(s) report to the Test Director and have responsibility for the following:Directs execution of all phases of testing in accordance with test plan and test run sheetsVerifies completion of prerequisites and assists with resolution of safety- or technical-related issues before the start or resumption of testingProvides technical guidance to the Test Director on test evolutionsReviews substantive changes to approved test run sheetsEvaluates test data against acceptance criteria.Test OperatorsTest operators report to the Test Lead(s) and have responsibility for the following:Operate the test systems in accordance with the safety requirements of the test facility, training, issued test run sheets and manufacturer instructions under the guidance of the Test Director and the direction of the Test Lead(s).Immediately bring any personnel safety or technical concerns to the attention of the Test Lead(s) and Test Director for resolution.Quality AssuranceQA personnel have responsibility for the following:Assure project deliverables meet QA requirements in accordance with approved procedures prior to release to the clientDefinitionsL-Mode – VSEP operational mode utilized during lab scale testing consisting of a single membrane disc, screen and drain cloth held together inside the upper and lower “L mode” clamshells.P-Mode – VSEP operational mode utilized during pilot scale testing consisting of a stack of manufactured filter membrane discs compressed together between upper and lower “P mode” pack plates.ReferencesSOW – Requisition #326448, Provision of Test Facility and Test Operator Personnel for Pilot Scale Filter Testing, Rev. 0, August 6, 2019VSEP Series L/P Installation, Operating & Maintenance Manual, Version 7.0APPENDIX A – ETF FOULING SIMULANT RECIPEThe final simulant formulation and method of preparation is currently under development, however the following tables shows the draft recipe to help in planning activities.ETF Simulant Stock CompoundsNameWater Solubility (Mol/L)Quantity (Mol/L)Aluminum Chloride (AlCl3)5.242E+003.245E-06Ammonium Chloride (NH4Cl)5.552E+004.476E-04Calcium Chloride (CaCl2)6.712E+005.530E-04Sodium Phosphate (Na2PO4)3.947E-023.65E-06Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4)2.160E+001.451E-03Iron(III) Chloride (FeCl3)4.587E+006.509E-07Ortho Silicic Acid (H4SiO4)1.249E-034.974E-04Potassium Chloride (KCl)3.192E+002.353E-04Sodium Nitrate (NaNO3)1.084E+013.089E-03Sodium Nitrite (NaNO2)1.181E+017.746E-06Sodium Bromide (NaB)1.127E+012.464E-06Sodium Flouride (NaF)1.005E+008.661E-06Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3)8.214E-012.226E-03Target Bulk Properties for ETF simulantBulk ParameterEstimated ValueUnitpH7.8pHSpecific Conductivity1,050uS/cmAlkalinity135.7mg/LTotal Dissolved Solids738.1mg/LTotal Suspended Solids39.0mg/LTotal Organic Carbon0.0mg/LAPPENDIX B - VSEP, NEW LOGIC RESEARCH Inc., TEST SKID P&ID (L-MODE)APPENDIX C - VSEP, NEW LOGIC RESEARCH Inc., TEST SKID P&ID (P-MODE) APPENDIX D – VSEP LP TEST SKID SPECIFICATIONSThere is also a second skid containing at 100 gallon feed tank and some piping and valves which will be provided as GFE (shown on the left hand side of Appendix C as “supplied by customer”). ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- adventist health careers hanford ca
- adventist health hanford careers
- adventist health jobs hanford ca
- adventist health hanford california
- adventist health hanford job opportunities
- adventist health clinic hanford ca
- adventist health hanford hospital
- adventist health hospital hanford ca
- adventist hanford ca
- adventist health hanford ca
- adventist health hanford ct
- adventist health hanford hr department