4~ - NCJRS
[Pages:57]If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at .
1
q,
Checklist And Guidelines For Evaluating Local Procurement Systems
opportunities for impro,ement in local government purchasing
? g United States GeneralAccounting Office
Part 2
/3-.-.
PSAD-78.95 AUGUST, 1978
4~
Contents
Page
FOREWORD
i
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL PURCHASING
ENDORSEMENT
ii
CHECKLIST FOR EVALUATING PROCUREMENT OF SUPPLIES,
MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES BY LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS
1
Authority and responsibility
1
Planning and scheduling acquisitions
3
Competition
6
Standardization and specifications
8
Inspection and testing
9
Property management
9
Professional development
ii
Cooperative purchasing
ii
Audit and evaluation
12
GUIDELINES FOR AUDIT OF PURCHASING FUNCTIONS IN
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
13
Introduction
13
Special instructions
13
Detailed audit steps
14
APPENDIX
Table of quantitative and qualitative
indicators arrayed as to type of assessment 35 involved
II
Basic procurement principles
37
q~
FOREWORD
Studies by our Office disclosed a need to give State and local governments guidance in evaluating and improving their purchasing systems. We have responded to this need by developing a checklist and an audit guide.
The checklist and the audit guide were developed from a study of the purchasing systems in five local governments. We are publishing them separately to facilitate their use as an independent evaluation tool.
Throughout our study, we received the cooperation and assistance of many officials of local government and the procurement community. Their contribution to our work is greatly appreciated. A letter of endorsement from the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing follows this foreword.
The guide and checklist are practical and flexible and can be used together or separately. We believe that significant system improvements, cost savings, and increased public confidence in government can result from their use.
-)
Comptroller General .,-, of the United States
2~
r,, p ~ ' ~ - ~ , ; , ~ , , ,), :, ; ~ , ~ " J '
NIGP
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL PURCHASING INCORPORATED
1001 .CONNECTICUT AVENUE
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
( 2 0 2 ) 331-1357
LEWIS E. SPANGLER Executive Vice President
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS HERBERT C. DAMRON, CPPO, President
Director of Purchasing The $1. Louis Community College District St. Louis, Missouri WILLIAM B. WHITSON, CPPO. Vice President Purchalin Agent Nashvilre-II)avidson County Nashville Tennessee JAMES P ARNOLD, CPPO, V ce Presidenl City Purchasing Agent City of Chicago, llUnois STANLEY D. ZEMANSKY, CPPO. Treasurer City Purchasing Agent City of Sellimors. Maryland
SOLON A. BENNETT, CPPO
Director. Department of Purchases and Stores
City of Austin. Texas
G. A. SERGER
Assistant Deputy Minister, Commercial Supply
Department of Supply end Services
Government of Canada
Ottawa. Ontario, Canada
JOHN BERGER, CPPO
Director of Purcheael
Metropolitan Dlde County
MLsmi, Florid=
JOSEPH O. CATHCART
Director, MunicLgal Services
City of Lea Vegas. Nevada
TOM CRITCHLEY
Prel}dlnt. Institute of Purchasing
and Su ply of Great Britain
London, ~nglend
"ROBERT G. EDGERTON. CPPO
Director, Property and Supply Department
Luserhe County
Wilkes-Barre. Pennl;ylvanla
"HOMER A. FOERSTER, CPPO
Executive Director
Texas State Board of Control
Austin, Tex/I
,
JOSEPH C. GAVIN, CFPO
Purchsser Of Supplies
City end County of San Francisco
San Francisco. Callfornll
ROBERT P. GRAHAM.
Commilaioner
?
Federal Supply Service
General Services Adm~niltration
Wesffmgton, D.C.
CHARLES W. HINTZE, CPPO
Director of Admin;ltretive Servicel
Metropolitan Sewerage District
of the County of Milwaukee, Wisconsin
"THOMAS C. IAIA, CPPO
SuPervllor of Purchases end Storel
City School District
Rochelter. New York
? DOUGLAS G JUDO, CPPO
Commissioner
Department of Purchasing and Supply
Corporation of the City of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
? DONALD F. KRUEGER, CPPO
Director of Purchasing
City of Tampa. Fief=de
RAYMOND L MOORE
Director. Division of Purchasing
Stlte of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
T. ASHBY NEWSY
Purchasing Agent
Virginia Department of Highways
end Transporlation
Richmond, Virginia
? T. GORDON SANDRIDGE, CPPO
Director of Logistical Services
Richmond Public School=
Richmond, Virrglinla
JOSEPH J. WARNAS. CPPO
Purchasing Director
Madcopa County
Phoenix. Arizona
WARREN K. WRIGHT
Deputy Director, Office of Central Services
Prince George's County
Upper Marlboro. Maryland
?Pill President
February 24, 1978
Hen. Elmer B. Staats Comptroller General of the United States General Accounting Office 441G Street, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20548
Dear Mr. Staats:
We appreciate very much the opportunity to participate with you and the members of your staff in your recent review of the purchasing systems of one county government and four city governments. We also appreciate your giving us the opportunity to participate in the development of the checklist and review guide which emanated from that review. We truly believe that the report of the study and the documents which grew out of the study i t s e l f will prove to be welcome aids to the administrators of the State and local governments.
Since its founding in 1944, the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing, Inc. (NIGP) has supported all efforts which we bel'ieve would assist in elevating the standards of public purchasing organizations. We have sought to facilitate the interchange of professional information and ideas, and we have strived to further professionalize the field by offering training courses and a certification program.
On behalf of NIGP, I urge all State and local administrators to carefully review this document, giving particular attention to the checklist for identifying weaknesses in purchasing systems, and to the companion review guide for assessing the consequencesof the weaknesses identified. I stress that this checklist and guide should not be used as a means of harrassing people, but rather should be used as a tool for more effective management.
THIRTY-THIRD ANNUAL CONFERENCEAND PRODUCTSEXPOSITION- - "MOREVALUE FOR THE TAX DOLLAR"
SHERATON CENTRE, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA, OCTOBER 14-18, 1978
Founded in 1944 An international profelsional society dedicated to raisins the s~ndordl of public purchasins and mater;als management.
ii
Hon. Elmer B. Staats February 24, 1978 Page 2 Although the document contains language and concepts that may be new to State and local governments, i t can play an important role in the quest f o r greater professionalism in State and local government purchasing. We must keep our minds open to information that might be of assistance in upgrading the effectiveness, e f f i c i e n c y and economy of our e n t i t i e s ' purchasing operations. Now, as always, we must continue to s t r i v e toward our goal of "MORE VALUE FOR THE TAX DOLLAR." Sincerely,
LES:SBG/lar
GAO note: Since receiving this letter from the NIGP, we added some "Basic Procurement Principles" as appendix II to part II of our report. NIGP has raised some concern about the specificity of some of these principles. While we believe the principles are sound, they are intended to be used as guidance and are not mandatory. They may have to be adjusted to fit the unique characteristics of a given local government.
iii
PROCUREMENT CHECKLIST
An Aid to State and Local Governments In the Evaluation of
The Purchasing Function
This checklist may be used to identify areas of weakness in the governmental purchasing system. It should be answered by knowledgeable purchasing officials.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- internal audit checklist iso as 9120 as9100 store
- purchase order checklist
- internal quality management system audit checklist
- examples of procurement compliance checklists
- procurement compliance audit framework guidelines
- internal controls checklist top accounting audit tax
- checklists for use in financial and compliance
- iso 9001 2015 quality management system assessment