Russia - WikiLeaks



Russia 111219Basic Political DevelopmentsLavrov: Moscow Expects That Kim Jong-Il's Death Won't Affect Friendly Ties Between Russia And North KoreaMoscow expects friendly ties with N. Korea to continue – FMTroops of Eastern military district continue combat duty as usual - Russian Defense MinistryNo sign of mourning seen in North Korean embassy in MoscowNothing but guesswork about North Korean situation – expert: "His [Kim's] heir is a totally unknown man. I think he has absolutely no authority in the country. He was proclaimed the heir a short time ago and, although he was awarded different titles by the Korean tradition, he had no experience of ruling a country - a small country in a profound systemic crisis," Kunadze said.Source: Ukraine wants 'to step up, speed up' talks with Gazprom - Another round of talks between the Gazprom management and Ukrainian Minister of Energy and Coal Industry Yuriy Boiko was held in St. Petersburg on Saturday, a source familiar with the situation told Interfax. UNSC to discuss Russia draft resolution on Syria India backs Russian resolution on SyriaLok Sabha storm as Russian court decides whether to ban Bhagavad Gita - The final pronouncement in the case? comes just two days after Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was in Moscow for a bilateral summit meeting with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.Anarcho-Punks Vandalize Indonesian Embassy in Moscow - In a YouTube video posted by user morevanili on Dec. 15, an unidentified man can be seen spray painting two sides of a building identified as the Indonesian Embassy in the Russian capital. Consultations between Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia Vladimir Titov in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Slovakia - Exchange of views on a wide range of international issues has focused on the tasks of strengthening security, stability and cooperation in Europe, including the problem of Russia's relations with the EU and NATO.Libya's NOC Choses Italian, Russian Gasoline Suppliers for 2012 - LUKOIL and Saras beat up to 35 other companies in the scramble to establish ties with Libya's new oil chiefs.Kremlin to host 4 summits of former Soviet republics - Moscow will host four summits of the leaders of the former Soviet republics on Monday and Tuesday, December 19-20. The Kremlin will host the negotiations between the leaders of the member-countries of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council (Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan), the Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC) (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan), the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan) and an anniversary CIS summit, which is dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the Commonwealth of the Independent States (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Ukraine).Lukashenka to stay in Moscow on Monday, Tuesday - Alyaksandr Lukashenka will stay in Moscow on December 19 and 20 to take part in a number of top-level meetings in the framework of multilateral integration alliances, according to the presidential press office. President Sargsyan visits Moscow - Within the framework of the visit President Sargsyan will participate in the session of the Collective Security Council of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the sitting of the CIS Heads of State dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the sitting of the EurAsEc Interstate Council.Kyrgyz president to discuss bilateral relations in Moscow - He will take part in a meeting of the interstate council of the Eurasian Economic Union and have a number of bilateral meetings, including the one with Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev, on Monday.EurAsEC to speed up economic integration - The EurAsEC countries are drafting a plan to speed up their economic integration. The plan is included on the agenda of the organization’s summit that’s due in Moscow later today.Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan have to work hard for joining Eurasian Economic Union – expertAgreeing on a place to meet is half the battle - Kommersant learned why the Russian president and NATO secretary general did not meet in Brussels.McFaul’s foul-free game - The US Senate confirms the new US ambassador to Russia. Trouble in the region: Russian military base in Armenia as factor in possible war on Iran - “Military base 102 [situated in Gyumri, Armenia] is a key point, Russia’s outpost in the South Caucasus. It occupies a very important geopolitical position. But the Kremlin fears lest it should lose this situation,” the periodical adds.Beating of Armenian in Russia was not ordinary hooliganismLast oil rig life raft found, no survivors aboard - No people have been found on the raft discovered by rescuers, the last of four deployed, at the site where an oil rig capsized on Sunday. So far rescuers have saved 14 of the 67 people who were aboard, with 16 confirmed dead.Four vessels, three aircraft in search for oil rig accident survivorsMissing Bulgarian expert’s wife keeps on seeking information about her husband Majority party nominates speaker Russian president’s chief of staff accepts parliament speaker post - Sergey Naryshkin, who has served as Medvedev’s chief of staff for the last four years, will become the presiding officer of the lower house of parliament. He topped the United Russia election list for the Leningrad Region in the December 4 poll.Russia Car Tycoon Shvetsov May Become Minister, Kommersant Says - Prime Minister Vladimir Putin may name automaker OAO Sollers owner Vadim Shvetsov industry minister, replacing his father-in-law Viktor Khristenko, Kommersant reported. CPRF leader nominated as pres candidate submits documents to CECRussia's Patriots party supports Putin for president It's time to do away with offshore heritage of savage privatization – PutinPutin calls for screening state-owned companies for corruption in 2 monthsSoyuz booster to be installed on Baikonur launch pad Dalai Lama to give instruction to Russian Buddhists -. Some 1,500 pilgrims are expected to arrive at his residence in Dharmasala, India, on December 19.Buryatian pres adm, parl working as normal after fire in officeCheremshanka airport building roof in Krasnoyarsk collapsesSnowstorm in Moscow kills 10Russian Press at a Glance, Monday, December 19, 2011The Power Vertical: Putin And Kudrin: Russia's Real Tandem – by Brian WhitmorePutin’s hometown turns against him – by mark mackinnon Instability a New Fear for Investors in Russia - By ANDREW E. KRAMERPutin’s Setback Exposes Gazprom as Communists Seek Higher Taxes - By Jake Rudnitsky and Anna ShiryaevskayaProtests cloud Putin’s Eurasian ambitions For Putin, it's a matter of time - By Eric Morse, Ottawa CitizenBooing Putin - By Richard LourieRussia Profile Weekly Experts Panel: From Arab Spring to Russian Winter?Russia’s accession to WTO – ‘a fair deal’? - WTO membership will seriously hit a number of uncompetitive industries in Russia, such as agriculture and automobiles, as well as light industry and machine manufacturing. But EU trade commissioner, Karel de Gucht, has told RT it was a fair deal.Russia's WTO accession to bring benefits, reformDmitry Rogozin: Russian Nationalist? Or Secret Advocate for American Taxpayers?Russian Orthodox Church Asserts Role in Civil Society - By SOPHIA KISHKOVSKYRussia re-embraces a cold war — in the North - The Kremlin has declared the Arctic critical to the country’s 21st-century economy and national security. And it is risking billions on a strategy to reverse years of neglect and decline in its Far North. By Paul Watson AP Enterprise: Russia oil spills wreak devastation - Environmentalists estimate at least 1 percent of Russia's annual oil production, or 5 million tons, is spilled every year. That is equivalent to one Deepwater Horizon-scale leak about every two months. Crumbling infrastructure and a harsh climate combine to spell disaster in the world's largest oil producer, responsible for 13 percent of global output. By Nataliya Vasilyeva In remote Russia, villagers grapple with massive natural gas project - The Shtokman field, one of the biggest natural gas fields in the world, is located way up north in the Barents Sea, 650 kilometers north of the Kola Peninsula on the northwest coast of Russia. Eva Elke | Sámi-Radio, SwedenAbramovich's attorney to make final remarks in London courtBad blood and billions: Russian titans’ UK court battle nears endNational Economic TrendsRuble Declines to 10-Week Low Versus Dollar as Oil Price FallsMarket Buzz: No Christmas surprises expected from Russian market Business, Energy or Environmental regulations or discussionsAganbegyan to Target More IPOs as Moscow Exchanges Merge: Russia OvernightRussia's MICEX, RTS exchanges close mergerMerged exchange to make new name public in H1 2012 Fifth hydraulic unit launched at Sayano-Shushenskaya HPPSibur board to discuss Sibur-Fertilizers sale on Dec 22Alrosa's Revenues Rise with PricesExec: Russia’s Sberbank ready to allot 1.7 bln rbl for start-upsBillionaire Lisin May Replace Freight One CEO, Kommersant SaysING Bank Eurasia to offer bonds worth $472m Veropharm increases sales 15% to 4.5 bln rubles in 9mthsActivity in the Oil and Gas sector (including regulatory)Russia Urals exports to slip by 1.4 pct in Q1-scheduleRussia's Tatneft denies agreed deal in Iran - "Tatneft Group have not entered into any agreements, contracts and have not accepted any other undertakings relating to oil and gas projects in Iran," it said in a statement.Russian, Iranian companies sign deal to develop Zagheh oil fieldIran, Russia ink 1 billion dollars worth of oil deal: reportCORRECTED-Russian company signs up to develop Iran oil fieldRussian oil firm Ruspetro eyes London listing –sourceTNK-BP Russian Specialists Gain Offshore Drilling Experience at Lan Do Platform in VietnamTotal, Novatek start development of Russia's Termokarstovoye gas fieldTatneft gets $75 mln Danish-backed loan for new refineryGazpromUkraine May Seek Delay on Gazprom Repayment, Kommersant Reports - NAK Naftogaz Ukrainy, Ukraine’s state energy company, may ask to delay repayment to Russia’s OAO Gazprom of an advance $1.8 billion for natural-gas transit services, Kommersant-Ukraine newspaper reported, citing an unidentified official at the Energy and Coal Ministry. Gazprom May Spend $125 Billion In Next Three Years – Report: OAO Gazprom's (GAZP.RS) board will Tuesday discuss a plan envisioning 4.0 trillion rubles ($124.8 billion) in capital spending over the coming three years, the Vedomosti daily reports Monday citing a leaked document. Verbundnetz Wins Lower Gas Prices From Gazprom, Kommersant SaysGazprom promgaz reduced 9 month net profitGazprom Drilling Rig Sinks Off SakhalinResearch and Markets: The Present and Future of Gazprom - By Benzinga Staff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Full Text ArticlesBasic Political Developments12:57Lavrov: Moscow Expects That Kim Jong-Il's Death Won't Affect Friendly Ties Between Russia And North Korea News line, December 19Moscow expects friendly ties with N. Korea to continue – FM hopes the demise of North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-il will not affect bilateral relations, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Monday. He described relations with the neighboring country as “friendly.” Representative of the Russian president in the Far East Federal District, Viktor Ishayev, expressed his condolences in a statement addressed to the son of the former leader, Kim Jong-un. The head of the Russian Communist party, Gennady Zyuganov, also offered his condolences to the North Korean leadership.December 19, 2011 09:33Troops of Eastern military district continue combat duty as usual - Russian Defense Ministry. Dec 19 (Interfax) - Troops of the Eastern Military District remain on combat duty as usual despite the demise of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il, head of the district's press service Lt. Col. Alexander Gordeyev told Interfax-AVN on Monday."Units of the Eastern Military District are carrying out their tasks as usual. The Pacific Fleet as a formation belonging to the district also continues operating in its regular mode," he said.Ml(Our editorial staff can be reached at eng.editors@interfax.ru)December 19, 2011 10:42No sign of mourning seen in North Korean embassy in Moscow. Dec 19 (Interfax) - The North Korean embassy in Moscow's Mosfilmovskaya Ulitsa appears to be working in the usual mode.The news about the death of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il came last weekend.The North Korean on the embassy building flag is flying at full mast and nothing unusual is happening near the embassy fence. There are no crowds and no flowers.av December 19, 2011 12:32Nothing but guesswork about North Korean situation - expert. Dec 19 (Interfax) - The death of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il will not destabilize the region, former Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Georgy Kunadze told Interfax on Monday."I think we should hardly expect any serious changes in the near future. As far as I understand, it would be natural to seclude and decide who is responsible for what and who is worth what," he said.The heir-apparent of Kim John Il, Kim Jong Un, does not enjoy sufficient influence in the country as yet, he said."His [Kim's] heir is a totally unknown man. I think he has absolutely no authority in the country. He was proclaimed the heir a short time ago and, although he was awarded different titles by the Korean tradition, he had no experience of ruling a country - a small country in a profound systemic crisis," Kunadze said.He stressed it would be premature to draw any conclusions because the information was scarce."We know practically nothing about the decision making process in North Korea. We have not had such knowledge for a very long time or probably never. So we may only guess what will happen and what the results will be," he said.Even if internal party disagreements occur in North Korea, they will not go beyond the country's borders, he said."When Kim Il Sung died in 1994, South Korea put its troops on the alert, the same as now. Many embassies, among them the Russian, took precautions. Yet nothing happened," he said."The situation was in an impasse during the last years of Kim Jong Il's life. So I do not see how his death may slow down the current processes," he said.As for bilateral cooperation of Moscow and Pyongyang, including the plans to build a gas pipeline across North Korea, Kunadze expressed an opinion that the death of Kim would have no effect on the process."From the very start I viewed the project of a gas pipeline laid across the North Korean territory as wishful thinking, so I do not see possible consequences. These plans were improbable from the beginning, and everyone knew that," he said.te(Our editorial staff can be reached at eng.editors@interfax.ru)Source: Ukraine wants 'to step up, speed up' talks with GazpromToday at 10:54 | Interfax-Ukraine Another round of talks between the Gazprom management and Ukrainian Minister of Energy and Coal Industry Yuriy Boiko was held in St. Petersburg on Saturday, a source familiar with the situation told Interfax. "Ukraine is looking to step up and speed up the talks," the source said.The so-called "broad delegation" of the Ukrainian government is arriving for gas talks in Moscow on Monday, he added.Read more: to discuss Russia draft resolution on Syria 19, 2011 09:49 Moscow TimeThe UN Security Council starts discussing Russia’s draft resolution on Syria, a document that urges all parties to the conflict to immediately stop violence.Earlier, Russia’s UN envoy Vitaly Churkin said that “tabling the document, the Russian side proceeded from the assumption that the Security Council should focus on stopping the Syrian conflict rather than fueling it.”According to him, Russia supports Arab countries’ initiative but continues to insist that the Arab League’s recently slapped sanctions against Syria are counter-productive and unhelpful.On Monday, Syrian President Bashar Assad is expected to sign the Arab League’s “road map” on halting bloodshed in his country.(TASS)India backs Russian resolution on Syria 19, 2011 02:08 Moscow TimeIndia?back a Russian-tabled UN resolution on Syria, which on the Syrian parties to end violence and start talks, The Press Trust of India?reports.The draft, proposed on Thursday, urges all conflicting sides to end violence and investigate the deaths of an estimated 5,000 people killed in clashes between opposition protesters and security forces since the widespread rioting flared up nine months ago.The document has already been endorsed by Brazil, Lebanon and several other countries.(RIAN)Lok Sabha storm as Russian court decides whether to ban Bhagavad Gita Correspondent/Agencies, Updated: December 19, 2011 13:03 IST Moscow:? The Lok Sabha was adjourned this morning over protests against the demand for a ban on the Bhagavad Gita in a Russian court.In a Siberian court, state prosecutors have petitioned that the Gita, distributed locally by ISKCON members, is "extremist" literature. The court in Siberia's Tomsk city is scheduled to deliver its verdict today.The final pronouncement in the case? comes just two days after Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was in Moscow for a bilateral summit meeting with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.The International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) has in recent years been noted for bulking up its? membership in Eastern Europe. The organization has more than 400 centres across the world.Earlier today, Congress MP Milind Deora tweeted, "Absurd to suggest the Bhagwad Gita is even remotely pro-violence! Hope Russian Courts appreciate its intrinsic appeal in a pluralistic India."The case, which has been going on in Tomsk court since June this year, seeks to get a Russian translation of Bhagvad Gita As It Is written by AC Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, the founder of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), on the Hindu religious text banned in Russia and declaring it as a literature spreading "social discord", apart from rendering its distribution on Russian soil illegal.In view of the case, Indians settled in Moscow, numbering about 15,000, and followers of the ISKCON religious movement here have appealed to Manmohan Singh and his government to intervene diplomatically to resolve the issue in favour of the Hindu religious text, an important part of Indian epic Mahabharat written by Sage Ved Vyasa.The ISKCON followers of Russia have also written a letter to the Indian Prime Minister's Office in New Delhi seeking immediate intervention, lest the religious freedom of Hindus living here be compromised."The case is coming up for a final verdict on Monday in Tomsk court. We want all efforts from Indian government to protect the religious right of Hindus in Russia," Sadhu Priya Das of ISKCON and a devotee of a 40-year-old Krishna temple in central Moscow, told IANS.The court, which took up the case filed by the state prosecutors, had referred the book to the Tomsk State University for "an expert" examination Oct 25 this year.But Hindu groups in Russia, particular followers of the ISKCON, say the university was not qualified, as it lacked Indologists.The Hindus had pleaded with the court that the case was inspired by religious bias and intolerance from a majority religious group in Russia, and have sought thattheir rights to practice their religious beliefs be upheld.The prosecutor's case also seeks to ban the preaching of Prabhupada and ISKCON's religious beliefs, claiming these were "extremist" in nature and preached "hatred" of other religious beliefs."They have not just tried to get the Bhagvad Gita banned, but also brand our religious beliefs and preachings as extremist," Das said.In fact, the ISKCON devotees have taken up the matter with the Indian embassy in Moscow too, apart from writing to the Prime Minister's Office in New Delhi, for an early diplomatic intervention, before things get worse and the court passes an adverse verdict banning the 'Bhagvad Gita' and Krishna consciousness teachings.In the Nov 1 letter, addressed to Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister Pulok Chatterji, ISKCON's New Delhi branch Governing Body Commissioner Gopal Krishna Goswami, said the prosecutor's affidavit claims Lord Krishna "is evil and not conforming to Christian religious view".Goswami also urged Singh to accord priority to the matter during his Moscow stay and to take it up with the Russian authorities.Indian diplomatic corps officials at the embassy here, who were unwilling to be named, told IANS that they have been following up the case since the time it was brought to their notice earlier this year and that they had also taken up the matter at the appropriate levels in the Russian government to get the case either withdrawn or get the defence to fight the case to obtain a favourable verdict.Officials at the Indian Prime Minister's office, who are part of the Indian delegation accompanying Singh, confirmed the case and the letter they received from ISKCON in this regard to IANS."This matter is receiving the highest attention and the Indian embassy officials in Moscow have been instructed to follow up the case with the Russian authorities," they said. Read more at: Vandalize Indonesian Embassy in Moscow Globe | December 19, 2011A group of self-proclaimed anarchist-punks in Moscow have released a video that shows them allegedly defacing the Indonesian embassy in Moscow in a show of support for dozens of punks being detained in Aceh.In a YouTube video posted by user morevanili on Dec. 15, an unidentified man can be seen spray painting two sides of a building identified as the Indonesian Embassy in the Russian capital. On one wall, the man writes in Russian, “Religion=Fascism.” On another wall, the same man paints the slogan, “Punk is not a crime.”The group behind the vandalization told Russian news portal ru. that “we consider ourselves anarcho-punks and this news offended us in the deepest sense.”The group went on to say that they would not tolerate religious values being imposed on personal freedom.Members of the group went on to say that they hoped the punks in Aceh would feel inspired and strengthened, hearing that people in a far-off country felt solidarity with their struggle.“Punk is not a crime. Religion is fascism. Fight for your looks,” one member said.Sixty-four young people have been held by the Aceh police for the supposed crime of being “punk.” They have not been charged with any crime or brought before a court.Last week, police took them to the Aceh State Police camp for “re-education.” Mohawks and dyed hair came off as police shaved the men’s heads. The women’s hair was cut short in the fashion of a female police officer.Deputy mayor of Banda Aceh Illiza Sa’aduddin Djamal supported the crusade against the punk community, telling the community that the punk lifestyle was a social disease that was disturbing the peace.GOOGLE TRANSLATIONPRESS RELEASEConsultations between Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia Vladimir Titov in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Slovakia 16, Deputy Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation Vladimir Titov held in Bratislava consultation with Secretary of State, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Slovakia and the political directors JEZOVICA M. P. Mihalko.Substantively discussed the practical issues of bilateral relations, discussed the possibility of increasing cooperation in promising areas, with emphasis on the implementation of the modernization agenda, as well as major infrastructure projects, including transport and energy sectors.Exchange of views on a wide range of international issues has focused on the tasks of strengthening security, stability and cooperation in Europe, including the problem of Russia's relations with the EU and NATO. It was agreed to strengthen consultation mechanism between the two countries foreign ministries in the framework of the consultations between the Plan for 2012-2013.December 17, 2011Libya's NOC Choses Italian, Russian Gasoline Suppliers for 2012 11:34:00Libya's National Oil Corporation, NOC, has said that Russia's LUKOIL and Italy's Saras were among a pool of four or five firms chosen to supply the country with up to three million tonnes of gasoline in 2012.With Libya's oil industry rapidly recovering from an eight-month conflict that halted its oil production for most of the year, a senior source at the NOC has been reported telling Reuters: "The best offers have been decided and we have informed the companies that their offers have been accepted," LUKOIL and Saras beat up to 35 other companies in the scramble to establish ties with Libya's new oil chiefs. Additional volumes had also been awarded to Greek refiner Motor Oil Hellas and Netherlands-based Tamoil, according to trading sources.Meanwhile, the NOC has also confirmed that a Greek refiner was among the chosen firms, winning a contract to supply around one cargo per month. The same source also told the news agency that it depends, according to their offers, and that some firms have offered more than others. Libya was Africa's third largest producer before the war, pumping around 1.6 million barrels per day of crude oil and exporting about 1.3 million bpd, mostly to European clients, and earlier this week, interim oil minister Abdulrahman Ben Yezza said that the country's oil output has hit 1 million barrels per day.The decision to award the volumes to key refiners is seen as a further sign that Libya's oil industry is resuming its pre-war activities. The NOC on Thursday named 10 companies that will get priority access to term supplies of its crude oil. They included traditional buyers among Europe's refiners that stood by the country's new leaders during the uprising against Al Qathafi's dictatorial regime.In a move that was seen as increasing their chances of snapping up crude oil deals for the following year, Reuters reported that trading houses Vitol and Glencore were chosen in the past two months to supply Libya's government with fuel until the end of 2011.Libya's oil exports currently remain well below pre-war levels of around 1.3 million bpd.03:15?19/12/2011ALL NEWSKremlin to host 4 summits of former Soviet republics , December 19 (Itar-Tass) —— Moscow will host four summits of the leaders of the former Soviet republics on Monday and Tuesday, December 19-20. The Kremlin will host the negotiations between the leaders of the member-countries of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council (Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan), the Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC) (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan), the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan) and an anniversary CIS summit, which is dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the Commonwealth of the Independent States (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Ukraine).The summits will begin with the negotiations of the presidents of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, Dmitry Medvedev, Alexander Lukashenko and Nursultan Nazarbayev, Russian presidential aide Sergei Prikhodko told Itar-Tass. They will meet at a meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, which was formed by the Customs Union states, first in an eye-on-eye format, then in an enlarged format involving the experts.On Monday afternoon, Tajik President Emomali Rakhmon, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan (Armenia has an observer status in the EurAsEC) and newly elected Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambayev, who participates for the first time in the summits, will join the foresaid presidents at a summit of the Eurasian Economic Community that is intended for about two hours.Already late on Monday evening Medvedev will give a festive reception at the Kremlin on the occasion of the 20th CIS anniversary. All presidents of the EurAsEC states are invited for the reception.On Tuesday, the leaders of the countries will meet at a CSTO summit in narrow and enlarged formats. An anniversary CIS summit is due on Tuesday afternoon.Prikhodko note that brief 20-minute press conferences are scheduled after each of four two-hour stages of the summit. The presidents will discuss over 50 various issues.On the days of the summits Medvedev will have several bilateral meetings. The Russian president will meet with his counterparts from Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine, Prikhodko said.Lukashenka to stay in Moscow on Monday, Tuesday / 17:30Alyaksandr Lukashenka will stay in Moscow on December 19 and 20 to take part in a number of top-level meetings in the framework of multilateral integration alliances, according to the presidential press office. In particular, the first full-scale meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council at the level of the heads of state will take place in the Russian capital city on Monday. The presidents of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia are expected to adopt a package of 17 fundamental agreements forming the legal base of the Common Economic Zone of the three states. In pursuance of the Agreement on the Establishment of the Eurasian Economic Commission, which was signed by the presidents of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia in Moscow on November 18, 2011, the heads of state will make a number of decisions concerning the beginning of the functioning of the Commission, the press office said. In particular, the Council is expected to approve appointments to the positions of chairperson and board member and adopt the Commission’s budget. “The agenda also includes discussing the sequence of joint steps aimed at the adoption of coordinated measures of trade and economic policy in the event of pressure on a member state of the Customs Union, which would make it possible to protect the interests of each of the three states in a coordinated way,” the press office said. The Council is also expected to consider a number of international agreements that would be added to the legal basis for the Customs Union. A meeting of the Interstate Council of the Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC) will also be held in Moscow on December 19. Since the Common Economic Zone starts functioning on January 1, 2012, the Council has to adopt a package of documents that would govern the EurAsEC Court, which will have its seat in Moscow, the press office said. On December 20, Mr. Lukashenka is to participate in a meeting of the heads of state of the member countries of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, and in an informal meeting of the Council of Heads of State of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), which is to be held on the occasion of the Commonwealth’s 20th anniversary. //BelaPAN President Sargsyan visits Moscow 10:31President Serzh Sargsyan is leaving for Moscow today for a working visit on December, President’s Press Office reported.Within the framework of the visit President Sargsyan will participate in the session of the Collective Security Council of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the sitting of the CIS Heads of State dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the sitting of the EurAsEc Interstate Council.December 19, 2011 13:25Kyrgyz president to discuss bilateral relations in Moscow. Dec 19 (Interfax) - Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambayev has arrived in Moscow. This is the first foreign trip of Atambayev in his presidential capacity.He will take part in a meeting of the interstate council of the Eurasian Economic Union and have a number of bilateral meetings, including the one with Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev, on Monday.Atambayev will take part in a summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and a CIS informal summit timed to coincide with the CIS 20th anniversary on Tuesday.The Kyrgyz president stressed the priority of relations with Russia many times."It is logical that Atambayev makes his first foreign visit to Moscow," a source at the presidential staff said.Head of the presidential administration's foreign policy department Sapar Isakov told Interfax that "the Moscow visit of the Kyrgyz president would focus on a number of topical issues in bilateral and multilateral cooperation with the heads of the Russian Federation and some other states.""Kyrgyzstan and Russia have similar positions on a broad range of international matters. Bishkek and Moscow closely interact in the bilateral and multilateral formats, including such international organizations as the CIS, the CSTO and the SCO," Isakov said.te(Our editorial staff can be reached at eng.editors@interfax.ru)EurAsEC to speed up economic integration 19, 2011 10:09 Moscow TimeThe EurAsEC countries are drafting a plan to speed up their economic integration. The plan is included on the agenda of the organization’s summit that’s due in Moscow later today.EurAsEC comprises Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. Under the plan, a new body, - the EurAsEC Court, is due to become operational in Minsk as of January 1st 2012 to settle disputes between the member-states over violations of competition rights and equal conditions for doing business.(TASS)December 19, 2011 11:15Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan have to work hard for joining Eurasian Economic Union – expert. Dec 19 (Interfax) - Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan will have to foster integration in their accession to the Eurasian Economic Union, a well-informed expert told Interfax."If the governments of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan decide to join the Eurasian Economic Union, they will have to take much bigger efforts than in the entry into the Eurasian Economic Community and the Customs Union," he said.The Eurasian Economic Union is a new level of integration, the expert said, comparing the new entity to the European Union. "Domestic laws will require serious adjustment. What is even more important, the adjusted economic, financial and investment laws must be implemented. That requires economic maturity and preparedness," the expert said.te(Our editorial staff can be reached at eng.editors@interfax.ru)Agreeing on a place to meet is half the battle: 19 December, 2011, 08:38Edited: 19 December, 2011, 08:40 Elena ChernenkoKommersant learned why the Russian president and NATO secretary general did not meet in Brussels.Kommersant has learned that President Dmitry Medvedev and NATO secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen were scheduled to meet on the sidelines of the EU-Russia summit in Brussels. This was perhaps the last chance to break away from the impasse in the dialogue on missile defense. However, the meeting failed to take place at the last moment. According to Kommersant’s sources, President Medvedev has no plans to meet with the NATO secretary general anytime in the near future. Moreover, February’s Munich Security Conference may be attended by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in place of the Russian president.The fact that a meeting between Dmitry Medvedev and Anders Fogh Rasmussen was possible on the sidelines of the EU-Russia summit was reported to Kommersant some time ago by a Russian diplomatic source, who specified that these are only plans (read Kommersant’s 12.08.11 issue). Last week another source from Russia’s Foreign Affairs Ministry confirmed that the meeting with the NATO secretary general had been included in the president’s schedule in Brussels. Both sides were interested in keeping the meeting as it was basically the last chance to bring the negotiations on missile defense out of deadlock, preventing the visible escalation of confrontation between Moscow and the alliance.? ?In late November, Dmitry Medvedev issued a strong statement on the deployment of US missile defense in Europe. The president censured the US and NATO for not wanting to legally guarantee to Moscow that their missile defense would not be directed against Russia’s strategic nuclear forces, accusing the West of intending to undermine Russia’s security. He also announced a number of military steps that Russia would be taking in response (read Kommersant’s 11.24.11 issue). Anders Fogh Rasmussen responded to the Russian president on the pages of Kommersant (read Kommersant’s 12.06.11 issue). The secretary general complained that “such statements reflect the rhetoric of the past and are not in alignment with the strategic relations which NATO and Russia agreed to strive toward,” but stressed that “NATO is not closing any doors” and is ready to continue the dialogue on missile defense with Moscow. Following this discourse, the NATO-Russia Council meeting was held in Brussels at the level of foreign ministers. However, no progress was made in terms of missile defense (read Kommersant’s 12.09.11 issue). Therefore, all hopes were placed on Dmitry Medvedev’s personal meeting with Anders Fogh Rasmussen in Brussels.????? Kommersant’s source in Russia’s Foreign Affairs Ministry stated that it had been confirmed in advance that Dmitry Medvedev would have time to speak with Anders Fogh Rasmussen immediately after the end of the EU-Russia summit, and suggested holding the meeting at the president’s hotel. However, at nearly the eleventh hour, the NATO secretary general’s office replied that, while riding his bike, Mr. Fogh Rasmussen had fallen, breaking his arm, and had difficulty moving. Office representatives then asked if Mr. Medvedev could travel to the secretary general’s house or NATO headquarters.? ??“We were surprised by this response,” said Kommersant’s interlocutor. “After all, a broken arm did not prevent the secretary general from participating in the Russia-NATO Council meeting at the level of ministers on December 8.” Russia suggested a compromise, to hold the talks on neutral territory, such as a restaurant. However, according to Kommersant’s sources, NATO insisted on either the secretary general’s home or headquarters. As a result, the meeting never took place.Kommersant’s source from NATO headquarters confirmed the scheduled, but unrealized, meeting between the NATO secretary general and the Russian president. According to him, “it’s nobody’s fault the meeting did not take place. There was the desire to meet, the parties had made an attempt to meet, but in the end, plans broke down due to different schedules,” explained Kommersant’s interlocutor.Be that as it may, Dmitry Medvedev and Andres Fogh Rasmussen are unlikely to get an opportunity to speak face-to-face about the issue anytime soon. According to Kommersant’s sources, today the Russian leadership is trying to decide who will travel to the Munich Security Conference in February. Dmitry Medvedev was issued an invitation by the forum’s organizer, Wolfgang Ischinger, a year ago. However, Moscow does not exclude the possibility that the conference will be attended by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin instead of the president. Last time he spoke in Munich was in 2007, when Mr. Putin gave the harshest speech in relation to the US and NATO in all the years of his presidency.McFaul’s foul-free game: 19 December, 2011, 08:32Edited: 19 December, 2011, 08:37 Aleksandr Gasyuk (Washington) The US Senate confirms the new US ambassador to Russia. Suitcase, airport, letter of credence – this is the approximate order of business that will soon need to be addressed by the new US ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, who after several months of “political football” between the Barack Obama administration and its opponents on Capitol Hill was finally confirmed in this role by the US Senate. ?The senators’ confirmation of the US president’s top adviser on Russia and senior director of Russia and Eurasian Affairs at the National Security Council, Michael McFaul, who is not only considered to be one of America’s leading experts on Russia, but also an expert on the promotion of democracy, as well as the architect of the “reset” between Moscow and Washington, was preceded by several rounds of fierce political debates between lawmakers and the White House. As a result, the lawmakers’ confirmation of the new candidate as the head of the US diplomatic mission in Moscow had been delayed several times entirely due to political reasons – no one had any objections against McFaul, personally. ?While, initially, McFaul’s nomination was objected to by Sen. Bob Corker (R-Ten), who used the issue to ensure full funding of the nuclear laboratory in his home state of Tennessee from the Obama administration, eventually the US top adviser’s nomination was blocked by Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill). Kirk, like several other colleagues from Capitol Hill, called on the White House not to share any secret anti-missile defense information with Moscow. ?“For some US senators, approval of McFaul’s candidacy is their only opportunity to force the administration to meet their demands in terms of disclosure of information in negotiations with Russia. This is their only chance – they simply will not have another opportunity – and they are planning to use it,” a source from the office of one of the legislators told Rossiyskaya Gazeta (RG). ?In the end, the White House addressed a letter last week to the senator who was concerned about US missile defense, which stated: “We will not provide Russia with sensitive information about our missile defense systems that would in any way compromise our national security.” The Obama administration assured the senator that “strike-to-kill technology and interceptor telemetry will under no circumstances be provided to Russia.”?? ?Interestingly, the White House reserved the right to exchange secret information with Moscow “in the event…it will increase the president's ability to defend the American people.”As a result, last Tuesday, Sen. Kirk withdrew his objections against McFaul’s candidacy, and on Saturday, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell agreed to confirm several candidates, including the claimant to the post of US ambassador to Russia, yet simultaneously blocked about fifty other appointees nominated by the Barack Obama administration to executive and legislative offices,. ?It is noteworthy that from the very beginning Michael McFaul’s candidacy was supported by many critics of the Obama administration’s Russian policies, indicating that the appointment of McFaul, who served as the first representative of the National Democratic Institute in Moscow, “will send Russia a strong signal from the US Senate in support of human rights, transparency, and the rule of law.” Senators are expecting the new US ambassador to Russia to raise some of the most sensitive issues related to the “state of democracy in Russia,” and intend to give him “new levers of soft power that will underline America’s support for Russians and their calls for freedom and democracy.”?? ?The new occupier of Spaso House [the Moscow residence of the US ambassador] will most likely arrive in Moscow next year and present his letter of credence to the Russian president in the second half of January. The current US ambassador to Russia, John Byerly, will be turning his duties over to McFaul in Washington as Byerly will be leaving Russia this week.? ?According to RG’s sources, Michael McFaul, who is also a co-chairman of the US-Russian Bilateral Presidential Commission's Civil Society Working Group, will be replaced by Thomas Melia, who currently serves as the deputy assistant secretary of state in the Bureau of Democracy. As for John Byerly, RG’s interlocutors from the State Department do not exclude the possibility he may be leaving the State Department and moving into the private sector due to a lack of any suitable vacancies in the department.16.12.11 | 14:20 Trouble in the region: Russian military base in Armenia as factor in possible war on Iran Naira HayrumyanArmeniaNow correspondentThe United States has stepped up sanctions against Iran amid ongoing information preparations for the possible application of force against Iran. Both the Islamic Republic and Russia, which remains a major player in the region, have warned that a military strike against Teheran may entail unpredictable consequences. But Russia has gone further and, in fact, stated that it will take part in the possible war, because it may affect its vital interests.Among these ‘vitally interests’ for Russia may also be its military base, which is located in Armenia and which also has the functions of protecting the security of the South Caucasus ally.The influential Russian Nezavisimaya Gazeta newspaper published an article on Thursday quoting sources as saying that the situation forming around Syria and Iran “causes Russia to expedite the course of improvement of its military groups in the South Caucasus, the Caspian, Mediterranean and Black Sea regions.” The paper quotes sources at the military department as saying that the Kremlin has been receiving information about plans for a U.S.-backed Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “The strike will be a sudden one and will happen soon, but the data is unspecified. Tehran’s response is likely to be quick, too, with the possibility of a full-scale war, whose consequences could be unpredictable,” the Russian newspaper writes.“Military base 102 [situated in Gyumri, Armenia] is a key point, Russia’s outpost in the South Caucasus. It occupies a very important geopolitical position. But the Kremlin fears lest it should lose this situation,” the periodical adds.Remarkably, the Russian newspaper suggests a new war is possible between Russia and Georgia. It says that Georgia now blocks the only land transportation route for Russian military cargoes meant for the military base in Armenia, and even fuel now has to be obtained from Iran. “In fact, the Russian-Armenian group in the South Caucasus is already isolated. The war in Iran would mean the cutting of supplies through this channel.”Russia has also decided to “strike” Azerbaijan, dropping hints that it is from its territory that Israel might attack Iran. On Thursday it was officially stated in Baku that Azerbaijan will not be used as a springboard for an attack on Iran. But military expert Colonel Vladimir Popov thinks that in such a situation Azerbaijan may also solve some of its problems as well.“If against the background of the war in Iran, Azerbaijan, with the support of Turkey, attacks Armenia, then, of course, all the attacks of the enemy aircraft against Armenia will be resisted by Russia together with air defense units of the armed forces of Armenia. It is hard to say whether this will be considered as Moscow’s participation in military operations. Undoubtedly, Russian troops will not participate in hostilities in the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. But in the event of a military threat to Armenia, for example, from Turkey or Azerbaijan, Russia is likely to engage in ground battles,” says Popov.Beating of Armenian in Russia was not ordinary hooliganism 18, 2011 | 17:17 The beating of Armenian Aram Haykyan, in Rostov-on-Don, Russia, was not an ordinary hooliganism, Heritage Information Center Management Director Armen Mkrtchyan told Armenian News-NEWS.am.Mkrtchyan also added: “Aram’s Russian friend, who was with him at the time, said the following: They returned home together on December 3. Then several youth appeared before them. The youth immediately took out medal bars, and one of them had a knife. They attacked the youth without additional words. Then Aram’s friend fled, telling Aram to do the same. Sometime thereafter, the friend called Aram’s phone. He did not answer and the friend returned to look for his friend [Aram]. He found Aram drenched in blood.”Armen Mkrtchyan also informed that Aram had a gold chain in his hand, he had close to 3,000-4,000 rubles, and an expensive telephone, but they were not taken. And the eyewitnesses said they saw several youth nearby who shouted nationalist slogans.??????To note, the incident occurred on December 3, Aram was taken to hospital, he underwent two surgeries, and he only regained consciousness on December 16.?An investigation is underway.Last oil rig life raft found, no survivors aboard: 19 December, 2011, 11:55Edited: 19 December, 2011, 13:22 No people have been found on the raft discovered by rescuers, the last of four deployed, at the site where an oil rig capsized on Sunday. So far rescuers have saved 14 of the 67 people who were aboard, with 16 confirmed dead.This has shattered the initial hopes that 15 more people could have potentially survived more than 24 hours in the freezing waters. Earlier there were conflicting reports saying rescuers have apparently found a raft that could contain around 15 people in the freezing waters off Russia's Far East coast.Previously the rescuers have found three lifeboats – all of them empty. One lifeboat remained unaccounted for by search and rescue teams, who said it could potentially be found with survivors on board.Altogether 16 people are now confirmed dead after more bodies were found in the freezing waters. Thirty-seven people are still missing. Fourteen people have been rescued so far, more than a day since the tragedy occurred.Four vessels, an An-74 plane and two helicopters are involved in search and rescue efforts. Captains of fishing and trade vessels in the vicinity of the accident area were also ordered to take part in the search-and-rescue operation.The rescue mission is being hampered by the harsh weather conditions in the region with strong winds and waves of four to five meters.An investigation was launched and survivors will be questioned later in the day. Violations of safety rules and unfavorable weather conditions are seen as the most likely causes of the accident."The investigators on Monday will question three crew members who are currently in the central regional hospital in the town of Nogliki, Sakhalin. The remaining nine survivors and crew of the Neftegaz-55 tugboat which transported the rig will be questioned upon their arrival to the port of Korsakovo," a spokesman for the regional investigation department said.The incident happened December 18, 200 kilometers off Sakhalin Island, when Kolskaya rig was being towed by an icebreaker and a tow boat to Sakhalin Island after finishing its drill mission.?The conditions at sea at the time have been very severe, with waves up to six meters high and winds of 70 kilometers per hour. A storm damaged two of the rig’s air tanks, which gave buoyancy to the platform and caused the rig to tip over. As a result, the rig tilted and capsized in roughly 20 minutes.This happened as helicopters were preparing to evacuate 53 crew members and 14 passengers, as staying aboard was deemed too risky in such conditions.The Kolskaya rig was built in 1985. At 70 meters long and 80 meters wide, it was one of the largest oil rigs in Russia. It was due to set sail for drilling off the Vietnamese coast at the end of its current mission.The rig incident is the second high-profile maritime disaster in Russia this year. In July, the pleasure boat Bulgaria sank during a cruise on the Volga River in a storm. Of the 201 people on board, 122 died when the ship went down in a matter of minutes. Investigators blamed negligence and violation of safety rules for that incident.Four vessels, three aircraft in search for oil rig accident survivors 19/12/2011VLADIVOSTOK, December 19 (RIA Novosti)Four vessels, an An-74 plane and two helicopters are involved in search and rescue efforts on Monday after an oil rig overturned in the Sea of Okhotsk in Russia's Far East.The Kolskaya drilling rig with 67 people aboard was being towed in a severe storm, when it overturned and sank some 200 km (125 miles) off Russia's Sakhalin Island early on Sunday. Of 67 people onboard, 14 were rescued, four were found dead and others are missing.The An-74 plane found two life rafts on Monday morning, but it is yet unknown whether there were any survivors in them.A lifeboat was found earlier on Monday, but it was empty. On Sunday, four empty life rafts were found.Captains of fishing and trade vessels in the vicinity of the accident area were also ordered to take part in the search-and-rescue operation.The weather forecast for the search zone is currently being verified, but the rescue operation was hampered on Sunday with strong winds and waves of 4-5 meters.An investigation was launched and survivors will be questioned later in the day. Violations of safety rules and unfavorable weather conditions are seen as the most likely causes of the accident."The investigators on Monday will question three crew members who are currently in the central regional hospital in the town of Nogliki in Sakhalin. The remaining nine survivors and crew of the Neftegaz-55 tugboat which transported the rig will be questioned upon their arrival to the port of Korsakovo," a spokesman for the regional investigation department said.The Kommersant business daily said on Monday that about a half of all people onboard the oil rig were not authorized to be there under the transportation rules."Approximately a half of all people onboard - drill rig engineers, their assistants, crane operators and so on - had no relation to the transportation of Kolskaya," an unnamed source close to the investigation told the newspaper.Under the rules, only the captain and a minimal part of the crew needed for the transportation process are allowed to stay onboard when the rig is tugged. It is forbidden to tug a drilling rig with passengers onboard.The drilling rig, built in 1985 in Finland, carried out work under a contract with energy giant Gazprom. It can take up to 102 people on board, was. The rig, which is 69 meters long and 80 meters wide, was intended to drill a well at a depth of 3,500 meters.Missing Bulgarian expert’s wife keeps on seeking information about her husband December 2011 | 09:32 | FOCUS News AgencyHome / BulgariaSofia. The relatives of Bulgarian expert Zhivko Zhekov, who was on the sunken Kolskaya oil rig, do not have any information about his whereabouts, his wife Boyka Zhekova told FOCUS Radio.She read in the Internet that the insurance company Nobel Denton had confirmed Zhekov’s presence on the rig. She said that she had received the last SMS from her husband on December 11 and added she got information neither from the Foreign Ministry, nor from any Bulgarian other institution. She tried to get in touch with the Foreign Ministry, but could not. She will keep on seeking information about her husband on Monday. Majority party nominates speaker , 19.12.2011, Moscow 10:27:45.Former presidential chief of staff Sergey Naryshkin has been nominated for speaker of the State Duma, the lower house of parliament, by the majority party United Russia, secretary of the party's general council presidium Sergey Neverov said on December 17.??????Neverov, Oleg Morozov, Andrey Vorobyov, and Lyudmila Shvetsova have been nominated for four deputy speakers. Vorobyov is also expected to head the party's group in the State Duma. Russian president’s chief of staff accepts parliament speaker post : 17 December, 2011, 22:45Edited: 17 December, 2011, 22:45 Sergey Naryshkin, who has served as Medvedev’s chief of staff for the last four years, will become the presiding officer of the lower house of parliament. He topped the United Russia election list for the Leningrad Region in the December 4 poll.Rumors as to who will take up this important position have been flying around since the previous speaker, Boris Gryzlov, surrendered his mandate. Naryshkin headed the list of potential candidates, along with the deputy prime minister, Aleksandr Zhukov, who is in charge of Russia’s Olympic Committee. Zhukov was passed over for the post because MPs feared it would detract from his duties. MPs felt that Naryshkin was the strongest candidate for the position of speaker, with his many years of political experience. The man himself said the matter of his taking the post was discussed, not just with fellow party members, but with opposition parties, the president and prime minister.The position still has to be officially voted upon by all 450 deputies, and the minimum votes needed for Naryshkin to take the job are 226. But with United Russia winning 238 parliament seats, the fact that the remaining three parties are not keen to offer Naryshkin their votes might not matter very much.Russia Car Tycoon Shvetsov May Become Minister, Kommersant Says Ilya Khrennikov - Dec 19, 2011 9:48 AM GMT+0400 Prime Minister Vladimir Putin may name automaker OAO Sollers owner Vadim Shvetsov industry minister, replacing his father-in-law Viktor Khristenko, Kommersant reported. Deputy Industry Minister Dmitry Manturov is also being considered to replace Khristenko, who will move to the Eurasian Economic Commission, the Moscow-based newspaper reported today, citing unidentified people familiar with the matter. Shvetsov is the main shareholder and chief executive officer of OAO Sollers, which makes Explorer sport-utility vehicles with Ford Motor Co. To contact the reporter on this story: Ilya Khrennikov in Moscow at ikhrennikov@ To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Viljoen at jviljoen@ 11:05?19/12/2011ALL NEWSCPRF leader nominated as pres candidate submits documents to CEC , December 19 (Itar-Tass) —— Gennady Zyuganov, leader of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, on Monday submitted his documents to the Central Election Commission to be registered as a presidential candidate.It is rather a big package of documents, including his personal application with his consent to run for the election, biographic information, data about his incomes and property for 2007-10 and so on.The commission must within five days check the documents and in case of its positive decision to register the candidate's representatives and permit to open an election account. Then, the contender for the country's main post will have the right to begin the official registration procedure.Zyuganov was nominated as a presidential candidate at the CPRF congress on December 17. He already participated in presidential elections for four times.Russia's Patriots party supports Putin for president 19/12/2011MOSCOW, December 19 (RIA Novosti) - The Patriots of Russia party has decided to support Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in the presidential election scheduled for March 2012, leader of Patriots of Russia Gennady Semigin said.“The central political council of the party made the decision to support Vladimir Putin in the presidential election,” Semigin said on Monday at a news conference held at RIA Novosti's main office in Moscow. The Patriots is a left-wing nationalist and socialist party that largely consists of former members of the Communist Party of Russia and the far-right Liberal Democratic Party (LDPR), as well as fans of modern Russian folk music. The party is headed by former Communist Party member Gennady Semigin. This year the party gained 0.96 percent of the vote in the State Duma election. While acknowledging that the Patriots opposed Putin's ruling United Russia party for more than six years, Semigin said the current political discord persuaded the party to join the All-Russia People’s Front and throw its support behind Putin.12/19 13:18 ? It's time to do away with offshore heritage of savage privatization – Putin 19, 2011 13:06Putin calls for screening state-owned companies for corruption in 2 months, Khakassia. Dec 19 (Interfax) - Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has bound relevant ministries together with law enforcers to screen all companies with a government stake for corruption schemes and connections with off-shore zones within two months."I request the Energy Ministry, the Economic Development Ministry, industry agencies within two months to check companies with a government stake such as Gazprom (RTS: GAZP), Vnesheconombank, and it wouldn't hurt Sberbank (RTS: SBER) either. Bring all things to an end," he said at a session of a government commission for advancing power engineering held at the Sayano-Shushenskaya hydro power plant.Ml(Our editorial staff can be reached at eng.editors@interfax.ru)Soyuz booster to be installed on Baikonur launch pad 19, 2011 09:19 Moscow TimeThe Soyuz booster with a space capsule will be transported to the Baikonur launch pad on Monday ahead of the December 21 blast-off to carry an international crew of three to the ISS.On board the capsule are ESA astronaut André Kuipers, NASA astronaut Don Pettit and Russian cosmonaut Oleg Kononenko.The three’s ISS mission is due to be completed before the end of May 2012.(TASS) ?RT News line, December 19Dalai Lama to give instruction to Russian Buddhists Dalai Lama is to give a special instruction session to Russian followers of Tibetan Buddhism. Some 1,500 pilgrims are expected to arrive at his residence in Dharmasala, India, on December 19. The three-day event is organized by religious organizations from Moscow and the republics of Buryatia, Kalmykia and Tyva. This year the Dalai Lama is for the first time going to give teachings as just a religious leader. Earlier this year he resigned as the head of the Tibetan Government in Exile and handed over power to an elected official ending a centuries-long tradition.09:50?19/12/2011ALL NEWSBuryatian pres adm, parl working as normal after fire in office, December 19 (Itar-Tass) —— The Buryatian presidential administration and the republic's parliament are working as normal after a fire was extinguished in their building on Monday morning.The people have returned to their office rooms, a presidential administration official told Itar-Tass.The information about a blaze on the roof of Buryatia's main office building was received by the rescue service at 04:45 Moscow time this Monday. The first EMERCOM crew arrived at the site in five minutes. One hundred and five people were evacuated from the building, a source at the Russian Emergencies Ministry's main department in Buryatia said.According to the preliminary information, the fire was caused by a short circuit. The blaze did not spread. It was extinguished at 05:11 Moscow time. Six square metres of the roof are damaged. Nobody was hurt.More than 70 firemen fought the fire. They used 23 vehicles, including 16 fire engines.09:33?19/12/2011ALL NEWSCheremshanka airport building roof in Krasnoyarsk collapses, December 19 (Itar-Tass) — The roof of the Cheremshanka airport building in Krasnoyarsk has collapsed because of the fire that broke out on Monday morning. There were no immediate reports about casualties there, spokeswoman for the regional emergencies department Yelena Yastrebkova told Itar-Tass.Meanwhile, the fire spread to the second floor of the building. The room of the air traffic controllers that is above the top floor has been engulfed in flames. Fire fighters are trying to evacuate people staying there. The fire has spread over a total area of 2.5 thousand square meters.The whole reserve personnel and all equipment have been alerted for fire-fighting efforts. Twelve water tank trucks and four ladder trucks have been dispatched to the airport, located 40 kilometers from Krasnoyarsk,“It is not ruled out that the fire alarm came late because the local fire-fighting service was trying to put out the blaze on its own,” Yastrebkova explained.The Cheremshanka Airport services flights on local air routes. It is also the base airport of the Siberian Regional Emergencies Department Centre.Snowstorm in Moscow kills 10 | Source: Pravda.RuA sudden change of weather in Moscow and in the Moscow region has caused several car accidents with tragic outcomes.Ten people have been killed in the accidents, about 30 were hospitalized. A snowstorm and a drop of temperature by several degrees have literally turned Moscow roads into staking rinks, especially on bridges. The snowstorm will continue in the Russian capital, and weather conditions may become even more extreme: meteorologists expect an ice storm in the city.Trees may fall and electric power lines may break in such weather, Vesti.ru website said.Residents of several areas of Moscow and the region have witnesses ice balls with water inside falling from the sky, NTV reports. That was a phenomenon of the ice storm, meteorologists said.?Russian Press at a Glance, Monday, December 19, 2011 19/12/2011POLITICSAt a meeting with United Russia party leaders, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said the party requires urgent reform. Meanwhile, the party’s faction in the State Duma has already changed its leaders: 12 chairmen out of 15 State Duma committees will be replaced(Kommersant, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Moskovskie Novosti, Vedomosti, Izvestia)Rallies to demand free elections were held in Russia’s major cities over the weekend, but organizers failed to gather the same number of participants as during the December 10 protests(Kommersant, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Rossiiskaya Gazeta)Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was to meet with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen on the sidelines of the Russia-NATO summit in Brussels in a last-ditch attempt to find a solution to the European missile defense issue. However, the meeting was cancelled at the last moment and no new talks are expected in the next few months(Kommersant)President Dmitry Medvedev has confirmed Anton Siluanov as finance minister, a?sign, some analysts say, that the?career economist will remain in?the Cabinet after presidential elections and?that the?former minister, Alexei Kudrin, will not return.(The Moscow Times, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Moskovskie Novosti, Vedomosti, Izvestia)United Russia on?Saturday backed Kremlin chief of?staff Sergei Naryshkin to?become speaker of?the State Duma, the?party said.(The Moscow Times, Rossiiskaya Gazeta)Russian Industry and Trade Minister Viktor Khristenko will be appointed head of the Eurasian Economic Commission and is likely to quit the ministerial post by the year-end(Kommersant, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Rossiiskaya Gazeta)Unprecedented protests in?Kazakhstan's oil-producing Mangistau region spread on?Sunday to?the regional capital, where hundreds of?angry protesters faced reinforced police troops. According to official information, 13 people were killed and 99 injured in the clashes, but residents put the death toll at 30 to 70 people(The Moscow Times, Kommersant, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Moskovskie Novosti, Izvestia)The?U.S. Senate approved President Barack Obama's top adviser on?Russia policy, Michael McFaul, as the?country's ambassador to?Moscow. The new ambassador is sometimes referred to as the “architect” of the Russian-U.S. ‘reset’(The Moscow Times, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Moskovskie Novosti)?ECONOMYThe?World Trade Organization officially welcomed Russia as a?member Friday, bringing the?curtain down on?the country's 18-year accession process.(The Moscow Times, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Moskovskie Novosti, Vedomosti, Izvestia)IMF head Christine Lagarde gave a grim economic forecast late last week, saying that the world economy was on the verge of a new Great Depression. However, the official IMF forecasts are more optimistic on the issue(Nezavisimaya Gazeta)?METALS & MININGUnited Company RusAl, the?world's largest aluminum producer, said the?euro currency crisis may cause a?"cyclical panic" in?the commodity markets, prompting a?decline in?metal demand from?smaller manufacturers(The Moscow Times)?OIL & GASAt?least four people died when the?floating Kolskaya oil rig overturned and?sank with 67 people on?board in?the stormy Sea of?Okhotsk as it was being towed to?shore, 200 kilometers off Sakhalin Island.(The Moscow Times, Kommersant, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Moskovskie Novosti, Vedomosti, Izvestia)Belarus received a discount for Russian oil. Along with gas discounts, Belarus will save $4 billion a year(Vedomosti)?POWER GENERATIONIndia plans to?start up a?Russian-built nuclear power plant within weeks, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said Friday, expressing confidence that the?government can ease safety concerns that have prompted protests by?local residents.(The Moscow Times, Nezavisimaya Gazeta)?SOCIETYVaclav Havel, the?dissident playwright who wove theater into?politics to?peacefully bring down communism in?Czechoslovakia and?become a?hero of?the epic struggle that ended the?Cold War, died aged 75.(The Moscow Times, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Izvestia)Russia has slipped one place in the rating of the world's biggest countries by population and now ranks eighth with 142.8 million inhabitants, the State Statistics Service said(The Moscow Times, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Moskovskie Novosti, Vedomosti, Izvestia)?For more details on all the news in Russia today, visit our website at en.rian.ruThe Power Vertical Putin And Kudrin: Russia's Real Tandem 16, 2011 Amid all the showmanship and bravado on display during Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's live call-in program yesterday, there also came a rare moment of sincerity.This happened when Putin was asked to comment on former Finance Minister Aleksei Kudrin, who resigned under pressure following a public spat with President Dmitry Medvedev in late September."Aleksei Leonidovich Kudrin has not left my team," Putin said. "We are old comrades, he's my friend. He did a lot for the country. I'm proud that this man worked in my government. Such people are needed and will be needed in current and future governments."On one hand, Putin's comments can be viewed as a subtle dig at President Dmitry Medvedev, who demanded Kudrin's resignation after the finance minister criticized his plans to increase military spending by $65 billion over the next three years. (The rare public dust-up came just days after Putin announced that he intended to return to the Kremlin next year and planed to make Medvedev his prime minister. Kudrin was reportedly not happy about the job swap.)But there is probably more to it than that. The prime minister's remarks also a sign that Kudrin remains influential despite his resignation three months ago.It's not clear whether Kudrin will return to serve in the government -- a move that would certainly cheer nervous investors -- or go on to form a liberal political party.But he remains a player -- and one who is not going to be shy about speaking his mind about Russia's current political impasse.In comments to reporters hours after Putin spoke on Thursday, Kudrin made it clear that at the moment his sympaties lie with the tens of thousands of anti-Kremlin protestors who took to the streets on December 10 to protest electoral fraud -- and plan to do so again on December 24."I myself support honest elections," Kudrin told reporters. "The elections just held took place with major violations and we have not yet heard an adequate answer from those responsible, and in general from the powers that be."He also took Putin to task for disparaging remarks he made about the mass demonstrations. "I don't agree with this attitude towards the protesters...there is no need to provoke them," Kudrin told reporters.Kudrin is the most senior member of Putin's team thus far to come out so strongly -- and publicly -- in favor of the protestors. And he is in a prety unique position to make his voice heard.Putin and Kudrin are indeed very close friends, dating back to their time working together in the St. Petersburg government under Mayor Anatoly Sobchak in the 1990s. (As I have noted on numerous occasions, Kudrin is widely rumored to be the only official allowed to use the familiar "ty" form with Putin in private conversations.)In addition to personal affinity, Putin also has a great deal of professional respect for Kudrin, whom he tasked with keeping Russia's fiscal house in order while he consolidated political power and strengthened his power vertical.Kudrin's vigilance and insistence on fiscal discipline often put him in conflict with other members of the ruling circle, most notably Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin, who oversees the energy sector and is the informal leader of the siloviki clan of security service veterans close to Putin.Sechin -- who is far less enamored of fiscal discipline than Kudrin -- tried on numerous occasions to get the finance minister sacked. But each tme Kudrin came under threat, at least until the public feud with Medvedev, Putin backed him up.For most of his public life, Kudrin steered clear of politics, preferring to play the role of the competent technocrat and economic manager. That all changed earlier this year, when he began calling for political reform, arguing that without it, true economic modernization would be impossible.Speaking at the Krasnoyarsk Economic Forum in February, Kudrin said Russia needed open and inclusive elections, arguing that in order to make difficult and painful economic choices, the government will need a "mandate of trust" from the Russian people.And in March, during an appearance at the forum "Russia and the World: Looking For An Investment Strategy," Kudrin made the case again:"This country needs an institution that will make sure that we participate in formulation of these rules and their application," he said. "As matter of fact, we already have such an institution, and by that I mean elections."Putin failed to heed Kudrin's earlier calls for political liberalization, which now look prophetic. Will he listen to the advice of his old friend and colleague now?-- Brian WhitmorePutin’s hometown turns against him mackinnon ST. PETERSBURG, RUSSIA— From Monday's Globe and Mail Published Sunday, Dec. 18, 2011 8:45PM ESTLast updated Sunday, Dec. 18, 2011 8:46PM ESTNo city is more closely associated with Vladimir Putin’s rule than St. Petersburg. The Russian Prime Minister grew up in what was then Leningrad, and attended KGB school here. During his 12 years in power, Mr. Putin’s governments have poured billions into restoring the palaces, canals and bridges of this graceful former capital of the Russian empire.But being showered with favouritism is no longer enough. The city that Mr. Putin says he “loves” is now a centre of the growing opposition to his rule.According to the official – and hotly disputed – results of the country’s Dec. 4 parliamentary election, Mr. Putin’s United Russia party took 35 per cent of the vote in St. Petersburg, one the lowest levels of support in the country. It represented a rebuke for Mr. Putin, who took nearly three-quarters of the vote here when he last ran for president in 2004.Residents of the city say they’re tired of the growing authoritarianism and unchecked corruption that have become associated with Mr. Putin’s time in power.“Honestly, I live well. But I already spent 30 years of my life under a totalitarian regime and I don’t want to do it again, to feel unfree inside. Everything in this country is corrupt, and that’s because of one person, Putin,” said a 48-year-old businessman who was among an estimated 5,000 anti-government protesters that gathered Sunday on Pioneerskaya Square, near the city centre. Surrounded by a cordon of thousands of riot police, the demonstrators called for a rerun of the Dec. 4 vote, and chanted “Without Putin, Russia will be free!”A series of previously rare demonstrations have erupted around the country since the election, which many see as marred by evidence of widespread fraud. With bigger protests planned for next weekend, many participants say their real goal is to show their opposition to Mr. Putin and his plan to return to the presidency (a post he held from 2000 until 2008 before becoming prime minister) next year.Some of those on Pioneeskaya Square said they initially supported Mr. Putin during his rise to power. “You could say I was fooled,” said Shamil Randuev, a 32-year-old information technology specialist who said he had never been to a political protest until the past two weeks. “But if Putin becomes president again in March, I’m honestly leaving this country for at least 10 years. I’ll have kids somewhere else so that they’re not eaten by this system. This is not a government, it’s organized crime.”President Dmitry Medvedev is a St. Petersburg native too, as are most of Mr. Putin’s inner circle of advisers and cabinet ministers. Russians elsewhere grumble about the powerful “St. Petersburg clan” and this city’s disproportionate political and economic influence over the rest of the country.But Sergei Shelin, one of the city’s best-known journalists, said St. Petersburgers no longer see Mr. Putin as one of their own. “Ten years ago, it mattered that Putin was from St. Petersburg. But the St. Petersburg clan and St. Petersburg, the city, are different things. People don’t see themselves as part of this clan. … If Putin actually gets the real information through all his filters, it must personally bother him that his hometown doesn’t love him any more.”Part of the reason St. Petersburg – Russia’s most open and Westernized city – has turned on Mr. Putin is that he has proven to be anything but the reformer many had hoped he was. Before he was unexpectedly anointed Boris Yeltsin’s successor, Mr. Putin served a deputy to the liberal governor of St. Petersburg, Anatoly Sobchak. Many here expected Mr. Putin would follow Mr. Sobchak’s liberal course once he got to the Kremlin.Instead, Mr. Putin has taken Russia several strides back toward its Soviet past, with both the media and the officially registered opposition parties being brought under tight Kremlin control.Last week, Mr. Sobchak’s daughter, Ksenia, joined the opposition protests in Moscow. “I can no longer just silently watch what is happening in my country,” the 30-year-old socialite, who has known Mr. Putin since she was a young girl, wrote on her Twitter account. “The point of no return has been passed.”Instability a New Fear for Investors in Russia ANDREW E. KRAMERPublished: December 18, 2011 MOSCOW — The street protests in Moscow that have raised the prospect of deep political reforms have had the opposite effect on the country’s stock exchange: it has plummeted faster than any other major equity market in the world over the last two weeks.The plunge is all the more remarkable because many foreign investors, who drive the market here, have been grumbling for years about the same problems of pervasive corruption, judicial fraud and political stasis that angered the protesters. Instead, investors have focused on the short-term instability, even if the goals of the protesters are in line with those of investors. “There are cracks appearing in the facade,” Bruce Bower, a portfolio manager at Verno Capital in Moscow, said in a telephone interview. Fitch, the ratings agency, has said that Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin will almost certainly be elected president in March, despite the protests. But the agency cautioned about the possibility of a rise in public sector spending to sooth tempers. The government has already announced large salary increases for police and military officers. This could send ripples to already fragile European neighbors, who are looking to Russia for help with their sovereign debt troubles. President Dmitri A. Medvedev last week offered to contribute up to $20 billion to an International Monetary Fund package to help stabilize the euro. The president’s economic aide, Arkady V. Dvorkovich, said Russia might extend a $10 billion loan to the I.M.F. that was due to be reimbursed, and contribute another $10 billion if clearer plans emerged for financing a firewall for vulnerable euro zone nations like Italy and Spain. Russia’s announcement helped to buoy European markets last week, though the sum was modest compared with the hundreds of billions of dollars in standby reserves that many economists say will be necessary to maintain investor confidence in the euro. If the domestic turmoil were to crimp Russia’s ability to deliver on the pledge, it would prove a setback. Along with politics, political risk has returned to Russia, and the outlook for change — unheard-of only a few months ago — has become a part of the calculus of investment. Russian share prices peaked the day after parliamentary elections on Dec. 4, when the ruling party won as expected, though with only a small majority, and tumbled as the protests began. The Micex market slumped 11 percent to a trough on Dec. 12, compared with an average 6 percent decline for other emerging markets, according to Aton, a Moscow brokerage. The protests have emerged in strange parallel with high oil prices and an economy that is still growing. Andrew Risk, an equity strategist at Aton, said the street protests in Moscow were compelling businesses to “ask questions that never really occurred to them before,” including assessing the chances of instability and how it would affect companies. In recent Russian economic history, economic and political change moved in tandem, starting with the arrival of both capitalism and democracy with the fall of the Soviet Union. The increasing reliance on the police and security under Mr. Putin coincided with a partial nationalization of industry. Today, economists see the biggest hurdles for Russia’s economy as diversifying away from dependence on oil and promoting high technology and small and medium businesses to cushion downturns in commodity prices — reforms that many of the urban protesters would also surely welcome. “If they are under more pressure from the population to open up and understand the severity of the tasks ahead, then the potential is immense,” Mr. Risk said. Russia’s 30-stock Micex benchmark index fell faster than any of the 21 major emerging market indexes tracked by Bloomberg news after the election. Russian publicly traded companies are now also, on average, the cheapest of any in the emerging markets. For example, Gazprom, the state gas monopoly, trades for 3.1 times estimated earnings, a pittance, particularly in light of the company’s vast, untapped natural gas reserves, the world’s largest. Some investors are seeing a buying opportunity in the protests. Per Brilioth, the managing director of Vostok Nafta, a Swedish fund that invests in Russia, said the demonstrations were unlikely to unseat Mr. Putin and the market would rebound. “You can like what’s happening, or you can disapprove, but the politics are stable,” he said. “I was very bullish from the outset to invest into worry in the election cycle.” The picture of a country with underlying woes despite the high price of oil that had for many years been sufficient to keep the economy and government afloat was already emerging this year as investors began pulling money out of Russia. The government has estimated about $70 billion will leave Russia in capital flight this year. Partly, the outflow reflected loans called in by European banks. Moscow bankers’ renewed focus on political risk was seen at the opposition rally last week. Sergei Khlystov, 34, who said he worked in finance, showed up at the huge pro-democracy protest on Dec. 10 smartly dressed in a necktie and dark overcoat, carrying an attaché case. Mr. Khlystov was not there to upend the government of Mr. Putin but to gauge the impact of political developments on business. “I wanted to see with my own eyes what is going on here,” he said. The Russian markets had swooned the day before. “It may be connected with this, and I came to see what is going on.” His conclusion? Many in the crowd, he said, were there “just to hang out” and would pose no serious challenge to Mr. Putin. “You know, for something to change, there should be many more people.” Another demonstration, planned for Saturday, seems likely to clarify whether the movement will persist, or taper off during the holidays. David Herszenhorn contributed reporting. Putin’s Setback Exposes Gazprom as Communists Seek Higher Taxes Jake Rudnitsky and Anna Shiryaevskaya - Dec 19, 2011 1:01 AM GMT+0400 OAO Gazprom, the world’s biggest natural-gas producer, faces demands to pay more tax after opposition groups gained against Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s ruling party in Russian parliamentary elections. “The liberals, the Communists and the social democrats all agree on raising Gazprom’s taxes,” Vladimir Milov, the leader of the liberal Democratic Choice Movement and a former deputy energy minister, said in a phone interview from Moscow. State-owned Gazprom, Russia’s biggest company by revenue, enjoys a tax rate that’s less than half the country’s oil producers. The company’s tax burden, which totaled $23 billion last year, should double to bring it in line, Sergei Levchenko, a Communist Party member who served on a parliamentary energy committee, said by phone from the Siberian city of Angarsk. Putin, whose United Russia party suffered its biggest setback since he came to power more than a decade ago, has been slow to raise taxes on Gazprom. With a smaller majority in the State Duma, parliament’s lower house, Putin may be forced to seek compromises with other factions. The Dec. 4 election sparked protests against voter fraud and Putin’s plans to return to the Kremlin in March’s presidential vote. Russia expects a budget deficit of 1.5 percent of gross domestic product in 2012 after a balanced budget this year, Putin said Nov. 16. Oil and gas accounted for about 49 percent of budget revenue in the first 11 months of this year, according to the Finance Ministry’s website. Tax Growth Gazprom paid 731.3 billion rubles ($23 billion) in taxes last year, or about 20 percent of revenue, according to its 2010 financial report. State-controlled OAO Rosneft, the country’s biggest oil producer, paid $30.3 billion in taxes, or 48 percent of revenue, according to its financial statements. The gas producer may pay $39.5 billion in taxes this year, with an effective tax rate of 22 percent, compared with a 52 percent rate for Rosneft this year, said Constantine Cherepanov, an analyst at UBS AG in Moscow. “Gazprom is the biggest business structure in Russia, yet much smaller energy companies pay higher tax rates,” the Communist Party’s Levchenko said. The increase could be imposed through profit or mineral extraction taxes, he said. The Communists will have the biggest voice after United Russia when the new Duma meets this month. United Russia won 238 seats in the 450-member State Duma, according to the Central Elections Commission, down from 315 in the 2007 vote. The Communists will get 92 seats, up from 57; Just Russia doubled its tally to 64 from 32 and the Liberal Democratic Party won 56 seats, up from 40. More Pressure “Given the added weight the opposition has in the Duma, it’s realistic to expect more pressure to increase Gazprom’s tax burden,” Milov said. Gazprom is already facing one tax increase. As the budget slid into the first deficit for a decade last year, the Finance Ministry pushed through the first increase in the mineral extraction tax for gas producers in five years, raising the rate by 61 percent this year. Next year, Gazprom’s mineral extraction tax rate will more than double to 509 rubles for 1,000 square meters of gas from 237 rubles this year, according to the Kremlin website. The tax for the gas export monopoly will climb to 582 rubles in 2013 and 622 rubles in 2014. That may add 150 billion rubles to Gazprom’s mineral extraction tax bill in 2012, based on company estimates. Vulnerable to Spending Higher natural-gas tariffs at home, which are scheduled to climb 15 percent in July next year, will partially offset the higher extraction tax. Gas producers, led by Gazprom, are still vulnerable to plans to raise revenue through further tax increases, UBS’s Cherepanov said by phone. Gazprom may cut its investment program to compensate for higher levies because it has excess production and demand isn’t growing domestically or abroad, Alexei Kokin, an oil and gas analyst at UralSib Financial Corp., said by phone. “There’s nowhere else to take the money from and there’s serious potential to increase Gazprom’s tax burden,” he said. Gazprom has “fat” that can easily be trimmed, Kokin said. Higher taxes are likely because the government, which owns more than 50 percent of Gazprom, may not want to pay out earnings to other shareholders as dividends, he said. The gas company is not aware of any immediate plans to raise taxes, said a company official, who declined to be identified because of corporate policy. Oil Production Risk Gazprom has budgeted as much as 200 billion rubles a year for dividends in 2012 through 2014, Interfax reported on Dec. 1, citing an unidentified person familiar with the plan. That would make the 2012 cash dividend (GAZP) 6.40 rubles a share, the highest payment since at least 2005. The gas industry is a tempting target for government because any attempt to tax oil producers more heavily could risk undermining production, Kokin said. Last year, Putin said oil production will remain above 500 million metric tons a year, or 10 million barrels a day, for at least 10 years. That is more than Saudi Arabia this year. Gazprom continues to lobby for tax breaks for a number of projects in remote, gas-rich areas, including the Shtokman project in Russia’s Arctic Ocean, which it plans to develop with Total SA and Norway’s Statoil ASA. Russia is considering tax breaks for Shtokman, Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko said on Dec. 7. French Prime Minister Francois Fillon last month urged Russia to exempt the project from the mineral extraction tax and export duties. Gazprom is seeking similar tax breaks to develop natural- gas deposits off Russia’s Pacific coast and in the Yakutia region, Viktor Timoshilov, an official in charge of the company’s eastern projects, said in September. To contact the reporters on this story: Jake Rudnitsky in Moscow at jrudnitsky@; Anna Shiryaevskaya in Moscow at ashiryaevska@ To contact the editors responsible for this story: Will Kennedy at wkennedy3@; Stephen Voss at sev@ First Published: 00:27 IST(19/12/2011)Last Updated: 00:29 IST(19/12/2011)Protests cloud Putin’s Eurasian ambitions domestic problems of Vladimir Putin also put into question his ambitious “Eurasian Union”, a foreign policy strategy which seeks to see Russia assert economic and political influence among key ex-Soviet Republics.India also sees an opportunity for its own relations in this region if the Eurasian Union comes to fruition.The heart of the plan, says Ivan Sofranchuk, deputy director of the Institute for Contemporary International Studies, Russian Diplomatic Academy, is the creation of a common economic space built around an exisgting customs union with Kazakhstan and Belarus. The Eurasian Union would also open up labour movement and possibly harmonize taxes and other economic regulations among its members.But Putin’s great ambition is that this union would eventually rope in Ukraine, the second-largest Soviet republic and one which Russians see as closest in cultural and historical terms to themselves. “Ukraine has yet to say it will join such a union,” says Sofranchuk. “But with 40 million people and its location it would add greatly in terms of membership value.”Putin had planned to make this union the cornerstone of his foreign policy after he became prime minister once again, said Fyodar Lukyanov, editor of Russia in Global Affairs.Until the protests against the recent parliamnetary elections in Russia, Putin had reason to be optimistic. Russia had seen relative economic and political stability the past few years, making it an attractive partner to a bankrupt Belarus and an already economically close Kazakhstan. Indian officials say that if a Eurasian Union comes through, Indian goods and services would be able to use their near-completed free trade agreement with Russia to access all these countries as well.For Putin, it's a matter of time Eric Morse, Ottawa CitizenDecember 19, 2011 2:08 AM??Vladimir Putin's days are numbered, but probably not to the extent that his opponents would like. Judging by his recent public performances, if the anti-Putin demonstrations in Moscow continue to be treated as tolerantly as those of the past week have been, they are still not going to overthrow any regime. And warning signs have been given that there are limits; local media coverage was heavily censored and influential editors were summarily fired. A cynic might be waiting for the mass arrests to start, but Putin is probably more subtle than that - for now.Putin will probably win his March presidential election with a "managed majority." He will then have - nominally - up to 12 more years in power. The "revolving-door tsardom" looks like a guarantee of regime stability. In reality, it is anything but. Putin is in a weak position in the long run, because he has no real institutional legitimacy.To survive into succeeding generations, even an authoritarian regime needs broad-based institutional legitimacy of some sort. Although it lasted only 70 years in the end, the Soviet regime had this, mainly conferred by the Communist Party's much-distorted but very real leadership in the Second World War. Toward the end, no matter how grungy day-to-day existence got, or how sour the jokes were in the street ("Did you hear Ivan changed jobs? He used to steal in the tailor shop but now he steals in the grocery shop.") nobody seriously questioned the institutions of State and Party.A seat in the Supreme Soviet might have been nominal but it was a local honour nonetheless. People might have been tired of the processions of black limousines in special lanes, but the succession of those who rode in them was managed without a hitch from Nikita Khrushchev's emergence in 1956 through Mikhail Gorbachev's succession in 1985.Checks and balances are required in such a system, but unlike those we are used to, they operate mainly at the second tier of power and inside the ruling organs themselves. The Party leaned heavily upon the security apparatus, but made sure that it was never a power unto itself after 1953 when its last Stalinist chief Lavrentiy Beria was shot (after at least a Star Chamber proceeding; some proprieties were observed even then). The officers of the Armed Forces never viewed themselves as independent political actors. Otherwise, it was more or less a collective balance of normative behaviour at the top; the Politburo and Central Committee made sure that none of their individual members got out of line. It was a recipe for stagnation, but 30 years of stability in that part of the world might still provoke nostalgia, and it might have lasted longer if Gorbachev had not tried to fix it without realizing he was breaking a closed system with incalculable consequences.Contemporary China has a similar system. Perhaps owing to social media, perhaps simply because our own sophistication has evolved and China is far more engaged with the world than Soviet Russia was, we see their internal problems more clearly in real time, but it is clear that the important decisions are taken behind the veil of the Party, whose legitimacy is to be defended at all costs. Given China's history, almost any alternatives are too terrible to imagine.The Iranian regime likewise has a broad power base. The middle classes may despise the rule of the mullahs but, by and large, the rulers do not have to care particularly; they are broadly supported by the clergy and backed up by a Revolutionary Guard and large armed militia (basij) that has its interests solidly identified with the regime's. There may be violent power squabbles, but the regime itself is not going anywhere anytime soon.Since the end of Soviet power in 1991, institutional legitimacy has been the elephant in the room for Russia's rulers. Whatever the Communist Party may have been, nothing has replaced it. Putin does not have a broad base that is meaningfully tied to him. He has relied on manipulating the plutocrats through misuse of the judicial system, but the plutocrats themselves are a weak reed, effectively emasculated. He has taken over the levers of State and media power and brought the regional governors under control by personal appointments and outright intimidation. But he has nothing resembling a Revolutionary Guard or armed basij, or a cause beyond his own power for anyone to support, and those elements are crucial to an authoritarian regime in its first generation. So he has tried to substitute personal rule-by-revolving-door, and everyone sees through it.Putin may last another year or even several, but in the end he will come down - unfortunately, probably messily. And given the range of likely successors, and the continuing lack of binding national institutions, when he does come down those in the West who wished for it may regret that they got their wish.Eric Morse, a former Canadian diplomat, is vice-chair of security studies at the Royal Canadian Military Institute in Toronto.? Copyright (c) The Ottawa CitizenBooing Putin December 2011By Richard LourieThere is a?powerful scene in?the movie "Doctor Zhivago" that goes a?long way in?explaining recent events in?Russia. In?the scene, a?tsarist officer climbs onto a?water barrel to?address mutinous troops. At?first, he quells their revolutionary rage with the?timbre of?command in?his voice, but then suddenly the?top of?the barrel gives way under him and?he falls in. Drenched, comical, he loses all dignity and?authority. The?soldiers make short work of?him after that.Political leaders of?the strong man sort can afford to?be seen as crude, cruel, indifferent, even at?times inept. The?one thing they cannot afford to?be seen as is silly. And?that's exactly what happened with Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in?early October during his now infamous scuba dive in?the Black Sea. Wearing all the?latest high-tech gear, Putin boldly descended to?the perilous depths of?3 meters and?re-emerged triumphantly with two ancient Greek amphoras that had been placed there for?him to?"discover" after having been scraped clean of?the unphotogenic encrustations of?the centuries.At?first, it seemed no more than another publicity stunt to?burnish Putin's macho image, like riding horseback bare-chested, bringing down tigers with tranquilizer darts, and?throwing opponents in?martial arts matches. But there already had been some questions about these photo ops — how dangerous was the?tiger, how determined was the?opponent? A?chess champion summoned to?the Kremlin to?play with Stalin, when asked how the?dictator played, answered lugubriously: "Bad." Stalin's lack of?talent made him even more ominous. Putin's lack of?diving ability just made him look silly.There is a?direct line connecting the?scuba incident and?Putin being booed at?a martial arts match in?Moscow in?November while in?the ring to?congratulate the?Russian winner on?being a?"real man." No doubt the?crowd booed him because they did not want some politician, any politician, horning in?on their event. But, more important, Putin was booed because he had suddenly become booable. The?tsarist officer lost his authority when he fell into?the water, Putin when he emerged from?the water with his pre-planted trophies.And?the problem with macho charisma is that once it's lost, it's near impossible to?regain. The?rules are very strict on?this point.There is another straight line connecting the?booing with the?mass anti-Putin rally of?Dec. 10. The?cries of?"Russia Without Putin," "Retire Putin" and?"Putin is a?Thief" were the?verbal, political equivalents of?the boos at?the martial arts match.You even have to?feel a?little sorry for?Putin, who has to?keep his balance between a?semi-sham democracy and?a real but soft authoritarianism. Rulers in?the past had it much easier. For?example, Tsar Nicholas I not only forbade criticism of?himself but praise as well, considering it an?impertinence. In?fact, my compassion for?Putin has moved me to?a verse that plays on?the Russian word for?KGB station chief:"A New Term for?Putin"There's nothing highfalutin About Vladimir Putin Even though history has set him a?task That's more than any world leader could ask: To?combine the?KGB With democracy. So, I'd like to?propose, though still a?bit hesitant, That his post be renamed — the?(P)rezident.Richard Lourie is the?author of?"The Autobiography of?Joseph Stalin" and?"Sakharov: A?Biography."Read more: The Moscow Times Russia Profile Weekly Experts Panel: From Arab Spring to Russian Winter? by Vladimir Frolov Russia Profile 12/16/2011 Contributors: Vladimir Belaeff, Dick Krickus, Edward Lozansky, Nicolai Petro, Anthony Salvia, Ira Straus, Alexandre Strokanov, Andrei TsygankovTens of thousands of ordinary Russians turned up for a rally in downtown Moscow on December 10 to protest against massive vote rigging during the December 4 parliamentary elections. They called for a cancelation of the election results, a new election and for election officials to be fired. Is this the end of Putin’s stability? Is Russia on the brink of a tectonic societal shift? Is this the Russian equivalent of the “Arab spring” or, more appropriately, the “Russian winter?” How will the street protests affect the upcoming presidential elections next March?The trigger appeared to be the widely-documented evidence of massive vote fraud in Moscow, where United Russia’s official results (46.5 percent) greatly exceeded exit poll data collected by the pro-Kremlin Foundation for Public Opinion (27 percent). This meant that in Moscow alone, about a million votes were brazenly stolen to skew the election results in favor of United Russia. Without this fraud, United Russia would not have secured its 238-seat simple majority in the new Duma. Yabloko finished third in Moscow with about 20 percent of the vote, and without the vote rigging would have probably made it into the Duma.The public protests shook Russia’s system of managed democracy to its core and put the authorities on the defensive. Russia’s political system has been based on coercive manipulation of public opinion and public politics, not outright repression, and on the genuine popularity of Vladimir Putin. But as U.S. political analyst Donald Jensen noted, “the embarrassment inflicted on United Russia showed that Russia’s implicit social contract between the regime and the ruled – economic growth in return for giving up political power – is starting to fray.” Jensen further argued that United Russia’s poor performance at the polls “also demonstrates that Putin’s job switch with Medvedev struck many Russian elites as a cynical ploy to perpetuate the rule of leaders more interested in power than in coping with Russia's problems.”Indeed, it could well be argued that a massive protest vote against United Russia was in large measure a vote against Putin’s return to the presidency. As Russian political commentator Fyodor Lukyanov argues, Putin grossly miscalculated with the way he announced his comeback in September, which demoralized the elites and failed to arouse any enthusiasm in Russian society.Putin, Medvedev and other Russian officials reacted to the public protests in Moscow and other cities in ways that only underscored their increasing detachment from reality. Putin blamed the United States for instigating the protests, his spokesman said the government had “no position” in regard to the mass rally in Moscow, while Medvedev improbably sought to downplay the scale of electoral fraud, calling Vladimir Churov, the chairman of the Federal Election Commission widely blamed for electoral violations, a “wizard.”For the entire week, Russian state television channels simply ignored the protests, while covering the pre-paid rallies by Nashi and other pro-Kremlin youth groups. The Kremlin’s political strategist, Vladislav Surkov, has suggested, somewhat belatedly, that the government should create a popular liberal party, comprised of “annoyed city communities” to soak up the discontent.Putin now goes into the presidential campaign significantly weakened; his ratings are going down while his Teflon status has been scratched. He exhibits signs of grossly misreading the public mood and shifting toward Soviet era stylistics, appealing to older voters while ignoring the young. He appears to have lost his edge, while the so called “Putin’s majority” – a combination of different social groups that for different reasons have genuinely supported Putin until now – is unraveling. He either has to reinvent himself in the next two months or blame the West for his troubles, which is likely to be a losing strategy. He is, of course, fortunate to have an uninspiring list of likely opponents in the presidential vote – Communist leader Gennady Zuganov, the Liberal Democartic Party’s Vladimir Zhirinovsky, and Putin’s friend Sergei Mironov, the leader of the Just Russia party.Is this the end of Putin’s stability? Is Russia on the brink of a tectonic societal shift? Is this the Russian equivalent of the “Arab spring” or, more appropriately, the “Russian winter?” Will the street protests fade out or force the authorities to yield to the protesters’ demands, such as annulling the Duma election results and repealing the draconian political party registration law? How will the street protests affect the upcoming presidential elections next March? Is Putin’s victory in doubt? Is he really vulnerable? What does the authorities’ response say about their ability to handle this crisis?Alexandre Strokanov, Professor of History, Chair of Social Science Department, Director of Institute of Russian language, History and Culture, Lyndon State College, Lyndonville, VTThe demonstration in Moscow on December 10 is a good example of the gradual development of Russian civil society, as well as the fact that the Russian government finally is learning the word “tolerance.” Boris Yeltsin’s regime, which was so popular in the West and employed many of today’s opposition leaders (Boris Nemtsov, Mikhail Kasyanov) was much less tolerant. In other words, Vladimir Putin certainly won the first round of his presidential campaign. He showed the country that he is not afraid of such meetings and demonstrations. His decision to have the “call-in” with the country on December 15 is equally wise. The rally itself was quite interesting. It brought together a wide spectrum of political forces, but it was dominated by the nationalists and the leftists. The official results of the election confirm that the latter represent the real character of contemporary Russian opposition. This diversity has strong and weak aspects. Strong because it adds legitimacy and weak because people that came to this rally will never work together outside of it and will never agree on anything else.Without any doubt the Russian people have the right to protest regardless of how their party performed in the election. However, the ultimatum passed to the Kremlin at the meeting is a different story and, of course, it is not going to be implemented. No leaders of the four major political parties were present at the protest. I am also quite sure that none of the parties that secured seats in the State Duma will reject their mandates, insist on a new election or support the proposal to change the law on political parties. Consequently, the chances of a new election are slim, and other points of the ultimatum will soon be of interest only to Eduard Limonov, Boris Nemtsov, Sergei Udaltsov, Evgeniya Chirikova and other “professional revolutionaries” in Russia.It is well-known that revolutions are usually made in capitals. However, the presidential election will be held not only in Moscow and St. Petersburg, but in all of Russia, where more realistic people will not wish to lose the country the second time in just 20 years. Twenty years ago the Soviet Union was destroyed by its elite, including Mikhail Gorbachev, who is demanding new elections today. Self-annihilation is threatening the Russian Federation today, and hopefully the Russian people understand that.At the same time, Vladimir Putin must learn from these events to correct his course. Mikhail Prokhorov’s participation in the presidential election is an excellent idea. If Prokhorov performs successfully and the so-called “new urban middle class” is real, consolidated and electorally active, the “liberal oligarch” may become the next prime minister instead of Dmitry Medvedev, who is out of fashion among liberals now. However, in my opinion, it is not very likely, and in March we will probably witness another proof of socialist-communist leaning in the country, despite the obviously uncharismatic and even unattractive leadership on this part of the political spectrum. Changes in Russia are because of the general failure of the post-Soviet capitalist experiment in the country, and more people who begin to understand it are intuitively turning to the left.From here we may see a few purely hypothetical but still possible scenarios of the future. Let’s begin with an “unrealistic” but the most dangerous scenario: Russian “professional revolutionaries,” inspired by some Western governments, form the “committee of national salvation” and it paralyses the country with non-stop demonstrations, protests and strikes; blood is spilled on the streets of Moscow and several other cities. The “revolutionaries” announce that the results of the election on December 4 are void and a new election is called in March 2012. Putin is isolated from the government and the vertical of power is collapsing, the country is sliding into the chaos known to people who lived through the end of the Soviet Union. Ethnic republics, such as Tatarstan, Bashkortostan and all of the Northern Caucasus, where United Russia won a majority of votes, announce their independence from Moscow, but gradually slide into civil war with the “Islamists.” Some ethnically Russian provinces, rich in mineral resources, do not recognize the authority of the “revolutionary committee” and announce their sovereignty. Foreign capital and rich Russians flee the country, the economy collapses and inflation spirals out of control. Elections in the spring divide the State Duma between nationalists and leftists, who immediately begin to fight among themselves and the country continues to exist only on maps printed before 2011. Western countries call it the triumph of democracy and award the “revolutionaries” the Noble Peace Prize and permanent residence in London and Paris. If you do not think that this is possible, look at Gorbachev and at Iraq and Libya today.The realistic scenario is as follows: the sixth Duma will go in session on December 21 with all four major parties in it. None of the parties represented in the State Duma will ever mention any demands made at the meeting on December 10 in their activities. After December 24 the protests will lose their energy and things will gradually calm down over the holiday season. However, anti-Putin rhetoric, sponsored by the West, will intensify again closer to the presidential election in March 2012. The situation may again become unpredictable. There will be a high possibility of terrorist attacks and other man-made critical situations that will test the ability of the government to act decisively and target Putin as a leader. However, Putin will win the election and will have to decide on the new paradigm of his presidency for the following six years. If he chooses to continue the “liberal course” and Mikhail Prokhorov becomes the new prime minister, a social explosion may happen in the next few years or as soon as truly popular leaders appear on the left who are able to consolidate the largest part of the political spectrum in Russia. If Putin decides to go “left” after the election by himself, we may see a two party system representing the interests of the majority of the people, with really competitive and fair elections.Edward Lozansky, President, American University in Moscow and the United States-Russia Forum in Washington, DCLet us try to leave emotions aside and look at the hard facts. There was some cheating and rule violations during the recent Duma elections, and therefore the people’s anger over this was well justified. However, the final results did correspond to the most reliable polls within the margin of error, both on the eve of the elections and at the exit polls. Actually, some of these polls predicted an even higher share of votes for United Russia. The people’s activism in and after the election is a welcome sign of Russia’s maturing democracy, and if the opposition continues to play by the rules and within the framework of the law, there is a good chance that in the not-so-distant future Russia will make substantial headway in this direction. Unfortunately, there are strong indications that this democratization process may result in the strengthening of the left, rather than the pro-Western right, and if the United States has any leverage there at all, it is unwisely using it to undermine the very political forces that it is anxious to support.Hillary Clinton’s involvement in the Russian elections is the most recent striking example of this poorly designed policy. It does not take a brilliant political strategist to see that it is not the Duma composition or even a fair election process that Clinton and some other folks in Washington care about. They do not want Putin in the Kremlin, and are prepared to use so-called “soft power,” including informational warfare and even direct financial investments, to undermine his chances of reelection. It was none other than Vice President Joseph Biden who, on a recent trip to Moscow, strongly advised Putin not to run. One would assume that if Putin had any doubts about his future plans, Biden’s unsolicited advice merely reinforced his decision to run. As it transpired, the U.S. taxpayers’ money is being used not only to support Russian organizations critical of the Kremlin, but to directly reward all those who can present any case of election fraud. In other words, there is a financial incentive to look for these cases, and who can guarantee that some of these violations have not been trumped up to get the reward? Even if we assume that all of the stringers were perfectly honest, this dubious practice, plus U.S. media hysteria, including the Fox News footage of the most violent Greek riots presented as taking place in Russia, are strong indicators that a few hot heads would love to see something resembling a color revolution or “Arab spring” in Moscow.Do we need that, and is it in the interests of the United States?If the highly questionable results of the previous color revolutions in Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine and the Middle East are anything to go by, they did little to benefit America and the West. Georgia almost got us in a war with Russia, and still keeps trying to do that (bravo to Senator Rand Paul who stopped his colleague Marco Rubio from sneaking Georgia into NATO through the back door). Ukraine is in a terrible mess largely created by the Orange leaders; Kyrgyzstan keeps threatening to have the U.S. military base in Manas removed; and Arab revolutions brought radical Islamists to power.God forbid a color revolution should erupt in Russia! It will have a disastrous effect not only on the Russian people, but to a large degree on the United States as well. The most optimistic outcome of this revolution will be a communist takeover, and if worse comes to worst, we’ll get a so called red-brown coalition of communists and nationalists. Is this what we want? One can criticize Putin non-stop around the clock, but let us face it: he was the man who extended a hand to America after September 11, but was pretty unwisely rebuffed by George Bush.Presently, Russia is playing a key role for the U.S. military by providing safe supply routes for the American and NATO troops in Afghanistan. This role has now become essential in view of the full blockade by Pakistan, America’s supposed ally. Without Russian cooperation, the West will not be able to stop Iran from going ahead with its nuclear weapons program and, most importantly, U.S. efforts to keep China’s growing economic and military potential in check will come to naught if Russia and China join forces. And they certainly will if the color revolutionists have their way.Andrei P. Tsygankov, Professor, International Relations/Political Science, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA A 27 percent exit poll result for United Russia seems like an exaggeration from the other side. Grigory Yavlinsky even claimed that Yabloko won the elections. Moscow liberals love to speak on behalf of the whole country, even though the capital is not the whole of Russia. It would take a Soviet-like administrative machine to falsify elections for more than 20 percent. Russian liberals may need to elect a different population to have their dreams come true. That said, there is no question that Russia is changing. People are increasingly dissatisfied with the accomplishments of the Putin era, which include state consolidation, economic recovery, the end of the war in Chechnya and revival of Russia’s international status. The system proved unable to deliver what many now expect – a greater openness, the rule of law, and a renewed economic confidence. Indeed, the protesters don’t merely challenge the results of the elections; they condemn the system itself and its new stage of stagnation. Does it mean that Russia is replicating the Middle East transformations? And, if so, is Russia headed toward an Egypt-like peaceful uprising or a Lybia-style military confrontation? The answer very much depends on the Russian authorities and their actions. While Medvedev doesn’t have a strong network of social supporters, Putin retains support of the middle part of Russia, ethnic autonomies, and a good part of the army, police, and security services. However, he faces a difficult balancing act and must tread carefully to alleviate growing political pressures and preserve social peace.It is important to understand that the increasingly dissatisfied middle class is only one source of these pressures. The city-based middle class is an engine of change – from perestroika to the colored revolutions and the “Arab Spring” – yet it rarely carries out its actions entirely on its own. Powerful elites frequently find a way to exploit middle class movements for their interests, as it was with the nomenklatura revolution that ended the Soviet Union, or Islamists that are taking advantage of the changes in the Middle East.For preventing further destabilization, it is necessary to order the investigation of notorious cases of electoral fraud and mobilize mass supporters of orderly, rather than revolutionary, change. It is also important to engage with powerful business elites that may be behind the protesters. Giving stakes to dissatisfied elites and the middle class, while preserving control and isolating the revolutionaries, may become the ultimate test of Putin’s political skills. If he fails this test, as Mikhail Gorbachev and Hosni Mubarak did, the electoral revolution may become a prelude to a prolonged politicization with unpredictable consequences for Russia and for Putin himself.Professor Nicolai N. Petro, Department of Political Science, Washburn Hall, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RII am afraid that I have to disagree with the conventional wisdom. Nationwide exit polls by the Foundation for Public Opinion and VTsIOM, as reported by The Christian Science Monitor and CBS News, were very close to the final results. Such a close correspondence is typically seen as conclusive evidence for the reliability of the overall vote tally, just as the discrepancy between the two was taken as evidence of fraud in Ukraine in 2004.The incomplete tallies in Moscow, and reporting errors in Rostov, where the tableaus put up on television on one channel briefly showed results that added up to 146 percent, are understandably favored by conspiracy theorists, but are probably best explained by human error. Extrapolating the same results nationwide, or even Moscow-wide, would require attributing such a high degree of organizational finesse to United Russia that one would think it could have come up with a better result.As for the “evidence” posted on YouTube, in the vast majority of videos it is hard to tell what exactly is being shown. Certainly nothing that might meet the standard of legal evidence seems to have been caught on camera, except perhaps for some post factum statements by electoral observers that behavior at this or that polling stations struck them as suspicious.I certainly hope that those with real grievances will file them in the courts, which in the past have proven quite willing to overturn the results when evidence of corrupt practices has been presented. For now such evidence seems remarkably slim. The major opposition parties all say they are still gathering evidence, but none have indicated whether or not they will file suits. How then can one explain these unsurprising results?? First, like all “catch-all” parties, United Russia has a broader base than parties that appeal to a narrow segment of the electorate. For this very reason, however, it is also more prone to defections and “protest voting.”Parties of this type, like the UMP in France, do much better during times of crisis, when the party can make national unity its rallying cry. But Russia has handled the economic crisis of 2009 with exceptional skill and emerged with a budget surplus this year. That means more money for social programs and investment projects. United Russia is thus a victim of its own success. As the most pressing issues of salary and jobs recede, people are more willing to upset the status quo, ever so slightly, to have their less pressing concerns raised in the parliament.What are these concerns? Oddly enough, they involve the never-ending carousel of reforms: pensions, military, police, courts, even the political system—in sum, all of United Russia’s much publicized “modernization” agenda. People are tired of being told that they need to keep moving, like lemmings, toward some unspecified and unattainable goal. Leading the rebellion is the rising middle class, which worries that modernization will cost them more than it will benefit them. In sum, this is a conservative protest vote. The social agenda of the left won, while the competitive agenda of liberals, a group which happens to include Medvedev and United Russia, lost.How will this affect the March vote for president of Russia?? I happen to believe that the Russian electorate is very perceptive when it comes to identifying who will actually defend its interests. As a result, if Putin makes his electoral campaign about defending the gains that the less fortunate have made over the past decade, I suspect that he will have a relatively easy time being reelected.Ira Straus, U.S. Coordinator, Committee on Russia in NATO, Washington, DC"A too forward retention of custom is itself a turbulent thing," Francis Bacon once said. Putin spoke years ago of managing the system "manually," until a time came which was fit for transfer to automatic democratic mechanisms. His timeframe has kept growing longer. It turns out the time has passed him by. The system has been held over too far forward. It is itself becoming a source of turbulence.A smooth gradual transition will be more difficult now. But more delays will only make the ride still bumpier. And riskier.The current decay of stability vindicates the moderate wing of Putinists, who have said that the Putin stabilization system made sense only as a transitional phase, and needs to recognize that it has already served its purpose and move toward a re-democratization on the basis of the stabilization.The instability of the Yeltsin era was always overstated; the actual Putin stabilization was based on more fundamental stabilizations accomplished in the Yeltsin years, when the main risks of Russia's disintegration were already overcome. A satisfactory stability on the main points was a settled achievement by 2001. By 2002 to 2003, the failure to begin an enhancement of the democratic legitimizing element in the system – and the deepening of the authoritarian element instead – was already becoming a destabilizing factor.An “Arab Spring” is impossible in Moscow, because most Russians are not Arabs or Muslims. An “Orange Evolution” is an entirely different matter. It is what the regime needs for re-stabilization.Dick Krickus, distinguished professor emeritus at the University of Mary Washington, former H.L. Oppenheimer Chair for Warfighting Strategy at the U.S. Marine Corps University, Washington, DCHistorians will no doubt cite December 10, 2011 as a pivotal point in modern Russian history; it is the day when real politics began to appear in a society that has suffered under the jack-boot of autocracy for centuries. By now, details pertaining to the massive 40,000-plus turnout of mostly middle-class Russians in Moscow and smaller gatherings in St. Petersburg and other cities have been digested by even casual followers of Russian affairs. Going forward, the big question is “what will happen next?” Specifically, how will the emboldened reformers build a movement that has a network of leaders and activists capable of maintaining its momentum and consolidating and expanding upon it membership?Toward this end, a number of observations leap to mind in conducting a top-down, bottom-up strategy that will be energized by next March’s presidential election. Firstly, is it necessary to create a narrative that has detailed programs and broad appeal. The people who have taken to the streets must develop a storyline that provides potential supporters with concrete policy options that address public grievances. Secularists in Egypt have noted that they did not do as well as their reactionary, sectarian opponents in recent elections because they did not provide the voters with a well-articulated program for change. In Russia’s case that means a message or a story-line that shows potential supporters what next steps are required to reach the goal they all desire – a modern pluralistic Russia that addresses the needs of everyone.Secondly, the movement should be consolidated through a series of actions. In the near term, actions must be taken that focus upon the activists that already have taken to the streets and like-minded people who fit their demographics: patriotic educated young people and older members of society who have obtained middle class status. Also likeminded individuals who heretofore have remained on the sidelines, but have been inspired by December 10 and emboldened by the Kremlin’s shaky reaction to it, must be courted as well. Among this group are members of the governing regime that are having second thoughts about the wisdom of clinging to the status quo.To reach out to a wider audience, the movement must continue to use whatever media outlets are available to them, such as the Internet and other hi-tech implements, but they also must exploit more traditional means of communication to attract older and less privileged members of society – the kind of folks that the elite in Moscow and other big cities do not interact with on a customary basis.Thirdly, a network of leaders and grass roots activists should be developed. In keeping with the profile of mass movements, leaders emerge as events unfold, but at some point a formal chain of command must be established along an organizational framework. The March presidential election provides a concrete goal that can energize the movement and help it obtain these objectives. What’s more, in backing a candidate, the movement may thrust forward a collection of leaders – not necessarily the candidate of their choice, but individuals who have demonstrated by their actions that they have leadership qualities – and create a nationwide organizational framework that will endure after the election is over.Lastly, it is essential to reach out to the provinces. One of the major failings of progressive parties in Europe and the United States has been their failure to attract ordinary working people who, unlike the educated elite, have been victims of globalization and are profoundly concerned about their economic welfare. Living in geographical and psychological “gated communities,” the movement activists rarely interact with fellow citizens that do not have a university degree or enjoy the advantages that the privileged middle class takes for granted. That means the activists in Moscow and St. Petersburg must reach out to common folk that reside in the vast Russian hinterland who are disgruntled but powerless. Access to these people is possible through community leaders in provincial cities who have been fighting corrupt local authorities and grasping oligarchs on their own. Their communities could win many of these confrontations if they had access to modest funding and organizational and legal assistance available in Russia’s major urban centers. These provincial leaders know how to communicate with the people with whom they live and work, and they should not be ignored.Skeptics rightly point out that the road ahead will be difficult and the movement will be confronted with internal and external challenges to its integrity. It will not achieve all of its near term objectives, like compelling the Kremlin to scrap the election results and provide for a new one. Also, while the Putin-Medvedev tandem has thrown under the bus associates like Duma Chairman Boris Gryzlov, they also have indicated that they may resort to old tried and true tactics of intimidation. Note Putin’s recent TV question and answer session, where he characterized the protestors as people “who have Russian passports but who act in the interests of different states and are funded with foreign money.” These words are hardly new ones, but are ominous at a time when it would appear that more conciliatory rhetoric is in order.Finally, will the Kremlin allow a real presidential opponent to challenge Putin? Those among the ruling elite that say “no” must accept the fact that this time, a new aroused populace representing the best and brightest will not quietly fade into the background, but demand a free and fair election (among other things, they may sponsor a series of debates that allows all major presidential candidates the opportunity to present their views to the public). They have tasted their power and have attracted to their cause individuals who enjoy privileged positions in Russian society, in commercial and cultural affairs and even in the government. Thus far, the protesters have been peaceful and have demonstrated that they are prepared to work toward gradual but real change in Russian politics. They are practical, patriotic people who ultimately will determine the fate of Russia. To deny them any hope of creating a Russian political system that approaches that of a normal European polity is to give license to people who may have a different, less peaceful agenda. In sum, those individuals who occupy dark corners of Russian society and who have no affiliation with foreigners in any form but are unaccustomed to resolve disputes peacefully.Anthony T. Salvia, Special Advisor to the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs in the Reagan Administration, Washington, DCI served as an official observer to the State Duma elections on December 4. Everything I saw at the ten polling stations I visited in Yekaterinburg was above board, and actually quite impressive. I refer to the technology used, the plethora of observers from the main political parties and foreign countries on hand everywhere, the scrupulousness with which the vote was counted, the evident pride so many took in exercising the important civic function of voting. I was moved when a poll worker announced to the crowd at the polling station, "We have a first-time voter," and the entire throng broke into applause. The voter, who had just turned 18, smiled broadly and rather sheepishly. It was one of those charming, spontaneous, humanly affecting moments Russian life abounds in. Of course I cannot vouch for what I did not see. In Siberian Yekaterinburg, I was far from the scene where much of the alleged vote fraud is said to have taken place. So far, I have not seen any reports that would indicate that fraud took place on such a scale as to significantly alter the results. Based on all available evidence, on December 4, for the first time in Russian history, a ruling party was rebuked at the polls, effectively losing the election. A significant loss of support for United Russia was entirely predictable; nevertheless, the government allowed a largely free (though clearly imperfect) process to proceed. When it takes office, the new State Duma will approximate to the real shape of public opinion, and will serve as a legitimate forum for debate and political action.United Russia could have done what our Democrats did in 1960 when they stole the presidential election outright. To its credit, it did not. Or, it could have reported a result of 50.2 percent, as opposed to 49.7 percent, and retained its absolute majority. Who would have contradicted it, and on what basis? As Moscow-based financier Eric Kraus has observed, Putin is about as neo-Soviet as he is Hindu. Though not without flaws, he has served Russia well, not least by sticking up for the national interest. He has thwarted Washington's efforts to isolate and encircle the nation by blocking its schemes in Ukraine and the Caucasus, and by building the North Sea pipeline from Russia to Germany, bypassing Poland.When he was president from 2000 to 2008, as Kraus points out, the Russian economy grew by an average of 7.5 percent per year (even now, amidst economic recession throughout the West, Russia is growing at the enviable rate of four percent per year). In the same time period, Russia achieved foreign exchange reserves of $600 billion, a 15-fold increase in pensions, sharply decreased poverty, demographic stabilization, unprecedented political stability and the world's best performing debt and equity markets. Upon assuming the presidency, Putin moved swiftly to liquidate the nation's sovereign debt, and build up its gold reserves, prescient policies that have already helped the country to avoid the worst of the turbulence rocking the world economy.? The main failing of Putin in power has been crafting a system that responds to the real needs and concerns of society – coming to grips with corruption in the educational system, the militia and traffic police, controlling the cost of utilities, improving Moscow traffic, etc. Although many of the people who demonstrated against Putin last Saturday in Moscow were communists and Russian nationalists (who also have a right to be heard), many were members of the urban middle class that has grown markedly over the past 12 years, in no small measure because of Putin's policy leadership. The ideal outcome of the present state of affairs would be for more popular participation in domestic policy through newly transparent and open political institutions, while the Russian president retains control of foreign policy and national security affairs. What Russia should not do is to listen to Hillary Clinton, who aims to impose her brand of secular materialist ideology (styled "progressive") on a nation still reeling from 70 years of communism, and to reduce Russia to the status of a nominally independent satellite.Greater political transparency is called for, but then so is Putin (still).Vladimir Belaeff, President, Global Society Institute, San Francisco, CAThe results of the Duma elections and the claims of vote fraud are a wake-up call for the ruling party in Russia. The primary beneficiaries of United Russia’s electoral decline are the communists, and this should worry all who favor the development of democracy in Russia. It is not clear whether systematic and non-partisan demographic analyses of voter turnout were done on election day, so we cannot yet determine with clarity and precision whether the losses by United Russia were due to no-shows from what is that party’s electoral base, or whether a genuine shift in preferences is evident. Electorates are notoriously fickle – the darling (or the bogeyman) of the voters on any given voting day may (and has) become the opposite one month later. Those in the opposition in Russia who are demanding a re-vote of the Duma elections should be mindful that a second visit to the polls might actually cancel their current gains – even in the most honest circumstances. Such is the nature of democracy.Peaceful rallies for honest elections are a healthy exercise. It is commendable that the authorities are exercising the obligatory correctness regarding peaceful political expression. Given the motley character of the core participants (monarchists, skinheads, national-bolsheviks, anarchists jointly with pro-Western liberals) there is a concern about the direction in which these meetings will evolve. There appears a tendency by some of the more prominent participants to “highjack” the assembly in directions that these individuals prefer, but crowds of people are inherently unstable and may disperse as easily as they assembled, if the participants disagree with being channeled in any specific direction.One should also remember that Russia is still very much in transition from 70 years of single party rule with a totalitarian ideology to a modern civil society. It will take two or three generations (meaning decades of time) of peaceful political and social progress to undo the damages done to the Russian body politic in the 20th century.Those who imagine that the protests against vote rigging are a germinating “Arab Spring” in Russia do not seem to clearly understand the nature of the “Arab Spring” (which, by the way, now spans several seasons and will result in the ascendancy of religious fundamentalism and social regression in the affected Arab countries. Libya and Syria are in effect teetering on the edge of civil war). The sources of the “Arab Spring” are very specific to the structure and dynamics of Arab societies; these upheavals are a derivation of a wave of resurgent Islamic radicalism. The circumstances and political dynamics in Russia are very different.Russia’s accession to WTO – ‘a fair deal’?: 18 December, 2011, 22:06Edited: 18 December, 2011, 22:43 WTO membership will seriously hit a number of uncompetitive industries in Russia, such as agriculture and automobiles, as well as light industry and machine manufacturing. But EU trade commissioner, Karel de Gucht, has told RT it was a fair deal.“These were, I believe, fair negotiations,” he said. “I think it is a fair deal. And once you have concluded a deal, you should stop discussing the content of the deal.”De Gucht does not agree with the widespread opinion that Russia made too many concessions to get that seat in the WTO. “You have to negotiate with your own interest in mind, but also having in mind that the other party also needs to find its own interest in the negotiation,” he said.The concessions made today in the agriculture and automotive sectors will benefit the modernization of the industries in the long term, he believes.“There is a completely new set of rules with respect to sanitary norms for foods,” he said. “It is also very important what we have concluded with respect to the automotive sector, where Russia had been taking unilateral measures. And now we have come to a compromise on these.”“I believe that this agreement we have made will result in a modern automotive industry,” he added.Russia’s local energy market will also suffer as energy prices in Russia are currently much lower than in the EU, and that imbalance must be resolved under the agreement. “[Russia] will have to go to market prices over time,” he admitted. “Once you are a member of the WTO, you have to go to market prices and you cannot have the double-pricing.”An advantage Karel de Gucht does see for Russia is that it will be easier to attract more foreign capital into the economy: “[Russia’s] accession to the WTO will give [investors] assurance that they are working in a legal environment that is more transparent than it was before.”He expects Russia’s trade turnover with the EU to rise “considerably,” but not necessarily by the amazing 300 per cent China showed after becoming a member of the WTO.“Russia’s economy is focused on a much more limited number of sectors,” De Gucht said. “I think it will depend on Russia which direction they take. And if Russians take the direction of modernizing their economy, of being involved also in new sectors, then probably the agreement to get into the WTO will be more fruitful to them – but that is up to them.”Russia's WTO accession to bring benefits, reform 11:30:54MOSCOW, Dec. 19 (Xinhua) -- When Russia's formal accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) was finally approved last Friday in Geneva, Russian Economic Development and Trade Minister Elvira Nabiullina said there will be no losers in the win-win game.Analysts generally believe everyone -- Russia, its trade partners, the WTO and the world economy at large -- is going to benefit from Russia's membership in the long run, but for some Russian industrial sectors tangible benefits would come only after bitter reforms and tough competitions that may last for several years.BENEFITS TANGIBLEAfter the announcement of Russia's WTO accession, Nabiullina told a news conference that the chemical and transport industries would be the biggest winners.She also said Russian consumers would benefit from increased competition from other WTO members, such as better-quality goods and lower prices.More importantly, in the steel and fuel sectors Russia will benefit instantly from recourse to WTO anti-dumping procedures, said Andrei Neshchadin, deputy director of Moscow's Innovative Economics Institution."Foreign steel producers, especially the U.S. and Indian ones, have long been accusing Russia of unfair competition at dumping prices. After Russia becomes a WTO member, these complaints would be shut automatically. The same rule applies to the fuel sectors," the economist told Xinhua.Nabiullina estimated that the Russian industry, in general, could benefit by some 2 billion U.S. dollars a year from an end to discrimination against Russian exports.For Russia's trade partners, Russia's membership in WTO would also bring benefits.It could create a more stable framework for doing business with the 1.9-trillion-dollar oil-rich economy, because foreign investors could have more confidence due to Russia's compliance with the same international trade rules, said experts.Kirill Dmitriev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund, said the WTO membership would raise Russian growth by 10 percent over the next five years and could even help provide a solution to the European financial crisis, as it will foster more free trade and cross-border investment in Europe.EU trade officials predicted that Russia's WTO membership is expected to promote EU exports by some 4 billion euros (about 5.2 billion U.S. dollars) a year.REFORMS INEVITABLEHowever, for some other Russian industries, WTO membership brings instant pain and inevitable reforms.After the WTO accession, Russia will have to gradually lower its average tariff ceiling to 7.8 percent from its current 10 percent, with the agricultural tariff down from 13.2 percent to 10.8 percent and the industrial products' tariff slipping from 9.5 percent to 7.3 percent.Some industry experts worried that lowering trade barriers will hurt Russia's agricultural sector and make it tough for manufacturers in car and aviation industries to compete with their foreign counterparts.Oleg Bogomolov, a member of the Russian Academy of Science, said agriculture would be under most serious threat."Agricultural products in Russia are very expensive due to climate circumstances. Even now, imported foods are cheaper than those produced in Russia. If the fuel prices rise even higher, Russian farmers could not survive," he said.For survival, Russian economy must resolve its basic and greatest problem: the expenses."The cost of production makes Russian goods and services uncompetitive. This is especially crucial for car industry and agriculture," said Leonid Grigoriev, a professor from the High School of Economics.Therefore, experts believed that Russia has to speed up its economic diversification and technological innovation, to efficiently adjust its economy and laws to meet the WTO requirements.Neshchadin, an expert from the Innovative Economics Institution, noted the transitional period is luckily long enough for Russian economy."The car and plane industries will enjoy the longest tariff protection period with seven years. So nearly any industry has plenty of time to implement the structural changes and adjustments to work in the open markets successfully, with no government protection," he said.Meanwhile, the expert added he sees no reason for panic over changes, even in the most-worried car industry."The car industry has already been transformed even before Russia joins the WTO thanks to the accession talks," Neshchadin said, "Now, domestically produced cheap cars virtually have no competitors in their price niche.""And in the higher price segment, the cars produced in Russia under foreign logos have already occupied their market segments quite comfortably. So (Russian cheap cars) Lada is not going to die," he said. Dmitry Rogozin: Russian Nationalist? Or Secret Advocate for American Taxpayers? 18, 2011Is Dmitry Rogozin a secret agent of a clandestine Tea Party/Occupy Wall Street alliance, infiltrated into the halls of NATO?Mr. Rogozin is Russia’s Ambassador to NATO. By day, he is known as a vocal, articulate advocate of Russian national interests. But, by night, is he a secret advocate of the interests of American taxpayers?At a Tea Party debate on Nov. 17, Republican presidential candidates faced the question: “The US spends about $2 billion a week in Afghanistan; can American afford it?” Candidate after candidate agreed with Rick Perry, the governor of Texas, who said: “Bring our young men and women home.”Coincidentally, three days later, I was on vacation in New York City. I found the same “bring the troops home” sentiment among signs at the Occupy Wall Street gathering in lower Manhattan.In the middle, a number of polls indicate that about two-thirds of Americans want a rapid drawdown from Afghanistan.Meanwhile, the United States completed it war mission in Iraq on Sunday. The media calculated the nine-year bill at nearly $1 trillion. Two days earlier, the U.S. Congress narrowly averted shutting down the federal government in another fight over budget cuts. Now, as unemployment benefits dry up across America, congressmen are desperately searching for new sources of money.Into this environment, Rogozin, Russia’s NATO ambassador, threw a bombshell: threatening in remarks to Russian reporters to shut down the American military supply line to Afghanistan. Mr. Rogozin knew he would have the U.S. over a barrel because Pakistan closed NATO’s land-based supply routes in late November.But Ariel Cohen, a Heritage Foundation research fellow, spelled out for Russia the consequences in an essay:“Rogozin forgets that if the U.S. contingent in Afghanistan is trapped or leaves in haste, the Russian troops may need to fight the Taliban on the Tajik border. This will be a disaster for a country that was defeated in Afghanistan in the 1980s. Russia does not have the resources, personnel, or credible allies for such an open-ended engagement.”Rogozin floated the threat as a way to push the US to drop construction of a defense system in Eastern Europe designed to knock out one or two missiles fired from Iran. Moscow sees this as ultimately destabilizing a world balance of power, which is predicated on its possession of roughly 1,300 missiles and about 3,500 nuclear warheads.Rogozin failed to realize that if he pushed the Americans on Afghanistan, he was pushing on an open door.Given the needed budgetary cuts and the low public support for the war, many powerful people in Washington would be happy to hand off to the Kremlin all or part of the $2 billion a week Afghan bill.Evidently, that reality penetrated the thick walls of the Kremlin. Someone sat on Rogozin. Now, he says Russian reporters took his threat “out of context.”After the failure of his Afghan trial balloon, Rogozin now is embarking on a new project. He has just joined the leadership of the campaign to elect Vladimir Putin president.December 18, 2011Russian Orthodox Church Asserts Role in Civil Society SOPHIA KISHKOVSKYMOSCOW — Just over 20 years ago, any religious education outside church walls was still banned in the Soviet Union. Today, churches are being built on state university campuses, theology departments have opened around Russia, and the Russian Orthodox Church has built its own educational network with international contacts and even become something of a model for the secular system. Still, state universities struggle on many levels to integrate into the international system; the Bologna Process, an agreement streamlining higher-education standards across Europe, has upset many Russian academics who contend that it undermines the achievements of the Soviet system, where a standard specialist degree required five years of study. But the Russian Orthodox Church, which started building its education system virtually from scratch in the post-Soviet era, has applied international standards from the outset, said Archimandrite Cyril Hovorun, deputy chairman of the church’s education committee. Speaking of the state education system, Father Hovorun said, “It is more concerned about finding compromises between the old Soviet system and the new European standards.” At the same time, the church is proposing its vision of educational reform. “Education is not a personal matter but a sphere of public life on which the existence of society and the state depend,” Patriarch Kirill I, the church’s leader, said in September in a speech at Voronezh State University. “It is the backbone of the existence of society, and that’s why the transfer of education exclusively into the sphere of rendering of market services is, in my view, a big mistake.” Yulia Rehbinder, 30, who received a degree in social pedagogy this year from St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University, which was founded in Moscow in 1992 as a theological institute, said she had chosen the university because she thought it offered a more sophisticated humanities program than state universities. It received state accreditation as a university in 2004. “In Soviet times, everything connected with Christianity, its history and culture, was purposely removed from humanitarian education,” said Ms. Rehbinder, who is now working with orphans and doing graduate research on Russian émigré teaching methods in France. “As a result, it ended up that specialists couldn’t understand the essence of works of art, of many historical events, or the motives of human actions, since a Christian worldview was alien to them.” While the church has helped create over 30 theology faculties at secular state universities, Father Hovorun said, the state education authorities still refuse to recognize theology as a stand-alone doctoral-degree subject. Archpriest Vladimir Vorobiev, rector of St. Tikhon’s, told Pravoslavie i mir, an Orthodox news Web site, that he objected to the state authorities’ refusal to recognize theology as a social science at the doctorate level. He asserts that some people in high levels of Russian academia are still influenced by a Soviet mind-set that cannot accept a social “science about God.” “In Europe, they would only laugh at the phrases we have heard here about theology not being a science,” Father Vorobiev said. “To them, it’s the equivalent of saying that math is not a science.” But while the Orthodox Church has become an increasingly powerful presence in Russia, speaking out on morality, economics, international relations, and most recently the Russian elections, critics say it has failed to adequately fill a post-Soviet ideological and moral vacuum. The attempt to unite the church’s ideological and practical potential is illustrated vividly at the Russian State Social University. The university has more than 100,000 students on campuses across Russia and a branch in Kyrgyzstan. Last June, its central Moscow campus, hosted an anti-abortion conference that drew American activists. Student volunteers wore anti-abortion T-shirts and distributed anti-abortion literature. The university, where smoking is banned, encourages student marriages and babies, and students are unusually polite. The centerpiece of the campus, which used to be an institute of Marxism-Leninism, is the Church of the Fyodorovskaya Icon of the Mother of God. It was consecrated in 2006 after much debate on whether it was appropriate to build an Orthodox church in the center of the campus, said Vasily Zhukov, who is rector of the university and said all of its campuses also had prayer rooms for Muslims and other non-Orthodox students. The construction or restoration of churches on university campuses has become such a trend that there is now an association of university churches in Russia. Yaroslav Skvortsov, chairman of the department of international journalism at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations, is co-chairman of the association. While the study of church history is an elective, Mr. Skvortsov said he regarded it as essential for better relations among Russians and others. “A true understanding of this Orthodox component of state diplomatic service is what will without a doubt help our future diplomats to have a proper sense of themselves,” he said. Cooperation with the Russian Orthodox Church, Mr. Zhukov said, is a practical decision to create a moral foundation for students. “We are interested in allies,” he said, “not in religious obscurantism, not in the idealization of the church as such, not in the use of force to bring a person to church. We don’t need any of this. But we need the church as a bearer of huge knowledge.” He added, “We are located on a spot that used to be a theoretical focal point of aggressive atheism.” In October, Mr. Zhukov was honored for his work in academia and for the church by Metropolitan Hilarion, chairman of the Department of External Church relations, who has a doctorate from the University of Oxford and has been promoting ties between the two sectors. Still, some Russian Orthodox leaders and commentators report growing alienation among student-age youths from the church and resentment that the religion is being forced on them. What’s more, several years ago, a number of prominent Russian scientists accused the church in an open letter of imposing ignorance and clerical rule on Russian society. But Archpriest Vladimir Shmaliy, a theologian and vice rector of the Saints Cyril and Methodius Postgraduate and Doctoral School of the Russian Orthodox Church, said a growing dialogue between the church and academia in fields like philosophy and biology had become an example of civil society in Russia. The church and the Higher School of Economics, Russia’s most Western-style state university, will soon sign an agreement that will include cooperation of their philosophy and history departments, said Sergey Roshchin, vice rector and professor at the school. “Of course there are many problems in the relations between church and society, church and the state,” he said. “But this is a subject for expert dialogue that includes academia as well.” Russia re-embraces a cold war — in the North 17, 2011Paul Watson MURMANSK, Russia— In the noonday twilight, as dockworkers squint through the gloom to move mountainous heaps of coal bound for Europe, the hum of Arctic power is unmistakable.The stevedores labour in the damp cold, 200 kilometres north of the Arctic Circle, part of the vanguard leading Russia’s latest push to build its future on the rich resources of the Far North.Grab buckets with massive steel jaws, dangling from yellow cranes several storeys high, chomp at mounds of coal, iron ore pellets and other bulk cargo steadily replenished by a stream of trains from the south. And this is a slow winter’s day.Russians stopped wondering about whether to develop the Arctic generations ago. The only question now is, how fast can progress march?The Kremlin has declared the Arctic critical to the country’s 21st-century economy and national security. And it is risking billions on a strategy to reverse years of neglect and decline in its Far North.A once-utopian vision of the north heavy on Soviet control has given way to a pragmatic view that science and technology, driven by political will and business savvy, can re-energize a slowing economy.“Strategically, the Arctic is Russia’s future — no doubt about that,” said Anton Vasiliev, Russia’s ambassador-at-large for Arctic issues.In 2007, Prime Minister Stephen Harper defined what’s at stake in the competition to maintain control of Canada’s Arctic when he declared: “Canada has a choice when it comes to defending our sovereignty over the Arctic. We either use it or lose it. And make no mistake, this government intends to use it.”The two countries share at least three-quarters of the circumpolar Arctic, and standing on the Russian side of the vast expanse, the chasm between rhetoric and reality is startling.About 4 million people live in the circumpolar Arctic. Half are Russians, and some 300,000 of them live in Murmansk.Another 175,000 live in Norilsk, built by 300,000 prisoners of Soviet gulags from the mid-1930s until the death of dictator Josef Stalin in 1953. The punishing slave labour, bitter Arctic cold and starvation killed more than 16,000 people during those dark years.With more than a third of the world’s nickel reserves, and some 40 per cent of its platinum, Norilsk still thrives as a mining centre.Mikhail Prokhorov, the billionaire owner of the NBA’s New Jersey Nets who is challenging current Prime Minster Vladimir Putin for the presidency in March, ran Norilsk Nickel until 2007. Under him, it became the world’s largest producer of nickel and palladium.Northern rail lines once busy with trains moving prisoners to a network of Soviet concentration camps are quieter now as the region’s high-cost mines struggle to sell coking coal to southern steel plants.Profit, not political prisoners, drives 21stcentury industry in Russia’s Far North. The Kremlin’s ambitious plans for an Arctic revival depend largely on whether it can make an often cruel environment economically efficient.Danish researchers maintain that 97 per cent of the Arctic’s resources — the oil, natural gas and minerals — are safely locked up in various countries’ undisputed sovereign territory. Yet both Canada and Russia have competing claims over a patch of sea bed near the North Pole. The countries are hurrying to compile scientific evidence to support their sovereignty claims before a United Nations commission by a 2013 deadline.“The best way to defend your sovereignty in the Arctic, for one thing, is to use it,” Vasiliev said. “And the second thing is to solve all the remaining regional problems because the more problems you have, the less sovereignty you have.“Solving the issues shows that you have created the possibility to govern, to manage, your sovereign territories.” By that measure, it isn’t guns and troops that Canada needs to fear, it’s the workaday Russians in places like Murmansk. They’re conquering the Far North each day.Early December, and the city has entered what people here call the polar night, a trying seven weeks when the sun doesn’t rise, the temperature can fall to minus 30 degrees Celsius and howling blizzards blow in from the sea.Yet the permafrost gives way to a forest of apartment blocks dominating Murmansk and its busy port.Cars jam its streets at rush hour, people stroll along broad avenues, past boutiques and department stores, factories churn out goods, all as if this were just another industrial town in the south.Even after years of exodus, which has cut Murmansk’s population by some 40 per cent since the collapse of the Soviet Union, it’s by far the world’s largest Arctic city.Three times the number of people live within Murmansk city limits as are scattered across the Canadian Arctic.It’s on the 95-year-old shoulders of Murmansk that the weight of a Soviet-era experiment rests. The premise is as audacious at is simple: As fragile as the Arctic is, it must be developed and exploited.Canadian Arctic experts such as Shelagh Grant, who has spent decades studying Arctic people and geopolitics, worry Canada isn’t doing enough to keep up with its northern neighbours.She is encouraged by announcements from Ottawa that back up patriotic rhetoric with action, humble though it is next to Russia’s buildup of security forces, ice-class vessels, bases and ports across the Arctic.“Apathy may be our greatest enemy,” warns Grant, author of a recent book on the history of competition over the Arctic and a former professor at Trent University.The Harper government recently announced it will move the Coast Guard’s northern headquarters to Iqaluit in 2013.In 2015, the Navy is scheduled to receive the first of up to eight ice-class patrol boats, at a cost of more than $3 billion.But other Arctic commitments are lagging. Five years ago, Harper said construction on Canada’s first deep-water port would begin at the former north Baffin Island mining town of Nanisivik in 2012.That’s been pushed back a year. Even if the new schedule sticks, and the naval facility opens in 2016, ice is expected to keep it closed from November to June each year, according to a consultant’s report released in August.“When the facility is unmanned, heat and power will be maintained to the minimum required to maintain equipment and provide site security,” the report says.Although the warm waters of the Gulf Stream keep Murmansk ice-free year round, Russia’s fleet of nuclear and diesel icebreakers keep ports and naval bases open each winter across some 5,500 kilometres of Arctic coast.Canada has 18 icebreakers in its fleet. Only two, the CCGS Louis S. St-Laurent and the CCGS Terry Fox, are heavy icebreakers. Harper announced in 2008 that the Coast Guard would get a new icebreaker to replace the Louis S. St-Laurent, the largest in Canada’s fleet.Almost four years later, Ottawa finally awarded the contract to build the vessel, which Harper has already named after his political hero, former Conservative prime minister John Diefenbaker. Seaspan’s Vancouver Shipyards Co. Ltd. will build the polar icebreaker, one of eight ships worth a total $8 billion.But the company still has to negotiate individual ship construction contracts with Ottawa, and workers aren’t expected to start building the first of the vessels until 2013.As the Coast Guard waits to rebuild its aging fleet, the Louis S. St-Laurent is showing the scars of its 42 years ploughing through Arctic ice.It broke down off Cambridge Bay in September after a journey in the High Arctic to map the seabed in support of Canada’s sovereignty claim to the United Nations commission.The Arctic isn’t kind to laggards.“The government’s revised Arctic policy released in the summer of 2010 is an excellent strategy, but we urgently need action, not promises,” Grant said from her home in Peterborough, Ont.“Canada must be able to enforce its marine regulations in the Arctic if we are to retain control over the adjacent waters and it must be prepared to provide the investment in Arctic infrastructure to accomplish these objectives.”Russians who pay any attention to Canada’s growing interest in the Arctic are perplexed by what they see as our sudden appetite for competition.They find the commotion about territorial disputes, the talk of maybe arming Coast Guard icebreakers, the military photo-ops of soldiers taking aim in the snow, to be reckless — if slightly amusing — fear mongering.“Frankly speaking, I don’t see any areas of conflict in the Arctic, but many areas for cooperation and close bilateral work together,” said Alexander Shestakov, director of the World Wildlife Fund’s Global Arctic Program.Each Arctic nation has something vital to learn from the other about responsible development in one of the planet’s most sensitive and endangered environments, one that plays a critical role in cooling a warming climate, Shestakov said.“We have 300 years of experience compared to Canada’s 50 years of experience, so absolutely, it would be better to work together.”Right now, Russia is running away with the race.Its state-owned energy companies are moving to tap vast offshore fields of oil and natural gas, where icebergs and thick ice sheets with enough force to snap regular steel once made drilling a pipe dream.For decades, Russia has been the world’s leader in navigating through Arctic ice, with the only nuclear-powered icebreakers. One even cruises with tourists to the North Pole.Russia currently has around 40 icebreakers, nine of which are nuclear-powered. The rest are diesel-electric.The fleet is about to get better. Russia is building three nuclear and six diesel icebreakers to help keep open the Northern Sea Route, marketed to the world’s shippers as a shorter, cheaper route between Asia and Europe.Russia is building a floating nuclear reactor, part of a plan to string seven sea-based power plants along its Arctic coast to provide remote mines and settlements with electricity.The Russian navy is getting new nuclear submarines and expanding its northern security forces to patrol the region where Canada and Russia have competing claims over a patch of seabed near the North Pole.Russian officials and experts say the disputed area around a mountain range called the Lomonosov Ridge isn’t likely to be a source of significant amounts of oil and natural gas, as some in the West believe.A bigger problem for Canada is the Northwest Passage, which is opening to international shipping as heavy ice melts for longer periods each summer. It could challenge Russia’s long-established Northern Sea Route as a shorter, cheaper way for ships to move between Europe and Asia.Ottawa insists it is a Canadian waterway. If it wins the argument, foreign ships would need permission to use the passage. But many countries, including the U.S. and the European Union, consider it an international strait open to all.In a sign of the rising stakes, China is building a huge icebreaker set to launch in 2014. China says it will use the new icebreaker for scientific research and exploration in the Arctic and Antarctic. It could also prove a valuable political tool if China chooses to make a solo transit of the Northwest Passage to back its position that the waterway should be open to international traffic.An early Soviet dream of dominating the Arctic only started to seem possible when the climate suddenly warmed in the 1930s — and gulags full of political prisoners provided slave labour.When the Soviet Union ended 20 years ago, so did many of the state subsidies and controls that had kept Murmansk thriving for decades, and the mass movement south started.The future of those left behind depends on the massive bet Putin is wagering that the Arctic can make Russia great again.Each winter day, they wake to darkness, trudge through the morning in it, get just a tease of reflected sunlight around midday and then slip back into night by mid-afternoon. In summer, their minds must adapt to 24-hour sunlight.The campaign to tame the unforgiving landscape started under Stalin in the 1930s, when gulag labourers were forced to build his vision of an industrialized Far North that supplied essential resources to the south.“When the country became more closed, and wanted to be less dependent on imports, it went in search of its own resources,” said Julia Lajus, a historian who heads the Center for Environmental and Technical History in St. Petersburg.“It was also of strategic importance. We have a very long border along the north. And today we are concerned about warming, but we forget that the first concerns about Arctic warming was also in the 1930s.”Then, average Arctic temperatures rose by 1.7 degrees Celsius, a climate shift Lajus called “considerably large.”The warming wasn’t quite as profound as today’s, but vast areas of ice melted. As ice disappeared, Stalin opened the Northern Sea Route, which Putin is revitalizing as a potential money-maker.The Kremlin hopes it will rival the Suez Canal, and earn billions of dollars in shipping fees, which would make the route Russia’s second biggest source of foreign revenue, behind only oil and natural gas.Boris Baryshnikov has lived in Murmansk all his 73 years. He has watched oil, chemicals and nuclear waste ruin a coast that was once teeming with fish. As a boy, he used to scoop plaice and flounder from puddles in the bay when the tide went out. Today all he sees at low tide is thick oily sludge.He has read the newspaper reports of plans to drill for oil and natural gas in vast offshore fields in the western Arctic and thinks it is a disaster waiting to happen.“We Russians are not well-disciplined people,” the retired construction engineer said. “We definitely will have accidents now and then.”Baryshnikov was born here in 1938, when Stalin’s vise-like grip was tightening, a son of the Arctic, who grew up a “child of the people’s enemy.”His father was one of eight children in a peasant family deemed wealthy by the Communists because they had more cattle than other villagers, and ran a small shop from their log house. In the early 1930s, the state seized the family’s property and scattered the parents and children to Siberia, the Urals and other parts of the Soviet Union. Baryshnikov’s father was ordered to settle in Murmansk and work as a carpenter. He was under the constant supervision of the ruthless NKVD, which later became the KGB spy agency.In 1939, the year after Baryshnikov’s birth, his father was arrested and sent to work in a mine.Word of his whereabouts came with the announcement of his death.Baryshnikov could tell from his mother’s tears, the hateful stares from neighbours and strangers, the endless refusals of fairness from government workers, that he was somehow bad.“We were always the last to get anything,” he told me. “My mother had to beg for everything, many times, with tears. When people learned we were the children of the people’s enemy, their attitude was stern.”Baryshnikov is a barrel of a man. He used to be captain of the Murmansk soccer team, and he stopped playing only last year when his knee gave out. Leaning forward to make a point, his shoulders and biceps bulge like a man half his age.I told Baryshnikov his face, especially when he smiled, reminded me of former Soviet premier Nikita Krushchev.He took exception to the comparison, and eagerly launched into a story about Khrushchev’s visit to Murmansk in 1963, when a large crowd of workers pushed their way past security to hear him speak at a sports field.It was an unusually warm, sunny day, Baryshnikov said, and that apparently made Khrushchev doubt that Arctic workers deserved a 100 per cent salary bonus mandated by law.He told the crowd they earned a lot, which they took as a compliment and cheered, whereupon the notoriously short-tempered premier said he was criticizing them.The crowd objected.“We even have difficulty buying socks!” someone bellowed.“Who do you think I am?” Khrushchev fired back. “Do you think I’m your supply officer?”The premier left in a huff, and not long after he got back to Moscow, the pay bonus for Arctic workers was cut to 80 per cent.It’s still one of several Arctic perks on the books, but workers in state-owned companies are more likely to get it than employees of private firms, which try to avoid the high cost of business in the Far North.Many Russians are growing uneasy with what looks to them like an authoritarian streak in Putin and President Dmitry Medvedev, who plan to switch places again next year. It reminds them too much of the Soviet ways.The Russian government’s new love of the Arctic leaves Baryshnikov cold. He has heard a lot of promises from the Kremlin that never came true.Over cups of strong coffee, I told Baryshnikov a lot of Canadians wonder if Russia has designs on our Arctic, and whether we would be strong enough to defend it.He smiled, flashing a glittering top row of gold-capped teeth.“Canadians don’t need to worry,” he said. “We will not move too fast here.”To at least one pioneer of Russia’s Far North, the most unsettling hot air over the Arctic blows in from the Kremlin.Not far from the shores where he once fished, drilling rigs may soon prove him wrong.AP Enterprise: Russia oil spills wreak devastation Nataliya Vasilyeva AP Business Writer / December 17, 2011 USINSK, Russia—On the bright yellow tundra outside this oil town near the Arctic Circle, a pitch-black pool of crude stretches toward the horizon. The source: a decommissioned well whose rusty screws ooze with oil, viscous like jam.This is the face of Russia's oil country, a sprawling, inhospitable zone that experts say represents the world's worst ecological oil catastrophe.Environmentalists estimate at least 1 percent of Russia's annual oil production, or 5 million tons, is spilled every year. That is equivalent to one Deepwater Horizon-scale leak about every two months. Crumbling infrastructure and a harsh climate combine to spell disaster in the world's largest oil producer, responsible for 13 percent of global output.Oil, stubbornly seeping through rusty pipelines and old wells, contaminates soil, kills all plants that grow on it and destroys habitats for mammals and birds. Half a million tons every year get into rivers that flow into the Arctic Ocean, the government says, upsetting the delicate environmental balance in those waters.It's part of a legacy of environmental tragedy that has plagued Russia and the countries of its former Soviet empire for decades, from the nuclear horrors of Chernobyl in Ukraine to lethal chemical waste in the Russian city of Dzerzhinsk and paper mill pollution seeping into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds one-fifth of the world's supply of fresh water.Oil spills in Russia are less dramatic than disasters in the Gulf of Mexico or the North Sea, more the result of a drip-drip of leaked crude than a sudden explosion. But they're more numerous than in any other oil-producing nation including insurgency-hit Nigeria, and combined they spill far more than anywhere else in the world, scientists say."Oil and oil products get spilled literally every day," said Dr. Grigory Barenboim, senior researcher at the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute of Water Problems.No hard figures on the scope of oil spills in Russia are available, but Greenpeace estimates that at least 5 million tons leak every year in a country producing about 500 million tons a year.Dr. Irina Ivshina, of the government-financed Institute of the Environment and Genetics of Microorganisms, supports the 5 million ton estimate, as does the World Wildlife Fund.The figure is derived from two sources: Russian state-funded research that shows 10-15 percent of Russian oil leakage enters rivers; and a 2010 report commissioned by the Natural Resources Ministry that shows nearly 500,000 tons slips into northern Russian rivers every year and flow into the Arctic.The estimate is considered conservative: The Russian Economic Development Ministry in a report last year estimated spills at up to 20 million tons per year.That astonishing number, for which the ministry offered no elaboration, appears to be based partly on the fact most small leaks in Russia go unreported. Under Russian law, leaks of less than 8 tons are classified only as "incidents" and carry no penalties.Russian oil spills also elude detection because most happen in the vast swaths of unpopulated tundra and conifer forestin the north, caused either by ruptured pipes or leakage from decommissioned wells.Weather conditions in most oil provinces are brutal, with temperatures routinely dropping below minus 40 degrees Celsius (minus 40 Fahrenheit) in winter. That makes pipelines brittle and prone to rupture unless they are regularly replaced and their condition monitored.Asked by The Associated Press to comment, the Natural Resources Ministry and the Energy Ministry said they have no data on oil spills and referred to the other ministry for further inquiries.Even counting only the 500,000 tons officially reported to be leaking into northern rivers every year, Russia is by far the worst oil polluter in the world.--Nigeria, which produces one-fifth as much oil as Russia, logged 110,000 tons spilled in 2009, much of that due to rebel attacks on pipelines.--The U.S., the world's third-largest oil producer, logged 341 pipeline ruptures in 2010 -- compared to Russia's 18,000 -- with 17,600 tons of oil leaking as a result, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. Spills have averaged 14,900 tons a year between 2001 and 2010.--Canada, which produces oil in weather conditions as harsh as Russia's, does not see anything near Russia's scale of disaster. Eleven pipeline accidents were reported to Canada's Transport Safety Board last year, while media reports of leaks, ranging from sizable spills to a tiny leak in a farmer's backyard, come to a total of 7,700 tons a year.--In Norway, Russia's northwestern oil neighbor, spills amounted to some 3,000 tons a year in the past few years, said Hanne Marie Oeren, head of the oil and gas section at Norway's Climate and Pollution Agency.Now that Russian companies are moving to the Arctic to tap vast but hard-to-get oil and gas riches, scientists voice concerns that Russia's outdated technologies and shoddy safety record make for a potential environmental calamity there.Gazpromneft, an oil subsidiary of the gas giant Gazprom, is preparing to drill for oil in the Arctic's Pechora Sea, even as environmentalists complain that the drilling platform is outdated and the company is not ready to deal with potential ernment scientists acknowledge that Russia does not currently have the required technology to develop Arctic fields but say it will be years before the country actually starts drilling."We must start the work now, do the exploration and develop the technology so that we would be able to ... start pumping oil from the Arctic in the middle of this century," Alexei Kontorovich, chairman of the council on geology, oil and gas fields at the Russian Academy of Sciences, told a recent news conference.The same academy's Barenboim said, however, that Russian technology is developing too slowly to make it a safe bet for Arctic exploration."Over the past years, environmental risks have increased more sharply compared to how far our technologies, funds, equipment and skills to deal with them have advanced," he said.In 1994, the republic of Komi, where Usinsk lies 60 kilometers (40 miles) south of the Arctic Circle, became the scene of Russia's largest oil spill when an estimated 100,000 tons splashed from an aging pipeline.It killed plants and animals, and polluted up to 40 kilometers (25 miles) of two local rivers, killing thousands of fish. In villages most affected, respiratory diseases rose by some 28 percent in the year following the leak.Seen from a helicopter, the oil production area is dotted with pitch-black ponds. Fresh leaks are easy to find once you step into the tundra north of Usinsk. To spot a leak, find a dying tree. Fir trees with drooping gray, dry branches look as though scorched by a wildfire. They are growing insoil polluted by oil.Usinsk spokeswoman Tatyana Khimichuk said the city administration had no powers to influence oil company operations."Everything that happens at the oil fields is Lukoil's responsibility," she said, referring to Russia's second largest oil company, which owns a network of pipelines in the region.Komi's environmental protection officials also blamed oil companies. The local prosecutor's office said in a report this year that the main problem is "that companies that extract hydrocarbons focus on making profits rather than how to use the resources rationally."Valery Bratenkov works as a foreman at oil fields outside Usinsk.After hours, he is with a local environmental group. Bratenkov used to point out to his Lukoil bosses that oil spills routinely happen under their noses and asked them to repair the pipelines. "They were offended and said that costs too much money," he said.Activists like Bratenkov find it hard if not impossible to hold authorities to account in the area since some 90 percent of the local population comprises oil workers and their families who have moved from other regions of Russia, and depend on the industry for their livelihood.Representatives of Lukoil denied claims that they try to conceal spills and leaks, and said that no more than 2.7 tons leaked last year from its production areas in Komi.Ivan Blokov, campaign director at Greenpeace Russia, who studies oil spills, said the situation in Komi is replicated across Russia's oil-producing regions, which stretch from the Black Sea in the southwest to the Chinese border in Russia's Far East."It is happening everywhere," Blokov said. "It's typical of any oil field in Russia. The system is old and it is not being replaced in time by any oil company in the country."What also worries scientists and environmentalists is that oil spills are not confined to abandoned or aging fields. Alarmingly, accidents happen at brand new pipelines, said Barenboim.At least 400 tons leaked from a new pipeline in two separate accidents in Russia's Far East last year, according to media reports and oil companies. Transneft's pipeline that brings Russian oil from Eastern Siberia to China was put into operation just months before the two spills happened.The oil industry in Komi has been sapping nature for decades, killing or forcing out reindeer and fish. Locals like the 63-year-old Bratenkov are afraid that when big oil leaves, there will be only poisoned terrain left in its wake."Fishing, hunting -- it's all gone," Bratenkov said.------Bjoern H. Amland contributed to this report from Oslo, Norway.In remote Russia, villagers grapple with massive natural gas project Elke | Sámi-Radio, Sweden | Dec 17, 2011 Teriberka, Russia -- The Shtokman field, one of the biggest natural gas fields in the world, is located way up north in the Barents Sea, 650 kilometers north of the Kola Peninsula on the northwest coast of Russia.The gas company behind Shtokman -- owned by Russia's Gazprom, French Total and Norwegian Statoil -- expects to make a final decision in December or January on whether to invest tens of billions in the gas field. The gas will be extracted from the sea and transported to the small Russian fishing village of Teriberka, where a gas plant will be built.From there the gas will be sent south to the large Nord Stream gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea, and then on to the European market. Portions of the gas will be cooled and shipped via the Northern Sea Route to Asia.According to Shtokman, there are 3.9 trillion cubic meters of gas in the Barents Sea north of the Kola Peninsula. That's enough to provide the entire world with gas for a year. The gas field was discovered several years ago. The gas companies' investment would be $36.2 billion, with the Shtokman field up and running in 2016.This is according to their plans, but they have already been postponed multiple times. Environmental organizations, such as Russian Greenpeace and Norwegian Bellona, have issued warnings about the environmental impact of the proposed plans, and want the environmental risks to be evaluated first.'You don't live here, you just survive'Hopes for the development are high in the small fishing village of Teriberka, where time has stood still. There is no trash service: garbage is piled between the gray, run-down houses. Several houses have collapsed and living standards are low.A small gray house in the town center proves to be a store, and in the doorway we meet two older women who speak agitatedly about their difficult lives."You don't live here, you just survive. It used to be better. We're going to be dead when the gas plant comes, but look at how we live now," says one of the women.She shows us her home with resignation, pointing out the snowed-in outhouse and the cracked and ragged gray stone house. The dark living space reeks of old dirt and wet clothing; sometimes they have no hot water, and the electricity comes and goes. Outside, the snowstorm gains momentum; one of the many stray dogs has managed to slink in and sniffs at the large bones the woman bought for the day's soup.Blue barracksDown on the beach, which does not freeze here, a few small blue barracks stand next to the windswept cemetery. To keep them from blowing away, flowers are latched down to the tombstones. At the moment, the blue barracks and a small, newly built stretch of road are the only visible indications of Shtokman's presence.But once the decision to build a natural gas plant is made, Teriberka will be transformed into a paradise -- at least, that is the hope of Aleksandrovna Kozhina, the municipality's vice chairman."Nature will still be beautiful here, even if a big factory is built. Teriberka will become a paradise," she says.The construction of the gas plant is expected to employ approximately 14,000 workers. The village currently has about 1,300 residents, though the figure is highly unreliable. Many people who are registered here have moved into town, and the houses are left behind; they are impossible to sell today.In the small school in the village, we meet one of the teachers, Medvedjev Nikolaj Nikolajvitj. He enjoys fishing in his free time, but does not believe the gas project will harm the fish or the natural surroundings."Maybe the blasting in the ocean could scare the fish, but only temporarily," he says.Indeed, the villagers seem to be willing to compromise on the environment as long as the project goes through, and they get jobs and money.Major environmental problems?Bellona, the Norwegian environmental organization, has a local office in Murmansk and is closely following the development in Russia.Nina Lesikhina, who is with Bellona, calls Shtokman's plans a huge experiment, but says the Arctic is not the right place to do it. Bellona thinks the Shtokman project will probably happen, but not as soon as the residents of Teriberka hope."It's too expensive and technologically complicated to extract gas from the ocean and take it ashore, and the environmental risks are massive. The ecosystem in the Barents Sea is sensitive and invaluable," says Lesikhina.On a map, she shows how the Shtokman field is in an area where several large icebergs drift. If an iceberg collided with the gas platform, the consequences would be huge, she says.But Shtokman's local manager in Murmansk, Nikolaij Berezjnoij, rejects the criticism and misgivings.He says that Norwegian owner Statoil's experience in extracting gas from the sea forms the foundation for the project's risk-control system. "It follows international rules and procedures," he says.This story is posted on Alaska Dispatch as part of Eye on the Arctic, a collaborative partnership between public and private circumpolar media organizations.Abramovich's attorney to make final remarks in London court 19/12/2011LONDON, December 19, (RIA NOVOSTI)Litigation between Russian exiled oligarch Boris Berezovsky and Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich is approaching its final stage in the High Court of Justice in London: Jonathan Sumption, Abramivich's defense lawyer, is expected to make his final remarks on Monday, the Russian Legal Information agency (RAPSI/) reports.Sumption will to take the floor for two days to sum up everything said during the trial, including witnesses' testimonies.Berezovsky's counsel Laurence Rabinovitz will deliver his final conclusions in mid-January.Berezovsky is seeking compensation for the assets he was allegedly forced to sell to Abramovich between 2000 and 2003. The lawsuit was filed in 2007.Boris Berezovsky that Roman Abramovich intimidated him and his business partner Badri Patarkatsishvili into selling a number of assets, including a 43-percent interest in the Sibneft oil company and a stake in the Rusal aluminum group, at a fraction of their value.Berezovsky alleged that Abramovich abused his confidence.Abramovich disputes Berezovsky’s claim that he owned stakes in these companies. The Chelsea football club owner said he paid millions of dollars, often in cash, to Berezovsky only for political protection, however the payments were effected legally.According to Abramovich Berezovsky had gained such clout that he became a "political corporation" attracting all of Russia's major businesses, which "paid for his services".Bad blood and billions: Russian titans’ UK court battle nears end: 19 December, 2011, 11:31Edited: 19 December, 2011, 11:31 One of the biggest civil trials in British legal history is entering its final stages, with two Russian tycoons in the spotlight. Boris Berezovsky is suing his former business partner, Roman Abramovich, claiming more than US$6 billion in damages.On Monday, Abramovich’s lawyer will start giving his final statement.Boris Berezovsky claims they were business partners, equals in what became an enormous empire built on oil, aluminum and ill-gotten gains. He wants a bigger slice of the imperial pie than the US$1.2 billion he received back in 2002.Abramovich admits that cash payments were made to his former mentor, but says this was just protection money, a necessary business expense at the time to benefit from Berezovsky’s political capital.Both men have disclosed damaging details of their own during the hearings, as a way of trying to humiliate each rival even more. Abramovich even passed off one payment to Berezovsky as an artificial transaction, freely admitting it was a way around the money laundering regulations. As for Berezovsky, he claims his stake in Sibneft – their company – was 25 per cent, but has been forced to come clean about how for several years he took much more than that, sometimes even more than the company’s own profits.It is this sense of lawlessness that Abramovich’s lawyer will emphasize in the closing statement of his defense, reports RT’s Ivor Bennett. He has already likened 1990s Russia to medieval England and it is that get-out clause both are using for their previous misdeeds. The difference is Abramovich is using it also to show that legitimate business simply did not exist at that time.Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has recently acknowledged that fact in his recent televised Q&A, in which he said that this trial should be held in Russia, because that is where the money was stolen from, and that is where it should be divided.National Economic TrendsRuble Declines to 10-Week Low Versus Dollar as Oil Price Falls Denis Maternovsky - Dec 19, 2011 12:18 PM GMT+0400 The ruble fell to its weakest level in 10 weeks, as oil, Russia’s chief export, dropped for a fourth day and traded near its lowest position in six weeks. The Russian currency depreciated less than 0.1 percent to 32.04 by 10:44 a.m. in Moscow, heading for its lowest since Oct. 7 and adding to a 3.6 percent decline in the past two weeks. The ruble was little changed at 41.6885 versus the euro, leaving it steady at 36.3841 against the central bank’s target dollar-euro basket. Oil futures slipped as much as 0.9 percent to $92.67 a barrel in New York after falling 0.4 percent on Dec. 16 to their lowest close since Nov. 2. Oil extended its losses after today’s announcement that North Korean leader Kim Jong Il died. European Union finance ministers will hold a conference call today addressing a self-imposed deadline for drawing additional aid and creating new budget rules. Investors increased bets that the Russian currency will weaken further, with non-deliverable forwards showing the ruble at 32.4915 per dollar in three months, compared with expectations of 32.43 per dollar on Dec. 16. The contracts are a guide to expectations of currency movements as they allow foreign investors and companies to fix the exchange rate at a particular level in the future. Russia’s dollar-denominated Eurobond due in 2020 fell, increasing the yield two basis points to 4.753 percent. To contact the reporter on this story: Denis Maternovsky in Moscow at dmaternovsky@ To contact the editor responsible for this story: Gavin Serkin at gserkin@ Market Buzz: No Christmas surprises expected from Russian market : 19 December, 2011, 11:31Edited: 19 December, 2011, 11:31 With little sign of a Christmas rally, trading volumes are beginning to drop towards the end of the year. And the coming week is unlikely to deliver an early Yuletide gift both in Russia and globally.After closing in the red on Friday, Russian markets aren’t expected to bring any surprises this week. RTS finished trading at 1373.73, which is 1.54% down, with the MICEX also being 0.73% down, to 1 383.42.Global markets also remained pretty calm last week, despite positive October statistics from the EU indicating a trade balance surplus. It was a hundred million euro above general expectations, at 1.1 billion euro. This helped European markets finish trading on Friday with a downward slide. The French CAC 40 went down 0.88 % and German DAX lost 0.5%.Igor Prokhaev from Troika Dialog doesn’t expect much activity during the coming week, but says overall global investment sentiment is going to be positive. That’s “if we don’t see any serious bad news from Europe, and I think that the credit that’s going to be released for Greece will be taken very positively by European and global investors. And I don’t think the US will give us any negative surprises.” Prokhaev explained. However, “Russia remains very cheap”, with the changing global sentiment possible to make a turnaround for Russian market, adds Prokhaev. The news about the European fiscal union, expected to come on Monday, may add significant optimism to the markets by the end of the day, should any agreements be reached, underlines Anton Safonov from Investcafe. And as political uncertainty remains one of the key drivers in the?Russian market,?firm and confident steps of Russian authorities to improve political environment in the country could trigger growth longer term, says another Investcafe expert – Kirill Markin.3Q 2011 GDP statistics from the USA, that come on Thursday, as well as the data about personal income and expenses, expected to be released on Friday, will be among the most important drivers this week, Safonov concludes. Business, Energy or Environmental regulations or discussionsAganbegyan to Target More IPOs as Moscow Exchanges Merge: Russia Overnight Leon Lazaroff and Suzanne O’Halloran - Dec 19, 2011 8:00 AM GMT+0400 Russia’s newly merged stock exchange will seek to lure more companies to list in Moscow rather than abroad and try to attract more funds from local investors, said Ruben Aganbegyan, president of the Micex-RTS. The Micex Stock Exchange merged with the RTS Exchange on Dec. 16 and will maintain their separate indexes in Moscow, with the so-called main market to trade ruble-denominated Micex- listed equities and bonds and the standard market to trade RTS- listed company stock denominated in dollars, according to a statement on the RTS website. As many as 10 companies are considering initial public offerings in Russia, Aganbegyan said. A priority of the Micex-RTS will be to work on “getting internal investing in Russia,” he said in a Bloomberg Television interview from Moscow conducted on Dec. 16. “The other big reform this year is improving the issuance of securities in Russia to enable easier IPOs locally.” Futures on the RTS expiring in March rose 0.6 percent to 135,695 in U.S. trading on Dec. 16, and a separate gauge measuring volatility in the futures dropped for a second day, declining 2 percent to 49.08. Phone company OAO Rostelecom (ROSYY) jumped the most in five weeks, as Moscow brokerage Renaissance Capital raised its target price. While the Micex handles about 70 percent of equity transactions in Russia and the RTS dominates derivatives trading, Russian stock trading in London outpaced the volumes in Moscow for 13 straight months through September, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The gap widened to a three-year high of 50 percent in August. Since coming to power in 2008, one of President Dmitry Medvedev’s main stated aims has been to develop Moscow as a global financial center. IPOs Postponed Volumes on the 30-stock Micex were $1.72 billion on Dec. 16, compared with $13.2 million on Dec. 15 for the Bloomberg Russia-US 14 index of 14 Russian shares and American depositary receipts traded in New York. The Russia-US 14 index fell 0.7 percent to 89.77 on Dec. 16, down 2.2 percent last week. “Market conditions” saw some firms postpone their stock placements “and what we’re doing is making sure we’re an exchange rated to offer products around,” Aganbegyan said. United Co. Rusal (486), the world’s largest aluminum producer, lost 1.6 percent to HK$4.80 in Hong Kong trading as of 11:55 a.m. local time. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index slumped 2.4 percent after North Korean state television reported the nation’s leader Kim Jong Il had died and Fitch Ratings said it may cut some European countries’ credit ratings. Energy Exporter OAO Mechel, Russia’s largest producer of steelmaking coal which got 19 percent of 2010 sales from Europe, added the most in a week in U.S. trading as Luxembourg’s Prime Minister Jean- Claude Juncker said European Union states should meet a Dec. 19 deadline for arranging loans to the International Monetary Fund as part of a debt crisis-fighting accord. The world’s biggest energy exporter, Russia is also the largest exporter of palladium and nickel, which rose to a one- week high. Europe is the country’s largest trading partner. “For Russia, commodities are the factor to watch,” Tom Furda, director of Russian equity sales at Auerbach Grayson & Co.’s Moscow-based brokerage partner UralSib Financial Corp., said by phone from New York on Dec. 16. “In order for Russian equities to catch any wind, they’ll need positive news flow out of Europe and commodities to sustain an advance.” Nickel gained 3.7 percent to $18,550 a ton on the London Metal Exchange, while copper surged 2 percent to settle at $3.331 a pound on the Comex in New York, the biggest advance for a most-active contract since Nov. 30. The Standard & Poor’s GSCI index of 24 raw materials was little changed at 617.90 on Dec. 16, after dropping the previous two days. Rostelecom Gains Mechel (MTLR) ADRs rose 3.1 percent to $8.95 in New York, paring their weekly decline to 11 percent. Shares on the Micex fell 5.8 percent to 282.30 rubles, or the equivalent of $8.84. One Mechel ADR is equivalent to one ordinary share. ADRs of Rostelecom, Russia’s dominant fixed-line phone company, jumped 5.1 percent to $28.25, the biggest one-day gain since Nov. 10, after Renaissance Capital raised its price target for the company’s Moscow-traded shares to 172 rubles from 165 rubles. Rostelecom climbed 4.1 percent to 147.24 rubles in Moscow on Dec. 16, the equivalent of $4.61. One Rostelecom ADR represents six ordinary shares. Russia was formally admitted into the World Trade Organization on Dec. 16 after 18 years of negotiations, the last major economy to enter the Geneva-based body. The Market Vectors Russia ETF (RSX), a U.S.-traded fund that holds Russian shares, lost 0.5 percent to $26.80 on Dec. 16. Cheapest Market The Micex index is the cheapest of the 21 emerging-market indexes tracked by Bloomberg. The measure trades at 4.8 times analysts’ earnings estimates for member companies, compared with 9.9 times for Brazil’s Bovespa (IBOV) index and 14 for the BSE India Sensitive Index. (SENSEX) The Micex fell 0.7 percent to 1,383.42 on Dec. 16, bringing its drop in the week to 0.9 percent. The RTS slipped 1.5 percent to 1,373.73 and was down 2.6 percent last week. Now is a good time to be “selectively buying assets” Ian McCall, Managing Partner at Quesnell Capital SA, an emerging markets investment adviser in Geneva that manages 100 million Swiss francs of assets, including Russian stock, said by phone on Dec. 16. “There’s value there for sure.” To contact the reporters on this story: Leon Lazaroff in New York at llazaroff@; Suzanne O’Halloran in New York at sohalloran@ To contact the editor responsible for this story: David Papadopoulos at papadopoulos@ Russia's MICEX, RTS exchanges close merger GMTMOSCOW, Dec 19 (Reuters) - Russia's two main stock exchanges, MICEX and RTS, formally closed their merger on Monday to create a unified platform with an estimated value of $4.5 billion that plans to float in 2013. The merger will create a 'one-stop shop' for trading in stocks, bonds, derivatives and currencies, and clear the way for further market reforms in 2012 including the creation of a single depositary, MICEX said in a statement. The merger is part of a Kremlin-backed strategy to promote Moscow as an international financial centre. Rising capital flight and a wave of Russian companies seeking to list abroad, particularly in London, pose challenges however and investment bankers say it will be hard for MICEX-RTS to attract listings and build volumes. (Reporting by Douglas Busvine) Merged exchange to make new name public in H1 2012 , 19.12.2011, Moscow 12:53:14.The new name of the merged MICEX-RTS stock exchange will be announced in the second half of 2012, the bourse's President Ruben Aganbegyan said at a news conference after a ceremony marking the beginning of trading on the single equity exchange. "This is an issue that needs to be decided by our shareholders, we are working on it and consultants are being hired. So it will be a while before a decision is made whether the name will remain RTS-MICEX or a new name will be used," he said. ??????The merged exchange will form a family of benchmark indices pegged to RTS and MICEX, managing director of the merged exchange Roman Goryunov said. ??????The development strategy of MICEX-RTS is expected to be finalized in the first quarter of 2012, Sergey Shvetsov, chairman of the bourse's board of directors, said. The goal of the exchange is to make the Russian market the center for pricing Russian assets, Aganbegyan added. December 19, 2011 11:30Fifth hydraulic unit launched at Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP, Russia. Dec 19 (Interfax) - Russian power generating company OJSC RusHydro (RTS: HYDR) has launched the fifth hydraulic unit at the Sayano-Shushenskaya hydro-electric power plant (HPP).Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin took part in the hydraulic unit's launch ceremony, an Interfax correspondent reported from the HPP.Putin pressed a symbolic button to launch the unit, and a monitor displayed its specifications and changes in the HPP's capacity. The meter readings showed that at the moment of the unit's launch, the entire HPP's capacity totaled 1920 MW. For a few seconds, its capacity exceeded 2500 MW.RusHydro representatives briefed Putin on progress in the station's reconstruction, noting that all of the necessary equipment had been installed strictly according to schedule.Prior the launch of the new hydro unit, there were four reconstructed blocks at the Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP. Hydro unit N1 is the plant's fifth operating block and its first brand-new block. Like the other reconstructed blocks, it has a capacity of 640 MW. Equipment for the new unit was provided by OJSC Power Machines (RTS: SILM), with which RusHydro signed a contract to manufacture ten hydro turbines and nine hydro generators with a capacity of 640 MW each, as well as six excitation systems. The contract was worth 11.7 billion rubles (without VAT).It is expected that the new units' service period will be boosted to 40 years, and that the maximum key performance indicator of the hydro turbines will reach 96.6%. RusHydro and Power Machines said that the new hydraulic units will possess enhanced cavitation sensitivity and a more efficient process protections system (insufficiency in this area led to devastating consequences in a disaster at the HPP two years ago).In February, March, August and December of 2010, RusHydro reconstructed four hydro units - NN6, 5, 4 and 3 - that were affected by the disaster. In 2011, work began on installing new hydro units at the HPP. After the launch of N1, there are plans to launch NN7, 8, and 9 in 2012. RusHydro will also introduce three new blocks per year (including replacing the NN3, 4, 5 and 6 blocks with new ones) so that by the end of 2014 the HPP's reconstruction will be complete. The total cost of the project was previously estimated at around 37 billion rubles. After the HPP is fully reconstructed, its capacity will reach its pre-disaster level of 6400 MW (ten blocks of 640 MW each).Eb(Our editorial staff can be reached at eng.editors@interfax.ru)December 19, 2011 09:13Sibur board to discuss Sibur-Fertilizers sale on Dec 22. Dec 19 (Interfax) - The board of the Sibur Holding will discuss a deal to sell Sibur-Fertilizers and implementation of a strategy to pull out of the tire business on December 22.The agenda for the meeting also includes approval of the 2012 business plan and investment program as well as the acquisition of new shares, Sibur said in a press release.Earlier the Federal Antimonopoly Service gave two companies permission to buy Sibur-Fertilizers - Agroprodmir and Siberian Business Union. The companies were given various instructions.Sources on the market told Interfax that Metafrax (RTS: MEFR), Dmitry Mazepin structures and Sibur group management were after Perm-based Mineral Fertilizers (RTS: MINU), which is part of Sibur-Fertilizers.It was reported earlier that Sibur had transferred the Kirov Tire Plant to the Pirelli and Russian Technologies joint venture and that it plans to also transfer the Voronezh Tire Plant to the joint venture. Sources on the market said the rest of Sibur-Russia Tires assets may be purchased by the tire company's management.me(Our editorial staff can be reached at eng.editors@interfax.ru)Alrosa's Revenues Rise with Prices(December 18, '11, 9:28 IDEX Online Staff Reporter) (IDEX Online News) – Alrosa sold 9.1 million carats at $1.29 billion in the third quarter, the Russian diamond monopoly reported. To help protect rough diamond prices in the period, Alrosa sold more of its goods to long-term clients.?Diamond production in the quarter totaled 6.9 million carats, indicating that a large percentage of sales were of stocked goods. Sales and production decreased as compared to the second quarter of the year (9.7 percent, 25.8 percent respectively).?In the first nine months of the year, Alrosa sold $3.35 billion worth of diamonds, an 18.8 percent year-over-year increase. ?Net profit increased 3.2 times compared with the first nine months of 2010 reaching RUB 35.53 billion ($1.1 billion), while net profit margin increased to 33 percent.?Rough diamond prices continued to increase in the first half of 2011 to July compared to 2010. Since August, rough diamond prices and demand were lackluster at best.Exec: Russia’s Sberbank ready to allot 1.7 bln rbl for start-ups, Dec 16 (PRIME) -- Russia’s largest bank, state-controlled Sberbank, is ready to provide 1.7 billion rubles for start-up project by 2014, Sergei Borisov, Sberbank’s vice president for the development of small businesses, said Friday.In turn, Mikhail Kachalkin, Sberbank’s department head said that the bank had allocated 170 million rubles for a pilot project launched on Monday aimed at financing start-ups.Sberbanks’s loan portfolio for small-sized businesses amounted to 630 billion rubles as of October 1, Kachalkin added.(31.8957 rubles – U.S. $1)End 16.12.2011 20:29Billionaire Lisin May Replace Freight One CEO, Kommersant Says Ilya Khrennikov - Dec 19, 2011 8:57 AM GMT+0400 Billionaire Vladimir Lisin, who agreed to pay $4 billion for 75 percent of OAO Freight One in October, may replace the company’s chief executive officer once the deal is completed, Kommersant reported. Alexander Sapronov, head of Lisin’s Independent Transportation Co., may become the new CEO, the Moscow-based newspaper said, citing people it didn’t identify. Freight One may also lease part of its cistern fleet to billionaire Gennady Timchenko, who competed with Lisin in Freight One’s privatization, Kommersant said. Nobody in the press office of UCL Holding, which holds Lisin’s transportation assets, could be reached immediately when Bloomberg called before normal business hours seeking comment. To contact the reporter on this story: Ilya Khrennikov in Moscow at ikhrennikov@ To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Viljoen at jviljoen@ ING Bank Eurasia to offer bonds worth $472m , 19.12.2011, Moscow 11:13:54.ING Bank Eurasia, the Russian subsidiary of international financial company ING Bank N.V., intends to offer three bond issues totaling RUB 15bn (approx. USD 472m) by public subscription, the bank said in a statement today following the approval of the respective decision by the board of directors.??????Each issue is valued at RUB 5bn (approx. USD 157m) and carries a five-year maturity term. On November 11, the bank placed a second bond issue worth RUB 5bn.??????ING Bank Eurasia ranks 28th among Russian lending institutions in terms of net assets, which stood at RUB 164.5bn (approx. USD 5.18bn) as of October 1. December 19, 2011 13:11Veropharm increases sales 15% to 4.5 bln rubles in 9mths. Dec 19 (Interfax) - Russian pharmaceutical company OJSC Veropharm (RTS: VRPH) increased its sales by 15% year-on-year to 4.534 billion rubles in January-September 2011, the company said on Monday.Ih(Our editorial staff can be reached at eng.editors@interfax.ru)Activity in the Oil and Gas sector (including regulatory)Russia Urals exports to slip by 1.4 pct in Q1-schedule ESTMOSCOW, Dec 19 (Reuters) - Exports of Russian Urals crude via the Transneft pipeline system will fall to 52.4 million tonnes in the first quarter of 2012, down 1.4 percent from the final quarter of 2011, the loading schedule showed on Monday.Urals exports to all destinations will decline, except for the Russian Baltic port of Primorsk, where loadings will increase by 1.7 percent to 17.5 million tonnes in the first three months of the year.The new Urals terminal at Ust-Luga, where the quay wall collapsed in November, a matter of days before it was due to load its first cargo, is expected to remain dry for the first quarter, as is the Polish Baltic port of Gdansk. (Reporting by Gleb Gorodyankin; Writing by Melissa Akin)Russia's Tatneft denies agreed deal in Iran Dec 19, 2011 9:14am GMTMOSCOW Dec 19 (Reuters) - Russian oil company Tatneft denied on Monday it had agreed to develop an oil field in Iran."Tatneft Group have not entered into any agreements, contracts and have not accepted any other undertakings relating to oil and gas projects in Iran," it said in a statement.Iran's Oil Ministry said on Sunday Iran had signed a deal reportedly worth up to $1 billion with Tatneft to develop the Zagheh oil field, on the Gulf coast of Bushehr province. (Reporting by Maria Kiselyova; Editing by Douglas Busvine)Russian, Iranian companies sign deal to develop Zagheh oil field 19/12/2011MOSCOW, December 19 (RIA Novosti)Iranian and Russian companies have signed a contract worth up to $1 billion to develop the Zagheh heavy oil field in south Iran, Iran's Petroleum Engineering and Development Company (PEDEC) said on its website.The deal between PEDEC, the subsidiary of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), and Tatneft, one of Russia's top ten crude oil producers, was signed on Sunday.A statement by PEDEC says the deal is worth $1 billion, while Tehran Times puts the contract value at $700 million.According to Press TV, Iranian Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi declined to specify the contract value."The contract is still in preliminary stages and its technical details are not ready yet. We hope to be able to estimate and announce its value in two months," Press TV quoted the minister as saying.The deal was signed by Naji Sadoni, managing director of the Petroleum Engineering and Development Company and Rustam Minnikhanov, the leader of Tatarstan who also heads the Tatneft board of directors."By signing the contract, production capacity of the [Zagheh] oil field is set boost by seven thousand barrels per day in the first phase and 55 thousand barrels per day in the second phase," a PEDEC statement reads.Iran is the second largest oil exporter among the OPEC countries and holds the fourth place in the world by oil output. Oil exports account for about 80 percent of Iran's revenues.Iran, Russia ink 1 billion dollars worth of oil deal: report 01:07:29TEHRAN, Dec. 18 (Xinhua) -- Iran signed an oil contract worth one billion U.S. dollars with a Russian oil company on Sunday, the state IRIB TV website reported.The Iranian Petroleum Engineering and Development Company and Russian Tatarstan republic's Tatneft Oil Company signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on development of Zagheh oil field in southern Iran.The contract, which was inked in the presence of the President of Russian republic of Tatarstan Rustam Minnikhanov and Iranian Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi, is aimed at developing Iranian Zagheh oil field in Iran's Bushehr province on the Persian Gulf coast, said IRIB.In the first stage to be completed after two years, the country will produce 7,000 barrels of heavy oil per day and in the second phase, after 5 years, the production capacity will increase to 55, 000 barrels per day (bpd), according to the report.The preliminary contract will be finalized after 3 months when the technical studies are completed, said the report without specifying the value of the contract.According to the Oil and Energy Information website affiliated to Iran's Oil Ministry, Qasemi said Sunday that Iran and Russian's Tatarstan republic will boost cooperation in oil sector.Speaking on the sidelines of the signing ceremony, he said that by getting help from Tatarstan republic's experiences and Russian know-how Iran will develop its heavy crude oil fields.Three dimensional seismic operations and data processing are among the work carried out previously in the field, the website said, adding that the development of Zagheh oil field will also be funded by Iran's private bank of Tat.On Sunday, Minnikhanov expressed his country's readiness to contribute to Iran's oil industry by offering its oil and gas technology, the official IRNA news agency reported.He said that Tatneft Oil Company enjoys very good experiences in heavy oil exploration and is ready to cooperate with Iranian oil industry by making use of its technology, according to the report.On Saturday, the visiting Tatar president termed development of Iran's South Pars gas field in Assalouyeh, in southern province of Bushehr, as "unbelievable," said IRNA.He noted that his country attaches great importance to its petrochemical activities, underlining the need for enhanced bilateral ties between Iran and Russia.Iran is under Western sanction pressure for international investments and developments of its oil and gas projects over its controversial nuclear program which the West claims that might aim at weapon grade. The Iranian government strongly rejects the allegations.Several Western energy investors, including Total and Shell, have already withdrawn from the country's energy projects.In October, Iran said that it had replaced Russia's Gazprom by Iranian companies in Azar on-shore oil field after it failed to come up with its obligations to finalize the project.According to the local English-language Tehran Times daily, although several big multinational oil companies have left Iran's oil and gas projects in recent years under U.S. pressure, Iran has been able to circumvent such pressure by attracting small and medium firms.Iran, a member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), is the world's fourth largest oil producer with an output of about 4 million barrels per day. The country's recoverable oil reserves are estimated at over 137 billion barrels, or 12 percent of the world's total. CORRECTED-Russian company signs up to develop Iran oil field, Dec 18 2011(Corrects spelling of Tatarstan throughout)* Rare example of new foreign investment in Iran oil* Russian republic of Tatarstan hopes for more cooperationTEHRAN, Dec 18 (Reuters) - Iran signed a deal reportedly worth up to $1 billion with Russia's Tatneft on Sunday to develop an oil field, a rare example of new foreign investment into the oil and gas sector of a country under ever tighter economic sanctions.Oil Ministry website SHANA said the development at the Zagheh oil field, on the Gulf coast of Bushehr province, would produce 7,000 barrels per day (bpd) in its first phase, growing to 55,000 barrels in a second phase of the contract.Iran, the world's fifth biggest oil exporter, says it produces 3.5 million bpd."This private company is one of the world's reputable companies working in extraction of heavy oil which is why we wanted to use its experiences," Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi was quoted as saying by the semi-official Mehr news agency.Qasemi declined to comment on the value of the contract, saying it would be revealed after two months when the technical details were finalised.However, Naji Sadouni, the director of the state Petroleum Engineering and Development Co., who signed the memorandum of understanding with his Russian counterpart, said the value of the contract was around $1 billion."The oil field will start production within 24 months and its full production will be in 54 months," Mehr quoted Sadouni as saying.The president of the southern Russian republic of Tatarstan, the home of Tatneft, in Tehran for the signing, also visited Iran's giant South Pars gas field and said he hoped for further economic cooperation with Iran."The diversity of projects in South Pars is unbelievable ... I hope that in future Tatarstan becomes a place for comprehensive Iran-Russia cooperation," Rustam Minnikhanov told the official IRNA news agency.Iran has been hit by international sanctions over its nuclear programme which the West suspects might be aimed at making bombs.Tehran denies the charge. Many Western companies have pulled out of Iran and few companies from elsewhere have shown enthusiasm to take their place.Russia has criticised new U.S. sanctions targeting Iran's financial and energy sectors as "unacceptable" and said they would damage any chances of renewing negotiations with Tehran over its nuclear programme.But there are few signs Russian investors are rushing to replace Western ones. Iran said in October that it had "excluded" Gazprom from Azar, a major on-shore oil field for what it said was a failing to live up to its undertakings. (Writing by Ramin Mostafavi; Editing by Jon Loades-Carter)Russian oil firm Ruspetro eyes London listing –source, Dec 18 2011MOSCOW/LONDON, Dec 18 (Reuters) - Russian oil firm Ruspetro is planning a London listing a source told Reuters, making the company the latest Russian resource company to seek liquidity and international profile on the UK's index.The source said the flotation of the company, which owns oil assets in Siberia, could occur in the first quarter of 2012.A report in London's Sunday Times said Ruspetro would look to raise 400 million pounds ($621.1 million) via the listing and had hired Bank of America Merrill Lynch to handle the process.Ruspetro declined to comment.The company needs 160 million pounds to repay loans and develop its oilfields, where it hopes to grow oil output to 70,000 barrels a day in five years time from its current 4,500 barrel level, said the Sunday Times.Two Russian companies which have recently floated in London, precious metals miner Polymetal and steel maker Evraz , will become the first Russian companies in the FTSE 100 when they start trading on the index on Monday.Others queuing up for London IPOs include, Polyus Gold , which is still in the process of gaining approval for a listing, potash firm Uralkali and Eurasia Drilling , which have both expressed interest in full London listings.TNK-BP Russian Specialists Gain Offshore Drilling Experience at Lan Do Platform in Vietnam's project team developing the Lan Do field offshore Vietnam has been joined by some of the company’s young Russian specialists, TNK-BP reported in a news release. The Russian interns will learn study the theory and practice of offshore drilling operations in Vung Tau and Ho Chi Minh City and on a drill rig.By TNK-BР The development programme will cover cement jobs, bit runs, bit hydraulics as well as general operations (casing running, drill stem testing). The programme is designed so that the work on the rig alternates with work onshore in the offices of TNK Vietnam (a subsidiary of TNK-BP) in Ho Chi Minh City or at the Company’s operations base in Vung Tau.According to TNK-BP Vice President, Wells, Eric Liron, the Lan Do development programme is “a great chance to expose young specialists to international experience”.“Developing competencies of our drilling young specialists is a strategic priority for the Company,” comments Gokhan Aker, Director, TNK-BP Corporate Drilling Dept. “For the first time, our young Russian specialists will be exposed to real offshore operations. Programmes like this are extremely crucial for TNK-BP now when it is going global as they help us prepare a pool of potential candidates for our current and future international projects and develop unique new competencies.”16.12.2011Total, Novatek start development of Russia's Termokarstovoye gas field: Total launches the development of the Termokarstovoye fieldDecember 16, 2011 -- Total today announced that it has taken, together with its partner Novatek, the final investment decision to develop the Termokarstovoye gas and condensates field. This onshore field is located in the Yamal Nenets autonomous district of Russian Federation, 250 kilometers east of Tarko-Sale. The field has a potential of around 47 billion cubic meters of natural gas and about 10 million tons of condensates. The project start-up is expected in 2015 with a production capacity of around 65, 000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d).The exploration and production license for the Termokarstovoye field is held by ZAO Terneftegas, joint venture of Novatek (51%) and Total (49 %).Total owns a 14.09% of share capital in Novatek, with which it created a strategic alliance earlier in 2011. Total is also Novatek’s main international partner on the Yamal LNG project with a 20% stake.Novatek, the largest independent gas producer in Russia, supplies approximately 13% of the domestic market. Its production reached 38.6 billion cubic metres of gas for the first nine months 2011, increasing by more than 45% compared to the same period of 2010. Novatek’s portfolio of resources is made of several giant fields that underline Novatek’s strong potential for growth.For further information, please contact:Tel. : +33 (0) 1 47 44 46 99 - Fax : +33 (0) 1 47 44 68 21Copyright 2011, Total SA. All rights reserved.16.12.2011Tatneft gets $75 mln Danish-backed loan for new refinery and TANECO announce ECA financingOAO Tatneft (“Tatneft”) and OAO TANECO (“TANECO”), a Tatneft subsidiary responsible for the construction and operation of a new refining complex in Nizhnekamsk, Tatarstan, (the “Project”) announce ECA-backed financings.TANECO obtained a USD75 mln unsecured loan from a group of banks backed by EKF, the Danish export credit agency (the “EKF Loan”). The EKF Loan is covered by the insurance line approved by EKF and is intended to reimburse TANECO’s past purchases of equipment, goods and services of Danish origin acquired in connection with construction of the Project. The term of the EKF Loan is 10 years and it bears an interest of 6 Months LIBOR plus 1.10 per cent per annum.TANECO also signed an unsecured facility agreement for up to USD144.48 mln backed by SACE, the Italian credit export agency (the “SACE Loan”). The purpose of the SACE Loan is to reimburse TANECO for past and future purchases of Italian equipment, goods, services and licenses that are employed in connection with the Project. The term of the SACE loan is 12 years (including 2 years drawing period) and it bears an interest of 6 Months LIBOR plus 1.25 per cent.Tatneft is a guarantor under both facilities.The signed ECA-backed financings followed very stringent environmental due diligence of the Project by the ECAs that included site visit earlier this year.The EKF Loan was arranged by Nordea Bank AB (Publ), Société Générale and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited. Soceiété Générale acted the Documentation Agent, Nordea Bank AB (Publ) acted as the EKF Agent and Facility Agent.The SACE Loan was arranged by Bank of Tokyo-Mitsbushi UFJ Ltd, Société Générale, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited with Société Générale acting as the Documentation, ECA and Facility Agent.RBS and Bank ZENIT acted as financial advisers to Tatneft and TANECO.Allen & Overy LLP acted as legal advisor to Tatneft and TANECO, and Clifford Chance LLP advised the lenders and SACE.Forward-looking statements: These materials contain statements about future events and expectations that are forward-looking in nature. Any statement in these materials that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement that involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements to differ. OAO TANECO assumes no obligations to update the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in factors affecting these statements.Copyright 2011, OAO Tatneft. All rights reserved.GazpromUkraine May Seek Delay on Gazprom Repayment, Kommersant Reports Kateryna Choursina - Dec 19, 2011 1:10 PM GMT+0400 NAK Naftogaz Ukrainy, Ukraine’s state energy company, may ask to delay repayment to Russia’s OAO Gazprom of an advance $1.8 billion for natural-gas transit services, Kommersant-Ukraine newspaper reported, citing an unidentified official at the Energy and Coal Ministry. Naftogaz received the advance payment in December 2010 and was due to pay it back in five years by increasing transit volumes from 2010, according to the Kiev-based newspaper. Considering the present transit fee, Naftogaz may need as long as eight or nine years to repay to Gazprom, Kommersant said. To contact the reporter on this story: Kateryna Choursina in Kiev at kchoursina@; To contact the editor responsible for this story: Claudia Carpenter at ccarpenter2@ Gazprom May Spend $125 Billion In Next Three Years - Report -(Dow Jones)- OAO Gazprom's (GAZP.RS) board will Tuesday discuss a plan envisioning 4.0 trillion rubles ($124.8 billion) in capital spending over the coming three years, the Vedomosti daily reports Monday citing a leaked document. The investment program, which includes value added tax, or VAT, and excludes spending at oil unit OAO Gazprom Neft (SIBN.RS) and at Gazprom's utility subsidiaries, foresees capital expenditure at RUB709.6 billion in 2012, RUB1.747 trillion in 2013 and RUB1.541 trillion in 2014. Gazprom didn't confirm the figures, but said an investment plan will be made official Tuesday, when it has been approved by the board. Spending will be aimed at a new gas pipeline from the Far Eastern region of Yakutia to Vladivostok on Russia's Pacific coast and on initial preparation for the South Stream pipeline across the Black Sea to Bulgaria. Analysts have criticized the company for excessive spending, arguing it is inefficient compared with western oil giants. Newspaper website: vedomosti.ru -By Moscow Bureau, Dow Jones Newswires; +7 495 232 9192 (END) Dow Jones Newswires December 19, 2011 03:51 ET (08:51 GMT) Copyright (c) 2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Verbundnetz Wins Lower Gas Prices From Gazprom, Kommersant Says Anna Shiryaevskaya - Dec 19, 2011 11:25 AM GMT+0400 Verbundnetz Gas AG won lower prices for natural-gas contracts from OAO Gazprom, Kommersant reported, citing Michael Ludwig, a board member at the German importer. VNG, as the company is known, is seeking to cut purchases of pipeline gas and focus more on supplies from the spot market, the Moscow-based newspaper cited Ludwig as saying. To contact the reporter on this story: Anna Shiryaevskaya in Moscow at ashiryaevska@ To contact the editor responsible for this story: Will Kennedy at wkennedy3@ Gazprom promgaz reduced 9 month net profit, 18 Dec 2011It is reported that the 9 month 2011 net profit at Gazprom promgaz declined 3.22 fold to RUB 12.437 million from RUB 40.158 million prior year period.The revenues lost 15.36% to come to RUB 2.841 billion from RUB 3.357 billion, profit from sales 14.97% to RUB 247.406 million from RUB 290.962 million.The Company is a research center of Gazprom in the sphere of the regional energetic policies validation and development of small fields.(Sourced from AK&M)18.12.2011Gazprom Drilling Rig Sinks Off Sakhalin oil drilling rig with 67 crew on board capsized and sank off the Russian Far East island of Sakhalin on Sunday when it ran into a storm while being towed, leaving 49 of the crew unaccounted for, the regional Emergencies Ministry said.Fourteen crew members were rescued alive from the 'Kolskaya' jack-up rig, operated by Russian offshore exploration company Arktikmorneftegazrazvedka (AMNGR), and four bodies were recovered. The rest of the crew were missing."The floating drilling rig capsized 200 kilometers (125 miles) off the coast of Sakhalin island at 12.45 local time (0145 GMT)," the Emergencies Ministry said in a statement on its website.The statement said a rescue craft and helicopters had been sent to the site to scour the waters for survivors, but Russian news agencies said rescue work had been halted until Monday morning as night fell in the far eastern region.The 'Neftegaz-55' tugboat that had been towing the Kolskaya rig and had taken part in the search effort, pulled out after suffering hull damage near its engine room. An icebreaker, the 'Magadan', was at the scene.Most of the missing crew were from the Russian far eastern town of Magadan, said a spokesman for AMNGR, a unit of state-owned Zarubezhneft. The company, based in the northern port of Murmansk, flew out counsellors to offer support to relatives.The rig had been doing work in the Sea of Okhotsk for a unit of state-controlled gas export monopoly Gazprom, the company said.Copyright 2011, Vancouver Sun. All rights reserved.Research and Markets: The Present and Future of GazpromBy Benzinga Staff December 16, 2011 5:02 AMRead more: (BUSINESS WIRE)-- Research and Markets () has announced the addition of the "The Present and Future of Gazprom" report to their offering. Gazprom's 2010-2011 financial results were phenomenal. An employment contract of Gazprom CEO Alexey Miller, who has been managing the gas giant for 10 years, was prolonged ahead of time for another five years. However, the country's main company found itself under powerful pressure both on the domestic and external markets. Authorities actively support expansion of NOVATEK, whose development is limited by a monopolistic character of the gas market, or, to put it differently, by the existence of Gazprom in its current form. This process unfolds without radical moves so far, considering the upcoming elections, but in the next electoral cycle serious reconstruction of the market is possible. Outside the country Gazprom is also facing problems. Moscow and Brussels have entered tough confrontation over the rules of operation on European markets, as well as over variants of gas transit from the Caspian Sea region. The question of transit through Ukraine is not solved either. There is a complicated dialogue with China. Attempts to develop relations with Japan following the Fukushima NPP catastrophe and revive the project of laying a trans-Korean gas pipeline do not promise fast and obvious dividends. Meanwhile, there is a necessity to sharply increase investments in gas production and transportation. The respite Gazprom received in the production segment during the crisis drop in the EU demand for natural gas is over. Authors of the report are leading experts in oil and gas industry. This new report elaborates on the following issues: Changes at Gazprom during A. Miller's 10 year tenure Competition with NOVATEK as one of the main intrigues Gazprom on external markets Forecast of developments Key Topics Covered: Chapter 1. How Gazprom Has Changed for 10 Years of Aleksey Miller's Rule Chapter 2. Growth of Novatek Chapter 3. Gazprom in Foreign Markets Chapter 4. War with Europe: from Nord Stream to Orientation towards Asia Chapter 5 Time of Massive Expenditure Chapter 6. Forecast. Gazprom on Path to Restructuring For more information visit Research and MarketsLaura Wood, Senior Manager,press@U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716 Read more: ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download