Ww2.justanswer.com



Strengths and Weaknesses of Educational Discipline ModelsTheoryStrengthsWeaknessesAdvantagesDisadvantagesHarry Wong: the Pragmatic Classroom. This theory is based on the belief that the students’ achievements are mainly affected by the classroom procedures used.This theory has a very clear set of procedural suggestions and specifies the actions needed (what to say, goals to have in mind, expectations, etc.).This theory is easily followed because it divides the procedures into time frames for the teachers (before school starts, the first days, the rest of the year, etc.).This theory assumes a cause-effect relationship between its principles and student actions that are not universally true.This theory focuses more on the success and behavior of the teacher (what to do when) than on the needs of the students.This theory shows everything the teacher has control over, so all teachers can apply it.Harry Wong’s theory fosters discipline and order, predictability and regularity.The main disadvantage to this theory is its rigidity. It doesn’t take differences, individual student needs, and unexpected events into account.Teachers implementing this theory may struggle with adaptation to student needs and behavior.Teaching can become a habit for the teacher, and opportunities to help each student develop their personal potential may be overlooked.Kagan, Kyle, & Scott's Win-Win Discipline: This model seeks to meet the deeper needs of the students and respond to the causes of misbehavior in addition to eliminating the interruptions.This theory has very clear expectations that are shared with the studentsThis theory has a very positive and constructive foundation.This theory brings out the potential of the students even through disciplinary action.This model fosters communication with the students which leads to increased accountability.This theory emphasizes the importance of using the classroom to help the students overcome negative attitudes and form positive skills to the extent that the traditional objective of teaching – transmission of knowledge – could be overlooked or diminished. Behavioral formation is important, but not the number one objective of the classroom.Students can reach self-fulfillment and maximize their potential as the teacher helps them transform their negative attitudes and behaviors into positive ones.This theory educates the students in emotional development and personal development as well as intellectual areas of study.If the model is applied well, the classroom will have an atmosphere of harmony, and dedication and, as a result, maximize the learning capability.Teachers using this model may be overly optimistic and then face discouragement, or place demands on the students that are too high.Students may start to depend too much on the teacher and behave in certain ways just to receive attention or certain responses… Focusing too much on attitudes can lead to spending too little time on subject content.Ronald Morrish’s Real Discipline: This model comprises of techniques and methods intended to help children be respectful, responsible, and cooperative.This model demonstrates a clear understanding of human nature and how children tend to react.This model has three clear elements – training, teaching, managing – and this makes it easily implemented and measured by the educators.This model is based on normative expectations and therefore stresses reaction more than initiation. This theory, if implemented well and accepted by the students, leads to a very functional classroom.Children raised with this model will learn respect and responsibility.Real discipline could conflict with social and legal expectations in some societies/locations.Children may not learn the meaning and importance of complying, and this could lead to future rebellion.Children might not have the room and freedom to develop their unique nesses and creativityConclusions:The Morrish and Wong discipline models are similar to the extent that they both emphasize teaching the children proper behavior using predictable and normative methods. One main difference between the two is that Wong focuses more heavily on classroom implementation and procedures (not all of which are a response to bad behavior; some just set the expectations), while Morrish focuses more specifically on methods of discipline. Morrish, however, includes more elements taking into account the reaction and needs of the child than Wong, who focuses more on an ideal classroom setting.The Win-Win model of discipline is the most positive of the three, as it leaves more room for the personal development and positive individualism of each student. Rather than focusing on meeting certain norms or expectations, the win-win method focuses on helping each student reach their maximum potential and replace any negative attitudes or tendencies with positive ones. Personal analysis:For average and above-average students, the win-win discipline model is the most effective and stimulating.For students with learning difficulties or behavioral difficulties, Wong’s pragmatic classroom and Morrish’s real discipline models may be more effective, as these students will be incapable or unwilling to respond to the win-win methods. Due to behavioral difficulties, it is essential for them to learn normative behavior so they can function normally. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download