Files.ocmboces.org
|Bioengineering Project Content Rubric |
Group Members: _____________________________
| |
|CRITERIA |WEIGHT |UNSATISFACTORY |PROFICIENT |ADVANCED |
| | |(Below Performance Standards) |(Minimal Criteria) |(Demonstrates Exceptional Performance) |
| |25% |Does not address author’s implicit and explicit | |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria … |
| | |philosophical assumptions and beliefs about |Addresses author’s implicit and explicit philosophical | |
|Literary Tie-in | |bioethics |assumptions and beliefs about bioethics |Analyzes how archetypes drawn from myth and tradition|
| | |Does not discuss how theme or meaning of novel | |influence story and can be used to justify modern |
| | |represents a view or comment on bioethics |Discusses how theme or meaning of novel represents a view or|technological research |
| | |Does not address philosophical, political, |comment on bioethics |Use of multiple textual citations to support claims |
| | |religious, ethical, and social influences of the | | |
| | |historical period that shaped the characters, |Addresses philosophical, political, religious, ethical, and | |
| | |plots, and settings of the novel and ties in |social influences of the historical period that shaped the | |
| | |current context of bioethics of today |characters, plots, and settings of the novel and ties in | |
| | | |current context of bioethics of today | |
| | | | |22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - - - - - - -|
| | |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - -|17 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 |25 |
| | |- 15 | | |
| |25% |Does not address context of public policy | |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria |
|Bioengineering | |Does not justifiy implementation of reform using |Addresses context of public policy |Thoroughly explains how policy’s ripple effect will |
| | |facts and data |Clearly justifies implementation of reform using facts and |influence multiple and indirect areas of government |
| | |Does not evaluate nature of controversy including|data |Addresses lobbying and interests of opponent |
| | |ramifications of both sides of the issue |Evaluates nature of controversy including ramifications of |Includes extensive details and research regarding |
| | |Does not address long term (bioethic) |both sides of the issue |history of policy development, legislation and social|
| | |consequences of enacted policy |Addresses long term (bioethic) consequences of enacted |response |
| | | |policy | |
| | |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - -|17 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 |22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - - - - - - -|
| | |- 15 | |25 |
| |25% |Does not address context of public policy | |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria |
|Human & Animal Cloning | |Does not justifiy implementation of reform using |Addresses context of public policy |Thoroughly explains how policy’s ripple effect will |
| | |facts and data |Clearly justifies implementation of reform using facts and |influence multiple and indirect areas of government |
| | |Does not evaluate nature of controversy including|data |Addresses lobbying and interests of opponent |
| | |ramifications of both sides of the issue |Evaluates nature of controversy including ramifications of |Includes extensive details and research regarding |
| | |Does not address long term (bioethic) |both sides of the issue |history of policy development, legislation and social|
| | |consequences of enacted policy |Addresses long term (bioethic) consequences of enacted |response |
| | | |policy | |
| | |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - -|17 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 |22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - - - - - - -|
| | |- 15 | |25 |
| |25% |Does not address context of public policy | |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria |
| | |Does not justifiy implementation of reform using |Addresses context of public policy |Thoroughly explains how policy’s ripple effect will |
|Stem Cell Research | |facts and data |Clearly justifies implementation of reform using facts and |influence multiple and indirect areas of government |
| | |Does not evaluate nature of controversy including|data |Addresses lobbying and interests of opponent |
| | |ramifications of both sides of the issue |Evaluates nature of controversy including ramifications of |Includes extensive details and research regarding |
| | |Does not address long term (bioethic) |both sides of the issue |history of policy development, legislation and social|
| | |consequences of enacted policy |Addresses long term (bioethic) consequences of enacted |response |
| | | |policy | |
| | |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - -|17 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 |22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - - - - - - -|
| | |- 15 | |25 |
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- bcps org jobs
- smartcu org sign on page
- aarp org membership card registration
- free org email accounts
- hackensackumc org pay bill
- get my transcripts org from college
- bcps org community volunteer info
- my access tgh org portal
- bcps org employee self service
- intranet florida hospital org employee
- typical finance org chart
- org chart for finance department