Files.ocmboces.org



|Bioengineering Project Content Rubric |

Group Members: _____________________________

| |

|CRITERIA |WEIGHT |UNSATISFACTORY |PROFICIENT |ADVANCED |

| | |(Below Performance Standards) |(Minimal Criteria) |(Demonstrates Exceptional Performance) |

| |25% |Does not address author’s implicit and explicit | |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria … |

| | |philosophical assumptions and beliefs about |Addresses author’s implicit and explicit philosophical | |

|Literary Tie-in | |bioethics |assumptions and beliefs about bioethics |Analyzes how archetypes drawn from myth and tradition|

| | |Does not discuss how theme or meaning of novel | |influence story and can be used to justify modern |

| | |represents a view or comment on bioethics |Discusses how theme or meaning of novel represents a view or|technological research |

| | |Does not address philosophical, political, |comment on bioethics |Use of multiple textual citations to support claims |

| | |religious, ethical, and social influences of the | | |

| | |historical period that shaped the characters, |Addresses philosophical, political, religious, ethical, and | |

| | |plots, and settings of the novel and ties in |social influences of the historical period that shaped the | |

| | |current context of bioethics of today |characters, plots, and settings of the novel and ties in | |

| | | |current context of bioethics of today | |

| | | | |22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - - - - - - -|

| | |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - -|17 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 |25 |

| | |- 15 | | |

| |25% |Does not address context of public policy | |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria |

|Bioengineering | |Does not justifiy implementation of reform using |Addresses context of public policy |Thoroughly explains how policy’s ripple effect will |

| | |facts and data |Clearly justifies implementation of reform using facts and |influence multiple and indirect areas of government |

| | |Does not evaluate nature of controversy including|data |Addresses lobbying and interests of opponent |

| | |ramifications of both sides of the issue |Evaluates nature of controversy including ramifications of |Includes extensive details and research regarding |

| | |Does not address long term (bioethic) |both sides of the issue |history of policy development, legislation and social|

| | |consequences of enacted policy |Addresses long term (bioethic) consequences of enacted |response |

| | | |policy | |

| | |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - -|17 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 |22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - - - - - - -|

| | |- 15 | |25 |

| |25% |Does not address context of public policy | |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria |

|Human & Animal Cloning | |Does not justifiy implementation of reform using |Addresses context of public policy |Thoroughly explains how policy’s ripple effect will |

| | |facts and data |Clearly justifies implementation of reform using facts and |influence multiple and indirect areas of government |

| | |Does not evaluate nature of controversy including|data |Addresses lobbying and interests of opponent |

| | |ramifications of both sides of the issue |Evaluates nature of controversy including ramifications of |Includes extensive details and research regarding |

| | |Does not address long term (bioethic) |both sides of the issue |history of policy development, legislation and social|

| | |consequences of enacted policy |Addresses long term (bioethic) consequences of enacted |response |

| | | |policy | |

| | |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - -|17 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 |22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - - - - - - -|

| | |- 15 | |25 |

| |25% |Does not address context of public policy | |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria |

| | |Does not justifiy implementation of reform using |Addresses context of public policy |Thoroughly explains how policy’s ripple effect will |

|Stem Cell Research | |facts and data |Clearly justifies implementation of reform using facts and |influence multiple and indirect areas of government |

| | |Does not evaluate nature of controversy including|data |Addresses lobbying and interests of opponent |

| | |ramifications of both sides of the issue |Evaluates nature of controversy including ramifications of |Includes extensive details and research regarding |

| | |Does not address long term (bioethic) |both sides of the issue |history of policy development, legislation and social|

| | |consequences of enacted policy |Addresses long term (bioethic) consequences of enacted |response |

| | | |policy | |

| | |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - -|17 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 |22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - - - - - - -|

| | |- 15 | |25 |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download