PDF UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT MARTIN

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT MARTIN

EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAM 2017-18 DATA GUIDEBOOK

1

Contents

2017 Tennessee Department of Education Annual Report Card............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Summary .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Domain 1 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Domain 2 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Domain 3 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Domain 4 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Domain 5 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11

2017 Tennessee Teacher Preparation Report Card ............................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Profile ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Overall ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Candidate Profile................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Employment....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Provider Impact.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14

2015-2018 Completer Data.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Undergraduate and Initial Licensure.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Job-Embedded ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

PRAXIS TESTING ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 2017-18 Student Teaching Admission/Praxis Data............................................................................................................................................................................ 22 2016-18 Praxis 1st Time Pass Rates Completers................................................................................................................................................................................. 24

TVAAS..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 2017 and 2018 TVAAS Combined ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 2018 TVAAS with 2013-16 Completers .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 28 2017 TVAAS with 2012-15 Completers .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 31

2018 CAEP/AIMS Annual Reporting....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 SKYFACTOR SURVEYS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 36

2

ALUMNI SURVEY ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 36 Top Priority..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Maintain or Improve ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Monitor .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Institution Specific Questions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 39

Exit Survey.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Top Priority..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Maintain or Improve ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Monitor .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44

Employer Survey ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 45 TQP Grant Goals/Learning Objectives ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 School Counseling Data.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Individual Program/Campus Disaggregation ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 2017-18 E.P.P. Data Presentations ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 49 Spring 2018 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 49 Summer 2018 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 2017-18 UTM E.P.P. Strengths ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 2018-19 Recommended Continuous Improvement Goals .................................................................................................................................................................... 51

3

2017 Tennessee Department of Education Annual Report Card

Summary

Annual Reports are more extensive than the TN Teacher Preparation Report Card. Each domain has accountability metrics. Those metrics have benchmark criteria to be met set by the state. Aggregates performance within and across domains to determine whether an E.P.P. meets domain-specific and overall expectations. E.P.P.'s that have 2 consecutive performance reports that do not meet expectations will be engaged in an interim review process. UTM met expectations for all 5 domains. Data contains 2013-16 completers.

Domain 1

Benchmark 1: 95% of UG candidates admitted by passing score on ACT or all 3 CORE. This means only 5% of completers can be admitted on appeal to meet benchmark (roughly 6 per year by the numbers). UTM had 80.7% with above 21+ ACT or Pass all 3 CORE tests, 14.3% away from the benchmark. Percent with ACT 21+ UTM 73.2%, State 81.9%. We have trended up over the 3 year period, as has the state. CORE Math (34.5%) and Writing (57.1%) have been noticeably bad at 1st time pass rate. CORE Reading (83.6% has had good 1st time rates).

Benchmark 2: 95% of UG candidates admitted with 2.75+ GPA. Average UG GPA at completion must be 3.0+. Percentage of candidates with 2.75+ UG GPA at admission 99.7%. 5.5% better than state.

Benchmark 3: Underrepresented race at 22% or increase over a 3-yr period. Job-embedded produces more diverse completers at 10.1% (state 29.5%) compared to initial licensure at 5.8% (state 9.6%). The state average doesn't even meet their established benchmark, which is an unfair benchmark to achieve. UTM produces 92.5% white completers, and 7% African American completers.

Benchmark 4: 22%+ male completers or increase over a 3-yr period. 30.2% of UTM completers are male, 1.2% higher than the state average. 48.8% (n=80) of jobembedded completers are male (state job-embedded 33.3%). 24.4% (n=295) of initial licensure completers are male. Benchmark exceeded by both routes. 201516 completers did show a 4.8% drop (31.7% to 26.9%) in male completers from 2014-15. The TN average dropped similarly from 32.2% to 27.4%. UTM should see a bump back up in the 2018 TDOE Annual Report . 2016-17 job-embedded had 36.4% male completers, and initial licensure had 26.9% male completers .The 2016-17 program completers combined yielded a 29.9% male completer rate.

Benchmark 5: High needs endorsement area completers (STEM, SPED, Languages) percentage is either in the upper quartile of the state or show an increase over a 3-yr period. NOTICE: State averages don't add up overall to the yearly. UTM meets benchmark with 3-year increase from 12.9% to 16.2%. The positive growth trend should continue, as out of the 174 completers UTM had in 2016-17, 19% of completers came from high need areas . Job-embedded has a higher completer percentage of high need areas at 30% (n=80) (state 44.7%) of job-embedded completers are endorsed in high need areas, compared to initial licensure's 9.2% (n=295) (TN average 20%). Both routes have shown to meet benchmark with increase over 3-yr period. 2016-17 completer data shows 45.5% of job-embedded completers come from high need areas, continuing the growth they've shown (2014-15 was 27%, 2015-16 was 32.6%). Only 6.7% of initial licensure completers derive from high need areas, showing a decrease from the previous 2 years growth (2014-15 was 8.2%, 2015-16 was 10.6%).

4

Admissions Assessment Percentage with ACT 21+ Average GRE Score Percentage Passed Praxis CORE Reading Percentage Passed Praxis CORE Writing Percentage Passed Praxis CORE Math Percentage of candidates with 2.75+ undergraduate GPA Average undergraduate GPA

Domain 1- Candidate Recruitment & Selection

UTM Average

State Average

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 n=

2013-16 UTM State Gain/Loss

67.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

74.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

78.3% 993.5 100.0% 57.1% 57.1%

74.0%

100.0% 100.0% 99.7%

100.0% 3.41

99.5% 3.41

99.4% 3.41

98.5% 3.44

82.6%

99.7% 97.8% 98.3%

91.6% 3.44

87.0% 1024.3 99.5% 95.1% 94.3%

92.5% 3.44

478 73.2% 81.9% 28 1001.1 1051.3 142 100.0% 99.6% 132 95.5% 97.7% 124 95.2% 97.2%

600 99.7% 94.2% 600 3.41 3.44

-8.7% -50.2 0.4% -2.2% -2.0%

5.5% -0.03

Race/Ethnicity Percentage of Completers in Underrepresented Race/Ethnicity

Percentage of Asian Completers

Percentage of African American Completers

Percentage of Hispanic Completers Percentage of Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Completers Percentage of Native American/Alaskan Native Completers

Percentage of Non-Hispanic/White Completers

Percentage of Completers of Two or More Races

9.0% 0.0% 8.5% 0.5%

0.0%

0.0% 91.0% 0.0%

5.1% 0.0% 4.6% 0.5%

0.0%

0.0% 94.9% 0.0%

8.4% 0.0% 7.8% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0% 91.6% 0.0%

17.0% 4.1% 9.6% 2.0%

0.0%

0.7% 83.0% 0.7%

15.0% 2.1% 6.3% 4.9%

0.1%

0.5% 84.8% 1.3%

19.4% 3.1% 12.7% 2.7%

0.0%

0.2% 80.6% 0.8%

573 7.5% 16.3% 573 0.0% 2.5% 573 7.0% 10.1% 573 0.5% 2.5%

573 0.0% 0.0%

573 0.0% 0.4% 573 92.5% 83.6% 573 0.0% 0.9%

-8.8% -2.5% -3.1% -2.0%

0.0%

-0.4% 8.9% -0.9%

Gender Percentage of Male Completers Percentage of Female Completers

31.1% 68.9%

31.7% 68.3%

26.9% 73.1%

32.1% 67.9%

32.2% 67.8%

27.4% 72.6%

600 30.2% 29.0% 600 69.8% 71.0%

1.2% -1.2%

High Needs Endorsement Areas Percentage of Completers Endorsed in High-Needs Subject Area

12.9%

11.5%

16.2%

30.8%

30.9%

31.2%

600 13.3% 27.1% -13.8%

5

Domain 2

Benchmark: 85% employed for at least 2 out of 3 years post completion. We are exceeding the state average in all categories, with 3-yr employment rate showing the most significant gap from the state average.

Domain 2- Employment and Retention

UTM Average

State Average

2013-16

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 n= UTM State Gain/Loss

Any year employment rate

81.8% 81.6% 86.7% 75.8% 77.1% 75.3% 576 83.2% 75.7% 7.5%

First year employment rate

67.9% 67.2% 86.1% 64.7% 67.6% 69.7% 576 72.9% 67.3% 5.6%

Any two year employment rate 95.1% 93.4% 100.0% 92.0% 93.5% 95.3% 342 95.0% 93.6% 1.4%

All three year employment rate 91.5% 78.8% 100.0% 79.6% 72.5% 100.0% 199 90.5% 79.3% 11.2%

6

Domain 3

Benchmark: 90% of completers pass identified Praxis II test by 2nd attempt. UTM met expectation in this domain. Only test to truly note is the 5203 Reading Elementary Education test, which has been on the rise over the three year period and should exceed state identified benchmark in coming years (see Praxis first time pass rate).

Domain 3- Candidate Assessment

UTM Average

State Average

2013-16

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 n= UTM State Gain/Loss

Pedagogical Assessment

*Stat Correction

584 95.5%

Percentage passed PLT Early childhood

100.0%

100.0%

94.0% 100.0%

35 100.0% 95.3% 4.7%

Percentage passed PLT K-6

92.4%

95.1%

97.3% 93.9% 96.1% 95.6% 261 94.6% 95.8% -1.2%

Percentage passed PLT 5-9

96.0%

84.0%

95.0% 96.1% 94.5% 96.8% 70 91.4% 95.3% -3.9%

Percentage passed PLT 7-12

86.9%

91.5%

100.0% 97.3% 97.3% 97.3% 218 91.7% 97.4% -5.7%

Literacy Assessment

Percentage passed Reading Elementary Ed

Percentage passed Reading Across the Curriculum Elementary

78.4% 95.6%

88.9%

94.8%

95.9%

95.4%

315 97.5% 94.7% 246 89.0% 95.5%

-6.5%

97.3%

69 95.7% 92.7% 3.0%

Specialty Area Assessment Percentage passed Agriculture Percentage passed Art Content Analysis Percentage passed Biology Content Knowledge Percentage passed Education of Young Children

100.0%

99.4%

804 93.2% 16 87.5% 85.6% 15 93.3% 84.8% 10 100.0% 90.3% 32 96.9% 98.9%

1.9% 8.5% 9.7% -2.0%

7

Percentage passed Elementary Education Content Knowledge

97.3%

Percentage passed Elementary Ed Curriculum, Instruct,

Assessment

87.1%

Percentage passed English Lang Lit Comp Content Knowledge

63.6%

Percentage passed Health Education

100.0%

Percentage passed Math Content Knowledge

Percentage passed Middle School Content Knowledge 55.6%

Percentage passed Music Content and Instruction

Percentage passed Physical Ed Content and Design

70.6%

Percentage passed Spanish World Lang

Percentage passed Spec Edu Core Knowledge and Mild

to Mod

84.6%

Percentage passed World & US History Content Knowledge

90.0%

91.9% 93.8% 80.0% 100.0% 75.0% 78.6% 61.1%

100.0%

85.1% 97.7% 96.8% 88.4% 216 91.7% 94.2% -2.5%

100.0% 94.6% 95.9% 96.1% 206 92.7% 96.0% -3.3%

93.8%

93.6% 97.8%

94.1%

84.3%

96.6%

34 76.5% 95.8%

97.7%

29 100.0% 98.7%

14 42.9% 71.7%

95.8% 95.1% 54 74.1% 96.1%

81.6%

32 71.9% 75.7%

72.3%

44 65.9% 75.8%

10 70.0% 84.0%

-19.3% 1.3% -28.8% -22.0% -3.8% -9.9% -14.0%

100.0% 98.6%

96.6% 35 94.3% 98.3% -4.0%

97.9% 98.2%

29 96.6% 97.4% -0.8%

8

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download