The Social and Economic Value of Cultural Heritage ...

The Social and Economic Value of Cultural Heritage: literature review

by Cornelia D?mcke and Mikhail Gnedovsky EENC Paper, July 2013

The Social and Economic Value of Cultural Heritage: literature review by Cornelia D?mcke and Mikhail Gnedovsky

EENC Paper, July 2013

This document has been prepared by Cornelia D?mcke and Mikhail Gnedovsky on behalf of the European Expert Network on Culture (EENC). Support has been provided by Jordi Balt?, Leonid Yakon Abadzhev and Marina Castell? (Interarts).

This paper reflects the views only of the EENC authors and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

The EENC was set up in 2010 at the initiative of Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission (DG EAC), with the aim of contributing to the improvement of policy development in Europe. It provides advice and support to DG EAC in the analysis of cultural policies and their implications at national, regional and European levels. The EENC involves 17 independent experts and is coordinated by Interarts and Culture Action Europe.

About the authors

Dr. Cornelia D?mcke is a cultural economist and works as a project developer and arts consultant. She is the founder of Culture Concepts, an independent institute based in Berlin, providing research and consultancy services for clients in both the cultural and the development sector. Her thematic specialisation focuses particularly on issues of culture and development, cultural economy, cultural tourism, as well as on the museum, theatre and festival market. In the museum and cultural heritage sector she has conducted several applied research studies and has developed museum concepts. In 2011, she was nominated to the pool of experts in the field of cultural policies, set up by UNESCO Paris in the context of the implementation of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. Since 2011, she is a member of the European Expert Network on Culture (EENC). See cultureconcepts.de.

Dr Mikhail Gnedovsky is Director of Cultural Policy Institute, an independent agency based in Moscow, Russia, which specialises in cultural strategies development and cultural policy research. He is a member of the Board of Trustees of the European Museum Forum (EMF), a UK-based organisation that has been presenting, since 1977, the European Museum of the Year Award (EMYA). He chaired the EMF Board in 2010?2012, and has been a member of the EMYA Jury since 2002. He is a member of the Board of ICOM Russia and of the Jury of the Cultural Policy Research Award (CPRA). Over the years, he has worked as an expert in several programmes of the Council of Europe. Since 2011, he is a member of the European Expert Network on Culture (EENC).

2

The Social and Economic Value of Cultural Heritage: literature review by Cornelia D?mcke and Mikhail Gnedovsky

EENC Paper, July 2013

Contents

1. Introduction

4

1.1. Methodology

5

1.2. Scope

6

2. Literature review

9

3. Main findings and conclusions

135

3.1. General perspectives

135

3.2. Heritage-based strategies and benefits for stakeholders

136

3.3. The economic value of cultural heritage

138

3.4. The social value of cultural heritage

139

3.5. The role of heritage in the context of smart, inclusive and sustainable growth

141

3.6. The need for further research and documentation

142

Acknowledgements

144

3

The Social and Economic Value of Cultural Heritage: literature review by Cornelia D?mcke and Mikhail Gnedovsky

EENC Paper, July 2013

1. Introduction

This bibliography aims to describe and analyse academic literature and research reports addressing the social and economic value of cultural heritage, in order to allow the European Commission's Directorate General for Education and Culture (DG EAC) to identify relevant arguments, current theoretical approaches and also experts in this field.

The analysis places emphasis on publications made over the past five years within the EU but also includes references from other countries or regions as well as earlier publications which can be relevant to current debates in Europe.

The paper has been prepared following a request presented by DG EAC to the European Expert Network on Culture (EENC) in February 2013. The request emerged in the context of the implementation of 2007's European Agenda for Culture in a Globalising World, which highlights the potential of the cultural sector (including cultural and creative industries, but also cultural heritage) to social and economic development and aims to improve the availability of data in these fields. On the other hand, the request stressed the importance of the Europe 2020 strategy, the EU's mid-term growth strategy which aims to address the shortcomings of the existing growth model and to create the conditions of smarter, more sustainable and more inclusive growth ? the cultural sectors are also expected to contribute to these aims.1 A draft version of the literature review was presented in May 2013 and, following comments formulated by DG EAC, a revised text is submitted in July 2013.

The EENC has produced some literature reviews in the past, including one on `the governance of culture'2 and one on `the public value of culture',3 both presented in January 2012. Some findings of the latter, conducted by Jordi Balt? and John Holden, are also relevant to this review on the social and cultural value of cultural heritage.

1 See `Council Conclusions on the Contributon of Culture to the Implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy', Official Journal of the European Union, C 175, 15.6.2011. Available at . 2 Vesna Copic and Andrej Srakar, Cultural Governance: a literature review (EENC, 2012), available at . 3 John Holden and Jordi Balt?, The Public Value of Culture: a literature review (EENC, 2012), available at .

4

The Social and Economic Value of Cultural Heritage: literature review by Cornelia D?mcke and Mikhail Gnedovsky

EENC Paper, July 2013

1.1. Methodology

The literature review has been carried out by a team led by EENC members Cornelia D?mcke and Mikhail Gnedovsky, with support provided by Interarts as the secretariat of the EENC. Given the aim to present a broad and diverse list of documents, a request for contributions was disseminated in March 2013 to several networks and individual experts, including European members of the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies (IFACCA), some correspondents of the Council of Europe / Ericarts' Compendium on Cultural Policies and Trends in Europe and experts in the EENC's core group.4 The request presented the main aims of the exercise and asked for assistance in identifying relevant recent documents (e.g. papers, articles, evaluation reports, impact studies) addressing these issues, preferably within the EU.

Contributions received thereafter were listed and briefly analysed, before selecting the 87 documents that would be included in the final review. An effort was made to ensure diversity both as regards the countries represented and the areas of impact and arguments analysed. Following this, the research team has closely analysed the texts selected, producing a short summary for each. When preparing the individual reviews, priority has been given to the methodology used as well as the economic, social and broader impacts identified, in relation with the EU's objectives of smart, inclusive and sustainable growth.

Documents reviewed are presented in alphabetical order, with a full bibliographic reference, a translation of the original title where this was not in English and an Internet address in most cases.5 Where relevant, information has also been included regarding the context in which research had been undertaken (e.g. European projects, national policy developments, international conferences, etc.) or the authors' broader work in this field. A short description of the authors and their institutional affiliation is included for each item, in order to facilitate the European Commission's identification of experts in this field.

Some of the trends and key observations derived from the literature review are presented in the final chapter.

4 The contributors' names appear in Acknowledgements at the end of this document. 5 Internet references contained throughout the document are valid as of early May 2013.

5

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download