DRAFT TOWN OF NAGS HEAD



TOWN OF NAGS HEAD

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

ADJOURNED REGULAR SESSION

June 21, 2006

The Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners met in the Board Room at the Nags Head Municipal Complex at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, June 21, 2006.

COMRS PRESENT: Mayor Renée Cahoon; Mayor Pro Tem Anna Sadler; Comr. Wayne Gray;

Comr. Bob Oakes; and Comr. Doug Remaley

COMRS ABSENT: None

OTHERS PRESENT: Town Manager Seth Lawless; Town Attorney Ike McRee; Public Safety Director Charlie Cameron; Butch Osborne; Ralph Barile; Kim Kenny; Tim Wilson; Todd Krafft; Roberta Thuman; Bob Muller; Paul Rotchford; Matt Artz; and Town Clerk Carolyn Morris

CALL TO ORDER

Mayor Cahoon called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.

AUDIENCE RESPONSE

Town Attorney Ike McRee announced Audience Response open.

Paul Rotchford, Nags Head resident; feels that the Town should not consider purchasing a dredge for beach nourishment; dredging should remain in the private sector’s hands; in view of legal issues with lobbyists, he stated that now would not be a good time to renew the Town’s agreement with the Washington DC lobbyist firm.

CONSENT AGENDA

The Consent Agenda consisted of the following items:

- Consideration of Budget Adjustment #12 to FY 05/06 Operating Budget

- Consideration of Tax Adjustment Report

- Consideration of amendments to the Consolidated Fee Schedule

- Addition of civil penalties for violations of certain Town Code sections

- Addition of facility fees

- Consideration of proposed position reclassification for Facilities Maintenance Supervisor from Grade 14 to Facilities Maintenance Superintendent Grade 17; and Deputy Public Works Director from Grade 21 to 24

Mayor Cahoon noted that staff has asked that Item #4 - Consideration of amendments to the Consolidated Fee Schedule - be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda.

MOTION: Comr. Remaley made a motion to withdraw agenda item #5 - Consideration of proposed position reclassification for Facilities Maintenance Supervisor and Deputy Public Works Director - be removed from the Consent Agenda and included under his agenda for discussion later in the meeting. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sadler which passed unanimously.

MOTION: Comr. Remaley made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. The motion was seconded by Comr. Gray which passed unanimously.

A copy of Budget Adjustment #12, as adopted, is attached to and made a part of these minutes as shown in Addendum “A”.

A copy of the Tax Adjustment Report, as approved, is attached to and made a part of these minutes as shown in Addendum “B”.

RECOGNITION OF FORMER MAYOR BOB MULLER

On behalf of the Board, Mayor Cahoon welcomed former Mayor Bob Muller to the Board meeting.

Adoption of FY 06/07 Town Operating Budget

Adoption of Beach Access Project Ordinance

Adoption of Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY 06/07 through FY 10/11

Town Manager Seth Lawless explained that the proposed budget for the FY 06/07 was distributed to Board members earlier today; he summarized the changes to the budget for Board members.

Town Manager Lawless asked that the Board adopt the FY 06/07 Town Operating Budget, the Capital Project Ordinance for beach/sound accesses noting that the Forrest Street Sound Access was not funded by the Division of Coastal Management (DCM), and the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as presented.

Comr. Oakes complimented staff on saving money in the health insurance benefit item; at one point he had concern about the fund balance but after a review of the history, he now has no issues.

MOTION: Comr. Gray made a motion to adopt the FY 06/07 Town Operating Budget, the Capital Project Ordinance for beach/sound accesses, and the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY 06/07 through FY 10/11 as presented. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sadler and Comr. Remaley.

Comr. Gray questioned why DCM would not fund the Forrest Street access; Planning Director Tim Wilson explained that the Forrest Street access has a very limited public benefit. Mayor Cahoon asked staff to apply again next year for Forrest Street emphasizing in the DCM application that the purpose is to make the access a more pedestrian-friendly access.

CONTINUATION OF MOTION: The motion passed unanimously.

A copy of the FY 06/07 Town Operating Budget, the Capital Project Ordinance for Beach/Sound Accesses, and the Capital Improvement Plan for FY 06/07 through FY 10/11, as adopted, are attached to and made a part of these minutes as shown in Addendum "C".

On behalf of the Board, Mayor Cahoon thanked staff for their time and efforts in preparation of the budget.

Update on Septic Health Initiative - Water Quality Coordinator Todd Krafft

Water Quality Coordinator Todd Krafft provided an update of the Septic Health Initiative program. He reported that 1147 water quality samples were taken this past year; education participation increased; a portion of his presentation focused on the importance of the replacement of the sand bottom septic tanks; replacement of one of the sand bottom septic tanks would cost approximately $3,000 based on current market conditions.

Mayor Cahoon commended Mr. Krafft for the job he is doing for the program.

Beach Nourishment

Consideration of Emergency Local Project

Selection of Bond Counsel

Consideration of Extension of Beach Nourishment Lobbyist Contract

Mayor Cahoon stated that she attended the recent Dare County Board meeting and while two (2) Commissioners (Comr. Johnson and Comr. Judge) were willing to consider funding for the Town for beach nourishment, there were not enough votes to amend the agenda and there would not be enough votes to defeat any motion that came forward. The Dare County Board stated that they would not entertain any request from the Town of Nags Head for any funds for a beach nourishment project because they felt timing was bad and it was an election year.

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler summarized that the Dare County Board would not allow the Town to make the request for funds which she felt was very discourteous; she expressed her disappointment.

It was Board consensus to move forward with the permitting process for the emergency project and to continue to work to secure 25% funding from Dare County. It was noted that the Dare County Shoreline Protection Commission meets next week and Comr. Gray is to push for more activity on the Commission; the last two (2) meetings have not had a quorum.

Lobbyist contract

The Town’s contract with Washington, DC lobbyist Marlowe and Co. expires July 1, 2006.

It was Board consensus to consider renewal of the Marlowe and Co. lobbyist contract at the July 5, 2006 Board meeting; some response from the Shoreline Commission is expected by that time.

ITEMS REFERRED TO AND PRESENTATIONS FROM TOWN ATTORNEY

Town Attorney Ike McRee had nothing new to report.

ITEMS REFERRED TO AND PRESENTATIONS FROM TOWN MANAGER

Town Manager Seth Lawless - Request to amend Town Code Sec. 14-8. Prohibitions and restrictions generally - Enactment of price gouging ordinance following declared State of Emergency

Public Safety Director Charlie Cameron summarized the agenda summary sheet which read in part as follows:

“Request the Board adopt the attached ordinance prohibiting "price gouging" during a declared State of Emergency. Any restrictions imposed shall extend for up to ninety (90) days following the date of declaration of the State of Emergency unless terminated sooner by proclamation.”

MOTION: Comr. Remaley made a motion to adopt the ordinance amending the Town Code concerning price gouging following a declared State of Emergency as presented. The motion was seconded by Comr. Gray which passed unanimously.

The ordinance concerning price gouging, as adopted, is attached to and made a part of these minutes as shown in Addendum "D".

Town Manager Seth Lawless - Request to rescind Town Code Sec. 32-4. Reconstruction task force

Public Safety Director Charlie Cameron summarized the agenda summary sheet which read in part as follows:

“Attached please find a proposed ordinance which would rescind Section 4 of Chapter 32 - Reconstruction task force.

‘Staff will be available to answer any questions/inquiries the Board may have.”

MOTION: Comr. Remaley made a motion to adopt the ordinance rescinding the Town Code section concerning Reconstruction task force as presented. The motion was seconded by Comr. Gray which passed unanimously.

A copy of the ordinance concerning Reconstruction task force, as adopted, is attached to and made a part of these minutes as shown in Addendum "E".

Town Manager Seth Lawless - Request for Trench Box

Town Manager Seth Lawless summarized the memo from Safety Officer Kevin Zorc dated May 19, 2006 which read in part as follows:

“The Nags Head water distribution staff is regularly involved in excavations of water mains to repair or install new equipment. Staff attend annual trenching and shoring training, and are designated as competent operators. During the course of this training, much emphasis is placed on the value of trench boxes for safety. A trench box may be placed in the trench to prevent trench failures from injuring workers. A trench box consists of large plates, made of metal, which are installed parallel to the walls of the trench, and horizontal cross-members which hold the plates apart. The lower edge of the box rests on the bottom of the trench, and the top edge extends above the tope of the trench. The workers stay between the plates of the trench box, so that if the wall of the trench collapses, the dirt will be stopped by the trench box.

‘Trenching and shoring infractions are among the most commonly cited OSHA violations in North Carolina. Additionally, OSHA places special compliance emphasis on excavations in our area due to their increased risk of collapse as compared to other parts of North Carolina. Dare County soils are classified as “C” grade, the most dangerous and collapse prone soil type in North Carolina.

‘I encourage the use of trench boxes in the Nags Head Water Distribution Division. This need was underscored last year by a near miss incident, without a trench box, involving the potentially catastrophic water/sand engulfment of a Nags Head Water Distribution worker. The existing trench box is too heavy (steel construction) for staff to manage safely, and allows staff to work at a maximum depth of four feet deep. A new technology exists that enables trench box construction be completed as needed, in sections, dependent on the depth and width of the trench. I endorse the acquisition of this new trench box technology, and believe that it will make our efforts efficient and most importantly, safe.

‘Currently Nags Head Water distribution is involved with installation of new fire hydrants. Due to roadway and multi use pathway location, these final 6 hydrant installations will require the use of a trench box to safely complete the job. Completion of the excavation without a trench box would require major demolition of the bike path and roadway to obtain the proper spoil slope necessary to comply with OSHA standards.

‘Three quoted prices for the unit, shipping and sales tax for an “Efficiency Build a Box” trench box are as follows:

‘Stafford Equipment - $16, 071

United Rentals – $21,804.04

Coble Trench Safety - $18,490

‘Of these three quotes, Water Distribution Supervision Ray Midgett recommends we choose the Stafford Equipment quote, for $16,071.

‘Additionally, a trench box system may be rented from United Rentals, for a month, for about $3100. This would enable Water Distribution to complete the project, and gain product insight regarding possible future purchase of the system. Rental fees incurred are not applicable towards the purchase price of a new Efficiency Trench Box system.”

MOTION: Comr. Oakes made a motion to approve staff’s request to purchase a trench box as presented. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sadler which passed unanimously.

MAYOR’S AGENDA

Mayor Cahoon - CAC Public Forum

Mayor Cahoon reported that the CAC public forum on the new flood maps is scheduled for Tuesday, June 27, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room.

Mayor Cahoon - National Clean Beaches Week

Mayor Cahoon presented the National Clean Beaches Week proclamation. She noted that a beach cleanup will take place at the Bonnett Street and the Coquina Beach accesses on July 5th.

MOTION: Comr. Remaley made a motion to adopt the National Clean Beaches Week Proclamation as presented. The motion was seconded by Comr. Oakes.

Ralph Barile explained that the Dare County web site has detailed information about Clean Beaches Week; he explained further that staff will be picking up the trash bags at the end of the day on July 5th.

CONTINUATION OF MOTION: The motion passed unanimously.

The proclamation, as adopted, read in part as follows:

"A PROCLAMATION NATIONAL CLEAN BEACHES WEEK JUNE 28, 2006 - JULY 5, 2006

'WHEREAS, according to the document entitled `Turning to the Sea: America's Ocean Future', published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, coastal areas produce 85 percent of all tourism revenue in the United States and beaches are the leading tourism destination in the country, AND;

'WHEREAS, beaches provide recreational opportunities for numerous citizens and their families, as well as international tourists who, according to the document entitled `The Beach and Your Coastal Watershed' (EPA document number 842-F-98-010), published by the Environmental Protection Agency, together make almost 2,000,000,000 trips to the beach each year to fish, sunbathe, boat, swim, surf, and birdwatch, AND;

'WHEREAS, according to the Army Corps of Engineers, the beaches of the United States are a critical component of the national economy, including global competitiveness, AND;

'WHEREAS, beaches represent a critical part of the natural heritage and a beautiful part of the landscape of the United States, AND

'WHEREAS, beaches are sensitive ecosystems that are susceptible to degradation and alteration from pollution, sewage, and improper use, AND;

'WHEREAS, coastal tourism and healthy seafood foster robust economies that sustain communities and support jobs throughout the coastal regions of the United States, AND;

'WHEREAS, members of the Federal Government, the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, and citizen volunteers have worked hard to clean and protect the beaches of the United States, AND;

'WHEREAS, according to the United States Geological Survey, great progress has been made in understanding the science of watersheds and the connections between inland areas and coastal waters, AND;

'WHEREAS, the Federal Government should develop science-based policies that are commensurate with that knowledge.

'NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Nags Head Board of Commissioners does hereby:

(1) Designate the period beginning on June 28, 2006 and ending on July 5, 2006 as National Clean Beaches Week;

(2) Recognize the value of beaches to the way of life of the citizens of the United States; and

the important contributions of beaches to the economy, recreation, and natural environment of the United States;

(3) Encourage all citizens of the United States to work to keep beaches, a critical part of the natural

heritage of the United States, safe and clean for the continued enjoyment of the public."

 

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA

Comr. Remaley - Consideration of proposed position reclassification for Facilities Maintenance Supervisor from Grade 14 to Facilities Maintenance Superintendent Grade 17; and Deputy Public Works Director from Grade 21 to 24 (Item removed from Consent Agenda)

The memo from Town Manager Seth Lawless was presented to the Board and read in part as follows:

“The Town commissioned Springsted, Incorporated to conduct a pay and classification study, which was completed in early 2005. The report recommended a number of position reclassifications, which were reviewed and adopted by the Board of Commissioners in July, 2005. In reviewing the study and having had the opportunity to observe Town operations since last August, I believe that the Springsted study overlooked two positions that should have been raised to the level of their counterparts in other Divisions and/or Departments. I’m recommending the following:

‘Public Facilities Maintenance Supervisor – Reclassify to Superintendent, Grade 17. This position is currently classified at Grade 14, while the other Supervisor positions in Public Works are currently Grade 15. Further, Facilities Maintenance is the only Division within Public Works that does not have a Superintendent position, despite the fact that it has the second most employees of the 5 divisions within Public Works. The duties and responsibilities are similar to the other Superintendents’ positions as well as the knowledge, skills and abilities required to perform the jobs.

‘Deputy Public Works Director – Reclassify to Grade 24. This position is currently classified at Grade 21, while all other Deputy Department Head positions are classified at Grade 24. The duties and responsibilities are similar to the other Deputy Department Head positions as well as the knowledge, skills and abilities required to perform the jobs.

‘No change in salary will take place for either position if the recommendations are accepted; however, the change will allow future advancement beyond the existing top pay of the current classifications.”

MOTION: Comr. Remaley made a motion to adhere to the Town Personnel Policy and to include the appropriate pay raises with the position reclassifications for Facilities Maintenance Superintendent Grade 17 and Deputy Public Works Director Grade 24. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sadler which passed 4 - 1 with Comr. Oakes casting the NO vote.

Comr. Remaley - Government Access Channel Committee meeting

Comr. Remaley reported that he and Administrative Assistant/PIO Roberta Thuman recently attended a Government Access Channel Committee (GACC) meeting. The following resulted from the meeting:

- The Committee is testing out the use of a cable music channel that does not contain any fundraising/advertising

- There was not enough consensus to do away with the “crawl” at the bottom of the screen

- Updated Town software is needed for Ms. Thuman to communicate with GAC software to update the GAC screens; staff is to prepare a detailed request with cost estimate for Board consideration

Comr. Gray - Report/recommendations from Zoning Ordinance Review Committee

The memo from Planning and Development Director Tim Wilson dated June 12, 2006 was presented to the Board and read in part as follows:

“Included herein is a list of the proposed zoning ordinance changes that have been discussed and agreed upon by the Committee. These recommended changes will be presented by Commissioner Wayne Gray at the June 21, 2006 Board of Commissioners meeting for review and consideration by the full Board. Should the Board decide to accept and move forward with any or all of the Committee’s recommendations, the next step in the process would be for staff to prepare the recommended changes in ordinance form, present the proposed ordinance to the Planning Board for review and recommendation, and then forward to the Board of Commissioners for public hearing final action. The recommended zoning text changes are as follows:

‘Sections 48-7: Definition of Height.

In August 2005 the Board of Commissioners amended Town Code Section 34, Stormwater Management. This amendment placed limitations on the amount of fill which could be placed on a development lot based upon the flood zone designation of the property. This change created a conflict with the definition of “height” as found in Chapter 48, Zoning. If located in a flood hazard area, Section 34 limits that fill can only be used to raise the property to the designated base flood elevation (BFE). However, the illustration and definition of height in Chapter 48 shows that fill can be used to bring the elevation of the site in a flood hazard area to BFE plus two more feet. This conflict in the zoning height definition needs to be removed so that it is consistent with the requirements in Chapter 34, which is the more restrictive of the two regulations. The language in the current height definition and its length also makes it uneasy to read and understand and staff will try to develop a more concise and easy to read definition.

‘Section 48-78: Yard requirements, accessory outdoor recreation uses.

This section provides that accessory outdoor recreation uses, such as tennis court and swimming pools, are required to meet the same setback requirements of the principal use found on the property. Other types of accessory uses are permitted to be located within five feet of a side or rear property line. Outdoor pools, an increasingly common residential accessory use, are required to meet principal structure setbacks. Pools, pursuant to the Building Code, are also required to have a safety fence. If a property owner wants to construct a pool and also desires to have a perimeter fence along his property line for other reasons, the result can be fences located within fences. A typical principal residential use side yard requirement is eight or ten feet. It is recommended that pools and other outdoor accessory uses be afforded the same setbacks enjoyed by all other accessory uses. It is not clear what the negative impact of an accessory outdoor recreation uses may be that warrants additional setback, and even less clear how a mere distance of an additional three to five feet of setback would make an appreciable difference in mitigating any negative impact.

‘Sections 48-482 &483: Buffering regulations, minimum initial height and spacing of trees.

The town has several different types of buffer yard requirements, with different types of buffer yards designed to mitigate certain impacts by different land uses. Plantings in buffer yards can vary from any single or combination of plant species ranging from grasses, shrubs, forbs and trees. Each buffer yard prescribes the location and minimum dimensions of the buffer yard, the types and percentages of required plants, and minimum plant heights at original planting, which may be less in height than the mature buffer. Current requirements for the majority of tree plantings within a buffer yard are that the trees are to be planted on five foot centers. Some of the more commonly applied buffer yards provide that trees can be planted at a height of no less than three feet, but must reach a height of five feet within three years. Developer complaints are that the five foot center spacing requirement is too close. And staffs difficulty is trying to enforce that the buffer yard achieve a height of five feet within three years. It is recommended that for all buffer yards requiring trees that (1) the spacing of trees within a buffer yard be increased from five foot centers to ten foot centers, and (2) the minimum height of a tree at planting for any buffer yard be increased from three feet to no less than five feet.

‘Section 48-523: Time limitations for approved site plans and zoning permits.

Zoning Permits issued by the Zoning Administrator and site plans approved by the Board of Commissioners are valid for a period of six months. Zoning Permit approvals and site plan approvals shall be extended by the Planning Director for an additional six months upon request provided there have been no ordinance changes that make the project nonconforming. Even if ordinance changes have occurred that would render the project nonconforming, the applicant can still petition the Board of Commissioners to grant an extension approval provided the site plan has not actually expired. Under this Section as presently written a person desiring to make either a zoning permit approval or site plan approval valid for one year is virtually guaranteed such approval, provided they follow all the required steps.

This Section also provides that even when a building permit is secured pursuant to an approved zoning permit or site plan, that if all work is not completed within 18 months form the date of the building permit issuance, then the zoning approval shall be considered expired and the building permit revoked. This causes the permitting of the project to begin all over again in making original applications for zoning and building permit approvals.

It is recommended that this Section be changed to (1) make zoning permit and site plan approvals valid for one year with no further extensions permitted, and (2) rescinding the requirement that that the zoning approval be revoked if all work is not completed within 18 months of the issuance of the building permit.

‘Section 48-661: Motion to amend, zoning map amendments.

Under this Section any individual may submit a zoning map amendment request for any property or combination of properties, regardless of whether or not they own the property requested for rezoning, have the property owners consent, or even if the property owner is opposed. It is recommended that this Section be changed to specify that a zoning map amendment may be initiated by either (1) the Board of Commissioners, (2) the Planning Board, or (3) the owner of the property, or his designated agent, for which the rezoning is being requested.

‘Sections 48-525, 48-526, & 48-661: Public notification requirements for Conditional Use Permit Applications, Vested Right Applications, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment Applications.

Conditional Use Permit Applications, Vested Right Applications, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment applications all require public notification requirements under the Town Code prior to hearing and action by the Board. While each of these three types of applications has notification requirements, these notification requirements which may include newspaper advertisements and letters to property owners and adjoining property owners are all different in terms of the types, the frequency, and the timing of notifications. All are zoning applications requiring advance notice and action by the Board. Therefore a consistent and uniform method of public notification is recommended. The public notification requirements for zoning ordinance amendment applications are the only notification requirements expressly set forth in the state general statutes. Those requirements are (1) newspaper advertisement once a week for two consecutive weeks with the first advertisement occurring not less than 10 days or more than 25 days prior to the hearing date, and (2) first class notice mailed to property owners and adjoining property owners at least 10 but no more than 25 days in advance of the hearing date. It is recommended that this public notification standard be the notification standard for all zoning applications for public hearings conducted by the Board.”

It was Board consensus to formally consider each of the six (6) listed zoning ordinance amendments from the Zoning Ordinance Review Committee as presented and to see each go through the appropriate process.

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler - Martin Starnes audit letter

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler asked about the Martin Starnes audit letter contained in the Board packages.

Finance Officer Kim Kenny explained that the letter provides an opportunity to respond but Board members are not required to respond.

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler - South Nags Head recycling trailer

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler asked staff to find a permanent location for the South Nags Head recycling trailer; she does not see a need for the issue to return to the Board.

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler - Jockey's Ridge presentation

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler confirmed with Comr. Oakes that a meeting will take place at Jockey’s Ridge State Park tomorrow, June 22, 2006 concerning low impact development.

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler - South Nags Head ditch

The ongoing issue of the cleaning of the South Nags Head ditch was discussed. Mayor Pro Tem Sadler asked if Town Manager Seth Lawless would meet with NC DOT to determine who is responsible for regular maintenance of the ditch and who is responsible if another Hurricane Isabel strikes the area.

Town Manager Lawless explained that NC DOT has stated that they will do spot maintenance but that there are not enough funds for anything more; as long as the ditch is functioning, they will not do anything to clean out the ditch.

Deputy Public Works Director Ralph Barile stated that the Corps of Engineers (COE) has laid claim to the ditch as a navigable waterway; Comr. Oakes requested that this claim be provided in writing.

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler - Evacuation re-entry guidelines

Mayor Pro Tem Sadler requested that Public Safety Director Charlie Cameron review the evacuation guidelines/classifications for information purposes for the public at an upcoming Board meeting. Chief Cameron stated that he would be happy to provide this information.

Comr. Oakes - South Nags Head recycling trailer

Comr. Oakes suggested that staff look at Huron Street, located just south of the Bodie Island Beach Club, as a possible permanent location for the South Nags Head recycling trailer.

Comr. Oakes - Trash in the Town

Comr. Oakes stated that he has seen an increase in trash in the Town.

Deputy Public Works Director Ralph Barile reported that the sanitation worker that picks up trash/rolls back the automated carts has been gone due to injury and due to participation in the Reserves and just recently returned. In addition, Mr. Barile noted the increase in garbage with the increase in visitors to the area.

Comr. Oakes pointed out that it makes a difference in the appearance of the Town when this work is not being done. Chief Cameron pointed out that he has been in touch with the Detention Center concerning the use of the inmates.

ADJOURNMENT

MOTION: Comr. Remaley made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sadler which passed unanimously. The time was 9:28 p.m.

_______________________________

Carolyn F. Morris, Town Clerk

Approved: July 5, 2006_______________

Mayor: ___________________________

M. Renée Cahoon

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download