PHIL 220



PHIL 220 Fall 2012

Study Guide/Exam 1

I You should be able to identify or define the following terms:

Moral Theory

Right

Good

Tripartite Deontic Schema

Intrinsic Value

Extrinsic Value

Tripartite Axiological Schema

Theoretical Aim

Practical Aim

Moral Principle

Standard of Explanatory Power

Standard of Practical Guidance

Divine Command Theory

Ethical Relativism

Categorical

Humanity Formulation

Universal Law Formulation

Voluntary Informed Consent

Occurent Coercion

Dispositional Coercion

Consequentialism

Utilitarianism

Perfectionist Utilitarianism

Rule Consequentialism

Utility

Principle of Utility

Value Perfectionism

The Relationship View

The Public View

Right

Rights Based Moral Theories

Negative Right

Positive Right

II You should be able to answer multiple choice, true/false or matching questions about the following topics:

The Role of Reasons

Three Tasks a Moral Theory Must Accomplish

The Two Main Aims of Moral Theory

Evaluating Ethical Theories

Divine Command Theory

Ethical Relativism

Aquinas on Intrinsic Value

Basic Principle of Natural Law Theory

The Doctrine of Double Effect

Corvino’s Defense of Homosexuality

The different senses of Unnatural

The Formulations of the Categorical Imperative

Deception and Sexual Morality

Coercion and Sexual Morality

Implications (of the claims of Consequentialism)

The Theory of Value of the various types of consequentialism

The Theory of Right Conduct of the various types of consequentialism

The Argument Strategy

Possible Consequences

Real Consequences?

Another Rule

Rights Based Theories

Criticisms of Rights Theories

What’s Being Assumed

Is Porn the Problem

Berlin on Negative and Positive Liberty

Another Harm?

Too Quick?

III You should be able to write a 2-3 paragraph essay in response to one of the following questions.

Summarize the Catholic Church’s position on sexual morality as an example of a Natural Law Thoery approach to the question. Argue for or against the Church’s position on some or all of the normative conclusions about sexual behavior, focusing on the intrinsic goods identified by the theory.

In his essay “Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex ,“ John Corvino defends homosexuality from the charge that it is “unnatural” and that it poses a risk of special harm. Detail his arguments in defense of homosexuality in as much detail as possible before criticizing them or defending them from possible criticism.

Summarize as completely as possible Mappes’ advocacy of the liberal view of sexual morality in terms of his rejection of the use of deception and coercion in sexual interaction. Argue for or against the liberal view on sexual morality using Mappes’ position as a reference point.

Criticize or defend Gallagher’s arguments against what she calls the relationship view of marriage and in favor of the public view. As part of your discussion argue in faovr of or opposition to same-sex marriage.

Argue for or against the censorship of pornography on either consequentialists or Rights-Based Theory grounds. As part of your argument, make sure to discuss either Strossen’s or Dworkin’s arguments.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download