THE 76-MM GUN M1A1 AND M1A2: AN ANALYSIS OF U.S. ANTI-TANK ...
嚜燃NCLASSIFIED
AD
AD-E403 980
Technical Report ARMET-TR-17002
THE 76-MM GUN M1A1 AND M1A2: AN ANALYSIS OF U.S. ANTI-TANK
CAPABILITIES DURING WORLD WAR II
Jose Cosme
Jeff Ranu
Shawn Spickert-Fulton
January 2018
U.S. ARMY ARMAMENT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND
ENGINEERING CENTER
Munitions Engineering Technology Center
Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the
author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army
position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation.
The citation in this report of the names of commercial firms or commercially
available products or services does not constitute official endorsement by or
approval of the U.S. Government.
Destroy by any means possible to prevent disclosure of contents or
reconstruction of the document. Do not return to the originator.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Form Approved
OMB No. 0704-01-0188
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection
of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188),
1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY)
3. DATES COVERED (From 每 To)
2. REPORT TYPE
January 2018
Final
1939 to 1945
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
THE 76-MM GUN M1A1 AND M1A2: AN ANALYSIS OF U.S.
ANTI-TANK CAPABILITIES DURING WORLD WAR II
5b. GRANT NUMBER
6. AUTHORS
5d. PROJECT NUMBER
Jose Cosme, Jeff Ranu, and Shawn Spickert-Fulton
5e. TASK NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
REPORT NUMBER
U.S. Army ARDEC, METC
Munitions Systems Directorate
(RDAR-MEM-M)
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
10. SPONSOR/MONITOR*S ACRONYM(S)
U.S. Army ARDEC, ESIC
Knowledge & Process Management (RDAR-EIK)
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000
11. SPONSOR/MONITOR*S REPORT
NUMBER(S)
Technical Report ARMET-TR-17002
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
14. ABSTRACT
This report provides an analysis of the U.S. anti-tank technology during World War II. A ballistic analysis is
used to corroborate the battlefield history and gain an understanding of the physical and technological factors
that spurred the development of the M1 series 76-mm Gun and family of ammunition.
The technical manual (TM) 9-1907 was published 23 September 1944, but it was missing performance data
for the 76-mm hyper-velocity, armor-piercing (HVAP) shell and any information for performance of the U.S.
anti-tank capabilities against the German Panther tank. Battle history indicates there was a technological
capability gap against upgraded Panzer armor. This report attempts to use hand calculations and modeling and
simulation (PRODAS) to fill in the information that is missing in TM 9-1907. The analysis offers the reader a
greater engineering comprehension of the challenges faced between June 1944 and May 1945 and the
circumstances necessitating the rapid fielding of the 76-mm HVAP shell after German capability upgrades were
encountered in the European Theater of Operations from Normandy to the Battle of the Bulge (June to
December 1944).
15. SUBJECT TERMS
Ballistic performance analysis
Historic tank ammunition of World War II
Lambert-Zukas
Thompson
PRODAS
76-mm gun
M62A1 76-mm armor piercing capped (APC)
M93 76-mm hyper-velocity, armor-piercing tracer (HVAP-T)
TM 9-1907
Tank Destroyer
Armor penetration
Panzer IV
Panther
M4A3E8 Sherman tank
M4A3 (76) Sherman tank
M4A1 (76) Sherman tank
M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer
Limit velocity
V50
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF:
a. REPORT
b. ABSTRACT
c. THIS PAGE
U
U
U
17. LIMITATION OF
ABSTRACT
18. NUMBER
OF
PAGES
SAR
55
19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON
Jeff Ranu
19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area
(973) 724-2733
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98)
code)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CONTENTS
Page
Introduction
1
Early World War II Anti-tank Efforts
1
U.S. Anti-tank Options circa 1940 versus the German Threat
2
The 76-mm Gun M1A1 and M1A2
3
Performance Assessment at Aberdeen Proving Ground
5
Ammunition Issued for 76-mm in 1943
6
Initial Fielding 每 Anzio
7
The Panther Problem 每 Tank Troubles in France
7
Finding a Solution with Sub-caliber Penetrators
8
Hyper-velocity Armor-piercing Tracer 76-mm M93
9
What Happened in Normandy?
10
Ballistics Modeling and Calculations
13
Velocity Degradation versus Range
Determination of Velocity versus Range using PRODAS
Limit Velocity Calculation
Armor Penetration Performance
13
14
17
18
Limit Velocity Calculations for 76-mm M62A1 Armor Piercing Capped versus Panther
Limit Velocity Calculations for 76-mm M62A1 Armor Piercing Capped versus Panzer IV
Limit Velocity Calculations for 76-mm M93 Hyper-velocity, Armor-piercing Tracer
Effective Range Determination
18
20
21
21
Comparing Effective Ranges 每 PRODAS and Ballistic Analysis Laboratory Technical
Report No. 66
25
Fighting Back 每 M1A2 76-mm September 1944 to January 1945
28
Conclusions
30
References
33
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
UNCLASSIFIED
i
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- test taking advice and tips student for all tests sample
- cycloids and paths portland state university
- sat subject tests percentile ranks college board
- parent guide to leap 2025 tests
- graphite properties and characteristics entegris
- a comparative study of history interests between american
- 2020 21 florida statewide end of course assessments fact sheet
- sta 2023 practice questions chapter 1 to sec 6
- solution to stat 350 exam 2 review questions spring 2015
- frye v united states no 3968 court of appeals of