O T E V I E T N AM W F U N I A R A M United States Allies in the E R H ...
50
th
United States Allies in the
ME
O
N
THE UN
IT
V
RICA
CO
M
E
AM
R
STATE S O
ED TNAM W F
A
E
I
MORA
I
T
Introduction (Part 1 of 5)
American Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, and Airmen fought side by side with their counterparts
from five allied nations in defense of the Republic of (South) Vietnam. The American people
thank, honor, and commend the fighting forces of our allies in the Vietnam War for their
service and sacrifice.
For the United States and its allies, the Vietnam War was a multinational
effort to stem the tide of communist expansion¡ªsupported by America¡¯s
Cold War rivals, the Soviet Union and China¡ªin Southeast Asia. South
Vietnam was a hot spot in a larger Cold War context. As in all conflicts,
a complex web of motivating forces animated the combatants. Lofty ideals
such as friendship, allegiance, and freedom spurred some to engage.
Money, recognition, shared interests, and geo-political advantage played
important roles in inciting action as well.
did not. For many people in these nations, Communist revolutionaries
represented a grave national threat. From their perspective, the war in
Vietnam successfully halted that threat. To one degree or another, leaders
in these countries acknowledge that the multi-decade American presence
in Southeast Asia¡ªand the Vietnam War in particular¡ªwas a positive
factor in the prevention of communist domination in the region.
More Flags
On April 23, 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson for the first time publicly
stated, ¡°I would hope that we would see some other flags in [South
Vietnam] ¡ and that we could all unite in an attempt to stop the spread of
communism in that area of the world, and the attempt to destroy freedom.¡±
His appeal became the basis of the American ¡°More Flags¡± campaign, an
endeavor to encourage wider international participation in the security
of South Vietnam. The United States used the term ¡°Free World¡± in its
efforts to garner participation especially by Western Bloc and other noncommunist countries. Bilateral diplomacy was also brought to bear.
Free World Allies
An American and Korean officer inspect a unit of Korean, American,
Australian, and Vietnamese military policemen in Saigon. (National Archives)
Many nations provided assistance, both military and humanitarian, to
the South Vietnamese people from the mid-1950s to the mid-1970s. A
total of six nations sent combat troops to fight in South Vietnam against
North Vietnam and the southern-based Viet Cong insurgency in the
1960s and 1970s. These nations were the United States, Australia, New
Zealand, Republic of (South) Korea, Thailand, and the Philippines.
The contributions of the Free World combat allies in Vietnam were
significant, both from political and military standpoints. Historians
and commentators differ in interpreting the motivations not only of the
participating governments, but also of the individual participants. The
South Koreans, Thais, and Filipinos received considerable American
financial support to facilitate their military participation in South
Vietnam. The Australians and New Zealanders, by contrast, served
in Vietnam at their own expense. Negative or ambivalent political
impressions notwithstanding, there was a general consensus among
American military leadership at that time that the Free World allies fought
well. Taken as a whole, the combat effectiveness of the Free World forces
relieved significant pressure on American troops, and played a critical role
in pacifying and securing their assigned areas of operation. Perhaps even
more importantly from the American psychological perspective, every
allied soldier, sailor, marine, or airman who served in Vietnam meant
one less American Soldier, Sailor, Marine, or Airman who had to deploy.
For that simple (if imperfect) calculus alone, Americans were grateful.
In 1965, when the U.S. military moved massively into South Vietnam,
Thailand, Malaysia, and the Philippines faced internal threats from
armed communist insurgencies, and the communist underground
was still active in Singapore. . . . America¡¯s action ¡ enabled noncommunist Southeast Asia to put their own houses in order. By 1975,
they were in better shape to stand up to the communists. Had there
been no U.S. intervention, the will of these countries to resist them
would have melted and Southeast Asia would most likely have gone
communist. The prosperous emerging market economies of ASEAN
[the Association of South East Asian Nations] were nurtured during
the Vietnam War years.
¡ª Lee Kuan Yew, Prime Minister of Singapore
U.S. citizens and their allies continue to wrestle with the Vietnam
War¡¯s legacies. While western nations mostly regard the war¡¯s outcome
as a defeat of the United States and its allies, that is not the consensus
everywhere. Thailand, for example, celebrates ¡°the American War¡± as an
unmitigated victory, and it is a viewpoint shared by others in Southeast
Asia. While Laos, Cambodia, and South Vietnam came under Communist
regimes, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand
The inauguration ceremony marking the formal opening of the
International Military Assistance Office building (IMAO) of the Republic
of Vietnam. The Color Guards represent South Vietnam, the United
States, the Republic of China (Taiwan), Australia, the Philippines, the
Republic of Korea (South Korea), New Zealand, and Thailand. Cholon,
Vietnam, April 8, 1965 (National Archives)
By the Numbers
A quick glance at the numbers provides an indication of the service and
sacrifice of the Free World allies. The New Zealanders had the highest
ratio of fatal casualties to participants at 2.18 percent, with the Americans
a very close second at 2.15 percent. The South Koreans were next at 1.4
percent, and both the Thais and Australians were under 1 percent. Nine
Filipinos were killed in the conflict. Of the allies, the Australians served
in Vietnam for the longest period of time, but they deployed relatively
few military personnel before 1965, and, as with the Americans, they
were advisers rather than combatants before then. The first South
Korean combat troops arrived shortly after the Americans escalated their
involvement by deploying combat troops in 1965.
Allied Nation
Timeframe
Total Number of
Military Participants
Total Number
Killed
United States of America
1962¨C1973
2,709,918
58,318
Republic of Korea
1965¨C1973
320,000+
4,407
Australia
1962¨C1972
61,000+
500
Thailand
1965¨C1972
40,000+
351
New Zealand
1964¨C1972
3,800+
83
Philippines
1966-1969
10,000
9
Allied Strength in Vietnam, 1964¨C1972
Year
The Free World Military Assistance Forces Headquarters building in
Saigon. An Australian Land Rover 1/4 ton truck and three Volkswagen
Kombi Vans (with red kangaroos) are parked in the car park.
(U.S. Department of the Army)
Australia
South Korea
New Zealand
Philippines
Thailand
1964
200
200
30
20
__
1965
1,560
20,620
120
70
20
1966
4,530
25,570
160
2,060
240
1967
6,820
47,830
530
2,020
2,220
1968
7,660
50,000
520
1,580
6,000
1969
7,670
48,870
550
190
11,570
1970
6,800
48,540
440
70
11,570
1971
2,000
45,700
100
50
6,000
1972
130
36,790
50
50
40
Source: The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War: A Political, Social, and Military History, edited by Spencer C. Tucker
A GRATEFUL NATION THANKS AND HONORS OUR VIETNAM WAR VETERANS
50
th
United States Allies in the
ME
O
N
THE UN
IT
V
RICA
CO
M
E
AM
R
STATE S O
ED TNAM W F
A
E
I
MORA
I
T
The Republic of (South) Korea (Part 2 of 5)
Korean Tiger Division instructor supervises Vietnamese students on the rifle
range, August 1968. (National Archives)
This is a famous picture in South Korea. The words ??? ??????
written across the center mean: ¡°Do not aim at this area.¡± Above that is a girl¡¯s
name and an expression of loving sentiments.
The Vietnam War was South Korea¡¯s first major military engagement since the
signing of the Korean War armistice in 1953. All Korean troops in Vietnam were
volunteers. The United States thanks and honors the Korean veterans who served
in Vietnam.
South Korean military participation in the Vietnam War began in the
autumn of 1965 and did not end until the last American combat troops
departed. The first Republic of Korea soldiers and marines (commonly
referred to by American forces as ROKs, pronounced ¡°rocks¡±) began
arriving several months after the first American combat troops arrived.
Military observers asserted that the ROKs fought bravely; many said
fiercely. Their tactics and techniques have often drawn criticism from
some commenters as being unnecessarily brutal, but their bravery and
discipline were not questioned, even by their enemies.
A squad leader keeps in touch with other elements as 1st Battalion, Cavalry
Regiment, ROK Tiger Division move through dense Central Highlands near
Binh Khe in search of enemy, September 1969. (National Archives)
The success and contributions of Korean forces in Vietnam are to some
degree unsung and underappreciated outside of military circles. Indeed,
for many Americans who served with them, their fighting abilities were
the stuff of legend. Korean troops recorded a high casualty ratio against
Communist forces and captured a large number of prisoners and vast
stores of weapons and war materiel. In so doing, they denied sanctuary
to the communist insurgency and disrupted Viet Cong activity in their
assigned areas of operation.
ROK code of conduct in the Vietnam War:
To the enemy, be courageous and fearless.
To the Vietnamese people, behave with kindness and warmness.
To our allies, show them we are well disciplined and reliable.
Perhaps most importantly from the United States¡¯ perspective,
contemporaries believed Korean troops were as effective as their American
counterparts in combat, which took the burden off U.S. troops in the
Koreans¡¯ area of operations. The United States subsidized Korean forces¡¯
participation, and in some ways the Vietnam War proved an economic
boon for the fledgling nation.
From 1965 to 1973, more than 300,000 ROK soldiers and marines served in
South Vietnam. That number is second only to U.S. and South Vietnamese
service members, and more than all the rest of the allies combined. Nearly
5,000 Koreans sacrificed their lives in the war.
ROK Areas of Operation
In March 1965, a CIA report described South Vietnam¡¯s principal
problem thus: ¡°The Viet Cong are continuing to make significant gains
¡ particularly along the low coastal regions. ¡ The [South Vietnamese]
government is clearly on the defensive ¡. Pacification remains stalled
and further deterioration of rural security is expected.¡±
The response to the CIA¡¯s assessment arrived in the form of the ROK Army
Capital ¡°Tiger¡± Division and the ROK 2nd Marine ¡°Blue Dragon¡± Brigade.
These Korean units were primarily responsible for the pacification and
documents that ordered NVA [North Vietnamese Army] units to avoid
contact with ROKs at all cost, unless 100 percent certain of victory.¡± While
most of the apocryphal stories about which units the North Vietnamese
truly feared inevitably included the teller¡¯s own, nearly every version of
the tale included Korean troops.
Korean troops use chart to show villagers types of Viet Cong booby traps.
(National Archives)
security of the coastal provinces of Binh Dinh, Phu Yen, Khanh Hoa and
Ninh Thuan in II Corps. They undertook the task with vigor. The coastal
areas, especially south of Qui Nhon down to Phan Rang, remained
relatively secure from then onward under the watchful eye of the ROKs.
In September 1966, South Korea sent a second army division, the 9th ¡°White
Horse¡± Division, to take over operations in the southern part of II Corp¡¯s
coastal region. This freed up the ROK marines to move north to assist the
U.S. Marines in Quang Nam province, in I Corps, a dangerous and volatile
region aptly nicknamed ¡°Marine Country¡± by American servicemen.
An analysis of a combat action by Korean Capital Division forces from
January 1968 clearly illustrates the Korean technique. After contact
with an enemy force near Phu Cat, the Koreans ¡°reacting swiftly . . .
deployed six companies in an encircling maneuver and trapped the
enemy force in their cordon. The Korean troops gradually tightened
the circle, fighting the enemy during the day and maintaining their
tight cordon at night, thus preventing the enemy¡¯s escape. At the
conclusion of the sixth day of fighting, 278 NVA had been KIA with
the loss of just 11 Koreans, a kill ratio of 25.3 to 1.
An official U.S. Army study perhaps summed up the general feeling best:
¡°Considered opinion was that it was good the Koreans were ¡®friendlies.¡¯¡±
The Koreans were thorough in their planning and deliberate in their
execution of a plan. They usually surrounded an area by stealth
and quick movement¡ The enemy feared the Koreans both for their
tactical innovations and for the soldiers¡¯ tenacity... The Koreans
might not suffer many casualties, might not get too many of the enemy
on an operation, but when they brought in seventy-five or a hundred
weapons, the Americans wondered where in the world they got them.
They appeared to have a natural nose for picking up enemy weapons
that were, as far as the enemy thought, securely cached away.
(Vietnam Studies: Allied Participation in Vietnam, by Lieutenant
General Stanley Robert Larsen & Brigadier General James Lawton
Collins, Jr., U.S. Department of the Army)
(Vietnam Studies: Allied Participation in Vietnam, by Lieutenant
General Stanley Robert Larsen & Brigadier General James Lawton
Collins, Jr., U.S. Department of the Army)
American military observers recorded that the ROK forces served with
distinction and valor in Vietnam. Korean troops attained an almost
mythic status among friends and foes alike, and some contemporaries
also accused South Korean troops of using overly aggressive, even brutal
tactics. Tales and legends abounded among U.S. service people of the
ROKs¡¯ strict discipline, toughness, and military prowess. They were said
to be especially efficient and effective in counterinsurgency warfare, small
unit tactics and operations, and hand-to-hand combat.
One legend oft-related by American servicemen was particularly revealing.
A typical version went something like this: ¡°I¡¯ve seen captured enemy
Vietnamese students practice the art of Tae Kwon Do under the supervision
of their Korean instructors, August 1968. (National Archives)
A GRATEFUL NATION THANKS AND HONORS OUR VIETNAM WAR VETERANS
50
th
United States Allies in the
ME
O
N
THE UN
IT
V
RICA
CO
M
E
AM
R
STATE S O
ED TNAM W F
A
E
I
MORA
I
T
Thailand (Part 3 of 5)
Thirdly, Thailand¡¯s location was strategically optimal for air operations
in both North and South Vietnam (and also over Laos and Cambodia).
The U.S. Air Force began flying missions from bases in Thailand in
1961, and by the end of the war in 1975 it was operating out of all seven
Royal Thai Air Force bases (Udorn, Ubon, Korat, Takhli, Nhakhon
Phanom, U-Tapao, and Don Muang at Bangkok). The U.S. spent $250
million on construction at these bases, part of the $2 billion overall
that was pumped into the Thai economy over the course of the war.
Thai Queen¡¯s Cobras on a search and sweep mission near the village of Phuoc Tho,
November 1967. (National Archives)
Queen¡¯s Cobra arrival in the Republic of Vietnam, unloading from U.S.
Navy Troop Ship Navarro, September 1967. (National Archives)
Queen¡¯s Cobra during a search and sweep mission in Phuoc Tho, November
1967. (National Archives)
Thailand was a staunch supporter of United States involvement in Vietnam from the outset. Thailand
maintained that it sided with South Vietnam and the United States out of a desire to help the South
Vietnamese and to halt the rise of communism in the region. Some have also pointed to the economic benefits
they received from the U.S. for supporting the Saigon government as another motivating factor. Regardless,
almost all agree that Thai participation benefited President Johnson¡¯s Free World alliance. The United States
owes the Thai veterans of the Vietnam War a debt of gratitude.
From the American government¡¯s point of view, it was critical for
American public support of the war that Thailand accepted shared
responsibility for the defense of Southeast Asia. President Johnson¡¯s
1964 appeal to Thai Prime Minister Kittikachorn Thanom is telling:
By October 1967, the first Thai combat troops had arrived in Vietnam
to fight alongside the Australians, New Zealanders, and U.S. Soldiers
stationed at Camp Bearcat, near Bien Hoa, in II Corps. They were
the Royal Thai Volunteer Regiment (a.k.a. the Queen¡¯s Cobras). In
1968, the Queen¡¯s Cobras were replaced by the Royal Thai Army
Expeditionary Division (a.k.a. the Black Panthers).
Most observers reported that Thai soldiers fought bravely and well
in Vietnam. They were generally well-liked by American service
people, who apocryphally regarded them as the ¡°luckiest¡± soldiers
in Vietnam. Many Thai troops attributed this legendary luck to the
protective powers of their Buddhist amulets, which they professed to
believe rendered them bulletproof. Some Americans claimed to share
that belief, and were grateful that the Thais were quite willing to share
the talismans of their good fortune.
A controversy surrounding Thai soldiers erupted in the United States
when the international press took note of their delight in American
material goods and their rumored association with the Saigon black
market. That coupled with the revelation that the U.S. was subsidizing
their involvement in the war led some antiwar activists to argue that
Thai troops were mercenaries.
The Thai government did receive more U.S. foreign aid during the
Vietnam War than any other country in Southeast Asia save South
Vietnam. Like South Vietnamese troops, Thai soldiers were trained
and equipped by the United States, transported in U.S. ships and
planes, and funded by American taxpayers.
Nonetheless, Thailand shouldered a significant burden in the wars
in Southeast Asia, both in Vietnam and in Laos, where the United
States was embroiled in a covert war against the Communist Pathet
Lao insurgency. Though Laos did fall to a communist regime, the
Thai strategy of containing the threat outside their own borders
succeeded. Thai counterinsurgency skill and expertise helped stanch
the spread of communism into their own country, which in turn
furthered the U.S. goal of maintaining stable non-communist nations
in Southeast Asia.
I am very much aware of and deeply appreciative of steady support
you and your Government are providing. ... It is, nevertheless,
my hope that Thailand will find ways of increasing the scale and
scope of its assistance to Vietnam, as a renewed demonstration of
Free World determination to work together to repel Communist
aggression.
Between September 1967 and February 1972, nearly 40,000 Thai
military personnel served in South Vietnam. Of those, 351 were
killed and 1,358 were wounded. The United States remained grateful
for their service and sacrifice.
Several distinguishing factors made Thailand an excellent U.S. ally in
the region.
Firstly, the Thai government keenly believed that communism posed
a danger not only to their own nation but also to all of Southeast
Asia. They were determined to stifle this threat before it could destroy
them, which dovetailed nicely with American goals in the region.
Secondly, unlike most of Thailand¡¯s neighbors, colonialism had not
left a mark on the collective psyche of the Thai people. Thailand had
never been ruled by a colonial power, and while they had experienced
pressure from the British in Burma to the west, and the French
in Indochina to the east, they had never given up their national
sovereignty. As a result, most Thais harbored notably less antipathy
toward and distrust of Europeans and Americans than did their fellow
Southeast Asians.
Thailand is situated near Vietnam and it will be the next target of
communists, as they have already proclaimed. This is why Thailand
realizes the necessity to send Military units to help oppose communist
aggression when it is still at a distance from our country. The
government has therefore decided to send a combat unit, one battalion
strong, to take an active part in the fighting in South Vietnam in the
near future.
¡ª Statement by the Thai government, January 3, 1967.
Thai lieutenant, wearing an assortment of Buddhist amulets, maps out
the route the platoon will take for the day¡¯s operations near Nhon Trac,
October 1967. (National Archives)
A GRATEFUL NATION THANKS AND HONORS OUR VIETNAM WAR VETERANS
RICA
50
N
th
ME
O
CO
M
United States Allies in the
E
AM
R
THE UN
IT
V
STATE S O
ED TNAM W F
A
E
I
MORA
I
T
ANZAC (Part 4 of 5)
Three Royal Australian Air Force Caribou aircraft arrive at Tan Son Nhut
Air Base with crew and maintenance personnel to aid in the airlift support
mission in South Vietnam, August 1965. (National Archives)
Members of the 1st Field Squadron of the Royal Australian Engineers use
American mine detectors to search for mines on a small dirt road, August 1970.
(National Archives)
The Australian army¡¯s only serving Victoria Cross recipients stand together in
Saigon, May 1969. (Courtesy: Australian War Memorial)
The coalition of Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) were valuable allies in the fight to
prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia. While both countries faced growing antiwar sentiment
at home, neither wavered in their commitment to the United States and to South Vietnam throughout the
war. Most American soldiers who had contact with these service people from ¡°down under¡± were impressed
by their military professionalism and charmed by their bearing. The United States is grateful to the
Australian and New Zealand veterans of the Vietnam War.
ANZUS
In 1951, Australia, New Zealand and United States signed a Security Treaty
(ANZUS), which was a trilateral agreement designed to protect the nations¡¯
mutual interests in the Pacific. Though the treaty was not formally invoked
for the Vietnam War effort, Australia and New Zealand nevertheless sent
forces¡ªat their own expense¡ªto support the United States in defending
South Vietnam.
Members of Royal New Zealand Artillery carry out a fire mission.
(National Archives)
Australia
By 1961, the Australian government believed
that defeating communism in South
Vietnam was a matter both of principle and
of self-defense, given the assumption that a
communist-dominated Southeast Asia, just to
Australia¡¯s north, represented a threat. By the
end of the summer of 1962 they had sent a team
of 30 advisers, the Australian Army Training
Team Vietnam (AATTV), to assist in training
the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN).
Two years later, the team more than doubled in
size to 80 advisers embedded with ARVN field
forces and six Royal Australian Air Force DHC-4 Caribou transport planes
(with pilots).They also suffered their first fatal casualty.
When the United States escalated its support for the South Vietnamese by
sending combat troops in 1965, the Australians immediately followed suit.
They committed the 1st Battalion Royal Australian Regiment (1RAR), plus
support forces to serve under operational control of the US Army¡¯s 173rd
Airborne Brigade at Bien Hoa. By the end of 1965, 1RAR had expanded to
include an artillery battery, an engineer unit, an army aviation reconnaissance
flight, and logistic support elements.
The takeover of South Vietnam would be a direct military threat to
Australia and all the countries of South and South-East Asia. It must
be seen as part of a thrust by Communist China between the Indian
and Pacific Oceans.
¡ª Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, Hansard, 29 April 1965
armored personnel carriers with .50-caliber machine guns. In the end, the
North Vietnamese and Viet Cong broke off contact. The Aussies lost 18 killed
and 24 wounded, while enemy casualties were officially estimated at some 245
dead and 350 wounded.
Between 1962 and 1973, nearly 60,000 Australian Army, Air Force and Navy
personnel served in South Vietnam. At their peak, there were more than 8,300
Australians in-country at a time. More than 3,000 were wounded and 521 were
killed during the course of the war.
New Zealand
On August 18, 1966, Delta Company, 6th Battalion, Royal Australian
Regiment¡ªtotaling about 108 men¡ªset out to search and clear enemy forces
from Binh Ba, an old French rubber plantation not far from Saigon. They were
met by a combined Communist force of more than 1,500 North Vietnamese
and Viet Cong troops.
In the first serious exchange of gunfire, face to face with the enemy, the
Australians suffered most of the casualties they would suffer all day. Following
their initial encounter, once Delta Company had set up a defensive perimeter,
the Australian troops fought off multiple waves of attacks over the next four
hours in a heavy rainstorm. They were supported by artillery fire, resupplied
by two Royal Australian Air Force UH-1 ¡°Huey¡± Iroquois helicopter crews,
and reinforced by another Australian company that arrived at nightfall in
The 161st Battery of the Royal New Zealand Artillery arrived at Bien Hoa in
July 1965, initially to serve with the Aussies under command of the U.S. Army¡¯s
173rd Airborne Brigade. They later moved with the Australian task force to
Nui Dat, where they served with Royal Australian Artillery field regiments
until May 1971.
In 1967, New Zealand further committed two rifle companies from the 1st
Battalion of the Royal New Zealand Infantry Regiment, who fought side-byside with the Australians in the 1ATF.
The nation also provided several New Zealand Royal Air Force UH-1 Iroquois
helicopter pilots and, in 1969, sent a small troop of the New Zealand Special
Air Service who were also attached to their Australian counterparts.
Between 1964 and 1972, about 3,500 New Zealand military personnel served
in South Vietnam, though no more than 550 were in-country at any given
time. They suffered 187 wounded and 37 dead during that timeframe.
Though the Americans and Australians cooperated and fought well together,
the Australian command structure did not wholeheartedly endorse American
tactics, or American rules of engagement, which they sometimes perceived to
be unnecessarily restrictive and counterproductive. They wanted to fight their
own way. So when, in 1966, the Australian government increased its troop
commitment to a task force of two battalions with combat logistic support,
the 1st Australian Task Force (1ATF), they took the opportunity to separate
from the 173rd Airborne and become an independent command with its own
area of operations in Phuoc Tuy Province, based at Nui Dat. The 1st Australian
Logistic Support group (1ALSG) was established nearby at the port and airfield
facility of Vung Tau.
The Australian ¡°diggers¡± (a term widely used to describe ANZAC troops since
the Gallipoli landings in World War I) were effective and capable soldiers. The
Battle of Long Tan illustrates this point.
Like Australia, New Zealand¡¯s government was a reliable ally in the war in
Southeast Asia. As early as 1963, they provided concrete support to the South
Vietnamese people by sending a civilian surgical team to provide medical
assistance in Qui Nhon. By the summer of 1964, they had sent 25 Army
engineers to assist with infrastructure reconstruction projects. In the summer
of 1965, they sent combat forces.
Platoon sergeant and radio operator of the 8th Platoon, C Company, 7th Royal
Australian Regiment during an ambush patrol in the Nui Thi Vai Hills, February 1968. (National Archives)
The [Australian] army took over a stretch of Back Beach at Vung
Tau, on the coast near Saigon, and during the war ran its own
fortified recreation centre complete with surfboards, sailing boats,
water skiing and go-karts, plus bars, a swimming pool, a concert
stage and mini-golf beside the beachfront clubhouse. The one nod of
recognition that a war was actually going on was there in the barbed
wire and machinegun emplacements. At the Peter Badcoe surf club,
named after an Australian Victoria Cross winner, the soldiers could
stow their weapons, have a hot shower, change into civilian clothes,
enjoy a meat pie and a beer.
¡ª Stuart Scott, Charlie Don¡¯t Surf, But Aussies Do
A GRATEFUL NATION THANKS AND HONORS OUR VIETNAM WAR VETERANS
RICA
50
N
th
ME
O
CO
M
United States Allies in the
E
AM
R
THE UN
IT
V
STATE S O
ED TNAM W F
A
E
I
MORA
I
T
Philippines (Part 5 of 5)
PHILCAG-V provided medical care to Vietnamese families throughout Tay
Ninh Province, September 1969. (National Archives)
PHILCAG-V brigadier general and Army of Republic of Vietnam Armored
Forces major general discuss the civic action program being conducted in the
hamlet of Ben Dinh, near Tay Ninh, September 1968. (National Archives)
The Philippines provided effective support to the United States and its allies in South Vietnam, initially
with the Philippines Contingent (PHILCON) and later the Philippines Civic Action Group-Vietnam
(PHILCAG-V). Most of the Filipinos who volunteered and were sent to serve in Vietnam did their duty with
honor and dignity. And they achieved excellent results. The United States thanks and honors the Filipino
veterans who served in Vietnam.
Note on civic action groups from an Australian observer:
¡°Results [of civil aid programs] were also forthcoming from the
military point of view. ... Villages receiving civic action stated that
these activities were one of the major factors in helping them decide
to return to the Government. One villager commented that projects
were being completed which the Viet Cong had promised years before
but had never carried out.¡±
¡ª Ian McNeill,
To Long Tan: The Australian Army and the Vietnam War 1950-1966
Operation Brotherhood
In 1954, after Vietnam had been divided into a communist North and
a non-communist South, thousands of northern Vietnamese fled south.
Oscar Arellano, president of the Manila chapter of the Philippines Junior
Chamber of Commerce (Jaycees) saw it as a humanitarian crisis and
enlisted the support of Philippine President Ramon Magsaysay, who
responded thus: ¡°We have been assisted in our hour of need by generous
friends. Shall we then deny our help to our neighbors when they are in
need of it? Human misery knows no national boundaries. By all means,
help them. And if there is anything that I and this government can
do to help, please feel free to come to me.¡± Over the next two years, in
what Filipinos designated Operation Brotherhood, the Jaycees, with the
cooperation of the Philippine government, sent 235 doctors, nurses,
social workers, dentists, and other workers, who treated some 730,000
patients in medical facilities throughout South Vietnam.
Instead, the Philippine house and senate approved an appropriation for
civic assistance. In August 1964, the Philippines sent a contingent of 16
doctors, nurses, technicians, and civic action officers from the Philippine
armed forces to assist ¡°in the advisory effort directed toward psychological
warfare and civil affairs in III Corps,¡± according to the U.S. Military
Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) Command History (1964). The
group was called PHILCON (the Philippines Contingent).
Philippines Civic Action Group-Vietnam
In 1966, the Vietnamese government
requested increased aid from the Philippines,
including combat troops. In response, the
Philippines sent a new detachment to
South Vietnam to replace PHILCON. The
Philippines Civic Action Group-Vietnam
(PHILCAG-V) included an engineer
construction battalion, medical and
rural community development teams,
a security battalion, and a logistics and
headquarters element. They set up base in
Tay Ninh, 45 miles northwest of Saigon, in
the summer of 1966. Over the next 40 months,
PHILCAG-V performed a variety of civic
action tasks, primarily in public works construction, rural development,
and food and medical relief.
Notably, Philippine senator Ferdinand Marcos had led the country¡¯s
refusal in 1964 to authorize combat troops to support the South
Vietnamese war effort. Once he became president, however, he changed
his position and agreed to provide a combat engineering battalion as part
of an increased aid package.
¡°Philuatan¡±
PHILCAG-V was an effective agent of humanitarian aid and civic action,
and was appreciated by the South Vietnamese. Several members of the
first PHILCAG-V remember that the South Vietnamese had a special
nickname for the Filipinos: ¡°Everywhere they went, they were called
¡®Philuatan.¡¯ It means: ¡®Filipinos are Number One.¡¯¡± Apparently, Filipinos
were remembered fondly by many Vietnamese people. Operation
Brotherhood had left its mark.
Air and Naval Bases
Perhaps the greatest contribution by the Philippine government to the
U.S. war effort in Vietnam was the willingness to allow U.S. forces to
continue operations out of Naval Base Subic Bay in Zambales and Clark
Air Base at Angeles City in Luzon, both in the Philippines.
Philippines Contingent
In 1964, in response to U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson¡¯s ¡°More Flags¡±
campaign, Philippines President Diosdado Macapagal sought funds
from the Philippine congress to send combat troops to South Vietnam.
PHILCAG-V sergeant treats a little girl for body sores while her mother holds
her during the civic action program in the hamlet of Ben Dinh, September 1968.
(National Archives)
Filipino medics fight to keep a U.S. Special Forces sergeant alive at a small
hospital in Vietnam in 1965. (Mike Mealey, Stars and Stripes)
While made up of 2,068 Filipino soldiers at its peak, PHILCAG-V
was a humanitarian mission, not a combat force. The PHILCAG-V
motto sums up the ethos: To build, not destroy; to bring happiness,
not sorrow; to develop good will, not hatred. Nevertheless, the Filipino
soldiers sacrificed 9 dead and 64 wounded during their time in South
Vietnam. PHILCAG-V was fully redeployed back to the Philippines by
December 1969.
Cutters of Coast Guard Squadron One (RONONE) depart for Vietnam after
being refitted for combat service at Subic Bay, Philippines, 1965. (USCG)
A GRATEFUL NATION THANKS AND HONORS OUR VIETNAM WAR VETERANS
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- u s military fatal casualties of the vietnam war for home state of
- vietnam casualty list all casualties
- vietnam war togetherweserved
- chapter 4 a new threat in northern i corps united states marine corps
- race casualties and opinion in the vietnam war
- the 1968 tet offensive battles
- the u s marine corps in the vietnam war
- american war and military operations casualties lists and statistics
- uscg in vietnam chronology u s department of defense
- vietnam war casualty statistics analysis army heritage center foundation
Related searches
- am i a type a personality
- united states mission to the united nations
- united states mission to the un
- united states population in 1970
- united states secretary of the interior
- united states department of the treasury irs
- united states department of the treasury organization
- united states secretary of the treasury
- allies in the ww1
- united states embassy in washington dc
- united states department of the treasury
- united states involvement in the vietnam war