The Village of Haverstraw New York | Located on the Hudson ...



The minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting held on Thursday, February 14, 2018, beginning at 7:30 PM.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL Edwin Rivera, Chairman           - Excused

Jose Guareño                           - Excused

Deyanira Martinez                - Present

Richard Santiago                      - Present

Jose Hilario                                - Present

Dennis Michaels, Village Atty.  - Present

Ruben Berrios, Bldg.Inspector - Present

Stephanie Serrano, Clerk Typist - Present

Deyanira Martinez introduced the first application of the night, Mosquea Construction, 7 Van Houten Street, Haverstraw, NY 10927- 27.54-2-36

Raymond Mosquea- Hello, I’m Raymond Mosquea, 84 Picariello Drive, Haverstraw, NY 10927.

Deyanira Martinez- Would you please state what it is you’d like to do?

Raymond Moquea- So, on 7 Van houten Street there is currently an empty lot. What we want to do is build a 2 family house for my sister, who’s the owner, and for my half sister who would also be living there.

Deyanira Martines- So it’s an emoty lot right now, right?

Raymond Mosquea- Yes. Unfortunately she had class today, so she couldn’t be here personally.

Deyanira Martinez- So it’s a 3 family that you want?

Raymond Mosquea- No, a 2 family

Deyanira Martinez- A 2 family, yes I’m sorry. Is it going to be 3 bedrooms on the first floor or the 2nd floor?

Raymond Mosquea- It’s 2 bedrooms for each floor and then the basement.

Ruben Berrios- I just need to point something out; on the plan that the architect submitted, she’s incorrect with some of these numbers. With the setbacks and everything else. There’s a section in the code that allows you to go to 7 ½ feet on the side yards for a single family dwelling. She’s applying this to a 2 family dwelling and you can’t do that. If you look here, on your survey, he has the right numbers. This is what you have to go by. But the information she has here is incorrect. She’s using parts of the code that you can’t apply to a 2 family. That section is just for vacant lots for a single family dwelling. Like I said, if you look on the survey, that’s correct. He’s got the right information.

Deyanira Martinez- This is an R2 Zone?

Ruben Berrios- It’s an R2 Zone, yes. He has 2,861 and she has 2,808. You’re required to have 10,000 sq. ft. for a 2 family dwelling, with the setbacks on the side 15 feet and in the front 30 & 30.

Jose Hilario- So she’s got 6, it’s supposed to be 30. And she’s got 6 on this side too.

Ruben Berrios- Yes but like I said, look at the survey because that’s all correct.

Deyanira Martinez- So what is it that he as right now?

Ruben Berrios- If you look at the table and look right across, it’ll tell you what’s required and what they have. Now also understand that this is an existing lot, so it is what it is. You’re ot going to conform to the lot width because it’s existing.

Jose Hilario- You’re going to have inside parking?

Raymond Mosquea- Inside parking? No, it’s outside. To on the sides.

Ruben Berrios- If you look at the survey as well, it says 7 ½ feet, but that’s with the overhang. From the bottom of the house to the property line, you have 10 feet. That’s why that’s a little different.

Deyanira Martinez- Ok, so that just has got to be fixed, right?

Ruben Berrios- No no, this is fine. What I’m saying is that when you look at the survey, he’s got 7 ½ feet, but that’s from the overhang.

Richard Santiago- Oh got it

Ruben Berrios- You know, like a high ranch, you have a little overhang ok? But, what they do have is 10 feet. Correct? So they have 10 & 10.

Deyanira Martinez- Ok, does the Board hav any questions for the applicant?

Richard Santiago- Well they would have to confrom with the 2 family requirements. For instance, the numbers that you’re talking about between the 1 family and the 2 family.

Ruben Berrios- Yes, that’s what I’m saying. The ones that she has on the plans, they’re not correct. She applied some stuff that you can’t apply to it. But if you look at the table on the survey, that’s correct. The first one, where it says required, that’s what’s presently required in our bulk regulations. If you look on the second line where it says provided, that’s what they have and that’s what they’re going to be seeking variances for.

Raymond Mosquea- She has to coordinate the blue prints with the survey?

Ruben Berrios- Yes, like I said, she’s applying things here that don’t apply. But it‘s here, so... He’s got the right numbers.

Deyanira Martinez- You don’t have any problems, Ruben, right? Anything that concerns you?

Ruben Berrios- I mean, it’s a big house for the lot. It’s kind of tight.

Richard Santiago- It is tight.

Dennis Michaels- Well this is just an informal review. I’m sure applicants appreciate feedback as early as possible in the process so that additional time and investment expenditures are not needlessly expended. If you have any serious concerns about aspects of any project, any thoughts or concerns or observations, I’m sure the applicants will appreciate your feedback. That goes for every informal application. They don’t want to come to the public hearing to find out that it’s not a good idea and wonder why they weren’t told a month ago.

Deyanira Martinez- How are the neighbors? Are they close to the lot? Pretty close or no?

Raymond Mosquea- On the left hand side there is a lot of space because there’s an empty parking lot, on the other side it’s pretty close to the property.

Deyanira Martinez- But then you have the parking, which is giving space.

Dennis Michaels- I usually don’t give my thoughts on something that is exclusively your role, as to whether or not the variances that are sought fit in or are harmonious with the character of the sorrounding lots. I don’t know the neighborhood, I don’t. I’m just raising this question; this is a proposed 2 family dwellign on a 2,800sq.ft. lot. The minimum that’s required is 10,000sq.ft., I don’t know if you picked that up, yet because it’s an informal and you didn’t go through the plans with a fine toothed comb. I don’t know what the neighborhood’s like. Is this common in the immediate neighborhood?

Jose Hilario- There are 2 family houses around there, but for the most part it’s 1 family.

Dennis Michaels- Something else, again you may not have the answers now, but if there are many, in the immediate vicinity, many substandard lots that are 2,800-3,200sq.ft. lots; if this should go forward and be approved, you should expect that you’re going to get other applications for 2 family homes on a 3,000sq.ft. lot.

Richard Santiago- I propose maybe visiting the lot.

Dennis Michaels- Well you definitely should. So here’s the question: do you want to schedule for a public hearing? Or maybe have the applicant, at the applicants consent, come back for a second informal when the other 2 members of the board are here, to give them some real substantive feedback. Because, correct me if I’m wrong, we’ve never seen a project of seeking this magnitude of variances before. Is that corect?

Ruben Berrios- That’s correct, pretty much

Jose Hilario- It’s just the size

Dennis Michaels- You know, the minimum required is 10,000sq. ft. and this is 2,800sq. ft. I don’t think you’ve ever seen anything like that.

Deyanira Martinez- Yes, it’s pretty large.

Dennis Michaels- Maybe for a single family, but for a 2 family… Now a 2 family is permitted in the zoning district, but it’s permitted as of right on a 10,000 sq.ft. lot. If they want to build it on something that’s less than 10,000sq.ft., they’re going to need a variance and they’d have to prove to you and establish that they’ve met criteria for area variances. So it’s not a given that they get these area variances, they have to convince you that they meet the standards of qualifying for area variances. You understand your role, so I just thought that maybe this would be a good time to have a conversation about it or maybe come back for a second informal when the other 2 members are here. Or at least one other member.

Raymond Mosquea- Does the layout of the house matter, inside? Or is it just based on the size of it?

Jose Hilario- Just the whole size

Raymond Mosquea- So 2 bedroom is too big?

Dennis Michaels- I don’t vote, but maybe the board would be more comfortable with a smaller 2 family house? Or the same size structure as a single family. Because you have 2 contributing concerns. One is the number of swelling units; you’re proposing 2. So that’s an intensification of what’s there now, it’s a use that is permitted in the zoning district so let’s make that clear. 2 family swellings are permitted in the zoning district, but this is a very very very small lot. So maybe this Board would be receptive to the same size building but for a single family, or if you want to stay with the 2 family, maybe a much smaller building. That’s up to the ZBA, though. My opinion doesn’t matter on this, I’m just saying legally speaking, there is the concern of precedent because there may be other similarly sized lots that are now single family that would eventually want the same thing.

Richard Santiago- I propose a site visit and probably another informal.

Dennis Michaels- Would you be ok coming back for another informal review? It’ll save you some expense and aggravation.

Deyanira Martinez- Yes and that way we can hear from the other members as well, to see what they propose.

Dennis Michaels- I would also look at the neighboring lots of course. And I don’t know if Ruben has this information, but maybe the assessor’s office information. They may know what the neighboring uses of the lots are; are they single family, are they 2 family already?

Ruben Berrios- I can get that information

Deyanira Martinez- Ok, so we’ll keep it as an informal for next month. We’re going to do it right, we don’t want to end up with a headache later on, for you or for us either.

Jose Hilario- Can we set up a date that we can go and see the lot?

Deyanira Martinez- So you want to go see it? We can do that.

Dennis Michaels- Yes, why don’t you set something up while you have the owner’s representatives here. I don’t think you need to go into the house.

Deyanira Martinez- Well it’s an empty lot.

Richard Santiago- Well we’re checking the lot and the surrounding area

Dennis Michaels- I think you signed a form already giving permission to the Zoning Board members to visit the property, but just giving you a heads up.

Jose Hilario- We want to go and see the lot

Deyanira Martinez- When is our next meeting?

Stephanie Serrano- March 14th

Deyanira Martinez- So do you want to go on the 14th? Is it too dark to go before the meeting?

Richard Santiago- I can’t make it the 13th

Deyanira Martinez- So let’s make it the 14th around…

Jose Hilario- It’s got to be early, it’ll be too dark

Richard Santiago- 5pm-5:30pm? Just for there to be enough daylight out there.

Jose Hilario- I’d say 6

Deyanira Martinez- I get off from work at 6 and I work in New Jersey, so I won’t be able to make it, but I can go another day and look at the property during the day.

Ruben Berrios- If you guys want to go individually, I can go with you and take you.

Deyanira Martinez- Yes, we can go individually.

Ruben Berrios- Because if you come after 5:30, it’s going to be dark

Deyanira Martinez- It’s going to be too dark to look in

Jose Hilario- Ok, so we’ll call you to set it up

Ruben Berrios- I’m here every day

Jose Hilario- We’ll go during the day

Deyanira Martinez- Ok, so we’ll do that and we can keep it as an informal for next month. Ok?

Raymond Mosquea- Ok thank you

Deyanira Martinez- Thank you guys, have a wonderful night.

Deyanira Martinez introduced the second application of the night, Jorge Lopez, 47 West Broad Street, Haverstraw, NY 10927- 27.45-1-41

Jorge Lopez- Jorge Lopez, 226 North Main Street, New City, NY 10956. This is a property on 47 West Broad Street. It’s an existing 3 family house. It used to be an eyesore. We bought it like a month ago and going through the process of doing renovations. For the record, there used to be an apartment there in 1969. In 1979, they merged the 2 properties; it used to be 2 separate lots, for tax purposes.

Ruben Berrios- He’s basically looking for habitable space in the basement. It’s going to have some bedrooms that’s going to be a part of the apartment on the first floor.

Deyanira Martinez- What is it that you’re proposing to put in the basement?

Jorge Lopez- 3 bedrooms. If you look at the lower level, that’s pretty much the layout. I have a bathroom and 3 bedrooms.

Deyanira Martinez- Is this a single family house right now?

Jose Hilario- No, this is a 3 family house and he wants to redo the basement, it’s already there.

Deyanira Martinez- But he said he wants to put 3 bedrooms in the basement to be part of the first floor, right?

Jorge Lopez- Correct

Jose Hilario- So he’s not really adding anything

Ruben Berrios- Just that our code requires that you come before the board to finish the basement.

Deyanira Martinez- Ok. It’s not like you’re going to change the structure at all. I propose to send this for public hearing next month. Does the board have any more questions?

Deyanira Martinez makes the motion to send the application to a Public Hearing at the March meeting.

RESOLUTION 03-2019 Motion by: Deyanira Martinez

Seconded by: Richard Santiago

Carried by: All

Deyanira Martinez introduced the final application of the night, Mendel Bochner, 28 Fourth Street, Haverstraw, NY 10927- 27.54-1-9

Ken Moran- Good evening, myname is Ken Moran, 11 North Airmont Road in Suffern. I’m the attorney for the applicant. This here is not the applicant, he is expediting the application for the applicant. He’s submitting all of the paperwork that has to be submitted.

Deyanira Martinez- Can you state your name please?

Eliezer Brecher- My name is Eliezer Brecher

Ken Moran- I wanted to thank you for taking us on such short notice, we were just at the Planning Board on Monday. We had submitted an application because this is for a conversion of a 2 family house into a 3 family house. There’s a 2 story garage in addition to the 2 family house on the premises, and they want to convert that garage into another residence, so it’ll be a 3 family residence. There’s 2 parking spaces there now, in the garage, which will remain. So in total, there will be 6 onsite parking spaces, so we would meet the parking requirements. It would be 2 per residential unit. They’re all onsite, everything is there. There was no construction proposed when we submitted it to the Planning Board, but the architect was asked to provide a layout of the garage, how it would be converted. The architect suggested that, while they were doing the interior, that part of the 2nd story slopes down so it’s only partially a 2 story. He suggested making the whole top 2 stories, to finish it up, because then the building is square rather than sloped down. This building; I looked it up and it’s amazing what information is available on the internet now on Zillow, not only does it have photographs of every house ever built. This was house was built in 1910, so it’s an existing house, we’re not proposing changing the footprint at all. It borders 3 streets, it’s a tough location it kind of has an odd shape to it. All of these bulk variances are all existing, we’re not going to change anything as far as that goes. We’re either going to keep the building the way it is and just convert what’s there or add the additional space on the top, which just came up today after the architect was preparing the plans. He suggested that we should do that so it would be more useful and it would make the building look better. So there’s a provision in the code, of the zoning code, it’s section 245-30 which regards non conforming bulk. And as long as it does not increase the degree or creating a new non conforming bulk, the Zoning Board can approve it, which is what the case is here. We’re not creating anything new, the bulk table will remain the same. We’re not crating any additional variance to the bulk and there’s no new bulk that is requiring a variance. It will remain exactly the same. So the Zoning Board has authority to approve that. So what we would need, in addition to the site plan approval from the Planning Board, we need a special permit from the Zoning Board, that’s why we were referred here. Since that time, I noticed that there was that provision in there about the bulk, if you’re going to expand it. We weren’t originally going to do it, but based on what the architect had drawn up, at this point, we’re going to request that we could expand that little end of the garage, so that the building would be squared off. So that’s what we’re asking for. The Planning Board determined that this is a Type II action so it doesn’t require any further environmental review. I prepared an Environmental Assessment form which you had requested.

Dennis Michaels- The Village Engineer asked for it. But that would be more for the Planning Board.

Ken Moran- We submitted a narrative to the Zoning Board. However, if we go ahead with this, we have to revise it. Provide for the additional building on the top floor.

Deyanira Martinez- Is the apartment that you’re adding also going to be 3 bedrooms?

Ken Moran- The architect came up with a couple of different layouts

Ruben Berrios- This sits on the top of the 2 garages, it’s a space that’s already finished.

Deyanira Martinez- Oh ok

Ken moran- So there would be a bedroom or another room downstairs and then upstairs would be 2 additional bedrooms. And somebody had mentioned that the garage had previously been used for residential purposes.

Ruben Berrios- Illegally

Ken Moran- Illegally, ok. It’s not being used now, it’s just a garage.

Jose Hilario- So it’ll be 2 rooms on the top of the garage

Ken Moran- This is the layout. I just received this today

Ruben Berrios- I think this is something that you guys to should go out and look at as well. Do a site visit because this building is right up to the property line.

Jose Hilario- We need to go and see it

Richard Santiago- To square off that section you’re talking about, will that add to the footprint?

Ken Moran- No, it’s only on the 2nd story. The footprints there aren’t going to change

Eliezer Brecher- If you see, you can see on this one, it’s only adding to the second floor, there will be no changes to the first.

Ken Moran- When you go look at it, you’ll see that the back kind of slopes down

Jose Hilario- So the space in the bottom will be the same?

Ken Moran- Yes, we’re keeping the 2 parking spaces there so that there are the required parking spaces on site. The curb cuts are already there, there’s basically no construction other than if we put in the addition on the house, on the upper floor.

Jose Hilario- What is behind that garage? Is there another house?

Ken Moran- It’s all streets on all sides

Ruben Berrios- It’s kind of a corner lot, more or less

Ken Moran- As far as the bulk regulations, it’s considered to have 3 front yards because it’s on 3 streets

Jose Hilario- I was worried because any time you add anything on the top, people will start having problems with the view

Ken Moran- At the end, it goes to a point

Richard Santiago- I would suggest a site visit for this one as well.

Dennis Michaels- Before I forget, I don’t know if Ken noted this in the bulk table; it’s not a bulk regulation, but zoning code section 245-30, that’s the provision that you see in many municipal.

Ken Moran- Yes, that’s what I just was mentioning but you weren’t paying attention

Dennis Michaels- Well then that’s definitely an accurate observation

Ken Moran- No I didn’t mean any offense

Dennis Michaels- Ok 245-30 should be added in the notice of Public Hearing and should be added to the bulk table, under the bulk table as an additional variance.

Ken Moran- I’ll add it to the narrative as well, but again, this just came up this afternoon.

Dennis Michaels- No, we didn’t know it was going for public hearing. So it’s good, 245-30 is a regulation in our zoning code that says that buildings with non conforming bulk cannot be enlarged.

Ken Moran- And then it goes on to say that as long as it doesn’t increase the non conforming bulk or creates a new variance.

Dennis Michaels- 245-30 just has to be listed as one of the variances. The applicant is in the relief from that proscription which says “Pre-existing non conforming bulk cannot be enlarged”, I’m summarizing it.

Deyanira Martinez- So you want to set up a site visit? Do you want to do it just before the meeting?

Jose Hilario- We can’t do both on the same day, it’s going to be too dark. We’re not going to have time to see both

Deyanira Martinez- But the other one, we’re going to go at separate times

Ruben Berrios- Yes, like I said I’m here all day

Jose Hilario- Well we have a whole month

Deyanira Martinez- Yes, but we have to let them know. Don’t you have to go inside the garage to see? Or just go from the outside?

Jose Hilario- No, but this one we should go on the 14th

Deyanira Martinez- Yes, on the same day, before the meeting. Because we can go inside and see

Jose Hilario- We can go inside and see

Richard Santiago- I can go during the day in between runs

Jose Hilario- Ok, we can go on the 14th, but you have to let the rest of the members know. Let’s say 6pm

Ken Moran- We’ll make sure to have somebody there so that you can get inside

Eleizer Brecher- You want to get inside as well?

Jose Hilario- I guess. Or do you think we should only see the outside?

Dennis Michaels- They don’t need to go inside

Ken Moran- So you don’t need anyone to meet to there?

Deyanira Martinez- No, we’ll just look outside. So maybe we should go on the same day that we do the other one, if we’re just going to look at the outside.

Ruben Berrios- You don’t have to go in, we can just from the outside

Deyanira Martinez- Ok, so you don’t have to be there

Ruben Berrios- Just so you know which structure it is, it’s the one where Middle Street starts, you know what I’m talking about? As soon as you get to Middle Street, to the right there

Ken Moran- We were supposed to go back to the Planning Board with the floor plan, which we’ll do, but we can’t obviously get the approval until the Zoning Board…

Dennis Michaels- No, that’s not true. There’s no SEQRA here, so you don’t need a negative declaration

Ken Moran- Ok, so it’ll be subject to the Zoning Board issuing a special permit?

Dennis Michaels- There’s a special use permit also involved?

Ruben Berrios- This is for a special permit, yes.

Dennis Michaels- And variances?

Ruben Berrios- And variances

Dennis Michaels- Ok

Ken Moran- My position is that we don’t need any variances, but that would be up to the board to determine

Ruben Berrios- You’re building with non conforming bulk

Ken Moran- But the way I read that section, it’s ok as long as we don’t create new bulk

Dennis Michaels- What section? 245-30? I’ll just read it, it’s short. It says: Normal maintenance and repair, structural alterations in and the moving reconstruction or enlargement of a building with non conforming bulk is permitted with the approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals, if the same does not increase the degree of or create any new non conforming bulk of such building.; I think that’s what you meant by the new variances. So, you are increasing the bulk of the building by adding to it.

Ken Moran- They’re talking about the bulk regulations. We’re not increasing the degree that it doesn’t conform with the bulk regulations. The side yards and everything will remain the same.

Ruben Berrios- I have to say that I haven’t reviewed any of this, so I really can’t say too much on it.

Deyanira Martinez- So should we set a public hearing for next month?

Dennis Michaels- Ok I see what Mr. Moran is saying. Let’s just finish this thought. You’re going higher, right?

Ken Moran- We’re just adding to the end of the 2nd floor, we’re adding an addition; or we’re proposing.

Dennis Michaels- So you’re not going higher than the existing structure?

Ken Moran- No. And we’re not increasing anything on the ground

Dennis Michaels- Where you’re building that addition, is that the rear yard? Or side yard? Is it a side yard, Eliezer?

Eliezer Brecher- It’s on the front side because it’s on a corner lot, so…

Ruben Berrios- It’s kind of tough. It’s in the back yard

Eliezer Brecher- It’s on this side here

Dennis Michaels- Alright so Ruben, on West Street, is that now a non-conforming side yard?

Ruben Berrios- Where?

Dennis Michaels- Over here. They’re putting the addition here above the 2 story garage?

Eliezer Brecher- That’s correct

Ruben Berrios- What was the questions?

Dennis Michaels- Is that already a non-conforming, I guess that’s a front yard, I suppose

Ruben Berrios- Yes, it’s right on the property line

Dennis Michaels- So my legal opinion has always been that you are expanding the bulk because say for example you’re a neighbor that lives on West Street; right now you’re looking at the side of the building that’s a certain height that is non-conforming as far as the setback from the lot line. It’s now getting twice as high, so in a sense, you are intensifying that non- conformity, for lack of a better word. So instead of looking at a non-conforming building that’s 10ft high, they’re going to be looking at a non-conforming building, that’s not getting any closer, but it’s getting twice as high. So to me, that triggers 245-30. I mean, you can disagree but that’s my legal opinion. I think the example is pretty clear, but let’s say you have a non-conforming building that’s 1 story high. It’s 5 feet from the property line, right? It’s non-conforming. Alright, we’re not going any closer to the property line but now it’s going to be 5 stories. To me, you’re extending the non-conforming bulk because instead of looking at a building that has a non-conforming 5 foot setback 1 story high, now you’re looking at a building that has a 5 foot setback that is now 5 or 6 stories high.

Eliezer Brecher- It’s only 10 feet more

Dennis Michaels- I’m not saying it’s bad. I’m just saying that that, to me, triggers 245-30

Ken Moran- That’s why you have attorneys, because we disagree on that

Dennis Michaels- But Ken, it’s just a regulation, like any other regulation, that this board can rant relief for.

Ken Moran- Absolutely. That’s why we’re going to be asking for, if you disagree with my interpretation, a variance to be granted. See, on the bulk table, all of those measurements are all going to be the same. There’s not going to be any change as far as the bulk table. So there really is no change in bulk conformity with this particular site.

Deyanira Martinez- So let’s schedule the public hearing and we’ll go and do the site visit?

Ken Moran- So you’re going to schedule the public hearing?

Dennis Michaels- In all fairness to Ruben, he just got this latest plan today so he hasn’t really digested it. So we’re going to send it for an actual public hearing?

Deyanira Martinez- Yes, for March 14th

Ken Moran- So it’ll be for the special permit, which we are required, and for the interpretation or variance of section 245-30

Dennis Michaels- Yes you can also ask for an interpretation

Ken Moran- As long as it gets approved, I don’t care how it’s interpreted.

Deyanira Martinez suggests a motion to send the application to a Public Hearing at the March meeting.

RESOLUTION 04-2019 Motion by: Jose Hilario

Seconded by: Richard Santiago

Carried by: All

Dennis Michaels- Also subject to Ruben reviewing the plans more comfortably because he may see another variance there. So we can put a note that right now we’re just saying that right now we’re just saying 245-30 & the special use permit, but there may be another variance after Ruben reviews the plans.

Ken Moran- How soon do we have to submit the mailings?

Dennis Michaels- Stephanie, when would you like the mailings sent?

Stephanie Serrano- By next week

Eliezer Brecher- When’s the date?

Dennis Michaels- The meeting is the 14th, but Stephanie would like the paperwork by next week. By Friday?

Stephanie Serrano- Yes, Friday’s fine

Deyanira Martinez- So you give her a call and she’ll give you all of the information that you need.

Ken Moran- And you’d like the posters up about 10 days before?

Stephanie Serrano- Yes

Ruben Berrios- You also want to have this when you go back to the Planning Board. So we want to get this to Eve and the members. Because you changed it, they only saw the original, so you’d have to get that done before the meeting.

Eliezer Brecher- Ok

Deyanira Martinez- Ok, thank you and see you next month.

Deyanira Martinez makes a motion to approve the meeting minutes for January 10, 2019

RESOLUTION 05-2019 Motion by: Deyanira Martinez

Seconded by: Richard Santiago

Carried by: All

The Clerk Typist to the Zoning Board of Appeals is hereby

Authorized, directed and empowered to sign these

Minutes, and file a copy thereof in the office of the

Village Clerk:

_______________________

Stephanie Serrano, Clerk Typist

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download