RATING SCALE FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION
RATING SCALE FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATIONEach of the Criteria should be graded according to the following scale. Please decide which category best describes the proposal in relation to each of the Criteria and award the whole points indicated (i.e., no decimal scores – decide on 3 or 4, not 3.5).POINTS 4Outstanding: A model for others to follow. 3Competent: Fully meets expected standards. 2Average: Generally meets most standards, but may have some flaws or gaps. 1 Poor: Barely meets or falls below expected standards, or has serious flaws or gaps. 0Inadequate: Does not meet minimum standards or misses the point.Erie County, Department of Human ServicesAndCity of Erie, Department of Economic and Community DevelopmentProposal Grading InstrumentForLocal Proposals – 2015 Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Consolidated ApplicationProposal Submitted by: WeightedCriteria Raw Score Multiplier Score (0 to 4) (raw x multiplier)1.Address Local Values and Principles2.52.Meets Local Priorities3.753.Ensures Agency Collaboration3.754.Quality of Proposed Project7.55.Cost Effectiveness of Proposal Projected3.756.Use of Other Resources3.75Total Points AwardedEvaluated by: Date: APPENDIX IThe High Priorities for the 2015 HUD Continuum of Care Competition are listed below.Individuals:Beds/Units:Permanent Supportive HousingSupportive Services:Case ManagementMental Health CareHousing PlacementEmploymentSub-Populations:Seriously Mentally IllDually Diagnosed MH/D&AVictims of Domestic ViolencePersons in Families with Children:Beds/Units:Transitional & Permanent HousingSupportive Services:Case ManagementChild CareSubstance Abuse TreatmentEmploymentSub-Populations:Seriously Mentally IllDually Diagnosed MH/D&AVictims of Domestic ViolenceAPPENDIX IIPRINCIPLES AND VALUESHelp individuals and family members develop the sense that they have – and can create – real options in their lives and can exercise some control in choosing among these options.An approach to care that uses the strengths of individuals and families to build additional skills and competencies will support individual and family integrity and will encourage persons to become more self-sufficient members of communities.Services are committed to using natural supports and concrete resources in conjunction with professional solutions.Individualized service planning is based on the consumers’ goals, significantly involving individuals and families and specifying outcomes, including mechanisms for coordinating services such as: housing, work, benefits, health and medication, transportation, social life, and crisis planning.Peer support is effective in promoting community integration.Consumers’ rights should be protected, and privacy and safety must be promoted.Housing should be fully integrated into existing communities.Help homeless persons move to self-sufficiency within their community. ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- likert scale response options dartmouth college
- 3 point rating scale
- cognitive therapy scale revised cts r
- 5 point rating scale british columbia
- penetration aspiration scale
- sample rubrics for physical education
- evaluation panel instructions template
- rating scale definition
- rating scale for proposal evaluation
- outcome measures tool kit veterans affairs
Related searches
- 4 point rating scale performance
- 4 point rating scale examples
- 5 point rating scale definitions
- 5 rating scale performance
- rating scale for performance reviews
- employee evaluation rating scale example
- performance evaluation rating scale examples
- performance review rating scale examples
- rating scale for performance evaluation
- 5 point rating scale examples
- rating scale for performance assessments
- rating scale for evaluation