A Proposal for ECG’s in pre-participation physical ...



A Proposal for ECG’s in pre-participation physical examinations (PPE) for college athletesWashburn University School of NursingNU 670- Graduate Project [Nov. 2, 2012]Tracy Hill, BSN, RN, MSN CandidateShirley Dinkel, PhD., APRN - Instructor9569453903345100000100000Implementing ECG’s as part of pre-participation physical examinations (PPE) for student athletesIntroductionAthletes are seen as one of the healthiest segments of our society. About 400,000 students between age 17 and 23 participate in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports every year. However, each year, about one in 44,000 players in the NCAA has sudden cardiac death (SCD) (Hendrick, 2011; Wong 2011). While still considered relatively rare, the rate of SCD in young athletes is higher than previous estimates (American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force [ACCF/AHA], 2011, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, 2012, NCAA, 2012, O’Connor et al., 1998, Subasic, 2010).The NCAA reports that the incidences of sudden cardiac death have been more prevalent among African-Americans (one in every 17,000 student-athletes per year) than Caucasians (one in 58,000). Additionally, men have been shown to be at greater risk (one per 33,000) than women (one in 76,000) (NCAA, 2012). Fortunately, the incidence of sudden death in an athlete, especially a young athlete, is a rare event, although the true incidence of SCD is unknown and probably underestimated due to the absence of a mandatory reporting system (Casa et al., 2012, NCAA, 2012). The incidence of SCD could be as high as 110 deaths each year in young athletes or 1 death every three days in the United States (Casa et al., 2012).Sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young athletes was first reported in the 1980s. SCD is defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) as “death resulting within minutes of an abrupt loss of heart function”, (Wong, 2011) or death “that is unexpected and non-traumatic and that occurs instantaneously or within a few minutes of an abrupt change in the person's previous clinical state” (O’Connor, Kugler, & Oriscello, 1998). SCD is the leading medical cause of death for student athletes, accounting for 16 percent of college-athlete deaths (Subasic, 2010). The overall prevalence of cardiac abnormalities responsible for SCD has been estimated to be 0.3% (3 in 1000) in the general athlete population, and while actual incidence rates of SCD are markedly lower, relatively few cardiac abnormalities lead to a fatal event in young athletes (O’Connor & Knoblauch, 2010). The NCAA required screenings for student athletes currently includes a comprehensive personal and family medical history, physical examination, and appropriate additional diagnostic testing, if warranted. Many NCAA institutions also offer an electrocardiogram (ECG) and/or echocardiogram as part of an athlete’s heart screen, although it is not a requirement (NCAA, 2012). A recent study by Wong (2011) report that while it is more expensive, researchers feel that ECGs are necessary to properly screen athletes for heart conditions. The University of Washington is one example of an institution that now requires ECGs on incoming freshman athletes as a result of the study, because in 2002, a woman’s basketball player on the UW team collapsed from heart failure and survived, and in 2006, the women’s basketball coach suffered a cardiac arrest, too. Both the former player and coach are now advocates for requiring testing nationwide, stating "The NCAA has an opportunity to take a stand in a positive way and mandate testing, and at the end of the day, what's a life really cost?" (Wong, 2011) According to a study led by Thomas DeBauche, MD, of Cypress Cardiology in Cypress, Texas, cost issues should no longer keep electrocardiograms out of most schools' efforts to screen student athletes for potentially fatal heart problems. Researchers reported that due to recent declines in the price of ECG machines, students can be screened for a cost of less than $3 each after an initial investment of under $500 per school (Phend, 2009). Problem StatementHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is reported as the most common cause of unexplained sudden cardiac death in young athletes (Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, 2012, NCAA, 2012, Subasic, 2010). Prevention of SCD in athletes requires early recognition of those conditions known to cause SCD (O’Connor & Knoblauch, 2010). Adequate screening and evaluation are important to identify and counsel persons with underlying cardiovascular disease before they begin exercising at moderate to vigorous levels (“AHA/ACSM Joint Position Statement“, 1998). The purpose of this project is to apply evidence-based practice (EBP) recommendations to 1) Discuss current evidence available to support implementing ECG screenings as part of the pre-participation physical examination (PPE) for student athletes at WU, 2)Enhance high quality care that is safe to all athletes by early recognition and detection of cardiac problems that may lead to SCD, 3) In collaboration with the Department of Kinesiology Athletic Training Education Program, it is proposed that athletic training students be trained to properly perform ECGs as part of enhancement to their core curriculum for KN 492: Clinical Experiences in Athletic Training- General 4) Implement ECG screening as part of PPE for all student athletes at WU. Included will be a proposal for funding to obtain the appropriate equipment and training necessary to perform and interpret ECG’s for student-athletes as part of the PPE and implementation of diagnostic tools. Currently, routine ECG’s are not performed as part of the PPE at WU.Significance to NursingHealth care providers, including Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs), play an important role in correctly performing and interpreting ECG’s, and appropriately identifying and referring those with abnormal ECGs. In 1996, pre-participation sports screenings became a joint public health initiative and are supported by the AHA. The guidelines are not mandated or presented as a national standard, and their purpose is to identify risks and prevent injury in competitive athletes. They are routinely updated, widely accepted, and endorsed as standards of care by numerous medical and sports related associations (Subasic, 2010). Currently, there is no standardized guideline for the performance and evaluation of ECGs as part of student athlete physicals at Washburn University. Properly trained WU athletic training students and faculty, along with medical providers, can increase overall safety during athletic activities in those unknowingly vulnerable to SCD by: 1) Implementing diagnostic tools such as ECG equipment, 2) Educating and training athletic training students to perform ECGs, and 3) Utilizing ECG’s as part of pre-participation sports physicals for student-athletes at WU. By increasing knowledge and awareness of evidence based guidelines and standards about SCD and ECG’s in pre-participation sports physicals, WU is in a position to provide early detection, recognition and treated of patients at risk for SCD. By implementing ECG screenings for student athletes, the providers potentially improve health outcomes and potentially save lives of student athletes, before SCD occurs. WU Department of Kinesiology Athletic Training Education Program faculty and students, along with the WU Athletic Department and the University have the potential to be at the forefront of implementing current European and Olympic recommendations for ECG screenings for athletes and what may soon be “best practice” nationally as well. It is vital that educators and practitioners recognize the need to have a procedure to provide the most up to date evidence based care to improve patient outcomes. This proposal, intended to reduce the potential risk of SCD in student athletes, provides the opportunity for WU to enhance the comprehensiveness of services for student athletes and promotes multidisciplinary collaboration in an effort to improve outcomes and facilitate prompt recognition and treatment of patients at risk for SCD. ECGs as part of a PPE, if implemented, could minimize cardiovascular risk associated with sports. Health care providers, including APRNs, play an important role in correctly performing and interpreting ECG’s, and appropriately identifying and referring those with abnormal ECGs.There is general consensus that within a benevolent society there is a responsibility on the part of healthcare providers to initiate prudent efforts to identify life-threatening diseases in athletes to minimize cardiovascular risk associated with sports (Maron et al., 1996). There also appears to be an implied ethical and possibly legal obligation on the part of educational institutions to implement cost-efficient strategies to ensure that their athletes are not subject to unacceptable medical risks. ECGs as part of a PPE, if implemented, could minimize cardiovascular risk associated with sports.An ECG is universally acknowledged as more likely to identify serious cardiac problems, and it has been adopted as an international standard for screening in much of the world. The European Society of Cardiology and the International Olympic Committee have recommended the addition of ECGs to pre-participation sports physicals for college athletes. An ECG is required prior to sports participation in the International Olympics and is practiced by 92% of professional sports teams in the United States (Subasic, 2010).In collaboration with the Department of Kinesiology Athletic Training Education Program at Washburn University, a guideline that includes ECG screening as part of the student-athlete pre-participation sports physical is suggested. It is also suggested that the a local cardiologist review all ECG’s and be consulted for any potential abnormal ECG’s to determine if further testing is warranted. As forerunners in the initiative, WU has the opportunity to be among the first to implement the already recommended international and Olympic standards for ECG screenings in athletes, an initiative that may soon be “best practice” nationally as well. Project ObjectivesCurrently, the WU Athletic Training Education Program and the Athletic Department does not have a guideline for including ECGs as part of the PPE. This proposal presents implementing ECG screenings as part of the PPE for student athletes, necessary training for athletic training faculty and students to effectively perform ECGs, and exploring funding sources for a 12 lead ECG machine and necessary equipment and supplies. There are six objectives for this project. They include:1) Review of literature to include current national guidelines for the pre-participation physical examination (PPE) and ECG screening and interpretation recommendations for student athletes; 2) Review of current practices at the WU Department of Kinesiology Athletic Training Education Program and Athletic Department for PPE and ECG screenings for student athletes 3) Propose a guideline for the inclusion of ECGs in PPE for student athletes at Washburn University; 4) Educate WU athletic training faculty and staff in proper ECG placement and performance and 5) Recommend a referral procedure for overread of all ECG’s and follow-up of students determined to be at increased risk and 6) Explore funding sources for 12 Lead ECG equipment and supplies for WU Department of Kinesiology Athletic Training Education Program.Background of the ProblemCurrent guidelines for pre-participation screening of competitive athletes in the US include a comprehensive history and physical examination. There were five objectives to this proposal, including 1)Determine the value of electrocardiography (ECG) added to a PPE screening in college athletes, 2) Provide the opportunity for Washburn University to be more active in preventing SCD in student athletes, 3) Revise and enhance the course curriculum for KN 492: Clinical Experiences in Athletic Training- General Medical to include education and training on performing ECGs, 4) Write a curriculum grant to help fund necessary ECG equipment and supplies for revised course, including development of a budget, 5) Educate providers on current standards and recommend assessment tools, including a new pre-participation physical examination (PPE) form.Pre-participation cardiovascular screening is the systematic practice of medically evaluating large, general populations of athletes before participation in sports for the purpose of identifying, or raising suspicion of abnormalities that could provoke disease progression or sudden death (American Heart Association [AHA], 2007, p. 1643). The American Heart Association (AHA) has published guidelines for pre participation sports physicals. The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Association (HCMA) encourages each state to use these guidelines when updating their requirements for participation in high schools and college level programs. According to the WU Athletic Training Department, student PPEs does not currently include an ECG. Currently, all Big 12 Division 1 institutions, including Kansas State University and the University of Kansas, both within 58 miles of Washburn University, include an ECG and echocardiogram on all incoming athletes as part of their PPEs. For the purpose of collecting data on ECG screenings from schools similar in size to Washburn, this author attempted to contact the athletic training staff at each of the five Division II schools in Kansas. The Division II Universities in Kansas include Emporia State University, Emporia, KS, Fort Hays State University, Hays, KS, Newman University, Wichita, KS, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS, and Washburn University in Topeka, KS. The athletic training staff at each of the universities was contacted by email, asking whether or not these schools did routine ECG screenings as part of their PPE for their student athletes. At the time of this proposal, Washburn University’s athletic training staff was the only school to respond to the email. Currently, Washburn University does not conduct ECG’s on their student athletes as part of their PPE, citing “it is very cost prohibitive to screen every athlete with the ECGs, although we do not hesitate if it is warranted” (personal communication, Karen Garrison, MA, ATC, LAT, Clinical Education Coordinator/Asst. Athletic Trainer, Washburn University, April 23, 2012). At this time, the only time they order ECGs for their student athletes is if there is a family medical history or something abnormal on their PPE (Appendix A). Officials in the athletic department at WU also cite the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA) Position Statement: Preventing Sudden Death in Sports, quoting that "The pre-participation physical examination (PPE) should include the completion of a standardized history form and attention to episodes of exertional syncope or pre-syncope, chest pain, a personal or family history of sudden cardiac arrest or a family history of sudden death, and exercise intolerance." (personal communication, Karen Garrison, MA, ATC, LAT, Clinical Education Coordinator/Asst. Athletic Trainer, Washburn University, April 23, 2012), (Casa et al., 2012). It is noteworthy, however, that the NATA also reports that pre-participation screening is one strategy available to prevent SCD, and that the best protocol to screen athletes is highly debated, and some methods lack accuracy. Additionally, the NATA Position Statement on preventing SCD in sports reports that “As many as 80% of patients with SCD are asymptomatic until sudden cardiac arrest occurs, suggesting that screening by history and physical examination alone may have limited sensitivity to identify athletes with at-risk conditions.” (Casa et al., 2012). Exercise-associated acute cardiac events generally occur in individuals with structural cardiac disease. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a condition that is generally not compatible with competitive athletics and therefore those with HCM should not participate in most athletic programs. HCM has been proven to be the leading cardiovascular cause of SCD in the young athlete population, accounting for about one third of events (American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force [ACCF/AHA], 2011, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, 2012, , 2012, O’Connor et al.,1998, Subasic, 2010). Theoretical FrameworkThe Shuler Nurse Practitioner Practice Model was used as the theoretical framework for developing this proposal. The Model presents a holistic approach to delivery of patient care and to evaluation of services provided. The four concepts of person, health, nursing and environment, along with the concept of the NP role, are intrinsic to the Shuler Nurse Practitioner Practice Model (Shuler, 2000). It is based on nursing research and scientifically supported generalizations that are relative to the NP practice areas. School Based Health Centers (SBHC) are in a unique position to assist with development of positive health behaviors by providing holistic services, including ECG screenings for student athletes, as well as all patients who receive services at SBHC. To deliver holistic services, the SBHC must have a multidisciplinary team comprised of health care providers, mental health counselors, health educators, nutritionists, social workers, teachers and support staff (Shuler, 2000). WUSHS onsite team leader/manager is an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) responsible for the coordination of SBHC services delivered, provision of primary care, and evaluation of services rendered. As a result of the holistic treatment plan, patient problems related to unmet basic needs, including underlying cardiac problems potentially uncovered by a routine ECG, can be identified. The development and implementation of a holistic treatment plan should include consultation and referral to multidisciplinary team members and other resource agencies. The Shuler Nurse Practitioner Practice Model was used as the theoretical basis for the proposal because it presents a holistic approach to patient assessment, problem identification/diagnosis determination, treatment, and evaluation.Review of LiteratureOverviewA systematic literature review and critical analysis of available articles was completed. The literature review utilized the following databases: PubMed, ProQuest, UpToDate, SAGE, Cochrane, Google scholar and CINAHL databases, as well as searches of websites of relevant organizations (e.g. AHA, ACSM, NATA, and NCAA). Key words used included ECG, college athletes, cardiovascular screening, guidelines, pre-participation physical examination, NCAA, sudden cardiac death, screening, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, prevalence, incidence and genetic cardiovascular disease. Applicable articles were limited to English language sources, and human studies. Articles published in the last 15 years were included. Bibliographies of all relevant articles were visually searched to retrieve additional articles. Twenty-five applicable articles were then reviewed in full for inclusion in this proposal.In 1996, pre-participation sports screenings became a joint public health initiative supported by the AHA. The guidelines are not mandated or presented as a national standard, and their purpose is to identify risks and prevent injury in competitive athletes. They are routinely updated, widely accepted, and endorsed as standards of care by numerous medical and sports related associations (Subasic, 2010). The most recent update was in 2007. The moving force behind the update was the age of the original recommendations, as well as a strong debate as to whether a 12-lead ECG should be added to the recommended practice guidelines. The AHA decided, despite continued debate, that an ECG was not recommended at that time due to limited resources, cost, and the potential for false-positive results; therefore, the utilization of an ECG for sports physicals remains optional. However, an ECG is universally acknowledged as more likely to identify serious cardiac problems, and it has been adopted as an international standard for screening in much of the world. The ECG is viewed at the most cost-effective cardiovascular screening modality (Subasic, 2010).Subasic (2010), also reports that the screening of athletes prior to participation in competitive sports usually falls short of recommended guidelines. Currently, the NCAA requires all student-athletes beginning their initial season of eligibility and students who are trying out for a team to undergo a medical examination before engaging in any physical activity with the team, and each subsequent year, an updated medical history is administered (NCAAwebsite, 2012, p. 2). Currently, the NCAA does not require ECGs on student athletes as part of their PPE, it remains optional.In the June 2011 issue of The American Journal of Medicine, researchers collected electrocardiograms and echocardiograms of 964 athletes at a single university and found that distinct ECG abnormalities were present in 10% and were more common in males as well as black athletes. Two athletes were subsequently excluded from competition (Elsevier, 2011)DefinitionSudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of death in exercising young athletes (Casa et al., 2012). SCD is defined by the AHA as “death resulting within minutes of an abrupt loss of heart function”, and is the leading medical cause of death for student athletes, accounting for 16 percent of college-athlete deaths (Wong, 2011). SCD is unexpected and non-traumatic and occurs instantaneously or within a few minutes of an abrupt change in the person's previous clinical state (O’Connor, Kugler, & Oriscello, 1998).The underlying cause of SCD is usually a structural cardiac abnormality. HCM and coronary artery anomalies are responsible for approximately 25% and 14% of SCD, respectively, in the United States. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by a thickened left ventricular wall that causes an enlarged heart and while many people with HCM live a normal life and do not experience health-related problems, HCM is currently the most common genetic heart disease and most frequent cardiovascular cause of sudden death in young athletes (AHA, 2007, NCAA, 2012). HCM is often detectable by ECG, and in the general population may occur in as many as one in every 500 individuals. The clinical spectrum is broad and complex, encompassing the risk for sudden cardiac death predominantly in the young and heart failure disability at any age (Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, 2012).Pathophysiology/Clinical ManifestationsSudden Cardiac Death is a syndrome defined by its clinical presentation rather than by a discrete pathophysiology. SCD is a sudden state of circulatory failure due to loss of cardiac systolic function and is the result of 4 specific cardiac rhythm disturbances: ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole (Epocrates, 2012). SCD is instantaneous and most individuals become unconscious within seconds to minutes as a result of insufficient cerebral blood flow. SCD can occur in patients who have no previous history of heart disease. However, underlying heart disease is present in the vast majority of patients with SCD and identification of the patient at risk for sudden death or definition of the factors that result in the precipitation of the fatal arrhythmia continues to represent a major challenge. In SCD, there are usually no predictive symptoms, but if present, they are nonspecific and include chest discomfort, palpitations, shortness of breath and weakness.The “athletic heart” describes a heart that has a structural change of the heart wall, suggestive of HCM, and is often seen in athletes who train at high levels. The AHA reports that The American College of Cardiology Bethesda Conference No. 36, as well as the European Society of Cardiology guidelines indicate that risk for SCD is increased during intense competitive sports and also suggests that the removal of those individuals with HCM from the athletic arena can diminish their risk (ACCF/AHA, 2011). Causes of sudden cardiac death in young competitive athletes that constitute the largest percentages associated with SCD in student-athletes are included in Figure 1(Subasic, 2010).Epidemiology of SCD in AthletesSudden cardiac death (SCD) most commonly occurs in male athletes, who have estimated death rates nearly fivefold greater than the rates of female athletes. Congenital cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of non-traumatic sudden athletic death, with HCM being the most common cause (O’Connor et al., 1998). Adding other heart conditions known to cause sudden cardiac death, the prevalence of serious underlying heart disorders may approach three in every 1,000 student-athletes. A study on sudden cardiac death conducted by Harmon, K, et al (2008), in which researchers gathered data from the NCAA, along with news reports and insurance claims, found that college athletes across the nation suffer from sudden cardiac death up to seven times more frequently than previously reported (Wong, 2011). The study tracked deaths from 2004-2008, and reported that about 400,000 students between age 17 and 23 participate in NCAA sports every year. The researchers reported that the total number of deaths from all causes were 273, and 29%, or 80 of those athletes, died from medical causes and 56% of those deaths were cardiovascular-related sudden deaths. Researchers have also found that among the 400,000 athletes who participate in NCAA sports every year, the incidences of SCD have been more prevalent among African-Americans, 1: 17,000 student-athletes per year, than Caucasians, 1:58,000. Male basketball players have the highest rate of sudden cardiac death and men have been shown to be at greater risk than women (NCAA, 2012, Wong, 2011).The design of a screening strategy must take into account the fact that sudden cardiac death in athletes is an infrequent event and that only a small proportion of participants in organized sports in the United States is at risk. There are approximately 4 million competitive high school–age athletes in addition to 500,000 collegiate and 5,000 professional athletes (Maron et al., 1996). According to the American Heart Association, 1 in every 350 young people has an undetected heart condition, and sudden cardiac arrest happens among exercising youth once every three days in the United States (AHA, 2012). According to the Washburn University Department of Institutional Research (2011), in the fall of 2011, there were 7,303 students enrolled at Washburn University, and of those, 271 were student athletes. Therefore, it is possible, and maybe probable, that at least one student athlete at WU has an undetected heart condition.The NCAA points out that many schools require only that students fill out a family history regarding cardiac problems and have a qualified provider listen to their hearts. They also report that heart disorders are more common than might be expected in a population group that is perceived to be healthy, such as student athletes. Due to its sudden and often unrecognized nature, the epidemiologic characteristics of SCD are difficult to determine with precision, nevertheless, estimates can be made. Survival is estimated at <20% for patients presenting out-of-hospital with VF, and <10% overall for patients presenting with out-of-hospital SCD (Rhea, Eisenberg, & Sinibaldi, 2004). An ECG can only detect 60% of those at risk for sudden cardiac death. There are some conditions that cannot be detected with an ECG. Until further testing is available, ECG is the best and most cost-effective tool to detect those at risk.The Sudden Death in Athletes U.S. Registry is maintained by Dr. Barry Maron of the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation. The data compiled in this important registry helps to clearly define the causes of sudden death in U.S. Athletes. It has been proven through this registry that the leading cause of sudden cardiac arrest and death in this population remains HCM (Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Association [HCMA], 2009). The registry includes 1,866 US athletes between the ages of 8 and 39 who participated in 38 different sports and who died suddenly or survived cardiac arrest. Of the deaths, 56% were due to cardiovascular disease. HCM in the general population may occur in as many as one in every 500 individuals. According to Maron (HCMA, 2009), among the 1,049 deaths due to cardiovascular disease, the highest number of events in a single year was 76, with an average of 66 events per year during the last six years of data collection for the registry.Current RecommendationsAlthough routinely practiced in Europe, promoted by the International Olympic Committee, and mandated in Italy, pre-participation screening including 12-lead ECG is not commonly performed in competitive collegiate athletes in the US. Current recommendations for cardiovascular screening call for a careful history and physical examination performed by a knowledgeable health care provider. According to Subasic (2010), screening of athletes prior to participation in competitive sports usually falls short of recommended guidelines. Many schools require only that a student fill out a family history regarding cardiac problems and have a physician listen to their hearts. Poorly defined legislation and the absence of a national standard for sports physicals have contributed to the inadequate health screenings of athletes. Currently, the NCAA requires all student-athletes beginning their initial season of eligibility and students who are trying out for a team to undergo a medical examination before engaging in any physical activity with the team, and each subsequent year, an updated medical history is administered (NCAA, 2012). The NCAA required screenings for student athletes currently includes a comprehensive personal and family medical history, physical examination, and appropriate additional diagnostic testing, if warranted. Many NCAA institutions also offer an electrocardiogram (ECG) and/or echocardiogram as part of an athlete’s heart screen, although it is not a requirement (NCAA, 2012). Issues related to the methodology and justification for pre-participation screening, including use of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), has become a complex area of debate. Traditionally, member institutions of the NCAA have been independently responsible for their own pre-participation evaluation process and the design of the institutional screening history and physical examination (AHA, 2007, p. 7). Currently, the AHA panel does not believe it to be either prudent or practical to recommend the routine use of tests such as 12-lead ECG or echocardiography in the context of mass, universal screening (AHA, 2007). Clearly, the role of routine ECG screening in the United States to prevent SCD is not settled and will require more data and debate.Effectiveness of ECG in PreventionBroad-scale ECG screening has not been tested or implemented in the United States, although some US studies have suggested that ECG screening may be cost-effective on the basis of estimated cost per year of lives saved. According to Phend (2009), the addition of a 12-lead ECG screening would cost just $300 per year of life saved. Another study by Magalski, et al. (2011) reported that recent data in high school and college athletes demonstrated that ECG is associated with 2.1 life-years saved per 1000 athletes, an incremental cost of $89 per athlete, and a cost-effectiveness ratio of $42,900 per life-year saved. Compared with no screening, use of ECG with history and physical examination also was associated with 2.6 life-years saved per athlete, an incremental cost of $199, and a cost-effectiveness ratio of $76,100 per life-year saved (Magalski, 2011). The sensitivity of ECG among elite and professional athletic populations is estimated to range from 51% to 70%, and specificity is reported in the range of 62% to 98%. Additionally, mandatory screening of Japanese schoolchildren since 1973 has demonstrated a greater sensitivity of ECG versus history and physical examination. (O’Connor & Knoblauch, 2010).Lawless, the team doctor for U.S. Figure Skating and a cardiology consultant to Major League Soccer (MLS), said that taking a regular history and physicals of athletes may only detect a disease such as HCM two to six percent of the time, while the ECG can pick it up 50 to 80 percent of the time (Subasic, 2010). Lawless also reports that ECG readings are abnormal in 95% of patients with HCM and provide the ability to suspect other cardiac abnormalities associated with sudden death. In Europe, and particularly Italy, universal ECGs are performed on athletes and are heavily promoted as having reduced the incidence of sudden death (Subasic, 2012). Italy pioneered nationwide screening of athletes with ECG in the late 1990s, and subsequently revealed a 90% drop in sudden cardiac events after the screening program began (Isaacson, 2010, Phend, 2009). Competitive Italian athletes undergo required PPE and ECG, with ECG reportedly demonstrating 77% greater power to detect HCM than history and physical examination alone (O’Connor & Knoblauch, 2010).The European Society of Cardiology and the International Olympic Committee have recommended the addition of ECGs to pre-participation sports physicals for college athletes. An ECG is required prior to sports participation in the International Olympics and is practiced by 92% of professional sports teams in the United States (Subasic, 2010,). In 2004, the International Olympic Medical Committee issued a screening protocol including ECG for Olympic athletes (American Academy of Pediatrics [AAP], 2012). In 2005, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) issued a consensus statement on cardiovascular pre-participation screening of all young competitive athletes younger than 35 years, recommending a 12-lead ECG in addition to focused history and physical examination (AAP, 2012, Malhotra et al., 2011). The AHA recommends only history and physical without ECG (AHA, 2007, Malhotra et al., 2011). An ECG may show QT interval, ST-segment or T-wave changes, conduction abnormalities and ventricular hypertrophy. Lawless (2010) presented research to the AHA supporting the AHA's belief that universal ECG tests may result in a high rate of false-positive results, prompting unnecessary follow-up tests (Isaacson, 2010). Though ECGs are not as thorough as imaging tests like an echocardiogram, which shows a 3-D view of the heart, they are cheaper and easier to conduct on a wider basis.A recent study found that although ECG screening results in many false positives resulting in additional tests, the overall cost per diagnosis of adding ECG screening is similar to that of history and physical screening alone (Malhotra et al., 2011). The study at the University of Virginia, conducted over 5 years, included all 1,473 of their competitive athletes, and each athlete was screened with a history, physical and with ECGs using European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines with follow-up testing as dictated by clinical symptoms and ECG findings. The authors demonstrated that adding ECGs to an athletic screening program discovered significant pathology in college athletes (Malhotra et al., 2011). In the study, history and physical alone uncovered five significant cardiac abnormalities. Additional testing with ECGs confirmed eight significant cardiac abnormalities that were not found by history and physical alone (Malhotra et al., 2011). Consideration must also be given to the interpretation of ECGs. Computer-generated interpretations of ECG’s are often inaccurate and can result in inappropriate treatment (Anh, Krishnan, & Bogun, 2006) Accurate provider over-reading is necessary to avoid such errors. Over-reading of 12 lead ECG’s is required to circumvent errors of computerized ECG interpretation. Cardiologists as primary readers more often corrected the misinterpreted ECGs as compared with internists, emergency physicians, or other specialists (94% vs. 71%, P < .001) (Anh, Krishnan, & Bogun, 2006). Not only should the cardiologist review the ECG, but should also have access to any relevant clinical information to assist in interpretation.Recent data collection from a local hospital revealed it costs $17-$20 for a 12 lead ECG with interpretation from a cardiologist and report (CPT 93000); the ECG charge was $44.25, reimbursement from Medicare was $17.70, and was $20 from commercial insurance carriers (personal communication, Sheryle D’Amico, MHA, VP Physician Division, Lawrence Memorial Hospital, June 5, 2012). Additionally, college students are required to carry health insurance, so the cost for the university and the student athlete could be minimal, as many insurers will cover 80 to 100 percent of the costs. Finally, the goal of any screening effort is to identify individuals at risk; unaffected or low-risk individuals should be cleared, and conversely, those affected should be appropriately restricted, counseled, and treated. No screening protocol has yet proven to be effective in their role or validated as highly effective. The AHA has documented a 12-element recommendation for pre-participation screening of competitive athletes (Table 1). This process will minimize unnecessary variation. Implementation PlanThere are many options to explore to incorporate ECG screenings as part of PPE for student athletes at WU. The primary goal of this project will be obtaining an ECG machine and necessary equipment to properly screen current and future student athletes as part of their PPE. Initially, I plan to collaborate with the Washburn University Department of Kinesiology Athletic Training Education Program to review proposed guidelines and formulate a clinical guideline that can be applied to WU. Statistics for student athletes show that in the fall of 2011 there were 271 student athletes at WU. If WU decided to implement ECG screenings for all new or transfer athletes, that would be about 68 athletes per year. Collaboration with the WU Athletic Training Education Program, and other community resources such as a local hospital, and/or the medical director for WU Athletic Department will help meet project goals. This collective effort will facilitate establishment of a collaborative agreement for over-read of ECGs, and referrals for those at higher risk.Solicitation of funds for EKG equipment and necessary supplies could include a proposal that the Washburn University Athletic Department purchase all necessary ECG equipment necessary for initiating and implementing, as well as continuation of ECG screenings as part of the PPE for student athletes. Another option would be to collaborate with WU Department of Kinesiology Athletic Training Program and the WU Athletic Department, along with other community resources such as local hospitals, to explore the possibility of a community outreach program with Washburn University that would include a donation of the necessary ECG equipment and to absorb the cost of ECG screening and interpretation by their contracted clinicians as part of community outreach endeavors. Other potential options for funding, including, but not limited to: a Curriculum Development Grant, WU Alumni donation, WU Endowment Association donation, WUSON alumni donation, WU Athletic Department donation, Stormont Vail HealthCare and/or St. Francis Health Center Endowment Association donation, personal donations, fundraising efforts, etc. Additionally, securing a donation of ECG equipment and materials as part of a community outreach project collaboration with WU Athletic Department could ensure screening all student athletes with an ECG as part of their PPE, and could help reduce the risk of SCD in student athletes. This proposal also recommends that all providers in the WU Athletic Training Education Program obtain education and training on proper ECG placement. It is recommended that continuing education for providers include courses related to cardiovascular issues in student athletes. It is suggested that the WU Athletic Training Education Program students could be required to spend at least 2 hours in the WU Athletic Training facility doing ECGs during physical exam screenings for student- athletes. A simplified algorithm could be used, and may help clinicians correctly identify both suspected electrode misplacements and artifacts (Baranchuk et al., 2009, p. 67). Basic ECG interpretation course for all medical providers at WU should be required. I have included an example of an ECG competency checklist as a potential checklist to utilize for the WU Athletic Training Education Program course curriculum. Once approval is given by the WU Athletic Training Education Department director, education and training will begin for the staff on the clinical practice guidelines and associated ECG competency training utilizing the 12 lead ECG competency check-list as a guide. WU Athletic Training Education Program staff and students will watch two provided videos on ECG placement and performance (Appendix D), and will have the opportunity to practice their skills prior to ECG competency skills check-off. A 12 lead ECG instructive poster will be placed in all exam rooms for reference (Appendix E, , 2012).Project OutputsThe first project output will be providing a training packet and guidelines for WU Athletic Training Education Program faculty and students. The guidelines will include an updated health history and physical exam form, and ECG screening and referral recommendations. Next, funding options for ECG equipment and supplies will be explored. Funding requests would include ECG equipment and supplies. A proposed budget has been prepared and it is projected that the funds would cover necessary equipment and supplies for 2 years expenses for training athletic training students on proper ECG placement and performance, and performing ECGs for student athletes for their PPE. (Appendix G). This information, including the prosed budge, will be submitted with a curriculum development grant for the 2012-2013 academic year. If approved, and funding is secured to purchase ECG equipment and supplies, WU students enrolled in KN 492: Clinical Experiences in Athletic Training- General Medical, will be educated on the guideline and trained on proper ECG placement and performance, with a mandatory competency implemented. An example of an ECG placement and performance competency is included in Appendix F; it will need slight modification for WU Athletic Training Education Program specifics. WU Athletic Training Education Program staff will submit the ECGs to Dr. Messmer or other appropriate clinician for final review and further recommendation. It will be suggested that Dr. Messmer, the medical director for the WU Athletic Department, be up to date and comfortable with 12 lead ECG interpretation prior to implementing ECG screenings as part of the PPEs for student athletes, so that proper 12 lead ECG interpretations can be attempted. The services of a local cardiologist should be secured in order to provide accurate over-read of all ECGs to determine those individuals at higher risk and in need of follow-up. ConclusionThe knowledge and research about SCD and ECG screenings in student athletes remains controversial due to cost containment limitations, and thus will warrant further research on cost-effectiveness in smaller university settings before widespread implementation is initiated. This project should help guide future research and optimally aid in the implementation of ECG screenings for all student athletes at the college level. ECG screening of U.S. college athletes can uncover significant cardiac pathology not discovered by history and physical alone. Although ECG screening also results in many false positives resulting in additional tests, the overall cost per diagnosis of adding ECG screening is similar to that of history and physical screening alone.Early detection of clinically significant cardiovascular disease through pre-participation screening permits timely therapeutic interventions that may prolong life. While the results of an ECG may require additional evaluation and testing by a medical provider, this author believes that the benefit of this potentially life-saving screening outweighs this concern. Endorsement of required ECG screenings in college athletes is pertinent and come from organizations such as the AHA, ACSM, NATA, and NCAA in order for collegiate institutions to implement ECGs nationally.Dissemination PlanProject defense presentation to the WU School of Nursing Faculty is planned for December 11, 2012. In addition, if funding is secured to begin this project, a presentation will be planned in Fall 2013 to a group of WU Athletic Training Education Program staff and students regarding ECG screenings as part of pre-participation physical examinations for college athletes. Discussion will include the need for further research and consideration by university institutions to implement ECGs for SCD screening as part of PPE in all college athletes. Discussions will also include whether the endorsement of required ECG screenings in college athletes should come from organizations such as the AHA, ACSM, NATA, and NCAA in order for collegiate institutions to implement ECGs nationally. Final project results with be shared with the WU Department of Kinesiology Athletic Training Education Program, the WU Athletic Department, and the WU School of Nursing. ReferencesAHA/ACSM Joint Position Statement: Recommendations for Cardiovascular Screening, Staffing, and Emergency Policies at Health/Fitness Facilities. (1998, June). Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 30, 1009-1018. Retrieved from Academy of Pediatrics. (2012). Pediatric Sudden Cardiac Arrest. Retrieved from College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force . (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Retrieved from Heart Association. (2007). Recommendations and Considerations Related to Pre-participation Screening for Cardiovascular Abnormalities in Competitive Athletes: 2007 Update. A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Scientific Statement). Retrieved from Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Association: Medical Society for Sports Medicine. (2010). Pre-participation Physical Evaluation Form. Retrieved from Nurses Association. (2001). Code of Ethics. In Code of Ethics for Nurses. Retrieved from , D., Krishnan, S., & Bogun, F. (2006). Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis. Journal of Electrocardiology, 39, 343-345. doi: Press. (2012). D. Venkatesh collapses, dies. Retrieved from Press. (2012). Fabrice Muamba facing long recovery. Retrieved March 23, 2012, from , A., Shaw, C., Alanazi, H., Campbell, D., Bally, K., Redfearn, D. P., Simpson, C. S., & Abdollah, H. (2009, February). Electrocardiography Pitfalls and Artifacts: The 10 Commandments. Critical Care Nurse, 29(1), 67-73. doi: 10.4037/ccn2009607Casa, D. J., Guskiewicz, K. M., Anderson, S. A., Courson, R. W., Heck, J. F., Jimenez, C. C., McDermott, B. P., ... Walsh, K. M. (2012, February). National Athletic Trainers’ Association Position Statement: Preventing Sudden Death in Sports. Journal of Athletic Training, 47, 96-118. Retrieved from , B. (2011). Heart-Related Deaths in College Athletes: How Common? Each Year, About One in 44,000 Collegiate Athletes Has Sudden Cardiac Death, Study Finds. Retrieved from Cardiomyopathy Association. (2009). Sudden Death in Athletes Registry. Retrieved from , M. (2010). Sometimes, there are no answers; Adams’ death raises issue of medical testing. Retrieved from , A., McCoy, M., Zabel, M., Magee, L.M., Goeke, J., Main, M., Bunten, L., Reid, K., & Ramza, B. (2011, June). Cardiovascular Screening with Electrocardiography and Echocardiography in Collegiate Athletes. The American Journal of Medicine, 124, 511-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.01.009Malhotra, R., West, J., Dent, J., Luna, M., Kramer, C. M., Mounsey, J. P., Battle, R., ... Mahapatra, S. (2011, May). Cost and yield of adding electrocardiography to history and physical in screening Division I intercollegiate athletes: A 5-year experience. Heart Rhythm Society, 8, 721-727. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.024Maron, B. J., Thompson, P. D., Puffer, J. C., McGrew, C. A., Strong, W. B., Douglas, P. S., Clark, L. T., ... Epstein, A. E. (1996). Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening of Competitive Athletes: A Statement for Health Professionals from the Sudden Death Committee (Clinical Cardiology) and Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee (Cardiovascular Disease in the Young), American Heart Association. Circulation, 94, 850-856. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.4.850Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation. (2012 ). Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) website. (2012). ’Connor, D. P., & Knoblauch, M. A. (2010). Electrocardiogram Testing During Athletic Preparticipation Physical Examinations. Journal of Athletic Training, 45 (3), 265-272.O’Connor, F. G., Kugler, J. P., & Oriscello, R. G. (1998). Sudden Death in Young Athletes: Screening for the Needle in a Haystack. Retrieved from , C. (2009). AHA: ECG Cost-Effective for Screening Student Athletes. Retrieved from , T. D., Eisenberg, M. S., & Sinibaldi, G. (2004, October). Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Resuscitation, 63(1), 17-24.Shuler, P. A. (2000, October). Evaluating Student Services Provided by School-Based Health Centers: Applying the Shuler Nurse Practitioner Practice Model. Journal of School Health, 70, 348-352. Retrieved from , K. (2010, February ). Athletes at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death. The Journal of School Nursing, 26(1), 18-25. doi: 10.1177/1059840509353323Wong, B. (2011). College athletes’ risk of sudden cardiac death found higher by UW study. Retrieved from 1The 12-Element AHA Recommendations for Preparticipation Cardiovascular Screening of Competitive AthletesPersonal HistoryFamily HistoryPhysical ExaminationExertional chest pain/discomfortPremature death (sudden and unexpected, or otherwise) before age 50 years due to heart disease, in 1 relativeHeart murmurUnexplained syncope/near-syncopeDisability from heart disease in a close relative <50 years of ageFemoral pulses to exclude aortic coarctation. Excessive exertional and unexplained dyspnea(shortness of breath)/fatigue, associated with exerciseSpecific knowledge of certain cardiac conditions in family members*Physical stigmata of Marfan syndrome Prior recognition of a heart murmurBrachial artery blood pressure (sitting position, preferably in both arms)Elevated systemic blood pressureNote: In addition the HCMA suggests that children and young adults who have been adopted or are in any way unsure about their family history be viewed as potentially at risk and follow up with a comprehensive cardiac evaluation.*Hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, long-QT syndrome or other ion channelopathies, Marfan syndrome, or clinically important arrhythmias. At the discretion of the examiner, a positive response or finding in any 1 or more of the 12 items may be judged sufficient to trigger a referral for cardiovascular evaluation.**Cardiovascular screening should include ECG, echocardiogram, possible stress test, possible cardiac MRI and follow up plan as needed. In the opinion of the HCMA, these tests should be conducted by a cardiac professional, not a general practitioner or pediatrician (HCMA, 2009). Figure 1Figure 1. Causes of sudden cardiac death in young competitive athletes (median age 17), based on systematic tracking of 158 athletes in the United States, primarily from 1985 to 1995. Ao indicates aorta; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; AS, aortic stenosis; C-M, cardiomyopathy; ARVD, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia; MVP, mitral valve prolapse; CAD, coronary artery disease; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ↑, increased. Adapted from Maron et al with permission of the American Medical Association.Appendix AAppendix BAppendix CThe American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) PPEAppendix D12 Lead ECG Placement Part I Lead ECG Placement Part II E Appendix FWashburn UniversityDepartment of Kinesiology Adult 12 LEAD ECG COMPETENCY CHECKLIST NAME_______________________________ DATE____________________Competent Performance(Verbalization or Return Demonstration)Adult 12-Lead EKG PerformanceYes (V/D)NoValidatorCommentsCheck cable & lead wire for disconnected wires.Position patient and identify limb sites.Prepare skin for electrode placement to assure adequate tracing as needed:Cleanse with soap & water, and/orAbrade skin using washcloth or 4x4, and/orApply skin prep, and/orTrim hair with clippers (no razor)Apply electrodes to patient securely in appropriate position; fasten lead wires per 12-Lead ECG Procedure.Leave limb electrodes in place.Place V leads per Right-Sided ECG Procedure:V1 - 4th Intercostal Space (ICS), right sternal borderV2 - 4th ICS, left sternal borderV4 - 5th ICS left midclavicular lineV3 - Equidistance between V2R and V4RV5 - horizontal level of V4R at the left anterior axillary lineV6 - horizontal level of V4R at the left midaxillary lineTurn on ECG machineDemographic data should be entered at the top of the ECG.Last NameFirst NameGenderDate of birth AgeCheck for accuracyAssess tracing quality by reviewing ECG monitor and printed ECG. Perform the following steps for troubleshooting:Check for negative deflection in lead 1 which would indicate right and left arm lead reversal.Review ECG for missing lead(s).Acquire (print)ECG image Rev 12/12Signature of ValidatorInitialsAppendix G ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download