Brown University



ARCH 2740 Social Life in Ancient Egypt

Professor Laurel Bestock

Wednesdays 3-5:20pm

Rhode Island Hall 008

The Egyptians had a complex ideology pertaining to the self, perceiving themselves as multi-faceted individuals whose embodiment transcended death. They were concerned with questions which have returned in later European philosophy - questions about being and non-being, about the meaning of death, the constitution of the body, about the nature of the cosmos and humanity, and about the basis of human society. Studying such ideas and their relavence both to individuals and to broader groups within society requires a careful examination of often difficult and fragmentary evidence.

This course will draw upon theoretical developments in anthropology and sociology that seek to explore fluid hierarchies of difference - age, sex, class, ethnicity - providing an opportunity to link theory and data in an innovative manner. Taking the lifecycle as its structure, the course covers Egyptian life from conception to death and burial, drawing a range of data sources such as material culture, iconography, textual data and human remains. Through an examination of both theory and diverse sets of data we will attempt to shed light on the complexity of identity in the ancient Egyptian past.

There are three critical goals for the participants in this class. The first is to critically approach the very notion of categorization with regards to identity in the past. The second is to address the means of bridging theory and data, which is often an extremely difficult part of producing convincing scholarship. Finally the course will serve as preparation for students who will be writing dissertations in any subfield of archaeology or Egyptology. Student presentations will be structured as though they were trying to propose a dissertation from the week’s topic. We will constantly frame our approachin discussion in terms of asking good questions and developing methodologies and data sets that are appropriate to those questions. The research paper will be structured like a dissertation prospectus; it is less important that conclusions be final than that an appropriate approach to the topic be clarified.

Assessment:

1. Presentations (30%)

2. Participation in discussions (20%)

3. Response papers (15%)

4. Research paper to be handed in at the end of the term on a topic agreed to after consultation with the professor (35%).]

Presentations:

Every student will give two presentations during the course of the semester. These will be case studies related to the weekly topics and will rely upon both archaeological reports and secondary interpretations; they should have solid theses and utilize archaeological material to back them up. Presentations will be 20-30 minutes each. All presentation topics must be cleared with the professor two weeks in advance in a discussion with me during office hours; presentations will begin the third week of class.

Research Paper:

One of the in-class presentations (your choice of which) will be the basis for a more in-depth 15 page research paper due on December 1st. I am sorry for the early deadline, but as I go into the field immediately after classes end there is no way I can give you more time and get my grades in. I have no internet in Uronarti.

Weekly Response Papers:

Each student will write a response paper each week that draws together themes from the readings, highlighting critical questions for discussion. Response papers are due posted to the wiki 24 hours before class each week, starting in week 2. While we will all do all the assigned readings each week, each student will be primarily responsible for one article or section of a book. You will focus on that piece in your own response paper (though tying its ideas to the other readings) and will be responsible for generating questions about that publication for discussion. One way to consider tackling your assigned piece is to reverse-engineer the document on the elements of a good research project. Try to figure out what the quesiton was the author was asking, what the methodology, the evidence, the answer. Do you think the question was good? Why or why not? Are the methodology and evidence well chosen for the question? Are the conclusions convincing? How could one move forward on the same topic?

All of the readings listed here are preliminary. They focus more on the data than the theory. We will collectively decide which of these things we want to read and what additionally we want to add. Students are required to do some exploration for additional reading: I expect every student to come to class each week with at least one additional source that they have scouted out as a potentially relevant and interesting reading for the following week. The last 20 minutes or so of each class will be spent determining together the readings for the next week, the themes we most want to cover, and who will concentrate on what for their response papers. Please come to class with your laptops or tablets so that you can do internet searches while we are together. If you do not have such a device, one can be checked out of either the Institute or the Egyptology Department.

We’ll also choose what types of evidence we want to focus on and then build a more detailed bibliography together. So, for instance, Ann Roth’s “Little women: gender and hierarchic proportion in Old Kingdom mastaba chapels” isn’t on the reading list. But it might be if we decide that we want to use art as one of our main sources either for gender or inequality.

Texts:

Diaz-Andreu, M. et al. 2005. The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion.

Kemp, B. J. 2006. Ancient Egypt: Anatomy of a Civilization, second edition.

Meskell, L. M. 1999. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class etc. in Ancient Egypt.

Janssen. J. and R. M. Janssen. 1990. Growing up in Ancient Egypt.

Janssen, R. and J. J. Janssen. 1996. Getting Old in Ancient Egypt.

(these are available in one volume now)

Shafer, B. (ed) 1991. Religion in Ancient Egypt

Hornung, E. 1982. Conceptions of God in Ancient Egypt: The One and the Many

Robins, G. 1993. Women in Ancient Egypt

Manniche, L. 1987. Sexual Life in Ancient Egypt.

Insoll, T. (ed) 2007. The Archaeology of Identities: a reader

Gedge, P. 1977. Child of the Morning

Additional readings as determined together.

Schedule:

|Sept. 4: What is identity? How do we categorize people? |

|Discuss course format |

| |

|Sept. 11: Categorization and Identity in the Ancient World |

|Emberling, G. “Ethnicity in complex societies: archaeological perspectives” in Journal of Archaeological Research 1997. |

|Introduction from Diaz-Andreu, et al. Archaeology of Identity |

|Wendrich, “Identity and Personhood”, Egyptian Archaeology, Wiley-Blackwell |

|Insoll, T. (ed) The Archaeology of Identities first three chapters |

|(not assigned, but worth taking a look at for some interesting ideas about the relationship between individual |

|cognition/agency and social groups: Douglas, M. How Institutions Think) |

|no response paper this week, but come to class prepared to discuss our identities again as well as the readings |

| |

|Sept. 18. Existence and Individuals in Egyptian Society |

|Meskell, L. M. 2000: “Cycles of life: narrative homology and archaeological realities.” World Archaeology: Lifecycles |

|31(3): 423 - 441. |

|Hornung, E. (1982). Conceptions of God in Ancient Egypt: The One and the Many. Cornell, Ithaca. 170-185 |

|Baines, J. (1991). “Society, Morality and Religious Practice”, B. Shafer, Religion in Ancient Egypt. Cornell, Ithaca: |

|123-200. |

|Kemp, B. J. 2006. Ancient Egypt: Anatomy of a Civilization, Routledge, London and New York. Ch. 1 and 3. |

|The Eloquent Peasant |

|The Satire of the Trades |

|Book of the Dead: Negative Confession |

| |

|PRESENTATIONS: |

|Jen Thum |

|Emily Booker |

|  |

|Sept. 25 Conception and Birth |

|Janssen. J. and R. M. Janssen. 1990: Growing up in Ancient Egypt. London, Rubicon Press. |

|Ch. 1-3 |

|Roth, A. M. (2000). Father earth, mother sky: ancient Egyptian beliefs about conception and fertility. Reading the Body: |

|Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record. A. Rautman. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press: 187 |

|– 201. |

|Meskell, L. M. 1994: Dying Young: the experience of death at Deir el Medina, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 13(2): |

|35-45. |

|Robins, G. 1994-5: Women and children in peril: pregnancy, birth and infant mortality in ancient Egypt, KMT 5(4): 24-35. |

|Roth, A. M. (1993). “Fingers, stars, and the 'Opening of the Mouth': the nature and function of the ntrwj-blades.” Journal|

|of Egyptian Archaeology 79: 57-79.  |

|Pinch, G. 1994: Magic in Ancient Egypt. London, British Museum Press, esp. Ch. 9.  |

| |

|PRESENTATIONS: |

|Jess Tomkins |

|Catie Steidl |

|  |

|Oct. 2 Childhood and Adolescence |

|Feucht, E. 1995: Das Kind im alten Ägypten. Frankfurt/New York, Campus Verlag. |

|Janssen, J. J. and R. M. Janssen. 1990: Growing up in Ancient Egypt. London, Rubicon Press. Ch. 4-6, 8-11. |

|Meskell, L. M. 1999: Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class etc. in Ancient Egypt. Oxford, Blackwell. |

|Wilfong, T. 1999: Menstrual synchrony and the "Place of Women" in ancient Egypt. (Oriental Institute Museum Hieratic |

|Ostracon 13512). In God of Praise: Studies in Honour of Professor Edward F. Wente, E. Teeter and J. A. Larson (Ed.). |

|Chicago, University of Chicago Press.   |

|Lucy, S. “The archaeology of age” in The Archaeology of Identity |

|Joyce, R. “Girling the girl and boying the boy: the production of adulthood in ancient Mesoamerica” in The Archaeology of |

|Identities |

| |

|PRESENTATION: |

|Simon Hochberg |

| |

|Oct. 9 AND 16: Ethnicity |

|Return to Emberling article |

|Lucy, S. “Ethnic and cultural identities” in The Archaeology of Identity |

|Booth, C. 2005. The role of foreigners in ancient Egypt: a study of non-stereotypical artistic representations |

|Smith, S. T. 2003. Wretched Kush: ethnic identities and boundaries in Egypt’s Nubian empire |

|Kansa, E. and Levy, T. 2002. “Ceramics, Identity, and the Role of the State: the view from Nahal Tillah” Egypt and the |

|Levant: interrelations from the 4th through the early 3rd millennium BCE. 190-212. |

|Stevenson, A. 2008. “Ethnicity and Migration? The Cemetery of el-Gerzeh” in Egypt at its Origins 2. |

| |

|PRESENTATIONS: |

|Oct. 9: |

|Emily Drennan |

|Maggie Geoga |

|Oct. 15: |

|Kathryn McBride |

|  |

|Oct. 23 Sex and Gender |

|Wylie, A. “The constitution of archaeological evidence: gender politics and science” in Archaeology of Identities. |

|Graves-Brown, C. (ed) 2008. Sex and Gender in Ancient Egypt: don your wig for a joyful hour. |

|Sweeney, D. 2011. “Sex and Gender” in the UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology |

|Riggs, C. 2010. “The Body” in the UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology |

|Bryan, B. M. 1996: In woman good and bad fortune are on earth: status and roles of women in Egyptian culture. In Mistress |

|of the House, Mistress of Heaven: Women in Ancient Egypt, A. K. Capel and G. E. Markoe (Ed.). New York, Hudson Hills |

|Press, pp. 25-46. |

|Roehrig, C. 1996: Women’s work: Some ocupations of nonroyal women as depicted in ancient Egyptian art. In Mistress of the |

|House. |

|Lesko, B. S. 1994-5: Researching the role of women in ancient Egypt, KMT 5(4): 14-23. |

|Robins, G. 1993: Women in Ancient Egypt. London, British Museum. |

|Diaz-Andreu, M. “Gender Identity” in The Archaeology of Identity |

|Swart, L. 2008. “Observations on the Status of Women in the 21st and 22nd Dynasty, Thebes, Egypt” JSSEA 35, 207-16. |

|Depauw, M. 2003. “Notes on Transgressing Gender Boundaries in Ancient Egypt”, ZÄS 130, 49-59. |

| |

|PRESENTATION: |

|Catie Steidl |

|  |

|Oct. 30 Inequalities |

|Cruz-Uribe, E. 1982. “Slavery in Egypt during the Saite and Persian Periods” in Revue Internationale des Droits de |

|l’Antiquité, Brussels. |

|Bakir, A. el-M. 1952. Slavery in Pharaonic Egypt. Cairo. |

|Loprieno, A. 2012. “Slavery and Servitude” in the UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. |

|Lorton, D. 1977. “Treatment of Criminals in Ancient Egypt through the New Kingdom” Journal of the Economic and Social |

|History of the Orient XX.1. |

|O’Connor, D and D. Silverman. 1995: Ancient Egyptian Kingship. Leiden, New York and Cologne, E. J. Brill. – don’t read |

|this all, but be aware of it. |

|Brumfiel, E. M. 1992: “Distinguished Week in archaeology: breaking and entering the ecosystem — gender, class, and faction|

|steal the show”, American Anthropologist 94: 551 - 567. |

|Meskell, L. M. 1999: Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class etc. in Ancient Egypt. Oxford, Blackwell. |

|Wilfong, T. G., Ed. 1997: Women and Gender in Ancient Egypt: From Prehistory to Late Antiquity, Ann Arbor, MI, Kelsey |

|Museum of Archaeology.  |

| |

|PRESENTATIONS: |

|Jess Tomkins |

|Emily Booker |

|  |

|Nov. 6 Partnership |

|Janssen, J. J. 1988: Marriage problems and public reactions (P. BM 10416). In Pyramid Studies and Other Essays Presented |

|to I. E. S. Edwards, J. Baines, T. G. H. James, A. Leahy and A. F. Shore (Ed.). London, Egypt Exploration Society, pp. |

|134-137. |

|Johnson, J. “Sex and Marriage in Ancient Egypt” in Hommages a Fayza Haikal, Grimal, N. (ed). 149-59. |

|Robins, G. 1993: Women in Ancient Egypt. London, British Museum. |

|Toivari, J. 1997: Man versus woman: interpersonal disputes in the workmen's community of Deir el Medina, Journal of the |

|Economic and Social History of the Orient 39(4): 1 - 21. |

|Toivari, J. 1998: Marriage at Deir el Medina. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Egyptologists, C. J.|

|Eyre (Ed.). Leuven, Uitgeverij Peeters, pp. 1157 - 1163.   |

|Campagno, M. 2009 “Kinship and Family Relations” in the UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology |

|Allen, J. The Heqanakht Papyri |

| |

|PRESENTATIONS: |

|Kathryn McBride |

|Maggie Geoga  |

| |

|Nov. 13 Organizing principles: Religion and Law in Society |

|Edwards, D. “The Archaeology of Religion” in The Archaeology of Identity |

|Baines, J. 1991: Society, morality, and religious practice. In Religion in Ancient Egypt, B. E. Shafer (Ed.). London, |

|Routledge, pp. 123 - 200. |

|Eloquent Peasant |

|Johnson, J. 1996: The legal status of women in Ancient Egypt. In Mistress of the House. |

|Lorton, D. Legal and Social Institutions of Pharaonic Egypt, in Sasson (ed.) Civilizations of the Ancient Near East vol. |

|1. |

|Jasnow, R. 2003. several chapters from Westbrook, R. (ed). A History of Ancient Near Eastern Law |

|Sadek: Popular Religion in Egypt during the New Kingdom |

|Schaefer: Temples Priests and Rituals in Temples of Ancient Egypt |

|Sweeney, D. 2008 “Gender and Oracular Practice in Deir el-Medina”, ZÄS 135, 154-164 |

| |

|PRESENTATION: |

|Emily Drennan |

|  |

|Nov. 20 Attitudes to Death and Facing the Afterworld |

|Cerny, J. 1945: The will of Naunakhte and related documents, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 31: 29-53. |

|D'Auria, S., P. Lacovara and C. H. Roehrig, Eds. 1988: Mummies and Magic: The Funerary Arts of Ancient Egypt, Boston and |

|Dallas, Boston Museum of Fine Arts and Dallas Museum of Art. |

|Janssen, R. and J. J. Janssen. 1996: Getting Old in Ancient Egypt. London, Rubicon Press. |

|Lloyd, A. B. 1989: Psychology and society in the ancient Egyptian cult of the dead. In Religion and Philosophy in Ancient |

|Egypt, W. K. Simpson (Ed.). New Haven, Yale Egyptological Studies, pp. 117 – 133.  |

|Hussein, M. 2001. “Anatomy of the Egyptian Tomb: the Egyptian tomb as a womb”, Discussions in Egyptology 49, 25-33. |

| |

|Assmann, J. 1989b: Death and initiation in the funerary religion of ancient Egypt. In Religion and Philosophy in Ancient |

|Egypt, W. K. Simpson (Ed.). New Haven, Yale Egyptology Series 3, pp. 135 - 159. |

|Hornung, E. 1982. Conceptions of God in Ancient Egypt: The One and the Many. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. |

|Hornung, E. 1989. Idea Into Image:  Essays on Ancient Egypt. New York, Timken Publishers, Inc. |

|Hornung, E. 1999. The Ancient Egyptian Books of the Afterlife. Ithaca, Cornell University Press. |

|PRESENTATIONS: |

|Simon Hochberg |

|Jen Thum |

|  |

|December 4: wrapup |

|Gedge, P. Child of the Morning |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download

To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.

It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.

Literature Lottery

Related searches